Print the value of index0
Cohen & Slamowitz metro portfolios inc. SCAM...FRAUD...ROBBERY...THIEVES...LIARS woodbury, New York
I have never even heard of these guys until today when i found out they sued me for 1909.00....i am outraged at the fact that a court came to a judgement in this fake companys favor and i have never dealt with them in any way nor was i in court to defend myself...how do things like this happen? I believe they are garnishing my wages ,how much i am unsure of but i cannot afford for anyone to take my money..if i truly owed it then i would be more then willing to do my part but i dont, i am a single mother of two boys times are tough and i am just in complete disbelief ..please Help!!
1 Updates & Rebuttals
Tsancho
Dallas,Texas,
USA
This may help
#2Consumer Comment
Fri, January 06, 2012
Cohen & Slamowitz, LLP is a high volume debt collection law firm with its main office located at 199 Crossways Park Dr., Woodbury, NY 11797-02016.Cohen & Slamowitz has been sued repeatedly by New York consumers for its unfair and deceptive debt collection practices. For example:Earlier this year, Schlanger & Schlanger LLP along with co-counsel Roddy, Klein & Ryan brought t a class action lawsuit against Cohen & Slamowitz and several of its attorneys for violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). The case relates to collection actions taken on judgments obtained via fraudulent service of process of which Cohen & Slamowitz had knowledge. Specifically, in 2006 a process server who had spent years working for Midlantic Process admitted under oath that his former employer, who worked extensively for Cohen & Slamowitz, systematically filed thousands of false affidavits with New York courts. Cohen & Slamowitz was aware of Mr. Vegas affidavit, having been involved in the case in which it was filed, and did nothing about it. They neither notified the impacted consumers, nor the Courts, that the Midlantic affidavits of service were false, nor that the law firms previous sworn statements regarding the affidavits were in need of revision. To the contrary, when confronted with consumers who claimed lack of service, Cohen & Slamowitz pointed to the Midlantic affidavits as definitive proof that service had been made. The case, Coble, et al. v. Cohen & Slamowitz, LLP, et al., 11-cv-1037 (S.D.N.Y. 2011), is still pending; check in here for more updates as the case progresses.
newyorkconsumerprotection.com call the bums out, they been sued before