Print the value of index0
  • Report:  #1134153

Complaint Review: (((NAME(S) REDACTED DUE TO PERCEIVED HARASSMENT / CYBERSTALKING / CYBERBULLYING / REVENGE POST)))

(((NAME(S) REDACTED DUE TO PERCEIVED HARASSMENT / CYBERSTALKING / CYBERBULLYING / REVENGE POST))) | RIPOFF REPORT POST-PUBLICATION CONTENT REVIEW: EDITORIAL REDACTIONS | Bad attorney. Over charges. Ambulance chaser henderson Nevada

  • Reported By:
    JK — henderson Nevada
  • Submitted:
    Thu, March 27, 2014
  • Updated:
    Mon, November 09, 2015
  • (((NAME(S) REDACTED DUE TO PERCEIVED HARASSMENT / CYBERSTALKING / CYBERBULLYING / REVENGE POST)))
    Nevada
    USA
  • Phone:
  • Category:

EDITOR’S COMMENT:  Ripoff Report strongly believes in the First Amendment, especially when consumers are truthfully warning other consumers about potential frauds, scams, rip-offs or the like by shady individuals or businesses.  Ripoff Report is by consumers, for consumers…and we want to keep it that way!  Unfortunately this Report was posted and, upon additional information, appears to have been primarily for the purpose of bullying or harassment.  In many instances Ripoff Report will reach out to the author of the Report to obtain further information.  In other instances, enough information is provided to Ripoff Report to warrant redactions without reaching out to the author.  Ripoff Report is working to combat tactics that are perceived to be cyberharassment, cyberstalking, cyberbullying and/or what is generally considered a “revenge post” as we do not condone such behavior. 

The Report was brought to our attention and, upon review of compiled information (which will be done on a case by case basis without any obligation as resources allow), and at Ripoff Report’s sole discretion, information that did not conform to current policies and/or the identifying information relating to the individual(s) and/or business(es) named in this “Report” and any subsequent comments thereto have been editorially redacted as indicated by the following “(((REDACTED)))” or (((REDACTED DUE TO PERCEIVED HARASSMENT / REVENGE POST)))”.

CONSUMERS:  Be kind.  Keep it honest.  Keep it fair.  Stick to the facts.  Do your research.  Keep the dirty laundry in the laundry hamper…not on Ripoff Report.

PLEASED TO SEE SUCH EFFORTS?  YOU CAN HELP RIPOFF REPORT COMBAT THOSE WHO ABUSE THE SYSTEM:  Ripoff Report, as resources allow, is working towards combatting Cyberharassment, Cyberstalking, Cyberbullying and/or other problems such as what is generically called “revenge posts” that can be riddled with nasty personal allegations that can be serious.   Ripoff Report would love to be able to timely address each and every review request we receive, however, this takes resources.  If you think this is a worth-while endeavor, we encourage you to make a donation so that we can expand the resources that we can devote to this project.  You can make a non-tax deductible donation by clicking on the PayPal icon at the bottom of the page located at the following URL:  http://www.ripoffreport.com/ConsumersSayThankYou/Donate.aspxThe more resources we have, the more resources we can devote to this project and other forward thinking and positive initiatives like it.

Thank you!

~ Ripoff Report Staff

NOW TO THE EDITORIALLY REDACTED REPORT:

 Like the others on this site-(((REDACTED))) IS a terrible attorney.

He over charges for the caliber he is.

I wont say my name here because after I fired this liar he threatened to "undo me by exposing all my secrets"

He said he would leak them out-and no one would know where the information came from-so much for Attorney-Client privelage.

He is untrust worthy, and not a good attorney - doesn't do his homework-is unprepared for court.

Trust me get another attorney.

1 Updates & Rebuttals


Rose Law Group

Phoenix,
Arizona,

NOTICE OF LEGAL ACTION

#2General Comment

Thu, July 10, 2014

To “JK”:

 

On or around March 27, 2014, you, an anonymous person, authored and caused to be posted on www.ripoffreport.com Report: #1134153 titled “(((REDACTED))) Attorney (((REDACTED)))and (((REDACTED))) Bad attorney. Over charges. Ambulance chaser henderson Nevada”  Your report is viewable at the url http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/(((REDACTED)))/henderson-Nevada/(((REDACTED)))-Attorney-(((REDACTED)))-and-(((REDACTED)))-Bad-attorney-Over-charges-Ambulance-chase-1134153.

 A lawsuit is pending against you in Maricopa County Superior Court.  The case was assigned Case No. CV2014-052155.  (((REDACTED))) is the plaintiff.  The defendant is John Doe.  You are John Doe.

Maricopa County Superior Court is located at 201 West Jefferson Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2243.  You may obtain a copy of the complaint from the Maricopa County Superior Court.  You may obtain a copy of the complaint by request, in writing, made to the law firm Rose Law Group, P.C., at 7144 East Stetson Drive, Suite 300, Scottsdale, Arizona 85251.  Your request should be specific and reference the case caption and case number above.    

On July 10, 2014, a subpoena was issued to XCentric Ventures LLC, an Arizona Limited Liability Company.  XCentric Ventures, LLC manages the website located atwww.ripoffreport.com.  The purpose of the subpoena is to discover your true identity.  You may obtain a copy of the subpoena by request, in writing, made to the law firm Rose Law Group, P.C., at 7144 East Stetson Drive, Suite 300, Scottsdale, Arizona 85251.  Your request should be specific and reference the case caption and case number above.     

 You have certain legal rights, including a right to timely and anonymously file and serve a response to the subpoena.  Any response to the subpoena should be filed with the Maricopa County Superior Court at the address above and copies should be mailed to (1) Rose Law Group, P.C., at 7144 East Stetson Drive, Suite 300, Scottsdale, Arizona 85251 and (2) XCentric Ventures, LLC C/O Maria Speth, Jaburg & Wilk, P.C., 3200 North Central Avenue, Suite 2000, Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2440.

 This notification is made in accordance with the requirements of Mobilisa, Inc. v. John Doe 1 et al., 217 Ariz. 103, 170 P.3d 712 (App. 2007). 

Respond to this Report!