Print the value of index0
  • Report:  #741555

Complaint Review: eLance Inc.

eLance, Inc. elance.com U.S. Workers held to more strict policy standards than Foreign Workers mountain view, California

  • Reported By:
    UndisclosedUSCo — Los Angeles California United States of America
  • Submitted:
    Thu, June 16, 2011
  • Updated:
    Thu, June 16, 2011
  • eLance, Inc.
    441 Logue Avenue, Suite 150
    mountain view, California
    United States of America
  • Phone:
    6503197500
  • Category:

eLance allows a business out of Pakistan to continue on eLance which demanded us to pay via wire, to a personal account, though took us down without warning concerning communication regarding offering our clients options concerning payment, and we're a U.S. company.

The information regarding the Pakistan firm was communicated in detail to a high level manager, who indicated it was against policy, yet clearly nothing was ever done. The business was not affected, no new profile, and no, they are not in the process of being taken down but allowed to complete projects which an eLance Support Rep indicated was "likely" the case.

eLance holds U.S. businesses unfairly to a different set of rules/policy compliance than Foreign organizations which is simply un-American & wrong.

Their actions support the current negative U.S. fiscal issues, and continued financial rape of the U.S. workforce as the financial playing field between the U.S., and any competing firm outside the US are obviously in drastic contrast. In essence, they step on the U.S. Worker twice.

I'm all for playing a competitive game, as long the umpire doesn't have 2 Sets of Rules which clearly eLance execution indicates they operate with.

Congratulations eLance!

You cost 4 U.S. Workers their Jobs & Supported the downturn in America.

Nice Job!

1 Updates & Rebuttals


UndisclosedUSCo

Los Angeles,
California,
United States of America

US Employees Affected

#2Author of original report

Thu, June 16, 2011

Revision:

"This action has cost U.S. Based Worker Jobs." 

This revision is being stated for the purpose of future proof accuracy.

Respond to this Report!