Complaint Review: BRAKE MASTERS

SHALOM LAYTIN, ERIC LAYTIN, MATAN SIMCHA OZER LAYTIN, MATAN LAYTIN,

Warning, Run Away from these persons,

Please be aware and please stay away,

Read carefully the multiple case for fraud,

Case No. 77/16-22 / OAHNo.2016030421

https://www.bar.ca.gov/pdf/accusations/ard274417_2015_11_09_acc.pdf

https://www.bar.ca.gov/pdf/accusations/ard233690_2017_06_08_dec.pdf

https://www.plainsite.org/dockets/2rkdy634g/superior-court-of-california-county-of-los-angeles/sanda-nevada-llc-v-shalom-laytin/

PLEASE READ:

On or about March 5,2014, an undercover operator with the Bureau ("operator") took
the Bureau's 2000 Chevrolet to Brake Masters #135. The front brake pads on the Bureau-
documented vehicle were in need of replacement. The operator told a male employee that she
wanted the oil and filter changed and a squeaking noise inspected. The operator signed and
received a copy of a written estimate in the amount of $27.95 and left the facility.
At approximately 1034 hours that same day, the operator received a call from
Respondent's employee, "Tim". Tim told the operator that the front brakes were worn, and
recommended replacing the front brake pads and resurfacing the front rotors. Tim claimed that
the master cylinJ·c, was leaking, that it waS dangerous to drive the v,:,icle as "the brake
hydraulics could fail at any minute", and that the master cylinder needed replacement. Tim also
claimed that the brake fluid needed to be !lushed. Tim told the operator that it would cost a total
of$597 for the repairs. The operator told Tim she would call him back. At approximately 1044
hours, the operator called the facility and authorized the repairs.
At approximately 1200 hours, the operator received another call from Tim. Tim
claimed that the left caliper piston "would not go back in" because it was damaged from
overheating and that the left front brake caliper needed replacement at a total cost of $129.15.
The operator told Tim she would call him back. At approximately 1209 hours, the operator called
the facility and authorized the additional work.

(BRAKE MASTERS OF SACRAMENTO, INC.) ACCUSATION27. On or about March 6, 2014, the operator returned to the facility to retrieve the
vehicle, paid $760.30 for the repairs, and received a copy of an invoice.
28. On or about March 11,2014, the Bureau inspected the vducle and found that the
facility had performed approximately $540.80 in unnecessary repairs