Print the value of index0
  • Report:  #287019

Complaint Review: Jim Morganalso Known As Drews)And Jan Windglows

Jim Morgan,also Known As Drews, And Jan Windglows Satan Worshiper:Jim Morgan he performs DEATH spells, sacrifices live animals, uses own blood and is truely one of the most frightening people to meet. Driggs Idaho

  • Reported By:
    Pittsburg Pennsylvania
  • Submitted:
    Tue, November 27, 2007
  • Updated:
    Tue, January 31, 2012
  • Jim Morgan,also Known As Drews),And Jan Windglows
    PO Box 712
    Driggs, Idaho
    U.S.A.
  • Phone:
    208-639-2224
  • Category:
*Consumer Comment: MONKEY MARY Honest Lieing Person PRANTIL HERE'S THE PROOF *Consumer Comment: CRIMINAL RECORDS ON MARY T. PRANTIL Astoria NY 11106 3285 33 rd Street Apt C-2 DO NOT PERFORM SPELLS FOR MARY T. PRANTIL RIP OFF ARTIST WON'T PAY YOU *Consumer Comment: Jim Morgan is a HARASSING Clients;posting false reports;And is being investigated by Dept of Justice *Consumer Comment: LET THEM INVESTIGATE MARY PRANTIL *Consumer Suggestion: What goes around, comes around For Mary *Consumer Suggestion: Ending to the Prantil. Cahill Scandal. FAKE MAGICK MAGIC SITE * : Scam - Jim Morgan - NOT WIZARD - NO Magical Powers Basic Con-Artist Scamming thousands of dollars off innocent people * : Scam - Jim Morgan - NOT A WIZARD - NO Magical Powers Basic Con-Artist Scamming thousands of dollars off innocent people *Consumer Suggestion: BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists/Internet Predators James Morgan and Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com-Breach Client Confidentiality,NOT Spellcasters or Psychics,Scam clients for CASH *UPDATE EX-employee responds: SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Owner of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 WARNING: www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com PO Box #712 Idaho, Driggs, 83422 . DO NOT USE!! *Consumer Comment: remember *Consumer Comment: Mary Prantil Mary Praintil Mary Theresa Prantil Mary T. Prantil Mary T. Prantil grew up learning how to be a criminal from her father crooked attorney Frank G. Prantil The Real Truth is Here *Consumer Suggestion: Admit defeat Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan! Mary T Prantil does not have a Criminal Record and infact ddi not let you rip her off for $5000. Jan Windglows commits LARCENY daily on the Global Internet *Consumer Comment: ..../Mary-T-Prantil/UTTER-disgrace-to-Corporate-America/Mary-T-Praintil/Shames-The-Constitution-Of-The-United-States-Of-America/Mary-T-Prantil-SMEARS-her-family-name-all-over-the-Internet/ *General Comment: Mary Prantil AKA Honest Person Of Astoria New York Is Caught Red Handed In Scams *General Comment: RE: Honest Person in PA *Consumer Comment: CRIMINAL MARY THERESA PRANTIL'S NEW YORK CRIMINAL RECORDS BELOW *Consumer Comment: Thank You For Your Kind Words Poster, PLEASE SEE CURRENT CRIMINAL RECORDS OF MARY T PRANTIL AKA Honest Person *Consumer Comment: Scams Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan Coven of Convicted Criminals DO NOT USE www.bloodloveandlustspells.com *REBUTTAL Individual responds: EASY TO VIEW CRIMINAL RECORDS ON MARY T. PRANTIL Complaints - CYBER STALKING & PAY PAL WIRE FRAUD *Consumer Comment: Jan Windglows sound like a CREEP covering up life of CRIME... *REBUTTAL Individual responds: This report is concerning Frank George Prantil and his CRIMINAL daughter Mary Teresa Prantil. *Consumer Comment: Jan Windglows aka Mystical Jan CRIMINAL for DECEPTION FRAUD - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com *REBUTTAL Individual responds: TRASH MOUTH MARY PRANTIL OF ASTORIA NEW YORK IS EXPOSED AS A CRIMINAL, LEARN THE LAW IDIOT BEFORE YOU MAKE A a*s OUT OF YOURSELF ON THE FOURMS *Consumer Comment: Verified Criminal Jan Windglows -DO NOT USE www.bloodloveandlustspells.com JAN on the LAM *Consumer Comment: Proof with links provided of Mary Prantil and her crime ridden relatives *UPDATE EX-employee responds: Verified CRIMINAL SCAM Jan Windglows CYBER STALKS-X-employees and Clients *Consumer Suggestion: BOYCOTT Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan also known as DREWS - Spell Casting is NOT a legitimate Business *Consumer Suggestion: Jan Windglows is a Cyber SCAM, Verified criminal, and Cyber Stalker -owner of several scam "spell casting" websites to lure you with a free psychic reading then direct you to a fake "SPELLS". *REBUTTAL Individual responds: Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan NOT Affliated With Michael Jenkins OR Any Other Casters Slap A HUGE Civil Lawsuit On Malicious Poster Mary Prantil

Jim Morgan(also known as Drews) and Jan Windglows.

DO NOT USE: Jim Morgan he perforrms DEATH spells, sacrifices live animals, uses own blood and is truely one of the most frightening people to meet.

Truly evil person nad site...do not use.

Honestperson
Pittsburg, Pennsylvania
U.S.A.

30 Updates & Rebuttals


High Enchantress Jan Windglows

Internet,
USA

Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan NOT Affliated With Michael Jenkins OR Any Other Casters Slap A HUGE Civil Lawsuit On Malicious Poster Mary Prantil

#31REBUTTAL Individual responds

Tue, January 31, 2012

Mary Prantil has a life long criminal career and currently has nine criminal charges she is on trial for, and one in Nevada. Mary Prantil uses dozens of Spell Casters to help her attain her wishes, then commits haneous acts to mess up her spell results, then blames her messed up life on the Spell Casters that have helped her. Mary Prantil messes up her life and alienates everyone around her including her own family, while blaming everyone for everything that has gone wrong in her life because of her own evil deeds against innocent people.

Mary Prantil is broke, lost her inheritance after sponging and taking advantage of her family and mother for years on end while continuing her SCAMMING CRIME SPREE to hurt innocent people, Spell Casters and ANYONE that does not agree with her. Mary Prantil refuses to take responsibility for her OWN actions but instead blames her shortcomings on other innocent people who have tried to help her, then calls them SCAM.

Top Spell Caster Jan Windglows SUES Mary Prantil because Mary Prantil cannot and will not stop stalking and harrassing Jan Windglows and her husband. Mary Prantil had it coming for years. Mary Prantil sends Jan Windglows a letter of EXTORTION threatening Jan Windglows. Mary Prantil stalks Spell Casters, and other different types of celebrities, comedians, etc. in her weak sick efforts of her so called "claim to fame" while using her crimes and abuse to continue to harass spell casters, other high profile people, writing lie after lie in her hateful crime spree against innocent people.

READ THE LAWSUIT- this is how stalkers SHOULD be handled, because that is the only way to get through to them, by sending them to JAIL where they will not hurt themselves or others. WE HAVE SUED Mary Prantil due to her long term criminal history of stalking and abusing us. If she does not get that or understand that, it is ok because she is on her way to jail anyway, why? BECAUSE MARY PRANTIL IS A HARD CORE CRIMINAL and does not know any other way except for her sick life of crime against innocent people and business.

Now that Mary Prantil is getting her BUTT KICKED by us, she is angry and continues to post lies about us but we REFUSE to back down from trash like her. Mary Prantil is a low life criminal who is better off when she is locked up and out of society because she will never be capable of being any type of honest or decent person that is able to make any type of positive contribution to society. This is Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan posting the lawsuit that we won on scum scammer

CRIMINAL Mary Prantil just for the record. Stalker Mary Prantil belongs in prison. She is doing this to several other people as well, as she prides herself in harassing other people and businesses. Mary Prantil, the malicious poster here filed numerous frivilous lawsuits on New York, PLUS the New York Police Department that were thrown out of court. Currently we are telling everyone about the criminal she is, including Mayor Bloomberg. Posting hateful untrue malicious comments is one of Mary Prantil's favorite hobbies. So, here is the summons we served on Prantil, and the lawsuit.

She never even had the nerve to show up for the court hearing. See the attached files on the next page of us serving Mary Prantil a summons. You can view the full records, and actual lawsuit via this link, as it is too many pages to post here. Just click the link and then see the file here for the court summons and law suit first pages.

Mary Prantil's criminal records can also be seen at this link.

http://www.mary-prantil.com/readlawsuithere.html

Sincerely, Enchantress Janhett T. Windglows
http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com
208-714-4348

READ THE LAWSUIT ON MARY PRANTIL WITH OTHER LINKS AND INFORMATION FOUND THERE THAT CONTAIN HARD EVIDENCE ON MARY PRANTIL'S NUMEROUS FRIVILOUS LAWSUITS SHE HAS FILED AGAINST NEW YORK AND THE NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT NYC WHICH IS THE CITY SHE PROFESSES TO LOVE SO MUCH BUT IS FILING LAWSUITS ON AND SCAMMING, RIPPING OFF HONEST HARD WORKING NEW YORK TAX PAYERS BY RIDING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR YEARS ON END.


PsychicINSeattle

Tacoma,
Washington,
United States of America

Jan Windglows is a Cyber SCAM, Verified criminal, and Cyber Stalker -owner of several scam "spell casting" websites to lure you with a free psychic reading then direct you to a fake "SPELLS".

#31Consumer Suggestion

Mon, June 13, 2011

June 13, 2011 Jan Windglows is a Cyber SCAM, Verified criminal, and
Cyber Stalker -owner of several scam "spell casting" websites to lure you with a free psychic reading then direct you to a fake "SPELLS".  DO NOT USE: www.bloodloveandlustspells.com Jan Windglows will try to SCAM a lot of MONEY for Witchcraft, not perform the spells, take your $1000s then go to the next victim to SCAM. Jan Windglows is a common THEIF.
 
TURN TO GOD! NO SUCH THING-WITCHCRAFT IS A AGAINST DIVINITY AND GOD. DO NOT USE. RIPOFF SITES:
www.bloodloveandlustspells.com, www.dragonspells.com, www.angelicseals.com, DO NOT USE: Scammers Jan Windglows, Jim Morgan, Mike Cahill, This coven of criminals work together to scam you of $1000,s thru "free psychic reading" to buy their "spells" this is DECEPTION FRAUD and it is a real Crime. DO NOT USE: Jan Windglows of SCAM Rip-off site: Blood, Love and Lust Spells.Ph: 208-714-4348. PO Box 118, Bonners Ferry, Idaho Jan Windglows is a Rip-off SCAM who only will do you spiritual harm. Turn to God.

Witchcraft is a SCAM. I am Psychic in Seattle. I posted a couple of reports
on Rip-off Report.com after many X-clients of Jan Windglows came to me
for real spiritual guidance after getting ripped off
by www.bloodloveandlustspells.com Please read the pathetic responses to
my former reports all phony names Jan Windglows aka Janhett T. Windglows aka Enchantress Jan 208 - These SCAMMERS will never use their real names because they are not real.  The work they do is a criminal rip-off thru Western Union.  They make money by lying to anyone who seeks their services.

They prey on people like vampires; they talk about blood and killing people, death spells, and destruction of people, murder. Lucifer is talking to you through each of them. In the bible a Dragon is the name for Lucifer among many others.  Jan Windglows, Jim Morgan and Mike Cahill follow all the directives of Lucifer the Devil.

I tell all my clients, that every human being has psychic abilities innately
part of your soul. When you pray to God tell Him what you want.  God
will always grant His children what they need. No need for "spells" or any such negative forces.  God is positive. Murder and the taking of any life are against the precepts of His Sacred Word.  Jan Windglows, Jim Morgan, and Mike Cahill are an abomination of His Word.  

Every human being has weaknesses, Jan Windglows, Jim Morgan and Mike Cahill will find these weakness or vulnerability and like the Vampires that they are they will prey upon you and rob you of your money and dignity.  You will never see proof of any stupid "spell" they charge you money to
create as they only defraud you of as they don't cast any "spells".

Once they have your information through your free psychic "reading"
they have a script ready to go and "fake spell offers" that are all
scripted to rip you off.  Jan Windglows, Jim Morgan and Mike Cahill have
been in business for years and rely on the fact that once they have ripped
off a "client" that person is too embarrassed to admit to being
taken in by these phonies, doesn't tell anyone, doesn't report them to the
police DECEPTION FRAUD counts on your reaction to silence to profit and
continue to exist to rip off more people every day. DO NOT USE: Jan Windglows of SCAM Rip-off site: Blood, Love and Lust Spells.Ph: 208-714-4348. PO Box 118, Bonners Ferry, Idaho Jan Windglows is a Rip-off SCAM who only will do you spiritual harm. Turn to God. Witchcraft is a SCAM.

I am praying for each and every person that has been victimized by Jan
Windglows, Jim Morgan and Mike Cahill of  ww.bloodloveandlustspells.com,
www.dragonspells.com, www.angelicseals.com, They do not speak to any
Angels or any Divinity, Entity.  God condems witchcraft, spells and
the work of these scammers. Jan Windglows, Jim Morgan and Mike Cahill are committing Deception Fraud, which is a real crime punishable by a conviction, criminal records and jail time.  If they could be found, please understand they offer no real name, addresses or phone numbers that are traceable, because they are professional criminals and scammers all working together and with other in their criminal coven.  God help them when their Karma is paid in full.  No one escapes Karma, God is aware of all you do and say and Justice is the Lord's. "Vengeance is mine said the Lord"

God bless you children of the Lord. God is your Salvation, your Hope and the Light of God. God will forgive you and loves you unconditionally. Turn
to God. Witchcraft is a SCAM. Jan Windglows will only do you spiritual harm. I pray for all my clients that have been previously scammed and harmed by Jan Windglows.  

Turn to the light of God within in you. 

Love PsychicNSeattle

JanWindglows-IS-EVIL@PsychicNSeattle Seattle, Washington Turn to God not Witchcraft. CRIMINAL Jan Windglows owns Rip-off Witchcraft site, Blood, Love, & Lust Spells.http://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/jan-windglows.aspx  www.ashrinetoqueenlilith.net is Evidence of Jan Windglows stalking an X client for years. www.ashrinetoqueenlilith.net
could be you if you do business with Jan Windglows.

JanWindglows-IS-EVIL Prayer is FREE-God does not charge MONEY for his
LOVE. Turn to God & the Magic within your soul. PEACE http://twitter.com/#!/PSYCHICNSEATTLE 

JanWindglows-IS-EVIL Happy June 7, 2011 DO NOT PARTAKE in WITCHCRAFT. There is severe Karmic backlash Follow me on my Twitter @PsychicNSeattle PsychicNSeattle JanWindglows-IS-EVIL Victims of Jan Windglows call Sheriff Greg Sprungl @ 208 267 3151 report all scams by this phony spellcaster check the Most Wanted list

JanWindglows-IS-EVIL Victims of Jan Windglows report all fraud to
www.boundarycountyid.org or call 208 267 3151 file your complaint STOP CRIME JanWindglows-IS-EVIL Jan Windglows I believe nothing is real about you or any computer site. Probably in prison with nothing else to do 

JanWindglows-IS-EVIL 6/8 Jan Windglows Psycho in Bonners Ferry, Life of
crime, Witchcraft, phony spells, Extortionist, Identity Theft. Wanted for
Grand Larceny PsychicNSeattle JanWindglows-IS-EVIL If monster SCAM Jan Windglows ripped you off then file police complaint with your local police, like I tell all of my Jan Windglows victims JanWindglows-IS-EVIL Turn to God not Jan Windglows who is hurting God's children by stealing their money. http://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/Jan-Windglows

PsychicNSeattle JanWindglows-IS-EVIL Godly Psychic Healers &
Psychic Readers. Cyber SCAM Jan Windglows is scamming people $1000's and has continued to commit Deception Fraud.
 
PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER
@PsychicNSeattle
 
Hello: I am Psychic IN Seattle and no one else. 
 
God's Healing energy to you.  I believe in God. I am a Psychic of God's Light. I am doing God's work. God's love is all you need to manifest your dreams in this lifetime. Praying to God is powerful. Turn to God.

I pray all my clients turn to God not Witchcraft or SCAM Jan Windglows.
Witchcraft is EVIL. Cyber SCAM Jan Windglows owns a Black Magic Witchcraft  Rip-off Site Blood, Love and Lust Spells.  Many of my clients
have been scammed $1000's by SCAM Jan Windglows so I am defending God's principles, my many clients, the law of Karma and my morals as a God centered Psychic.

 Psalms 23:1 The Lord is my shepherd; there is nothing I lack. I created my profile after hearing scam story after scam story from so many of my clients that have been scammed $1000's by Jan Windglows. All said Jan Windglows Black Magic Witchcraft spells did not work.  SCAM Jan Windglows uses fake alias, fake websites, all to commit Deception Fraud.
SCAM Jan Windglows give all Psychics of God's light a bad name.  BEWARE
of SCAM Jan Windglows, who has a Criminal Record for Deception Fraud, Grand Larceny and Cyber Identity Theft. https://profiles.google.com/u/0/101443660197371199257/about?hl=en&tab=bh
 
God is our source. Witchcraft is of SATAN. Evil begets EVIL. Jan
Windglows is EVIL. Read real complaints about Cyber  SCAM http://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/jan-windglows.aspx
 
I offer FREE Psychic Readings and Psychic Healings. I believe in God. I am a Psychic of God's Light. I am doing God's work. I only take clients by referral. You can reach me on my Twitter Forum at: http://twitter.com/PsychicNSeattle 

Jan Windglows is EVIL.
 
Turn to God not Witchcraft or Cyber SCAM Jan Windglows.  God and Divinity are against Witchcraft. 
 
Love,
 
Psychic IN Seattle
 
JanWindglows-IS-EVIL
@PsychicNSeattle Seattle, Washington
Healing energy to you. Turn to God not Witchcraft or SCAM Jan
Windglows. Witchcraft is EVIL. Jan Windglows owns Black Magic Rip-off Site Blood,Love&LustSpells!
http://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/jan-windglows.aspx
 
Isaiah 54:17 No weapon that is formed against you will prosper; And every tongue that accuses you in judgment God will condemn.
 
Psalms 91: 14 Whoever clings to me I will deliver; whoever knows my name I will set on high.  KEEP TURNING TO GODWITCHCRAFT IS A SCAMGODS  HEALING ENERGY TO YOU.
 
   June 13, 2011 --Jan Windglows is a Cyber SCAM, Verified criminal, and
Cyber Stalker -owner of several scam "spell casting" websites to lure you with a free psychic reading then direct you to a fake "SPELLS".


OpinionatedAmerican

Tampa,
Florida,
USA

BOYCOTT Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan also known as DREWS - Spell Casting is NOT a legitimate Business

#31Consumer Suggestion

Mon, August 16, 2010

SCAMMMERS Jim Morgan, also known as Drews, and Jan Windglows cleary have no clients and devote all their time to Cyber Stalking...Jan Windglows has become so obsessed with harassing Kim Kardashian and many other X-employees and X-clients -Blood Love and Lust Spells is a failing business.

http://twitter.com/JanWindglowSCAM

Spell Casting is not a legitimate Busiemss...beware most Con-Artist are scam Spell Casters...SCAM Jan Windglows is a convicted Criminal form SUMTER Florida JAIL, in 15 yrs on the Internet has NEVER posted a real address for FEAR that the COPS would arrest her...SADISTIC Jim Morganis not an MD or a Police Official...and yet Jimmorgan has written editorial in the 100,000's of pgs - to cover his life of SCAMMING for SPELLS...

http://twitter.com/JanWindglowSCAM

Jim morgan and Jan Windglows - no matter how many lies you come up with...the fact remains you are the CRIMINALS scamming for SPELLS...which is a crime.

 

do not use : Blood Love and Lust Spells now bieng converted to Castel Eye as a result of many polic reports file din 2009 and 2010 for DECEPTION FRAUD...2 by Kim Kardashian...


PsychicHater

Seattle,
Washington,
United States of America

Verified CRIMINAL SCAM Jan Windglows CYBER STALKS-X-employees and Clients

#31UPDATE EX-employee responds

Wed, August 04, 2010

SCAMMER Jan Windglows and her employee, Jim Morgan are Verified CYBER STALKERS and CRIMINALS!!! Do not Use: www.bloodloveandlustspells.com


http://twitter.com/JanWindglowSCAM - it a verified Criminal wanted by the SUMTER Florida POLICE for violating her Sentence and Probation for DECEPTION FRAUD, IDENTITY THEFT and GRAND LARCENY!!!!


SCAM Jan Windglows does NOT post real address because Jan Windglows is a Verified CRIMINAL: 


PO Box #118
Bonners Ferry, Idaho
208-714-4348
passionspells@aol.com
wizardmorgan2@aol.com - both of these emails are contaminated and will download TROJAN VIRUS into your home computer then STEAL your MONEY!!!


Mike Cahill, Spell Caster says: I worked for SCAM Jan Windglows - her SPELLS DON"T WORK becasue Jan on the LAM is a Con-artist that just takes money and does no work.


Celeste Morgan X-wife of Jim Morgansays:  My X-husband Jim Morgan is a Verified Criminal for TAX Evasion.  I had to get a Restraining Order on Jim Morgan for Domestic Violence.


Kim Thrasher -Employee says:  I work for SCAM Jan Windglows now. I get alot of Psychic Reading referrals from Jan Windglows - and all clients complain to me about Jan Windglows.


 


DECEPTION FRAUD is a REAL CRIME - For example: For $5000 I will reunite you withyour X-wife.  Everytime SCAM Jan Windglows offers to do a SPELL for MONEY - Scam Jan Windglows is committing a CRIME.  http;//twitter.com/JanWindglowSCAM


SPELLS DON'T WORK!!!!


http://twitter.com/JanWindgl


do not tread on me

Astoria,
New York,
USA

Proof with links provided of Mary Prantil and her crime ridden relatives

#31Consumer Comment

Fri, July 30, 2010

Hello to all who read this- this is Enchantress Jan Windglows, owner and successful entrepreneur of my  beautiful web site, www.bloodloveandlustspells.com
 
The person above posting against us on the Internet is a deluded woman from New York facing a lot of criminal charges, named Mary Prantil. 
 
We expect her to be thrown in jail this October hopefully sooner.  She is a liar and blabber mouth, as everyone can see, and a garbage mouth as well.  
 
Every time she emails or calls us, we simply send her threatening emails and phone calls to the attorney in New York currently prosecuting her.
 
Mary Prantil is our "pet psycho" so to speak. Hello, Mary !  My husband James and I are here in Bonners Ferry Idaho, anyone can call us- our phone number is 208-714-4348, just like it says on our web sites. 
 
Mary would LOVE to have our home residential address so she can make more trouble for us, but that will never happen.  This is precisely why business owners have post office boxes- to avoid psychotic people like Mary of course, LOL.
 
You see, Mary is MAD because when we did her spell work, the spells WORKED, her boyfriend wanted to marry her, and then Mary messed up and drove her boyfriend off, and she has been blaming all her messed up agenda on us ever since.
 
She also has some kind of psychotic thing going where she makes up outlandish stories about other people about the same things that are happening in HER life, lol.  The woman needs to be put away, committed, locked up for the rest of her life.  She is 46 years old and still all she can do is try to make trouble for innocent people.
 
My husband James spent countless hours on the phone helping this woman.  She did receive her spell results.  She messed up her life.  Oh, well !  I have no control over what this crazy woman did to her own life and we will not back down from her and will continue to help put her behind bars.
 
So in closing, Mary is a very unhappy person, constantly blaming her own self adversities on innocent other people.  And my husband and I are not the only ones- Mary Prantil has SEVERAL people in New York that have pressed charges on her and are waiting for her to be prosecuted.
 
For future reference, my husband and I will continue to run our very reputable and innocent highly successful business and continnue to defend ourselves, no matter WHAT Mary Prantil says.
 
We know who we are, and we know who Mary Prantil is.
 
Give me a call if any questions.  By the way, I see Mary had to actually write a long story of lies about me since she did a background check and could not find anything on MY record, lol.
 
Mary Prantil certainly has PLENTY of garbage racked up against her huh?  Just think here is a woman 46 years old that will never be a responsible adult or lead a positive productive life.  But that is her problem now, and she has Divinity to answer for, for all her misdeeds and her many lies and crimes.
 
The comical thing about all of this is, nobody CARES what Mary Prantil writes or says.  She is a liar and nobody or any of my cleints EVER ask me who Mary Prantil even IS.
 
All the stories that Prantil fabricates about us are garbage, as we have stated many times.  My husband and I are very successful honest people and we are not ruffled by anything Mary Prantil says because all she is doing at this point is taking up bandwidth that someone else who has something important to say could be using up here, lol.
 
Concerning my home address- Mary is the reason I will never disclose my residential address.  I do not need her crazy as_ showing up in my neighborhood, LOL.  Anyone reading these threads would feel the same.
 

Take care and be blessed everyone, call me and come visit my website I have nothing to hide, lol.  Come and see the new beautiful altar my husband James and I have built to bring glory to Divinity. 
 

In Divinity's Service,
Enchantress Janhett T. Windglows
www.bloodloveandlustspells.com
208-714-4348
 
This report is concerning Frank George Prantil and his daughter Mary Theresa Prantil.  In past reports authored by Miss Prantil, she has stated that " I'm proud to have been the daughter of Frank G. Prantil" and that she again "comes from a "PRESTIGIOUS"  family based in the San Diego there in the state of California.
 
I can't speak for the character of the rest of her family as I don't personally know them however, I have no reason to believe them to be anything other then reasonable and law abiding people however, I can relay what I've read from credible sources such as transcripts from the Supreme Court, Colleges of Frank Prantil, Attorney Generals office, State Attorneys office legal sites etc pertaining to Frank G. Prantil.
 
Miss Prantil has stated that "My father got off lots of criminals" then latter went on to say: "My father got off lots of criminals and innocent people to", LOL. Well, I'm sure he did successfully defend some innocent people along the way but from the looks of it, he also was instrumental in successfully defending the trash of society such as Murders, Child Molesters, Check Forgers, Bank Robbers etc. Upon researching the records and past legal performance of Mr. Prantil, I was also informed that not only was he successful in defending the scum of humanity on several occasions but went on to be completely corrupted by the same criminals that he had been representing throughout his practice.
 
It was in my research sited below,  did I run across several charges launched against Frank G. Prantil via the Supreme and Superior court system there in California, such infractions as Perjury, Drug Poisson, Drug Abuse, Unlawfully removing $700,000 from a Clients safe as she sat in jail awaiting a murder trial and so fourth. Mr. Prantil also had interfered with the homicide trial by becoming personally involved with his Client of that same murder trial by attempting to cover for the accused so he could recover his fees. Prantil lied blatantly on several occasions and attempted to hold up the due process of law by filling one frivolous motion of delay right after another just like Mary in the current charges being lodged against her by the State of New York.
 
Frank Prantil was known as a greedy individual who would stop at nothing to accomplish his goals be they of a positive or unethical nature, JUST LIKE Mary T. Prantil his daughter, He was considered out spoken, brazened, and ruthless just like his daughter Mary T. Prantil Internet Terrorist Extraordinaire. So in essence and according to other legal professionals, Frank Prantil was nothing but a GREEDY UNETHICAL Attorney that happened to like the spotlight just like Mary. Another thing I'd like to add here. Did you know that Frank G. Prantil was in and out of rehab centers for his uncontrolled use of illegal narcotics ?, Did you know that he was imprisoned for 14 months for not only botching a homicide trial, but for being an Accomplice to check FORGERY in the commission of that crime.
 
As you can read in the research below, Mr. Prantil wasn't considered a professional on any level by the courts or his peers. Mr. Prantil was DISBARRED twice for drug, unethical activity, and leaving his Clients holding the bag simply because they ran out of money in the middle of their defense. Does any of this sound familiar ?, Does it sound like anything Miss Mary T. Prantil has done in the past ?, I would say that Little Mary is the preverbal apple that didn't fall very far from the tree, wouldn't you say ?  Well, Frank Prantil won't be bothering, SCAMMING, or ripping off his Clients any more because he's now deceased. Good Riddance I say.
 
Now, we have little Mary carrying on his legacy with all of her criminal activities such as you can view below after her fathers information. Please view the facts below coming from the Experts and those that had the misfortune of dealing with him first hand. Sounds like a real Gypsy Scum Ball to me. Read the history of this Idiot and be SHOCKED and then read about the exploits of his daughter little miss marry low life prantil, people like this should just be locked away forever and kept from wasting the courts time and resources.
 
 

High Court Closes Book on Colorful Legal Career

SAN DIEGO At Largehttp://articles.latimes.com/1989-03-31/local/me-603_1_high-court

March 31, 1989|ANTHONY PERRY

The California Supreme Court has quietly ended one of San Diego County's more clamorous legal careers.

The court this month upheld the disbarment of Frank George Prantil, a well-known attorney and aspiring politician before being convicted of perjury and forgery charges and spending 14 months in prison.

"At one time, he was considered one of the county's top defense attorneys," said attorney Eugene Iredale, who once represented Prantil. "Somehow his life just fell apart on him."

Now living outside Sacramento, the 51-year-old Prantil said he was "devastated" by the court's rejection of his plea that he was unfairly convicted. And he repeated his oft-made accusation that he was victimized because of his maverick ways.

"I'm a victim of the war on drugs," Prantil said. "The prosecutors and the courts can't stand it when someone insists that all defendants have rights."

In nearly two decades as a practicing attorney, the San Diego native was never far from the headlines. He won several high-publicity felony cases and big-money damage suits. He defended a San Diego councilman indicted in the Yellow Cab scandal.

Reporters loved his flamboyant rhetoric (he favored Shakespeare and the classics) and brash attire (he wore an American flag tie to court). His practice boomed. He moved from East County to a comfortable spread in La Jolla.

But there were also political defeats, angry public disputes, money problems and his final slide into Vacaville state prison. He concedes now that alcohol and marijuana played a role in his difficulties.

He lost races for Congress (1968), district attorney (1970) and El Cajon Municipal Court (1978). The County Bar Assn. branded him as unqualified. The State Bar in 1979 suspended him for six months for misusing a client's money.

He was convicted in 1983 of forgery and perjury in a case involving a bogus $53,000 check and, in 1986, of being an accessory to a cocaine conspiracy. Released from prison in 1987, Prantil says he will never return to San Diego County: "They rode me out on a rail."

He says that Deputy Dist. Atty. Bob Sullivan had a vendetta against him. Sullivan says that's bunk and notes that two juries convicted Prantil on a number of counts.

From his self-imposed exile, Prantil tries not to dwell on how far he has fallen. "I used to believe in ultimate justice," he said. "I don't anymore."

A Winning T-Shirt

 

T-shirts protesting the judge's decision will go on sale today in 14 San Diego County outlets of Pacific Eyes and T's, the Sorrento Valley-based T-shirt and sunglasses chain.

The new shirts show a Conner-like catamaran with a large screw through it, and a kiwi bird laughing at the sight. Price: $10.

Pacific Eyes and T's has long backed Conner against pirate-banker Michael Fay. During the September races it sold shirts saying "No Way Fay", and "Throw Another Kiwi on the Barbie."

A Well-Done Roast

In Pete Wilson's latter years as mayor of San Diego, it was said he had two goals: to learn to sing and to become governor.

He took lessons and can manfully handle a tune. The second goal eluded him, and he settled for the U. S. Senate. Now, he's trying to rectify that with his third try at the governorship, with his likely Democratic foe being Atty. Gen. John Van de Kamp.

Thursday night the Republican Wilson was among those roasting Assembly Speaker Willie Brown (D-San Francisco) at a benefit dinner in Oakland.

He joked that he wasn't surprised to find picketers carrying signs urging him to stay in the Senate. What did surprise him, he said, was that one of the signs was carried by Van de Kamp.

==========================================================================================

 
http://ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/843/843.F2d.314.86-6669.html
 
http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/search?q=Frank+George+Prantil&circuit=
 
PUBLIC RECORDS http://public.resource.org/

843 F.2d 314

Frank George PRANTIL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 86-6669.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 23, 1987*.
Memorandum Jan. 4, 1988.
Order and Opinion March 31, 1988.

Frank G. Prantil, Fair Oaks, Cal., pro se.

M. Howard Wayne, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Diego, Cal., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.

Before CHOY, FARRIS and HALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Frank George Prantil, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court's summary dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254.

I.

2

Prantil, formerly an attorney in California, was introduced to Daryl Bell by his client Melvin Goins. Prantil agreed to represent Bell on a criminal charge. A few weeks later a woman purporting to be Bell's mother asked Prantil to help her negotiate an escrow check from which Prantil would receive his fee. Prantil accompanied the woman to his bank where he informed the teller that the woman was his client's mother and that he wanted to deposit the check into his trust account. The woman signed the check, which was made payable to Joanna F. McKnight, and Prantil endorsed it to his trust account. Neither Prantil nor the woman indicated that the check might not be genuine.

3

Subsequently, the owner of an escrow agency discovered that three checks were missing from her office. One of the checks had been made out to Joanna F. McKnight and deposited in Prantil's account. The agent's signature had been forged on the check.

4

Prantil was charged with forgery in violation of Section 470 of the California Penal Code. At trial, Prantil argued he knew nothing of the forgery, and that he had deposited the check merely for collection purposes to see whether it was genuine.To establish that Prantil knew the escrow check was forged, the prosecution introduced evidence concerning four trust deeds which Prantil had prepared. Prantil had received information suggesting that the four deeds were forged and that Goins and Bell, were responsible for the forgeries.

5

Prantil was convicted of forgery and sentenced to two years in prison. The California Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. People v. Prantil, 169 Cal.App.3d 592, 215 Cal.Rptr. 372 (1985). The California Supreme Court denied review and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. Prantil v. California, 475 U.S. 1067, 106 S.Ct. 1381, 89 L.Ed.2d 606 (1986).1

6

Prantil filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court. The district court summarily denied the petition. This court granted Prantil's application for a certificate of probable cause.2

II.

7

Prantil contends that numerous trial court errors and a district court delay in deciding his habeas petition denied him due process.

8

This court reviews de novo a district court's denial of a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987). This court presumes the state court's findings of fact to be correct. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254(d).

III.

9

Prantil contends he was denied due process because the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to establish that he passed the forged escrow check "as true and genuine."3

10

This court determines whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).

11

The evidence established that Prantil received information prior to the transaction which suggested that Goins and Bell were involved in a forgery scheme. He also knew that one of the possible victims of the scheme was Joanna McKnight, who was described to him as an elderly woman between the ages of 78 and 80. Yet, despite this knowledge, when Prantil deposited the escrow check into his trust account he did not inform the teller that the check might be a forgery or that the woman with him, who appeared to be approximately 40 to 45 years of age, might not be the person whose name appeared on the check. He merely endorsed the check and asked that it be deposited into his account.

12

Prantil's knowledge of the previous forgeries and the contradictory descriptions of McKnight could have led the jury to reasonably conclude that by failing to alert the bank, Prantil was attempting to pass the check "as true and genuine." See People v. Williams, 186 Cal.App.2d 420, 424, 8 Cal.Rptr. 871, 873 (1960) (tender of check purporting to be signed by specific person established "true and genuine" requirement). Thus, the district court did not err in the determining there was sufficient evidence for a rational trier of fact to find that the "true and genuine" requirement was established beyond a reasonable doubt.

IV.

13

Prantil contends that the trial court deprived him of due process by giving two erroneous jury instructions.

14

This court evaluates jury instructions "in the context of the overall charge to the jury as a component of the entire trial process." Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1239 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 838, 105 S.Ct. 137, 83 L.Ed.2d 77 (1984). To warrant habeas relief, the instruction cannot be merely "undesirable, erroneous, or even 'universally condemned,' " but must violate some due process right guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment. Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. 141, 146, 94 S.Ct. 396, 400, 38 L.Ed.2d 368 (1973). Moreover, the petitioner in a habeas proceeding has the burden of demonstrating that an erroneous instruction "so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process." Darnell v. Swinney, 823 F.2d 299, 301 (9th Cir.1987), petition for cert. filed, (Oct. 1, 1987).

15

Prantil challenges the trial court's instruction regarding the elements of forgery. He contends that by omitting the "true and genuine" requirement, the trial court denied him his due process right to have the jury consider each element of the charged offense. See Connecticut v. Johnson, 460 U.S. 73, 87-88, 103 S.Ct. 969, 978, 74 L.Ed.2d 823 (1983) (instruction on presumption of intent reversible error because permitted jury to convict defendant without examining evidence concerning essential element of crime).

16

The trial court gave the following instructions on the elements of forgery:

17

Now, in order to prove the commission of such crime [forgery], each of the following elements must be proved, each of them. Here we go.

18

Number one, that a person passed or offered to pass a forged instrument. That is the first one.

19

Two that such person knew that the instrument was forged; and three, that such person passed or offered to pass such instrument with the specific intent to defraud another person or persons.

20

Although the instruction omitted the "true and genuine" requirement, we consider the instruction in conjunction with the other instructions. See Bashor, 730 F.2d at 1239. Prior to giving the challenged instruction the court told the jury:

21

Now, every person with the specific intent to defraud--now, remember that I told you 'specific intent.' That's it. That's specific intent--with the specific intent to defraud another, utters, publishes, passes or attempts to pass or make use--there's a lot of things here--or make use of, as true and genuine, any false, altered, forged or counterfeited instrument or document, knowing the same to be false, altered, forged or counterfeited, is guilty of the crime of forgery. (emphasis added)

22

Because the overall charge to the jury informed them of the true and genuine requirement, Prantil was not denied his due process right to have the jury consider every element of the crime.

23

Prantil also contends he was denied due process because the trial court gave an inapplicable and erroneous jury instruction on aiding and abetting. Prantil argues that the accomplice instruction removed an issue of intent from the jury's consideration and thus constituted reversible error under the reasoning of Johnson and Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S.Ct. 2450, 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979).

24

However, the prosecutor specifically denied that Prantil could be guilty as an aider and abettor instead of as a principal. An erroneous jury instruction does not merit habeas relief if the deficiencies pertain to matters that are not in dispute and the error did not so affect the entire trial as to deprive the defendant of due process.See Darnell, 823 F.2d at 302-03. The trial court gave proper instructions regarding the intent necessary to convict Prantil as a principal to the forgery. Because the prosecution did not present an accomplice theory, any deficiencies went to a matter that was not in dispute. The error did not mislead the jury on a disputed issue and thus did not so infect the trial as to deprive Prantil of due process. Id.

V.

25

Prantil contends that the trial court denied him due process by refusing to grant judicial use immunity to a potentially exonerating witness.

26

On his motion for a new trial, Prantil claimed that Goins could testify that Goins and Bell had set up Prantil, that Prantil was unaware that the check was stolen, and that Bell had lied to Prantil when he said there were criminal charges pending against him. Goins had been unavailable to testify at the trial because he was in prison on an unrelated charge. At the new trial hearing Goins invoked the privilege against self-incrimination and refused to testify at the trial unless he received judicial use immunity because he was in prison on an unrelated charge. The court denied Prantil's motion to grant immunity to Goins.

27

Under California law, a court may only grant immunity on the prosecutor's request. Cal. Penal Code Sec. 1324. See In re Weber, 11 Cal.3d 703, 720, 523 P.2d 229, 240, 114 Cal.Rptr. 429, 440 (1974). However, the prosecution's failure to request immunity violated Prantil's due process rights if it deprived him of his right to a fair trial. See United States v. Garner, 663 F.2d 834, 839 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 905, 102 S.Ct. 1750, 72 L.Ed.2d 161 (1982).

28

Here, Prantil's unsupported assertion is the only indication that Goins would have presented exculpatory testimony had he been granted immunity. The record contains overwhelming evidence that Prantil was not an unwitting accomplice in the crime, much of which would not be controverted by Goins' testimony even if that testimony is as Prantil contends it would be. For example, Prantil knew that the woman who deposited the check in his account did not match the description of the woman whose name appeared on the check. On these facts, we hold that Prantil was not deprived of a fair trial. If Prantil was denied a fair trial in this case, trial courts would be required to grant immunity simply on the basis of unsupported allegations by criminal defendants that immunity is required by due process.

29

Moreover, Prantil has made no showing that any misconduct on the part of the prosecutor caused Goins to invoke his privilege against self-incrimination. See United States v. Lord, 711 F.2d 887, 890-92 (9th Cir.1983).

VI.

30

Prantil contends he was denied due process because of a twenty-month delay between the date of the alleged crime and the date of the indictment.

31

A pre-indictment delay, unlike a delay in bringing a charged defendant to trial, is "tested by general proscriptions of due process."4 Arnold v. McCarthy, 566 F.2d 1377, 1381 (9th Cir.1978). A pre-indictment delay does not justify habeas relief unless the defendant can show actual prejudice. Id. at 1382. To prove actual prejudice a defendant must give more than "mere assertions that ... witnesses' memories may have faded with the passage of time...." United States v. Horowitz, 756 F.2d 1400, 1405 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 822, 106 S.Ct. 74, 88 L.Ed.2d 60 (1985).

32

Prantil contends that he suffered actual prejudice because the bank teller could no longer remember the details of the escrow check transaction. However, the state court of appeals found that the delay did not affect the teller's memory. In addition, the court noted that Prantil was benefited by the teller's unresponsiveness to certain questions; therefore there was no prejudice.

33

Prantil also claims that a seven-month delay between the time he filed his habeas petition and the time the district court dismissed the action violated his right to due process.5

34

In Carter v. Thomas, 527 F.2d 1332 (5th Cir.1976), the Fifth Circuit held that a district court's procedure for handling habeas petitions which routinely resulted in delays of up to twenty months violated due process. However, in Satterlee v. Kritzman, 626 F.2d 682, 683 (9th Cir.1980), we held that a district court's clerical error which resulted in an eight-month delay between the dismissal of a prisoner's habeas petition and the time his files were forwarded to the court of appeals did not deprive the petitioner of any substantive rights. As in Satterlee, here there is no policy of discrimination and no showing that the delay was purposeful.

VII.

35

We conclude that the district court properly dismissed Prantil's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

36

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)

1

Because Prantil's direct appeal presented the same constitutional claims as his subsequent habeas petition, it is unnecessary for him to have filed for state habeas relief. Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987)

2

Prantil was released from prison on April 20, 1987. However, because a felony conviction may cause a defendant to suffer adverse collateral consequences even after he has served his sentence, a defendant's release from custody prior to the completion of his federal habeas corpus proceedings will not render his petition moot. Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234, 237-38, 88 S.Ct. 1556, 1559, 20 L.Ed.2d 554 (1968). Prantil was in custody when he filed the petition in district court, so this court retains jurisdiction over the proceedings after he is released. Id

3

Under California law, a person is guilty of forgery if he passes or attempts to pass as true and genuine a forged instrument with knowledge of the forgery and with the specific intent to defraud. Cal. Penal Code Sec. 470; People v. Hellman, 189 Cal.App.2d 777, 778-79, 11 Cal.Rptr. 433 (1961). The only element Prantil challenges as lacking sufficient evidence is the true and genuine requirement

4

Once a suspect is indicted, the more stringent requirements of the speedy trial right apply. Arnold v. McCarthy, 566 F.2d 1377, 1382 (9th Cir.1978)

5

Prantil first raised the issue in his brief to this court. Ordinarily, this court will not decide an issue which was not raised at the District Court. Bolker v. C.I.R., 760 F.2d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir.1985). The court may decide an issue for the first time on appeal, however, where review is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice or to preserve the integrity of the judicial process. Id. Because a claim that a district court violated a party's due process rights questions the integrity of the federal judicial system, we review Prantil's claim despite his failure to raise it below


OpinionatedAmerican

Tampa,
Florida,
USA

Verified Criminal Jan Windglows -DO NOT USE www.bloodloveandlustspells.com JAN on the LAM

#31Consumer Comment

Mon, July 26, 2010

Hey - Jan on the LAM SCAM Jan Windglows and your employee Jim Morgan - GET A LIFE already - the Global internet is onto your 15 yr Western Union Ripoff SCAM...do not use www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com PH: 208-714-4348...PO Box #118 Bonners Ferrym Idaho.

Jan on the LAM - SCAM Jan Windglows continues CYBER STALKING and DECEPTION FRAUD - verified Criminals "Jan on the LAM"

Hey SCAM Jan Windglows that NYC woman does NOT have a CRIMINAL record and IS NOT a CRIMINAL.  Like any American  she is making COURT DATES - the charges are "alleged" so again SCAMMERS Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan caught in their STALKING and HARASSING. 

SCAM Jan Windglows - avoid and do not use -ask for your money back...call Florida State Dept of Correction - help POLICE find this FUGITIVE and SCAM called Jan Windglows.

http://twitter.com//JanWindglowSCAM - READ this shared forum on recent RIPOFF of SCAM site www.bllodloveandlustspells.com

OpinionatedAmerican July 26, 2010 - Jan Windglows post WRONG info on NYC Woman - this are only COURT DATES - NO TRIAL DATE - NO CONVICTION DATE - like any American alleged with charges...NYC Woman has NO CRIMINAL RECORD.

 

SCAMMERS - Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows are CREEPY PPL covering up their lifetime of CRIME!!!!


Mary T. Prantil Is A Scam Artist

Astoria,
New York,
United States of America

TRASH MOUTH MARY PRANTIL OF ASTORIA NEW YORK IS EXPOSED AS A CRIMINAL, LEARN THE LAW IDIOT BEFORE YOU MAKE A a*s OUT OF YOURSELF ON THE FOURMS

#31REBUTTAL Individual responds

Sat, July 24, 2010

.

This report is concerning Frank George Prantil, Richard G. Prantil  and  Franks daughter Mary Teresa Prantil. In past reports authored by Miss Prantil, she's stated that " I'm proud to have been the daughter of Frank G. Prantil" and that she again "comes from a "PRESTIGE'S family" based in the San Diego California. Moreover, Miss MOTOR MOUTH has gone on to portend in being someone else when posting against us such a Richard G prantil and thus I naturally looked him up to find that he had a bit of color in his past as well.
 
I can't speak for the character of the rest of the Prantil family as I don't personally know any of them however, I have no reason to believe them to be anything other then reasonable and law abiding people within exception to the previously named above however, I can pass on to the public what I've read from credible sources such as the Supreme Court, Colleges Attorney Generals office, State Attorneys office and several legal sites concerning unlawful activities pertaining to Frank G Prantil, Richard G Prantil and  Mary T. Prantil.
 
 Miss Prantil has stated that ((( "My father got off lots of criminals" ))) then latter went on to say: ((( "My father got off lots of criminals and innocent people to"))), LOL. She stated that she, nor any member of her criminal family ever took anything that didn't belong to them and that they were all honest people,  PLEASE KEEP THESE LAST STATEMENTS IN MIND as you read down through these long reports, or criminal records belonging to the three Subjects above.
 
Well, I'm sure Frank Prantil did successfully defend some innocent people along the way regarding his practice however, and from the looks of it  he also was instrumental in successfully defending the trash of society such as Murders, Child Molesters, Check Forgers, Bank Robbers etc. He was also quit capable in BOTCHING up their cases that resulted in sending them away to the state, or federal penitentiary for years and years. Do you think it's possible that prantil, through his inability to see clearly as a result of severe drug abuse problem ever sent a innocent person to prison ? that is,,,  after he cleaned them out of their last cent.
 
 Upon researching the records and past legal performance of Mr. Prantil, I was also informed that not only was he successful in defending the scum of humanity on several occasions but went on to be completely corrupted by the same criminals that he had once been representing throughout his practice. You know, Miss Prantil has vested much of her negative energy over the last four years now in telling everyone through her SLANDEROUS POST and blog sites to: "DO NOT USE" our services and that were allegedly attempting to
 
 "COVER A LIFETIME OF CRIME" however all this is would be in that she's simply trying to destroy a on-line business for stopping her Scam games with them, wouldn't let her scam them in short. Of course, the ONLY ONES TRYING TO HIDE A LIFETIME OF CRIME would be Mary T. Prantil, Frank G. Prantil and Richard G. Prantil according to the information below concerning each of them. The CURRENT CRIMINAL RECORDS OF Mary T' Prantil can be found at (((Redacted)))
 It was in my research sited below, that I ran across several charges launched against Frank G. Prantil via the Supreme and Superior court system of California, such infractions as Perjury, Drug Poisson, Drug Abuse, Unlawfully removing $700,000 from a Clients safe as she sat in jail awaiting a murder trial, Fraud, FORGERY, PERJURY, Disbarment on two occasions, Theft and a Prison Term just to mention a few things
 
 Mr. Prantil also had interfered with A HIGH PROFILE homicide trial by becoming personally involved with his Client of that same trial by attempting to cover for the accused so he could recover his fees to which added up to be hundreds of thousands of dollars. One example of his unethical and thieving activity can be vied below as he took part in SCAMMING an old person of 70 or 80 out of a great deal of money by depositing a FORGED CHECK into his bank account, Does this guy sound like he was out to help anyone but himself ?, as I've said:
 
 He was out to rip his Clients off period.  You can see the same thing occurring with Richard G Prantil concerning his REPRIMAND FROM THE STATE BAR ASSOCIATION for cashing in on a divorce four years after it was over. Richard carried this out by filling out a false document and then turning it into the court, IS THAT FRAUD, ABUSING YOUR OFFICE, SCAMMING, FORGERY, FILLING OUT FALSE POLICE AND COURT REPORTS ?  Could this be considered UNETHICAL PRACTICE OF LAW just like what his brother Frank was Disbarred and then thrown into prison over ?  Does this sound like what Mary Prantil has done in the past ? 
 
DIRTY ATTORNEYS and Dirty daughter Mary T. Prantil. Mary is currently doing what her father had taught her to do when involved in the court system, LIE AND HOLD EVERYTHING UP at the Tax Payers Expense.  Frank Prantil blatantly lied on several occasions and attempted to hold up the due process of law by filling one frivolous motion of delay right after another, just like Mary is doing in the current charges being lodged against her by the State of New York. Didn't work for him and it won't work for Mary as you can only delay the inevitable for so long before the obvious comes calling and they take you away LOL.  
 
Frank Prantil was known as a GREEDY individual TO WHICH DIDN'T GET ALONG WITH ANYONE whom further would stop at nothing to accomplish his goals be they of a positive or unethical nature, JUST LIKE Mary T. Prantil his daughter. Both of these criminal personalities both love the spotlight, like to steal and con folks, they both like to bog down and play the legal system at everyone's expense, they both like to abuse drugs and bully people. Mary and her father Frank both like to lie and slander, blame shift their own short comings back onto innocent people etc. I guess mary and daddy had more in common then we thought.
 
 Frank was considered out spoken, brazened, and ruthless just like his daughter,  Mary T. Prantil Internet Terrorist Extraordinaire. So in essence, and according to other legal professionals, Frank Prantil was nothing but a GREEDY UNETHICAL BAD Attorney, A CROOK that happened to liked all the ATTENTION he was getting just like Mary.  Another thing I'd like to add here. Did you know that Frank G. Prantil was in and out of rehab centers for his uncontrolled use of illegal narcotics ?, Did you know that he was imprisoned for 14 months for not only botching a homicide trial,
 
but for being an Accomplice to check FORGERY in the commission of that crime, as you can read in the research below, Mr. Prantil wasn't considered to be a professional on any level by of the courts or his peers. You know, Mary has  huge drug problem from what I've understood and seen via looking at her pictures, from what she's told me personally.
 
 She's into filling out false police reports and starving herself so she can fit into little girl clothing.  I wonder why she's trying to be so thin, 90 or 98 pounds in what her police record shows. I wonder if she isn't trying to look really skinny and young so she can get in with people in the age group of 15 or 20 years of age. No man in his right mind would want something a sickly and haggard looking as this 46 or 47 year old scam artist.
 
Mr. Frank Prantil was DISBARRED twice for drugs, unethical legal activity, and leaving his Clients holding the bag simply because they ran out of money in the middle of their defense. Does any of this sound familiar ?, Does it sound like anything Miss Mary T. Prantil has done in the past ?  I would say that Little Mary is the preverbal apple that didn't fall very far from the tree, wouldn't you say ? Well, Frank Prantil won't be bothering, SCAMMING, or ripping off his Clients any more because he's now deceased and Good Riddance I say.
 
 Now, we have little Mary carrying on his legacy with all of her criminal activities such as you can view below after her fathers information or perhaps here at (((Redacted))) . Please view the facts below coming from the Experts and those that had the misfortune of dealing with him first hand. Sounds like a real Gypsy Scum Ball to me. Read the history of this Idiot and be ready to be SHOCKED, and then read about the exploits of his daughter little miss marry low life prantil. Basically Mary Prantil is blaming everyone else for the very same things she's done in the past or is carrying out against others currently.
 
 
 People like this should just be locked away forever and kept from wasting the courts time and resources. Lastly, please see Richard G. Prantil's Suspension at the very bottom of the report for FILLING a false and misleading document with the court, committing an act of moral turpitude, deception and theft. It would seem that Deception, Lieing, Harassment, Drug Abuse, Drug Trafficking, Filling out false Police and Court reports,
 
 Blame Shifting, Stalking, Slander, FORGERY and STEALING runs in the Prantil family when reading down through these various reports from several different sites on the Internet. This family is nothing but a Horde of self-serving Criminals who pray upon the weak in my opinion. The one thing these Crooks all have in common is that they like to go around ripping people off while at the same time calling innocent others a SCAM. Moreover PROCLAIMING  THEMSELVES to be the VICTIM of a hostile stalker etc.
 
This group of Individuals go on to proclaim themselves to be the VICTIMS who are getting picked or stalked much as Mary has clamed for three years plus now. Mary T. Prantil has no shame simply because she is nothing but a two bit CRIMINAL like her father Frank G. Prantil and his brother as the records reflect. Mary Prantil BASHES the legal system, Attorneys, Ed Magedson, Scam Forum sites, us and everyone else that doesn't go along with or by into her slanderous statements.
 
Many of us out have had to put up with this b***h Mary Prantil for years now on and off however, I think there's enough information on three members of this family now to inform everyone as to who these scum buckets really are. Mary Prantil states: " My father isn't like all these other crooked Attorneys because he spent his life helping people" however the information below not only proves her to be lieing on this count but also proves her in being a Hypocrite as well.
 
Frank Prantil IS, one of those BAD ATTORNEYS that this beaten down, old and  haggard woman blast on her web blog sites, LOL. Always talking about how her father helped people all his life etc, YEAH, he help them all right ?,, RIGHT OUT OF THEIR LIFE SAVINGS. This man sounds like he was your friend until you ran out of money, know the type ? I'm sure you do. Well Mary Pran-Stupid, How does it feel to be FULLY EXPOSED along with your entire CRIMINAL SCAMMER family ?
 
YOU SHOULD NEVER HAVE NEVER FU_C_ED WITH us Scammer. You did though, you just couldn't help yourself, could yeah ? and now everyone knows who and what your TRASHY FAMILY is all about, You hate it don't you ?  The light is pretty bright on you about now, isn't it ?
 
You don't like it because you don't have the option of sneaking around anymore while stalking your next unsuspecting victim from the shadows, TO BAD. Like I said Bit_h, WE WON'T BACK DOWN FROM CRIMINALS like you and we will flatly pound you into the ground.
 
 Heaven will REDUCE YOU to blood and screams before it's all over through that little curse, you remember that curse, RIGHT ? Sure you do because you feel it every day. Ok, STUPID, IF YOU WOULD LIKE US TO DIG UP MORE EVIDENCE ON YOU JUST KEEP posting your trash on us. Hey, I wonder what we can find on your Mother ? perhaps she has a story to tell the world. I WILL KEEP GOING AND GOING to my last breath to EXPOSE a TRASH BAG like yourself. EVERYONE KNOWS ABOUT THE LIFE OF CRIME YOUR TRYING TO HIDE Mary.
YOU DIDN'T GET TO SCAM US SO GET OVER IT, SO BEAT IT ON DOWN THE ROAD if you know what's good for you.
 
====================================================================
 
Los Angeles Times
 
The High Court Closes Book on Colorful Legal Career SAN DIEGO At Large http://articles.latimes.com/1989-03-31/local/me-603_1_high-court March 31, 1989|ANTHONY PERRY The California Supreme Court has quietly ended one of San Diego County's more clamorous legal careers.
 
The court this month upheld the disbarment of Frank George Prantil, a well-known attorney and aspiring politician before being convicted of perjury and forgery charges and spending 14 months in prison. "At one time, he was considered one of the county's top defense attorneys," said attorney Eugene Iredale, who once represented Prantil. "Somehow his life just fell apart on him."
 
 Now living outside Sacramento, the 51-year-old Prantil said he was "devastated" by the court's rejection of his plea that he was unfairly convicted. And he repeated his oft-made accusation that he was victimized because of his maverick ways.
 
 "I'm a victim of the war on drugs," Prantil said. "The prosecutors and the courts can't stand it when someone insists that all defendants have rights." In nearly two decades as a practicing attorney, the San Diego native was never far from the headlines.
 
 He won several high-publicity felony cases and big-money damage suits. He defended a San Diego councilman indicted in the Yellow Cab scandal. Reporters loved his flamboyant rhetoric (he favored Shakespeare and the classics) and brash attire (he wore an American flag tie to court). His practice boomed.
 
He moved from East County to a comfortable spread in La Jolla. But there were also political defeats, angry public disputes, money problems and his final slide into Vacaville state prison.
 
 He concedes now that alcohol and marijuana played a role in his difficulties. He lost races for Congress (1968), district attorney (1970) and El Cajon Municipal Court (1978). The County Bar Assn. branded him as unqualified. The State Bar in 1979 suspended him for six months for misusing a client's money.
 
 He was convicted in 1983 of forgery and perjury in a case involving a bogus $53,000 check and, in 1986, of being an accessory to a cocaine conspiracy. Released from prison in 1987, Prantil says he will never return to San Diego County:
 
"They rode me out on a rail." He says that Deputy Dist. Atty. Bob Sullivan had a vendetta against him. Sullivan says that's bunk and notes that two juries convicted Prantil on a number of counts. From his self-imposed exile, Prantil tries not to dwell on how far he has fallen. "I used to believe in ultimate justice," he said.
 
 "I don't anymore." A Winning T-Shirt T-shirts protesting the judge's decision will go on sale today in 14 San Diego County outlets of Pacific Eyes and T's, the Sorrento Valley-based T-shirt and sunglasses chain. The new shirts show a Conner-like catamaran with a large screw through it, and a kiwi bird laughing at the sight. Price: $10. Pacific Eyes and T's has long backed Conner against pirate-banker Michael Fay.
 
 During the September races it sold shirts saying "No Way Fay", and "Throw Another Kiwi on the Barbie." A Well-Done Roast In Pete Wilson's latter years as mayor of San Diego, it was said he had two goals: to learn to sing and to become governor.
 
He took lessons and can manfully handle a tune. The second goal eluded him, and he settled for the U. S. Senate. Now, he's trying to rectify that with his third try at the governorship, with his likely Democratic foe being Atty. Gen. John Van de Kamp.
 
Thursday night the Republican Wilson was among those roasting Assembly Speaker Willie Brown (D-San Francisco) at a benefit dinner in Oakland. He joked that he wasn't surprised to find picketers carrying signs urging him to stay in the Senate. What did surprise him, he said, was that one of the signs was carried by Van de Kamp.
 
==========================================================================================

Justia US Court Of Appeals Cases & Opinions

Frank George PRANTIL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent-Appellee.

http://ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/843/843.F2d.314.86-6669.html http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/search?q=Frank+George+Prantil&circuit= PUBLIC RECORDS http://public.resource.org/ 843 F.2d 314 Frank George PRANTIL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent-Appellee. No. 86-6669. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 23, 1987*. Memorandum Jan. 4, 1988. Order and Opinion March 31, 1988. Frank G. Prantil, Fair Oaks, Cal., pro se. M. Howard Wayne, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Diego, Cal., for

 
respondent-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Before CHOY, FARRIS and HALL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Frank George Prantil, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court's summary dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. I. 2
 
 Prantil, formerly an attorney in California, was introduced to Daryl Bell by his client Melvin Goins. Prantil agreed to represent Bell on a criminal charge. A few weeks later a woman purporting to be Bell's mother asked Prantil to help her negotiate an escrow
 
check from which Prantil would receive his fee. Prantil accompanied the woman to his bank where he informed the teller that the woman was his client's mother and that he wanted to deposit the check into his trust account. The woman signed the check, which was made payable to Joanna F. McKnight,
 
 and Prantil endorsed it to his trust account. Neither Prantil nor the woman indicated that the check might not be genuine. 3 Subsequently, the owner of an escrow agency discovered that three
 
checks were missing from her office. One of the checks had been made out to Joanna F. McKnight and deposited in Prantil's account. The agent's signature had been forged on the check. 4 Prantil was charged with forgery in violation of Section 470 of the California Penal Code. At trial, Prantil argued he knew nothing of the forgery, and that he had deposited the check merely for collection purposes to see whether it was
 
genuine. To establish that Prantil knew the escrow check was forged, the prosecution introduced evidence concerning four trust deeds which Prantil had prepared. Prantil had received information suggesting that the four deeds were forged and that Goins and Bell, were responsible for the forgeries. 5 Prantil was convicted of forgery and sentenced to two years in prison. The California Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction.
 
People v. Prantil, 169 Cal.App.3d 592, 215 Cal.Rptr. 372 (1985). The California Supreme Court denied review and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. Prantil v. California, 475 U.S. 1067, 106 S.Ct. 1381, 89 L.Ed.2d 606
 
(1986).1 6 Prantil filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court. The district court summarily denied the petition. This court granted Prantil's application for a certificate of probable cause.2 II. 7 Prantil contends that numerous trial court errors and a district court delay in deciding his habeas petition denied him due process. 8 This court reviews de novo a district court's denial of a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987). This court presumes the state court's findings of fact to be correct. 28
 
U.S.C. Sec. 2254(d). III. 9 Prantil contends he was denied due process because the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to establish that he passed the forged escrow check "as true and genuine."3 10 This court determines whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v.
 
Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). 11 The evidence established that Prantil received information prior to the transaction which suggested that Goins and Bell were involved in a forgery scheme. He also knew that one of the possible victims of the scheme was Joanna McKnight, who was described to him as an elderly woman between the ages of 78 and 80. Yet, despite this
 
knowledge, when Prantil deposited the escrow check into his trust account he did not inform the teller that the check might be a forgery or that the woman with him, who appeared to be approximately 40 to 45 years of age, might not be the person whose name appeared on the check. He merely endorsed the check and asked that it be
 
deposited into his account. 12 Prantil's knowledge of the previous forgeries and the contradictory descriptions of McKnight could have led the jury to reasonably conclude that by failing to alert the bank, Prantil was attempting to pass the check "as true and genuine." See People v. Williams, 186 Cal.App.2d 420, 424, 8 Cal.Rptr. 871, 873 (1960) (tender of check purporting to be signed by specific person established "true and genuine" requirement). Thus, the district court did not err in the determining
 
there was sufficient evidence for a rational trier of fact to find that the "true and genuine" requirement was established beyond a reasonable doubt. IV. 13 Prantil contends that the trial court deprived him of due process by giving two erroneous jury instructions.
 
14 This court evaluates jury instructions "in the context of the overall charge to the jury as a component of the entire trial process." Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1239 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 838, 105 S.Ct. 137, 83 L.Ed.2d 77 (1984). To warrant habeas relief, the instruction cannot be merely "undesirable, erroneous, or even 'universally condemned,' " but must violate some due process right guaranteed
 
by the fourteenth amendment. Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. 141, 146, 94 S.Ct. 396, 400, 38 L.Ed.2d 368 (1973). Moreover, the petitioner in a habeas proceeding has the burden of demonstrating that an erroneous instruction "so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process." Darnell v. Swinney, 823 F.2d 299, 301 (9th Cir.1987), petition for cert. filed, (Oct. 1, 1987). 15 Prantil challenges the
 
trial court's instruction regarding the elements of forgery. He contends that by omitting the "true and genuine" requirement, the trial court denied him his due process right to have the jury consider each element of the charged offense. See Connecticut v. Johnson, 460 U.S. 73, 87-88, 103 S.Ct. 969, 978, 74 L.Ed.2d 823 (1983) (instruction on presumption of intent reversible error because permitted jury to
 
convict defendant without examining evidence concerning essential element of crime). 16 The trial court gave the following instructions on the elements of forgery: 17 Now, in order to prove the commission of such crime [forgery], each of the following elements must be proved, each of them. Here we go. 18 Number one, that a person passed or offered to pass a forged instrument. That is the first one. 19 Two that such
 
 person knew that the instrument was forged; and three, that such person passed or offered to pass such instrument with the specific intent to defraud another person or persons. 20 Although the instruction omitted the "true and genuine" requirement, we
 
 consider the instruction in conjunction with the other instructions. See Bashor, 730 F.2d at 1239. Prior to giving the challenged instruction the court told the jury: 21 Now, every person with the specific intent to defraud--now, remember that I told you 'specific intent.' That's it. That's specific intent--with the specific intent to defraud another, utters, publishes, passes or attempts to pass or make use--there's a lot of things here--or make use of, as true and genuine, any false, altered, forged or
 
counterfeited instrument or document, knowing the same to be false, altered, forged or counterfeited, is guilty of the crime of forgery. (emphasis added) 22 Because the overall charge to the jury informed them of the true and genuine requirement, Prantil was not denied his due process right to have the jury consider every element of the crime. 23 Prantil also contends he was denied due process because the trial court
 
 gave an inapplicable and erroneous jury instruction on aiding and abetting. Prantil argues that the accomplice instruction removed an issue of intent from the jury's consideration and thus constituted reversible error under the reasoning of Johnson and Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S.Ct. 2450, 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979). 24 However, the prosecutor specifically denied that Prantil could be guilty as an aider
 
 and abettor instead of as a principal. An erroneous jury instruction does not merit habeas relief if the deficiencies pertain to matters that are not in dispute and the error did not so affect the entire trial as to deprive the defendant of due process. See Darnell, 823 F.2d at 302-03. The trial court gave proper instructions regarding the
 
 intent necessary to convict Prantil as a principal to the forgery. Because the prosecution did not present an accomplice theory, any deficiencies went to a matter that was not in dispute. The error did not mislead the jury on a disputed issue and thus did not so infect the trial as to deprive Prantil of due process. Id. V. 25 Prantil contends that the trial court denied him due process by refusing to grant judicial use
 
 immunity to a potentially exonerating witness. 26 On his motion for a new trial, Prantil claimed that Goins could testify that Goins and Bell had set up Prantil, that Prantil was unaware that the check was stolen, and that Bell had lied to Prantil when he said there were criminal charges pending against him. Goins had been unavailable to testify
 
at the trial because he was in prison on an unrelated charge. At the new trial hearing Goins invoked the privilege against self-incrimination and refused to testify at the trial unless he received judicial use immunity because he was in prison on an unrelated charge. The court denied Prantil's motion to grant immunity to Goins. 27 Under
 
 California law, a court may only grant immunity on the prosecutor's request. Cal. Penal Code Sec. 1324. See In re Weber, 11 Cal.3d 703, 720, 523 P.2d 229, 240, 114 Cal.Rptr. 429, 440 (1974). However, the prosecution's failure to request immunity violated Prantil's due process rights if it deprived him of his right to a fair trial. See United States v. Garner, 663 F.2d 834, 839 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S.
 
905, 102 S.Ct. 1750, 72 L.Ed.2d 161 (1982). 28 Here, Prantil's unsupported assertion is the only indication that Goins would have presented exculpatory testimony had he been granted immunity. The record contains overwhelming evidence that Prantil was not an unwitting accomplice in the crime, much of which would not be controverted
 
by Goins' testimony even if that testimony is as Prantil contends it would be. For example, Prantil knew that the woman who deposited the check in his account did not match the description of the woman whose name appeared on the check. On these facts, we hold that Prantil was not deprived of a fair trial. If Prantil was denied a fair trial in this case, trial courts would be required to grant immunity simply on the basis
 
of unsupported allegations by criminal defendants that immunity is required by due process. 29 Moreover, Prantil has made no showing that any misconduct on the part of the prosecutor caused Goins to invoke his privilege against self-incrimination.
 
See United States v. Lord, 711 F.2d 887, 890-92 (9th Cir.1983). VI. 30 Prantil contends he was denied due process because of a twenty-month delay between the date of the alleged crime and the date of the indictment. 31 A pre-indictment delay, unlike a delay in bringing a charged defendant to trial, is "tested by general proscriptions of due process."4 Arnold v. McCarthy, 566 F.2d 1377, 1381 (9th
 
Cir.1978). A pre-indictment delay does not justify habeas relief unless the defendant can show actual prejudice. Id. at 1382. To prove actual prejudice a defendant must give more than "mere assertions that ... witnesses' memories may have faded with the passage of time...." United States v. Horowitz, 756 F.2d 1400, 1405 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 822, 106 S.Ct. 74, 88 L.Ed.2d 60 (1985). 32 Prantil contends
 
 that he suffered actual prejudice because the bank teller could no longer remember the details of the escrow check transaction. However, the state court of appeals found that the delay did not affect the teller's memory. In addition, the court noted that Prantil was benefited by the teller's unresponsiveness to certain questions;
 
therefore there was no prejudice. 33 Prantil also claims that a seven-month delay between the time he filed his habeas petition and the time the district court dismissed the action violated his right to due process.5 34 In Carter v. Thomas, 527 F.2d 1332 (5th Cir.1976), the Fifth Circuit held that a district court's procedure for handling habeas petitions which routinely resulted in delays of up to twenty months violated due process. However, in Satterlee v. Kritzman, 626 F.2d 682, 683 (9th Cir.1980),
 
we held that a district court's clerical error which resulted in an eight-month delay between the dismissal of a prisoner's habeas petition and the time his files were forwarded to the court of appeals did not deprive the petitioner of any substantive rights. As in Satterlee, here there is no policy of discrimination and no showing that the delay was purposeful. VII. 35 We conclude that the district court properly
 
dismissed Prantil's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 36 AFFIRMED. * The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) 1 Because Prantil's direct appeal presented the same constitutional claims as his subsequent habeas petition, it is unnecessary for him to have filed for state habeas relief. Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528
 
(9th Cir.1987) 2 Prantil was released from prison on April 20, 1987. However, because a felony conviction may cause a defendant to suffer adverse collateral consequences even after he has served his sentence, a defendant's release from custody prior to the completion of his federal habeas corpus proceedings will not render his petition moot. Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234, 237-38, 88 S.Ct. 1556, 1559, 20 L.Ed.2d 554
 
 (1968). Prantil was in custody when he filed the petition in district court, so this court retains jurisdiction over the proceedings after he is released. Id 3 Under California law, a person is guilty of forgery if he passes or attempts to pass as true and genuine a forged instrument with knowledge of the forgery and with the specific intent to defraud. Cal. Penal Code Sec. 470; People v. Hellman, 189 Cal.App.2d 777,
 
 778-79, 11 Cal.Rptr. 433 (1961). The only element Prantil challenges as lacking sufficient evidence is the true and genuine requirement 4 Once a suspect is indicted, the more stringent requirements of the speedy trial right apply. Arnold v. McCarthy, 566 F.2d 1377, 1382 (9th Cir.1978) 5 Prantil first raised the issue in his brief to this court. Ordinarily, this court will not decide an issue which was not raised at the
 
District Court. Bolker v. C.I.R., 760 F.2d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir.1985). The court may decide an issue for the first time on appeal, however, where review is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice or to preserve the integrity of the judicial process. Id. Because a claim that a district court violated a party's due process rights questions the integrity of the federal judicial system, we review Prantil's claim despite his failure to raise it below CC | Transformed by Public.Resource.Org
 
=========================================================================
 
Justia US Court Of Appeals Cases & Opinions
 
MAIN SITE http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/search?q=+Prantil+&circuit=http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/756/759/162188/
 
A review of the prosecutor's remarks during the closing argument reveals that his statements,
although derogatory and gratuitous by themselves, served to compound the prejudice to the defendant that flowed from Mr. Gorder's ambiguous role as both prosecutor and participant witness. The prosecutor's closing arguments illustrate the degree of actual prejudice that results when an advocate, through his direct participation in the
 
events under litigation, can argue to the jury based on actual or perceived personal knowledge.5 The prosecutor launched a personalized attack on the defendant's motives. A recurrent theme of the prosecutor's summation was to portray the defendant as "greedy,"6 "corrupt," "dishonest," and "sleazy." The prosecutor
 
cautioned the jury that the defendant did not meet the minimum standards of attorney behavior demanded by the "advocacy system of justice." As such, the prosecutor explained to the jury that "Mr. Prantil is the kind of person who gives lawyers a bad name to the general public and it's your duty as jurors to call him to
 
account." The prosecutor charged the jury with the responsibility of ridding the ranks of the criminal defense bar of such a "crook" even though "it's true, thank God it's true, that criminal defense attorneys are not crooks as a general rule." These comments came from an individual who was not only an experienced prosecutor but also, as the jury could not fail to appreciate, both a participant in many of the
 
underlying events and Mr. Prantil's adversary throughout. As previously mentioned, Mr. Gorder had conducted the grand jury examination of the defendant that resulted in three of the defendant's perjury convictions. In his summation of the evidence on these counts, the prosecutor drew the jury's attention to the complete grand jury
 
transcripts. Mr. Gorder informed the jury that these transcripts demonstrated that the defendant committed perjury "not just in the specific counts he's charged with, but in a number of other areas also." Once again, this is an assertion of personal knowledge of a testimonial rather than an argumentative character.
 
=================================
 
Initially, we decline to accept the government's contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that the defendant committed perjury by denying knowing who was with Powell in the Omaha area. No question concerning the identity of the person with Mr. Powell in the Omaha area was asked or answered in the grand jury proceedings.
 
Further, the prosecutor's depiction of Mr. Prantil's actual remarks as an attempt to conceal the activities of his sister-in-law from the grand jury is somewhat puzzling in light of the fact that Mr. Gorder had, pursuant to Ms. Schmidt's prior agreement to cooperate with the government, full knowledge of her activities in and around the Omaha area. The only grand jury testimony elicited from the defendant focused on
 
who picked up the defendant at the airport and who drove him back. The defendant said that a woman, whose name he couldn't recall, did so. In our view, this assertion could not have influenced the grand jury's investigation.
 
The defendant's inaccurate testimony about a nonexistent woman at the airport could not have launched any further successful grand jury investigation. 30 The government's entire perjury theory on this count of the indictment depends in equal measure on the false premise that there was a woman at the airport and that this woman was the defendant's sister-in-law, whose identity the defendant wishes to
 
conceal. The defendant, however, could not possibly be testifying falsely so as to shield a nonexistent woman. Similarly, the defendant's inability to recall the name of this nonexistent woman, a testimonial assertion that is hard to peg as a literal falsehood, could not have influenced the grand jury's deliberations. Simply put, if
 
there was no blonde woman at the Omaha airport, the defendant's inability to recall her name is immaterial. Accordingly, because the defendant's testimony was not material, we hold that the defendant's conviction on Count Six is reversed.
 
31 CONCLUSION 32 To conclude, we reverse defendant's perjury conviction on Count Six of the indictment because the allegedly perjurious statements lack materiality. We reverse and remand the defendant's remaining convictions on the ground that the
 
district court abused its discretion in refusing to recuse the participating prosecutor as a material witness and on the ground of prosecutorial misconduct in the government's closing argument.
 
===========================================
 
5 In winding up his closing argument, Mr. Gorder clarified his role in the case as follows: Ladies and Gentlemen, our system of justice is an advocacy system of justice and there are adversaries. In this particular case the United States is an adversary, Frank Prantil is an adversor.
 
I represent the United States and Mr. Iredale represents the defendant. That system depends upon a certain minimum standard of behavior, a system where the attorneys are honest with each other and with the court. Frank Prantil is not that kind of person. He was dishonest from day one until he walked off the stand on October 6th having said that everything was above the board. And it's your duty to call him to account for those actions, and I ask you to return
 
verdicts of guilty on each count of the indictment. R.T. 116. 6 In his closing argument, Mr. Gorder refers to the defendant's explanation, contained in a tape recording, that the monies he collected represented his attorney's fees in part. In response to the defendant's taped statement that "I have a right to earn my living too," the prosecutor explains to the jury, "He talks about he's just picking up his fees, again establishing his greed." R.T. 115 (emphasis added)
 
==========================================
 
Justia US Court Of Appeals Cases & Opinions

Frank George PRANTIL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent-Appellee.

Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., argued, Peter K. Nunez, U.S. Atty., Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Eugene G. Iredale, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of California. Before FERGUSON and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON,* District Judge. FERGUSON,

 
 Circuit Judge: http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/764/548/149993/ A review of the prosecutor's remarks during the closing argument reveals that his statements, although derogatory and gratuitous by themselves, served to compound the prejudice to the defendant that flowed from Mr. Gorder's ambiguous role as both
 
 prosecutor and participant witness. The prosecutor's closing arguments illustrate the degree of actual prejudice that results when an advocate, through his direct participation in the events under litigation, can argue to the jury based on actual or perceived personal knowledge.5 The prosecutor launched a personalized attack on the
 
 defendant's motives. A recurrent theme of the prosecutor's summation was to portray the defendant as "greedy,"6 "corrupt," "dishonest," and "sleazy." The prosecutor cautioned the jury that the defendant did not meet the minimum standards of attorney behavior demanded by the "advocacy system of justice." As such, the prosecutor explained to the jury that "Mr. Prantil is the kind of person who gives
 
lawyers a bad name to the general public and it's your duty as jurors to call him to account." The prosecutor charged the jury with the responsibility of ridding the ranks of the criminal defense bar of such a "crook" even though "it's true, thank God it's true, that criminal defense attorneys are not crooks as a general rule." 25 These
 
comments came from an individual who was not only an experienced prosecutor but also, as the jury could not fail to appreciate, both a participant in many of the underlying events and Mr. Prantil's adversary throughout.
 
 As previously mentioned, Mr. Gorder had conducted the grand jury examination of the defendant that resulted in three of the defendant's perjury convictions. In his summation of the evidence on these counts, the prosecutor drew the jury's attention to the complete grand jury transcripts.
 
Mr. Gorder informed the jury that these transcripts demonstrated that the defendant committed perjury "not just in the specific counts he's charged with, but in a number of other areas also." Once again, this is an assertion of personal knowledge of a testimonial rather than an argumentative character.
 
=========================================

Frank George PRANTIL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent-Appellee.

(1984). Hence, we must decide whether the defendant's testimony was material. 29 Initially, we decline to accept the government's contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that the defendant committed perjury by denying knowing who was with Powell in the Omaha area. No question concerning the identity of the person with Mr. Powell in the Omaha area was asked or answered in the grand jury proceedings.

 
Further, the prosecutor's depiction of Mr. Prantil's actual remarks as an attempt to conceal the activities of his sister-in-law from the grand jury is somewhat puzzling in light of the fact that Mr. Gorder had, pursuant to Ms. Schmidt's prior agreement to cooperate with the government, full knowledge of her activities in and around the
 
Omaha area. The only grand jury testimony elicited from the defendant focused on who picked up the defendant at his hotel and who drove him back to the Omaha Airport. The defendant said that a woman, whose name he couldn't recall, did so.
 
In our view, this assertion could not have influenced the grand jury's investigation. The defendant's inaccurate testimony about a nonexistent woman could not have launched any further successful grand jury investigation. 30 The government's entire perjury theory on this count of the indictment depends in equal measure on the false
 
 premise that there was a woman who met him at his hotel and that this woman was the defendant's sister-in-law, whose identity the defendant wishes to conceal.
 
The defendant, however, could not possibly be testifying falsely so as to shield a nonexistent woman. Similarly, the defendant's inability to recall the name of this nonexistent woman, a testimonial assertion that is hard to peg as a literal falsehood,
 
 could not have influenced the grand jury's deliberations. Simply put, if there was no blonde woman who met the defendant at his hotel and drove him to the airport, the defendant's inability to recall her name is immaterial.
 
 Accordingly, because the defendant's testimony was not material, we hold that the defendant's conviction on Count Six is reversed.
 
===========================================
 
Justia US Court Of Appeals Cases & Opinions
 
1 http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/764/548/149993/ See United States v. Powell, 708 F.2d 455 (9th Cir.1983), rev'd in part, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 471, 83 L.Ed.2d 461 (1984). Betty Powell was convicted on four counts of a fifteen-count indictment which had alleged that she conspired with her husband and son to distribute cocaine. She was acquitted on all substantive conspiracy counts.
 
 Three of her four convictions, those alleging the use of a telephone to facilitate drug offenses, were subsequently reversed on appeal, United States v. Powell, 708 F.2d 455 (9th Cir.1983), but then reinstated by the Supreme Court, United States v. Powell, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 471, 83 L.Ed.2d 461 (1984) (9th Cir.), cert. denied,
 
442 U.S. 931, 99 S.Ct. 2864, 61 L.Ed.2d 300 (1979) 5 In winding up his closing argument, Mr. Gorder clarified his role in the case as follows: Ladies and Gentlemen, our system of justice is an advocacy system of justice and there are adversaries. In this particular case the United States is an adversary, Frank Prantil is an adversor. I represent the United States and Mr. Iredale represents the defendant.
 
That system depends upon a certain minimum standard of behavior, a system where the attorneys are honest with each other and with the court. Frank Prantil is not that kind of person. He was dishonest from day one until he walked off the stand on October 6th having said that everything was above the board. And it's your duty to
 
call him to account for those actions, and I ask you to return verdicts of guilty on each count of the indictment. R.T. 116. 6 In his closing argument, Mr. Gorder refers to the defendant's explanation, contained in a tape recording, that the monies he
 
 collected represented his attorney's fees in part. In response to the defendant's taped statement that "I have a right to earn my living too," the prosecutor explains to the jury, "He talks about he's just picking up his fees, again establishing his greed." R.T. 115 (emphasis added)
 


OpinionatedAmerican

Tampa,
Florida,
USA

Jan Windglows aka Mystical Jan CRIMINAL for DECEPTION FRAUD - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

#31Consumer Comment

Sat, July 24, 2010

Verified SCAMMERS proven Western Union Ripoff of 15 yrs Steals over $300,000 form innocent ppl.  Jan Windglows aka Mystical Jan 208 aka Enchatress 208 is CONVICTED CRIMINAL...do not use unless you want to lose your MONEY!!!

OpinionatedAmerican July 24, 2010

Con-Artist and Verified Criminal - SCAM Jan Windglows and her employee and NOT her husband - James Morgan aka Jim Morgan aka DRAGON

(((Redacted)))- READ the most up to date SCAM of this complete CREEP and Verifiied CRIMINAL - Jan Windlows.

(((Redacted)))- READ this shared FORUM that will lisat the most recent Western Union SCAM with names of clients all over America Tampa, SEattle, Pittsburg and more.

SCAM Jan Windglows changes WIGS as much as PO BOX.

FACT:  SCASM Jan Windglows does not provide a PO BOX because she is a verified CRIMINAL.

FACT:  SCAM Jan Windglows is a FLORIDA PLOCE FUGITIVE on the run for violating her probabtion for DECEPTION FRAUD; GRAND :LARCENY and Identity Theft...do not use Jan Windglows of (((Redacted)))

PO BOX #118
Bonners Ferry, Idaho

PO Box #712
Driggs, Idaho

7961 Court
Bushnell, Florida - last know address for SCAM Jan Windglows.

HEY - Jan Windglows since you are reading this - WHAT is your ADDRESS ??

And this NYC woman - you are a complete disgrace tro human kind.  This NYC woman has NOT been convicted, charged or is NOT even on trial - Jan Windglows continues to committ AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT.   The Internet is an extension of the PHONE. It is a form of harasssment what Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan continue to POST and STALK - read the daily false posting bcs the POLICE are reading all of this and are in the hope that SCAM Jan Windglows will finally be found and PUT BACK IN JAIL for a FOOTBALL DIGIT Jail sentence. 

READ the Global Internet for all COMPLIANTS on (((Redacted)))

SCAM Jan Windglows is commiting DECEPTION FRAUD everytime she offers to do a SPELL for MONEY.  This is a CRIME.

DECEPTION FRAUD is a REAL CRIME.  Just ask this SCAMMER for her REAL address...SCAM Jan Windglows has been asked and asked to provide a REAL Address...SCAM Jan Windglows does not provide a REAL Address because SCAM Jan Windglows is a VERIFIED CONVICTED CRIMINAL with a RAP SHEET that spans YEARS!!!

READ most up to date SCAM of (((Redacted)))

THANK YOU ED MAGEDSON FOR ALLOWING THIS FORUM TO FIND THE REAK CRIMINALS - SCAM Jan Windglows and EMPLOYEE Jim Morgan.

OpinionatedAmerican - July 24, 2010 

 

CLICK here to see why Rip-off Report, as a matter of policy, deleted either a phone number, link or e-mail address from this Report.


Mary T. Prantil Is A Scam Artist

Astoria,
New York,
United States of America

This report is concerning Frank George Prantil and his CRIMINAL daughter Mary Teresa Prantil.

#31REBUTTAL Individual responds

Sat, July 24, 2010

This report is concerning Frank George Prantil and his daughter Mary Teresa Prantil.  In past reports authored by Miss Prantil, she has stated that " I'm proud to have been the daughter of Frank G. Prantil" and that she again "comes from a "PRESTIGE'S family" based in the San Diego there in the state of California.
 
 I can't speak for the character of the rest of her family as I don't personally know them however, I have no reason to believe them to be anything other then reasonable and law abiding people however, I can relay what I've read from credible sources such as transcripts from the Supreme Court, Colleges of Frank Prantil, Attorney Generals office, State Attorneys office legal sites etc pertaining to Frank G. Prantil.
 
Miss Prantil has stated that "My father got off lots of criminals" then latter went on to say: "My father got off lots of criminals and innocent people to", LOL. Well, I'm sure he did successfully defend some innocent people along the way but from the looks of it, he also was instrumental in successfully defending the trash of society such as Murders,
 
Child Molesters, Check Forgers, Bank Robbers etc. Upon researching the records and past legal performance of Mr. Prantil, I was also informed that not only was he successful in defending the scum of humanity on several occasions but went on to be completely corrupted by the same criminals that he had been representing throughout his practice.
 
It was in my research sited below,  did I run across several charges launched against Frank G. Prantil via the Supreme and Superior court system there in California, such infractions as Perjury, Drug Poisson, Drug Abuse, Unlawfully removing $700,000 from a Clients safe as she sat in jail awaiting a murder trial and so fourth.
 
 Mr. Prantil also had interfered with the homicide trial by becoming personally involved with his Client of that same murder trial by attempting to cover for the accused so he could recover his fees. Prantil lied blatantly on several occasions and attempted to hold up the due process of law by filling one frivolous motion of delay right after another just like Mary in the current charges being lodged against her by the State of New York.
 
Frank Prantil was known as a greedy individual who would stop at nothing to accomplish his goals be they of a positive or unethical nature, JUST LIKE Mary T. Prantil his daughter, He was considered out spoken, brazened, and ruthless just like his daughter Mary T. Prantil Internet Terrorist Extraordinaire.
 
So in essence and according to other legal professionals, Frank Prantil was nothing but a GREEDY UNETHICAL Attorney that happened to like the spotlight just like Mary. Another thing I'd like to add here. Did you know that Frank G. Prantil was in and out of rehab centers for his uncontrolled use of illegal narcotics ?, Did you know that he was imprisoned for 14 months for not only botching a homicide trial, but for being an Accomplice to check FORGERY in the commission of that crime.
 
As you can read in the research below, Mr. Prantil wasn't considered a professional on any level by the courts or his peers. Mr. Prantil was DISBARRED twice for drug, unethical activity, and leaving his Clients holding the bag simply because they ran out of money in the middle of their defense. Does any of this sound familiar ?, Does it sound like anything Miss Mary T. Prantil has done in the past ?,
 
 I would say that Little Mary is the preverbal apple that didn't fall very far from the tree, wouldn't you say ?  Well, Frank Prantil won't be bothering, SCAMMING, or ripping off his Clients any more because he's now deceased. Good Riddance I say.
 
Now, we have little Mary carrying on his legacy with all of her criminal activities such as you can view below after her fathers information. Please view the facts below coming from the Experts and those that had the misfortune of dealing with him first hand.
 
Sounds like a real Gypsy Scum Ball to me. Read the history of this Idiot and be ready to be SHOCKED, and then read about the exploits of his daughter little miss marry low life prantil. People like this should just be locked away forever and kept from wasting the courts time and resources.
 
Lastly, please see Richard G. Prantil's Suspension at the very bottom of the report for FILLING a false and misleading document with the court, committing an act of moral turpitude, deception and theft.
 
It would seem that Deception, Lieing, Harassment, Drug Abuse, Drug Trafficking, Filling out false Police and Court reports, Blame Shifting, Stalking, Slander and STEALING runs in the Prantil family when reading down these various reports from several different sites on the Internet.
 
This family is nothing but a Horde of self-serving Criminals who pray upon the weak, in my opinion. One thing these Crooks have in common is that they go around ripping people off while at the same time calling innocent others a SCAM.  This group of Individuals go on to proclaim themselves the VICTIM who getting picked or stalked much as Mary has clamed for three years plus.
 
Mary T. Prantil has no shame simply because she is nothing but a two bit CRIMINAL like her father Frank G. Prantil and his brother as the records reflect. Many of us out have had to put up with this b***h Mary Prantil for years now on and off however, I think there's enough information on three members of this family now to inform
 
 
everyone as to who these scum buckets really are. Frank Prantil is ONE OF THOSE BAD ATTORNEYS that beaten down haggard Mary blast on her web blog sites, LOL. Always talking about how her father helped people all his life etc, YEAH, he help them all right,, RIGHT OUT OF THEIR LIFE SAVINGS. He was your friend until you ran out of money, know the type ? I'm sure you do.
 
Well Mary Pran-Stupid, How does it feel to be FULLY EXPOSED along with your entire CRIMINAL SCAMMER family ? YOU SHOULD NEVER HAVE NEVER FU_C_ED WITH us Scammer.
 
You did though, you just couldn't help yourself could yeah ? and now everyone knows who and what your TRASHY FAMILY is all about, You hate it don't you ? You don't like it because you don't have the option of sneaking around any more stalking your next victim from the shadows, TO BAD.
 
Like I said Bit_h, WE WON'T BACK DOWN FROM CRIMINALS like you and we will flatly pound you into the ground. Heaven will REDUCE YOU to blood and screams before it's all over with through that little curse, you remember that curse, RIGHT ? Sure you do because you feel it every day.  
 
Ok, STUPID, IF YOU WOULD LIKE US TO DIGG UP MORE EVIDENCE ON YOU JUST KEEP posting your trash on us. YOU DIDN'T GET TO SCAM US SO GET OVER IT AND BEAT IT ON DOWN THE ROAD if you know what's good for you.
 
 

High Court Closes Book on Colorful Legal Career

SAN DIEGO At Large http://articles.latimes.com/1989-03-31/local/me-603_1_high-court

March 31, 1989|ANTHONY PERRY

The California Supreme Court has quietly ended one of San Diego County's more clamorous legal careers.

The court this month upheld the disbarment of Frank George Prantil, a well-known attorney and aspiring politician before being convicted of perjury and forgery charges and spending 14 months in prison.

"At one time, he was considered one of the county's top defense attorneys," said attorney Eugene Iredale, who once represented Prantil. "Somehow his life just fell apart on him."

Now living outside Sacramento, the 51-year-old Prantil said he was "devastated" by the court's rejection of his plea that he was unfairly convicted. And he repeated his oft-made accusation that he was victimized because of his maverick ways.

"I'm a victim of the war on drugs," Prantil said. "The prosecutors and the courts can't stand it when someone insists that all defendants have rights."

In nearly two decades as a practicing attorney, the San Diego native was never far from the headlines. He won several high-publicity felony cases and big-money damage suits. He defended a San Diego councilman indicted in the Yellow Cab scandal.

Reporters loved his flamboyant rhetoric (he favored Shakespeare and the classics) and brash attire (he wore an American flag tie to court). His practice boomed. He moved from East County to a comfortable spread in La Jolla.

But there were also political defeats, angry public disputes, money problems and his final slide into Vacaville state prison. He concedes now that alcohol and marijuana played a role in his difficulties.

He lost races for Congress (1968), district attorney (1970) and El Cajon Municipal Court (1978). The County Bar Assn. branded him as unqualified. The State Bar in 1979 suspended him for six months for misusing a client's money.

He was convicted in 1983 of forgery and perjury in a case involving a bogus $53,000 check and, in 1986, of being an accessory to a cocaine conspiracy. Released from prison in 1987, Prantil says he will never return to San Diego County: "They rode me out on a rail."

He says that Deputy Dist. Atty. Bob Sullivan had a vendetta against him. Sullivan says that's bunk and notes that two juries convicted Prantil on a number of counts.

From his self-imposed exile, Prantil tries not to dwell on how far he has fallen. "I used to believe in ultimate justice," he said. "I don't anymore."

A Winning T-Shirt

 

T-shirts protesting the judge's decision will go on sale today in 14 San Diego County outlets of Pacific Eyes and T's, the Sorrento Valley-based T-shirt and sunglasses chain.

The new shirts show a Conner-like catamaran with a large screw through it, and a kiwi bird laughing at the sight. Price: $10.

Pacific Eyes and T's has long backed Conner against pirate-banker Michael Fay. During the September races it sold shirts saying "No Way Fay", and "Throw Another Kiwi on the Barbie."

A Well-Done Roast

In Pete Wilson's latter years as mayor of San Diego, it was said he had two goals: to learn to sing and to become governor.

He took lessons and can manfully handle a tune. The second goal eluded him, and he settled for the U. S. Senate. Now, he's trying to rectify that with his third try at the governorship, with his likely Democratic foe being Atty. Gen. John Van de Kamp.

Thursday night the Republican Wilson was among those roasting Assembly Speaker Willie Brown (D-San Francisco) at a benefit dinner in Oakland.

He joked that he wasn't surprised to find picketers carrying signs urging him to stay in the Senate. What did surprise him, he said, was that one of the signs was carried by Van de Kamp.

==========================================================================================

 
http://ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/843/843.F2d.314.86-6669.html
 
http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/search?q=Frank+George+Prantil&circuit=
 
PUBLIC RECORDS http://public.resource.org/

843 F.2d 314

Frank George PRANTIL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 86-6669.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 23, 1987*.
Memorandum Jan. 4, 1988.
Order and Opinion March 31, 1988.

Frank G. Prantil, Fair Oaks, Cal., pro se.

M. Howard Wayne, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Diego, Cal., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.

Before CHOY, FARRIS and HALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Frank George Prantil, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court's summary dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254.

I.

2

Prantil, formerly an attorney in California, was introduced to Daryl Bell by his client Melvin Goins. Prantil agreed to represent Bell on a criminal charge. A few weeks later a woman purporting to be Bell's mother asked Prantil to help her negotiate an escrow check from which Prantil would receive his fee. Prantil accompanied the woman to his bank where he informed the teller that the woman was his client's mother and that he wanted to deposit the check into his trust account. The woman signed the check, which was made payable to Joanna F. McKnight, and Prantil endorsed it to his trust account. Neither Prantil nor the woman indicated that the check might not be genuine.

3

Subsequently, the owner of an escrow agency discovered that three checks were missing from her office. One of the checks had been made out to Joanna F. McKnight and deposited in Prantil's account. The agent's signature had been forged on the check.

4

Prantil was charged with forgery in violation of Section 470 of the California Penal Code. At trial, Prantil argued he knew nothing of the forgery, and that he had deposited the check merely for collection purposes to see whether it was genuine. To establish that Prantil knew the escrow check was forged, the prosecution introduced evidence concerning four trust deeds which Prantil had prepared. Prantil had received information suggesting that the four deeds were forged and that Goins and Bell, were responsible for the forgeries.

5

Prantil was convicted of forgery and sentenced to two years in prison. The California Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. People v. Prantil, 169 Cal.App.3d 592, 215 Cal.Rptr. 372 (1985). The California Supreme Court denied review and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. Prantil v. California, 475 U.S. 1067, 106 S.Ct. 1381, 89 L.Ed.2d 606 (1986).1

6

Prantil filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court. The district court summarily denied the petition. This court granted Prantil's application for a certificate of probable cause.2

II.

7

Prantil contends that numerous trial court errors and a district court delay in deciding his habeas petition denied him due process.

8

This court reviews de novo a district court's denial of a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987). This court presumes the state court's findings of fact to be correct. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254(d).

III.

9

Prantil contends he was denied due process because the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to establish that he passed the forged escrow check "as true and genuine."3

10

This court determines whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).

11

The evidence established that Prantil received information prior to the transaction which suggested that Goins and Bell were involved in a forgery scheme. He also knew that one of the possible victims of the scheme was Joanna McKnight, who was described to him as an elderly woman between the ages of 78 and 80. Yet, despite this knowledge, when Prantil deposited the escrow check into his trust account he did not inform the teller that the check might be a forgery or that the woman with him, who appeared to be approximately 40 to 45 years of age, might not be the person whose name appeared on the check. He merely endorsed the check and asked that it be deposited into his account.

12

Prantil's knowledge of the previous forgeries and the contradictory descriptions of McKnight could have led the jury to reasonably conclude that by failing to alert the bank, Prantil was attempting to pass the check "as true and genuine." See People v. Williams, 186 Cal.App.2d 420, 424, 8 Cal.Rptr. 871, 873 (1960) (tender of check purporting to be signed by specific person established "true and genuine" requirement). Thus, the district court did not err in the determining there was sufficient evidence for a rational trier of fact to find that the "true and genuine" requirement was established beyond a reasonable doubt.

IV.

13

Prantil contends that the trial court deprived him of due process by giving two erroneous jury instructions.

14

This court evaluates jury instructions "in the context of the overall charge to the jury as a component of the entire trial process." Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1239 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 838, 105 S.Ct. 137, 83 L.Ed.2d 77 (1984). To warrant habeas relief, the instruction cannot be merely "undesirable, erroneous, or even 'universally condemned,' " but must violate some due process right guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment. Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. 141, 146, 94 S.Ct. 396, 400, 38 L.Ed.2d 368 (1973). Moreover, the petitioner in a habeas proceeding has the burden of demonstrating that an erroneous instruction "so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process." Darnell v. Swinney, 823 F.2d 299, 301 (9th Cir.1987), petition for cert. filed, (Oct. 1, 1987).

15

Prantil challenges the trial court's instruction regarding the elements of forgery. He contends that by omitting the "true and genuine" requirement, the trial court denied him his due process right to have the jury consider each element of the charged offense. See Connecticut v. Johnson, 460 U.S. 73, 87-88, 103 S.Ct. 969, 978, 74 L.Ed.2d 823 (1983) (instruction on presumption of intent reversible error because permitted jury to convict defendant without examining evidence concerning essential element of crime).

16

The trial court gave the following instructions on the elements of forgery:

17

Now, in order to prove the commission of such crime [forgery], each of the following elements must be proved, each of them. Here we go.

18

Number one, that a person passed or offered to pass a forged instrument. That is the first one.

19

Two that such person knew that the instrument was forged; and three, that such person passed or offered to pass such instrument with the specific intent to defraud another person or persons.

20

Although the instruction omitted the "true and genuine" requirement, we consider the instruction in conjunction with the other instructions. See Bashor, 730 F.2d at 1239. Prior to giving the challenged instruction the court told the jury:

21

Now, every person with the specific intent to defraud--now, remember that I told you 'specific intent.' That's it. That's specific intent--with the specific intent to defraud another, utters, publishes, passes or attempts to pass or make use--there's a lot of things here--or make use of, as true and genuine, any false, altered, forged or counterfeited instrument or document, knowing the same to be false, altered, forged or counterfeited, is guilty of the crime of forgery. (emphasis added)

22

Because the overall charge to the jury informed them of the true and genuine requirement, Prantil was not denied his due process right to have the jury consider every element of the crime.

23

Prantil also contends he was denied due process because the trial court gave an inapplicable and erroneous jury instruction on aiding and abetting. Prantil argues that the accomplice instruction removed an issue of intent from the jury's consideration and thus constituted reversible error under the reasoning of Johnson and Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S.Ct. 2450, 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979).

24

However, the prosecutor specifically denied that Prantil could be guilty as an aider and abettor instead of as a principal. An erroneous jury instruction does not merit habeas relief if the deficiencies pertain to matters that are not in dispute and the error did not so affect the entire trial as to deprive the defendant of due process. See Darnell, 823 F.2d at 302-03. The trial court gave proper instructions regarding the intent necessary to convict Prantil as a principal to the forgery. Because the prosecution did not present an accomplice theory, any deficiencies went to a matter that was not in dispute. The error did not mislead the jury on a disputed issue and thus did not so infect the trial as to deprive Prantil of due process. Id.

V.

25

Prantil contends that the trial court denied him due process by refusing to grant judicial use immunity to a potentially exonerating witness.

26

On his motion for a new trial, Prantil claimed that Goins could testify that Goins and Bell had set up Prantil, that Prantil was unaware that the check was stolen, and that Bell had lied to Prantil when he said there were criminal charges pending against him. Goins had been unavailable to testify at the trial because he was in prison on an unrelated charge. At the new trial hearing Goins invoked the privilege against self-incrimination and refused to testify at the trial unless he received judicial use immunity because he was in prison on an unrelated charge. The court denied Prantil's motion to grant immunity to Goins.

27

Under California law, a court may only grant immunity on the prosecutor's request. Cal. Penal Code Sec. 1324. See In re Weber, 11 Cal.3d 703, 720, 523 P.2d 229, 240, 114 Cal.Rptr. 429, 440 (1974). However, the prosecution's failure to request immunity violated Prantil's due process rights if it deprived him of his right to a fair trial. See United States v. Garner, 663 F.2d 834, 839 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 905, 102 S.Ct. 1750, 72 L.Ed.2d 161 (1982).

28

Here, Prantil's unsupported assertion is the only indication that Goins would have presented exculpatory testimony had he been granted immunity. The record contains overwhelming evidence that Prantil was not an unwitting accomplice in the crime, much of which would not be controverted by Goins' testimony even if that testimony is as Prantil contends it would be. For example, Prantil knew that the woman who deposited the check in his account did not match the description of the woman whose name appeared on the check. On these facts, we hold that Prantil was not deprived of a fair trial. If Prantil was denied a fair trial in this case, trial courts would be required to grant immunity simply on the basis of unsupported allegations by criminal defendants that immunity is required by due process.

29

Moreover, Prantil has made no showing that any misconduct on the part of the prosecutor caused Goins to invoke his privilege against self-incrimination. See United States v. Lord, 711 F.2d 887, 890-92 (9th Cir.1983).

VI.

30

Prantil contends he was denied due process because of a twenty-month delay between the date of the alleged crime and the date of the indictment.

31

A pre-indictment delay, unlike a delay in bringing a charged defendant to trial, is "tested by general proscriptions of due process."4 Arnold v. McCarthy, 566 F.2d 1377, 1381 (9th Cir.1978). A pre-indictment delay does not justify habeas relief unless the defendant can show actual prejudice. Id. at 1382. To prove actual prejudice a defendant must give more than "mere assertions that ... witnesses' memories may have faded with the passage of time...." United States v. Horowitz, 756 F.2d 1400, 1405 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 822, 106 S.Ct. 74, 88 L.Ed.2d 60 (1985).

32

Prantil contends that he suffered actual prejudice because the bank teller could no longer remember the details of the escrow check transaction. However, the state court of appeals found that the delay did not affect the teller's memory. In addition, the court noted that Prantil was benefited by the teller's unresponsiveness to certain questions; therefore there was no prejudice.

33

Prantil also claims that a seven-month delay between the time he filed his habeas petition and the time the district court dismissed the action violated his right to due process.5

34

In Carter v. Thomas, 527 F.2d 1332 (5th Cir.1976), the Fifth Circuit held that a district court's procedure for handling habeas petitions which routinely resulted in delays of up to twenty months violated due process. However, in Satterlee v. Kritzman, 626 F.2d 682, 683 (9th Cir.1980), we held that a district court's clerical error which resulted in an eight-month delay between the dismissal of a prisoner's habeas petition and the time his files were forwarded to the court of appeals did not deprive the petitioner of any substantive rights. As in Satterlee, here there is no policy of discrimination and no showing that the delay was purposeful.

VII.

35

We conclude that the district court properly dismissed Prantil's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

36

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)

1

Because Prantil's direct appeal presented the same constitutional claims as his subsequent habeas petition, it is unnecessary for him to have filed for state habeas relief. Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987)

2

Prantil was released from prison on April 20, 1987. However, because a felony conviction may cause a defendant to suffer adverse collateral consequences even after he has served his sentence, a defendant's release from custody prior to the completion of his federal habeas corpus proceedings will not render his petition moot. Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234, 237-38, 88 S.Ct. 1556, 1559, 20 L.Ed.2d 554 (1968). Prantil was in custody when he filed the petition in district court, so this court retains jurisdiction over the proceedings after he is released. Id

3

Under California law, a person is guilty of forgery if he passes or attempts to pass as true and genuine a forged instrument with knowledge of the forgery and with the specific intent to defraud. Cal. Penal Code Sec. 470; People v. Hellman, 189 Cal.App.2d 777, 778-79, 11 Cal.Rptr. 433 (1961). The only element Prantil challenges as lacking sufficient evidence is the true and genuine requirement

4

Once a suspect is indicted, the more stringent requirements of the speedy trial right apply. Arnold v. McCarthy, 566 F.2d 1377, 1382 (9th Cir.1978)

5

Prantil first raised the issue in his brief to this court. Ordinarily, this court will not decide an issue which was not raised at the District Court. Bolker v. C.I.R., 760 F.2d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir.1985). The court may decide an issue for the first time on appeal, however, where review is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice or to preserve the integrity of the judicial process. Id. Because a claim that a district court violated a party's due process rights questions the integrity of the federal judicial system, we review Prantil's claim despite his failure to raise it below


OpinionatedAmerican

Tampa,
Florida,
USA

Jan Windglows sound like a CREEP covering up life of CRIME...

#31Consumer Comment

Fri, July 23, 2010

Scam Jan Windglows aka Mystical Jan is wanted for DECEPTION FRAUD; Grand Larceny and Aggravated Harassment.

Jan Windglows aka Mystical Jan 208 - Verifired Convicted Criminal.

Jan on the LAM - Florida FUGITIVE for skiiping Probabtion 90 Day Jail Sentence.

 

Jan on the LAM - DO not use www.bloodloveandlustspells.com PO Box 118 Bonners Ferry, Idaho 208-714-4348 


Dragon

Driggs,
Idaho,
USA

EASY TO VIEW CRIMINAL RECORDS ON MARY T. PRANTIL Complaints - CYBER STALKING & PAY PAL WIRE FRAUD

#31REBUTTAL Individual responds

Fri, July 23, 2010

EASY TO VIEW CRIMINAL RECORDS ON MARY T. PRANTIL Complaints - CYBER STALKING & PAY PAL WIRE FRAUD

Review all EASY TO VIEW CRIMINAL RECORDS ON MARY T. PRANTIL complaints

EASY TO VIEW CRIMINAL RECORDS ON MARY T. PRANTIL

Posted: 2010-07-22 by   Mary Prantil 2 Arrest Warrants Out 4 U
CYBER STALKING & PAY PAL WIRE FRAUD
Complaint Rating:  0 % 
with 0 votes
Company information:
MARY PRANTIL FROM ASTORIA NEW YORK
NA
Astoria, New York
United States
Phone: NA
ashrinetoqueenlilith.net

This Report Concerns Mary T. Prantil of Queens County Astoria New York. You can also find Scam Prantil posting on Rip Off Report and other Forum sites posting against us and others under AKA Honest Person AKA Honestperson AKA Park City USA, AKA Uta,

AKA Pittsburg, AKA Pennsylvania, AKA Washington D.C. AKA Washington, AKA Astoria, New York, AKA Pittsburg, AKA Pennsylvania AKA Park City, AKA Utah AKA Astoria New York AKA Phoenix Arizona AKA SadisticPsychicJanWindglowsHURTME2 - Houston (USA

AKA Unhappy Client - Xxx (U.S.A AKACONArtist-JimMorganNOTaWizardorMagicalPowers AKA Houston (USA AKA SCAMJanWindglowsSpellCastingSchemeOperation AKA Settle USA AKA Astoria USA AKA Honestperson Pittsburg U.S.A.

AKA Cc - Essex United Kingdom AKA Enforcer Of Justice AKA Washington D.C., Washington AKA New York, New York AKA Phoenix Arizona AKA Honestperson Pittsburg U.S.A AKA Enforced Justice

AKA Phoenix USA AKA UK Other AKA PsychicHater (Seattle Washington)United States of America, AKA do not tread on me (Astoria New York AKA OpinionatedAmerican (Tampa Florida)United States of America .


Update On Mary T. Prantil Of Astoria New York

I've waited so long, to both find and post this information on the Forum sites against Miss Prantil. You know, Mary T. Prantil the two bit Internet CRIMINAL Cyber Stalker, LOL. You know, the same IDIOT that just wouldn't go away while the getting was good.

Who moreover felt so compiled in getting up on the internet everyday for four years attempting to scam free services out of unsuspecting online businesses and then viciously attacking and SLANDERING them just because they wouldn't let this parasite get away with conning them.

Of course, she would eventually re-scam and slander the ones she did have a chance to rip off as the years unfolded as in the case of the Mike Cahill and prantil incident, of scandal.

This report is a UPDATE to the first report that focused on revealing Prantil's Criminality, or unlawful activities against 11 to 12 people as the record reflects, and another EIGHT people that the record isn't showing at this time.

I think Prantil was accusing us of stalking at one point along with her other lunatic charges such as us allegedly hacking, tax fraud, credit card fraud etc. Get a load of this charge that was just recently launched against Miss Congeniality by the N.Y Court system just yesterday : 120.50 FE (STALKING 3RD DEGREE E Felony.

I'm sure you've all ready read our charges against her by now such as PROLONGED Telephone and email harassment, Habitual lieing, Tax Evasion, Extortion, Blackmail etc. Get a gander of her updated eight different charges on prantil provided below,

YES I said 8 different charges that she's currently being held there in NY on until she can go to back to court to explain all her actions to the JUDGE'S.

Again, yes, I said Judge's as there are five or six of them all together, Why ? because little Mary has been keeping them all very busy while being brought up on several charges of harassing others around her.

Of course, mary leads a very full life without a dull moment and that's why she's been running around on the internet trying to convince everyone else that she wasn't a two bit low life criminal while all this has been going on behind the scenes.

Running around while hiding behind one of her 33 fictitious names professing to speak the truth, telling her story in how she was the VICTIM of all those big nasty online magick casting businesses. Oh help me, help me everyone because I am the victim of being scammed, being hacked, stalked, slandered etc etc etc.

Poor Little Mary. Did mary get a bad rap by the New York Court system to ?. I mean, are they lieing as well ?, perhaps their just picking on little scammer mary as well. Mary likes to hear herself talk when repeatedly saying " I didn't do anything ",

" I didn't rip off anyone ", "I don't have a criminal record, blah, blah, blah. And lets not forget go ramblings about how great, or how prestigious the prantil family is LOL.

What was it prantil says on one of her sites ? wasn't it something like " Birds Only Pick At The Best Fruit " LOL, I think in Mary's case it would be Buzzards and Crows as they like their fruit rotten. Mary does remind me of something rotten, maybe not fruit but rotten just the same. Maybe I'm thinking rotten with a side order of pound scum when I think of mary.

Of course between bashing Jan and myself Prantil goes on to tell everyone that she's living the American dream and how Madonna is her mentor regarding her seven or eight blog pages. Please keep in mind that this is a 46 year old woman who says this along with her wanting to look like Kate moss lol.

One minute she's a hand and hoof model, and in the same breath she's a cooperate executive on wall street. In all reality prantil was nothing but a assistant secretary working for temporary services making a meager wage far from the six figures she had boasted in making earlier on.

If you visit her blog sites, you'll see this in her job description. Basically, she made the coffee, shuffled papers, received calls, greeted people at the front desk and passed messages to folks working in the various offices from time to time. Of course these jobs didn't last as the longest held job may have been a year or a little over before she was fired for misconduct.

All in all, this is a far cry from her being a self-proclaimed Corporate Executive for HBO, CNN and Cinimax she ranted and raved about over the last three years. Really when you look over prantil's life, you can see that she's always lead a menial life with no hopes of ever going anywhere in the cooperate world.

Maybe this is why she felt it so important to fabricate, or lie about everything under the sun to make a impression on others, to come off bigger then life. Of course this fantasy, illusion of distorted reality became a way of life for prantil and moreover came in handy when mary started her little slamming campaign against us on the net. Her finally tuned imaginary skills came handy when it came to lashing out at others who rubbed her the wrong way, like us lol.


It's interesting how Miss Prantil repeatedly states on her blog pages how Jan and myself are guilty of this and that but never seems to come up with any proof to back up any of her pathetic statements or charges against us, especially when given four years to produce anything to back up the smallest statement made.

Miss Prantil was taken into custody before she could remove these blog pages just for the record, I also think it's important to explain that prantil never dreamed that her criminal records would be made public record by the courts and thus directly disproving her claims of not having a criminal record of any kind.

When she saw these criminal records posted for the first time I bet the blood just drained down to her feet while she was knocked back with surreal disbelief lol. To be on the net bashing several people and then to see your own criminal activities revealed must be a sobering feeling indeed.

Mary also likes to talk about karma and how it's real, well, KARMA is real as she is now finding out. I hope that she thinks of us while sitting in her small little nut cell and how we assisted the DA in putting her there.

I certainly hope she thinks of all the people she's ripped off and harassed over the years, she will have plenty of time to think about a lot of things in my opinion, especially about the curse we placed on her and how it will never go away, it will never be broken,

it will never fade, it will be there looming over her forever. Please read her criminal reports and then go check out these links going to prantil's FANTASY pages. The links are as follows:

http://maryprantilexecutiveassistanttoceo.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/BestMaryPrantil
http://maryprantil.wordpress.com/
http://maryprantilripoffreport.blogspot.com/
http://mary-prantil.blogspot.com/2010/05/mary-prantil-nyc-reputation-faultless.html
http://maryprantilcorrectstherecord.blogspot.com/
http://maryprantilnycamericanhero.blogspot.com/
http://maryprantilexecutiveassistanttoceo.blogspot.com/
http://www.correcttherecord.com/index.php/main_profile/view/53


Prantil is very direct when repeatedly stating that she has Never been arrested, Never been in jail, Never was committed into a psychiatric ward, Never used or sold drugs, Never ripped off online or land biased businesses, Never used any online spell casting services, Never went bankrupt, Always paid her taxes and on and on. Ok, well, Miss Prantil is nothing but a lieing CRIMINAL and I'm about to prove it over and over again.

In the previous report you can see where she owes the U.S Government $ 4000.00 in federal tax & $130.00 state or county tax, not only this but this report shows the Tax Warrants out on her. Prantil does in FACT have a civil and criminal record going back 20 years, back to her childhood in California while growing up under her unethical attorney father that was Disbarred twice

for drug abuse, stealing $700, 000 and lieing over and over to the court when asked about his shady activities with one or two of his Clients that he became personally involved with. The man seems to have been the lowest low life of the legal community when you read what others in the legal community have to say about him, it's all very involved and likened to a scandalous novel when reading over or through it.

As the records show below, Prantil has been arrested several times, then incarcerated as a result for a array of charges ranging from harassment, resisting arrest on to criminal contempt etc. Mary Prantil has been committed to the state hospital in the past however she vigorously denied this,

and then again here recently as you can see when you look her up on the link provided below concerning the RIKERS ISLAND JAIL facility called Rose M. Singer Center. Miss Scammer Prantil will be a guest here in this jail for the next two weeks because their afraid that she will flee justice, as she's done so many times before.

Prantil has also been Court Ordered to submit to a in-depth psychological exam to determine her sanity and moreover her distinction between right from wrong. Mary's not crazy more so then just a out of control petty criminal who's been caught, as they will all find out at the end of the study.

This Simpleton was just picked up on one out of two state Warrants and thus was taken directly to the NUT HOUSE to await the remaining hearings and sentencing that they will ultimately produce against her. seven to eight charges against this five foot and three inch 46 year old woman who starves herself down to a very thin 95 lbs is in a lot of trouble at this point.

You would think that by the time you get to this point in your life it would be apparent that it's not prudent to act like a thirteen year old juvenile delinquent.

The police and Courts have just had enough from what I understand and their tired of her games and thus they locked her up tight to be sure she wouldn't RUN, RUN, RUN away from them again, well mary should be happy now as she's finally around people of her own station, birds of a feather flock together in jail.

Further down in this report it states that bail wasn't an option and that the court ordered her right into the hospital for a undetermined time for the mental evaluation. Again, Mary T. Prantil isn't Crazy even though it would seem so however, she is a two bit manipulating criminal piece of New York TRASH who really knows how to play the system. I wonder how long she can keep up her act for the doctors and courts.

A trick she learned off her UNETHICAL ATTORNEY FATHER I'm sure. Especially, when it came to getting out of drug charges and expunging criminal records in the state of California. Mary says that she doesn't abuse drugs but that not what she told others and ourselves.

I mean, doesn't everyone sit up all night long calling, emailing, maliciously harassing and stalking 16 to 20 people a night four over a four year period and for no apparent reason ? WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE ?, WOW the energy that must take on a nightly basis. I have trouble sending out five emails a day for this or that lol.

Mary says that she doesn't drink but again, we beg to differ with her lol. Mary says that she never had a spell cast with any service be they online or land based. Again, there are five or six on-line magic sites who beg to differ with this claim coming from prantil as we all have records to show service rendered to her.

Prantil states that she never ripped anyone off, yet there are two or three sites who can show that prantil obtained services and then charged back, or wrote them rubber checks for their trouble. We have several on-line businesses who have been harassed by prantil who moreover kept records and recordings of her twenty to thirty calls a night.

Well, Mary can get her head checked out while she waits for judgment day, , maybe she can manipulate her way out of the charges coming down on her. Maybe she can tell the Judge how the whole world is against her and moreover how her voices from God told her to rip off, scam and slander whomever she thought was evil.

Perhaps her voices weren't from God after all and just herself talking to herself. You know, this happens a lot when people start coming apart at the seems, especially when nearing the end of their cycle of terror against others.

We've read when little Mary started using words like scam, liar and slander while accusing others of these despicable acts yet, she was the perpetrator of all of these low caliber deceptions. Again, we hear little miss innocent proclaiming to the world: "Don't believe Rip Off Reports",

" Ed Magedson is a criminal" yet it was Mary Prantil up on the site of Rip Off Reports under twenty or thirty different user names posting liable speech against the innocent in order to destroy their businesses, Not Ed Magedson.

I don't care for ROR but let's give credit where credit is due. ROR may be guilty of being a opportunist site along with many other forum sites however, I've never seen any of these sites openly carry out against others what prantil has consistently carried out against the innocent.

We hear Prantil stating that no one should believe Jan or my reports on the Internet yet, we have produced endless documentation, or piles of verifiable proof against Prantil regarding police records, police eyewitness accounts, accounts from four other magick site owners in what had transpired when prantil came calling on them for the services they
offered and then rendered.

We have produced verifiable records, old and current civil and criminal court records along with audio sound files catching prantil admitting that her spell work did in fact work until she messed it all up through her malicious, disruptive, hostile and over all out of control behavior due to the drug and alcohol abuse.

Miss Prantil likes to use the word HOAX a lot however, the only hoax here was perpetrated on her end. Again, we hear the words scammer, scam, rip off artist yet, when you look back at all the evidence against this fool you can't help knowing who the real scammer, fake or con artist is, wouldn't you agree ?

I know you do especially when looking over the records below. Lastly, when reading over her seven or eight blog pages that she currently has up on us, you will notice her one resounding message being (" DO NOT USE " DO NOT USE " ).

Yes, this statement has been posted over and over again all over the Internet, posted under her thirty or more User names on about every scam site over the net. Further under about every disingenuous story that you can think of as she's attempted to pass herself off as different people in a effort to both draw sympathy and fool the public.

You know, as stupid as it is prantil's reasons were for trying to destroy our business you'd think that she would have just faded away after a while, but as you can see she was still with us four years latter.

Basically her reasons for four years of lieing and harassment was because we wouldn't take any s**t from her, nor would we permit her in scamming us out of services. We wouldn't permit her in bossing us around or posting blatant lies about us on the Internet without confronting her with factual proof disputing all her lies for all to see.

That's it, that's all it took for this scammer to repeatedly attack us for close to four years. The thing that really angers her is in that we EXPOSE her every time we get a chance, or when we see her attempting to scam private persons or businesses.

Miss Prantil said it best when she said " Give them enough rope and they will hang themselves " SHE SHOULD HAVE TAKEN HER OWN ADVICE as she gave everyone the rope to hang her high through her own evil actions against others. Internet Terrorist Mary T. Prantil will now face real justice in the courts of New York while being made to face up to everything she's ever carried out against anyone,

this criminal can get three to five years from what I understand when reading over what she's been technically charged with concerning the N.Y state codes, let's hope so any way.

I hope my faith in the Justice system can be restored once again. As I've said before, we as a Nation should be protected by our laws and thus people like prantil should be locked away under a deep, cold and dark jail in Siberia somewhere far away from the rest of us.

I feel Mary T. Prantil was someone in search of the American dream but never seem to attain it on any level, and it was then that she decided to take a lesser version of it by force by resorting to the loathsome actions as stealing, conning,

lieing and attempting to steal or destroy this same dream that others are so earnestly trying to attain in these despairing times. Again, Marys distorted view of the world and they way things should be carried out in life.

It all came down to jealousy, greed and reinventing herself into something that prantil never had any real hope of becoming in reality. She fancies herself as a Comedian but how can you bring laughter to the world when your bringing so much sadness in its place through your own selfish actions ? you can't.

How can the hopeless one bring love, laughter and hope to the world ?, They can't because love, hope and laughter is nonexistent within them and can't give what you have not to give.

Prantil is a person whom feels that the American dream let her down, or left her behind and thus she decided that she should go for broke and attain this dream in any way possible even if it came at the great expense of others, even if it met breaking societal and spiritual rules across the board.

In short, site policies, state laws, ethics, good morals or positive standers mean ABSOLUTY nothing to this Individual. Religion, faith and other principal's are merely things she stands behind when it's convenient for her to do so, or can be used to achieve her goals.

Mary Prantil is someone who believes the world owes her a living in the process of achieving what she considered to be the American dream. As I've stated in other post, Miss Prantil sure has a funny way of achieving her dreams and further has very little to total disregard for the rights of others in the process.

Many people all over the country have suffered emencly as a direct result of prantil's speech and actions over the last four years and back, Why ? because this person was left unchecked by the legal system for so long not to mentioned her despicable behavior being enabled by her family and others just because they were afraid to step in and do what needed to be done in committing her early on.

Well, it looks like it all coming full circle for prantil now, and the crow has finally come home to roost for lack of better words, I believe that our work has been completed in exposing this sick but criminal personality and there's really nothing more to say other then let this be a lesson to any scammers out there who, like mary,

believe that they are above the laws of the land and like to hide behind little fake names on the Internet while attacking the innocent, or ripping off the innocent. Scammers run both ways on the Internet, or can be found in the Client just as well as in a bad company is the lesson for today.

I will say this to folks out there who like to pick on businesses: Without us you would still be growing your own s**t to eat and making your own clothing to wear, AREN'T YOU HAPPY you have someone to do this for you ? Most Companies and or small businesses AREN'T CRIMINALS so DON'T TREAT US as such. Have some dam respect, Remember that word ? we have respect for you so be kind to us next time you see a Vender on the street or visit a web site.

I would like to say to everyone else that has had a personal conflict with Mary to rest easy now, I don't believe this moron will ever be back to hassle any of us ever again, time to release it and get back to our lives, time to enjoy the peace and quiet we once had before this menace of society came knocking at our doors with all her deceptions,

trickery and games of scorn. Enjoy the postings exposing this Internet criminal for what she has always been, a ignorant fool. Even though Mary had spells cast for her situation many times over she never believed in them even when they worked in her life.

Ok, back to Miss Prantil, I wonder if she believes in the Curse we cast against her now because she didn't seem to before lol. The spell we cast against prantil in order to stop her madness against the innocent. What was that you said Mary ?,

wasn't it something like God shall TRAMPLE the Dragon ? Well mary, someone did get trampled here but it wasn't my beautiful Jan or Dragon self, I think it's safe to say that you were trampled under Divinities foot as evil can't exist in the presence of divine righteousness.

Let's hope that the state of New York continues to carry out its duty in the instance of Mary T. Prantil. Perhaps when it's all done, and when the judgments have been all passed, we as a society can been secure in that our system continues to work. Again, perhaps Mary T. Prantil will be lawfully RESTRAINED and kept away from law abiding citizens until which time she can function normally in society, if ever.

If you would like to verify this on going criminal record on Miss Mary T. Prantil then please go to the address link below, be sure to click for updates as this case is still unfolding. If your not into looking up records we understand and thus the easy to access and read Queen Lilith Site is there for you at www.ashrinetoqueenlilith.net.

The Lilith site was constructed out of necessity due to the prolonged cyber attacks we've endured as a direct result of mary prantil attempting to destroy our business over the last four years. On this particular site you can view her entire criminal history along with several sound files catching her in the act of habitually lying, threatening, blackmailing, extortion etc.

You will also read through the transcripts and eyewitness accounts along with transcripts of what actually transpired between her and the sites that were foolish enough to take on her cases.

The entire purposes of this site isn't to defame, embarrass or humiliate prantil however, it is about presenting the facts in a fair and truthful way while defending ourselves against the onslaught of her endless accusations. This is a defense site that were in essence excursing our right to free speech found under the first amendment of the United States Constitution.


Instructions Of How To Look Up Mary Prantil's Incarceration Information By Following These Instructions. Go to the following link which is the NYC jail inmate lookup:http://a072-web.nyc.gov/inmatelookup/

After the page has been pulled up, you will see the place where to enter Mary Prantil's Booking and Case Number, which is 3471001054- simply enter that number in the white box, as shown below.

As you will see, the NYC Department Of Corrections has all her criminal information and charges posted. As we have said numerous times in the past, we have proof of what we have been warning the public about this criminal Mary Prantil all along,

so see for yourself- go to the link, enter her book and case number, the information is current and is all there for anyone because it is PUBLIC RECORD. The facts, simply put.


http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcrim_attorney/CaseIdentifierSearch?txtCaseNumber=2009NY002655&txtSummonsNumber=&cboCounty=30&pageNumber=1&fromEmail=Y

MARY PRANTIL

NYSID: 03088617J

Age: 46

Sex: Female

Race: White

Height: 5 ft 3 inches

Weight: 95 lbs

Hair Color: Blonde

Eye Color: Green

Nativity: New York

Booking Information Incarceration: 2010-06-14

Book & Case Number: 3471001054

Facility: Rose M. Singer Center

Arrest Date: 2010-06-14

Arrest Number: COURT DIRECT

Next Court Date: 2010-06-30

Projected Release Date:

Actual Release Date:

Discharge Reason:

Bail & Bond: Remanded


Charge Information

Docket: 2010NY022485

Indictment: 00000 0000

Charges: 120.50 FE (STALKING 3RD DEGREE E Felony)

240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor)

240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor)

Docket: 2009NY002655

Indictment: 00000 0000

Charges: 240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor)

205.30 MA (RESISTING ARREST A Misdemeanor)

Docket: 2009NY046033

Indictment: 00000 0000

Charges:

240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor)

240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor)

215.50 MA (CRIMINAL CONTEMP- 2ND A Misdemeanor)

Ten Jails on Rikers Island
List Part 2
Rose M. Singer Center
Address:
19-19 Hazen St.,
East Elmhurst, N.Y.
11370

Rose M. Singer Center was opened in June 1988 as an 800-bed facility for female detainees and sentenced inmates. http://www.correctionhistory.org/html/chronicl/nycdoc/html/jailst1a.html#RMSC

Section 240.26 Harassment in the second degree

A person is guilty of harassment in the second degree when, with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person:

1. He or she strikes, shoves, kicks or otherwise subjects such other person to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the same; or

2. He or she follows a person in or about a public place or places; or

3. He or she engages in a course of conduct or repeatedly commits acts which alarm or seriously annoy such other person and which serve no legitimate purpose.

Sub-divisions two and three of this section shall not apply to activities regulated by the national labor relations act, as amended, the railway labor act, as amended, or the federal employment labor management act, as amended.

Harassment in the second degree is a violation.


Section 240.30 Aggravated harassment in the second degree.

A person is guilty of aggravated harassment in the second degree when, with intent to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm another person, he or she:

1. Either (a) communicates with a person, anonymously or otherwise by telephone, or by telegraph, mail or any other form of written communication, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm; or (b) causes a communication to be initiated by mechanical or electronic means or otherwise, with a person, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, or by telegraph, mail or any other form of written communication, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm; or

2. Makes a telephone call, whether or not a conversation ensues, with no purpose of legitimate communication; or

3. Strikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise subjects another person to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the same because of a belief or perception regarding such person's race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, religion, religious practice, age, disability or sexual orientation, regardless of whether the belief or perception is correct; or

4. Commits the crime of harassment in the first degree and has previously been convicted of the crime of harassment in the first degree as defined by section 240.25 of this article within the preceding ten years.

Aggravated harassment in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor.


PRANTIL'S UPDATES ON THE LILITH SITE
http://www.ashrinetoqueenlilith.net/iwitnessesevidence.html

http://www.ashrinetoqueenlilith.net/cursespelltapes.html

http://www.ashrinetoqueenlilith.net/moreevidencelinks.html

http://www.ashrinetoqueenlilith.net/endingstatement.html


Criminal Records For Mary T. Prantil In Queens Astoria & Manhattan New York

http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcrim_attorney/DefendantSearch
NEW YORK New York Criminal Court
Docket: 2009NY046033
Defendant: Prantil, Mary T
Born 1964

Defendant Characteristics


Sex: Female
Race: White
Height: 5 Feet 3 Inches
Weight: 100 pounds
Eye Color: Green
Hair Color: Blond
Ethnicity: Unknown

Arrest/Incident Date/Time


Arrest Date: June 9, 2009
Arrest Time: 11:00
Incident Date: May 6, 2009
Incident Time: 04:42

Case Related Numbers


Criminal Justice Tracking Number: 63615729R
NYSID Number: 3088617J
Arrest Number: M09652561
Summons/Ticket Number:

BAC and Vehicle Info


Blood Alcohol Content:
Vehicle Info: N/A

Arresting Officer Info


Name: SHEEKO
Shield Number: 6560
Tax Registry Number:
Agency: NYPD
Officer Command: 20

Confidentially Search for Records

You are searching for records on
First Name: mary
Last Name: prantil
State: NY
DOB: 19640127


MARY THERESA PRANTIL AKA: MARY T PRANTIL AKA: PRANTIL, MARY Year Of Birth: 1964 (46)

Address City State Zip

32-85 C2 33 ST ASTORIA NY 11106

3285 33RD ST C2 ASTORIA NY 11106

32-85 33 ST ASTORIA NY 11106

251 E 32ND ST 2C NEW YORK NY 10016

251 E 32ND ST 17F NEW YORK NY 10016

3285 33 WUSD 69 ASTORIA NY 11106

1352 PO BOX NEW YORK NY 10150

PO BOX 1352 NEW YORK NY 10150

Voter Information Name : MARY T PRANTIL

Residential Address : 32-85 33 STREET C2, ASTORIA, NY 11106

Mailing Address (if any) : Political Party : Democratic

Voter Status : Active

Voter District Information Election District : 59

County Legislative District :

Senate District : 12 Assembly District : 30

Congressional District : 14 Town : QUEENS Ward :

Case Information Court New York Criminal Court

Case # 2009NY002655

Defendant Prantil, Mary T

Index
Defendant

* Name:Prantil, Mary T
* Birth Year:1964
* NYSID: 3088617J
* Status:

Incident and Arrest
Incident

* Date:June 22, 2008
* Summons/Ticket #:
* CJTN: 63355383N

Arrest

* Date & Time:January 9, 2009 20:45
* Arrest #: M09602686

Officer

* Agency:NYPD
* Command:20

Attorney Information
Defense Attorney

* Name:Unk,
* Type:Private (Retained)
* Court Date:January 10, 2009
* Court Part:APAR3

Assistant District Attorney

* Name:
* Assigned:February 20, 2009

Next Appearance

* Date:June 14, 2010
* Court:New York Criminal Court
* Part:B

Docket Sentence
No Sentence Information on File
Incident and Arrest
Incident

* Date:June 22, 2008
* Summons/Ticket #:
* CJTN: 63355383N

Arrest

* Date & Time:January 9, 2009 20:45
* Arrest #: M09602686

Officer

* Agency:NYPD
* Command:20

Attorney Information
Defense Attorney

* Name:Unk,
* Type:Private (Retained)
* Court Date:January 10, 2009
* Court Part:APAR3

Assistant District Attorney

* Name:
* Assigned:February 20, 2009

Next Appearance

* Date:June 14, 2010
* Court:New York Criminal Court
* Part:B

Docket Sentence
No Sentence Information on File
Defendant

* Name:Prantil, Mary T
* Birth Year:1964
* NYSID: 3088617J
* Status:

Incident and Arrest
Incident

* Date:June 22, 2008
* Summons/Ticket #:
* CJTN: 63355383N

Arrest

* Date & Time:January 9, 2009 20:45
* Arrest #: M09602686

Officer

* Agency:NYPD
* Command:20

Attorney Information
Defense Attorney

* Name:Unk,
* Type:Private (Retained)
* Court Date:January 10, 2009
* Court Part:APAR3

Assistant District Attorney

* Name:
* Assigned:February 20, 2009

Next Appearance

* Date:June 14, 2010
* Court:New York Criminal Court
* Part:B

Docket Sentence
No Sentence Information on File
Defendant

* Name:Prantil, Mary T
* Birth Year:1964
* NYSID: 3088617J
* Status:

Incident and Arrest
Incident

* Date:June 22, 2008
* Summons/Ticket #:
* CJTN: 63355383N

Arrest

* Date & Time:January 9, 2009 20:45
* Arrest #: M09602686

Officer

* Agency:NYPD
* Command:20

Attorney Information
Defense Attorney

* Name:Unk,
* Type:Private (Retained)
* Court Date:January 10, 2009
* Court Part:APAR3

Assistant District Attorney

* Name:
* Assigned:February 20, 2009

Next Appearance

* Date:June 14, 2010
* Court:New York Criminal Court
* Part:B

Docket Sentence
No Sentence Information on File
Case Information Court New York Criminal Court
Case # 2009NY002655
Defendant Prantil, Mary T
Index
Defendant

* Name:Prantil, Mary T
* Birth Year:1964
* NYSID: 3088617J
* Status:

Incident and Arrest
Incident

* Date:June 22, 2008
* Summons/Ticket #:
* CJTN: 63355383N

Arrest

* Date & Time:January 9, 2009 20:45
* Arrest #: M09602686

Officer

* Agency:NYPD
* Command:20

Attorney Information
Defense Attorney

* Name:Unk,
* Type:Private (Retained)
* Court Date:January 10, 2009
* Court Part:APAR3

Assistant District Attorney

* Name:
* Assigned:February 20, 2009

Next Appearance

* Date:June 14, 2010
* Court:New York Criminal Court
* Part:B

Docket Sentence
No Sentence Information on File

Case Details - Appearances

Case Information Court New York Criminal Court

Case # 2009NY002655

Defendant Prantil, Mary T

Date/

Part Judge Calendar

Section Arraignment/

Hearing Type Court

Reporter Outcome/

Release Status

06/14/2010
B
PENDING No Type

03/24/2010
B Unknown, PENDING No Type Test,
Case Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
RoR Continued

03/09/2010
B Whiten, M PENDING No Type Johnson, S
Case Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
RoR Continued

03/03/2010
B
PENDING No Type Unk,
Case Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
RoR Continued
02/17/2010
B
PENDING No Type Oviedo, Y
Case Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
RoR Continued

12/10/2009
B Mcgrath, K PENDING No Type Barna, C
Case Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
RoR Continued

10/28/2009
B Burke, J PENDING No Type Morrison,
Case Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
Released on Recognizance

08/10/2009
B Burke, J PENDING No Type Barna,
Case Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
Cash $1 (Cash)

07/28/2009
B Whiten, M PENDING No Type Burrofato,
Court Adjourned - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
Bond $1 (Not Posted)

06/09/2009
B Ross, N PENDING No Type Barna,
Case Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
RoR Continued

04/02/2009
B Kamins, B PENDING No Type Rodriguez, I
Case Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
RoR Continued

02/20/2009
B Burke, J PENDING No Type Bent, A
Case Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
RoR Continued

01/10/2009
APAR3 Allen, B PENDING Pre-Arraignment Deposition Given Harris, V
Case Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
Released on Recognizance

Case Details - Charges
Case Information Court New York Criminal Court
Case # 2009NY002655
Defendant Prantil, Mary T

Charge Detail Disposition/Sentence
PL 205.30 00
**TOP CHARGE** A Misdemeanor, 1 count, Arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description Resisting Arrest

PL 240.30 01 A Misdemeanor, 1 count, Arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description Agg Harass-2:communicate/alarm

Case Details - Motions
Case Information Court New York Criminal Court
Case # 2009NY002655

Defendant Prantil, Mary T
There are no motions on record for this case.

Charge Detail Disposition/Sentence L 240.30 02 Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionAgg Har-2nd:telephone

L 215.50 03 Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionCrim Contempt-2nd:disobey Crt
L 240.30 1A

**TOP CHARGE** Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionAggravated Harassment-2nd Deg


Court: Queens Civil Supreme
Index Number: 022186/2009
Case Name: 3285 REALTY COMPANY LLC vs. PRANTIL, MARY
Case Type: Other Real Property
Track: Expedited

Motion Information:

Motion
Number Date
Filed Filed
By Relief Sought Submit
Date Answer
Demanded Status Decision Order
Signed Date

001 02/04/2010 PLAINT Change Or Remove Attorney 03/04/2010 No Decided: 04-MAR-10
MOTION GRANTED
Before Justice: PINEDA-KIRWAN Short Form Order 03/04/2010


Court: Queens Civil Supreme
Index Number: 022186/2009
Case Name: 3285 REALTY COMPANY LLC vs. PRANTIL, MARY
Case Type: Other Real Property
Track: Expedited
RJI Filed: 01/26/2010
Date NOI Due:
NOI Filed:
Disposition Deadline:
Disposition Date:
Calendar Number:
Jury Status:
Justice Name: DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN


Attorney/Firm For Plaintiff:
MARK S. FRIELANDER Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record Atty. Status: Active
150 BROADWAY
NEW YROK, N.Y. 10038
212 962-2877

Attorney/Firm For Defendant:
ATTORNEY RELIEVED Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record Atty. Status: Active
32-30 87th Street
East Elmhurst 11369
718-426-7424

Date
Part Judge Calendar
Section Arraignment/
Hearing Type Court
Reporter Outcome/
Release Status 6/14/2010
B ENDING o Type

3/24/2010
B nknown, ENDING o Type est,
ase Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
RoR Continued 3/09/2010

B hiten, M ENDING o Type ohnson, S
ase Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
RoR Continued 3/03/2010

B ENDING o Type nk,
ase Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
Released on Recognizance 2/17/2010

B ENDING o Type viedo, Y
ase Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
Bail Continued 2/10/2009

B cgrath, K ENDING o Type arna, C
ase Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
Bail Continued 0/28/2009

B urke, J ENDING o Type orrison,
ase Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
Bail Continued 8/10/2009

B urke, J ENDING o Type arna,
ase Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
Bail Continued 7/28/2009

B hiten, M ENDING o Type urrofato,
ourt Adjourned - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
Bail Continued 6/15/2009

C andelbaum, R ENDING o Type ames, C
ase Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
Bond $500 Cash $500 (Cash) 6/10/2009

APAR2 hiten, M ENDING re-Arraignment Deposition Given ilion,
ase Continued (adjourned) - Temporary Order Of Protection Issued
Bond $500 Cash $500 (Not Posted)

NEW YORK New York Criminal Court
Docket 2009NY046033
Defendant Prantil, Mary T

Law Code and Code Section/Subsection


PL 240.30 02

Charge Detail


A Misdemeanor, 1 count count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description: AGG HAR-2ND:TELEPHONE

Disposition/Sentence


Law Code and Code Section/Subsection


PL 215.50 03

Charge Detail


A Misdemeanor, 1 count count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description: CRIM CONTEMPT-2ND:DISOBEY CRT

Disposition/Sentence


Law Code and Code Section/Subsection


PL 240.30 1A *** TOP CHARGE ***

Charge Detail


A Misdemeanor, 1 count count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
Description: AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT-2ND DEG

Disposition/Sentence


Court: Queens County Civil Court

Index Number: CV-071786-09/QU

Case Name: GE MONEY BANK
vs.
PRANTIL, MARY

Case Type: Civil

Classification: Consumer Credit

Filing Date: 06/18/2009

Disposition Date:

Calendar Number:

Jury Demand: No

Judge Name:

Attorney/Firm(s) For Plaintiff - GE MONEY BANK:

Rubin & Rothman LLC Attorney Type: Firm

1787 Veterans Highway Suite 32

P.O.Box 9003

Islandia, New York 11749-

(631) 234-1500 ext:

Attorney/Firm(s) For Defendant - MARY PRANTIL:

Edit Draft LOOK TAX EVATION PRANTIL
...


https://www.integrascan.com/search_results.php?type


County in which warrant is filed of Taxpayer Searched:

MARY PRANTIL Not Applicable QUEENS

Your name selection(s) has returned 1 State Tax Lien Notice histories.
Back Button

Warrant ID# : E-029211902-W001-3

Name of Taxpayer as appears on warrant

Address of Taxpayer as appears on warrant

MARY PRANTIL 32-85 33 ST C2

ASTORIA, NY 11106

Date Warrant docketed by county clerk County where Warrant is docketed Tax Liability amount as appears on Warrant Date notice of tax warrant, amendment, vacation or satisfaction was filed by the Department of Taxation and Finance with the Department of State.

Date Warrant satisfaction docketed by county clerk Date Warrant Vacate Notice docketed by county clerk Date Warrant amendment docketed by county clerk
June 10, 2008 QUEENS $106.21 June 20, 2008


Warrant ID# : E-029159448-W001-7

Name of Taxpayer as appears on warrant

Address of Taxpayer as appears on warrant

MARY PRANTIL 32-85 33 ST C2

ASTORIA, NY 11106

Date Warrant docketed by county clerk County where Warrant is docketed Tax Liability amount as appears on Warrant Date notice of tax warrant, amendment, vacation or satisfaction was filed by the Department of Taxation and Finance with the Department of State. Date Warrant satisfaction docketed by county clerk Date Warrant Vacate Notice docketed by county clerk Date Warrant amendment docketed by county clerk
February 14, 2008 QUEENS $4, 072.14 February 14, 2008


* Filed with Department of State on or prior to implementation of electronic filing system, January 8, 2004. Dates for filings made prior to January 8, 2004 must be derived from paper filings and should be obtained from the Department of Taxation and Finance.

Taxpayer Name(s) Selected: City specified in warrant address record of Taxpayer Searched: County in which warrant is filed of Taxpayer Searched: MARY PRANTIL Not Applicable QUEENS

NEW YORK New York Criminal Court
Docket 2009NY046033
Defendant Prantil, Mary T

Appearance Information: Appearance

Part & Date Judge Calendar

Section Court

Reporter Release

Status Arraignment

Type Hearing

Type Docket

Detail

B, June 14, 2010 Pending No Type

B, March 24, 2010 UNKNOWN, Pending TEST, RoR Continued No Type CASE CONTINUED (ADJOURNED) - Temporary Order of Protection Issued

B, March 9, 2010 WHITEN, M Pending JOHNSON, S RoR Continued No Type CASE CONTINUED (ADJOURNED) - Temporary Order of Protection Issued

B, March 3, 2010 Pending UNK, Released on Recognizance No Type CASE CONTINUED (ADJOURNED) - Temporary Order of Protection Issued

B, February 17, 2010 Pending OVIEDO, Y Bail Continued No Type CASE CONTINUED (ADJOURNED) - Temporary Order of Protection Issued

B, December 10, 2009 MCGRATH, K Pending BARNA, C Bail Continued No Type CASE CONTINUED (ADJOURNED) - Temporary Order of Protection Issued

B, October 28, 2009 BURKE, J Pending MORRISON, Bail Continued No Type CASE CONTINUED (ADJOURNED) - Temporary Order of Protection Issued

B, August 10, 2009 BURKE, J Pending BARNA, Bail Continued No Type CASE CONTINUED (ADJOURNED) - Temporary Order of Protection Issued

B, July 28, 2009 WHITEN, M Pending BURROFATO, Bail Continued No Type COURT ADJOURNED - Temporary Order of Protection Issued

C, June 15, 2009 MANDELBAUM, R Pending JAMES, C Bond $500 Cash $500 (Cash) No Type CASE CONTINUED (ADJOURNED) - Temporary Order of Protection Issued

APAR2, June 10, 2009 WHITEN, M Pending FILION, Bond $500 Cash $500

(Not Posted) Pre-Arraignment Deposition Given CASE CONTINUED (ADJOURNED) - Temporary Order of Protection Issued

Docket Information:
Standards and Goals Age Defendant Status


Docket Sentence Information:
Docket Sentence
No Data Available

Defense Attorney Information:
Name Type Court Date Court Part Firm Name Phone Number Address
UNK, 18B (Assigned) June 10, 2009 APAR2

Assistant District Attorney Information:
Name Assignment Date
June 15, 2009

Defendant Docket Number Summons Number Appearance Date County / Court / Part Judge Prantil, Mary T 2009NY002655 06/14/2010 NEW YORK / New York Criminal Court / B Prantil, Mary T 2009NY046033 06/14/2010 NEW YORK / New York Criminal Court / B

State of California & Queens NY Criminal & Civil Records On Mary T. Prantil


Civil Supreme - Case Detail

Court: Queens Civil Supreme

Index Number: 031093/2002

Case Name: PRANTIL, MARY vs. LAMPROPOULOS, CHRISTOPHER ANO

Case Type: Motor Vehicle

Track: Complex

RJI Filed: 11/28/2003

Date NOI Due:

NOI Filed:

Disposition Deadline:

Disposition Date:

Calendar Number:

Jury Status:

Justice Name: COMPLIANCE CONF JUDGE

Attorney/Firm For Plaintiff:
GEOGHAN & COHEN Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record Atty. Status: Active
7 PENN PLAZA SUITE 505
NEW YORK NY 10001
212-465-0600

Attorney/Firm For Defendant:
JERROLD N. COHEN Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record Atty. Status: Active
163 MINEOLA BLVD - POB #229
MINEOLA, NY 11501
1 - 718 - 895 - 3215

ISSERLIS AND SULLIVAN, ESQ., Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record Atty. Status: Active
999 STEWART AVENUE
BETHPAGE, NEW YORK 11714
516-349 0111

Court: Queens Civil Supreme
Index Number: 022186/2009
Case Name: 3285 REALTY COMPANY LLC vs. PRANTIL, MARY
Case Type: Other Real Property
Track: Expedited


Appearance Information:

Appearance

Date Time On For Appearance

Outcome Justice /

Part Comments Motion
Seq

05/24/2010 Supreme Trial DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN
PT 36 PRELIM CONF

05/19/2010 Supreme Trial Remove Stay DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN
PT 36 GEN CAL

03/04/2010 Motion Fully Submitted DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN
PT 36 MOTIONS OSC=LIC 001

02/22/2010 Supreme Trial Stayed-Attorney Relieved DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN
PT 36 PRELIM CONF 45 DAYS PER SFO 3/4/10

02/08/2010 Supreme Initial (first time on) Adjourned DICCIA T. PINEDA-KIRWAN
PT 36 PRELIM CONF

===========================================================
Previous address Locations & Criminal Records Of Mary T. Prantil
3285 33rd St, Astoria, NY 11106
Reported:12/01/2002

251
32nd St, New York, NY 10016
Reported:07/18/2001

3285 33 Wusd # 69,
Astoria, NY 11106
Reported:06/01/2001

3044 1st Ave, San Diego, CA
92103
Reported:11/13/2000

1352 PO Box, New York, NY
10150
Reported:06/18/1997

3044 Juniper St # 2, San Diego, CA
92104
Reported:10/01/1995

1154 22nd # 2, San Diego, CA
92102
Reported:12/01/1993

319 Gravilla St, La Jolla, CA
92037
Reported:08/01/1992

Criminal Court Records

Criminal
Profile
Subject Name:
PRANTIL, MARY THERESA
Date:
12/8/2007 3:45:39
PM

Name:
PRANTIL, MARY THERESA
Source
State:
AOCDOCCourts
County:
SAN DIEGO
Date
Reported(CA):
10/30/2006

Offense: 1
NOT SPECIFIED BY
STATE
Offense State:
CA
Offense County:
SAN DIEGO
Case Number:
M695524

Name:
PRANTIL, MARY
THERESA
Source State:
AOCDOCCourts
County:
SAN DIEGO
Date
Reported(CA):
10/30/2006

Offense: 1
NOT SPECIFIED BY
STATE
Offense State:
CA
Offense County:
SAN DIEGO
Case Number:
T105836

Name:
PRANTIL, MARY
THERESA
Source State:
AOCDOCCourts
County:
SAN DIEGO
Date
Reported(CA):
10/30/2006

Offense: 1
NOT SPECIFIED BY
STATE
Offense State:
CA
Offense County:
SAN DIEGO
Case Number:
T108343

Name:
PRANTIL, MARY
THERESA
Source State:
AOCDOCCourts
County:
SAN DIEGO
Date
Reported(CA):
10/30/2006

Offense: 1
NOT SPECIFIED BY
STATE
Offense State:
CA
Offense County:
SAN DIEGO
Case Number:
T110326

Name:
PRANTIL, MARY
THERESA
Source State:
AOCDOCCourts
County:
SAN DIEGO
Date
Reported(CA):
10/30/2006

Offense: 1
NOT SPECIFIED BY
STATE
Offense State:
CA
Offense County:
SAN DIEGO
Case Number:
T120948

Criminal Court
Records

Name: PRANTIL, MARY T
Case Number: M598531
Case County: San Diego
Source State: CA
Case File Date: 03/23/1990

Name:
PRANTIL, MARY THERESA
Case Number:
M695524
Case County: San Diego
Source State: CA
Case File Date: 02/01/1995

Name:
PRANTIL, MARY THERESA
Case Number:
T105836
Case County: San Diego
Source State: CA
Case File Date: 11/13/1992

Name:
PRANTIL, MARY THERESA
Case Number:
T108343
Case County: San Diego
Source State: CA
Case File Date: 01/04/1993

Name:
PRANTIL, MARY THERESA
Case Number:
T110326
Case County: San Diego
Source State: CA
Case File Date: 02/02/1993

Name:
PRANTIL, MARY THERESA
Case Number:
T120948
Case County: San Diego
Source State: CA
Case File Date:
08/09/1993

Bankruptcies, Tax Liens & Judgments by Name for:
Name:
PRANTIL, MARY T
Address:
PO BOX 1352, NEW YORK NY
10150

Action:
STATE TAX LIEN
Court:
SACRAMENTO COUNTY COURT
(RD)
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Case:
9706100302
(06/10/1997)
Liability/Assests:
$1, 310.00/NA

Name:
PRANTIL,
MARY T
Address:
251 E 32ND ST #2C, NEW YORK NY
10016

Action:
BANKRUPTCY
Court:
NEW YORK FED COURT-NEW YORK CITY
(NEW YORK County)
Case:
9640110
(01/11/1996)
Liability/Assests:
NA/NA

Name:
PRANTIL, MARY
T
Address:
251 E 32ND ST #2C, NEW YORK NY
10016

Action:
BANKRUPTCY
Court:
NEW YORK FED COURT-NEW YORK CITY
(NEW YORK County)
Plaintiff:
PRO SE
Case:
9640110
(01/11/1996)
Liability/Assests:
NA/NA

Judgement Against
Name:
PRANTIL, MARY T
Address: 3038
DICKENS ST, SAN DIEGO CA 92106
Action: SMALL CLAIMS JUDGMENT
Court: KEARNEY MESA MUNI - SAN DIEGO
CO
Plaintiff: LIBS CHIROPRACTOR
CENTER
Case: 570215
(12/19/1991)
Liability/Assests: $2,
198.00/NA

Supreme Court - Motion Detail

Court: Queens Civil Supreme
Index Number: 031093/2002
Case Name: PRANTIL, MARY vs. LAMPROPOULOS, CHRISTOPHER ANO
Case Type: Motor Vehicle
Track: Complex

Appearance Information:

Appearance

Date Time On For Appearance

Outcome Justice /

Part Comments Motion

Seq

10/26/2004 Supreme Trial Stayed-Bankruptcy ALLAN B. WEISS
PRENOTE COMPLIANCE CONFERENCE INTERBORO

01/05/2004 Supreme Trial Preliminary Conference Held ALLAN B. WEISS
PT 2 PRELIM CONF

12/22/2003 Supreme Initial (first time on) Adjourned ALLAN B. WEISS
PT 2 PRELIM CONF


Mary T. Prantil's Father Frank G. Prantil DISBARMENT Records


SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. D-787

110 S. Ct. 493, 493 U.S. 972, 107 L. Ed. 2d 497, 58 U.S.L.W. 3351, 1989.SCT.45677 <http://www.versuslaw.com>

November 27, 1989

IN THE MATTER OF DISBARRMENT OF FRANK G. PRANTIL

For earlier order herein, see Rehnquist, Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy

It having been reported to the Court that Frank G. Prantil, of Fair Oaks, California, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of California and this Court by order of May 15, 1989, having suspended the said Frank G. Prantil from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued;

It is ordered that the said Frank G. Prantil be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

Disposition

Disbarrment entered.

19891127

1998 VersusLaw Inc.

http://wi.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.%5CSCT%5CSCT2%5C1989%5C19891127_0045677.SCT.htm/qx

 


OpinionatedAmerican

Tampa,
Florida,
United States of America

Scams Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan Coven of Convicted Criminals DO NOT USE www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

#31Consumer Comment

Mon, July 19, 2010

SCAMMERS Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan COVEN of Convicted Criminals for DECEPTION FRAUD, Grand Larceny - DO NOT USE www.bloodloveandlustspells.com OpinionatedAmerican - Tampa (United States of America)

SCAMMERS Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan COVEN of Convicted Criminals for ECEPTIONFRAUD, Grand Larceny - DO NOT USE www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

Spell Casting SCAM (JanWindglowSCAM) on Twitter click onto this Twitter READ most recent Ripoff of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com Post your Rip-off of these COVEN of Criminals

Call the Police give whereabouts of these Gypsy SCUM wanted for Deception Fraud and 15 yrs of Western Union PayPal Rip-offs DO NOT USE www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

Deception Fraud is associated with Gypsys, Spell Caster, Psychics and most Cons-Artist- It is the CRIME of promising results for a price. For Example: For $5000 I will reunite you and your X-Girlfriend.

SCAM Jan Windglows Convicted Criminal of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com crimes of DECEPTION FRAUD Beware Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan are convicted Criminals that are FUGITIVES for Deception Fraud, Identity Theft, Grand Larceny and Aggravated Harassment. Queen of the COVEN of Scammers SCAM Jan or Janhett T. Windglows changes alias as much as she is COVICTED of Deception FRAUD, Grand Larceny and Identity Theft. This SCAM Jim Morgan of www.bloodlloveandlustspells.com is a convicted Criminal for Deception Fraud, Identity Theft and Grand Larceny. SCAM Jim Morgan sounds like a creepy guy covering up his lifetime of CRIME. Yes, Jim Morgan aka James Morgan employee of Jan Windglows, has a Criminal Record. SCAM Jim Morgan has not filed his tax returns and will be headed to the JAIL HOUSE as soon as the authorities cant find Jim Morgan because he only provides a PO BOX. SCAM Jim Morgan is the authority on such subjects as Courts; Jails; and Penal Laws because Jim Morgan has bee3n in and out of Jails for years and has a RAP Sheet including Conviction for Identity Theft; Grand Larceny; Deception Fraud; Tax Evasion; and Aggravated Harassment SCAM Jim Morgan is on the run from the FLORIDA POLICE but can't be found as he only provides a PO BOX. ONLY an idiot would pay money to Spell Caster CRIMINAL Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan ONLY want is your MONEY. SCAM Jan Windglows sounds like a CRACK Addict desperately trying to make money !!! Jan Windglows has a RAP Sheet with many convictions for Identity Theft; Deception Fraud; Grand Larceny and Aggravated Harassment. www.bloodloveandlustspells.com - SOUNDs like a SCAM Site - Spells do not work. Witchcraft is EVIL Say to the Lord, you are my refuge and my fortress; God shall trample the dragon. SCAMMERS, Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan are harassing many people on the Internet and posting FRAUD. Infact - do you notice that Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan NEVER have provided a "Conviction Date" or Indictment date of this poor woman in NYC Proof of harassing and stalking on the Internet- BEWARE it could be you next. Scammers Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan just want your MONEY. I called the NYC woman who reported them to the police in 200. Cyber Stalker and CREEP Jim Morgan stole over $1500 then charged her card $5000. The only CRIMINALS are Jan Windglows, Mike Cahill, Celeste Morgan, Mike Jenkins, and Jim Morgan. HEY - Jim Morgan - what about actual Conviction Dates or Indictment dates for this NYC woman you and Jan Windglows are harassing? Why didnt you mention July 15, 2010 Court Date how the case is falling apart and you are a PAID informant for the NY DA who is now being investigated for Prosecutal Negligence..and being taken OFF the case! NYC NUTS Gay Scott, Minister Meredith and FAT Kova are found out !!! Hey Jim Morgan the only CRIMINALS are you and Jan Windglows who are trying to cover up your life of CRIME!!! SCAMS Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan are Convicted Criminals for Deception FRAUD, Grand Larceny, Aggravsted Harasssment. CALL POLICE GIVE WHAREABOUTS OF THESE FUGITIVES THAT ONLY PROVIDE A - PO BOX AND NOT A REAL ADDDRESS. SCAMMERS Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan are verified Criminal with several convictions for Deception FRAUD, Grand Larceny and Aggravated Harassment. Do not use www.bloodloveandlustspells.com - SCAM site to download Trojan Virus and STEAL your MONEY. www.bloodloveandlustspells.com - SOUNDs like a SCAMM Site - Spells do not work. APEX of Jan Windglows Complaints; Evidence of Internet Stalker Are you also a victim of the APEX of Jan Windglows Complaints; Evidence of Internet Stalker? Submit a complaint to help other consumers to be educated. READ this shared Twitter account of many people that are FED Up with these SCAMMERS - post your Rip-off Experience.twitter.com/JanWindglowSCAM CLICK AND read Spell Casting SCAM (JanWindglowSCAM) on Twitter SCAM Psychic Jan Windglows owns scam spell casting site www.bloodloveandlustspells.com - DO NOT USE! GOD Shall trample the DRAGON !!!! twitter.com/JanWindglowSCAM - Cached Spell Casting SCAM (JanWindglowSCAM) on Twitter July 17, 2010 - SCAM Jan Windglows, CRIMINAL and FUGITIVE of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com COVEN of CRIMINALS!!! DO NOT USE Spell Casting SCAM (JanWindglowSCAM) on Twitter Spell Casting SCAM (JanWindglowSCAM) on Twitter Post your Ripoff of these COVEN of Criminals Call the Police give whereabouts of these Gypsy SCUM wanted for Deception Fraud and 15 yrs of Western Union PayPal Ripoffs DO NOT USE www.bloodloveandlustspells.com


Dragon

Driggs,
Idaho,
USA

Thank You For Your Kind Words Poster, PLEASE SEE CURRENT CRIMINAL RECORDS OF MARY T PRANTIL AKA Honest Person

#31Consumer Comment

Thu, July 08, 2010

Over The last three years plus, we've been harassed and slandered along with other on-line businesses all over the Internet by Mary T. Prantil of Queens County Astoria New York, who further was a disgruntled ex-client of several other magick sites along with other online businesses. Personally speaking, Miss Prantil's case was dropped with us for the sole reasons that she was incapable of following the simplest instructions and moreover repeatedly broke every site policy in existence over and over again without remorse.

Miss Prantil went on to excessively harass everyone in not only her personal situation but those of us who were assisting her through spell casting operations, Spell castings that were working out very well for her in the start that she eventually destroyed via her excessive drug and alcohol abuse.  Of course, let's not leave out her EXTREME and hostile behaviors regarding her personal interactions with those around in her love situation along with those trying to yield her the best advice in co-existing with others in a peaceful manner.

Miss Prantil feels that none of this was her fault and that her CASES shouldn't have been dropped by any of theses sites, moreover had a real problem in accepting any responsibility for anything that she personally carried out against others. I believe her denial of the facts exist to this very day as she's sitting in a new york jail.  Prantil is in fact a habitual, slanderous and highly aggressive liar who thinks nothing about engaging in cyber stalking, telephone and email harassment against others over a prolonged period of three years, etc. 

Miss Prantil has this little con game she likes to play such as committing unlawful acts against someone then accusing them of doing that same thing to her on the Internet and in the courts to play on everyone's sympathy. You can see some instances of this going on in the reports below regarding the lawsuits she's launched against others, and the responses back from the people involved. You can also view several people sueing Mary T. Prantil for either damages resulting from her liable behavior in a auto accident to something to do with real estate, right on down to being sued by G.E. Money Bank for defaulting on her loans etc.

Please click this link of (((Redacted))) to read more revealing activities and evidence on Mary Prantil and you will understand what type of a person this really is, and what she has attempted to do in her efforts to destroy not only our company but other companies as well via using the scam sites as a vehicle for her liable slander. Now, without going into it all this again, I'm just going to refer you to the site link previously provided for you above however, I will address some of her rebuttals in this post regarding Mary Prantil's QUOTES: "My Clean Criminal Record ". " I don't have a criminal record", " I never ripped anyone off ", I've never been arrested for anything etc.

Well, all we have to do is go to the Lilith site to observe the information that proves her statements false beyond a reasonable doubt when in essence Mary T. Prantil DOES HAVE a criminal record and did in fact obtain paid spell services and readings from various sites, or on-line businesses, and went on to have charged back on them, or knowingly wrote out bad checks to these online services. This information shows Miss Prantil carrying this out against these sites from one to six times according to statement your looking at.  You can read about criminal Prantil's attempted extortion, blackmail and other liable statements and ventures she had made against several of us via the Lilith site.

So yes, we have proved that Miss Prantil is a liar, thief, blackmailer, extortionist, cyber stalker, stalker, con artist and scam artist who makes a game out of ripping off both land based and online businesses, whom further slanders them all with totally fictitious charges to exact her revenge, or to simply satisfy her nasty disposition in her own miserable little existence.  Were not just talking one or two posts here but thousands of extremely false, nasty and vile posts all over the place concerning personal names and or businesses.  Miss Prantil takes it up to the next level in mass spamming these posts, bombing her victims email addresses with porn, fills up voice boxes with nasty voice mails on a daily basis etc.

Ok, let's talk about her statement that she has a "clean criminal record."  Firstly, there's no such thing as a clean criminal record unless you've had a criminal record at one time that has been expunged at some point such as Prantil has had done. Either you have a criminal record, or no criminal record, and that's a fact.  Again, perhaps she was speaking in regards to her California criminal records that her twice disbarred father Frank G. Prantil had expunged for her before he died a couple of years ago.

 You can further read about Frank G. Prantil's unethical, or unlawful activities by simply clicking the link at the very bottom of this report under his information, this link will further take you to two or three legal sites and other public forums that go on in explaining the drug abuse, perjury, botching up a homicide case and stealing of $700,000.00 out of his client's safe while they were sitting in jail.

Let's return back to Mary Prantil's repetitive statements that she made over the last three years plus on Rip off Report under one of her many user names, "Honest Person" www.ripoffreports.com  stating that she's never been arrested for anything and moreover how she always defends the truth.  Prantil, has proclaimed herself to be a victim of Ed Magedson and Rip Off Reports; Prantil maintains that she's a victim of cyber stalking and identity theft for the reason that we've posted her criminal records due to her repeated attacks of our sites.

Prantil has stated that she's a victim of phone and email harassment, the victim of computer hacking, victim of credit card fraud, victim of being ripped off by magick sites and other on-line businesses etc, however we've discovered that Prantil is anything but a victim in any of this; moreover that Miss Prantil was in fact, subjecting others to these same illegal activities that she typically spent most of her time accusing others of doing to her as you look over the criminal reports below and reading the (((Redacted)))

We have heard Miss Prantil go and on about aggravated harassment. Again, when looking over Prantil's endless negative postings  on Rip Off Report and her blog pages, however when looking over the reports below you will discover that Miss Prantil is the one being charged and arrested for this particular crime, three times in the last year there in New York along with resisting arrest via the N.Y.P.D. So again, and to re-cap, Miss Prantil has been arrested for three to four counts of aggravated harassment against four separate people along with one charge of resisting arrest.

Miss Prantil has several pending cases and judgments via different Judges that went on to grant several orders of protection to various others against Miss Prantil.  You will also discover a seemingly endless court docket with a very distinguished line up of Judges residing over the many cases Mary Prantil was ordered to attend regarding her unlawful activities against others. Moreover, you will also notice the several contempt of court charges against Prantil for not showing up to some of her hearings and trials concerning mental health evaluation and the restraining orders etc.

You will see where several orders of protection were requested by various others in a effort to guard themselves against Mary Prantil's relentless harassing activities regarding their persons, personal names and businesses.  Notice the restraining orders below, resided over by several Judges ruling against Prantil and for the plaintiff in a number of instances by issuing eleven or twelve temporary orders of protection.  Please notice that Miss Prantil likes to change her legal council often as she has hired and fired four different attorneys over the last five or six months.  You may .see one instance of this in the report below.  Again, please see how Prantil throws up her bankruptcy as a ploy to keep from being sued in a motor vehicle case someone filed against her.

Mary Prantil always seems to be in the court system either being sued or attempting to sue another person for some reason as you can catch a glimpse of in some of the civil information below under Supreme Court - motion detail.  Immediately below, I'd like you to read the description of aggravated harassment, and harassment and know that this is what Mary Prantil has been arrested and charged with, further this is something she has denied over and over again along with our other numerous charges against her.  Notice the charges for harassment are second degree aggravated harassment, by the way.

Notice the criminal counts she has against her for civil contempt, and aggravated harassment and then read her complaining statements disputing these charges on the forum sites. Notice how Prantil attempts to twist and lie her way out of these factual events and how others are allegedly carrying this out against her. You see, we've spent the last three and a half years listening to the nonsense of this idiot regarding all her charges, or allegations against us. Ungrounded charges such as allegedly hacking into her bank account, stealing her identity, credit card fraud, slander etc., etc., etc., and thus were tired of it.

We've spent three years plus in attempting to clean up the negative links that this slanderous criminal has excessively spammed all over the internet in her efforts to harm, or destroy our business, only to find that Prantil posted countless other disingenuous post to replace the ones we've had removed.

She of course re-posted on the old scam sites and went on to find new one that allowed her to post her garbage against us. For three years plus, we have put up with endless hostile calls and emails of a seriously harassing nature from this Prantil person until now. Miss Prantil is currently in jail and needs to remain there to safeguard the general public as far as I'm concerned.

I don't believe that Prantil can spend any more time in denying her deeds as this has shed UNDISPUTABLE proof on all her criminal activities once and for all, thus showing that this person is nothing but a lieing two bit criminal who feels that the world owes her a living. The California criminal records were a little old and vague; however it did nail this criminal Mary Prantil to the wall. This is a current report originating right there in Queens Astoria New York that has a lot more specific and current very up to date information in it regarding Criminal Mary T. Prantil.

Please read over the reports below and don't forget to visit us at (((Redacted))) to get the full story on Mary T. Prantil concerning other evidence we currently possess such as 33 of her abusive voice messages admitting that her spell indeed worked as she states in her own voice, her threats along with transcripts and statements from other business websites that Prantil ripped off. 

See the 66 pages of phone spoofing made by prantil in her hacking attempt into our personal and business phones. View the cross reference links showing her negative postings under numerous posting along with catching her acting like different posters under the same user name. Read all of Mary Prantil's contradictions, inconsistencies and out right blatant lies.  Take a look at her case transcripts along with some nasty emails she sent in to us and much much more. 

This next statement DOES NOT APPLY to Consumer Complaints Board or Consumer Complaints Board in India as we've been treated fairly by them and have the utmost admiration for these sites. Like I said, WE'RE TIRED OF Scammer Criminals like Mary T. Prantil being allowed to post ABSOLUTE GARBAGE about us on the Forum sites, Gripe sites and Scam sites simply because they use Morons like Mary Prantil for sensationalism and rating reasons regarding Google etc.

And so, I would ask these sites to at least START POSTING YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION so victims can contact you for the expressed purposes of requesting that you remove any false postings on them. Please start holding posters responsible for their content your postings in their behalf. Start REQUIRING real user information and validity of statement from posters. Until you do this, your sites will have absoulty no credibility in the public eye.

You may not be held accountable by man's law however, YOU ARE held responsible and accountable by Divinity and it will come back to you. DO THE RIGHT THING by Innocent others and STOP allowing criminals to harm and destroy good people and their businesses, no matter the cost. Read these reports and know that Mary Prantil is on your sites abusing and hurting the innocent out of sheer hate and greed. All this information can be verified through location and the case numbers provided. For latest updates on this situation please click the links directly below.  Jim Morgan

(((Redacted)))

Section 240.26 Harassment in the second degree

 A person is guilty of harassment in the second degree when, with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person:

 1. He or she strikes, shoves, kicks or otherwise subjects such other person to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the same;  or

 2. He or she follows a person in or about a public place or places;  or

 3. He or she engages in a course of conduct or repeatedly commits acts which alarm or seriously annoy such other person and which serve no legitimate purpose.

 Sub-divisions two and three of this section shall not apply to activities regulated by the national labor relations act, as amended, the railway labor act, as amended, or the federal employment labor management act, as amended.

 Harassment in the second degree is a violation.
 

Section 240.30 Aggravated harassment in the second degree.

 A person is guilty of aggravated harassment in the second degree when, with intent to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm another person, he or she:

 1. Either  (a) communicates with a person, anonymously or otherwise by telephone, or by telegraph, mail or any other form of written communication, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm; or  (b) causes a communication to be initiated by mechanical or electronic means or otherwise, with a person, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, or by telegraph, mail or any other form of written communication, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm;  or

 2. Makes a telephone call, whether or not a conversation ensues, with no purpose of legitimate communication;  or

 3. Strikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise subjects another person to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the same because of a belief or perception regarding such person's race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, religion, religious practice, age, disability or sexual orientation, regardless of whether the belief or perception is correct; or

 4. Commits the crime of harassment in the first degree and has previously been convicted of the crime of harassment in the first degree as defined by section 240.25 of this article within the preceding ten years.

 Aggravated harassment in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor.

=================================================================================================================================


Annya

Glendale,
Arizona,
United States of America

RE: Honest Person in PA

#31General Comment

Sun, July 04, 2010

You know, if the Morgans were all these things, why would you continue on with your allegations? Did you try to correct this with Jan or James in an adult or professional manner? Or more so were you just unhappy with the outcome of that too?
I can tell you that I have known of this site for almost five years now, and recently I have become a client of them.
I called Jan several years ago about her doing a service for me, and not in any time of my knowing them, have they once threatened me, told me they were going to curse me, or anything of that nature. I asked Jan about a casting and after our conversation, it was clear that I did not need her services at that time, Jan was nothing but helpful and not disrespectful in anyway that I did not need her, and it was her own advice that helped me see my situation in a better way.
About two years after that I contacted her again, and gee, guess what? the same thing, after a couple lengthy conversations with her, yet again, it was not the time nor the place for her services. She never took any form of offense at me for not using her, NOR did she ever tell me how imperative it was for her to do a spell for me, or my situation would progressively go south.
Only recently have I retained them, and I can tell you, I have probaly not been the best client they have encountered. Alot of this has had to do with MY own misunderstandings, but I will tell you this much, I am not sure who you dealt with/ spoke to/or whatever from their business, but Jan and James both have been NOTHING more than professional, courteous, and helpful to me.
They have answered my phone calls, emails, and everything, and if Jan or James were such terrible people, why would she offer to do a re-cast of the original request I had with her?
If her or James were scam artists, like these claims have stated, why would she bother to do the recasting especially after I have become unemployed due to where I work going out of business, and I was in the middle of making payments to her?  I don't think she would, I think if she was what you claim she would have taken what money she was paid and walked out, and again NOT ONE TIME has she done that to me.
I am pointing this out because the Morgans I know are nothing CLOSE to the people you are describing.
That does not come close to suggesting a scam artist, that sounds more to me like a professional business owner doing what they can to help a client, and to maintain themselves in a PROFESSIONAL manner, regardless of how the client conducts themselves.
Also in the allegations against them claiming that their castings do not work, that is a bunch of crap, again not being one of the easiest people to work with I will tell whoever is reading this out there:
What I requested from Jan and James, has not come to completion, but I have started to see some of my requests work, so tell me how it is, that you can claim they have done nothing for you, when being a CURRENT client, I can tell you I have seen otherwise, and again untill my request is totally complete, I still have seen otherwise.
In this, again, if you were not happy with the Morgans to start with, why did you not try to correct the situation with them directly, and if you did not recieve the response you were looking for, there are many other places out there on the net you could have chosen to use instead, if you did not find resolution, or they have such and evil site or whatever.
More so here is something else to think about, even if you, your friend or whoever was not an easy client to work with, why blame the Morgans in refusing you service if you have slandered and threatened them with all the things you have posted on the internet? Do you have actual proof of all of this from the morgans? Can you give concrete evidence where you were threatened with curses or whatnot? Or were you just so mad with the outcome you thought it would behoove you to just hop online and do what you could to destroy them? I would refuse and or cut off service to you too, if you could not offer proof of your accusations.
So before you have those things, and again jump online because Jan pissed you or whoever off, or James didn't do what he said, have the materials you need to back up your claims, more so be adult enough to go to them directly and clear it with them. They are not unreasonable people in the least.
Again I've known them for some time, and I personally have never ONCE had a problem with them, no matter how much I may have taken their time away from others with questions and the like.
If I've read these claims correctly,didn't Jans services work for you or whoever? Another question to ask yourself, if they did, then why the hell are you still harassing these people? Be happy that you had your request come to completion, and thankful in doing so.


Annya in the Desert.




Dragon

Driggs,
Idaho,
USA

CRIMINAL MARY THERESA PRANTIL'S NEW YORK CRIMINAL RECORDS BELOW

#31Consumer Comment

Sun, July 04, 2010

Update On Mary T. Prantil Of Astoria New York
 
I've waited so long, to both find and post this information on the Forum sites against Miss Prantil. You know, Mary T. Prantil the two bit  Internet CRIMINAL Cyber Stalker, LOL.  You know, the same IDIOT  that just wouldn't go away while the getting was good. Who moreover felt so compiled in getting up on the internet everyday for four years attempting to scam free services out of unsuspecting online businesses and then viciously attacking and SLANDERING them just because they wouldn't let this parasite get away with conning them.  Of course, she would eventually re-scam and slander the ones she did have a chance to rip off as the years unfolded as in the case of the Mike Cahill and prantil incident, of scandal.
 
This report  is a UPDATE to the first report that focused on revealing Prantil's Criminality, or unlawful activities against 11 to 12 people as the record reflects, and another EIGHT people that the record isn't showing at this time.  I think Prantil was accusing us of stalking at one point along with her other lunatic charges such as us allegedly hacking, tax fraud, credit card fraud etc. Get a load of this charge that was just recently launched against Miss Congeniality by the N.Y Court system just yesterday : 120.50 FE (STALKING 3RD DEGREE E Felony.
 
I'm sure you've all ready read our charges against her by now such as PROLONGED Telephone and email harassment, Habitual lieing, Tax Evasion, Extortion, Blackmail etc.  Get a gander of her updated eight different charges on prantil provided below, YES I said 8 different charges that she's currently being held there in NY on until she can go to back to court to explain all her actions to the JUDGE'S.
 
Again, yes, I said Judge's as there are five or six of them all together, Why ? because little Mary has been keeping them all very busy while being brought up on several charges of harassing others around her. Of course, mary leads a very full life without a dull moment and that's why she's been running around on the internet trying to convince everyone else that she wasn't a two bit low life criminal while all this has been going on behind the scenes.
 
Running around while hiding behind one of her 33 fictitious names professing to speak the truth, telling her story in how she was the VICTIM of all those big nasty online magick casting businesses.  Oh help me, help me everyone because I am the victim of being scammed, being hacked, stalked, slandered etc etc etc. Poor Little Mary. Did mary get a bad rap by the New York Court system to ?. I mean, are they lieing as well ?, perhaps their just picking on little scammer mary as well.  Mary likes to hear herself talk when repeatedly saying " I didn't do anything " , " I didn't rip off anyone ", "I don't have a criminal record, blah, blah, blah. And lets not forget go ramblings about how great, or how prestigious the prantil family is LOL.
 
  What was it prantil says on one of her sites ? wasn't it something like " Birds Only Pick At The Best Fruit " LOL, I think in Mary's case it would be Buzzards and Crows as they like their fruit rotten. Mary does remind me of something rotten, maybe not fruit but rotten just the same. Maybe I'm thinking rotten with a side order of pound scum when I think of mary. Of course between bashing Jan and myself Prantil goes on to tell everyone that she's living the American dream and how Madonna is her mentor regarding her seven or eight blog pages. Please keep in mind that this is a 46 year old woman who says this along with her wanting to look like Kate moss lol.
 
One minute she's a hand and hoof model, and in the same breath she's a cooperate executive on wall street. In all reality prantil was nothing but a assistant secretary working for temporary services making a meager wage far from the six figures she had boasted in making earlier on. If you visit her blog sites, you'll see this in her job description.  Basically, she made the coffee, shuffled papers, received calls, greeted people at the front desk and passed messages to folks working in the various offices from time to time. Of course these jobs didn't last as the longest held job may have been a year or a little over before she was fired for misconduct.
 
All in all, this is a far cry from her being a self-proclaimed Corporate Executive for HBO, CNN and Cinimax she ranted and raved about over the last three years. Really when you look over prantil's life,  you can see that she's always lead a menial life with no hopes of ever going anywhere in the cooperate world. Maybe this is why she felt it so important to fabricate, or lie about everything under the sun to make a impression on others, to come off bigger then life. Of course this fantasy, illusion of distorted reality became a way of life for prantil and moreover came in handy when mary started her little slamming campaign against us on the net. Her finally tuned imaginary skills came handy when it came to lashing out at others who rubbed her the wrong way, like us lol.
 
 
It's interesting how Miss Prantil repeatedly states on her blog pages how Jan and myself are guilty of this and that but never seems to come up with any proof to back up any of her pathetic statements or charges against us, especially when given four years to produce anything to back up the smallest statement made. Miss Prantil was taken into custody before she could remove these blog pages just for the record, I also think it's important to explain that prantil never dreamed that her criminal records would be made public record by the courts and thus directly disproving her claims of not having a criminal record of any kind.
 
 When she saw these criminal records posted for the first time I bet the blood just drained down to her feet while she was knocked back with surreal disbelief lol. To be on the net bashing several people and then to see your own criminal activities revealed must be a sobering feeling indeed. Mary also likes to talk about karma and how it's real, well, KARMA is real as she is now finding out. I hope that she thinks of us while sitting in her small little nut cell and how we assisted the DA in putting her there.
 
I certainly hope she thinks of all the people she's ripped off and harassed over the years, she will have plenty of time to think about a lot of things in my opinion, especially about the curse we placed on her and how it will never go away, it will never be broken, it will never fade, it will be there looming over her forever.   Please read her criminal reports and then go check out  these links going to prantil's FANTASY pages. The links are as follows: http://maryprantil.wordpress.com/   http://maryprantilripoffreport.blogspot.com/  http://maryprantilcorrectstherecord.blogspot.com/  http://www.correcttherecord.com/index.php/main_profile/view/53 ..
 
 
Prantil is very direct when repeatedly stating that she has Never been arrested, Never been in jail, Never was committed into a psychiatric ward, Never used or sold drugs, Never ripped off online or land biased businesses, Never used any online spell casting services, Never went bankrupt, Always paid her taxes and on and on.  Ok, well, Miss Prantil is nothing but a lieing CRIMINAL and I'm about to prove it over and over again. 
 
In the previous report you can see where she owes the U.S Government $ 4000.00 in federal tax & $130.00 state or county tax, not only this but this report shows the Tax Warrants out on her. Prantil does in FACT have a civil and criminal record going back 20 years,  back to her childhood in California while growing up under her unethical attorney father that was Disbarred twice for drug abuse, stealing $700,000 and lieing over and over to the court when asked about his shady activities with one or two of his Clients that he became personally involved with. The man seems to have been the lowest low life of the legal community when you read what others in the legal community have to say about him, it's all very involved and likened to a scandalous novel when reading over or through it.
 
As the records show below, Prantil has been arrested several times, then incarcerated as a result for a array of charges ranging from harassment, resisting arrest on to criminal contempt etc.  Mary Prantil has been committed to the state hospital in the past however she vigorously denied this, and then again here recently as you can see when you look her up on the link provided below concerning the RIKERS ISLAND JAIL facility called Rose M. Singer Center. Miss Scammer Prantil will be a guest here in this jail for the next two weeks because their afraid that she will flee justice, as she's done so many times before. 
 
 Prantil has also been Court Ordered to submit to a in-depth psychological exam to determine her sanity and moreover her distinction between right from wrong. Mary's not crazy more so then just a out of control petty criminal who's been caught, as they will all find out at the end of the study. This Simpleton was just picked up on one out of two state Warrants and thus was taken directly to the NUT HOUSE to await the remaining hearings and sentencing that they will ultimately produce against her. seven to eight charges against this five foot and three inch 46 year old woman who starves herself down to a very thin 95 lbs is in a lot of trouble at this point. You would think that by the time you get to this point in your life it would be apparent that it's not prudent to act like a thirteen year old juvenile delinquent.  
 
The police and Courts have just had enough from what I understand and their tired of her games and thus they locked her up tight to be sure she wouldn't RUN, RUN, RUN away from them again, well mary should be happy now as she's finally around people of her own station, birds of a feather flock together in jail.  Further down in this report it states that bail wasn't an option and that the court ordered her right into the hospital for a undetermined time for the mental evaluation.  Again, Mary T. Prantil isn't Crazy even though it would seem so however, she is a two bit manipulating criminal piece of New York TRASH who really knows how to play the system. I wonder how long she can keep up her act for the doctors and courts.
 
 A trick she learned off her UNETHICAL ATTORNEY FATHER I'm sure. Especially, when it came to getting out of drug charges and expunging criminal records in the state of California. Mary says that she doesn't abuse drugs but that not what she told others and ourselves. I mean, doesn't everyone sit up all night long calling, emailing, maliciously harassing and stalking 16 to 20 people a night four over a four year period and for no apparent reason ? WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE ?, WOW the energy that must take on a nightly basis. I have trouble sending out five emails a day for this or that lol.
 
Mary says that she doesn't drink but again, we beg to differ with her lol. Mary says that she never had a spell cast with any service be they online or land based. Again, there are five or six on-line magic sites who beg to differ with this claim coming from prantil as we all have records to show service rendered to her.  Prantil states that she never ripped anyone off, yet there are two or three sites who can show that prantil obtained services and then charged back, or wrote them rubber checks for their trouble. We have several on-line businesses who have been harassed by prantil who moreover kept records and recordings of her twenty to thirty calls a night.
 
Well, Mary can get her head checked out while she waits for judgment day,, maybe she can manipulate her way out of the charges coming down on her. Maybe she can tell the Judge how the whole world is against her and moreover how her voices from God told her to rip off, scam and slander whomever she thought was evil. Perhaps her voices weren't from God after all and just herself talking to herself. You know, this happens a lot when people start coming apart at the seems, especially when nearing the end of their cycle of terror against others.
 
We've read when little Mary started using words like scam, liar and slander while accusing others of these despicable acts yet, she was the perpetrator of all of these low caliber deceptions. Again, we hear little miss innocent proclaiming to the world: "Don't believe Rip Off Reports",  " Ed Magedson is a criminal" yet it was Mary Prantil up on the site of Rip Off Reports under twenty or thirty different user names posting liable speech against the innocent in order to destroy their businesses, Not Ed Magedson.  I don't care for ROR but let's give credit where credit is due. ROR may be guilty of being a opportunist site along with many other forum sites however, I've never seen any of these sites openly carry out against others what prantil has consistently carried out against the innocent.
 
We hear Prantil stating that no one should believe Jan or my reports on the Internet  yet, we have produced endless documentation, or piles of verifiable proof against Prantil regarding police records, police eyewitness accounts, accounts from four other magick site owners in what had transpired when prantil came calling on them for the services they offered and then rendered. We have produced verifiable records, old and current civil and criminal court records along with audio sound files catching prantil admitting that her spell work did in fact work until she messed it all up through her malicious, disruptive, hostile and over all out of control behavior due to the drug and alcohol abuse.
 
Miss Prantil likes to use the word HOAX a lot however, the only hoax here was perpetrated on her end. Again, we hear the words scammer, scam, rip off artist yet, when you look back at all the evidence against this fool you can't help knowing who the real  scammer, fake or con artist is, wouldn't you agree ? I know you do especially when looking over the records below.  Lastly, when reading over her seven or eight blog pages that she currently has up on us,  you will notice her one resounding message being (" DO NOT USE "  DO NOT USE " ).
 
 Yes, this statement has been posted over and over again all over the Internet, posted under her thirty or more User names on about every scam site over the net. Further under about every disingenuous story that you can think of as she's attempted to pass herself off as different people in a effort to both draw sympathy and fool the public. You know, as stupid as it is prantil's reasons were for trying to destroy our business you'd think that she would have just faded away after a while, but as you can see she was still with us four years latter.
 
Basically her reasons for four years of lieing and harassment was because we wouldn't take any s**t from her, nor would we permit her in scamming us out of services. We wouldn't permit her in bossing us around or posting blatant lies about us on the Internet without confronting her with factual proof disputing all her lies for all to see. That's it, that's all it took for this scammer to repeatedly attack us for close to four years. The thing that really angers her is in that we EXPOSE her every time we get a chance, or when we see her attempting to scam private persons or businesses.
 
Miss Prantil said it best when she said " Give them enough rope and they will hang themselves " SHE SHOULD HAVE TAKEN HER OWN ADVICE as she gave everyone the rope to hang her high through her own evil actions against others.  Internet Terrorist Mary T. Prantil will now face real justice in the courts of New York while being made to face up to everything she's ever carried out against anyone, this criminal can get three to five years from what I understand when reading over what she's been technically charged with concerning the  N.Y state codes, let's hope so any way.
 
I hope my faith in the Justice system can be restored once again.  As I've said before, we as a Nation should be protected by our laws and thus people like prantil should be locked away under a deep, cold and dark jail in Siberia somewhere far away from the rest of us.  I feel Mary T. Prantil was someone in search of the American dream but never seem to attain it on any level, and it was then that she decided to take a lesser version of it by force by resorting to the loathsome actions as stealing, conning, lieing and attempting to steal or destroy this same dream that others are so earnestly trying to attain in these despairing times. Again, Marys distorted view of the world and they way things should be carried out in life.
 
It all came down to jealousy, greed and reinventing herself into something that prantil never had any real hope of becoming in reality. She fancies herself as a Comedian but how can you bring laughter to the world when your bringing so much sadness in its place through your own selfish actions ? you can't.  How can the hopeless one bring love, laughter and hope to the world ?, They can't because love, hope and laughter is nonexistent within them and can't give what you have not to give.  
 
Prantil is a person whom feels that the American dream let her down, or left her behind and thus she decided that she should go for broke and attain this dream in any way possible even if it came at the great expense of others, even if it met breaking societal and spiritual rules across the board. In short, site policies, state laws, ethics, good morals or positive standers mean ABSOLUTY nothing to this Individual.  Religion, faith and other principal's are merely things she stands behind when it's convenient for her to do so, or can be used to achieve her goals.
 
Mary Prantil is someone who believes the world owes her a living in the process of achieving what she considered to be the American dream. As I've stated in other post, Miss Prantil sure has a funny way of achieving her dreams and further has very little to total disregard for the rights of others in the process. Many people all over the country have suffered emencly as a direct result of prantil's speech and actions over the last four years and back, Why ? because this person was left unchecked by the legal system for so long not to mentioned her despicable behavior being enabled by her family and others just because they were afraid to step in and do what needed to be done in committing her early on.
 
Well, it looks like it all coming full circle for prantil now, and the crow has finally come home to roost for lack of better words,  I believe that our work has been completed in exposing this sick but criminal personality and there's really nothing more to say other then let this be a lesson to any scammers out there who, like mary, believe that they are above the laws of the land and like to hide behind little fake names on the Internet while attacking the innocent, or ripping off the innocent. Scammers run both ways on the Internet, or can be found in the Client just as well as in a bad company is the lesson for today. 
 
 I will say this to folks out there who like to pick on businesses: Without us you would still be growing your own s**t to eat and making your own clothing to wear, AREN'T YOU HAPPY you have someone to do this for you ? Most Companies and or small businesses AREN'T CRIMINALS so DON'T TREAT US as such.  Have some dam respect, Remember that word ? we have respect for you so be kind to us next time you see a Vender on the street or visit a web site.
 
 I would like to say to everyone else that has had a personal conflict with Mary to rest easy now,  I don't believe this moron will ever be back to hassle any of us ever again, time to release it and get back to our lives, time to enjoy the peace and quiet we once had before this menace of society came knocking at our doors with all her deceptions, trickery and games of scorn. Enjoy the postings exposing this Internet criminal for what she has always been, a ignorant fool. Even though Mary had spells cast for her situation many times over she never believed in them even when they worked in her life.
 
Ok, back to Miss Prantil,  I wonder if she believes in the Curse we cast against her now because she didn't seem to before lol. The spell we cast against prantil in order to stop her madness against the innocent. What was that you said Mary ?, wasn't it something like God shall TRAMPLE the Dragon ? Well mary, someone did get trampled here but it wasn't my beautiful Jan or Dragon self, I think it's safe to say that you were trampled under Divinities foot as evil can't exist in the presence of divine righteousness.
 
Let's hope that the state of New York continues to carry out its duty in the instance of Mary T. Prantil. Perhaps when it's all done, and when the judgments have been all passed,  we as a society can been secure in that our system continues to work. Again, perhaps Mary T. Prantil will be lawfully RESTRAINED and kept away from law abiding citizens until which time she can function normally in society, if ever. If you would like to verify this on going criminal record on Miss Mary T. Prantil then please go to the address link below, be sure to click for updates as this case is still unfolding. If your not into looking up records we understand and thus the easy to access and read Queen Lilith Site is there for you  at www.ashrinetoqueenlilith.net.
 
The Lilith site was constructed out of necessity due to the prolonged cyber attacks we've endured as a direct result of mary prantil attempting to destroy our business over the last four years. On this particular site you can view her entire criminal history along with several sound files catching her in the act of habitually lying, threatening, blackmailing, extortion etc. You will also read through the transcripts and eyewitness accounts along with transcripts of what actually transpired between her and the sites that were foolish enough to take on her cases. 
 
 The entire purposes of this site isn't to defame, embarrass or humiliate prantil however, it is about presenting the facts in a fair and truthful way while defending ourselves against the onslaught of her endless accusations. This is a defense site that were in essence excursing our right to free speech found under the first amendment of the United States Constitution.
 
 
 
http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcrim_attorney/CaseIdentifierSearch?txtCaseNumber=2009NY002655&txtSummonsNumber=&cboCounty=30&pageNumber=1&fromEmail=Y

MARY PRANTIL
NYSID: 03088617J
Age: 46
Sex: Female
Race: White
Height: 5 ft  3 inches
Weight: 95 lbs
Hair Color: Blonde
Eye Color: Green
Nativity: New York
Booking Information Incarceration: 2010-06-14
Book & Case Number: 3471001054
Facility: Rose M. Singer Center
Arrest Date: 2010-06-14
Arrest Number: COURT DIRECT
Next Court Date: 2010-06-30
Projected Release Date:
Actual Release Date:
Discharge Reason:
Bail & Bond: Remanded
Charge Information
Docket: 2010NY022485
Indictment: 00000 0000
Charges: 120.50 FE (STALKING 3RD DEGREE E Felony) 
240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor) 
240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor) 
Docket: 2009NY002655
Indictment: 00000 0000
Charges: 240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor) 
205.30 MA (RESISTING ARREST A Misdemeanor) 
Docket: 2009NY046033
Indictment: 00000 0000
Charges:
240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor) 
240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor) 
215.50 MA (CRIMINAL CONTEMP- 2ND A Misdemeanor) 

 

Ten Jails on Rikers Island
List Part 2

Rose M. Singer Center

Address:
19-19 Hazen St.,
East Elmhurst, N.Y.
11370

Rose M. Singer Center was opened in June 1988 as an 800-bed facility for female detainees and sentenced inmates. http://www.correctionhistory.org/html/chronicl/nycdoc/html/jailst1a.html#RMSC


Mary T. Prantil Is A Scam Artist

Astoria,
New York,
United States of America

Mary Prantil AKA Honest Person Of Astoria New York Is Caught Red Handed In Scams

#31General Comment

Tue, April 27, 2010

Ending Statements
 
Regarding Mary T. Prantil and the forum sites. I believe that we've proven Miss Prantil in being a habitual, compulsive and obsessive liar, or a pathological liar as she believes her own malicious slander that she procures against others on the net etc. We've proven that this person is a scammer, thief, trouble maker, cyber stalker, harasser, con artist, scam artist, spammer, and two bit petty criminal through the provided sound bites and full voice mail recordings,

credible eyewitness statements, emailed statements, web site cross links, 66 pages of telephone spoofing records and so fourth. This person's only intent is in ripping off free services from unsuspecting on-line and land based businesses by charging back via Pay Pal, putting stop payments on checks, and writing bad checks for any services rendered by these companies.
 
We have proven beyond a reasonable doubt, that Miss Prantil scams innocent businesses and further harasses these same companies by posting highly inflammatory, hostile and negative speech about them in a effort to impede their free trade with others etc.  Without re-hashing what you've all read on this site, let me just get to the heart of this matter.  It's only through these scam forums, gripe sites or complaint boards that a person like Mary Prantil is given the tools for destruction against any company or person might offend her in some way.
 
These sites offer a subsequent abuser such as prantil the opportunity to get up on a national forum to spew and direct whatever slanderous, or disingenuous statements she will at whomever she will for whatever reason, while knowing that she can hide behind anonymity under the whistle blowers act, while even abusing the her right to free speech no less.

So, a person like Mary T. Prantil not only has the advantage in making false charges at a company or private person in relative safety from behind her fictitious names, but can also afford to abuse the first amendment of free speech for the sole reason she's not made to stand behind what she says against others.
 
These sites afford Miss Prantil the luxury to verbally attack, or slander others without fear of retribution from the average person, or victim.  Did I say Victim ? Yes, I did imply that when this occurs on air against the innocent then their are victims as a direct result.

 Why ? Because when a cowardly person such as Prantil engages in the activity of slander, blackmail, extortion and harassment on-line against others out of the blue, then they are instantly at a disadvantage in defending themselves against whatever statements are being made against them.
 
In essence, they don't have the option of facing their accuser.  Whenever you get someone like Prantil on the Internet, you must remember that this type of person is nothing but a coward posting her accusations, allegations or false comments in the comfort of her own home from behind a computer while using a fictitious name on a forum sites. Nothing more, nothing less.

This is a person who has no concept of  what truth really consists of, neither does she have a good understanding of why morals, values or standards are needed in a person's life, and thus when a person like this is allowed to interact with others on the I
nternet then problems are certainly in the making. 
 
 The Forum sites give a reckless and vindictive personality like Prantil the freedom to strike out at others with very little, to no regard concerning the damage she introduces into whatever situation she might engage in be it socially or professionally.

 The only thing that drives a person such as Prantil forward is the very nature that consumes her on a daily basis such as her obsessive, compulsive, raging temperament against anything that she conceives or perceives to be a threat to herself, This could be anything.  A word, a deed that was spoken in all innocence, a well meaning action or jester that didn't jive with her perception of the way things should be.
 
In short, Miss Prantil isn't a very intelligent person however, she does have a great love in making up hateful stories against others.  If this were occurring in a particular group of people that she happened to be around socially in a neighborhood such as Astoria, the group would eventually write her off as the "village clown" or the "village dullard" or "simpleton", simply because they have the convenience of seeing, hearing and trapping her in all her false statements. 
 
 On the net, it's a little different story because someone like Prantil can hook up to the Internet and some times come off as making authentic statements, especially when the person she's talking trash about isn't around to defend themselves. This is why Prantil posts all over the place in the hopes that the person she's talking about won't spot her trash talk and respond to it, and thus hoping that her negative statements will harm the person and or their innocent business without them ever knowing it.  
 
Like I stated previously, this type of a person is a uneducated, nasty and cowardly personality who typically never has the courage to face the one their accusing in most instances.  A person like Miss Prantil has to stay hidden because if she ever was made to answer to the charges she's directing at others in a court of law, her ignorance would absolutely destroy her and she would be exposed in a matter of mere minutes. 
 
What drives a person like this on ?  Well, in my opinion, and after knowing this Prantil idiot for three years or better, I would say hatred, greed, ignorance, anger, delusional thought process and just over all living in a fantasy world.  I would also speculate that Mary Prantil is a "man hater" that not only wants to use men for sex, but in supporting her financially as well.  Ok, we all know what kind of personality to stay away from here, so let's move on and talk a little bit more about the forum sites in the following paragraphs below.
 
 Let's start from the top concerning these forum sites. Firstly, most of these sites are built on the grounds that they provide the Consumer with a medium in which any complaint can be lodged by the Consumer against a company or a private person,  without fear of being retaliated against by any party the particular statement is directed against.

This is a noble venture and further operates under the first amendment outlining free speech and the whistle blowers act.  Then something questionable occurs by these same sites in that they invoke a very obscure law to witch protects them from the liability concerning anything someone might post be it true or of a slanderous nature.
 
Again, yet another strange thing occurs when these sites start offering various services to the Consumer  such as taking down any statements be they slanderous or true about a company or individual for a fee, or X amount of dollars. This is a highly questionable practice as it not only undermines free speech with liabilities attached but penalizes the business owner or private person by charging them monies to take a negative statement down about themselves.
 
So, you either have to pay to have the negative statement removed, pushed down on the engines, or you have to hire one of their on site law firms to represent you against the offender in court of law however, they fail to tell you that anything that occurs on the net in the way of a civil matter is very hard to prove, and that most courts aren't erupted to deal with internet matters in most if not all instances.

 Even if you were to win a civil suit and obtain a money judgment for damages you would then have to spend thousands of dollars more in collecting the judgment. Most of these scamming, slandering idiots don't have any financial worth to them to start with and that's why their out starting up bogus lawsuits and slandering businesses to start with.  
 
in short, all you do waste lots of a lot of time and money when you enlist the aid of these additional services found on the forum sites such as lawyers and other firms that want to push your bad links down off the net.

If you pay the site to have the bad links removed, or they agree to take the links down such as Consumer Complaints did for us on four or five occasions, then the offending poster will simply re-post on the company or private person as the sites in question either won't, or can't block the offending poster submitting the false statements. 
 
Again, the policies of some forum sites seem to be in pursuing capitalism more so then Consumer justice as it would appear.  In short, forum sites as a general rule depend on sensationalism and conflict for their very survival, and thus conflict is needed to pull people into the other services offered by the sites to which rarely ever resolves anything.

So, in essence most forum sites are using loop holes found in the United Staten Constitution to capitalize on to which is highly questionable as a matter of ethics, in my opinion, Yes, these sites can be helpful to a extent when used in the correct way however, when you get someone like Mary Prantil who has bad intent towards another because her scams were unsuccessful against them, then the forum sites give her a way to exact her revenge. 
 
Even though a person like prantil abuses the sites policies along with free speech etc, the sites find her activity useful in drawing traffic to them via her spamming countless negative reports, spamming increases their rankings greatly. Another thing that I'd like to make a point on here, most of these sites are Google sponsored web sites, and thus

Google will post any negative link on the search engines about a person immediately, or within a matter of minutes as this gives them better rankings as well. Incidentally, Google blatantly refuses to remove any post proven false or other harmful links while standing behind the first amendment along with many other forum sites like e-Bolger etc.
 
In essence, their exist a mutual relationship between the negative poster, the forum site and the search engines that in part harms businesses more so then prospering them. The sites in question benefit their own financial in take over any business that might be named through the bad postings that the anonymous poster makes against the businesses in question, and that's why these sites aren't a credible sources of information as far as I'm concerned. 
 
 Jan and I have been on the air for a good many years, we have conducted our businesses in a ethical and forthright way with the highest standers of Customer service. We've proven this over and over again through the years, yet we to have become a victim of these forum sites through prantil's activities, that these gripe sites have enabled to various degrees.
 
However, in our case we have taken the time to successfully defend ourselves on the air ways against this idiot prantil's slanderous garbage by proving everything she states, and has stated about us to be false in every way. Moreover, we have given her the opportunity to prove any and all of the statements or charges she's made against us to be as true over the last three years plus, but she has Failed in doing so in every way.
 
Miss Prantil has used deception, fear tactics, blackmail, extortion and other deceptive techniques to elude, or evade the issues of her espouser such as changing text in our posting against her, constant lieing and slandering, stealing user identities, attempting impede trade through actions and speech, making fake web sites on us etc, but none of this has slowed us down and only pushed us that much more to expose her to the public at large.
 
The forum sites have allowed Miss Prantil in stealing identities and User names on their sites to which she went on in creating entire post in the name of the person she was trying to discredit, prantil went on to post fake web sites on Twitter, Face Book, E-Bolger and others in a effort to confuse the public as can be seen all over the net and especially Rip Off Reports and Consumer Complaints etc.

 Especially during the time of my divorce and copyright issue with Mr. Cahill on ROR. One thing I will say in defense of the sites of Rip Off Report and the Consumer Complaints boards, and that is, even though Rip Off Reports didn't remove the trash post that prantil posted, They did in fact block her from making any other post.
 
 The Indian Complaints Board voluntarily removed the negative post on us as they could clearly see what was going on with this prantil scammer, they still do this to date without being ask by ourselves,  this in itself tells me that their a ethical, or decent site.

The American based Complaints Board also saw what was going on and removed several of prantil's trash reports on us as well, they did this numerous times at our request until we just ask that the post remain up to show contradictions in prantil's statements to which they honored. 
 
 I consider this yet another ethical site, however I do still maintain that these particular sites should take stronger steps to block people like prantil from their sites in a effort to protect the innocent from being unjustly attacked by someone with a petty grudge. 

Prantil abuses these sites and uses them to harm other people through by abusing their own policies against them or in just blatantly breaking these same policies.  The forum sites aren't even safe from this moronic idiot who believes she is above any law or site policy etc.
 
  Prantil was solely responsible in creating a lot of the conflict a couple of years back concerning the Rip Off Report conflicts because she was primarily engaged in the stealing of identities, the very thing she's always accusing others of doing to her.  Prantil would create fictitious post under a given persons User name, only to stir a bad situation that much more going on between others.

This was her sole intent or goal after all. It's a matter of public record that Mary T. Prantil hates ALL spell casters, psychic readers etc and further believes that were all Satan, that she is the defender of God and all his holy laws lol. You can also see this in her ROR and Complaints boards postings against us.
 
So, when you read these conflicts on the forum sites concerning Celeste Morgan, Mike Cahill, Stanley M. Cahill, James Morgan, Jim Morgan, Jan Windglows, Janhett Windglows, Janhett T. Windglows, you really don't know who posted what because Miss Prantil was up there copying and pasting everyone's post in sections in a effort to stir

 everyone up that much more under their assumed User names, not leaving out her posting under her Honest Person User and the numerous other postings made under her multitude of other User names,  as can be found on the second page of this site.
 
So you see, Miss Prantil has intent and motive to cause problems between magick sites as she believes them to be evil and that she's Gods Avenger even though she used these magical services over and over again from one site to the next, Does this make her a Hypocrite ?

 ANSWER: Yes. Does this make her a Bible thumping snake cultist with a twisted and severally sick view on Christianity ?, Answer Is: Yes. Is her post and other statements against spell casters, or any other person in the spiritual community credible ?, I would say definitely not.
 
 Is Miss Prantil a good Christian because she's always posting Bible verses ?, Answer Is: Not even by its lowest standards. Is Mary T. Prantil a truthful, forthright or well meaning person that fell victim to a scam operation as she suggest ?, Answer Is: I would say definitely NOT especially in light of all the evidence that has been compiled against her over the last three years plus. Has Miss Prantil excessively slandered and manipulated site owners and private persons for her own self-gain or revenge ?
 
 I would say that this has been proven repeatedly in the provided reports on this site. Moreover, Is Mary T. Prantil a petty criminal ?, their are many that would say yes, especially after looking at her criminal record background search. What about her work history ?, we performed a background search on the testimonials and job history she presents and found that she was either fired or didn't work for theses companies at anytime.
 
To sum all of this up, and to put it out there in total, there's nothing real about Miss Prantil, Not a clean criminal record, Not a outstanding job history, Not a inheritance of two million, Nothing. We did find something to her statement of being a stand up comedian however, she performs in tiny little waffle houses and very small, dank

armature clubs from time to time where she gets paid little to nothing for her trouble. Prantil doesn't work at any other job because she lives off her elderly mother who refuses to give her any extra money as she' afraid that she will spend it on drugs or alcohol according to what Mr. Cahill stated that she directly told him.
 
 So, this person lives off her mother while apparently abusing drugs and ripping off or scamming businesses when she gets low on the money Mom gave her to live on. This is a 46 year old white female who lives of mommy who is around 69 years of age,  who won't work or get along with anyone, who tended to get fired frequently when she did work as a result of her rebellious attitude and this is why she never could stay at a job for any longer then a year.

 Incidentally, Mary T. Prantil worked for companies through temporary services and not directly through any corporate company as she proclaims to have done in the past. Do you really want to believe anything this person says either in private or up on the internet LOL, Your answer should be NO.
 
A lot has occurred since the days of ROR in that we have all resolved our differences and have moved on with our lives, that is everyone but Mary T. Prantil. Still attempting to link all of our sites together, or group us all together, still trying to turn us all against one and the other, still slandering everyone especially the one who stayed with this crazy idiot the longest, and tried to help her the most being Mr. Cahill.
 
You can see Mary bashing not only Cahill along with us but slandering Michael Jenkins and two other people that have lawsuits against Miss Prantil there in New York currently.  My divorce is over and I'm on good terms with my Ex-wife Celeste, I'm on good terms with Mr. Cahill and Mr. Jenkins as everything has been straightened out a long time ago. We found out who was causing all the trouble, or stirring it any way, that would be Crazy Mary.
 
Because prantil has messed with all the post that ever were posted by any of us, because these forum sites are allowing her to run rampant. I would highly recommend that you call any of us through the contact information provided below to clarify any questions or concerns that you may have concerning anything you've read.  It's better to go to the source then getting your information coming from the scam sites on the internet regarding any of us.

Again, there are hundreds of postings about us posted on these scam complaint sites, some are real, but most are fabricated by prantil in her efforts to bring down the magick sites in question.  Don't believe everything you read out there because idiots like criminal mary t. prantil is on the loose and you and you just can't be sure who's writing what. .  
 
Usually if anyone has a problem with any of our sites, they will tend to resolve it with us and not post on the scam sites. Speaking for Jan and myself: We don't have dissatisfied Clients and never have as far as we know.   If you have any questions about any of these sites then please contact the Owners.  Thank you so much for taking the time to read this and please be safe out there when cursing the net. -----Jim Morgan


Dragon

Driggs,
Idaho,
USA

..../Mary-T-Prantil/UTTER-disgrace-to-Corporate-America/Mary-T-Praintil/Shames-The-Constitution-Of-The-United-States-Of-America/Mary-T-Prantil-SMEARS-her-family-name-all-over-the-Internet/

#31Consumer Comment

Mon, January 25, 2010

Mary T. Prantil is a LIAR, computer hacker, liar, stalker, and highly abusive to legitimate businesses that she cannot steal from. At NO time whatsoever did Jan Windglows OR her husband Jim Morgan steal any funding from Mary Prantil. Call 208-714-4348 and I will gladly have you speak to Miss Windglows who will connect you to Pay Pal's manager that has all of Jan's Pay Pal records to prove this. Miss Windglows is an upstanding lady and pays her taxes. She will also be happy to provide the telephone number of her Certified Public Accountant who does her business and personal taxes every year- so Mary Prantil is also not telling the truth about that, either.

I have never seen one person tell so many lies as Mary Prantil has. Mary Prantil is a very unhappy person and blames others for her unhappiness when she is the one that should look in the mirror and see herself for who and what she really is. Mary Prantil is an actual criminal on her way to jail, and she is highly jealous of Miss Windglows and has a hatred for her and Mr. Morgan due to the fact that Mary Prantil had her case dismissed due to her very bad and abusive behavior- so she has been up on forums slandering Miss Windglows and Mr. Morgan ever since because she could not get her way. Mary Prantil is a adult child that has been badly spoiled and is extremely poorly bred.

She has no manners, no respect for herself or anyone else. In other words, Mary Prantil is posing as her uncle, trying to side track everyone who reads these threads from the real truth of what she only attempted to do to Miss Windglows and her outstanding spell casting business of Blood Love And Lust Spells, but that is not working for her so she continues to lie and actually thinks the public believes her. She states "she is a male from Texas" yet the "male" as she states herself to be knows all the contact information for Mary Prantil's relatives, plus this "male" from Texas writes exactly the same things as Mary Prantil writes, in the same fashion.

It is apparent to everyone that Mary Prantil has truly lost her mind but even still continues to lie and try to mis guide the public into believing her outlandish schemes. All I have to say to Mary Prantil is that you are truly pathetic. Every time you get write anything here or on any forum, you are quickly proved WRONG. You do have not nor do you not produce any type of factual information so why should anyone ever believe you? Miss Windglows and Mr. Morgan have and will continue to tell the truth about the sad creature of Mary Prantil, so is in fact a criminal, on her way to jail.

She cannot face the truth nor can she face herself. Miss Prantil does not know the definition of larceny, identy theft, or the like. She is merely a mud slinger with nothing good or decent to say about anyone who does not agree with everything she says or does. Any questions about Mary Prantil's lies simply give Miss Windglows a call and she will be happy to address any questions about any of these threads concerning Mary Prantil and produce actual hard copy records of the check that Mary Prantil wrote to Miss Windglows for her spell services at the time she was a client plus give phone numbers to the NYPD that will attest to Mary Prantil being a criminal that they wish they could lock up and get off the streets and out of society.

Here is another copy and paste of the real truth, just for the record, about Mary Prantil. The reason we continue to post the truth is because criminals such as Mary Prantil do get exposed and we feel the public has a right to know so that in the future any other legitimate and highly reputable business owners do not get scammed by Mary Prantil. MARY T. PRANTIL is up here AS USUAL because she has nothing BETTER to do with herself writing and telling lies again trying to hide your bull crap as always WHAT ELSE IS NEW LOL?? Jan Windglows is NOT a convicted felon nor did she get arrested for larceny because Jan and James are home and happy just call them at 208-714-4348 if anyone wants to call the Idaho State Attorney go ahead because the Idaho State Attorney does not have any charges on Jan OR James...neither does any other state.

Mary your little bull crap of trying to cover up your little fiasco up here is not working, so give your liar mouth a vacation or wash your mouth out with A BIG BAR OF SOAP at least, LOL. How in the WORLD can anyone commint larceny daily on the global Internet, DUH how stupid is that? If Mary T. Prantil does not have a criminal record, then WHY are the case numbers for her criminal records plastered all over the Internet?

Mary has a favorite hobby of filling out FALSE police reports and obtained her "good conduct certificate" by paying twenty dollars at her local police station, but apparently Mary T. Prantil is nothing but a LOSER that does not even know what good conduct IS otherwise she would shut up and stop telling lies about two beautiful innocent people that are happy and successful in their lives. GET OVER YOURSELF, Mary T. Prantil.

The way you are trying to come across like you are Richard Prantil is such a JOKE because everyone can plainly SEE your style of writing which is YOUR writing and how you word what you are saying, and everyone knows it is YOU posting and NOT Richard Prantil. The fact is that Mary T. Prantil is an Internet terrorist, a Internet and telephone stalker, she goes after people that do not take sh_t from her and does not care if she lies about anything and everything as long as she can run her filthy lie filled mouth. There is no larceny charges, Jan was not arrested, she did not rip Mary T. Prantil off, on the contrary Mary T. Prantil BEGGED Jan to resume her case after Mary screwed it up SEVERAL TIMES.

Jan has all the proof Mary T. Prantil has nothing but LIES coming our of her ROTTEN MESSED UP MOUTH. Ya just can't stand being exposed, can ya, Mary? What's the matter? Doesn't anyone reading these posts believe you? NO THEY DO NOT. Richard Prantil is probably ashamed of the way you have slandered the Prantil family name all over the Internet and is laughing at the way you have made a TOTAL a*s out of yourself, just like you do every time you get up on any Internet forums.

NOT WORKING, MARY. If Mary T. Prantil is a successful media executive, then I AM QUEEN ELIZABETH, lol. Call Jan Windglows and she will gladly produce Mary T. Prantil's criminal records, her attempts to scam Pay Pal, and much more incriminating information about CRIMINAL MARY T. PRANTIL. Mary T. Prantil is a real life criminal who will probably get banned from ever using a computer ever again by the time she goes back to court to her trial to face the many charges that are currently against her. GET A LIFE, MARY.

If you are going to continue to be a garbage mouth, go find your local CITY DUMP and vent your lies and unhappiness there. Everyone on the Internet is FINISHED WITH YOU and knows you have been exposed as the liar and criminal you really are. YEAH CALL DETECTIVE CARRANO- HE WILL TELL YOU HOW HE HAS DEALT WITH PSYCHO MARY PRANTIL FOR OVER EIGHT YEARS. CALL THE FBI THE CIA THE STATE ATTORNEY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IN EVERY SINGLE STATE IN THE UNITED STATES OR WHOEVER AND ASK THEM IF THEY HAVE ANY CRIMINAL RECORDS ON JAN WINDGLOWS BECAUSE THEY WILL TELL YOU THEY DO NOT.

Mary T. Prantil is a pathetic LOSER who has lost her battle on the Internet and cannot do anything positive or constructive because she is a criminal and a compulsive liar. She is a REAL IDIOT to get up here and try to pass herself off as her uncle, Richard Prantil LOLOLOLOLOL !!! NOT WORKING, MARY PRANTIL. HAVE YOU EVER NOTICED THAT NOTHING YOU EVER DO WORKS? Why? Because you are nothing but a TROUBLEMAKER, LIAR, CRIMINAL, EXTORTIONIST, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATOR, THAT IS WHY. WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE, MARY PRANTIL.

YOU ARE REALLY AN IGNORANT STUPID OBTUSE WOMAN WHO IS NEVER GOING TO AMOUNT TO SH_t. Jan and James' correct phone number is 208-714-4348 and invite anyone interested in finding out the real truth about these threads to call them and they will continue to provide actual factual proof of Mary T. Prantil being who and what she is- A CRIMINAL, LIAR, EXTORTIONIST, TROUBLEMAKER, CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATOR, etc. In fact, Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan invite anyone who reads these threads to call EVERY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY IN THE UNITED STATES if you want to, LOL and then you can join us in helping Mary T. Prantil finish making a JACK a*s out of herself like she has been doing for the past three years or so, LOL and it just keeps getting WORSE for her because she JUST CAN'T DO LIFE.

This post is
about a true scam artist AND CRIMINAL named Mary T. Prantil, who decided to come up on the Internet one day going on three years ago to obtain spell casting and other on-line services in which she had no intention in paying for at any time. This is about a person that not only stole from legitimate businesses but slandered them over the entire Internet under numerous fictitious names in a effort to ruin their businesses after she was through using and scamming them.

This report is on a true criminal who hides behind religion and the Constitution Of the United States while proclaiming herself to be a patriot, comedian, and spiritual woman who believes in God, while accusing everyone of doing the very things that she is carrying out in the shadows against the innocent privately. This report is about a scam artist that doesn't appear to have any set ethical standards, values or morals whom is to cowardly to even make her outlandish and fictitious charges against others under her true name for fear of legal retribution.

She's a cowardly, shallow, ignorant individual who is conflicting by nature that thinks she can play with the lives of people wherever she meets them. Her conflicts and arguments are full of lies, inconsistencies and contradictions steaming from her delusional mind set who's further been fired from about every job she has ever worked. This person is a attention seeker, self-mutilator, compulsive, obsessive, habitual liar that can't get along with anyone privately or in the work place.

This can be proven with her long track record found in public records, background search and employment history. Mary T. Prantil is currently attempting to group and slam several independent magic sites and other private persons who have absolutely nothing to do with each other because these same sites and persons are exposing her for her fraudulent activity against them at various times. So, when going over the gripe sites please recognize that any negative statements or post made against us are more then likely coming from this out of control moron of Mary T.Prantil who thinks she's making some sort of case against us without ever producing one shred of evidence to support her numerous fictitious claims.

Who fails repeatedly in proving our charges against her as being false. Let's review one of Miss Prantil's web sites, more specifically her site of ( "SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT" ) found at (((Redacted))), to further establish her personal CREDIBILITY and REPUTATION since these issues seems to be of great importance to her currently. Let's also recognize her statement of not believing anything that is posted on Rip Off Report as she repetitively stated over and over on her site in question. Miss Prantil states, and I quote ( "Mary Prantil CORRECTS THE RECORD and tells the true story about Ripoff Report.com! Mary Prantil Defends the truth - DO NOT BELIEVE RIP-OFF REPORT.com" ), Again a quote from Prantil, ( "Hello...This is Mary Prantil. Credibility is everything !! Protect your Internet Reputation!! "). Well, well, for a person that goes around bashing legitimate businesses, and further the good personal names of other private individuals both on and off the Internet, she sure likes to fall back on this little song and dance of truth and protecting your reputation, doesn't she ?

Especially when it's Prantil herself that is, and has engaged in this sort of attacks against others with hostile gossip, slanderous and lieing activity against others on the Internet over the last three years as can be proven on the site of Rip Off Reports and numerous other forum sites. Prantil states, and I quote: ("I have been the victim of Identity Theft as a result of a 3 year Internet Hoax on Rip-off Report.com, . After I randomly bought a Psychic Reading On-line.") One little Psychic Reading, she says?

Who might this Psychic be that she's talking about on her site that is propagating this "hoax" against her ? I wonder if she, meaning Prantil could be more specific regarding this statement found on her site so that the Psychic in question could either substantiate or deny her statement and charges coming from Prantil. Perhaps she can provide tangible, detailed legitimate hard copy proof that proves that she has been ripped off or that she doesn't have ANY criminal records over the last eight years either in California or New York, or hasn't been engaged in any court action or other legal activity brought against her by others over the last eight years in either the state of New York or in California contrary to what public records indicate in both California and New York.

 

Again, perhaps she can prove that she doesn't abuse or sell drugs from her apartment in tangible legitimate hard copy record, or report from the District Attorney's Office. Maybe she can post this information for all of us up here in a effort to clear her name.

Here's a post from a brave young man who is also tired of Miss Prantil's games, whom moreover validates the claims that she is a Wh_ore, drug abuser and dope pusher. Now, you have to give this man credit where credit is due as he has even posted his picture on this site under his report. Please lets see what this person has to say about Prantil and her postings on ROR, also we would like to give a BIG THANK YOU to this upstanding individual for stepping forward and telling us what he knows of his personal interactions with Miss Mary T. Prantil. Please read the following paragraphs on the site of :(((Redacted)))" Blood Love and Lust Spells, I came here to speak about Mary, Who Mary Prantil really is. I used to live next door to her Mary T. Prantil lies telling the public she is a MALE from Houston Texas but let me tell you who Mary T. Prantil REALLY is. Mary T. Prantil is a strung out drug addict and a sex addict who goes crazy when she does not have a man between her legs having sex with her twenty four hours a day, seven days a week. Mary T. Prantil is a FAT SLOPPY w***e who weighs about 200 pounds who pops pills and drinks like a fish all day and all night- how do I know? I used to party with her. She DOES keep illegal drugs hidden in her apartment and even sells them at her drug parties passing out free drugs to guys she wants to get into bed with her. She is cheap, A SL_T and I consider Mary Prantil the typical New York crack head/wh_re/prostitute and feel she would be happy if she were in porn instead of working in corporate America like she says all the time.

At least she could have sex whenever she wanted it. Which is about every five minutes. She habitually uses crack cocaine, marijuana, LSD, crank, speed, angel dust, she drinks and drives and is a ROAD RAGE MANIAC who places herself and others in danger constantly with her evil and malicious behavior. I cannot tell you how many times she has been in trouble with the cops.Her parties usually go into sex parties because Mary is always looking for a man and uses her parties as an excuse to get a man into her bed. If she has a man to give her sex, she latches on to him like a black widow spider thirsty to drink his blood and feed on him day and night with her sex addictions until he is sucked dry. Then she is finished with him and throws another party to get herself another man. ( or MEN I have known her to have SEVERAL all at one time) when some of my friends and I went to one of Mary Prantil's parties as soon as we were all like passed out she got into our wallets and took all of our money.

Two of my friends sued the crap out of her after that. Mary Prantil has a one track mind which is SUCK and FU_K some guy and take all the drugs she can get her hands on. If she cant, she goes BONKERS! Which is why she is all over these forums. I know her ex boyfriend and the last time I talked to him he told me he was always trying to get away from her because all she wanted was sex and drugs.

That is all she cared about. Something else about her is that she is in trouble for illegal drug possession, drug dealing, check forgery, check kiting, fraud, disturbing the public peace, tax evasion, and a few other things too many to name. Fact is the woman really is a criminal in every respect. The best thing to do is not even talk to her. She doesn't really have any friends because she is too fake and too crazy to be real to anyone which is why she hides and cannot show her real name.

I have an IP tracer and have traced all the reports here and on rip off which show her apartment address for all the mean posts she keeps making on several people and business owners too. Go away, Miss s**t Mary. Everyone knows that you are not worth a sh_t and neither was your late dad. Why don't you do something nice for yourself and move to another country? YOU ARE BUSTED EVERYONE KNOWS IT"

Ok, great, now let's move back to the topics at hand. I quote Prantil in saying : ("The Psychic Scam Artist posted all these falsehoods on Ripoff Report.com in retaliation because I could not be scammed for thousands of dollars for love spells and more Psychic Readings. I did not buy a spell or put a spell on my lover or any person/lover I know. I am not into spell casting.")THIS IS A SET OF LIES BY PRANTIL AS IT HAS BEEN PROVEN AS FACT THAT SHE DID CONTRACT SPELL WORK AND MULTIPLE READINGS FROM SEVERAL MAGICK SITES AND READERS." Ok, fair enough to Miss Prantil and we will take your statements at face value for now, however, can Prantil explain to us how and why four separate spell casters that she claims NOT to know possess legitimate hard copy records of having casted spells for her through their companies?

That moreover possess ALL legitimate proof of payment of her spell castings, proof of payment or partial payment or no payment for psychic reading/s and spell castings, Prantil's business voice messages and emails back and fourth between these companies and herself throughout the course of her cases, and over the last three years; not leaving out other legitimate and tangible evidence that links her directly to them as a client ? Quote from Miss Prantil : ( "I paid for my Psychic Reading, I did not rip off anyone as the Gypsy Scam Psychic falsely posts about me, Mary Prantil on Ripoff Report.com.

I got ripped off by the Gypsy Scam Psychic. I asked for my money back instead of getting my refund the Scam Psychic began posting falsehoods about me on Ripoff Report.com. DO NOT BELIEVE POSTS on Rip-off Report.com about me, Mary Prantil. Rip-off Report.com is not a legitimate site and only writes propaganda for dishonest merchants.") DIDN'T RIP OFF ANYONE ? ???, I THINK THE INFORMATION BELOW WILL SPEAK OTHERWISE and for itself. What about Mr. Cahill's and Celeste reports against Prantil that the Viewer can read down further in this report, I think there's a matter of $ 2,100.00 owed by Prantil that she's telling Cahill that she can't, and won't pay him for the services he rendered. If there's any question about this then give Mr. Cahill a call at (((Redacted))) write him at (((Redacted))), his site is (((Redacted)))
.

I guess everyone is entitled to their own opinions concerning ROR, However it is also a matter of record concerning Ed Magedson and his site of ROR in that Prantil has written several testimonials into him personally via email, and then thanked him publicly on the site of ROR on her posts. Perhaps Ed would like to post Mary Prantil's testimonials so everyone can read over them. I believe there's a conflict of statement here on Miss Prantil's part as she is PRAISING Ed Magedson on ROR one minute and then seemingly bashing him on all over the place on her own little dumpy web site when her scamming fiasco turned against and backfired on her. This can be seen on the following link of www.correcttherecord.com/main_profile/view/53. Also, you can see where Prantil is thanking Ed on ROR while calling us, meaning Jan Windglows and James Morgan "GYPSY SCUM" in her posts. We also have this specific language coming from Prantil in emails, recorded messages and other mediums such as messengers along with 66 pages of our phone records.

There are four different sites out here in whom Prantil has contracted for spell work and readings, who further have her posted ror statements probatum in numerous email communications and recorded messages not to mention online account information showing her scam activity through Pay Pal.Here are the links Prantil posted on ROR under countless fictitious names thanking Ed Magedson, and calling us "Gypsy Scum": http://www.ripoffreport.com/fortune-tellers/mary-prantil/mary-prantil-mary-praintil-jam-939g7.htm. Quote:from Prantil under one of her many fake names ("THANK YOU ED MAGEDSON FOR PROVIDING ACTUAL EVIDENCE OF JAN WINDGLOWS-JIM MORGAN-MIKE CAHILL - WHO ARE BOTTOM FEEDERS-CRIMINALS ANS TRULY SICK DEMENTED INDIVIDUALS THAT ARE NOTHING ABOUT GOD OR ANGELS !!! ":) http://www.ripoffreport.com/con-artists/mary-prantil/mary-prantil-wanna-be-stand-up-e68fa.htm.

I wonder who Mary T. Prantil is specifically accusing in the way of attempting to steal $5000.00, then $7,500 and eventually $ 50,000 from her ? No one shows any record of these amounts in question regarding the sites that did perform work for her, perhaps Mary T. Prantil would like to humor us all by yielding the actual legitimate hard copy record of this actually transpiring, or allegedly occurring between her and a spell caster or reader in question. Maybe Prantil can scan her evidence of this and post it on all the forum sites so everyone can see it instead of running off at the mouth with her half baked accusations without actually providing any type of legitimate documented hard copy PROOF.

Maybe she would like to name these alleged offenders on her own personal web site. If the informational is factual then she has nothing to worry about legally; however if not, then she's got plenty to worry about in the way of unending legal repercussions against her for slander. Other posts that can be linked to Mary Prantil on ROR are as follows : (((Redacted)))blood-love-and-lust-spells-c283109/page/1.html#c525350. Observe the language and phrasing of her sentences and the content of the statements themselves and you'll see this is the same person talking this junk. In Prantil's ROR reports, and aside from all her rantings and ravings against Jan, myself and others, SHE CAN'T PROVE ANYTHING to anyone other then the fact that she's being a STUPID half witted attention seeking moron with criminal tendencies, who apparently learned her ignorant criminal behavior from her unethical attorney father Frank G. Prantil.

It's all so irrelevant, when she talks to everyone about her dirty criminal father and how much property he acquired as a result of ripping people off throughout his career, her statements have no bearing regarding this case or what she has personally carried out against others. It doesn't matter how many names she chooses to SHAME by posting the names of her mother, father, sister, uncle or dad's ex business partners. WERE NOT IMPRESSED OR AFRAID, Miss Prantil.

 It doesn't matter how many outlandish things she chooses to say about others without a trace of proof, or all the little names she calls others. All her mud slinging is hitting her right back in her UGLY face. What matters is the proof you present to which we have posted below and the proof Prantil fails to produce. This is real proof and can be verified through legitimate hard copy records that moreover hasn't been changed in any way. Prantil's emails haven't been altered either no more then her nasty voice messages she left on countless occasions.

It really doesn't matter when Mary Prantil tells us about her alleged "college degree" or how she ran to the bed side of her dieing father, or how she was late in getting there because she was tied up doing other more important things like smoking crack or getting herself into some other trouble elsewhere, in our opinion. What matters, is what she has carried out against others over the last three years and the proof that many people have of her unlawful activities, these are the relative facts. So, I guess Miss Prantil can just stop attempting to obtain sympathy from others off the net by singing this little sad story/song and dance of hers. She can stop acting all patriotic with her little 911 poem and the "god bless America" thing because no one is buying into it. WHAT A HYPOCRITE. Prantil is the biggest abuser of the United States Constitution that I've ever seen. Mary T. Prantil abuses the first amendment covering free speech and the privacy of others.

She uses law enforcement along with other agencies to harass others by fling false police reports against them. Prantil abuses the Internet by posting junk on anyone who has offended her to which includes everyone under the whistle blowers act giving her anonymity. This is a worthless piece of flesh that sits up all night just to prank and harass others because they wouldn't let her rip them off. What about all the businesses she's ripped off because she torments them until she gets something for free?

She sounds just like her worthless daddy in all her conning and greedy ways. What's patriotic about attempting to harm business in a shit_y economy for no good reason other then her own scamming greed? Please Prantil, don't talk to us about the constitution, truth and protecting your so called "good name" as your name is anything but good and your motives are evil, wicked, and abusive in every way. Your rampage against others for no good reason is over and you are the one WHO HAS BEEN EXPOSED for who and what you are, A TWO BIT PIECE OF CRIMINAL GUTTER TRASH.

If anything you are a ENEMY of this country and everything it stands for as you abuse any law that you can use for your own self-gain. Like I said, your comedy thing SUCKS and should be illegal. Is it any wonder why they threw you out of the comedy club? Couldn't cut it, huh? I guess your not as funny as you thought. Why don't you go perform your act over in the middle east some place to see if you can raise a few laughs there ? I'm sure they would find something to do with you quickly as their justice system isn't as bogged down as ours.

Now, I like this one. Quoting Prantil : (" So I went to the police for help. It was here I learned of the Communication Decency Act of 1996 that protects web-owners like Ed Magedson. Truly, we are at the mercy of web-owner like Ed Magedson that allow a false forum. ") Hey Prantil DUMMY....... This law is to protect web site owners from scum buckets like you who violate the site policies in the way of posting false statements about others on a forum site like ROR. Why should a site owner take the heat for some lieing piece of human trash like Mary T. Prantil ? Why should a site like ROR be closed down just because some low life like prantil wants to abuse it like she abuses everything else in her life? YES, PRANTIL, THIS PROTECTS SITE OWNERS FROM PEOPLE LIKE YOU who don't have enough good sense to be civil in a civilized society.

Ed isn't going to vouch for you and post your lying statements as truth on his site, you DUMB A_S. Miss Prantil didn't mind too much when this site was posting all her trash up here in the beginning of the Cahill conflict under her fictitious name of "HONEST PERSON" when she had allies. What's wrong Prantil ? Don't you like all the good people on the Internet being warned about you ? SCAMS LIKE TO STAY HIDDEN IN THE SHADOWS SO THEY CAN GO FROM PERSON TO PERSON or business to business, however when light is shed on the scam artist like Prantil, then others become aware and STOP THE SCAM CRIMINAL IN HER TRACKS before she can scam again. Maybe this is why scam criminal Prantil has been trying so hard to cover our posts with her endless postings of s**t and endless lies.

Maybe Prantil doesn't want others to be turned on to her Fu_ked up scamming games. Prantil likes to accuse ROR and Ed Magedson of spreading propaganda about her, but there again, IT'S PRANTIL THAT'S TALKING TRASH ABOUT OTHERS and not Ed Magedson. Isn't it true that ROR has a no spamming policy now that prevents a person like prantil from filing 8 to 10 rebuttals all saying the same garbage ? Isn't it true that every time a person makes a post that they have to check a box declaring that their statements are true ? I guess this is why Prantil's posts aren't so numerous on this site in particular.Congratulations, Ed for a job well done.

Quote from Prantil: ("The Scam Artist Psychic posted these falsehood on over 7 different web sites about 3 yrs ago:a couple of porn sites, dating sites and Ripoff Report.com. So I went to the police for help. It was here I learned of the Communication Decency Act of 1996 that protects web-owners like Ed Magedson. Truly, we are at the mercy of web-owner like Ed Magedson that allow a false forum.

So at the instruction of the FBI - I sent all web-owners proof of my Clean Criminal Record to show that I was telling the truth. The good news is that All 7 web owners respected the seriousness of my request to remove the false postings and instantly took off the false postings - except Ed Magedson. To this day Ed Magedson refuses all my request to please remove my name, address, and all falsehoods about me, Mary Prantil. So for over 3 years Ed Magedson hosts propaganda about me, Mary Prantil on his site Ripoff Report.com." ) Fact: the F.B.I doesn't involve themselves in low level matters such as postings on the Internet. Fact : they WILL NOT send anyone a record of anything unless another federal agency requests it such as the Department Of Justice.

This is yet ANOTHER LIE on Mary Prantil's part and over all deception against the public. Perhaps she could scan us all a copy of this report and post it on her web site or up here on ROR. IT'S FUNNY THAT PRANTIL COMES UP WITH THE NUMBER SEVEN AS THIS WAS THE NUMBER OF FAKE WEB SITES SHE MADE AGAINST ANOTHER INNOCENT PERSON in order to discredit him and attempt to ruin his business. It was yet another friend of the victim person that went to these web sites created by Mary Prantil who had this information removed by speaking to the web owners. LIAR, LIAR, LIAR---- Prantil distorting the facts again. Of course this can be proven as well with hard legitimate factual proof as well.

You know, I'd love to post a lot of other stuff up here in this report regarding Prantil, but that's for another day. All I can say is you'd better win your court cases Prantil, or your going down BAD, both in the courts and on the net. Keep running and telling lies, you Fuc_ing criminal, because your time is getting short. QUOTE:( "I, Mary Prantil, am the Victim of Identity Theft and what I see as an Internet Hoax on Rip-off Report.com. All Rip-off Reports.com posts are false posted by a Psychic claiming that I am a Rip off Scam artist and into spell casting.

THE TRUTH: I have a clean Criminal Record. I did not Rip-off anyone. I was ripped off by this Psychic. ") . Well, Prantil, and firstly, there are a lot of people on and off the net who you've ripped off or harassed; however let's stay with the issues at hand. YOU DID RIP OFF MR. CAHILL of "Magic Angel Spells" as he can prove with hard copy evidence, you did attempt to scam us which we can prove and have proven to the police, you did rip off some psychic readers which they proved through records being Pay Pal. You, Mary Prantil have harassed others endlessly both on the net and off that is a matter for the courts presently regarding your actions.

NO ONE IS STEALING YOUR IDENTITY, NOR ARE THEY HARASSING YOU UNNECESSARILY; however we aren't going to take your crap and we will show everyone exactly who, and what you are being a SCAM ARTIST CRIMINAL. FACT: No one ripped you off, but you rip others off. FACT: You HAVE CRIMINAL RECORDS AND OTHER LEGAL ACTIONS PENDING AGAINST YOU currently in the state of New York. ( Don't lie to everyone, Bi_ch. ) FACT : YOU MARY PRANTIL ARE THE HACKER, STALKER, HABITUAL LIAR and SCAM ARTIST here and not us and we can prove this with the little virus, Trojan you just sent us that didn't work.

Yes, we found you attempting to get into our computers and trying to acquire credit card information, trying to acquire the private information of Michael Jenkins etc, CRIMINAL HYPOCRITE. We all hope they put you away soon, Mary Prantil Internet Terrorist. You should be humiliated, Prantil, and yes, we do live in funny times, however this is no joke and your a SCAM ARTIST CRIMINAL, a true Internet terrorist.

Please don't talk to us about slander or defamation on the net and how others can say whatever the want against others as you are the QUEEN of slander and defamation. It's only a matter of time before your karma comes full circle for you, MONKEY GIRL. Ok, everyone, please read the information below, and if you have any questions or would like the proof of our statements then just contacts us and we will turn it over to you so you won't be scammed by this idiot Mary T.Prantil.

Mary T. Prantil Caught Slamming & Scamming Let us begin by viewing Miss Prantil's sites that go on in explaining how she has never and at any time ever had a spell cast in her and that some gypsy scum reader, as she likes to call us, or clairvoyant had tried to rip her off for $ 5000. When I personally read over her sites it's really hard for me to stomach this boloney for more then five minutes as I know the real truth about this person. After reading some of her so-called "STELLAR REVIEWS", fake resume and questionable character references on these questionable sites please come back to this report.

Now that your back and laughing really hard to the point of tears, I'd like you to read the following statements below from another spell caster being Mr. Cahill of magic angel spells whom actually performed work for prantil at one time in the recent past. The same Spell Casting site in whom Miss Prantil attempted to have curses cast on Jan and myself for allegedly ripping her off according to Mr. Cahill. Please see where Miss Prantil became very angry with Mr. Cahill for not assisting her in cursing us, Again, according to Mr. Cahill, then see where Miss Prantil contacted my Ex-wife, Miss Schaub after Mr. Cahill apparently dropped Prantil for charging back on him a couple of times for services he rendered to Miss Prantil.

Again read the statements Celeste Schaub is making concerning her encounter with Prantil in the way that Prantil is asking her to throw curses on not only us in this instance but Mr. Cahill as well for dropping her case. Look up the information below if you like as it's all factual and can be confirmed by Mr. Cahill himself or Pay Pal. I believe Mr. Cahill would welcome your questions at this point regarding this matter as he's tired of Prantil's games along with my Ex, or being pulled up in the games of Miss Prantil regarding ror and prantil other statements on air found on many other gripe sites.

In other words, Prantil is saying one thing to folks and doing another thing in private, stating something completely opposite to factual information and truth on the net and carrying out slanderous and harassing deeds in private. Miss Prantil's constant or repeated claims that she was ripped off from various spell sites from behind her numerous fictitious names on ror is in all actually the exact opposite of what had occurred with prantil in real life and this is proven in this post and in other verifiable documentation.

It was Miss Prantil that was carrying out the con games, or rip offs against these magick sites and not the sites ripping her off, WOW, isn't this a eye opener ? Her pages on her site should be: Mary T. Prantil The Stellar Rip Off Artist lol. So, what I'd like to ask Prantil would be : You say that you were never ripped off on your sites and that you alone prevented this, correct ?

Yet state the opposite thing by saying that you were in all your belligerent postings and direct telephone calls and nasty emails to not just one, but all of us. We all have all the emails and voice recordings over a three or four year span of time pertaining to these nasty communications. We also have Prantil's statements that not only did she trust us, but was extremely happy with her services from ALL OF US. Prantil, how can you state otherwise on your sites by saying that you never had, or engaged in any type of black magic spell castings against anyone, how do you explain these hard copy records below ? not to mention the current ones we hold on you ?.

Wow, there seems to be a little discrepancy in your statements, wouldn't you agree ?. In short your telling people one thing on your sites but we can prove otherwise and thus showing that your a liar. So, which is it Miss Prantil ? did you get ripped off ? or did you escape the clutches of some nasty Psychic as you go on about on your sites ?. We have recording of Miss Prantil calling us gypsy scum that correlate with her postings on Rip Off Reports not to mention her calling us scams and con artist. Are you lying Prantil ? or did you have spell work performed in your behalf ? What about Your claim of Identity theft ?, who would want your identity ? I wouldn't.

What is your basis for the claim of identity theft ? would that be you actually signing contracts and making deals for black magic spells to dominate someone else's mind to your own needs ? Well, we have your records and can prove all your dealings with us. You rail on Rip Off Reports while stating that any one can say whatever they want, and that Ed Magedson is a criminal, Well you should know Prantil as you've been up there posting enough s**t on innocent people.

Don't bother answering any of these questions above Miss Prantil, as it is hugely apparent to everyone at this point in what your really doing up here not to mention what you've carried out to innocent businesses along the way in the past and recent past. You attempted to rip off one site and was successful in ripping off another magic site along with a another unrelated Tarot Reader that I know of so far, and this is setting the record straight by confirming it with proof.

Everyone can see how you've jumped from one site or business to another while trying to get them to cast negative spells on another including death spells, love spells and sexual spells. We can see all your begging and threats to slander us along with you actually carrying these threats out with your obvious postings on ror and other sites, We can see how poorly you lie. We can see quite clearly in how you've played these sites against one and the other in the past. It's now quite evident that your nothing but a really nasty, two bit scam artist who is pis_ed off because you've been EXPOSED for your scams that everyone moreover sees you for what you are and knows what you've doing little miss self-proclaimed NY stand up comic from corporate America Whanna BEEE.

You know, we all have pages and pages of phone records and harassing phone voice messages connecting you to us through your threats, we have canceled checks from you not leaving out charge backs in various pay pal accounts and attempted charge backs. We have you on tape threatening to turn in every one of us to this state of federal agencies with false allegations, charges or police reports. You know we do prantil, Don't you ?. It seems to me that you were telling us at one point in your postings how much Mr. Cahill had helped you along with the communications we've shown to everyone where your making this same positive statement about Jan and myself. So why are you posting s**t on us now ?

Why are you trying to connect us to each other in your post when you know were separate rival sites, and or competitors ? sounds like some more slamming and scamming going on here on your end, HUH Mary ?. Miss Prantil yells the loudest about being scammed, yet she is the biggest scam artist in the world and on the net, Miss Prantil talks about FRAUD yet it's on record regarding her attempted and actual credit card fraud through Pay Pal to my understanding.

Miss Prantil brags about how she can acquire services or items, only to use them and return these items back to the store on a regular basis. Moreover how she obtains services from on-line business only to harass and threaten this same business in question until they refund her money back just to get rid of her. What does this make Mary T. Prantil ? Let me answer this for you : She is a petty two bit CRIMINAL, Thief, scam artist of the worst kind and a habitual lire to boot.

Please read the Cahill and Schaub information below, Again, call them and inquire about this posted information and I believe that they will address your questions in a forthright and honest way.CATCHING A LIAR & THEIF IN THE ACT Called Mary----------- "SO I, MARY PRANTIL, AM TELLING MY STORY TO CORRECT THE RECORD!" (((Redacted))) My Story: About 3 years ago (Oct 2006) my Father died of cancer and to deal with it, I foolishly went to a Psychic for a Psychic Reading who wanted to also scam me for thousands of dollars by encouraging me to buy Psychic Love Spells. It was this Scam Artist Psychic that retaliated when they realized I could not be scammed for thousands of dollars. So for over 3 years now, the Scam Artist Psychic posted all the false claims about me on Rip-off Report.com.

I originally went to the Psychic because I was very devastated by my Dad's untimely death. It's not a crime to go to a Psychic or even buy a Psychic Reading. I did not Rip-off anyone. I asked the Psychic for my money back when I realized my mistake. So the Scam Artist and "so called Psychic" retaliated by posting all of these false claims on Ripoff Report.com for over 3 years without my permission. Clearly, the Scam Psychic has no life or real business with legitimate clients to continue for 3 years to post more false claims with no contact from me. 3 years ago, I asked the Scam Artist Psychic for a refund for a pathetic Psychic Reading where I was not satisfied and made it clear I felt I was ripped off.

And I stated to the scam Psychic that I did not want to purchase any future Psychic Readings or any spells whatsoever. I wanted my money back for the Psychic Reading. It's not a crime to get a Psychic Reading. The only thing I was guilty of was being foolish to ever contact this Psychic. I believe in God and I now realize it was wrong to go to this Psychic. I learned my lesson to rely on my faith and not get Psychic Readings from Scam Artist on-line who prey on vulnerable innocent people. But again - getting a Psychic Reading is not a crime. In retrospect, I was really missing my Dad. I made a mistake to ever purchase a Psychic Reading on-line but it is not a crime.

Over 3 years ago, I asked Ed Magedson to remove the false information about me from Ripoff Report.com and he refuses. I even scanned and sent him my Clean Criminal Record. Therefore, Ed Magedson is the real Criminal and Ripoff King not to be taken seriously. Mary T. Prantil's BOGUS Web Sites: ( PRANTIL'S COVER UP STORY... BAD MOUTHING ED MAGEDSON OF ROR (((Redacted)))

(PRANTIL'S EMPLOYER AND PREVIOUS EMPLOYERS ) http://www.linkedin-ech3.com/pub/mary-prantil/a/632/591

( PRANTIL'S LIES TO COVER UP THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT WHO SHE IS ) http://maryprantil.wordpress.com/2009/04/16/mary-prantil-defends-truth-victim-of-ripoff-reportcom/

( MARY PRANTIL'S BLOG PAGE ) http://www.blogger.com/profile/02680327863556078460 (REPUTATION "FAULTLESS" http://maryprantil.blogspot.com/

(NEWSPAPER AND CO WORKERS ON JIGSAW ) http://www.jigsaw.com/Mich_Pran_Davi_Prar/contact_information.xhtml http://www.jigsaw.com/scid7472092/mary_prantil.xhtml

Mike Cahill & Celeste Schaub Tells All, How To Catch A Theif Named Mary T. Prantil ----- Original Message ----- From: service@paypal.com To: archer926@msn.com Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 11:15 AM Subject: PayPal: Initial Inquiry: Case ID - PP-467-553-217 Dear stanley cahill, We recently received a complaint regarding merchandise that was never received or received significantly not as described.

The details of this transaction are as follows: Buyer's Name: Mary Prantil Buyer's Email: prant99@aol.com Buyer's Transaction ID: 6E967396TD6877542 Transaction Date: Sep 6, 2007 Transaction Amount: -$1, 500.00 USD Your Transaction ID: 6E967396TD6877542 Case Number: PP-467-553-217 Seller's Transaction ID: 77E56376XD890860G Your Transaction ID: 6E967396TD6877542 Buyer's Transaction ID: 77E56376XD890860G We are contacting you to let you know that we will not be continuing this investigation because this complaint was filed 45 or more days after the original transaction date.

However, we reserve the right for the next 180 days to begin an investigation if we later determine that this complaint should be examined. We are committed to providing our community a safe environment in which to transact. As stated in the PayPal User Agreement, we reserve the right to close or limit an account in response to excessive complaints received about failure to ship merchandise, non-delivery of services, merchandise not as described, or problems with merchandise shipped. You do not need to contact PayPal at this time, however, we encourage you to work directly with the buyer to amicably resolve this matter.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, PayPal Protection Services Department Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is not monitored and you will not receive a response. For assistance, log in to your PayPal account and click the Help link located in the top right corner of any page. If your inquiry is regarding a claim, log in to your PayPal account and go to the Resolution Center.

PayPal Email ID PP822 ----- Original Message ----- From: service@paypal.com To: archer926@msn.com Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 5:39 PM Subject: Notification of chargeback reversal: Case ID #PP-396-648-789 - PM001 Dear stanley cahill, We recently notified you that one of your buyers filed a chargeback stating unauthorized use of a credit card. It is PayPal's standard practice to dispute unwarranted chargebacks. Using the information you provided, we are in the process of disputing this chargeback with the buyer's card issuer. Because the card issuer has reversed this charge, PayPal is temporarily holding an amount equal to the disputed funds until this matter is resolved. If the card issuer decides the case in your favor, the funds will be available in your PayPal account.

The credit card company has charged PayPal a settlement fee for this chargeback. In accordance with the terms of the PayPal User Agreement, we have debited your PayPal account to cover this fee. Buyer's Name:Mary Prantil Buyer's Email:prant99@aol.com Transaction Date:Oct 12, 2007 Your Transaction ID: 9ET7904456341182W Buyer's Transaction ID: 3617020566305634D Transaction Amount:-$900.00 USDCase #:PP-396-648-789 To learn more about how to respond to this chargeback, visit the Resolution Center and click "Resolution Center tutorials". If you have additional information you’d like to upload or fax to us, please provide it as soon as possible. Just log in to your PayPal account, go to the Resolution Center, and click the “Details” link next to this case.

For faster processing, choose “Upload files.” We understand that you may not have been expecting this charge back. If this charge back has made your Pay Pal account balance negative, please reimburse us by adding funds to your account or by sending a check to the following address: Pay Pal Attn: Accounting Department P.O. Box 45950 Omaha, NE 68145-0950 United States Please submit your response in the next 72 hours. The charge back dispute process is subject to strict timelines. If you are unable to respond within 72 hours, we may be limited in the ways that we can dispute this charge back. After we receive and review any additional information, we can determine if we can take any further action. While we need to you respond quickly, a final decision about this charge back may take up to 75 days. -

If your Pay Pal account balance has become negative, please reimburse us within 60 days of the date of this email. This transaction was reversed for the following reasons(s): - We did not receive signed proof of delivery. For further assistance, please log in to your Pay Pal account and click the Help link located in the top right corner of any page, or email our Charge back Department at the email address below. Be sure to include your case ID number in the subject of the email. Sincerely, Pay Pal Charge back Department Email: chargeback-appeal1@paypal.com Fax: 402-537-5755 CB:PP-396-648-789:R4:USD900.00:01032008:9ET7904456341182W Pay Pal Email ID PP8006-15-08 Jim, I'm sending this in to clear my name with you. I'm sending this as proff that I no longer have Mary as a client and that she took back several of the payments made to me through pay pal and that I'm not involved in any kind of plott conspiracy with Mary or anyone against you and jan - I hope this will put an end to you thinking I'm part of any kind of attacks on you - we have had a few disagreements over the years but until now we have always worked them out and you know that attacking you on the internet is not my style -as always I remain here willing to discuss any of this with you at any time - sincerely mike brief summary Mary prant came to me in sept of 2007 and stated that you and jan cheated her and she begged me to take her case and help her - M agreed to pay me $3200.00 + $ 100.00 for pay pal fees and cost totaling $3300.00 and I was to cast repetitive type love and disruption prayers on her B.F. hani in sept, oct, nov and dec of 2008 and weekly updated prayers were also cast every week for M case -the e mail below from mary was her promising to repay the two charge backs and the amount due if I would coninue her case - then a short while later she again tried charging back the 1st $ 1500.00 made in sept 2007 through pay pal and also on the $300.00 she paid on march 5 2008 through pay pal which was so I'd do more work for her etc - it's been several times she promises top pay me if I'd work on her case again after she cheated me by filing charge backs with pay pal - and I took her back several times based on her saying she was sorry and that she promised to pay the full balance due plus all charges added by pay paland I did more work on her case and then a few weeks later she'd get mad and try more charge backs all over again and she stopped payment on a check she sent me omn 4-10-08 - this was the last straw and I have had no contact with her since - I tried my best to help her but she continued filing charge backs against me and stopped payment on that check too - also in sept 2007 when she first came to me I refused to do the curses that she wanted me to do on you and jan as you know that is not the way I work and I told her we may not be getting alone now but we were friends for many years -and I explained that you were within your rights to drop her as she was so obsessive and clearly abused you and jan and your services - I'm always here to discuss this with you at any time and I hope you and jan can see that I'm not involved in any conspiracy with anyone against you - sincerely mike $2000.00 BALANCE DUE AS OF MARCH 17 2008 THEN SINCE MARCH 17 2008 M FILED MORE CHARGE BACKS & STOPPED PAYMENT ON A CHECK TO ME $ 1500.00 CHARGE BACK ON 1ST PAYMENT MADE APROX SEPT 10 2007 $ 300.00 CHARGE BACK 3-5-2008 PAYMENT $ 200.00 CHECK 4-10-2008 M STOPPED PAYMENT

Original Message ----- From: Stanley Cahill To: Prant99@aol.com Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 7:25 AM Subject: Re: Payment Plan - What is owed? mary I just finished building more dolls for your prayers to be continued - you can write another handwritten letter of request and request exactly what you want - and send it when you can send a payment toward the balance due I need to buy suppliers materials and offering to make up the alchemy's to continue casting these prayers for you - without these implements they are not very effective - I will expect and honest effort that you are making payments to me on a regular bases - also my pay pal account is frozen - all payments must be made by cashiers check or money order - I'm always here for you mary - sincerely mike

our original $3200.00 u.s.d was our original agreement in sept 2007 $ 100.00 u.s.d was added to help cover the fee pay pal charges and you agreed to that after the first payment ======== $3300.00 u.s.d -

$1500.00 u.s.d. paid through pay pal around sept 10 2007 ======== $ 1800.00 u.s.d. balance due - $ 900.00 u.s.d. paid through pay pal on aprox oct 10 -15 2007 ========

$ 900.00 u.s.d balance due this was originally promised to be paid by nov 10th 2007 $ 450.00 u.s.d. paid through pay pal on aprox noc 10-15 2007 ======= $ 450.00 u.s.d. bal due on or before dec 10 2007 + $900.00 u.s.d the oct 2007 payment wascharged back by you through pay pal aprox in nov of 2007 + $450.00 u.s.d.

the nov 2007 payment charged back aprox late dec 2007 or early jan 2007 ======== $1800.00 u.s.d balance past due $ 500.00 u.s.d job payer done when you lost your job ======== $2300.00 u.s.d - $ 300.00 u.s.d paid by you to pay pal aprox 2 weeks ago 3-5-08 ======== $ 2000.00 u.s.d balance past due also you agreed to pay the fee pay pal charged for the charge backs - there not that much 80 - 90 bucks they charged 29-30 bucks on the 450 -

I'm blocked from even viewing that account in reality other than the $300.00 you just payed to pay pal considering the charge backs I haven't gotten anything from you since the first payment - yes I got the other two payments but pay pal is demanding their money and they have put a report against my credit because I actually owe them that money being you did the charge backs and the $300.00 did not come to me it went toward the amount I owe them plus the fees they added if you have any questions you can call this evening as I'm doing a ritual most of today and I won't be able to talk thanks mike -----

Original Message ----- From: Prant99@aol.com To: archer926@msn.com Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 3:12 AM Subject: Payment Plan - What is owed? Mike, I do not wish to cheat you but I also concerned about the case. I want a reuniting and disruprion on all other people that interfere...for Hani to move back in and make a commitment to me leading to marriage...honestly where is the case ??? I need to make monthly payments to you. You got $300 last week. So $1800. What is owed? Mary -----

Original Message ----- From: Celeste Schaub To: Mike Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 7:41 PM Subject: hello HI Mike, Just want to take a few minutes to go over what we talked about the other day, in reference to M P, your past client. I remember when you were working with her, and on the phone day and night for hours trying to calm her down, as I witnessed this more than once when I was down at your place doing spells together and even blooded on her spell while you were doing it along with my clients spells. In November of 2007 she emailed me when she was involved with you still, and had Pay Pal take back the money she had sent you for these same spells (prayers) work I already described above.

I am not sure of the amount but believe it was around $1, 800.00 for several different spells. Because the two of you were involved in the charge back she was doing with Pay Pal, she was asking me to do spell work for her. I declined doing anything for her for various reasons; one being she was already your client and I don't work with clients who are already engaged with another spell caster; two she wanted me to do spell work against Jim and Janhett (curses), as well as to get her boyfriend back. I got one more email from her the next day saying she really needed this work done, almost begging me to take her on as a new client.

I again wrote her back, she wanted me to call her, and stated the same to her again and forwarded you the emails she sent me, along with my responses. The next thing I knew she was sending me emails she was sending to Jim and Janhett, that had been cc'd to you and me, implying you and I were involved in some sort of conspiracy "to get Jim and Janhett". This never was as you know and I had to finally block her emails, but I was informed from a client of mine at the time that she was suppose to have told Jim that she flew down to meet you and I...how preposterous, I never even talked to this woman, or saw her before in my life, too much drama for me.

I told her Jim and I were having enough problems trying to work out our divorce with everyone else interfering and I wasn't getting involved in any of this bs. But yes she definitely did contract you for spell work, and I was there for at least two of the spells myself. I told her, her problems with Jim and Janhett were hers to work out and not to involve me. I told her you were in my opinion, which I still feel today, the best person to work with her for spell work as you were always completely dedicated to your clients and do things as Divinity dictates. You always answer the telephone and emails no matter when they come in. Your honesty and integrity is of the highest qualifications I know.

Hope this further clarifies our discussion the other night. Take care, Your friend and fellow magician, Celeste Mary Prantil Scamming Yet Another Magick Site She Claims Not To Know. Set the record straight, huh ?. Well I will set the record straight for you in this post ok ?. Ok Viewers, lets look at what Mary T. Prantil attempted to do to us on top of what she's done to these other sites in question. Please see the articles below outlining Prantil's negative scam plot that went horrible wrong with Miss Windglows Pay Pal account, You will further see the pattern unfolding in the Prantil scam routine. Here's where Mary Ripped Off Another Spell Caster By Charging Back On Them After The Worked Was Performed. More Fraud On Mary's Part. Who's The Real Fraud Here I ask you?. MARY PRANTIL WOULD BE THE ANSWER. SHE SAYS THAT SHE PAYS FOR HER WORK BUT APPARENTLY DOESN'T ACCORDING TO THIS SPELL CASTER BELOW. MAKES YOU WONDER ABOUT THE OTHER STATEMENTS THAT MARY PROFESSES AS TRUTH HUH ?.

Matilda the Psychic writes to Jan : "I've forwarded you two e-mails in regard to Mary Prantil. Yes, I did read for her, also she spent over 3 1/2 hours on the phone to me. During said time she cried, cursed and begged me to do a spell for her. I said that I don't usually do spells for people that I do not know.Also I told her that usually people charge 1, 000.00 for the type of spell that she wanted, as that is High Magic, not something simple. Also the first card I got for her situation was the Heirophant, follwed by the four of wands. I asked Mary if H _ _ _ _ was married, she said "No, not my H". Well she begged me ( begged Matilda the psychic NOT Jan ) so many times, interrupted my other business, called at all hours. she cried so much to me. I finally gave in and said I'd do the spell.

Then she bargined with me to do it for 800.00. Later she said that she had soooo many bills and could I do it for $500.00. I did it .It worked immediately, as her e-mail proves. Then she found out that H---- is a drug addict and that he is married and has several other girlfriends. I told her it was a moral choice, she admitted that in the past she "was no angel" with Jan's service when I ask her what happened. She charged me back on her credit card with Paypal and tryed to claim that the "merchandise" was not the quality that she expected.

Spell work is NOT merchandise because it is SPIRITUAL in nature and therefore not tangible. I said I would reverse the spell if she didn't pay me, I told her that she should get professional therapy and I even arranged free drug counseling for her boy friend; all of which she refused. I sent her a photo of part of the spell and a paper tailsman as proof that I performed the service." ( Direct email quote from Psychic Matilda to Jan ) HERE'S WHERE MARY REPORTED JIM MORGAN TO PAY PAL FOR FRAUD. MY QUESTION FOR MARY IS (HOW CAN YOU STEAL SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EXISTS?). THESE INVOICES WERE NEVER PAID BY MARY PRANTIL TO START WITH LOL.

The invoice was initially sent to Prantil ( numerous times because her credit card would not go through for the charge ) and the invoice was never paid by Prantil. She sent a signed personal check through regular first class mail for her spell services, then once her castings were completed and she messed up her relationship with her now ex, she then tried to go into Pay Pal and put money on the open invoice to which Jan promptly cancelled the invoice before Prantil had a chance.

Everything was explained to Prantil and she clearly understood that there would be no refunds because once a spell is cast it is a done deal. Mary Prantil tried to mess up Jan's Pay Pal account by attempting to pay her own invoice after her personal check that was written to Jan cleared so that she could force Jan to give her a refund anyway despite what she had already been told and had agreed to regarding payment, the casting, no refunds, etc. until Jan found out what she was doing and informed pay pal as to Prantil's fraudulent activities. Prantil was going to pay off on her own invoice.

Again, Jan caught on to what Prantil was getting ready to do which was to rip Jan off, so Jan cancelled the invoice from Prantil. Prantil then became so angry she reported Jim Morgan to Pay Pal and it was not even Mr. Morgan's Pay Pal account. What Prantil did at the point that she realized that she could not charge back on the open invoice that Prantil never paid but was getting ready to put funds on so she COULD charge back and force a refund anyway,Prantil then in anger w


SadisticPsychicJanWindglowsHURTME2

Houston,
Texas,
USA

Admit defeat Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan! Mary T Prantil does not have a Criminal Record and infact ddi not let you rip her off for $5000. Jan Windglows commits LARCENY daily on the Global Internet

#31Consumer Suggestion

Mon, December 21, 2009

Internet FRAUD

Complaint Rating:

Company information:
Blood Love and Lust Spells
Driggs, Idaho
United States
Phone: 8054556548
bloodloveandlustspells.com

BEWARE : Internet HACKERS -Jan Windglows-Jim Morgan-Stanley Cahill project own guilt of LARCENY; Unfounded empty claims of Criminal RECORD with no REAL EVIDENCE against X-client Mary T. Prantil Mary E. Prantil, Richard G. Prantil and Bill Bonham speak out defend truth of blatant lies of Jim Morgan, Jan Windglows and Mike Cahill on Rip-off Report.com and Complaint Board!!!

Admit defeat Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows are mentally ill and Criminals that are SORE LOSERS !!! Mary T Prantil did not allow these Internet Hackers to steal $5000 - Admit defeat Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan...call the NYPD and ask for reports - #277 at the 114 Precinct 718-626-9311 which is active and on file to have both of you arrested...Mary T Prantil has a Clean Criminal Record. Jan Windglows has a Criminal Record for Credit Card Theft and larceny in the amount of $50, 000!!! Admit defeat Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan! Admit defeat Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan! Mary T Prantil does not have a Criminal Record and infact did Internet FRAUD

Complaint Rating:

Company information:
Blood Love and Lust Spells
Driggs, Idaho
United States
Phone: 8054556548
bloodloveandlustspells.com

BEWARE : Internet HACKERS -Jan Windglows-Jim Morgan-Stanley Cahill project own guilt of LARCENY; Unfounded empty claims of Criminal RECORD with no REAL EVIDENCE against X-client Mary T. Prantil Mary E. Prantil, Richard G. Prantil and Bill Bonham speak out defend truth of blatant lies of Jim Morgan, Jan Windglows and Mike Cahill on Rip-off Report.com and Complaint Board!!!

Admit defeat Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows are mentally ill and Criminals that are SORE LOSERS !!! Mary T Prantil did not allow these Internet Hackers to steal $5000 - Admit defeat Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan...call the NYPD and ask for reports - #277 at the 114 Precinct 718-626-9311 which is active and on file to have both of you arrested...Mary T Prantil has a Clean Criminal Record. Jan Windglows has a Criminal Record for Credit Card Theft and larceny in the amount of $50, 000!!! Admit defeat Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan! Admit defeat Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan! Mary T Prantil does not have a Criminal Record and infact ddi not let you rip her off for $5000.  Jan Windglows commits LARCENY daily on the Global Internet DO NOT LET IT HAPPEN TO YOU !!! Admit defeat Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan!!!!


Mary Elizabeth Prantil Speaks out about Jim Morgan Blatant LIES on Rip-off Report.com Mary E Prantil, OWNER of Sierra Llama Critters and 4th wife of Frank G Prantil Speaks out!!

Po Box 595

Colfax, Ca
530-389-8969...

Richard G Prantil- San Diego Divorce Attorney Speaks out about Frank G Prantil
1357 7th Avenue
San Diego, CA 92101-4397
(619) 231-7001

Attorney -William E. Bonham LATE Frank G Prantil Law Partner
(916) 446-0111, 1008 2nd St # 301, Sacramento, CA

I am a MALE that lives in Houston, Texas and an X- client of Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows- I got ripped off by www.bloodloveandlustspells.com. Unfortunately I had dealings with Jan Windglows, Jim Morgan and Stanley/Mike Cahill - BEFORE all these false postings about Mary T Prantil. I only wish that Jan Windglows, Jim Morgan and Stanley Cahill had revealed their SICK MONTROUS CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR BEFORE...Because I would have been able to prevent the $7, 500 these Criminals STOLE from me.
These claims about Ms. Mary Prantil are all false. I DARE THESE SCAM ARTIST TO PROVIDE an actual authorization from PayPal, American Express, MasterCard and VISA where Ms. Prantil gave permission to charge her card for these FALSE INVOICES where these Criminals - Jan Windglows - Jim Morgan and Stanley Cahill claim that they were RIPPED OFF !!

FACT - Jan Windglows has been arrested for LARCENY - CONNECTED TO CREDIT CARD FRAUD in excess of $50, 000 !!

FACT - these Scam Internet Criminals were NOT able to RIP off $5000 from Mary T Prantil

FACT - Jan Windglows attempted unauthorized use of Mary T Prantil Credit Cards and PayPal account


I DARE THESE STUPID IDIOTS NAMELY JAN WINDGLOWS, JIM MORGAN, MIKE CAHILL OF WWW.BLOODLOVEANDLUSTSPELLS.COM TO PLEASE PROVIDE ACTUAL AUTHORIZATIONS FROM PAYPAY AND MAJOR CREDIT CARD CO. -YOUR FUN -Rip-off Scam HAS BEEN TAKEN FROM YOU AS YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PROVIDE SUCH AUTHORIZATIONS - AND INFACT YOU ARE CREATING AN ACTUAL CRIME SCENE ON ED MAGEDSON'S SITE.
Mary T. Prantil 917-224-6605 mprantil@aol.com is one of the coolest honest ppl that has does not have a Criminal Record and who never authorized use of her PayPal account in the amount of $5000 !!!

SO MORONS - JAN WINDGLOWS - JIM MORGAN - STANLEY CAHILL - BACK YOUR CLAIMS WITH "AUTHORIZATIONS" - THE REALITY IS YOURE TRIED TO RIP MARY T PRANTIL OFF AND YOU HAVE BEEN CAUGHT.

ANYBODY CAN CREATE AND FORMAT THE FALSE INVOICES THAT YOU HAVE POSTED ON RIP-OFF REPORT- CLEARLY YOU IDIOTS ARE ANGRY THAT YOU DID NOT GET THE $5000 YOU WANTED.DO YOU REALLY THINK THE GENERAL PUBLIC BELEIVES RIPOFF ARTIST THAT CLAIM TO BE SPELL-CASTERS???
ANYONE THAT IS IN THE SO CALLED SPELL-CASTING BUSINESS IS A CON-ARTIST!!!

Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows  ripped me off of $7, 500 - unfortunately this con-artist did get my money. I contacted Mary T. Prantil and she indeed did provide me with her clean criminal record that was official and did not cost $20 as idiot "Defender of the Innocent" claims...Mary T. Prantil - is innocent of all these claims and infact has reported all of this to the FBI, NYPD, and Attorney General.

Frank G. Prantil died in Oct 2006 and he had his Law License - Jan Windglows do you even know who your Father was??? call 530-389-8969 and speak to the widow of Frank G Prantil - find out the real facts about this great man and lawyer...Frank G Prantil cleared his name over 10 yrs ago...Frank G Prantil owned over 200 acres in Napa Valley, CA and had a very active law practice. Call Mary E Prantil Call Mary E Prantil 530-389-8969who owns a on-line business!!!

Prantil's Sierra Critters Homepage
Mary E Prantil ~ Owner. Please choose the page you would like to visit ... Mary E Prantil ~ (530) 389-8969 or Email prantil@foothill.net ...
www.sierracritters.com/ - Cached - Similar

Fiber - PlacerGROWN farmers, famers markets and Placer County ...
Contact: Mary E Prantil Address: P.O. Box 595. City/Zip: Colfax 95713 ... PlacerGROWN 11477 E Avenue Auburn, CA (530) 889-7398 placergrown@gmail.com ...


Show map of 20057 Spring Garden Rd, Foresthill, CA 95631
placergrown.org/placer_grown_results.php?type=4 - Cached


Find out the truth so Call Attorney Bill Bonham in Sacramento, CA who is the former law partner of the esteemed Notre Dame Graduate Frank G Prantil.
Attorneys and Lawyers in SacramentoCalifornia: tax attorneys ...
A directory of lawyers in Sacramento, California, including patent lawyers, . (916) 446-0111, 1008 2nd St # 301, Sacramento, CA ... Bonham, William E - Bonham William E, (916) 557-1113, 916 2nd St, ...
www.attorneyhelp.org/ca_sacramento_lawyers.html - Cached - Similar

Legal Referrals
William Bonham, 916 Second St., 2nd Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 916-747-3952 ... Bill Hornaday, 802 Hillcrest Dr, Felton CA 95018 (831) 835-0633; Matt Kumin, ...
www.canorml.org/laws/lc.html - Cached - Similar

AND Brother Richard G Prantil
Prantil, Richard - Richard G Prantil Law Offices in San Diego, CA ...
Feb 24, 2009 ... Prantil, Richard - Richard G Prantil Law Offices at 1357 7TH Ave Ste B, San Diego, CA 92101.


Show map of
?1357 7th Ave, San Diego, CA 92101-4397?
www.yellowbot.com/prantil-richard-richard-g-prantil-law-offices-san-diego-ca.html -
Divorce & Family Law Attorney - San Diego, California
Certified Specialist In Family Law By The State Bar Of California Board Of Legal Specialization Law Offices Of Richard G. Prantil - Attorney - San Diego, CA ...
www.thecityofsandiego.com/.../attorney-family-law.html - Cached - Similar


The only IDIOTS running out of lies are Jan Windglows, Jim Morgan and Stanley Cahill...if not - then start with the actual authorizations of these fabricated invoices where you claim Mary T Prantil ripped you off.
ADMIT defeat Jan Windglows - only you are projecting your own Criminal behavior of LARCENY and Credit Card Fraud !!!

Mary T Prantil does not have a Crminal RecordMary T Prantil only bought a psychic reading for $150 then these HACKERS TRIED use her MasterCard for $5000DO NOT USE INTERNET HACKERS JAN WINDLGLOWS, JIM MORGAN OR MIKE CAHILL aka Stanley Cahill!!!


BEWARE- Jan Windglows-Jim Morgan- Mike Cahill-INTERNET HACKERS AND SCAMMERS NOT SPELL CASTERS IT COULD HAPPEN TO YOUPROTECT YOUR INTERNET REPUTATION AND IDENTITY !!!

 

 not let you rip her off for $5000.  Jan Windglows commits LARCENY daily on the Global Internet DO NOT LET IT HAPPEN TO YOU !!! Admit defeat Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan!!!!


Mary Elizabeth Prantil Speaks out about Jim Morgan Blatant LIES on Rip-off Report.com Mary E Prantil, OWNER of Sierra Llama Critters and 4th wife of Frank G Prantil Speaks out!!

Po Box 595

Colfax, Ca
530-389-8969...

Richard G Prantil- San Diego Divorce Attorney Speaks out about Frank G Prantil
1357 7th Avenue
San Diego, CA 92101-4397
(619) 231-7001

Attorney -William E. Bonham LATE Frank G Prantil Law Partner
(916) 446-0111, 1008 2nd St # 301, Sacramento, CA

I am a MALE that lives in Houston, Texas and an X- client of Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows- I got ripped off by www.bloodloveandlustspells.com. Unfortunately I had dealings with Jan Windglows, Jim Morgan and Stanley/Mike Cahill - BEFORE all these false postings about Mary T Prantil. I only wish that Jan Windglows, Jim Morgan and Stanley Cahill had revealed their SICK MONTROUS CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR BEFORE...Because I would have been able to prevent the $7, 500 these Criminals STOLE from me.
These claims about Ms. Mary Prantil are all false. I DARE THESE SCAM ARTIST TO PROVIDE an actual authorization from PayPal, American Express, MasterCard and VISA where Ms. Prantil gave permission to charge her card for these FALSE INVOICES where these Criminals - Jan Windglows - Jim Morgan and Stanley Cahill claim that they were RIPPED OFF !!

FACT - Jan Windglows has been arrested for LARCENY - CONNECTED TO CREDIT CARD FRAUD in excess of $50, 000 !!

FACT - these Scam Internet Criminals were NOT able to RIP off $5000 from Mary T Prantil

FACT - Jan Windglows attempted unauthorized use of Mary T Prantil Credit Cards and PayPal account


I DARE THESE STUPID IDIOTS NAMELY JAN WINDGLOWS, JIM MORGAN, MIKE CAHILL OF WWW.BLOODLOVEANDLUSTSPELLS.COM TO PLEASE PROVIDE ACTUAL AUTHORIZATIONS FROM PAYPAY AND MAJOR CREDIT CARD CO. -YOUR FUN -Rip-off Scam HAS BEEN TAKEN FROM YOU AS YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PROVIDE SUCH AUTHORIZATIONS - AND INFACT YOU ARE CREATING AN ACTUAL CRIME SCENE ON ED MAGEDSON'S SITE.
Mary T. Prantil 917-224-6605 mprantil@aol.com is one of the coolest honest ppl that has does not have a Criminal Record and who never authorized use of her PayPal account in the amount of $5000 !!!

SO MORONS - JAN WINDGLOWS - JIM MORGAN - STANLEY CAHILL - BACK YOUR CLAIMS WITH "AUTHORIZATIONS" - THE REALITY IS YOURE TRIED TO RIP MARY T PRANTIL OFF AND YOU HAVE BEEN CAUGHT.

ANYBODY CAN CREATE AND FORMAT THE FALSE INVOICES THAT YOU HAVE POSTED ON RIP-OFF REPORT- CLEARLY YOU IDIOTS ARE ANGRY THAT YOU DID NOT GET THE $5000 YOU WANTED.DO YOU REALLY THINK THE GENERAL PUBLIC BELEIVES RIPOFF ARTIST THAT CLAIM TO BE SPELL-CASTERS???
ANYONE THAT IS IN THE SO CALLED SPELL-CASTING BUSINESS IS A CON-ARTIST!!!

Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows  ripped me off of $7, 500 - unfortunately this con-artist did get my money. I contacted Mary T. Prantil and she indeed did provide me with her clean criminal record that was official and did not cost $20 as idiot "Defender of the Innocent" claims...Mary T. Prantil - is innocent of all these claims and infact has reported all of this to the FBI, NYPD, and Attorney General.

Frank G. Prantil died in Oct 2006 and he had his Law License - Jan Windglows do you even know who your Father was??? call 530-389-8969 and speak to the widow of Frank G Prantil - find out the real facts about this great man and lawyer...Frank G Prantil cleared his name over 10 yrs ago...Frank G Prantil owned over 200 acres in Napa Valley, CA and had a very active law practice. Call Mary E Prantil Call Mary E Prantil 530-389-8969who owns a on-line business!!!

Prantil's Sierra Critters Homepage
Mary E Prantil ~ Owner. Please choose the page you would like to visit ... Mary E Prantil ~ (530) 389-8969 or Email prantil@foothill.net ...
www.sierracritters.com/ - Cached - Similar

Fiber - PlacerGROWN farmers, famers markets and Placer County ...
Contact: Mary E Prantil Address: P.O. Box 595. City/Zip: Colfax 95713 ... PlacerGROWN 11477 E Avenue Auburn, CA (530) 889-7398 placergrown@gmail.com ...


Show map of 20057 Spring Garden Rd, Foresthill, CA 95631
placergrown.org/placer_grown_results.php?type=4 - Cached


Find out the truth so Call Attorney Bill Bonham in Sacramento, CA who is the former law partner of the esteemed Notre Dame Graduate Frank G Prantil.
Attorneys and Lawyers in SacramentoCalifornia: tax attorneys ...
A directory of lawyers in Sacramento, California, including patent lawyers, . (916) 446-0111, 1008 2nd St # 301, Sacramento, CA ... Bonham, William E - Bonham William E, (916) 557-1113, 916 2nd St, ...
www.attorneyhelp.org/ca_sacramento_lawyers.html - Cached - Similar

Legal Referrals
William Bonham, 916 Second St., 2nd Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 916-747-3952 ... Bill Hornaday, 802 Hillcrest Dr, Felton CA 95018 (831) 835-0633; Matt Kumin, ...
www.canorml.org/laws/lc.html - Cached - Similar

AND Brother Richard G Prantil
Prantil, Richard - Richard G Prantil Law Offices in San Diego, CA ...
Feb 24, 2009 ... Prantil, Richard - Richard G Prantil Law Offices at 1357 7TH Ave Ste B, San Diego, CA 92101.


Show map of
?1357 7th Ave, San Diego, CA 92101-4397?
www.yellowbot.com/prantil-richard-richard-g-prantil-law-offices-san-diego-ca.html -
Divorce & Family Law Attorney - San Diego, California
Certified Specialist In Family Law By The State Bar Of California Board Of Legal Specialization Law Offices Of Richard G. Prantil - Attorney - San Diego, CA ...
www.thecityofsandiego.com/.../attorney-family-law.html - Cached - Similar


The only IDIOTS running out of lies are Jan Windglows, Jim Morgan and Stanley Cahill...if not - then start with the actual authorizations of these fabricated invoices where you claim Mary T Prantil ripped you off.
ADMIT defeat Jan Windglows - only you are projecting your own Criminal behavior of LARCENY and Credit Card Fraud !!!

Mary T Prantil does not have a Crminal RecordMary T Prantil only bought a psychic reading for $150 then these HACKERS TRIED use her MasterCard for $5000DO NOT USE INTERNET HACKERS JAN WINDLGLOWS, JIM MORGAN OR MIKE CAHILL aka Stanley Cahill!!!


BEWARE- Jan Windglows-Jim Morgan- Mike Cahill-INTERNET HACKERS AND SCAMMERS NOT SPELL CASTERS IT COULD HAPPEN TO YOUPROTECT YOUR INTERNET REPUTATION AND IDENTITY !!!

 


The REAL Truth Still Prevails All Over The Internet

Astoria,
New York,
USA

Mary Prantil Mary Praintil Mary Theresa Prantil Mary T. Prantil Mary T. Prantil grew up learning how to be a criminal from her father crooked attorney Frank G. Prantil The Real Truth is Here

#31Consumer Comment

Thu, December 10, 2009

Apparently CRIME runs in Mary T. Prantil's family......see the factual information below in this post on Mary T. Prantil's criminal crooked attorney father, Frank G. Prantil.  Not only is Mary T. Prantil a criminal but so was her father. 

Mary T. Prantil is following in her criminal father's footsteps while trying to cover up the truth, and hide behind all of her lies.  Contact Jan Windglows and she will forward true records all about this to anyone who asks her for proof.  

Jan has all the Pay Pal records and transactions and case numbers for Pay Pal that do not reflect any proof of Mary T. Prantil EVER paying Jan through Pay Pal - PROOF AND FACT. 

Mary T. Prantil does not know how to produce FACTS she only knows how to run her mouth and SLING MUD at innocent others that have done nothing to her whatsoever.

Mary T. Prantil has her proof.....and Mary T. Prantil IS GOING TO JAIL for fraudulent and criminal activities and many other crimes she has committed against innocent people.

Jan Windglows is the most beautiful and kindest lady I have ever met, and so is her husband James.  In fact, Jan  is home and happy running her business give her a call- just go to her web site and her phone number is there because I just spoke to her.  She and James are VERY HAPPY because they were just recently married !  Give them a call and congratulate them.....

These ongoing LIES of Mary Prantil saying that Jan Windglows was arrested for larceny is utter HOGWASH and more lies and s**t made up out of the crazy drug fried out rotten brain of criminal Mary Prantil.

Look like Mary Prantil is running out of lies to tell about Jan and James so she is making up MORE LIES, and guess what?  NOBODY believes you anymore, Mary !

ALL the information about Mary Prantil's deceased father is CORRECT.  He has his name listed all over attorney's websites on the internet, and is not spoken of with any type of respect whatsoever.  Type Frank G. Prantil into your browser and you will find out all about it.

The fact of the matter is , Mary Prantil is up here shooting off her mouth telling lie after lie about Jan Windglows and James Morgan- who only tried to help her in times past when she was a client of theirs long ago. 

They terminated her case because she broke all the rules and regulations she promised to keep when Jan first took her case, so who's fault is that?  It is Mary Prantil's fault. 

Actually I heard that Mary Prantil DID get her spell manifested with Jans' services, THEN PRANTIL MESSED EVERYTHING UP between herself and her then boyfriend, then was OUT OF CONTROL so Jan had to drop her case completely.

I know a lot of people that are involved in this Prantil scandal, so Andromeda, do not get up here and come across to the public like you know it all, because you don't. 

Mary Prantil is a criminal, she is a stalker, she is a computer hacker, a phone hacker, a liar, she has been arrested several times and currently is IN A LOT OF TROUBLE, and SHE IS GOING WHACKO BECAUSE SHE KNOWS SHE WILL BE IN JAIL SOON.

Jan Windglows and James Morgan did NOTHING wrong- they are defending themselves against this MONSTER Mary Prantil.  

Have you ever read all the postings here about Mary Prantil and how she steals from businesses?  Jan and James only deal in FACTS they are not liars or thieves that have to make up stories because they have FACTS AND THEY HAVE PROOF and back their facts and everything they say on this forum up with FACTS and NOT lies like Mary T. Prantil does.

Prantil is going as far as to post lies such as Jan Windglows being arrested for larceny, which is another lie on Prantil's part.  All the posts on Mary Prantil and her father are TRUE.

Jan and James have every right to defend themselves against Prantil-----so if Mary Prantil does not want any more information being posted about her or her family that can incriminate her even MORE,  IF SHE CAN'T TAKE IT SHE SHOULD NOT DISH IT OUT.

Unfortunately for Mary Prantil, she feels she has to rely on lies to the public to try and discredit the names of Jan and James because she does not have anything else except the lies she dreams up in her attempts to cause trouble for Jan and James. 

I do defend the innocent- yes it is true that Mary Prantil's father is deceased, but that is NOT the point- the point IS, that Mary Prantil learned her criminal behavior from her father whether he is deceased or not.

Mary Prantil is a criminal, and so was her father.  If Mary Prantil does not like information about her deceased father being posted here, then she should STOP slinging mud constantly at two innocent people and telling lies about them on the internet.

It is OBVIOUS that Mary Prantil is getting what is coming to her.   Jan Windglows is not guilty of any crimes neither is James Morgan.  But Prantil certainly is.

In fact, Mary Prantil started this scandal.  Jan and James did not come up here on this forum out of the blue for no reason or to hurt anyone, but only to defend themselves.

Jan and James were not attempting to pick on Mary Prantil's deceased father, but by showing the FACTS ( not LIES  or false information ) about Mary Prantil AND her deceased father, the public now knows where Mary Prantil learned to be a criminal and indeed Prantil IS following in her father's footsteps.

Mary Prantil brought this upon herself.  If she would have left these two innocent people alone to begin with, all of this could have been avoided. 

Everyone who comes to this forum- you should read these posts again. Mary Prantil is the one at fault here. 
 
You apparently do not know Jan or James but I will tell you that they are forthright, Jan runs an honest and successful business, and they do everything to help their clients.  Anyone that reads this should call Jan and James and see what caring and honest people they are.

Mary Prantil lies, and lies, and lies......posting such GARBAGE up here like Jan and James are idolaters and that they drink their own blood.

The only other thing I have to say is that Mary Prantil's deceased father is probably rolling in his grave and looking down on his daughter with disappointment and disgust for all the trouble she is in, and has attempted to get other innocent people into. 
 
MARY T. PRANTIL SHAME SHAME SHAME ON YOU for who and what you are.  You are TRASH so go crawl into a trash can somewhere and stop running your liar mouth about Jan and James.

Mary Prantil is in a LOT OF LEGAL TROUBLE RIGHT NOW and if anyone that reads this  feels sorry for this vicious woman Prantil, I DARE anyone who reads this forum posting to call Mary Prantil and give her your email address and your phone number. 

YOU WILL THEN SEE for yourself what kind of TRASH Mary Prantil REALLY is, and what she is capable of, because Mary Prantil will do all the same things to YOU, so watch out about what you are saying.

If anyone reading this has any doubts about what I am writing here, and think that Mary T. Prantil is NOT a criminal, call Mary Prantil and see what a whacko she is for yourself. 

Not only is Mary T. Prantil wicked and evil, but she puts viruses into computers and uses a phone spoofing card so she can use disconnected numbers to call people she does not even know all night long---COLLECT-  AND telling them she is someone else !

( Prantil REALLY needs to be locked in a rubber room!!!!!!!!!)

Just type in Mary Prantil in your Internet browser, I DARE YOU and get her phone number and write her an email.

Then come back and post on this forum after she has stalked you, harassed you, threatened you, etc. then Prantil will be on this forum making up all kinds of lies about you too, AND posting them all over the Internet !!!!

If you decide to email Mary Prantil, make sure you have a good anti virus program on your computer.  She is mean and vindictive and outright EVIL and she is known all over the Internet for sending people viruses to try and destroy their computers.

So......are you going to take my dare and give Mary Prantil a call and give her your phone number? 

If you DO,  Mary Prantil will harass and stalk you until you are forced to change your phone number and block her from your emails.
 
Or mabie after Prantil emails you will not even HAVE a computer because she is a phone and computer hacker and loves to send viruses and loves to harass and stalk because she is in so much trouble she cannot even post on ROR under her real name.  She is a chicken sh_t that keeps hiding under numerous fake names. 

Call Jan & James and they will be happy to provide Law Enforcement phone numbers where you can speak to actual police that have arrested Mary T. Prantil SEVERAL TIMES over an eight year and longer period of time.  Jan & James may be reached at 208-714-4348.


MATTER OF THE DISBARRMENT OF  CRIMINAL ATTORNEY FRANK G. PRANTIL

(Mary T. Prantil KEEPS POSTING LIES ABOUT Innocent business and top spell casters  BLOOD LOVE AND LUST SPELLS, JIM MORGAN AND JAN WINDGLOWS OF BLOOD LOVE AND LUST SPELLS...

it is no WONDER that Mary T. Prantil is such a CRIMINAL and SCAM CON...hey public take a look and read below and click the links to verify that Mary T. Prantil and her father are the same birds of a feather- criminals, liars, and drug addicts !!!

After you THE PUBLIC read the information below, you will learn all about Mary T. Prantil's father getting disbarred TWICE as a lawyer, that he caused a MISTRIAL for a famous HIGH PROFILE murder case, that he  charged several times for misconduct,mis representing his clients, all about his cocaine addictions, his lies, schemes, causing a mistrial for a famous controversial murder case, stealing money in the amount of $750,000 from a safe from inside a client's house...


Mary T. Prantil apparently learned everything she knows about being a criminal from her criminal father. PRANTIL GET OFF THE INTERNET AND STOP SHOWING YOUR UGLY LIAR FACE BECAUSE EVERYONE KNOWS ALL ABOUT YOU AND YOUR CRIMINAL FATHER. TAKE A HIKE, YOU ROTTEN LIAR SCUM GUTTER TRASH.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. D-787

110 S. Ct. 493, 493 U.S. 972, 107 L. Ed. 2d 497, 58 U.S.L.W. 3351, 1989.SCT.45677 <http://www.versuslaw.com>

November 27, 1989

IN THE MATTER OF DISBARRMENT OF FRANK G. PRANTIL

For earlier order herein, see Rehnquist, Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy

It having been reported to the Court that Frank G. Prantil, of Fair Oaks, California, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of California and this Court by order of May 15, 1989, having suspended the said Frank G. Prantil from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued;

It is ordered that the said Frank G. Prantil be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

Disposition

Disbarrment entered.

19891127

1998 VersusLaw Inc.

http://wi.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.%5CSCT%5CSCT2%5C1989%5C19891127_0045677.SCT.htm/qx

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Powered by VersusLaw, Inc.
Home | Advertise | About | Feedback | Terms | Privacy Policy | FAQ
All contents Copyright 2008 - 2009 VersusLaw, Inc. Bellevue, WA, USA. All rights reserved

****************************************************************************************************
On trial before the bar court in San Francisco, FRANK PRANTIL [#35155], 67, of Sacramento is charged with multiple counts of failing to perform legal services competently. Prantil was disbarred in 1989, reinstated in 1994 and charged with misconduct in 2002. The trial on the new charges was ongoing at press time and although the bar had not formally asked for his disbarment, it is a possible penalty.

The 1989 disbarment was the result of convictions for forgery and being an accessory to possess cocaine.

http://www.calbar.ca.gov/state/calbar/calbar_cbj.jsp?sCategoryPath=/Home/Attorney%20Resources/California%20Bar%20Journal/June2005&sCatHtmlPath=cbj/2005-06_TH_03_2nd-disbarments.html&sCatHtmlTitle=Top%20Headlines

**********************************************************************************************************

In a case two miles across town at the State Bar offices on Howard Street -- and at the other end of the world of privilege -- 67-year-old defense attorney Frank Prantil is facing a task he's already performed numerous times -- defending himself against accusations that he's acted unethically as an attorney. In 1979, Prantil was suspended from practicing law after he was accused of improperly representing a client. While on probation, Prantil was alleged to have participated in a check-fraud scheme. He was convicted of forgery and disbarred, according to the California Supreme Court opinion confirming Prantil's disbarment.

Prantil later took advantage of California rules that allow disbarred attorneys to ask for reinstatement after five years. Prantil successfully argued that he had rehabilitated himself, and resumed practice in 1994.

Prantil is now facing State Bar disciplinary charges, which could potentially get him disbarred again, alleging that he failed to competently defend a client, then improperly charged the client for his services.

Prantil's case, along with three cases decided earlier this year in which California attorneys were disbarred for a second time, has added steam to a nine-year-old bureaucratic proposal to give judges the option of disbarring the worst attorneys for life.

In California, there now exists no legal concept of permanent disbarment. A State Bar committee on Nov. 15 will consider the possibility of changing that, if only slightly. Rather than making all disbarments permanent, it would extend from five to seven years the amount of time disbarred attorneys would have to wait before requesting to be reinstated, and would give judges the option of forever banishing the worst of California's worst attorneys.

The fact that it's taken nine years for such a mild proposal to reach this preliminary step hints at a lack of seriousness the California legal establishment lobby applies to abuses by its own members.

http://www.sfweekly.com/2005-11-09/news/baring-equality/

***********************************************************************************************************

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank G. PRANTIL, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

June 25, 1985

764 F.2d 548

Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., argued, Peter K. Nunez, U.S. Atty., Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Eugene G. Iredale, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

AMENDED OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of California.

Before FERGUSON and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, * District Judge.

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:

1
The defendant, a criminal defense attorney, appeals his conviction on eight out of eleven counts alleged in an indictment for the offenses of perjury, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1623; false statements, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1001; and being accessory after the fact, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3. All of the defendant's convictions are predicated on actions he took while representing a criminal defendant, Betty Powell, in a separate criminal prosecution. After a seven-day trial the jury found the defendant not guilty on two counts of harboring a fugitive and perjury. The district court had previously dismissed the misprision of a felony count before the trial began. On appeal, the defendant raises a host of issues which, for the most part, we need not address. Three of the defendant's challenges, however, require reversal of the defendant's convictions for the reasons explained herein.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

2
The defendant was retained by Ronald Powell to represent his wife, Betty Lou Powell, and her son in a federal criminal prosecution on various drug-related charges.1 Mr. Powell had been a previous client of the defendant in unrelated criminal proceedings. After Mrs. Powell and her son were arrested at the Powell residence on April 23, 1982 in connection with the narcotics charges, Mr. Powell, who was also named in the felony arrest warrant, remained a fugitive until his apprehension on August 10, 1982. On the day of his wife's arrest, Mr. Powell telephoned the defendant, Frank Prantil, and retained his services for the criminal proceedings against his immediate family. Throughout Mr. Powell's fugitive status, the defendant periodically telephoned Mr. Powell and met him on at least two occasions.

3
During their first meeting after the incarceration of Mrs. Powell, Mr. Powell presented the defendant with a partial payment of the retainer agreement and directed the defendant to the whereabouts of other sources of cash in various bank accounts and at the Powell residence. Mrs. Powell, unable to make a $750, 000 bond, remained incarcerated until the completion of her criminal trial. She gave the defendant the power of attorney to collect the funds from the various bank accounts. The defendant also retrieved a substantial sum of money from a floor safe at the Powell residence that had been overlooked at the time of the Powell family arrest. Although questions over the capacity in which Mr. Prantil retained custody of these monies (as attorney fees or in bailment for Mrs. Powell) occupied a substantial portion of the defendant's trial, we need not parse the evidence on this subject here. Pursuant to the retainer agreement negotiated by Mr. Powell, the defendant represented Mrs. Powell for the duration of her criminal trial. The case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Charles Gorder.

4
Mr. Prantil succeeded in obtaining an acquittal on all but four of the fifteen criminal counts leveled against his client Mrs. Powell. During the course of his representation of Mrs. Powell, the defendant also sent his sister-in-law, Malvina Schmidt, to meet the fugitive Ronald Powell for reasons not relevant here. Within the same time frame, the defendant, on several occasions, acted as the conduit for negotiations between the fugitive Ronald Powell and Assistant U.S. Attorney Gorder for Mr. Powell's surrender. During the period when Mr. Powell was a fugitive, the defendant was summoned before a grand jury and questioned by Mr. Gorder concerning his contacts and relationship with Mr. Powell. Three of the defendant's five perjury convictions rest on responses he made to Mr. Gorder's grand jury examination. The remaining two perjury charges and the two false statement counts stem from the events surrounding the defendant's efforts to obtain Mrs. Powell's release on bond pending the appeal from her criminal conviction. For purposes of this appeal, however, we need only discuss the evidence presented on one perjury count.

5
One of the defendant's perjury convictions rests on grand jury testimony the defendant gave under questioning by Mr. Gorder regarding a trip to Omaha, Nebraska. In his testimony the defendant stated that he was picked up by a blonde woman at his hotel in Omaha, Nebraska who took him to meet Mr. Powell and then transported the defendant to the airport. The defendant further testified that he did not know the identity of this woman. At trial the government contended that the defendant committed perjury when he denied knowing the name of this woman.

6
Under the government's theory, the defendant falsely denied knowing the identity of this blonde woman in order to protect the woman from the grand jury's investigation. The government unsuccessfully sought to prove that the blonde woman who met the defendant at his hotel was Malvina Schmidt, the defendant's sister-in-law. The evidence at trial revealed that although the defendant had been met and transported to a different airport by a blonde woman on a different occasion, no one picked up the defendant at his Omaha hotel. The evidence did demonstrate that the defendant eventually met his sister-in-law at a restaurant in the Omaha area. Accordingly, on appeal the government has shifted its perjury allegation by recasting the defendant's denial of knowledge about the name of the blonde woman who met him at his hotel into a denial of "knowing who was with [Mr.] Powell in the Omaha area." In response, the defendant claims his conviction should be reversed because the identity of the woman whom he incorrectly recalled to have met at his Omaha hotel is immaterial to any matters then before the grand jury and thus not perjurious.

II. ISSUES ON APPEAL

7
The defendant has raised several challenges to his convictions on appeal. We reach only three of his challenges. The defendant's first allegation of error involves the refusal of the trial court to grant a pretrial motion to have the prosecutor, Mr. Gorder, recused from the case so that the defendant could call Mr. Gorder as a witness. The defendant also claims that the prosecutor exceeded the bounds of proper argument during closing argument and the defendant was thereby prejudiced. The final contention of error challenges the materiality of the defendant's allegedly perjurious statements regarding the blonde woman at the Omaha airport.

8
The defendant has also raised a claim of insufficiency of the evidence as to counts seven and eight of the indictment which charged the defendant with violations of the false statement statute, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1001. In essence, the government presented evidence that the defendant attempted to secure the release of his client Betty Powell through the submission of an appeal bond form that the defendant knew was not authorized by the named bond company. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution we find the evidence presented sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). Nonetheless, for the reasons discussed in the balance of the opinion, we reverse the defendant's convictions on these and the other counts of the indictment.

A. The Propriety of a Prosecuting Witness

9
The prosecutor in this case, Assistant United States Attorney Charles Gorder, was also the prosecutor in the previous trial of Betty Powell. Mr. Gorder not only opposed the defendant in that trial but also conducted the examination of the defendant in both the grand jury and bond proceedings that are the subject of defendant's perjury convictions in this case. Mr. Gorder was also involved in the discussions with the bond agency as to the adequacy of Mrs. Powell's bond collateral which gave rise to the defendant's false statement convictions. Finally, on several occasions Mr. Gorder negotiated directly with the defendant for the surrender of Ronald Powell, the fugitive whom the defendant was accused of harboring and giving aid. Thus, although he never took the stand, Mr. Gorder was a witness to, and indeed a participant in, some aspect of all of the events alleged in the indictment.

10
The defendant was charged and convicted of being an accessory after the fact to Mr. Powell's criminal offenses in that the defendant did "receive, relieve, comfort and assist Ronald Lee Powell in order to hinder and prevent his apprehension, trial and punishment, " in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3. During trial the principal defense asserted by the defendant to this count, and the harboring a fugitive charge, revolved around the defendant's efforts to successfully negotiate Mr. Powell's surrender with Mr. Gorder. Rather than harboring or assisting Mr. Powell, the defendant contended he was actively conducting the ongoing negotiations for Mr. Powell's timely surrender through direct communications with both Mr. Gorder and Mr. Powell. Obviously, this defense hinges substantially on the availability of evidence detailing the defendant's role in these surrender negotiations.

11
Both before and during the trial defense counsel unsuccessfully moved the court to recuse the prosecutor to enable the defense to call him as a witness. After final argument the defendant moved for a mistrial because the prosecutor's remarks "reaffirm[ed] Mr. Gorder's role as a witness in the case without cross-examination, because they appeared to be, in the way that they were framed, assertions of personal knowledge based on his dealings with Mr. Prantil." At every juncture, the prosecutor refused either to recuse himself or to testify. The trial court declined to disturb the prosecutor's decision and denied, without comment, all of the defendant's motions on this matter.

12
The prosecutor defended his decision, and the trial court concurred, on the grounds that his testimony was unnecessary and cumulative to the defendant's case. We recognize that a defendant has an obligation to exhaust other available sources of evidence before a court should sustain a defendant's efforts to call a participating prosecutor as a witness. United States v. West, 680 F.2d 652, 654 (9th Cir.1982). Nonetheless, the defendant's obligation to resort to alternative means of adducing factual testimony is not absolute. Both the quality and quantity of the alternate sources of evidence are proper subjects for comparison with that sought directly from the participating prosecutor. For example, in this case the prosecutor contends that his testimony on the defendant's efforts to arrange for the surrender of the fugitive Ron Powell was unnecessary and cumulative because the defendant could have presented some testimony on this point through an FBI agent who listened to some, but not all, of the relevant discussions. The prosecutor also avers that the defendant himself was available to testify as to any conversations for which there are no other witnesses besides the defendant and the prosecutor. The true worth of the prosecutor's generous suggestion that the defendant himself testify in order to "exhaust" all other sources of testimony, however, becomes self-evident when the prosecutor subsequently portrays the defendant's testimony as self-serving and "sleazy" in his summation before the jury.

13
Regardless of the prosecutor's view of the utility of his own testimony, the district judge is charged with the responsibility of making determinations as to the materiality of witness testimony. In so doing, the court must honor the defendant's constitutional rights under the confrontation and compulsory process clauses of the Sixth Amendment. The unequivocal admonition of the Supreme Court on this point bears repetition here:

14
The need to develop all relevant facts in the adversary system is both fundamental and comprehensive. The ends of criminal justice would be defeated if judgments were to be founded on a partial or speculative presentation of the facts. The very integrity of the judicial system and public confidence in the system depend on full disclosure of all the facts, within the framework of the rules of evidence. To ensure that justice is done, it is imperative to the function of courts that compulsory process be available for the production of evidence needed either by the prosecution or by the defense.
MARY PRANTIL HAS BEEN RUNNING AROUND THIS FORUM STATING THIS AND THAT UNDER FALSE NAMES AND PLACES WHILE NOT REALLY PRODUCING ANY SOLID EVIDENCE TO THESE SAME CLAIMS MADE BY HER AGAINST US. NO VALIDITY AND OR SUBSTANCE AT ALL TO HER CLAIMS OTHER THEN HER VENTING ACCUSATIONS COMING AT US OUT OF NOWHERE.

Here's where Mary Ripped Off Another Spell Caster By Charging Back On Them After The Worked Was Performed. More Fraud On Mary's Part. Who's The Real Fraud Here I ask you?. MARY PRANTIL WOULD BE THE ANSWER. SHE SAYS THAT SHE PAYS FOR HER WORK BUT APPARENTLY DOESN'T ACCORDING TO THIS SPELL CASTER BELOW. MAKES YOU WONDER ABOUT THE OTHER STATEMENTS THAT MARY PROFESSES AS TRUTH HUH ?.

Jan: I've forwarded you two e-mails in regard to Mary Prantil. Yes, I did read for her, also she spent over 3 1/2 hours on the phone to me. During said time she cried, cused and begged me to do a spell for her. I said that I don't usually do spells for people that I do not know.Also I told her that usually people charge 1,000.00 for the type of spell that she wanted, as that is High Magic , not something simple.

Also the first card I got for her situation was the Heirophant, follwed by the four of wands. I asked Mary if H _ _ _ _ was married , she said "No, not my H".

Well she begged me so many times, interrupted my other business, called at all hours. she cried so much to me. I finally gave in and said I'd do the spell. Then she bargined with me to do it for 800.00. Later she said that she had soooo many bills and could I do it for 500.00.

I did it .It worked immediately, as her e-mail proves. Then she found out that H---- is a drug addict and that he is married and has several other girlfriends. I told her it was a moral choice, she admitted that in the past she "was no angel" with Jans service when I ask her what happened. She charged me back on her credit card with Paypal and tryed to claim that the "merchandise" was not the quality that she expected.

I said I would reverse the spell if she didn't pay me, I told her that she should get professional therapy and I even arranged free drug counseling for her boy friend; all of which she refused. I sent her a photo of part of the spell and a paper tailsman as proof that I performed the service.

HERE'S WHERE MARY REPORTED JIM MORGAN TO PAY PAL FOR FRAUD. MY QUESTION FOR MARY IS (HOW CAN YOU STEAL SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EXISTS?). THESE INVOICES WERE NEVER PAID BY MARY PRANTIL TO START WITH LOL.

Mary Prantil tried to screw up Jan's Pay Pal account by attempting to pay her own invoices until Jan found out what she was doing and informed pay pal as to Prantil's fraudulent activities. Prantil was going to pay off on her own invoices only to cancel them OUT soon after so she could place a claim of Fraud against Jim Morgan on this account. Again, Jim Morgan doesn't even own the company nor does he have anything to do with the administrative functions of this company such as receiving monies for anything especially spell work.

Of course Pay Pal laughed at this little Prantil Con Game and Denied Prantil's fraudulent claims against us. Mary also was confused in the way that she was trying to report Jim Morgan to pay pal for running and or owning a company to which he has no connections to other then helping out with the counseling part of the operation to which he doesn't get paid for.

See how miss-informed Mary Is. Basically what Mary was trying to do was get her work performed for free by paying Jan with checks and then attempting to get her money back for these cashed checks through pay pal. Notice where this email originated from below and who it was sent to under the original message heading. To those of you that know how to check IP Addresses this should clear up any doubts that this is her actual communication to pay pal. So Much for Mary Prantil's claims of fraud & Tax Evasion on our part.

-----Original Message-----
From: m prantil
To: complaint-response@paypal.com
Cc: wizardmorgan2@aol.com; passionspells@aol.com
Sent: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:12 pm
Subject: Invoice From James Morgan

PayPay,

I wish to report James Morgan for internet Fraud. There is a $1200 invoice currently on my PayPal account form this site Loe lust and Blood spells.

I will forward emails to Payapal saying he is going to refund me. I will also call directly to file my complaint to prevent others form getting conned by him.

Thanks,

Mary Prantil

HERE'S WHERE MARY TRIED TO RIP JAN OFF BUT FAILED. MARY IS A RIP OFF SCAM WHO LIKES TO COMMIT FRAUD. MARY LIKES TO ACCUSE OTHERS OF THIS TO THROW SUSPICION FROM HERSELF. So Much for Mary Prantil's claims of fraud & Tax Evasion on our part.

Forwarded Message:
Subj: STOP BOTHERING US

Date: 6/19/2007 8:36:31 P.M. Pacific Standard Time
From: Passionspells
To: Prant99

Mary,

your pay pal invoices were never processed-- And this is my business- James is retired. How dare you say anything about him in a derrogatory manner after he went out of his way to help you. It is only because of the grace of Divinity and casting your spell that you have been getting along with H____ as well as you have been especially after you messed up your case and sent him nasty e-mails, etc.

We just sent you an e-mail and I strongly suggest you back off. I am getting ready to forward all of your e-mails to the FBI as I write this. You have, for one thing ( just one of many) already violated Federal Internet Law.

In addition, I will report you to our cell phone company immediately for harassing phone calls and telephone stalking.

In closing here are copies of the Pay Pal invoices you NEVER paid. You sent cash, and two personal checks. Here is a copy of your e-mail stating that:

6/14/2007 2:12:54 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time
From: Prant99

Reply To:

To: Passionspells, Wizardmorgan2

I sent you 1. cash, and a 2. Citibank check and a 3. Bank of America check.

-----Original Message-----
From: Passionspells@aol.com
To: Prant99@aol.com
Sent: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 4:08 pm
Subject: Verification Needed

Dear Mary,

This is Jan writing, dear. Could you please verify your method of payment with me when you initially came in for your spell work?

I am going through all of my client records doing verification, etc. for my records.

Thank you dear, I really appreciate it.

Sincerely,
Jan

Here is a copy and paste of the pay pal invoices that you never paid. I will write pay pal and forward them all of your abusive e-mails so that they will be aware of the nonsense you have caused us. You have no credence in that matter.

From:

Janhett T. Windglows
To:

Mary Prantil (prant99@aol.com)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amount:

$1,250.54 USD
Status:

Pending
Date Requested:

May 6, 2007

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject:

Spells Invoice
Invoice
Janhett T. Windglows
passionspells@aol.com
Qty Item ID Description Unit Price Amount
1 050607 30 Day Spells Package For Mary 1,200.00 1,200.00 T

Subtotal: 1,200.00

Shipping: 46.80 T
T = 0.299%tax applied to item Tax: 3.74

Currency is in U.S. Dollars (USD) Total: $1,250.54 USD

Request Sent

From:

Janhett T. Windglows
To:

Mary Prantil (prant99@aol.com)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amount:

$500.00 USD
Status:

Pending
Date Requested:

May 8, 2007

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject:

Revised Invoice

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note:

Here is the first 500 will send the next one right after this one thanks dear

Request Sent

From:

Janhett T. Windglows
To:

Mary Prantil (prant99@aol.com)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amount:

$500.00 USD
Status:

Pending
Date Requested:

May 8, 2007

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject:

2nd one

In closing, I will now forward your e- mails to the F.B.I. for harassment, abuse, and stalking. Also your spell work is now being reversed. You should have listened to us and things would not have turned out this way for you. Perhaps you will learn a lesson from all of this, however if you do not, that is no longer our problem.

-----------------------Jan

HERE'S ONE EXAMPLE OF HOW MARY CONDUCTED HERSELF THROUGHOUT HER ENTIRE SPELL PROCESS LOL. AND SHE WONDERS WHY NO ONE LIKES HER AND OR LAUGHS AT HER LOL.

Subj: Jim - Sex spell on Hani - Disruption Spell on Tony

Date: 7/3/2007 1:37:39 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
From: Prant99
To: Wizardmorgan2
CC: Passionspells

Jim, (and Jan)

H - - - actually said he is NOT sexually attracted to me last night...H- - - - is prob mad at me too bcs I made out and kissed 2 of his friends this is one of the reason I think he is upset and fri I was a raging drunk lunatic...Fri - I was upset about the email and I started drinking around 7pm and saw H - - - - by 11pm totally wasted...then his Egyptian friends are making fun of me or so H - - - - says...it may not be true the gossip but H - - - is acting discusted with me...saying all will be OK if I just accept that...he confessed about T - - - - and the email.

T - - - - is the negative influence...For the last 2-3 weeks H- - - - has been around T - - - again now look...Please talk with Jan about these 2 spells.

Let me know.

Mary

HERE IS WHERE JAN REPORTED MARY FOR EMAIL ABUSE TO THE AOL AND YAHOO WEB MASTERS AND HAD HER BLOCKED AS A RESULT OF THEIR FINDINGS. MORE FRAUD AND HARASSMENT TO US CARRIED OUT BY MARY PRANTIL.

Subj: ABUSE

Date: 8/21/2007 4:13:33 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
From: Passionspells
To: tosreports@aol.com

I wish to report an abusive e-mail sender. I have numerous copies of her e-mails. We have blocked her from our e-mail addresses, however she continues to send us more mail under different e-mail addresses.

Her name is Mary Prantil, and she has sent to us via the following e-mail addresses:

Prant99@aol.com

mary.prantil@email.com

I have all of her contact information, home address and telephone number. I really do need this abuse from her to stop.

My other screen name is wizardmorgan2@aol.com

in which she has also been blocked from.

Sincerely,

Jan Windglows

THIS IS MARY BEGGING JAN TO TAKE HER CASE BACK AFTER SHE TOTALLY MESSED THINGS UP WITH HER GUY. AT THIS POINT WE DIDN'T WANT TO DO ANYTHING FOR MARY AND FURTHER REJECTED ANYMORE FUNDS FROM HER. WE HAD OFFERED TO REFUND HER $1,200.00 AND MOREOVER TO EAT THE COST OF HER SPELL WORK JUST TO GET RID OF HER HOWEVER SHE DECLINED THE REFUND AS YOU CAN SEE IN HER STATEMENT BELOW.

Subj: Sorry I want U on my case...$250 more 2 send T. F last phase...

Date: 6/15/2007 3:56:00 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
From: Prant99
To: Wizardmorgan2
CC: Passionspells

Jim, I am sorry for any character defect in me that has got again "reared it's ugly head". I respect you and Jan and I truly want your help. Yes. I am needy, Yes I need to let go and let Divinity. Please do not give up on me..no time is lost if we just get thru this 24 hr bump of mine. Help me please !!

I believe in you and your expertise and your morals as a caster are so pure and high.

I do not want you to send me back any money.

I want to send you the $250 discussed to complete the disruption spell with T. F. I also want you to please make H. so uncomfortable without me,,,that he can't stop thinking about me and what a great friend I am and lover. To be so sexually frusterated without me...who ever he f**ks or has a one night stand or bi-sexual 3-way with H. will think of me..how lucky he was to have my love...that he f- - - - - - it up between us not me...that he can't rest until he gets me back - even if it means leaving T.F and the office.

Are you still willing to help me?

I truly want your help - I am done today at 1pm I will call you then I can send the $250 today.

Mary
the needy brat...but lovable and willing to let go....

THIS IS WHERE I CONFERRED WITH JAN AND WE BOTH DECIDED AT THE TIME TO FULLY TERMINATE MARY'S CASE AFTER GIVING HER SEVERAL CHANCES TO STRAIGHTEN UP AND FOLLOW THE RULES. THIS IS THE LETTER WE SENT HER AFTER GOING THROUGH TWO MONTHS OF HELL WITH Miss Chaos .

Mary,

Due to you ongoing harassing to Kim, Matilda and myself, I have decided counseling with Matilda is not in anyone's best interest. I have instructed Matilda not to have any further communications with you. After I send this e-mail, I will also instruct Kim not to have any further contact with you either.

Your spell work with James and myself has been finished, and Kim is finishing your spell work that you hired her for. I paid for your counseling with Kim. Since I paid for your counseling, which I did not have to do, for some reason you think that Kim's spell work included your counseling, which it did NOT. I PAID FOR YOUR COUNSELING. The 400 that you paid Kim was FOR SPELL WORK-----NOT FOR COUNSELING. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THIS??????

I am officially ending all contact with you right after I send this e-mail. I do not want you for a client from this point on. You have exhausted all of your resources of obtaining any further help with any of us, because of your RUDE DEMANDING rebellious controlling attitude, and constantly continuing to break the rules of the spell criteria.

HOW DARE YOU SAY ANYTHING TO ME ABOUT MY HONESTY AND INTEGRITY.

JUST SO YOU KNOW AND UNDERSTAND YOUR SPELL WORK HAS BEEN DONE SO WE DID YOUR WORK THAT YOU PAID US FOR. We did even more than that----numerous boosters, and re casts also.

WE DO NOT WANT YOU FOR A CLIENT EVER AGAIN.

CONCERNING ANY FURTHER POSSIBLE COUNSELING, I DO NOT HAVE ONE SINGLE COUNSELOR THAT IS WILLING TO WORK WITH YOU. YOU ARE OBNOXIOUS, DEMANDING, AND RUDE-----THIS IS WHY ALL OF THIS HAS COME TO THIS POINT.

GOOD BYE MARY. YOU ARE BY FAR THE WORST CLIENT I HAVE EVER HAD IN ALL MY YEARS OF SPELL CASTING.

Check out the information below that tells all about Mary T. Prantil's criminal father, attorney Frank G. Prantil- that makes Mary T. Prantil GUILTY BY ASSOCIATION because she is following in her criminal father's footsteps !


 
 
 
 


CONArtist-JimMorganNOTaWizardorMagicalPowers

Park City,
Utah,
USA

SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Owner of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 WARNING: www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com PO Box #712 Idaho, Driggs, 83422 . DO NOT USE!!

#31UPDATE EX-employee responds

Sun, October 04, 2009

SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Owner of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 WARNING : www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com PO Box #712 Idaho , Driggs, 83422 . 805-455- Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  
 
SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Owner of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   Jan Windglows Will Seek REVENGE on unsatisfied customers who ask for a refund by posting blatant lies on Rip-off Report.com:   DO NOT USE: JAN WINDGLOWS or her employee James or Jim Morgan !!!!   NOT Psychics !!!   NOT Spell Casters ! Will BREACH client confidentiality and post blatant lies on the Global Internet about clients that are unhappy and want a refund.
 
WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   
 
BEWARE: 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 Con-artists/Internet Predators James Morgan and Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- BREACH CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY, NOT Spell casters or Psychics, Scam clients for money then disappear Complete Rip-off!!
 
DO NOT USE www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com .   PO Box # 712 Idaho , Driggs, 83422 . 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 James Morgan and Jan Windglows BREACH Client Confidentiality , hack into clients personal computers to take your money out of checking accounts and credit cards; Stalk clients on Internet and post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet; Will NOT cast spells; and worse James Morgan and Jan Windglows are not spell casters or psychics; once they get your money they stop answering the phone!!!!  Do not use Western Union or PayPal you will never get your money back from James Morgan and Jan Windglows. False Claims on website: NO MONEY BACK Guarantee!! Infact, Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows will retaliate and seek revenge on clients that ask for refund by posting slander, including changing and editing clients personal emails with false statements then posting on Global Internet. Truly, STAY AWAY FROM Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows WHO are sick socio-paths!!!   
 
 
 
WARNING: Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Owner of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   
 
JAN WINDGLOWS HAS BEEN RUNNING AROUND THIS RIPOFF REPORT.COM WEBSITE STATING THIS AND THAT ABOUT X-Clients that asked for a refundWHILE NOT REALLY PRODUCING ANY SOLID EVIDENCE TO THESE CLAIMS MADE BY Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan...AGAINST unhappy clients that want a refund. NO VALIDITY AND OR SUBSTANCE AT ALL TO OF THESE Slanderous CLAIMS OTHER THEN THESE CON-ARTISTS VENTING ACCUSATIONS COMING AT X-clients that are simple retaliation for exposing this   Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   
 
Here's where Jan Windglows tried to Rip-off both PayPal and clients by giving saying she gave psychic reading and that customers also wanted a spell but they didnt approve it and or Jan Windglows did not honor website offer of MONEY BACK GUARANTEE and clients never got their money back...Who is the real Fraud here I ask you? JAN WINDGLOWS OWNER OF www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 IS THE ANSWER. Jan Winglows SAYS THAT SHE Will refund the work...BUT APPARENTLY DOESN'T ACCORDING TO THIS UnHappy Customer BELOW. MAKES YOU WONDER ABOUT THE OTHER STATEMENTS THAT JAN WINDGLOWS PROFESSES.
 
 
SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows Seeks revenge post Blatant Lies about unsatisfied X-client that ask for a refund! DO NOT USE 805-455-6548.
COMPLAINT of Unhappy Customer: I've forwarded you two e-mails in regard to Jan Windglows. Yes, Jan did read for me.   The worst reading of my life TOTAL rip-off !!! During said time Jan conned me and begged me to let her a spell for me. Also I told her that I usually dont even get psychic readings..Jan wanted $5,000.00 for the type of spell saying that it was High Magic , not something simpleI want a refund to my $150 psychic reading from Jan Windglows as it was the worst of my life.pls refund my PayPal account.   I didnt want the spell and Jan Windglows said she would curse me and would reverse the spell if I didn't pay her $5000. I told her that she should get professional therapy. HERE'S WHERE JAN WINDGLOWS REPORTED CLIENTS TO PAY PAL FOR FRAUD. MY QUESTION FOR JAN WINDGLOWSIS (HOW CAN YOU STEAL SOMETHING THAT WASNT APPROVED   DOESN'T EXISTS?). THESE INVOICES WERE NEVER APPROVED To be paid. 0D Jan Windglows tried to screw up my Credit with Pay Pal account by attempting to pay her own invoices until as if it were me then saying I asked for charge back....the unhappy customer found out what Jan Windglows was doing and reported it to PayPal fraudulent activities. -----Original Message----- From: unhappycustomer to: complaint-response@paypal.com Cc: wizardmorgan2@aol.com ; passionspells@aol.com Sent: XXXXXXX Subject: Invoice20From James Morgan PayPay, I wish to report Jan Windlgows for Fraud she used my Credit Card without my permisssion and charged my Card $5000 There is a $1200 invoice currently on my PayPal account form this site Blood Love and Lust and Blood Spells...which I did not approve.
 
I didnt want the spell and Owner, Jan Windglows said she would curse me and would reverse the spell if I didn't pay her $5000. I told her that she should get professional therapy.
Thanks, Unhappy Customer of
JAN WINDGLOWS
SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Owner of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!    Will Seeks REVENGE on unsatisfied customers who ask for a refund
WARNING: Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Owner of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   
 
WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  
 
DO NOT USE www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com .   PO Box # 712 Idaho , Driggs, 83422 . 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 James Morgan and Jan Windglows BREACH Client Confidentiality , hack into clients personal computers to take your money out of checking accounts and credit cards; Stalk clients on Internet and post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet; Will NOT cast spells; and worse James Morgan and Jan Windglows are not spell casters or psychics; once they get your money they stop answering the phone!!!!  Do not use Western Union or PayPal you will never get your money back from James Morgan and Jan Windglows. False Claims on website: NO MONEY BACK Guarantee!! Infact, Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows will retaliate and seek revenge on clients that ask for refund by posting slander, including changing and editing clients personal emails with false statements then posting on Global Internet. Truly, STAY AWAY FROM Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows WHO are sick socio-paths!!!   
 
WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  
Gypsy SCUM James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows of several spell casting sites on the Global Internet including www.bloodloveandlustspells.com breach client confidentiality and are proven Internet Predators with no magical powers or wizardry.   These to Gypsy SCUM will commit DECEPTION FRAUD and IDENTITY THEFT and take clients for thousan ds and thousands of American hard earned dollars.  DO NOT USE or be RIPPED OFF by these SCUM idiots who stalk their clients and commit internet fraud by hacking into savings/checking accounts and posting personal information of clients on Global Internet. 
 
WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  
Scam Spell Casting Scheme Operation James Morgan and Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com  NOT WIZARDS- NOT PSYCHICS-NOT SPELL CASTERS !!! James/JIM Morgan and Jan Windglows have no magical powers and both are complete SCUM Rip-off Artist Scamming thousands of dollars off inn ocent CLIENTS...I know James/Jim Morgan AND Jan Windglows are complete Rip-off and Scam Artists whose only desire is to get as much money off their victims then NEVER answer their phone ever again...do not be taken by these CREEPS!!! WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  
 
DO NOT USE: FAKE Spell Casters James/Jim Morgan or Jan Windglows do not have magical powers and will only try to scam you for thousands of dollars.  
 
WARNING : Complete Spell Cast ing Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  

BEWARE - Complete Rip-off !! : 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - w ww.bloodloveandlustspells.com  or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!!  STAY AWA Y from these Internet Con-Artist !!!! Complete Scam Spell Casting Rip-off Scheme!!
 
 
BEWARE and DO NOT USE: James/Jim Morgan or Jan Windglows unless you want your money stolen from these Gypsy Scum 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224, PO Box #712 Driggs , Idaho 83422 . BREACH CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY: Do not send personal check or use Western Union or PayPal you will NEVER get your money back from James Morgan and Jan Windglows. False Claims on website: NO MONEY BACK Guarantee!! Infact, Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows will retaliate and seek revenge on clients that ask for refund by posting slander, including changing and editing clients personal emails with false statements then posting on Global Internet. Truly, STAY AWAY FROM Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows WHO are sick socio-paths!!!   
 
WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   ;
BEWARE and DO NOT USE: 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglo ws of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com .   PO Box # 712 Idaho , Driggs, 83422 . 805-455-
James/Jim Morgan and Jan W indglows: www.bloodloveandlustspells.com
 
Business phone: 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224
emails:
Jan Windglows: passionspells@aol.com
Jim Morgan: wizardmorgan2@aol.com
0A
 
"Blood Love And Lust Spells" Here are some of James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows sites to beware and not use:

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/lovespellcastings.html http://www.bloodloveandlustspell s.com/deathspells.html
 
http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/ultimatespells.html s.html http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/magicdisruption.html
 
http://www.bloodloveandlusts pells.com/removeacurse.html
 
http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/spellcastingpreviews.html
 
http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/testamonials.html
 
http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/orderaspell.html
 
http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/spellcastinginfo.html
 
WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  
 
BEWARE: 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 Con-artists James /Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com  or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: BREACH Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Intern et !!!  STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!! Complete Scam Spell Casting Rip-off Scheme!!
 
WARNING: Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   SCAM Psy chic-Jan Windglows: Owner of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   
 
Thank you Rip-off Report.com for exposing these Gypsy SCUM !!!


CONArtist-JimMorganNOTaWizardorMagicalPowers

Park City,
Utah,
USA

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists/Internet Predators James Morgan and Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com-Breach Client Confidentiality,NOT Spellcasters or Psychics,Scam clients for CASH

#31Consumer Suggestion

Tue, September 29, 2009

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists/Internet Predators James Morgan and Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com - Breach Client Confidentiality, NOT Spellcasters or Psychics, Scam clients for money then dissappear Complete Rip-off!!   DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardsmorgan2@aol.com .  PO Box #712 Idaho, Driggs, 83422. 805-455-6548 James Morgan and Jan Windglows Breach Client Confidentiality, hack into clients personal computers to take your money out of checking accounts and credit cards; Stalk clients on Internet and post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet; Will NOT cast spells; and worse James Morgan and Jan Windglows are not spell casters or psychics; once they get your money they stop answering the phone!!!!  Do not use Western Union or PayPal you will never get your money back from James Morgan and Jan Windglows.   Gypsy SCUM James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows of several spell casting sites on the Global Internet including www.bloodloveandlustspells.com breach client confidentiality and are proven Internet Predators with no magical powers or wizardry.   These to Gypsy SCUM will commit deception fraud and Identity Theft and take clients for thousands and thousands of American hard earned dollars.  DO NOT USE or be RIPPED OFF by these SCUM idiots who stalk their clients and commit internet fraud by hacking into savings/checking accounts and posting personal information of clients.    Scam James Morgan and Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com   NOT A WIZARDS- NOT PSYCHICS-NOT SPELLSCASTERS James/JIM Morgan and Jan Windglows have no magical powers and both are complete SCUM Rip-off Artist Scamming thousands of dollars off innocent CLIENTS...I know James/Jim Morgan AND Jan Windglows are complete Rip-off and Scam Artists whose only desire is to get as much money off their victims then NEVER answer his phone ever again...do not be taken by these CREEPS!!!   DO NOT USE: FAKE Spell Casters James/Jim Morgan or Jan Widnglows do not have magical powers and will only try to scam you for thousands of dollars.    BEWARE - Complete Rip-off !! : 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!!  STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!!   BEWARE and DO NOT USE: James/Jim Morgan or Jan Windglows unless you want your money stolen from you by these Gypsy Scum 805-455-6548, PO Box #712 Driggs, Idaho 83422..
James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows: www.bloodloveandlustspells.com   Business phone:805-455-6548 emails:   Jan Windglows -passionspells@aol.com James Morgan -wizardmorgan2@aol.com   BEWARE and DO NOT USE: 805-455-6548 James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com
"Blood Love And Lust Spells" Here are some of James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows sites to beware and not use:     http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/lovespellcastings.html   http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/deathspells.html   http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/ultimatespells.htmls.html   http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/magicdisruption.html   http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/removeacurse.html   http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/spellcastingpreviews.html   http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/testamonials.html   http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/orderaspell.html   http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/spellcastinginfo.html
    BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!!  STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!!   BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!!  STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!!   BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!!  STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!!   BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!!  STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist!!!!   BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!!  STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!!   BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!!  STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!!   Thank you Rip-off Report.com for exposing these GYPSY SCUM!!!      


CONArtist-JimMorganNOTaWizardorMagicalPowers

Park City,
Utah,
USA

Scam - Jim Morgan - NOT A WIZARD - NO Magical Powers Basic Con-Artist Scamming thousands of dollars off innocent people

#31

Fri, September 18, 2009

Scam - Jim Morgan - NOT A WIZARD - Jim Morgan has no magical powers and is a complete SCUM and Ripoff King and Con-Artist Scamming thousands of dollars off innocent people...I know Jim Morgan  is a complete Ripoff and Scam Artist whose only desire is to get as much money off his victims.  Then NEVER answer his phone ever again...do not be taken by this CREEP:
Do NOT USE..Jim Morgan or Jan Widnglows of Fast Acting Spells...these con artist do not have magical powers and will only try to scam you for thousands of dollars.
Here are some of Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows site to beware and not use:
Fastest Acting Black And White Dragon Magick Spell Casting ... Jim Morgan attempted to discredit me on my old site, saying the same things about ... PHYSIC READINGS TILL SHE STARTED HER SITE IN 2006 AS A SPELL CASTER . ... fastestactingblackandwhitedragonmagick spell castingservices.com/revisedpage .html - Cached - Similar

Dragon Spells
We are a highly trained professional group of skilled Spell Casters . ... Please contact James R. Morgan II & Janhett T. Windglows at: ... dragon spell s999.multiply.com/ - Cached - Similar

Blood Love And Lust Spells - Advanced Black Magick Spells By ...
" Spell Process And Spell Criteria" Hello, My name is Jim Morgan and thank you all for taking the time to ... We are Spell Casters . We are your best friends. ... www.fast-acting-black-magick-love- spell s.com/dragon spell s/ love spell rituals spell castingcriteria.html - Cached - Similar

Love Spell Reviews: www.powerful-love-spells.com
I was scammed by 5 spell casters who I am going to include on this blog as I was ... from Blood love and lust spell . i believe she works with Jim Morgan . ... love- spell -reviews.blogspot.com/.../wwwpowerful-love- spell scom.html - Cached - Similar

Strongest Banishing Magic - Strongest Love Spell Castings For Love ...
The spell can not be banished ,reversed, or nullified by any other spell caster . The spell can only be COMPLETELY removed by myself for an additional charge ... www.strongestlove spell sprotectiondeathcursehexremoval.com/ strongestbanishingmagic.html - Cached - Similar
Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows are Internet Predators that need to be arrested for Identity Theft and FRAUD.  This is guy is a complete CREEP that does death spells etc...BEWARE and do not use...unless you want to get ripped off...
Jim Morgan and Jan WindGlow- ripped me off and I tried to get my MONEY BACK - Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows do not have magical powers they are a complete ripoff!!!
THANK YOU - RIPOFF REPORT RO EXPOSING THESE RIPOFF SCUM BAGS AND SCAM ARTIST...!!!


CONArtist-JimMorganNOTaWizardorMagicalPowers

Park City,
Utah,
USA

Scam - Jim Morgan - NOT WIZARD - NO Magical Powers Basic Con-Artist Scamming thousands of dollars off innocent people

#31

Fri, September 18, 2009

Scam - Jim Morgan - NOT WIZARD - Jim Morgan has no magical powers and is a complete SCUM and Ripoff King and Con-Artist Scamming thousands of dollars off innocent people...I know Jim Morgan  is a complete Ripoff and Scam Artist whose only desire is to get as much money off his victims.  Then NEVER answer his phone ever again...do not be taken by this CREEP:
Do NOT USE..Jim Morgan or Jan Widnglows of Fast Acting Spells...these con artist do not have magical powers and will only try to scam you for thousands of dollars.
Here are some of Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows site to beware and not use:
Fastest Acting Black And White Dragon Magick Spell Casting ... Jim Morgan attempted to discredit me on my old site, saying the same things about ... PHYSIC READINGS TILL SHE STARTED HER SITE IN 2006 AS A SPELL CASTER . ... fastestactingblackandwhitedragonmagick spell castingservices.com/revisedpage .html - Cached - Similar

Dragon Spells
We are a highly trained professional group of skilled Spell Casters . ... Please contact James R. Morgan II & Janhett T. Windglows at: ... dragon spell s999.multiply.com/ - Cached - Similar

Blood Love And Lust Spells - Advanced Black Magick Spells By ...
" Spell Process And Spell Criteria" Hello, My name is Jim Morgan and thank you all for taking the time to ... We are Spell Casters . We are your best friends. ... www.fast-acting-black-magick-love- spell s.com/dragon spell s/ love spell rituals spell castingcriteria.html - Cached - Similar

Love Spell Reviews: www.powerful-love-spells.com
I was scammed by 5 spell casters who I am going to include on this blog as I was ... from Blood love and lust spell . i believe she works with Jim Morgan . ... love- spell -reviews.blogspot.com/.../wwwpowerful-love- spell scom.html - Cached - Similar

Strongest Banishing Magic - Strongest Love Spell Castings For Love ...
The spell can not be banished ,reversed, or nullified by any other spell caster . The spell can only be COMPLETELY removed by myself for an additional charge ... www.strongestlove spell sprotectiondeathcursehexremoval.com/ strongestbanishingmagic.html - Cached - Similar
Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows are Internet Predators that need to be arrested for Identity Theft and FRAUD.  This is guy is a complete CREEP that does death spells etc...BEWARE and do not use...unless you want to get ripped off...
Jim Morgan and Jan WindGlow- ripped me off and I tried to get my MONEY BACK - Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows do not have magical powers they are a complete ripoff!!!
THANK YOU - RIPOFF REPORT RO EXPOSING THESE RIPOFF SCUM BAGS AND SCAM ARTIST...!!!


James

None,
Other,
Europe

remember

#31Consumer Comment

Thu, February 26, 2009

I WOULD URGE FOLKS TO REMEMBER THERE ARE TWO SIDES TO EVERY STORY, AND IF THE MAN ISN'T TALKING THEN DON'T JUDGE HIM BECAUSE OF THAT, BEING QUITE DOES NOT ALWAY MEAN GUILTY, JUST LET THE RETARDS HAVE THEIR SAY, SOME TIMES ITS NECESSARY TO JUST SHUT UP AND SAY NOTHING, I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO COMPLAIN ABOUT. AND IF YOU GO TO THESE SERVICES REMEMBER SPELLS DO NOT ALWAYS MANIFEST AND SOME TIMES THEY CAN TAKE LONGER THEN USUAL, IF YOU DO NOT HAVE THE MONEY TO TAKE A CHANCE WITH THEN DON'T, AND IF YOU DO AND IT DOES NOT WORK FOR YOU THEN DON'T GET UPSET ITS A CHANCE YOU TAKE, NO ONE CAN GUARANTEE 100 PER CENT ONLY GOD CAN


DRAGON

Driggs,
Idaho,
U.S.A.

Ending to the Prantil. Cahill Scandal. FAKE MAGICK MAGIC SITE

#31Consumer Suggestion

Sat, February 07, 2009

I would encourage anyone interested in the out come of this scandal to visit this link of http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/280/RipOff0280918.htm. I think this will clear it all up for most, thank you. Jim Morgan


DRAGON

Driggs,
Idaho,
U.S.A.

What goes around, comes around For Mary

#31Consumer Suggestion

Sat, January 31, 2009

Miss P's deeds have finally caught up with her and she is now being investigated by the very same law enforcement agencies that she used against others in her relentless efforts to harass them. A final report will be posted concerning these investigations of Prantil upon their conclusion etc. ------ Jim Morgan


DRAGON

Driggs,
Idaho,
U.S.A.

LET THEM INVESTIGATE MARY PRANTIL

#31Consumer Comment

Thu, January 03, 2008

LET THEM INVESTIGATE MARY PRANTIL LOL. Nice to see you have a new screen name Scary


Unhappy Client

Xxx,
New York,
U.S.A.

Jim Morgan is a HARASSING Clients;posting false reports;And is being investigated by Dept of Justice

#31Consumer Comment

Sun, December 30, 2007

Jim Morgan is a HARASSING Clients; posting false reports;And is being investigated by Dept of Justice


DRAGON

Driggs,
Idaho,
U.S.A.

CRIMINAL RECORDS ON MARY T. PRANTIL Astoria NY 11106 3285 33 rd Street Apt C-2 DO NOT PERFORM SPELLS FOR MARY T. PRANTIL RIP OFF ARTIST WON'T PAY YOU

#31Consumer Comment

Fri, December 28, 2007

Mary Theresa Prantil likes to talk a lot of s**t in the way of calling everybody that disagrees with her a Thief. Con Artist. Scam Artist. Liar. Tax Evader. Criminal. Satan Worshiper. Fake.

Animal abuser and so on just to cause their good names to be tarnished and blasted over the open air ways. Mary is like a spoiled little rich girl who gets herself into allot of trouble on purpose for attention sake while knowing all the while that Daddy has always cleaned it all up for her and made everything all better.

Well, Daddy is dead now and Little Mary Prantil is still going around starting trouble for everyone however Daddy isn't around to pull her out of her crap this time. Is he Mary ?.

It looks like your going to have to clean up your own messes from now on. Huh Mary ?. It would seem that your not even that rich anymore are you ?. Not that you ever were. It was Daddy's Name and money that you were hanging on to right ?. Now, Your Nothing but a Loud Mouth living by yourself in Big Old New York because no one in California could stand to be around you. Right ?.

It would seem that Mary has a few secrets of her own that she doesn't want anyone to know about however they will be revealed just the same in the following paragraphs below.


Mary Prantil has repetitively and FALSELY accused Jan and myself of the very same things that she's in fact guilty of in reality such as Not paying her Taxes as illustrated below in her Tax Lien against her in the State Of California as can be seen below in this report.


Prantil is calling us Thieves and Con Artists however Mary has Ripped off a certain Chiropractic Center who went on to obtain a Judgment against her as shown below to which also took place in the state of California. This can be viewed at the bottom of this report under Prantil's Bankruptcy information.

Let's not forget the Spell Caster Mary just charged back on after the Caster was good enough to have performed her work for her as can be seen in one of the many other reports filed against Prantil up here on Rip Off Reports.

What about her attempted rip off against Blood Love And Lust Spells in the way of Prantil trying to charge back on invoices that were never cashed in the first place lol. Moreover, Trying to accuse Jim Morgan of ripping her off through a pay pal account that never existed. What A confused little Joke Mary's life is as she never could get the facts straight on anything.

What about all of Mary's Criminal Reports stretching from California to New York over a period of fifteen years ?. If you'll look up some of these charges through their case numbers you'll see that Miss Prantil charges range from Vandalism to Public Drunken Behavior and numerous other more serious incidents that resulted as a lack of her self control and over all disregard for the law.

Who's the Criminal here, Mary ???. Concerning Mary's accusations of Jan and myself being Satan Worshipers and the sacrificing of animals, this couldn't be further from the truth likened to the numerous other statements Mary has stated about us not only on this site and others.

If the truth be known you can find Mary's membership on a couple of different Satanic sites phrasing the Dark Forces. What's this about Mary ???. Moving On. Mary sure has moved around a lot judging from the reports below hasn't she ?. Why do you move so much Mary?.

Could it be that your trying to get clear of all the Judgments and Tax Leans against you there in the state of California by moving all the way across the country to New York ?. Possibly to get away from everyone that once knew you and about all the s**t you did in your past ?. Perhaps your running from the law its self huh Mary ?.

Mary likes to think that she's a big time Employee of Corporate America and states that she makes over $100,000.00 a year being a Secretary for HBO and previously CNN. Why is she always poor mouthing then if she's so well to do?. That is of course when she's not bad mouthing others while hiding behind the fictitious names of Honest Person. Enforcer Of Justice. Marc.

Enforcer Of Truth and so on up here. I wonder if she was fired from CNN and for what reason. If so, I wonder if they knew about her Criminal Records? That if she ever worked for HBO or CNN at all; as Mary has proved her statements in the past to be less then credible by any standers.

So, In essence what we have here is a Individual who likes to: Lie. Start Trouble. A Coward who hauls a*s when the very people she attacks throws her own s**t back in her face. A person who goes around obtaining services who has no intentions of paying for them if she can help it.

A Hypocrite. Religious Extremist who thinks she is in the service of God to Expose whomever or whatever she and her Voices consider to be Evil. A person who has no Conscience in turning false government reports in against completely innocent people and A person who has no remorse in trying to bully and ruin the lives of good people trying to assist and or help other good people in crisis.

Mary T. Prantil has stated that Jan is a l*****n, and that I am Gay on a certain comedy site, however on this same site Prantil is saying that 'Celeste is hot', and that Celeste left me because I had a small Weiner.


It would also appear that a Ex-Lover of Mary's posted a somewhat angry reply back to Mary's posting asking on this same site asking who the hell Celeste was' LOL. Could Mary Prantil be Gay herself ?. Well, She isn't with a man as far as I know or last time I spoke with her before she went crazy on us and started posting her insane statements up on Rip Off Reports.



Mary also has stated that I'm a obsessive man and that I don't know when to let it all go. I guess she doesn't like the reports that have been filed against her lol. Truth Hurts doesn't it Mary ?.

I beg to differ with you Mary T. Prantil as I feel your the extremely Obsessive one here in your repetitive calling and emailing everyone fifteen to twenty times a day trying to convey your point of view to no matter how Fuc_ed up it is. Talk about a person that doesn't know how to take 'no' for a answer or listen to and follow instructions.

Mary has even carried this Negative. Aggressive and hyper behavior out against the the very Owner of this site as well in the way of her threats and accusations against him to the tune of 15 to 20 times a day. Ed is a Good and fair Man to take this abuse and still allow her to post her insane crap up here on his site in my opinion.

So, In a nut shell: What we have here is a Nut Case in Mary T. Prantil wouldn't you say ?. Mary is not only all these things mentioned above in this posting but moreover a Loud. Arrogant. Belligerent person with a extremely obsessive and Nasty temperament to say the least.

Not in control of her emotional state, and furthermore not a credible person by any standards regarding her Criminal disposition backed up by her records below. You see Mary, This is what you get when you try to Ruin other persons lives just because your a miserable excuse for a human being that just can't get your s**t together no matter what or who tries to help you.

Not everyone will bend to your unlawful tactics. Every time you post any kind of Bull S_hit against us in the future anywhere I will re-post this page on you. Your all over the Internet now Mary concerning your postings against us here on Rip Off Report. Your Famous LOL.

The trouble in being famous is that everyone tunes in to see what all this is about. That means your Family. Friends. and Co-Workers. Employers etc. If you don't believe this then just type in your name of Mary Prantil on any search engine and it will bring you back to all of your postings against us and the postings against YOU. We want everyone to see you and what you've tried to accomplish here with your Slanderous and Defaming Postings, so keep on posting if you like.



We look forward to it. We want to EXPOSE YOU Mary T. Prantil because we believe you to be a Predator who likes to Victimize other people and companies for no apparent rhyme or reason.


We are also going to be turning in this report in depth to all the Local. State and Federal Law Enforcement Agencies. This report posting is general and there is allot more to it concerning your activities. See Yah on T.V or in prison to which ever one comes first.

Pervious address Locations:

3285 33rd St, Astoria, NY 11106

Reported:12/01/2002 251 32nd St, New York, NY 10016

Reported:07/18/2001 3285 33 Wusd # 69, Astoria, NY 11106


Reported:06/01/2001 3044 1st Ave, San Diego, CA 92103


Reported:11/13/2000 1352 PO Box, New York, NY 10150


Reported:06/18/1997 3044 Juniper St # 2, San Diego, CA 92104


Reported:10/01/1995 1154 22nd # 2, San Diego, CA 92102


Reported:12/01/1993 319 Gravilla St, La Jolla, CA 92037 Reported:08/01/1992 Criminal Court Records Criminal Profile Subject


Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Date: 12/8/2007 3:45:39 PM


Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Source State: AOCDOCCourts County: SAN DIEGO Date Reported(CA): 10/30/2006 Offense: 1 NOT SPECIFIED BY STATE Offense State: CA Offense County: SAN DIEGO Case Number: M695524


Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Source State: AOCDOCCourts County: SAN DIEGO Date Reported(CA): 10/30/2006 Offense: 1 NOT SPECIFIED BY STATE Offense State: CA Offense County: SAN DIEGO Case Number: T105836

Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Source State: AOCDOCCourts County: SAN DIEGO Date Reported(CA): 10/30/2006 Offense: 1 NOT SPECIFIED BY STATE Offense State: CA Offense County: SAN DIEGO Case Number: T108343

Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Source State: AOCDOCCourts County: SAN DIEGO Date Reported(CA): 10/30/2006 Offense: 1 NOT SPECIFIED BY STATE Offense State: CA Offense County: SAN DIEGO Case Number: T110326

Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Source State: AOCDOCCourts County: SAN DIEGO Date Reported(CA): 10/30/2006 Offense: 1 NOT SPECIFIED BY STATE Offense State: CA Offense County: SAN DIEGO Case Number: T120948 Criminal Court Records

Name: PRANTIL, MARY T Case Number: M598531 Case County: San Diego Source State: CA Case File Date: 03/23/1990


Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Case Number: M695524 Case County: San Diego Source State: CA Case File Date: 02/01/1995 Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Case Number: T105836 Case County: San Diego Source State: CA Case File Date: 11/13/1992


Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Case Number: T108343 Case County: San Diego Source State: CA Case File Date: 01/04/1993 Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Case Number: T110326 Case County: San Diego Source State: CA Case File Date: 02/02/1993


Name: PRANTIL, MARY THERESA Case Number: T120948 Case County: San Diego Source State: CA Case File Date: 08/09/1993 Bankruptcies, Tax Liens & Judgments by Name for:


Name: PRANTIL,MARY T Address: PO BOX 1352, NEW YORK NY 10150 Action: STATE TAX LIEN Court: SACRAMENTO COUNTY COURT (RD) Plaintiff: STATE OF CALIFORNIA Case: 9706100302 (06/10/1997) Liability/Assests: $1,310.00/NA


Name: PRANTIL,MARY T Address: 251 E 32ND ST #2C, NEW YORK NY 10016 Action: BANKRUPTCY Court: NEW YORK FED COURT-NEW YORK CITY (NEW YORK County) Case: 9640110 (01/11/1996) Liability/Assests: NA/NA


Name: PRANTIL,MARY T Address: 251 E 32ND ST #2C, NEW YORK NY 10016 Action: BANKRUPTCY Court: NEW YORK FED COURT-NEW YORK CITY (NEW YORK County)

Plaintiff: PRO SE Case: 9640110 (01/11/1996) Liability/Assests: NA/NA Judgement Against Name: PRANTIL,MARY T Address: 3038 DICKENS ST, SAN DIEGO CA 92106

Action: SMALL CLAIMS JUDGMENT Court: KEARNEY MESA MUNI - SAN DIEGO CO Plaintiff: LIBS CHIROPRACTOR CENTER Case: 570215 (12/19/1991)

Liability/Assests: $2,198.00/NA Celeste A. Morgan Bushnell, Florida
U.S.A.

Mary Theresa Prantil
3285 33 rd Street Apt C-2
Astoria NY 11106
Phone: 917-224-6605
Cell Phone: 917-224-6605
Email: Prant99@aol.com
Email: mprantil@aol.com
Email: mary.prantil@email.com


James Morgan

Driggs,
Idaho,
U.S.A.

MONKEY MARY Honest Lieing Person PRANTIL HERE'S THE PROOF

#31Consumer Comment

Sat, December 15, 2007

MONKEY MARY PRANTIL HERE'S THE PROOF
MARY PRANTIL HAS BEEN RUNNING AROUND THIS FORUM STATING THIS AND THAT UNDER FALSE NAMES AND PLACES WHILE NOT REALLY PRODUCING ANY SOLID EVIDENCE TO THESE SAME CLAIMS MADE BY HER AGAINST US. NO VALIDITY AND OR SUBSTANCE AT ALL TO HER CLAIMS OTHER THEN HER VENTING ACCUSATIONS COMING AT US OUT OF NOWHERE.

Here's where Mary Ripped Off Another Spell Caster By Charging Back On Them After The Worked Was Performed. More Fraud On Mary's Part. Who's The Real Fraud Here I ask you?. MARY PRANTIL WOULD BE THE ANSWER. SHE SAYS THAT SHE PAYS FOR HER WORK BUT APPARENTLY DOESN'T ACCORDING TO THIS SPELL CASTER BELOW. MAKES YOU WONDER ABOUT THE OTHER STATEMENTS THAT MARY PROFESSES AS TRUTH HUH ?.

Jan: I've forwarded you two e-mails in regard to Mary Prantil. Yes, I did read for her, also she spent over 3 1/2 hours on the phone to me. During said time she cried, cused and begged me to do a spell for her. I said that I don't usually do spells for people that I do not know.Also I told her that usually people charge 1,000.00 for the type of spell that she wanted, as that is High Magic , not something simple.

Also the first card I got for her situation was the Heirophant, follwed by the four of wands. I asked Mary if H _ _ _ _ was married , she said 'No, not my H'.

Well she begged me so many times, interrupted my other business, called at all hours. she cried so much to me. I finally gave in and said I'd do the spell. Then she bargined with me to do it for 800.00. Later she said that she had soooo many bills and could I do it for 500.00.

I did it .It worked immediately, as her e-mail proves. Then she found out that H---- is a drug addict and that he is married and has several other girlfriends. I told her it was a moral choice, she admitted that in the past she 'was no angel' with Jans service when I ask her what happened. She charged me back on her credit card with Paypal and tryed to claim that the 'merchandise' was not the quality that she expected.

I said I would reverse the spell if she didn't pay me, I told her that she should get professional therapy and I even arranged free drug counseling for her boy friend; all of which she refused. I sent her a photo of part of the spell and a paper tailsman as proof that I performed the service.

HERE'S WHERE MARY REPORTED JIM MORGAN TO PAY PAL FOR FRAUD. MY QUESTION FOR MARY IS (HOW CAN YOU STEAL SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EXISTS?). THESE INVOICES WERE NEVER PAID BY MARY PRANTIL TO START WITH LOL.

Mary Prantil tried to screw up Jan's Pay Pal account by attempting to pay her own invoices until Jan found out what she was doing and informed pay pal as to Prantil's fraudulent activities. Prantil was going to pay off on her own invoices only to cancel them OUT soon after so she could place a claim of Fraud against Jim Morgan on this account. Again, Jim Morgan doesn't even own the company nor does he have anything to do with the administrative functions of this company such as receiving monies for anything especially spell work.

Of course Pay Pal laughed at this little Prantil Con Game and Denied Prantil's fraudulent claims against us. Mary also was confused in the way that she was trying to report Jim Morgan to pay pal for running and or owning a company to which he has no connections to other then helping out with the counseling part of the operation to which he doesn't get paid for.

See how miss-informed Mary Is. Basically what Mary was trying to do was get her work performed for free by paying Jan with checks and then attempting to get her money back for these cashed checks through pay pal. Notice where this email originated from below and who it was sent to under the original message heading. To those of you that know how to check IP Addresses this should clear up any doubts that this is her actual communication to pay pal. So Much for Mary Prantil's claims of fraud & Tax Evasion on our part.

-----Original Message-----
From: m prantil
To: complaint-response@paypal.com
Cc: wizardmorgan2@aol.com; passionspells@aol.com
Sent: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:12 pm
Subject: Invoice From James Morgan


PayPay,

I wish to report James Morgan for internet Fraud. There is a $1200 invoice currently on my PayPal account form this site Loe lust and Blood spells.

I will forward emails to Payapal saying he is going to refund me. I will also call directly to file my complaint to prevent others form getting conned by him.

Thanks,

Mary Prantil


HERE'S WHERE MARY TRIED TO RIP JAN OFF BUT FAILED. MARY IS A RIP OFF SCAM WHO LIKES TO COMMIT FRAUD. MARY LIKES TO ACCUSE OTHERS OF THIS TO THROW SUSPICION FROM HERSELF. So Much for Mary Prantil's claims of fraud & Tax Evasion on our part.


Forwarded Message:
Subj: STOP BOTHERING US
Date: 6/19/2007 8:36:31 P.M. Pacific Standard Time
From: Passionspells
To: Prant99


Mary,

your pay pal invoices were never processed-- And this is my business- James is retired. How dare you say anything about him in a derrogatory manner after he went out of his way to help you. It is only because of the grace of Divinity and casting your spell that you have been getting along with H____ as well as you have been especially after you messed up your case and sent him nasty e-mails, etc.

We just sent you an e-mail and I strongly suggest you back off. I am getting ready to forward all of your e-mails to the FBI as I write this. You have, for one thing ( just one of many) already violated Federal Internet Law.

In addition, I will report you to our cell phone company immediately for harassing phone calls and telephone stalking.

In closing here are copies of the Pay Pal invoices you NEVER paid. You sent cash, and two personal checks. Here is a copy of your e-mail stating that:


6/14/2007 2:12:54 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time
From: Prant99


Reply To:
To: Passionspells, Wizardmorgan2


I sent you 1. cash, and a 2. Citibank check and a 3. Bank of America check.

-----Original Message-----
From: Passionspells@aol.com
To: Prant99@aol.com
Sent: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 4:08 pm
Subject: Verification Needed


Dear Mary,


This is Jan writing, dear. Could you please verify your method of payment with me when you initially came in for your spell work?

I am going through all of my client records doing verification, etc. for my records.

Thank you dear, I really appreciate it.


Sincerely,
Jan


Here is a copy and paste of the pay pal invoices that you never paid. I will write pay pal and forward them all of your abusive e-mails so that they will be aware of the nonsense you have caused us. You have no credence in that matter.

From:
Janhett T. Windglows
To:
Mary Prantil (prant99)

-----------------

Amount:
$1,250.54 USD
Status:
Pending
Date Requested:
May 6, 2007

-------------------
Subject:
Spells Invoice
Invoice
Janhett T. Windglows
passionspells@aol.com
Qty Item ID Description Unit Price Amount
1 050607 30 Day Spells Package For Mary 1,200.00 1,200.00 T
Subtotal: 1,200.00
Shipping: 46.80 T
T = 0.299%tax applied to item Tax: 3.74
Currency is in U.S. Dollars (USD) Total: $1,250.54 USD


Request Sent


From:
Janhett T. Windglows
To:
Mary Prantil (prant99@aol.com)

-----------------------

Amount:
$500.00 USD
Status:
Pending
Date Requested:
May 8, 2007

----------------------
Subject:
Revised Invoice

---------------------

Note:
Here is the first 500 will send the next one right after this one thanks dear

Request Sent

From:
Janhett T. Windglows
To:
Mary Prantil (prant99@aol.com)

----------------------
Amount:
$500.00 USD
Status:
Pending
Date Requested:
May 8, 2007

---------------------
Subject:
2nd one

In closing, I will now forward your e- mails to the F.B.I. for harassment, abuse, and stalking. Also your spell work is now being reversed. You should have listened to us and things would not have turned out this way for you. Perhaps you will learn a lesson from all of this, however if you do not, that is no longer our problem.

-----------------------Jan


HERE'S ONE EXAMPLE OF HOW MARY CONDUCTED HERSELF THROUGHOUT HER ENTIRE SPELL PROCESS LOL. AND SHE WONDERS WHY NO ONE LIKES HER AND OR LAUGHS AT HER LOL.

Subj: Jim - Sex spell on Hani - Disruption Spell on Tony
Date: 7/3/2007 1:37:39 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
From: Prant99
To: Wizardmorgan2
CC: Passionspells



Jim, (and Jan)

H - - - actually said he is NOT sexually attracted to me last night...H- - - - is prob mad at me too bcs I made out and kissed 2 of his friends this is one of the reason I think he is upset and fri I was a raging drunk lunatic...Fri - I was upset about the email and I started drinking around 7pm and saw H - - - - by 11pm totally wasted...then his Egyptian friends are making fun of me or so H - - - - says...it may not be true the gossip but H - - - is acting discusted with me...saying all will be OK if I just accept that...he confessed about T - - - - and the email.

T - - - - is the negative influence...For the last 2-3 weeks H- - - - has been around T - - - again now look...Please talk with Jan about these 2 spells.

Let me know.

Mary



HERE IS WHERE JAN REPORTED MARY FOR EMAIL ABUSE TO THE AOL AND YAHOO WEB MASTERS AND HAD HER BLOCKED AS A RESULT OF THEIR FINDINGS. MORE FRAUD AND HARASSMENT TO US CARRIED OUT BY MARY PRANTIL.


Subj: ABUSE
Date: 8/21/2007 4:13:33 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
From: Passionspells
To: tosreports@aol.com



I wish to report an abusive e-mail sender. I have numerous copies of her e-mails. We have blocked her from our e-mail addresses, however she continues to send us more mail under different e-mail addresses.

Her name is Mary Prantil, and she has sent to us via the following e-mail addresses:

Prant99@aol.com

mary.prantil@email.com

I have all of her contact information, home address and telephone number. I really do need this abuse from her to stop.

My other screen name is wizardmorgan2@aol.com

in which she has also been blocked from.

Sincerely,

Jan Windglows

THIS IS MARY BEGGING JAN TO TAKE HER CASE BACK AFTER SHE TOTALLY MESSED THINGS UP WITH HER GUY. AT THIS POINT WE DIDN'T WANT TO DO ANYTHING FOR MARY AND FURTHER REJECTED ANYMORE FUNDS FROM HER. WE HAD OFFERED TO REFUND HER $1,200.00 AND MOREOVER TO EAT THE COST OF HER SPELL WORK JUST TO GET RID OF HER HOWEVER SHE DECLINED THE REFUND AS YOU CAN SEE IN HER STATEMENT BELOW.

Subj: Sorry I want U on my case...$250 more 2 send T. F last phase...
Date: 6/15/2007 3:56:00 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
From: Prant99
To: Wizardmorgan2
CC: Passionspells


Jim, I am sorry for any character defect in me that has got again 'reared it's ugly head'. I respect you and Jan and I truly want your help. Yes. I am needy, Yes I need to let go and let Divinity. Please do not give up on me..no time is lost if we just get thru this 24 hr bump of mine. Help me please !!

I believe in you and your expertise and your morals as a caster are so pure and high.
I do not want you to send me back any money.

I want to send you the $250 discussed to complete the disruption spell with T. F. I also want you to please make H. so uncomfortable without me,,,that he can't stop thinking about me and what a great friend I am and lover. To be so sexually frusterated without me...who ever he f**ks or has a one night stand or bi-sexual 3-way with H. will think of me..how lucky he was to have my love...that he f- - - - - - it up between us not me...that he can't rest until he gets me back - even if it means leaving T.F and the office.

Are you still willing to help me?

I truly want your help - I am done today at 1pm I will call you then I can send the $250 today.

Mary
the needy brat...but lovable and willing to let go....


THIS IS WHERE I CONFERRED WITH JAN AND WE BOTH DECIDED AT THE TIME TO FULLY TERMINATE MARY'S CASE AFTER GIVING HER SEVERAL CHANCES TO STRAIGHTEN UP AND FOLLOW THE RULES. THIS IS THE LETTER WE SENT HER AFTER GOING THROUGH TWO MONTHS OF HELL WITH Miss Chaos .

Mary,


Due to you ongoing harassing to Kim, Matilda and myself, I have decided counseling with Matilda is not in anyone's best interest. I have instructed Matilda not to have any further communications with you. After I send this e-mail, I will also instruct Kim not to have any further contact with you either.

Your spell work with James and myself has been finished, and Kim is finishing your spell work that you hired her for. I paid for your counseling with Kim. Since I paid for your counseling, which I did not have to do, for some reason you think that Kim's spell work included your counseling, which it did NOT. I PAID FOR YOUR COUNSELING. The 400 that you paid Kim was FOR SPELL WORK-----NOT FOR COUNSELING. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THIS??????

I am officially ending all contact with you right after I send this e-mail. I do not want you for a client from this point on. You have exhausted all of your resources of obtaining any further help with any of us, because of your RUDE DEMANDING rebellious controlling attitude, and constantly continuing to break the rules of the spell criteria.

HOW DARE YOU SAY ANYTHING TO ME ABOUT MY HONESTY AND INTEGRITY.

JUST SO YOU KNOW AND UNDERSTAND YOUR SPELL WORK HAS BEEN DONE SO WE DID YOUR WORK THAT YOU PAID US FOR. We did even more than that----numerous boosters, and re casts also.

WE DO NOT WANT YOU FOR A CLIENT EVER AGAIN. CONCERNING ANY FURTHER POSSIBLE COUNSELING, I DO NOT HAVE ONE SINGLE COUNSELOR THAT IS WILLING TO WORK WITH YOU. YOU ARE OBNOXIOUS, DEMANDING, AND RUDE-----THIS IS WHY ALL OF THIS HAS COME TO THIS POINT.

Respond to this Report!