Print the value of index0
  • Report:  #779684

Complaint Review: Invention Home

Invention Home - Jacob Enterprises - James Ray & Associates They took over 9k from me to process a patent I found prior art for 3 years later. Monroeville, Internet

  • Reported By:
    avargas6 — Fremont California United States of America
  • Submitted:
    Thu, September 22, 2011
  • Updated:
    Tue, October 04, 2011

I have spent $9,403 in addition to hosting site fees & over 3 years on an idea that had prior art that was not discovered after a thorough Patent Search was completed by Invention Home. My idea has been reviewed by at least 3 different companies whom over a long span of time drew up the same conclusions I just did 3 years later. These rights belong to Apple Inc.

I am grateful for the Patent Search DVD provided by Inventright which enabled me to find this. I believe Invention Home/Jacob Enterprises & James Ray & Associates should watch it. What I had found, was found under 1 hour on the USPTO website and then confirmed with drawings on Google Patents. I have made Invention Home aware of this matter today and am curious to see how it all pans out. Good business in my perspective would be to give me all of my money back. When you get charged hundreds of dollars for a patent search and there is prior art discovered it is advised to not proceed foward. Invention Home just took my money.

2 Updates & Rebuttals


avargas6

Fremont,
California,
United States of America

James Ray And Associates affiliated with Invention Home

#3Author of original report

Tue, October 04, 2011

James Ray & Associates along with Jacob Enterprises worked together on my idea. I am looking at an invoice from Invention Home for the Patent Search, Provisional Filing Fee, Prov Patent- Special2, Invention Portfolio (Marketing) was $2,999.00, which in the rebuttle has been posted as free and commission only; Audio Commercial, Provisional Filing Fee, Provisional Patent Prep & Porfolio Custom Work- All totalling $4,812.00. In addition, the law firm affiliated with Invention Home, James Ray & Associates, charged me $4,591.00 to file the Utility Patent. I have been fortunate enough to get in touch with Apple Inc & the USPTO's Patent Examiner's Department who are looking into this. I will update my progress.
How do you keep this from happening to you? Educate yourself. Be proactive. Find your own answers and affiliate yourself with companies that assist you with obtaining knowlegde. Knowledge is invaluable. I've had a great exxperience working with Inventright who educated me on doing my own patent search to find what I've found. Only good things happen when you apply knowledge. I was never educated on patents with Invention Home. Their Marketing chart is very vague and it's hard to determine whether their marketing team is making calls on behalf of your idea or generally everyone else's. In my 3 years I've never recieved a call saying they have a company reviewing my idea. In fact, I hired an outside consultant who had my idea reviewed 3 times. Brian Harding of The New Product Consulting. He always kept me in the loop with his progress and was thoroughly disappointed when he found out how much money Invention Home and James Ray and Associates took from me. The word he used was "Unnecessary".


Opsmgr

Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania,
USA

Company Response

#3UPDATE Employee

Tue, October 04, 2011

Hello, I am the Director of Customer Operations for InventionHome.  Id like to address and clarify this post, which I believe is misleading and not a true reflection of the actual process or our business practice.
 
First, please understand that our company takes every situation like this very serious and we put a tremendous amount of effort and value into total customer service and satisfaction.  We work with inventors and entrepreneurs from all over the world and have working relationships with thousands of companies across North America who are looking for innovative products. Additionally, we have an extremely high customer satisfaction rating and we receive a tremendous amount of customer testimonials after going through our process.   We have already been in contact with this inventor to resolve the issue.  
 
In regards to this post, please consider the following
 
This post implied that over $9k was spent with our company on a patent application.  This is not true.  The actual services requested were far more than just a patent application and the overall expense for all of these services combined was less than half of the $9k posted.  Our company completed multiple services meeting the requirements and approval of the inventor including; a patent search, provisional patent application, invention portfolio website, virtual design images, virtual prototype with animation, custom design work and audio production.
 
Furthermore, this customer opted into our marketing and licensing program, which was available at no cost (commission only).
 
Unfortunately, the patent issue is not as black and white as the customer is making it to be.  First, there is a difference between patentability and infringement.  Infringement analysis is far more complicated and is not something that our company does or offers.  Therefore, to make a claim that the invention infringes another patent is not something that can be determined easily.  Next, the patent firm mentioned in this post is a completely separate company from ours.  Furthermore, one year after the original search, the inventor filed a non-provisional patent application with that patent firm and would have worked with them to re-evaluate whether to file or not.   
 
Finally, keep in mind that the patent application filed hasnt even been reviewed by the USPTO, which means it hasnt been accepted or rejected yet.  

Respond to this Report!