Print the value of index0
Barrister Global Services Verbally and mentally demeaning company to work for in Hammond Louisiana
I am one of the few employees that made it around year working in there office, these people are the most difficult I have worked for.
A typical day at this office if to recieve demeaning, threatning and very unprofesional emails from the obviously very uneducated "owner" John Bowers.
Though this did not happen to me, Mr. Bowers gave one of his Employee's an ultamatium to choose between his job and his family. This employee made the obvious decision to choose his family, this is just one the of very many things this company will try to pull.
I dealt with many techs on a daily basis, and the reports they are putting out here are very true! This company will find any reason to no pay there techs, even those that go above and beyond for this company.
Though they continue to say they have been in business for 35-40 years depening on which blog you find them on , these are not the same owners. They have an outrageous turn over rate, which i have been told "is to recieve govnerment grants" and "the business was sold to his mother so they could get the goverment grant for handicap business owners."
Avoid this company at all cost, they are nothing more than ruthless, money hungry con artist that will not stop until they are shut down!
Being they are always recruiting Barrister employees to help at his other business's which include, a Cigar shop and Hair salon amongst others, i can only assume he cannot keep employees at these locations eihter.
10 Updates & Rebuttals
Debra D. Bowers
Louisiana,Procedure
#11REBUTTAL Owner of company
Wed, November 27, 2013
When Barrister offers an assignment to a subcontractor all terms and conditions are sent to him/her in an email with the assignment. It is made very clear in the documents that failure to return parts will result in the technician being charged. Barrister faces charges for non-returned parts and we count on our contracted techs to fulfill the job assignments and return the good unused or used parts using labels sent from the vendor who provides the parts. When the tech fails to do so, he/she is charged back for the cost of the part. The technician filing this complaint says that "everything was fine for a while"....but, suddenly Barrister has failed to pay him because he did not return a part. Everything was fine and payments were made promptly because the technician completed the assignments and returned the parts. He knew and understood what needed to be done and when he did it there were no payment issues. A failure by the tech to comply with requirements he clearly understood, as he had done work and been paid promptly and correctly, does not constitute a "rip off" by Barrister. What this post tells us is that this individual likely did not return the parts correctly causing him to be charged for the part not returned. The tech should submit all supporting documentation he claims to have to show he returned everything on time and correctly to payissues@barrister.com, fully explain the issue and his desired result, and allow us the opportunity to assist him. It sounds from his post as if several people at Barrister did try to assist him and he just did not have the proper information to support the part was returned causing Barrister to pay for a part and Barrister to pass along that cost to him, as it clearly states will be done in each and every dispatch emailed to a tech upon accepting assignment. Barrister has not "ripped off" this tech or any tech. In the few instances where a tech is not paid or, as in this case, charged back for non-return of a part, it is done after making numerous efforts to remind the tech to return the part or provide what is needed to facilitate payment. Barrister paid over 3,000 technicians last year. Compared to the very few who have posted negatively, it becomes apparent that Barrister is not mistreating or unfairly penalizing anyone. We value and appreciate our techs and we make every effort to make sure they are paid promptly and correctly. We work with the finest independent contractor technicians in North America and we are proud of our long history of fair and ethical payment practices. We urge this technician to submit all of his documentation as described above and we will certainly take a look to see if there is an error on Barrister's part and if so, it will be promptly corrected.
Debra D. Bowers
Hammond,Louisiana,
Stop this prank
#11REBUTTAL Owner of company
Thu, October 24, 2013
See previous responses. Please stop hiding behind anonymity and contact me directly to address
Barrister survivor
Covington,Louisiana,
Sorry for their ignorance
#11Author of original report
Thu, October 24, 2013
I posted this to warn ALL who plan on working here, I apologize for the ignorance of this company and owner for hijacking my warnings to try and make themselves look better though it helped to show how this company and it's owner's operate.
This is will be my last post, if you do not believe me please just google this companies name and you will see I am not the only person that has had issues.
RUN RUN RUN!
Barrister survivor
Covington ,Louisiana,
This is no game!
#11Author of original report
Wed, October 23, 2013
This is no game, this is peoples lives that y'all are ruining and making more difficult! I cannot wait for you and your family to fail, you are good at driving your business in the ground, so probably won't be long.
Debra D. Bowers
Hammond,Louisiana,
Posting anonymously is non productive.
#11REBUTTAL Owner of company
Wed, October 23, 2013
Posting anonymously to a site like this is non productive and allows you to make foolish unsubstantiated statements that lead nowhere. I am signing my posts because I am addressing your lies. If you have an issue or concern please contact me. I know that you know how to do so as this has become a game of sorts to you. I will not continue to reply to your anonymous posts. You are wasting your time, my time and the time of anyone reading this pure garbage. Please contact me and I will address any issue you'd care to discuss.
Barrister survivor
Covington,Louisiana,
And they strike again!
#11Author of original report
Tue, October 22, 2013
I have never in my life seen a company that will fight and argue over supposed "lies" that are being put out about them, in their rebuttal they talk crap about the employee I mentioned in my origianl post that they made choose between work and his family, which goes to show just how this company treats it's employees.
Like I said they strike again, they told the entire dispatch department in Hammond they have 2 weeks before they will be let go if they do not improve their numbers. This right now is not possible due to the amount of people in the department (it is the time of year that a ton of people will be hired and fired) and they know this.
LIKE I SAID BEFORE, RUN!!
Debra D. Bowers
Hammond,Louisiana,
Sticking to that script!
#11REBUTTAL Owner of company
Thu, October 17, 2013
The truth is the truth.
Debra D. Bowers
Hammond,Louisiana,
Technicians are paid promptly and correctly by Barrister
#11REBUTTAL Owner of company
Thu, October 17, 2013
Thousands of technicians are paid promptly and correctly by Barrister. If there is an error or a delay, Barrister promptly resolves the matter with the technician. Posting misinformation about our company is a way for some of the techs to try to steer others away from accepting work from Barrister. It is a shameful practice. We urge everyone who reads this kind of willful misrepresentation to disregard it as the fallacy it is.
Barrister survivor
Covington ,Louisiana,
Sticking to that script!
#11Author of original report
Wed, October 16, 2013
You guys are great at keeping with those scripts, amazing how all rebuttals just seem to say the same things over and over, like I stated previously I was not the employee who was made to make this decision. However, that was a perfect display of the negativity and abuse this company will put you through and just proved they still talk bad abot their employees after the leave.
Debra D. Bowers
Hammond,Louisiana,
There are so many fallacies and misinformation in the “report” filed, that it is apparent to me that this individual is simply lying.
#11REBUTTAL Owner of company
Wed, October 16, 2013