Complaint Review: edatingdoc.com aka Radio Wright

edatingdoc.com (aka Mr. Radio Wright) is a fraud and the evidence will show that he and his company has repeatedly made material misrepresentations both online and in writing.

The sole owner of edatingdoc at edatingdoc.com (who officially goes by the name of Radio Wright) claims on his site and in several videos to have been working as an engineer for "multibillion dollar" construction projects for 8 years prior to quitting his job and becoming a pick up artist. Even if he graduated at the age of 21 and started working immediately on multibillion dollar projects, that would still mean that he would be close to the age of 30 by the time he quit his engineering job and first entered the PUA world, and yet evidence recovered from Internet Archives of his website edatingdoc.com indicate that he had been in the dating business since way back in 2008, and that means we can reasonably infer that by the time of this writing (2015) his website edatingdoc would have existed already for approximately 7 years or more, making him at least 36 years old (and that is being very conservative; he is probably significantly older and likely in his early to mid 40s). If he claims to be the world’s best Pick Up Artist and goes on to brags about winning the PUA award, then why is he still single at mid-age? If he is married then why is he still in the dating business and going on 150+ dates a year with all different sorts of women? Doctor heal thyself, anyone? In comparison, after David DeAngelo of Double Your Dating got married, he quit the business and no longer gets actively involved in PUA. So why is this guy mid-aged, and still unmarried and going on 150 dates a year? Is it not self-evident that something is very wrong here with this whole thing?

The other issue is there is no one by the name of Radio Wright in the entire United States of America! He does not exists! Go ahead, go on to any site such as Intelius and do a check for yourself. A search for “Radio Wright” comes up with zero hits. There is simply no one by that name. Which begs the question, if he is using a penname, why not man up and be honest about it? For example, David DeAngelo (real name Eben Pagan) used a penname or pseudo name too, but he never lied to anyone about it! And furthermore, why intentionally go the extra step in fabricating the lies by purposefully mentioning and pointing out that he has a weird first name? How can anyone trust the edatingdoc on his so-called “Man-to-Man” guarantee when he has proven time and again that he cannot even be trusted to be honest about his age, his occupation or his name?
 
His “150 dates” a year is a scam in-and-of itself too! He has never been on 150+ dates in any one single year. Once again the evidence his proven him to be a liar and a fraud beyond any reasonable doubt, on his website he makes the misrepresentation and intentionally gives off the fraudulent misimpression of going on 150 dates in one single year. Yet Internet Archives (archive.org ) proves that he hasn’t updated his website since early 2011 (roughly four years ago!) in terms of the names and number of dates that he has been on! How can he claim to have gone on 150 dates in a year when evidence from his own website conclusively proves that he has only documented /tallied less than half of the amount of that many dates in the span of 4 years or more! As of early 2015 at last count (at the time of this writing) his website lists that he has been on a total of 74 dates out of the 150 goal. And yet these are the same dates and exact same girls and stories that he has cataloged, written, blogged, posted and bragged about since way back in 2011! Heck, that is comes down to only 18 dates a year or so. And mind you, he only ever wrote about a small tiny fraction of the total number of 74 dates that he claims to have been on, the vast majority of those dates are just numeric tallies, and he expects us to just blindly take his word for it without any evidence to substantiate his claims. Even the dates and girls and stories that he did document and wrote about are all rehashes and repeat articles that have been published on his site years and years ago! He simply recycles the stories and hopes no one notices! A reader coming across his site in 2015 would have reasonably been misled into believing that those were fresh dates that just recently happened, recent encounters, real dates, recent dating advice, recent experiences… one would have to dig deeper to reveal and uncover the truth of his criminal activities : to wit:  that the so-called edatingdoc has been making material misrepresentation and criminal fraudulent conveyance in order to scam and con unsuspecting consumers out of hundreds or thousands of dollars.

When his reputation (or actual lack thereof) is the product, and it is nothing but a pack of lies, then edatingdoc is guilty of theft by deception for all the countless men that he has conned and defrauded throughout the years.