Jacqueline Goodman , Joseph Anthony Jaime Attonery Information Used With out Permission, Not Represented BY ATTORNEY LISTED IN COMPLAINT, FALSE PROOF OF SERVICE Fullerton California
Seems that Attorney Jacequline Goodman is involved with a criminal enterprise known as Joseph Anthony Jaime, Eric Jonathan Wolfe, of Fullerton, CA. She allows them to use her BAR Information to file civil suits, when she is in fact a criminal defense attorney. Jaime, and Wolfe file civil suits using BAR information to get past the complaint filing, immediately file for default judgment, because proof of service is always falsified, even if you show up ( because you monitor the CA SUPERIOR COURT occourts.org) you will still have go against falsified documents, and they are getting away with it. We all can't afford attorneys, but these criminals know how to make you look like a fool in court /Here is an example of the injustice, attorney used is not civil attorney, occourts.org case # 30-2013-00628674-CU-HR-NJC, Defendant was not even in the county or city where he was allegedly served,and di not even know of the hearing, so there is default judgment given. in the mean time both parties were in a civil trial, and plaintiff failed to mention to court, or defendant that there was already a civil harassment case filed, or heard. He is (Joseph Jaime) a criminal, a dirt bag, liar, and con artist who conned his family into a loan on his father's house, then conned Josh Van Tilborg to finance and payoff his debt, then took the money that was his (Josh), and filed a police report against him for trying to get part of his money back, and then a civil suite against Josh's loved ones for part of the money he got back. All of which he files falsified proof of service, so he can just get defaulted judgment, which registered actions show his premature filings over, and over again. But still the judge that is worried about going on vacation in time of the hearing is swift to find some bullshit in Jaime's case, but not enough when all he did is lie, and the defense could not get any witnesses to show up because they were threatened with civil suits as well.
So Why is Attorney Jacequline Goodman used in a civil complaint when she is a defense attorney? When her Office state "we don not do civil filings"? Why isn't she returning calls, and explaining what she will do about this matter? Why is she conspiring with criminals subject to Grand Jury Indictment in the next following weeks?
5 Updates & Rebuttals
Conflicting Testimony
Nebraska,Updated Evidence, and much more, computers recovered, Thanks!
#6REBUTTAL Individual responds
Thu, May 23, 2013
This is the evidence that corroborates the above. More to come.
Conflicting Testimony
Back to Mamas House,Nebraska,
Conflicting Testimony. Stay away fron Drugs.
#6UPDATE Employee ..inside information
Thu, May 16, 2013
Oh thank you secret moderator! I'm exonerated! So I'll proceed to send this to Hoon Chang for prosecution for violating your restraining order and probation. Or, you must be Kimberly Vantilborg because thats the IP address that appears. So your testimony to the grand jury pertained to exactly when? Before or after 2007? See Vantilborg's testimony provided from Judge Derek Hunt, under the judges direct examination, below. Exactly when are the dates? Would you like judge Hunt's assistance to recall before you answer? Was it 2007? Or 2010 when you stole 77 Anna Street? Or was it 2011?
Testimony to Judge Hunt:
THE COURT: And what is your relationship with them
now?
MR. VAN TILBORG: I do not have a relationship with
them.
THE COURT: Okay. During what period of time, did
you have a relationship with Fidelity Keegan?
MR. VAN TILBORG: From 2005 -- I don't recall the month -- 2005 until I want to say 2007, late 2007.
THE COURT: So you were using your desk at Fidelity
Keegan through the 2010-2011 period?
MR. VAN TILBORG: Um, up until I'd say October 2011.
Original Testimony - See pictures 1 and 2.
Subpoenaed and received payoffs for 77 Anna Street to PRS, signed and countersigned, see the pictures. Cannot figure out why Vantilborg maintains that this property was paid off illegally and manipulated for the bank? Do not see any preclusion against anyone buying this property in the payoff from Ed Hurt, signed and countersigned. Vantilborg must maintain this story to appear as a victim, he has no other choice. Looks like anyone can buy this property, anyone disagree? See pictures 3 and 4.
Joseph was not involved in the transaction whatsoever? Was this in January 2010? April 2010? May 2010?
Testimony to Judge Hunt:
MR. VAN TILBORG: No, your Honor. Joseph Jamie was
not involved.
THE COURT: Excuse me?
MR. VAN TILBORG: Pardon me. Joseph Jamie was not
involved in this transaction whatsoever.
Original Testimony - See pictures 5, 6, 7.
Your purchase in May 2010 saved the property? Because it looks like the property was paid off in January 2010 by 77 Anna LLC, and Joe obtained the Tax I.D. In April of 2010. You closed your transaction in May 2010? This was the transfer from 77 Anna LLC to your Alias as member, J Van Tilborg, correct? So you are 50% personally liable for the original debt ($100k)? Why would a Member sign a home with LLC title over to himself personally? No consideration? And why the alias “J Van Tilborg”? Oh and this was a refinance, not the original payoff.
Testimony to Judge Hunt:
THE COURT: You went on title on this property in
Watsonville?
MR. VAN TILBORG: Yes, I did.
THE COURT: In your own name?
MR. VAN TILBORG: Too, with the company name and my
name.
THE COURT: The company name being the address of
the property?
MR. VAN TILBORG: Yes, your Honor.
THE COURT: When did the transaction close?
MR. VAN TILBORG: May 15th, 2010.
Original Testimony - See pictures 8, 9, 10.
MYTH: This property is or was ever owned by Vantilborg.
FACT: Vantilborg must maintain this lie. Gerard Menacucci under deposition, “I used to try and get a hold of Josh and could never talk to him, and it used to piss me off, because Mitch [Valmer] could always talk with him but I never could”. Gerard goes on to say “I want nothing to do with this loan, Josh signed everything and Mitch did all the paperwork and I just want nothing to do with it”. Recorded Testimony.
This testimony is regarding Vantilborg's new loan for $160,000 which was obtained fraudulently with his conspirator Mitch Valmer of Emoney Lending and George Grosek the broker. Gerard, it seems, knew nothing about Vantilborg's insistenace that there be no appraisal, and no contact with anyone because the transaction would be revealed and put to a stop immediately. This is the true story, there are no other versions that are true. Would you like some more?
Grand Jury Indictment FACT
Fullerton,California,
RETRACTION of POSTING
#6Author of original report
Wed, May 15, 2013
After speaking with Jacqueline Goodman, I found that she did not represent Mr. Jaime in the civil matter. Using an attorney's information on the cover page of a complaint is not a criminal act unless they sign for the attorney, or represent themselves as the attorney in court.
Therefore, I retract my previous posting of her involvement with Mr. Jaime.
Grand Jury Indictment FACT
Fullerton,California,
More to Come to Light
#6Author of original report
Wed, May 08, 2013
Flag this message
Joseph Jaime
I did attempt to return your call to no avail.
Are you represented by counsel? A telephone number for a purported FBI agent was left for me but I have not been able to speak with any such agent. Please have the agent or your counsel call me to discuss. My cell number is widely available online and on the office message for emergencies and I have an able staff available throughout the day. 714-879-5770. 714-612-7865.
Jacquie www.californiadefenselawyer.net
Please excuse any typos Sent from my iPhone
Grand Jury Indictment FACT
Fullerton,California,
FACTS
#6Author of original report
Wed, May 08, 2013
Flag this message
Joseph Jaime
I did attempt to return your call to no avail.
Are you represented by counsel? A telephone number for a purported FBI agent was left for me but I have not been able to speak with any such agent. Please have the agent or your counsel call me to discuss. My cell number is widely available online and on the office message for emergencies and I have an able staff available throughout the day. 714-879-5770. 714-612-7865.
Jacquie www.californiadefenselawyer.net
Please excuse any typos Sent from my iPhone