Complaint Review: Fred Campbell - USAsset Corporation

We are currently working things out so I am requesting to have this report removed.

FRED CAMPBELL (US Asset Corporation) DID NOT PERFORM PART 2! HE ONLY DID PART 1" IN AN UPDATE, DATED 27TH OF FEBRUARY 2009 I ADDED ADDITIONAL INFO REGARDING THIS TRANSACTION TO REBUTTAL FRED CAMPBELL (US Asset Corporation) CLAIMS TO TRY AND YET AGAIN MAKE HIMSELF CLEAR OF ANY WRONG DOING. I ACCIDENTALLY PUT FRED CAMPBELL DID "PART 1 & PART 2!" SO TO CORRECT THAT FACT, FRED CAMPBELL DID NOT PERFORM PART 2! AGAIN I REPEAT FRED CAMPBELL DID NOT PERFORM PART 2!
HE DID TAKE MY MONEY THOUGH! HE SEEMS TO BE GOOD AT DOING THAT!

Please be informed

Currently an FBI investigation going on,

and the Securities and Exchange Commission

Case 4:07-cv-00346 Document 1 Filed 07/18/2007
www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2007/comp20200.pdf

Our clients execute a written services agreement and escrow agreement, as did Toney. We and the escrow agent performed according to the exact terms of the written agreements.

THE SERVICE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW AGREEMENT IS PART 1 OF A "3 PART" TRANSACTION! I PLACED FUNDS IN AN ESCROW (Austin Escrow and Title, LLC) TO FACILITATE A TRANSACTION
WE'LL CALL THIS SECTION, "PART-1!"

JOHN CAMPBELL WAS SELLING FRED CAMPBELL "MTN'S" AT A PARTICULAR MARKET VALUE! FRED CAMPBELL WOULD BE ABLE TO SELL THESE MTN'S" ON THE OPEN MARKET AT A PROFIT! WE'LL CALL THIS SECTION, "PART-2!"

JOHN CAMPBELL AND RHONDALYN SINGH TANWAR PHD WOULD FUND MY DEVELOPMENT! WE'LL CALL THIS SECTION, "PART-3!"

HERE'S THE PROBLEM, IN THE BEGINNING I DID NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE MTN'S" TRANSACTION (PART-2)! I ONLY KNEW FRED INFORMED ME THAT I HAD TO PLACED FUNDS IN AN ESCROW ACCOUNT! JOHN CAMPBELL WOULD BE ABLE TO FUND MY PROJECT!

WHY I WROTE THIS REPORT ABOUT FRED CAMPBELL
IN THE BEGINNING I DID NOT KNOW THAT THIS WHOLE THING WAS RIDING ON A BUY/SELL TRANSACTION REGARDING MTN'S!

I DID NOT KNOW THAT IF FRED CAMPBELL DO NOT BUY THESE MTN'S" FROM JOHN CAMPBELL THEN THE DEAL IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN! I DID NOT KNOW THAT FRED CAMPBELL ALREADY KNEW HE WAS NOT GOING TO BUY THESE MTN'S" FROM JOHN CAMPBELL! HE SHOULD NOT BE TAKING MONEY UNLESS HE WAS GOING TO GO THROUGH WITH PART-1 & 2!

THUS, WITHOUT "PART 2" IN THIS 3 PART TRANSACTION, YOU CAN NOT GET TO "PART 3!" YOU CAN'T PASS "GO" YOU DO NOT COLLECT $200 HUNDRED DOLLARS! "(MONOPOLY)!"

FRED CAMPBELL CLOSED THE ESCROW AND STATED THE "MTN" HAD NO VALUE! AGAIN I ASK YOU FRED, IF YOU ALREADY KNEW THE NOTES HAD NO VALUE THEN WHY DID YOU TAKE MONEY FROM ME! JOHN CAMPBELL PROVIDED YOU WITH THE DOCUMENTS OUTLINING THE MTN'S"! YOU CONFIRMED RECEIVING THESE DOCUMENT BEFORE I PLACED FUNDS IN THE ESCROW ACCOUNT, THAT WAS NOT SUPPOSE TO CLOSE WITHOUT "PART 2!" YOU SHOULD HAVE CONFIRMED THE VALUE OF THESE MTN'S"! I MEAN WE'RE TALKING $100MILLION DOLLARS WORTH OF MTN'S"!

SO TO RECAP, JOHN CAMPBELL THINKS FRED CAMPBELL IS GOING TO BUY THESE MTN'S, FRED CAMPBELL PROVIDES A SERVICE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW AGREEMENT, I'M DAYS AWAY FROM CLOSING MY DEAL, I PLACE FUNDS IN ESCROW, FRED CAMPBELL, KNOWING HE'S NOT GOING TO BUY THESE MTN'S STILL GOES THROUGH WITH PART-1 AND PART-2, CLOSED THE ESCROW THEN STATES THE MTN'S HAD NO VALUE! JOHN CAMPBELL NOT ABLE TO SELL THE MTN'S TO FRED CAMPBELL HAS TO TRY AND FIND ANOTHER BUYER, NO PART-3! IN THE BEGINNING, I KNEW PART-1 AND PART-3! HAD I KNOWN PART-2 IT IS CLEAR THAT I WOULD HAVE NOT PLACE FUNDS IN AN ESCROW UNLESS FRED CAMPBELL PROVIDED CONFIRMATION THAT HE WOULD BUY THE MTN'S!


IT SHOULD HAVE RECAP LIKE THIS;

FRED BUYS THE MTN'S" FROM JOHN CAMPBELL, JOHN CAMPBELL FUNDS THE PROJECTS, FRED CAMPBELL THEN RESELLS THE MTN'S" ON THE OPEN MARKET ABOVE WHAT HE PAID, EVERYONE WINS!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It was Toney's side of the transaction, the parties that proposed the transaction to him, that failed to perform

I MET FRED CAMPBELL AND JOHN CAMPBELL AT THE SAME TIME ON A CONFERENCE CALL! THEY BOTH SPOKE REGARDING THE TRANSACTION BUT DID NOT TALK ABOUT MTN'S! AT THAT TIME BOTH PARTIES AGREED!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
(the claim that we proposed a transaction to him is completely inaccurate that is not our business).

CORRECTION ABOUT THIS STATEMENT Fred Campbell (USAsset Corporation) mislead me into believing that he was going to do a buy/sell transaction which would allow him to buy MTN's "Medium Term Notes" below market value then turn around the same day and sell them @ a profit!

FRED CAMPBELL DID NOT PROPOSE THE TRANSACTION TO ME! IN THE BEGINNING, I DID NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE MTN'S TRANSACTION! THAT WAS BETWEEN FRED CAMPBELL AND JOHN CAMPBELL! HOWEVER, I DID FIND OUT AFTER THE ESCROW CLOSED! AFTER QUESTIONING WHAT WENT WRONG AND HOW CAN WE MAKE IT RIGHT!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We have given Toney additional chances to perform, at no additional cost, to try to help him.

I CAME TO FRED CAMPBELL WITH A TRANSACTION THAT WOULD ALLOW HIS FUNDS OWNER TO HAVE FUNDS PLACED IN THEIR ACCOUNT, UNDER THEIR CONTROL AND EVEN RECEIVE THE FUNDS AND PAY ME THE DIFFERENCE AND HE TURNED THAT DOWN CLAIMING THE TRANSACTION DID NOT AGREE WITH HIS MOU! HOWEVER, PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE MOU, HE STATED HE WOULD PERFORM, ONCE HE RECEIVED A WORD COPY, NOT FINALS, NO SIGNATURE, OF THIS MOU, HE STARTED CURSING AT ME AND STATING THAT HE'S OUT OF IT AND IF I CALLED HIM AGAIN HE WILL NOT ANSWER MY CALLS AND HE DOESN'T EVEN READ MY EMAILS, HE DELETES THEM!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In any event there are written, signed documents that may be enforced as written, if Toney wants to seek legal relief against us. He has not done so because it is clear that we performed and his side did not. That is why Toney uses the rip-off report.

Chess strategy consists of setting and achieving long-term goals during the game for example, where to place different pieces while opponents concentrate on immediate manoeuvre. These two parts of chess thinking cannot be completely separated, because strategic goals are mostly achieved by the means of tactics, while the tactical opportunities are based on the previous strategy of play.

AS FOR THE LEGAL PART OF IT, I DON'T THINK IT'S WISE TO ASSUME I DO NOT HAVE A TEAM OF LAWYERS!!! JUST NOT WISE...

YOUR MOVE...

Our clients execute a written services agreement and escrow agreement, as did Toney. We and the escrow agent performed according to the exact terms of the written agreements. It was Toney's side of the transaction, the parties that proposed the transaction to him, that failed to perform (the claim that we proposed a transaction to him is completely inaccurate that is not our business). We have given Toney additional chances to perform, at no additional cost, to try to help him. In any event there are written, signed documents that may be enforced as written, if Toney wants to seek legal relief against us. He has not done so because it is clear that we performed and his side did not. That is why Toney uses the rip-off report.
Fred

Our clients execute a written services agreement and escrow agreement, as did Toney. We and the escrow agent performed according to the exact terms of the written agreements. It was Toney's side of the transaction, the parties that proposed the transaction to him, that failed to perform (the claim that we proposed a transaction to him is completely inaccurate that is not our business). We have given Toney additional chances to perform, at no additional cost, to try to help him. In any event there are written, signed documents that may be enforced as written, if Toney wants to seek legal relief against us. He has not done so because it is clear that we performed and his side did not. That is why Toney uses the rip-off report.
Fred

I provided $100,000 in an escrow account that was not suppose to be removed until all was in total agreement regarding a buy /sell transaction! I was told by Fred Campbell personally that no money would leave the account! As soon as the funds hit the escrow, he closed the escrow, took my money and sent me a bunch of useless papers I can't used! I know for a fact that he sent at least one more person the same paper! The papers are from a so-call lawyer who claims to be holding $2mil plus in an account for the so-called purpose of your transaction! QUESTION, how were going to do all these transactions, total of 16 from what I understand, promising $2mil, $3mil even more funds and provided the same account info with the same amount from the same person! A total of $5mil would be needed just from us two! The account only showed $2mil plus! This clearly confirms he did not have the money he claims and the only way he gets his money is by scamming people to believe he will perform a transaction, then they put their funds in an escrow account and nothing happens!
I want the $2million he promised or my money back!