Diana Moralez Chris Scott Graham Dechert LLP Silicon Valley Chris Scott Graham -and whoever else covers up conduct unbecoming a corporate law firm, and the justice system Employs felon who drags the prestige of her company against me and my children victims of her brother and herself Mountain View , California
In a Santa Clara County Court Case 109CH002782 Diana Moralez Melegrito tried to have my kids and myself thrown into the street under the pretense her employer insisted that she must "as he feared for her safety" according to court documents making it all the more ridiculous because A) the house I was living in had been sold at auction B) She must not of learned her lesson while incarcerated in the Calfornia Department of Corrections state prison C) she only attempted to do so after ripping off her brother when purchasing his home when he could not get a refinance by giving herself a 145,000 in a sales addedum to the contract that she signed his name on it after he was arrested for Domestic Violence over a fight about her, calling and threatening me that morning not to be poking around in her loan documents! Too late sister! After her brother paid two different or possible three different people to do so, unsucessfully I sent all of the documents to another agency to check.
In an attempt to have her way she filed in court an affadavit stating she was the owner 4 months after the foreclosure and tried to have me thrown out by serving me a bogas process of law a UD, better yet she had her friend James Troy Wilson deliver it for her to me. Holy inappropriateness because it was a raid of his office that resulted in the loan documents coming into possecession of The Santa Clara County District Attorneys office. "Troy" a former Su Casa agent was now trying to recruit Dianas brother into giving him $5000.00 upfront in violation of the law, in order to recieve a commission for M and R Contempory Solutions, whom defrauded several home owners while doing no work. Oh course I expect for Diana to be associated with those types of people because she is a predator. If she was able to get one over on her brother so be it but on me, rethink it chick! I'm not your brother and from me you will recieve no mercy like you tried to show me and my kids, and I have none for your employer either, who gave you the tools of the trade to continue to con and hussle anyone you can. Heres the line jump back jump back you dont know me like that!
Your boss has a new "fiction" book out, and so while he might enjoy a good story I do not. Upon discovering in the papers served to me an affadavit from Diana stating the Home Protection Group in Diamond Bar CA was in November four months after foreclosure was having the trustee sale rescinded, and stamed with a notary stamp from Dechert LLP employee Patti D Selan, I wasnt too happy because the Home Protection Group Diamond Bar CA was the next "loan modication" out fit that Wilson tried to push onto Dianas brother right after they arrested M and R Contempory Solutions owners a few days before. They only wanted $3000-3500 up front in violation of the law. The paper work also stated clearly that in order for them to be able to accept a case they needed at least 10 business days before the auction date which would of been June 2009 not November 2009, nice try dummy! Wilson insisted that didnt matter and continued to try and collect money anyhow.
So I contacted Dechert LLP employee Selan to see if she notarized the document, she said 'she could neither confirm or deny" so I wrote to the Secretary of State. Seems to me if she had notarized the document she would say so, whats the big deal right she and Diana are co-workers, for that matter maybe Diana uses her stamp when ever she likes? who knows and I dont care except that Diana who had both a notary and real estate lisence before going to prison for embezzling a large amount of money and converting it to her own use while cooking the books knows that "a felon can not be a notary." Futhermore, if Selan did not notarize the document, since she the supposed IP manager should hold on to her stamp more closely. All of the above might not of been what it was however if I had also not found a Grant Deed with the notary stamp Leslie Gates on it. Gates is also a Dechert Employee. Since their are four or more Grant Deeds "interspousal" included in which Diana would pretend to be married to her brother in at least one, apparently to help her qualify for the loan she stole from, I'm asking Selan questions or who ever has answers.
Duly noted upon my discovery of "the affadavit" questioning the notarization, Diana filed a TRO against me, perhaps in part to help her brothers pending criminal case, but mostly to cover her own actions. Oh and by the way the interspousal grant deeds dont include the appropriate taxs, Diana has three counts of filing false taxs returns as well, so that came as a complete surprise right? That TRO in which she suggests her employer instucted her to get rather than name Graham and Selan in directly was in effect until court when we went to trial and her order was DENIED. She brought her full overly grown daughter to court to get on the stand and perjure herself even. Merry Christmas the jokes on me. Happy New Year its back on ya! Liar liar pants on fire, but not for your husband who you forgot to list in that TRO. Instead Diana lists her 82 year old mother two adult children and a minor. Diana took over her mothers home and had her brother build her a house behind it for herself, how did she work that out in some places its called elder abuse of the not overly educated. I dont care about that either.
When you target your actions at myself and my family I care about that, and if you use Dechert LLP as the means to do so to give yourself credibility when you have none I care about that! If you lie on me and you try to cause me grief I care about that. If you cause my kids grief you will cease and desist. I dont know what Dechert cares about either and it makes little difference to me but it might to your clients that you have someone like her in your employ. Its also of interest that since Diana has been in the employment by Dechert LLP she has gotten a total of One million and three hundred and forty eight dollars in documents loans. There could be more? That seems like a lot of money for a secretary never mind her new Black Corvette, and so on. How much do they pay secretaries these days? I dont care about that either but if you cost me money to defend myself against your bogus and malcious court processes I care.
I informed Chris Scott Graham of both Dianas fat wallet and the fact that "if she is using her work" to further her criminality that he might want to know. Perhaps all of those Intellectual Property Secrets need protection? Since I happened to notice Diana E-filing for Graham in one or more cases to the courts in Santa Clara County I was a bit concerned about how the five court cases I had been handed from Diana, her brother and the bank in three months time were going to work themselves out putting me under undue stress and nastiness for the Holidays. I attempeted on more than three times before court to Subpena Graham, Selan, and Gates for court. They would not accept service and I ran out of time before court for the TRO and that didnt occur.
I dont find anything amusing about any of this, in fact I dont think anyone else that cares about "the law", justice, the courts, respect for the courts, or their rights will either. Shame on ya-
5 Updates & Rebuttals
Marcys Rights for me
San Jose,California,
USA
Rodriguez as the victim
#6Author of original report
Mon, March 07, 2011
B.Aggravating Circumstances [for definition, see Standards for Attorney Sanctions forProfessional Misconduct, standard 1.2(b)]. Facts supporting aggravating circumstances are required.
(1) []
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Prior record of discipline [see standard 1.2(0]
[] State Bar Court case # of prior case
[] Date prior discipline effective
[] Rules of Professional Conduct/State Bar Act violations:
[] Degree of prior discipline
[] If Respondent has two or more incidents of prior discipline, use space provided below. (2) Dishonesty: Respondent’s misconduct was surrounded by or followed by bad faith, dishonesty, concealment, overreaching or other violations of the State Bar Act or Rules of Professional Conduct.Respondent did not inform his clients, the courts, or opposing counsel in any of the cases ~he was handling that he entered a rehabilitiaton facility and would be unable to handle his cases while he
was away. This omission deprived the clients of the opportunity to seek new counsel and forced the courts and opposing counsel to assume he was being non responsive.
(3) []
(4) []
Trust Violation: Trust funds or property were involved and Respondent refused or was unable to account
to the client or person who was the object of the misconduct for improper conduct toward said funds or
property.
Harm: Respondent’s misconduct harmed significantly a client, the public or the administration of justice. Reed, Nijjar, and Kaur each lost their causes of actions and each had to employ new counsel due to respondent’s misconduct. Rodriguez had a judgment entered against him because of respondent’s misconduct. Respondent’s misconduct required additional court resources to set aside the dismissal in the Reed matter, and to set aside the judgment in the Rodriguez matter.
(5) [] Indifference: Respondent demonstrated indifference toward rectification of or atonement for the
consequences of his or her misconduct. Respondent has not taken any steps to atone for his
(Stipulation form approved by SBC Executive Committee 10116/00. Revised 1211612004; 12/13/2006.)
2
Actual Suspension
(Do not write above this line.)
misconduct.
(6) Lack of Cooperation: Respondent displayed a lack of candor and cooperation to victims of his/her
misconduct or to the State Bar during disciplinary investigation or proceedings. Respondent failed to
cooperate in the Nljjar and Rodriguez matters and responded late in the Reed, Kaur, and Skiba
Rodriguez Remodeling - Benny Rodriguez487 Chinook Lane
San Jose California 95123
U.S.A.
Phone: 408-224-3345
Category: Builders & Contractors
Submitted: Monday, February 20, 2006Last posting: Monday, March 13, 2006
Share
I contracted with Benny Rodriguez, owner of Rodriguez Remodeling for a room addition and kitchen remodel. The first thing he did was to collect a 10% deposit on a $34,000 job. I later found out that the most is is allowed to collect by law is $1,000.
He started the job in July 05,it is now February 06. He has remaining work to do, and he has abandoned the project. I call him every week, and he promises to come, but never does. It has been six weeks now, and once again a no show.
I have given him the benefit of the doubt time and time again, and evertime he has abused my trust. I know that he has at least five complaints against him with the BBB. I also know that he has been sued and lost at least once. Unfortunatly, this is a habit for him.
Chuck
san jose, California
U.S.A.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 2/20/2006 3:15:28 PM and is a permanent record located here:
http://www.ripoffreport.com/builders-contractors/rodriguez-remodeling/rodriguez-remodeling-benny-r-aay4d.htm.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Rodriguez Remodeling
Benny Rodriguez Remodeling487 Chinook Lane
San Jose California 95123
U.S.A.
Phone: 408-224-3345
Category: Builders & Contractors
Submitted: Sunday, August 22, 2004Posted: Sunday, August 22, 2004
Share
Benny Rodriguez asked for more than the allowed amount of the remodeling deposit from my retired, elder, unkowningly parents. Then in one month, he asked for $32,500 of the agreed upon $38,000 contracted price of their room addition. The job was then slowed down by Benny Rodriguez because he would not show up to work. His workers would sometimes come only to leave shortly thereafter because there were no materials to work with and inspections were not passed.
Benny Rodriguez would be very hard to get a hold of and he was very disrespectful to my father. Benny Rodriguez has a foul mouth and bad attitude. He has no remorse for stealing from my parents. To date, my parents home remodeling project is a quarter done, an eyesore to the neighborhood, and a constant strain on my parents physically, emotionally, mentally and financially. Benny Rodriguez owns two homes and two brand new huge trucks, hmmm, go figure......
V
San Jose, California
U.S.A.
Case Number:
1-04-CV-024411
CaseTitle:
Quesada Vs Rodriguez
Case Category:
Fraud - Unlimited
Note: Scroll to the right if the 'Result' column is not visible.
If 'None' is displayed in the 'Result' column, you are required to appear on the specified date.
Date
Time
Dept.
Event
Result
Result Date
Thursday, April 21, 2011
10:00AM
09
CV Case Status Review
None
None
Marcys Rights for me
San Jose,California,
USA
SANTA CLARA COUNTY DA'S OFFICE DENYING VICTIMS DUE PROCESS
#6Author of original report
Thu, December 09, 2010
Marsy Nicholas, the inspiration of Marsy's Law
with her brother Henry Nicholas, who led the campaign to pass the Constitutional Amendment
http://www.marsyslawforall.org
Proposition 9 (or the Victims' Bill of Rights Act of 2008: Marsy's Law)[] is an Amendment to the California Constitution enacted by California voters through the initiative process in the November 2008 state elections. The Act protects and extends the legal rights of victims of crime and, in so doing, amends not only the Constitution of California but the Penal Code.[]
Marsy Nicholas was the sister of Henry Nicholas, the co-founder and former Co-Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Broadcom Corporation. In 1983, Marsy, then a senior at UC Santa Barbara, was stalked and brutally murdered by her ex-boyfriend. Her murderer, Kerry Conley, died in prison one year before Marsys Law passed. Henry Nicholas became the main organizer and sponsor of the campaign to pass Marsys Law. Former California Gov. Pete Wilson calls Henry Nicholas the driving force behind the law.[]
Since its passage, Marsys Law has had a major impact on the states judicial system, a critical result has been to dramatically increase the length of parole denials. Before Marsys Law, the maximum parole denial was five years for convicted murderers and two years for all other crimes. Now parole denials can be imposed for 7, 10 and even 15 years. Statistics show that last year 20% or 656 inmates received parole denials of 7 years or more. In 2009, only 3.5% received denials of two years or less.[]
Law enforcement agencies now read victims their Marsy Rights just as the accused are read their Miranda Rights. Also, attorneys now receive training on Marsys Law, with the first such session taking place in January, 2010, at the University of California, Irvine, School of Law. Judges now rely on Marsys Law in making rulings and Marsys Law recently was cited in the mistrial of an elder abuse case because the judge found the victim had been denied due process. Marsys Law also has been the basis of two major lawsuits challenging the early release of prison inmates in California.[]
Marcys Rights for me
San Jose,California,
USA
Inflated income leads to deflated egos and loan fraud- have your problem back!
#6Author of original report
Mon, November 15, 2010
Regarding CA STATE BAR INQUIRY #10-18468- Complaint Anaylist L. Lasola - I did allege that Francis Cole STATE Bar # 219081 violated my Marcys Rights, and you said that in your letter. There is no question that is what he did. The bigger problem is that he was able to talk a DDA into doing so also. Given the total evidence that not only did he break the law to do so - in his attempt to OBSTRUCT MY JUSTICE- he has convictions for crimes of moral turptitude like his client. I sent those case numbers to you also. He did try to have that expunged but it was refused by the Judge in his case in Santa Clara County. Follow this logic - I can only point you in the direction in which to look, if you dont look there is nothing I can do about it. Its not my fault he has a lisence to break the law in order to present a defense for his client. My moral duty to my fellow citizen is complete. I cant say the same for some other people.
I have the right to ask that my rights be enforced - and I did that. The fact no one has done that at the CA STATE BAR for me despite my request is a matter for you L. Lasola to discuss with whom ever it is you will. You were given more then suffient proof to find Francis guilty of gross negligence and severe mis- conduct. There now you have it in writing once again. It's entirely possible that you feel the CA Constitution has no great significance. Thats a slippery slope allowing violations of the States Constitution, could lead to a violation of The UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AS WELL. Perhaps you read the words of some Judges thru out case law regarding "SAFE HARBOR" I know I have. I would tend to agree with those, as well as the price of apathy and evil rulers. To update the information in this report in general, might as well add that the combination of those listed in Long Beach Mortgage Sham calleda a loan, hurts everyone not just me. Contempt of Court, trying to confuse the Judge it hurts everyone not just me. The cost of someone covering it up besides the people directly involved should fall on the shoulders of some one else and NOT ME. To that end what ever is necessary for that to happen and relieve me of the burden is what I will do! YA DIG? Heres the thing L. Lasola I WAS BORN IN THE USA and NOT TODAY - DONT TREAD ON ME!
Marcys Rights for me
San Jose,California,
USA
MAY THE CIRCLE BE BROKEN UP FOR THE PUBLIC SAFETY
#6Author of original report
Tue, July 27, 2010
SO BIRDS OF A FEATHER SOMETIMES FLOCK TOGETHER?
Marcys Rights for me
San Jose,California,
USA
Rule 1-300. Unauthorized Practice of Law
#6Author of original report
Fri, June 11, 2010
(A) A member shall not aid any person or entity in the unauthorized practice of law.
Rule 1-120. Assisting, Soliciting, or Inducing Violations.
A member shall not knowingly assist in, solicit, or induce any violation of these rules or the State Bar Act.
(1) "Law Firm" means:
(a) two or more lawyers whose activities constitute the practice of law, and who share its profits, expenses, and liabilities; or
(b) a law corporation which employs more than one lawyer ; or
(c) a division, department, office, or group within a business entity, which includes more than one lawyer who performs legal services for the business entity; or
(d) a publicly funded entity which employs more than one lawyer to perform legal services.