Report: #283829

Complaint Review: Jim Morgan - bloodloveandlustspells.com

Jim Morgan - Jan Windglows - bloodloveandlustspells.com Jim Morgan, SpellCaster Scam Artists, and Jan Windglows ripped me off:DO NOT USE -bloodloveandlustspells.com Driggs Idaho

Reported By:

— Phoenix Arizona
Submitted:

Fri, November 09, 2007
Updated:

Thu, April 19, 2012

Jim Morgan - bloodloveandlustspells.com

P.O. Box # 712

Driggs, Idaho

U.S.A.
Phone:

208-639-2224
Category:

Astrologers & Psychics

Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows are unethical spell casters. They work together in crime. Jan pretend to be a psychic readers but she is not even close to being accurate. Jan does not give you a psychic reading but only manipulates you and suggest multiple spells to purchase from Jim Morgan on Bloodloveandlustspells.com. After they take your money they tried to pawn me off to another caster for counseling whic is a false claim because they do not provide the services that they claim on their site - 24/7 counseling, NRP counseling and psychic readings.

Jim and Jan flat out stole money from me and should go to jail for Fraud and tax evasion. I made the mistake a of using Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows for spell casting...He did not provide me with a photo of the spell which means he di dnot perform it....Jim made me pay thru Western Union to not trace his whereabouts, Jim admitted to me that he was committing tax evasion by not reporting his earnings...and Jim was proud of it...in short Jim hussled me for my money and is commiting both Tax evasion AND fraud..

I have since found God. I reported all of this to the IRS with my Western Union reciepts for several thousand of dollars and I hope that there will be a Class Action case against once more people come forward with similiar stoires of fraud. bloodloveandlustspells.com/.

Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows will eventually go to jail for FRAUD!!

Enforcer of justice
Phoenix, Arizona
U.S.A.

44 Updates & Rebuttals

High Enchantress Jan Windglows

Internet,
USA

Jan Windglows & Jim Morgan SUE Career Criminal Mary Prantil of NYC For Stalking, Harrassment, Slander, Liabel, Extortion Crimes READ THE LAWSUIT On SCAM LIAR CRIMINAL Mary Prantil AKA "AmericasDreamer

#45Consumer Comment

Thu, April 19, 2012

READ THE LAWSUIT ON MARY PRANTIL AKA "PSYCHICNSEATTLE" VIA THIS LINK: http://www.mary-prantil.com/readlawsuithere.html

Report Attachments:

PsychicINSeattle

Tacoma,
Washington,
United States of America

April 18, 2012 SCAM Alert: Spellcaster Jan Windglows aka Janhet Windglows operates many FAKE SCAM on-line websites to steal your money like www.bloodloveandlustspells.com STOP Jan Windglows.

Mike Cahill, Spell Caster says: SCAM Jan Windglows is the LAZIEST Con-artist - her Spells do not work bcs Jan Windglows just takes MONEY form Payapl or Western Union so you can't find her and Jan Windglows gets away with DECEPTION FRAUD.

Kim Thrasher employees says: It's true Jan Windglows just scams for MONEY and does no work. Clients complaint to me all the time.

SCAM Jan Windglows most hated on-line Con-Artist. DO NOT LET SCAM JAN WINDGLOWS rip you off!!!

Report Attachments:

do not tread on me

Astoria,
New York,
USA

Mary Prantil Lies Does Not Prove Her Statements

#45Consumer Comment

Fri, July 30, 2010

Hello to all who read this- this is Enchantress Jan Windglows, owner and successful entrepreneur of my beautiful web site, www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

The person above posting against us on the Internet is a deluded woman from New York facing a lot of criminal charges, named Mary Prantil.

We expect her to be thrown in jail this October hopefully sooner. She is a liar and blabber mouth, as everyone can see, and a garbage mouth as well.

Every time she emails or calls us, we simply send her threatening emails and phone calls to the attorney in New York currently prosecuting her.

Mary Prantil is our "pet psycho" so to speak. Hello, Mary ! My husband James and I are here in Bonners Ferry Idaho, anyone can call us- our phone number is 208-714-4348, just like it says on our web sites.

Mary would LOVE to have our home residential address so she can make more trouble for us, but that will never happen. This is precisely why business owners have post office boxes- to avoid psychotic people like Mary of course, LOL.

You see, Mary is MAD because when we did her spell work, the spells WORKED, her boyfriend wanted to marry her, and then Mary messed up and drove her boyfriend off, and she has been blaming all her messed up agenda on us ever since.

She also has some kind of psychotic thing going where she makes up outlandish stories about other people about the same things that are happening in HER life, lol. The woman needs to be put away, committed, locked up for the rest of her life. She is 46 years old and still all she can do is try to make trouble for innocent people.

My husband James spent countless hours on the phone helping this woman. She did receive her spell results. She messed up her life. Oh, well ! I have no control over what this crazy woman did to her own life and we will not back down from her and will continue to help put her behind bars.

So in closing, Mary is a very unhappy person, constantly blaming her own self adversities on innocent other people. And my husband and I are not the only ones- Mary Prantil has SEVERAL people in New York that have pressed charges on her and are waiting for her to be prosecuted.

For future reference, my husband and I will continue to run our very reputable and innocent highly successful business and continnue to defend ourselves, no matter WHAT Mary Prantil says.

We know who we are, and we know who Mary Prantil is.

Give me a call if any questions. By the way, I see Mary had to actually write a long story of lies about me since she did a background check and could not find anything on MY record, lol.

Mary Prantil certainly has PLENTY of garbage racked up against her huh? Just think here is a woman 46 years old that will never be a responsible adult or lead a positive productive life. But that is her problem now, and she has Divinity to answer for, for all her misdeeds and her many lies and crimes.

The comical thing about all of this is, nobody CARES what Mary Prantil writes or says. She is a liar and nobody or any of my cleints EVER ask me who Mary Prantil even IS.

All the stories that Prantil fabricates about us are garbage, as we have stated many times. My husband and I are very successful honest people and we are not ruffled by anything Mary Prantil says because all she is doing at this point is taking up bandwidth that someone else who has something important to say could be using up here, lol.

Concerning my home address- Mary is the reason I will never disclose my residential address. I do not need her crazy as_ showing up in my neighborhood, LOL. Anyone reading these threads would feel the same.

Take care and be blessed everyone, call me and come visit my website I have nothing to hide, lol. Come and see the new beautiful altar my husband James and I have built to bring glory to Divinity.

In Divinity's Service,
Enchantress Janhett T. Windglows
www.bloodloveandlustspells.com
208-714-4348

This report is concerning Frank George Prantil and his daughter Mary Theresa Prantil. In past reports authored by Miss Prantil, she has stated that " I'm proud to have been the daughter of Frank G. Prantil" and that she again "comes from a "PRESTIGIOUS" family based in the San Diego there in the state of California.

I can't speak for the character of the rest of her family as I don't personally know them however, I have no reason to believe them to be anything other then reasonable and law abiding people however, I can relay what I've read from credible sources such as transcripts from the Supreme Court, Colleges of Frank Prantil, Attorney Generals office, State Attorneys office legal sites etc pertaining to Frank G. Prantil.

Miss Prantil has stated that "My father got off lots of criminals" then latter went on to say: "My father got off lots of criminals and innocent people to", LOL. Well, I'm sure he did successfully defend some innocent people along the way but from the looks of it, he also was instrumental in successfully defending the trash of society such as Murders, Child Molesters, Check Forgers, Bank Robbers etc. Upon researching the records and past legal performance of Mr. Prantil, I was also informed that not only was he successful in defending the scum of humanity on several occasions but went on to be completely corrupted by the same criminals that he had been representing throughout his practice.

It was in my research sited below, did I run across several charges launched against Frank G. Prantil via the Supreme and Superior court system there in California, such infractions as Perjury, Drug Poisson, Drug Abuse, Unlawfully removing $700,000 from a Clients safe as she sat in jail awaiting a murder trial and so fourth. Mr. Prantil also had interfered with the homicide trial by becoming personally involved with his Client of that same murder trial by attempting to cover for the accused so he could recover his fees. Prantil lied blatantly on several occasions and attempted to hold up the due process of law by filling one frivolous motion of delay right after another just like Mary in the current charges being lodged against her by the State of New York.

Frank Prantil was known as a greedy individual who would stop at nothing to accomplish his goals be they of a positive or unethical nature, JUST LIKE Mary T. Prantil his daughter, He was considered out spoken, brazened, and ruthless just like his daughter Mary T. Prantil Internet Terrorist Extraordinaire. So in essence and according to other legal professionals, Frank Prantil was nothing but a GREEDY UNETHICAL Attorney that happened to like the spotlight just like Mary. Another thing I'd like to add here. Did you know that Frank G. Prantil was in and out of rehab centers for his uncontrolled use of illegal narcotics ?, Did you know that he was imprisoned for 14 months for not only botching a homicide trial, but for being an Accomplice to check FORGERY in the commission of that crime.

As you can read in the research below, Mr. Prantil wasn't considered a professional on any level by the courts or his peers. Mr. Prantil was DISBARRED twice for drug, unethical activity, and leaving his Clients holding the bag simply because they ran out of money in the middle of their defense. Does any of this sound familiar ?, Does it sound like anything Miss Mary T. Prantil has done in the past ?, I would say that Little Mary is the preverbal apple that didn't fall very far from the tree, wouldn't you say ? Well, Frank Prantil won't be bothering, SCAMMING, or ripping off his Clients any more because he's now deceased. Good Riddance I say.

Now, we have little Mary carrying on his legacy with all of her criminal activities such as you can view below after her fathers information. Please view the facts below coming from the Experts and those that had the misfortune of dealing with him first hand. Sounds like a real Gypsy Scum Ball to me. Read the history of this Idiot and be SHOCKED and then read about the exploits of his daughter little miss marry low life prantil, people like this should just be locked away forever and kept from wasting the courts time and resources.

High Court Closes Book on Colorful Legal Career

SAN DIEGO At Largehttp://articles.latimes.com/1989-03-31/local/me-603_1_high-court

March 31, 1989|ANTHONY PERRY

The California Supreme Court has quietly ended one of San Diego County's more clamorous legal careers.

The court this month upheld the disbarment of Frank George Prantil, a well-known attorney and aspiring politician before being convicted of perjury and forgery charges and spending 14 months in prison.

"At one time, he was considered one of the county's top defense attorneys," said attorney Eugene Iredale, who once represented Prantil. "Somehow his life just fell apart on him."

Now living outside Sacramento, the 51-year-old Prantil said he was "devastated" by the court's rejection of his plea that he was unfairly convicted. And he repeated his oft-made accusation that he was victimized because of his maverick ways.

"I'm a victim of the war on drugs," Prantil said. "The prosecutors and the courts can't stand it when someone insists that all defendants have rights."

In nearly two decades as a practicing attorney, the San Diego native was never far from the headlines. He won several high-publicity felony cases and big-money damage suits. He defended a San Diego councilman indicted in the Yellow Cab scandal.

Reporters loved his flamboyant rhetoric (he favored Shakespeare and the classics) and brash attire (he wore an American flag tie to court). His practice boomed. He moved from East County to a comfortable spread in La Jolla.

But there were also political defeats, angry public disputes, money problems and his final slide into Vacaville state prison. He concedes now that alcohol and marijuana played a role in his difficulties.

He lost races for Congress (1968), district attorney (1970) and El Cajon Municipal Court (1978). The County Bar Assn. branded him as unqualified. The State Bar in 1979 suspended him for six months for misusing a client's money.

He was convicted in 1983 of forgery and perjury in a case involving a bogus $53,000 check and, in 1986, of being an accessory to a cocaine conspiracy. Released from prison in 1987, Prantil says he will never return to San Diego County: "They rode me out on a rail."

He says that Deputy Dist. Atty. Bob Sullivan had a vendetta against him. Sullivan says that's bunk and notes that two juries convicted Prantil on a number of counts.

From his self-imposed exile, Prantil tries not to dwell on how far he has fallen. "I used to believe in ultimate justice," he said. "I don't anymore."

A Winning T-Shirt

T-shirts protesting the judge's decision will go on sale today in 14 San Diego County outlets of Pacific Eyes and T's, the Sorrento Valley-based T-shirt and sunglasses chain.

The new shirts show a Conner-like catamaran with a large screw through it, and a kiwi bird laughing at the sight. Price: $10.

Pacific Eyes and T's has long backed Conner against pirate-banker Michael Fay. During the September races it sold shirts saying "No Way Fay", and "Throw Another Kiwi on the Barbie."

A Well-Done Roast

In Pete Wilson's latter years as mayor of San Diego, it was said he had two goals: to learn to sing and to become governor.

He took lessons and can manfully handle a tune. The second goal eluded him, and he settled for the U. S. Senate. Now, he's trying to rectify that with his third try at the governorship, with his likely Democratic foe being Atty. Gen. John Van de Kamp.

Thursday night the Republican Wilson was among those roasting Assembly Speaker Willie Brown (D-San Francisco) at a benefit dinner in Oakland.

He joked that he wasn't surprised to find picketers carrying signs urging him to stay in the Senate. What did surprise him, he said, was that one of the signs was carried by Van de Kamp.

==========================================================================================

http://ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/843/843.F2d.314.86-6669.html

http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/search?q=Frank+George+Prantil&circuit=

PUBLIC RECORDS http://public.resource.org/
843 F.2d 314

Frank George PRANTIL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 86-6669.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 23, 1987*.
Memorandum Jan. 4, 1988.
Order and Opinion March 31, 1988.

Frank G. Prantil, Fair Oaks, Cal., pro se.

M. Howard Wayne, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Diego, Cal., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.

Before CHOY, FARRIS and HALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1
Frank George Prantil, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court's summary dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254.

I.

2
Prantil, formerly an attorney in California, was introduced to Daryl Bell by his client Melvin Goins. Prantil agreed to represent Bell on a criminal charge. A few weeks later a woman purporting to be Bell's mother asked Prantil to help her negotiate an escrow check from which Prantil would receive his fee. Prantil accompanied the woman to his bank where he informed the teller that the woman was his client's mother and that he wanted to deposit the check into his trust account. The woman signed the check, which was made payable to Joanna F. McKnight, and Prantil endorsed it to his trust account. Neither Prantil nor the woman indicated that the check might not be genuine.

3
Subsequently, the owner of an escrow agency discovered that three checks were missing from her office. One of the checks had been made out to Joanna F. McKnight and deposited in Prantil's account. The agent's signature had been forged on the check.

4
Prantil was charged with forgery in violation of Section 470 of the California Penal Code. At trial, Prantil argued he knew nothing of the forgery, and that he had deposited the check merely for collection purposes to see whether it was genuine.To establish that Prantil knew the escrow check was forged, the prosecution introduced evidence concerning four trust deeds which Prantil had prepared. Prantil had received information suggesting that the four deeds were forged and that Goins and Bell, were responsible for the forgeries.

5
Prantil was convicted of forgery and sentenced to two years in prison. The California Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. People v. Prantil, 169 Cal.App.3d 592, 215 Cal.Rptr. 372 (1985). The California Supreme Court denied review and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. Prantil v. California, 475 U.S. 1067, 106 S.Ct. 1381, 89 L.Ed.2d 606 (1986).1

6
Prantil filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court. The district court summarily denied the petition. This court granted Prantil's application for a certificate of probable cause.2

II.

7
Prantil contends that numerous trial court errors and a district court delay in deciding his habeas petition denied him due process.

8
This court reviews de novo a district court's denial of a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987). This court presumes the state court's findings of fact to be correct. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254(d).

III.

9
Prantil contends he was denied due process because the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to establish that he passed the forged escrow check "as true and genuine."3

10
This court determines whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).

11
The evidence established that Prantil received information prior to the transaction which suggested that Goins and Bell were involved in a forgery scheme. He also knew that one of the possible victims of the scheme was Joanna McKnight, who was described to him as an elderly woman between the ages of 78 and 80. Yet, despite this knowledge, when Prantil deposited the escrow check into his trust account he did not inform the teller that the check might be a forgery or that the woman with him, who appeared to be approximately 40 to 45 years of age, might not be the person whose name appeared on the check. He merely endorsed the check and asked that it be deposited into his account.

12
Prantil's knowledge of the previous forgeries and the contradictory descriptions of McKnight could have led the jury to reasonably conclude that by failing to alert the bank, Prantil was attempting to pass the check "as true and genuine." See People v. Williams, 186 Cal.App.2d 420, 424, 8 Cal.Rptr. 871, 873 (1960) (tender of check purporting to be signed by specific person established "true and genuine" requirement). Thus, the district court did not err in the determining there was sufficient evidence for a rational trier of fact to find that the "true and genuine" requirement was established beyond a reasonable doubt.

IV.

13
Prantil contends that the trial court deprived him of due process by giving two erroneous jury instructions.

14
This court evaluates jury instructions "in the context of the overall charge to the jury as a component of the entire trial process." Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1239 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 838, 105 S.Ct. 137, 83 L.Ed.2d 77 (1984). To warrant habeas relief, the instruction cannot be merely "undesirable, erroneous, or even 'universally condemned,' " but must violate some due process right guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment. Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. 141, 146, 94 S.Ct. 396, 400, 38 L.Ed.2d 368 (1973). Moreover, the petitioner in a habeas proceeding has the burden of demonstrating that an erroneous instruction "so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process." Darnell v. Swinney, 823 F.2d 299, 301 (9th Cir.1987), petition for cert. filed, (Oct. 1, 1987).

15
Prantil challenges the trial court's instruction regarding the elements of forgery. He contends that by omitting the "true and genuine" requirement, the trial court denied him his due process right to have the jury consider each element of the charged offense. See Connecticut v. Johnson, 460 U.S. 73, 87-88, 103 S.Ct. 969, 978, 74 L.Ed.2d 823 (1983) (instruction on presumption of intent reversible error because permitted jury to convict defendant without examining evidence concerning essential element of crime).

16
The trial court gave the following instructions on the elements of forgery:

17
Now, in order to prove the commission of such crime [forgery], each of the following elements must be proved, each of them. Here we go.

18
Number one, that a person passed or offered to pass a forged instrument. That is the first one.

19
Two that such person knew that the instrument was forged; and three, that such person passed or offered to pass such instrument with the specific intent to defraud another person or persons.

20
Although the instruction omitted the "true and genuine" requirement, we consider the instruction in conjunction with the other instructions. See Bashor, 730 F.2d at 1239. Prior to giving the challenged instruction the court told the jury:

21
Now, every person with the specific intent to defraud--now, remember that I told you 'specific intent.' That's it. That's specific intent--with the specific intent to defraud another, utters, publishes, passes or attempts to pass or make use--there's a lot of things here--or make use of, as true and genuine, any false, altered, forged or counterfeited instrument or document, knowing the same to be false, altered, forged or counterfeited, is guilty of the crime of forgery. (emphasis added)

22
Because the overall charge to the jury informed them of the true and genuine requirement, Prantil was not denied his due process right to have the jury consider every element of the crime.

23
Prantil also contends he was denied due process because the trial court gave an inapplicable and erroneous jury instruction on aiding and abetting. Prantil argues that the accomplice instruction removed an issue of intent from the jury's consideration and thus constituted reversible error under the reasoning of Johnson and Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S.Ct. 2450, 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979).

24
However, the prosecutor specifically denied that Prantil could be guilty as an aider and abettor instead of as a principal. An erroneous jury instruction does not merit habeas relief if the deficiencies pertain to matters that are not in dispute and the error did not so affect the entire trial as to deprive the defendant of due process.See Darnell, 823 F.2d at 302-03. The trial court gave proper instructions regarding the intent necessary to convict Prantil as a principal to the forgery. Because the prosecution did not present an accomplice theory, any deficiencies went to a matter that was not in dispute. The error did not mislead the jury on a disputed issue and thus did not so infect the trial as to deprive Prantil of due process. Id.

V.

25
Prantil contends that the trial court denied him due process by refusing to grant judicial use immunity to a potentially exonerating witness.

26
On his motion for a new trial, Prantil claimed that Goins could testify that Goins and Bell had set up Prantil, that Prantil was unaware that the check was stolen, and that Bell had lied to Prantil when he said there were criminal charges pending against him. Goins had been unavailable to testify at the trial because he was in prison on an unrelated charge. At the new trial hearing Goins invoked the privilege against self-incrimination and refused to testify at the trial unless he received judicial use immunity because he was in prison on an unrelated charge. The court denied Prantil's motion to grant immunity to Goins.

27
Under California law, a court may only grant immunity on the prosecutor's request. Cal. Penal Code Sec. 1324. See In re Weber, 11 Cal.3d 703, 720, 523 P.2d 229, 240, 114 Cal.Rptr. 429, 440 (1974). However, the prosecution's failure to request immunity violated Prantil's due process rights if it deprived him of his right to a fair trial. See United States v. Garner, 663 F.2d 834, 839 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 905, 102 S.Ct. 1750, 72 L.Ed.2d 161 (1982).

28
Here, Prantil's unsupported assertion is the only indication that Goins would have presented exculpatory testimony had he been granted immunity. The record contains overwhelming evidence that Prantil was not an unwitting accomplice in the crime, much of which would not be controverted by Goins' testimony even if that testimony is as Prantil contends it would be. For example, Prantil knew that the woman who deposited the check in his account did not match the description of the woman whose name appeared on the check. On these facts, we hold that Prantil was not deprived of a fair trial. If Prantil was denied a fair trial in this case, trial courts would be required to grant immunity simply on the basis of unsupported allegations by criminal defendants that immunity is required by due process.

29
Moreover, Prantil has made no showing that any misconduct on the part of the prosecutor caused Goins to invoke his privilege against self-incrimination. See United States v. Lord, 711 F.2d 887, 890-92 (9th Cir.1983).

VI.

30
Prantil contends he was denied due process because of a twenty-month delay between the date of the alleged crime and the date of the indictment.

31
A pre-indictment delay, unlike a delay in bringing a charged defendant to trial, is "tested by general proscriptions of due process."4 Arnold v. McCarthy, 566 F.2d 1377, 1381 (9th Cir.1978). A pre-indictment delay does not justify habeas relief unless the defendant can show actual prejudice. Id. at 1382. To prove actual prejudice a defendant must give more than "mere assertions that ... witnesses' memories may have faded with the passage of time...." United States v. Horowitz, 756 F.2d 1400, 1405 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 822, 106 S.Ct. 74, 88 L.Ed.2d 60 (1985).

32
Prantil contends that he suffered actual prejudice because the bank teller could no longer remember the details of the escrow check transaction. However, the state court of appeals found that the delay did not affect the teller's memory. In addition, the court noted that Prantil was benefited by the teller's unresponsiveness to certain questions; therefore there was no prejudice.

33
Prantil also claims that a seven-month delay between the time he filed his habeas petition and the time the district court dismissed the action violated his right to due process.5

34
In Carter v. Thomas, 527 F.2d 1332 (5th Cir.1976), the Fifth Circuit held that a district court's procedure for handling habeas petitions which routinely resulted in delays of up to twenty months violated due process. However, in Satterlee v. Kritzman, 626 F.2d 682, 683 (9th Cir.1980), we held that a district court's clerical error which resulted in an eight-month delay between the dismissal of a prisoner's habeas petition and the time his files were forwarded to the court of appeals did not deprive the petitioner of any substantive rights. As in Satterlee, here there is no policy of discrimination and no showing that the delay was purposeful.

VII.

35
We conclude that the district court properly dismissed Prantil's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

36
AFFIRMED.

*
The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)

1
Because Prantil's direct appeal presented the same constitutional claims as his subsequent habeas petition, it is unnecessary for him to have filed for state habeas relief. Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987)

2
Prantil was released from prison on April 20, 1987. However, because a felony conviction may cause a defendant to suffer adverse collateral consequences even after he has served his sentence, a defendant's release from custody prior to the completion of his federal habeas corpus proceedings will not render his petition moot. Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234, 237-38, 88 S.Ct. 1556, 1559, 20 L.Ed.2d 554 (1968). Prantil was in custody when he filed the petition in district court, so this court retains jurisdiction over the proceedings after he is released. Id

3
Under California law, a person is guilty of forgery if he passes or attempts to pass as true and genuine a forged instrument with knowledge of the forgery and with the specific intent to defraud. Cal. Penal Code Sec. 470; People v. Hellman, 189 Cal.App.2d 777, 778-79, 11 Cal.Rptr. 433 (1961). The only element Prantil challenges as lacking sufficient evidence is the true and genuine requirement

4
Once a suspect is indicted, the more stringent requirements of the speedy trial right apply. Arnold v. McCarthy, 566 F.2d 1377, 1382 (9th Cir.1978)

5
Prantil first raised the issue in his brief to this court. Ordinarily, this court will not decide an issue which was not raised at the District Court. Bolker v. C.I.R., 760 F.2d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir.1985). The court may decide an issue for the first time on appeal, however, where review is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice or to preserve the integrity of the judicial process. Id. Because a claim that a district court violated a party's due process rights questions the integrity of the federal judicial system, we review Prantil's claim despite his failure to raise it below

CC | Transformed by Public.Resource.Org

=========================================================================

MAIN SITE http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/search?q=+Prantil+&circuit=

http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/756/759/162188/ A review of the prosecutor's remarks during the closing argument reveals that his statements, although derogatory and gratuitous by themselves, served to compound the prejudice to the defendant that flowed from Mr. Gorder's ambiguous role as both prosecutor and participant witness. The prosecutor's closing arguments illustrate the degree of actual prejudice that results when an advocate, through his direct participation in the events under litigation, can argue to the jury based on actual or perceived personal knowledge.⁵ The prosecutor launched a personalized attack on the defendant's motives. A recurrent theme of the prosecutor's summation was to portray the defendant as "greedy,"⁶ "corrupt," "dishonest," and "sleazy." The prosecutor cautioned the jury that the defendant did not meet the minimum standards of attorney behavior demanded by the "advocacy system of justice." As such, the prosecutor explained to the jury that "Mr. Prantil is the kind of person who gives lawyers a bad name to the general public and it's your duty as jurors to call him to account." The prosecutor charged the jury with the responsibility of ridding the ranks of the criminal defense bar of such a "crook" even though "it's true, thank God it's true, that criminal defense attorneys are not crooks as a general rule."

These comments came from an individual who was not only an experienced prosecutor but also, as the jury could not fail to appreciate, both a participant in many of the underlying events and Mr. Prantil's adversary throughout. As previously mentioned, Mr. Gorder had conducted the grand jury examination of the defendant that resulted in three of the defendant's perjury convictions. In his summation of the evidence on these counts, the prosecutor drew the jury's attention to the complete grand jury transcripts. Mr. Gorder informed the jury that these transcripts demonstrated that the defendant committed perjury "not just in the specific counts he's charged with, but in a number of other areas also." Once again, this is an assertion of personal knowledge of a testimonial rather than an argumentative character.

=================================

Initially, we decline to accept the government's contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that the defendant committed perjury by denying knowing who was with Powell in the Omaha area. No question concerning the identity of the person with Mr. Powell in the Omaha area was asked or answered in the grand jury proceedings. Further, the prosecutor's depiction of Mr. Prantil's actual remarks as an attempt to conceal the activities of his sister-in-law from the grand jury is somewhat puzzling in light of the fact that Mr. Gorder had, pursuant to Ms. Schmidt's prior agreement to cooperate with the government, full knowledge of her activities in and around the Omaha area. The only grand jury testimony elicited from the defendant focused on who picked up the defendant at the airport and who drove him back. The defendant said that a woman, whose name he couldn't recall, did so. In our view, this assertion could not have influenced the grand jury's investigation. The defendant's inaccurate testimony about a nonexistent woman at the airport could not have launched any further successful grand jury investigation.

30
The government's entire perjury theory on this count of the indictment depends in equal measure on the false premise that there was a woman at the airport and that this woman was the defendant's sister-in-law, whose identity the defendant wishes to conceal. The defendant, however, could not possibly be testifying falsely so as to shield a nonexistent woman. Similarly, the defendant's inability to recall the name of this nonexistent woman, a testimonial assertion that is hard to peg as a literal falsehood, could not have influenced the grand jury's deliberations. Simply put, if there was no blonde woman at the Omaha airport, the defendant's inability to recall her name is immaterial. Accordingly, because the defendant's testimony was not material, we hold that the defendant's conviction on Count Six is reversed.

31
CONCLUSION

32
To conclude, we reverse defendant's perjury conviction on Count Six of the indictment because the allegedly perjurious statements lack materiality. We reverse and remand the defendant's remaining convictions on the ground that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to recuse the participating prosecutor as a material witness and on the ground of prosecutorial misconduct in the government's closing argument.

===========================================

5
In winding up his closing argument, Mr. Gorder clarified his role in the case as follows:

Ladies and Gentlemen, our system of justice is an advocacy system of justice and there are adversaries. In this particular case the United States is an adversary, Frank Prantil is an adversor. I represent the United States and Mr. Iredale represents the defendant. That system depends upon a certain minimum standard of behavior, a system where the attorneys are honest with each other and with the court. Frank Prantil is not that kind of person. He was dishonest from day one until he walked off the stand on October 6th having said that everything was above the board. And it's your duty to call him to account for those actions, and I ask you to return verdicts of guilty on each count of the indictment.

R.T. 116.

6
In his closing argument, Mr. Gorder refers to the defendant's explanation, contained in a tape recording, that the monies he collected represented his attorney's fees in part. In response to the defendant's taped statement that "I have a right to earn my living too," the prosecutor explains to the jury, "He talks about he's just picking up his fees, again establishing his greed." R.T. 115 (emphasis added)

==========================================

Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., argued, Peter K. Nunez, U.S. Atty., Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Eugene G. Iredale, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of California.

Before FERGUSON and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON,* District Judge.

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge: http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/764/548/149993/

A review of the prosecutor's remarks during the closing argument reveals that his statements, although derogatory and gratuitous by themselves, served to compound the prejudice to the defendant that flowed from Mr. Gorder's ambiguous role as both prosecutor and participant witness. The prosecutor's closing arguments illustrate the degree of actual prejudice that results when an advocate, through his direct participation in the events under litigation, can argue to the jury based on actual or perceived personal knowledge.⁵ The prosecutor launched a personalized attack on the defendant's motives. A recurrent theme of the prosecutor's summation was to portray the defendant as "greedy,"⁶ "corrupt," "dishonest," and "sleazy." The prosecutor cautioned the jury that the defendant did not meet the minimum standards of attorney behavior demanded by the "advocacy system of justice." As such, the prosecutor explained to the jury that "Mr. Prantil is the kind of person who gives lawyers a bad name to the general public and it's your duty as jurors to call him to account." The prosecutor charged the jury with the responsibility of ridding the ranks of the criminal defense bar of such a "crook" even though "it's true, thank God it's true, that criminal defense attorneys are not crooks as a general rule."

25
These comments came from an individual who was not only an experienced prosecutor but also, as the jury could not fail to appreciate, both a participant in many of the underlying events and Mr. Prantil's adversary throughout. As previously mentioned, Mr. Gorder had conducted the grand jury examination of the defendant that resulted in three of the defendant's perjury convictions. In his summation of the evidence on these counts, the prosecutor drew the jury's attention to the complete grand jury transcripts. Mr. Gorder informed the jury that these transcripts demonstrated that the defendant committed perjury "not just in the specific counts he's charged with, but in a number of other areas also." Once again, this is an assertion of personal knowledge of a testimonial rather than an argumentative character.

=========================================

(1984). Hence, we must decide whether the defendant's testimony was material.

29
Initially, we decline to accept the government's contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that the defendant committed perjury by denying knowing who was with Powell in the Omaha area. No question concerning the identity of the person with Mr. Powell in the Omaha area was asked or answered in the grand jury proceedings. Further, the prosecutor's depiction of Mr. Prantil's actual remarks as an attempt to conceal the activities of his sister-in-law from the grand jury is somewhat puzzling in light of the fact that Mr. Gorder had, pursuant to Ms. Schmidt's prior agreement to cooperate with the government, full knowledge of her activities in and around the Omaha area. The only grand jury testimony elicited from the defendant focused on who picked up the defendant at his hotel and who drove him back to the Omaha Airport. The defendant said that a woman, whose name he couldn't recall, did so. In our view, this assertion could not have influenced the grand jury's investigation. The defendant's inaccurate testimony about a nonexistent woman could not have launched any further successful grand jury investigation.

30
The government's entire perjury theory on this count of the indictment depends in equal measure on the false premise that there was a woman who met him at his hotel and that this woman was the defendant's sister-in-law, whose identity the defendant wishes to conceal. The defendant, however, could not possibly be testifying falsely so as to shield a nonexistent woman. Similarly, the defendant's inability to recall the name of this nonexistent woman, a testimonial assertion that is hard to peg as a literal falsehood, could not have influenced the grand jury's deliberations. Simply put, if there was no blonde woman who met the defendant at his hotel and drove him to the airport, the defendant's inability to recall her name is immaterial. Accordingly, because the defendant's testimony was not material, we hold that the defendant's conviction on Count Six is reversed.

===========================================

1
http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/764/548/149993/ See United States v. Powell, 708 F.2d 455 (9th Cir.1983), rev'd in part, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 471, 83 L.Ed.2d 461 (1984). Betty Powell was convicted on four counts of a fifteen-count indictment which had alleged that she conspired with her husband and son to distribute cocaine. She was acquitted on all substantive conspiracy counts. Three of her four convictions, those alleging the use of a telephone to facilitate drug offenses, were subsequently reversed on appeal, United States v. Powell, 708 F.2d 455 (9th Cir.1983), but then reinstated by the Supreme Court, United States v. Powell, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 471, 83 L.Ed.2d 461 (1984)

(9th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 931, 99 S.Ct. 2864, 61 L.Ed.2d 300 (1979)

5
In winding up his closing argument, Mr. Gorder clarified his role in the case as follows:

Ladies and Gentlemen, our system of justice is an advocacy system of justice and there are adversaries. In this particular case the United States is an adversary, Frank Prantil is an adversor. I represent the United States and Mr. Iredale represents the defendant. That system depends upon a certain minimum standard of behavior, a system where the attorneys are honest with each other and with the court. Frank Prantil is not that kind of person. He was dishonest from day one until he walked off the stand on October 6th having said that everything was above the board. And it's your duty to call him to account for those actions, and I ask you to return verdicts of guilty on each count of the indictment.

R.T. 116.

6
In his closing argument, Mr. Gorder refers to the defendant's explanation, contained in a tape recording, that the monies he collected represented his attorney's fees in part. In response to the defendant's taped statement that "I have a right to earn my living too," the prosecutor explains to the jury, "He talks about he's just picking up his fees, again establishing his greed." R.T. 115 (emphasis added)

===========================================================================

MAIN SITE http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/search?q=+Prantil+&circuit=

http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/756/759/162188/ A review of the prosecutor's remark

Report Attachments:

do not tread on me

Astoria,
New York,
USA

Blood Love And Lust Spells Exposes Criminals, REAL Gypsy Scum Prantil CLAN

#45Consumer Comment

Fri, July 30, 2010

Hello to all who read this- this is Enchantress Jan Windglows, owner and successful entrepreneur of my beautiful web site, www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

The person above posting against us on the Internet is a deluded woman from New York facing a lot of criminal charges, named Mary Prantil.

We expect her to be thrown in jail this October hopefully sooner. She is a liar and blabber mouth, as everyone can see, and a garbage mouth as well.

Every time she emails or calls us, we simply send her threatening emails and phone calls to the attorney in New York currently prosecuting her.

For future reference, my husband and I will continue to run our very reputable and innocent highly successful business and continnue to defend ourselves, no matter WHAT Mary Prantil says.

We know who we are, and we know who Mary Prantil is.

Give me a call if any questions. By the way, I see Mary had to actually write a long story of lies about me since she did a background check and could not find anything on MY record, lol.

The comical thing about all of this is, nobody CARES what Mary Prantil writes or says. She is a liar and nobody or any of my cleints EVER ask me who Mary Prantil even IS.

do not tread on me

Astoria,
New York,
USA

Proof with links that Mary Prantil is a two bit liar criminal, LOL

#45REBUTTAL Owner of company

Fri, July 30, 2010

Hello to all who read this- this is Enchantress Jan Windglows, owner and successful entrepreneur of my beautiful web site, www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

The person above posting against us on the Internet is a deluded woman from New York facing a lot of criminal charges, named Mary Prantil.

We expect her to be thrown in jail this October hopefully sooner. She is a liar and blabber mouth, as everyone can see, and a garbage mouth as well.

Every time she emails or calls us, we simply send her threatening emails and phone calls to the attorney in New York currently prosecuting her.

For future reference, my husband and I will continue to run our very reputable and innocent highly successful business and continnue to defend ourselves, no matter WHAT Mary Prantil says.

We know who we are, and we know who Mary Prantil is.

Give me a call if any questions. By the way, I see Mary had to actually write a long story of lies about me since she did a background check and could not find anything on MY record, lol.

The comical thing about all of this is, nobody CARES what Mary Prantil writes or says. She is a liar and nobody or any of my cleints EVER ask me who Mary Prantil even IS.

Report Attachments:

OpinionatedAmerican

Tampa,
Florida,
USA

SPELLS DON"T WORK -Scammers Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows - Convicted Criminals

#45Consumer Comment

Wed, July 28, 2010

BOYCOTT SCAM Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan CyberStalker and Public Menace - DO NOT USE www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

BOYCOTT SCAM Jan Windglows CyberStalker and Public Menace - DO NOT USE www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

OpinionatedAmerican - Tampa (USA)

SUBMITTED: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 POSTED: Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Scam Jan Windglows is a Cyber Stalker and Menace - PO Box #118, Bonners Ferry 208-714-4348. SCAM Jan Windglows is BALD from her CRACK addiction and uses WIGS to disguise herself.

SCAM Jan Windglows is a Convicted Felon from SUMTER Florda Jail - it is PUBLIC information for those want to bother and look it up.

Hey SCAM Jan Windglows I did look up the info on Mary Prantil - and you POST LIES - these are just COURT DATES not CONVICTIONS and hey SCAM Jan Windglows - so is the info on the NY ADA - I bet you do speak to him...guess what - Ms. Prantil is NOT at Rikers Island as you say.

SCAM Jan Windglows has been caught in her lies and Cyber Stalking- but worse since the recent postings that caught my EYE have caught the attention of an X-employee that worked for SCAM Jan Windglows in Bushnell, Florida.

Ex- emplyee trhank you for posting the info about SUMTER Jail -SCAM Jan Windglows is a FUGITIVE from Sumter Flroda JAIL - look who is calling the Kettle BLACK.

Scam Jan Windglows Verified Convicted Criminal and SCAMMER!!! Do Not use www.bloodloveandlustspells.com PO Box #118, Bonners Ferry, Idaho..previously PO BOX #712 Driggs, Idaho last mailing address: 7961 Court, Bushnell Idaho...home of SUMTER JAIL.

DO NOT USE - SCAM Jan Windglows - Convicted Criminal and Cyber Stalker - BOYCOTT the SCAM Site www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

Jan Windglows you can run but you can't HIDE - The SUMTER Florida JAIL want you back - SCAM Jan Windglows is a FUGITIVE - for Deception Fraud - Everytime SCAM Jan Windglows offer to do a SPELL for MONEY Jan Windglows is commtting DECEPTION FRAUD - call the Police and report the CRIME

Report Attachments:

Defender Of The Innocent

Astoria,
New York,
USA

PUBLIC STAY AWAY FROM MARY T. PRANTIL she is psychotic and very dangerous and will be locked up soon and that will be a good thing the streets of New York will be safe again

#45Consumer Comment

Mon, December 14, 2009

Fact: Mary T. Prantil CANNOT READ or she is BLIND - she keeps posting WRONG contact information for Blood Love And Lust Spells, LOL.

Fact: Mary T. Prantil probably drinks her OWN blood, lol which is why she keeps blabbering her big mouth saying that other people drink theirs, HA HA HA.

Fact: Mary T. Prantil accuses innocent people that had tried to help her of EVERYTHING she is actually doing herself.

Fact: Mary T. Prantil has lost her battle on the Internet and will go to JAIL SOON......BOO h*o and Good bye Prantil- your posts are pathetic and everyone knows you are nothing but a LIAR AND CRIMINAL.

Apparently CRIME runs in Mary T. Prantil's family......see the factual information below on Mary T. Prantil's criminal crooked attorney father, Frank G. Prantil. Not only is Mary T. Prantil a criminal but so was her father.

Mary T. Prantil is following in her criminal father's footsteps while trying to cover up the truth, and hide behind all of her lies. Contact Jan Windglows and she will forward true records all about this to anyone who asks her for proof.

Mary T. Prantil has her proof.....and Mary T. Prantil IS GOING TO JAIL for fraudulent and criminal activities and many other crimes she has committed against innocent people.

Jan Windglows is the most beautiful and kindest lady I have ever met, and so is her husband James. In fact, Jan is home and happy running her business give her a call- just go to her web site and her phone number is there because I just spoke to her.

These ongoing LIES of Mary Prantil saying that Jan Windglows was arrested for larceny is utter HOGWASH and more lies and st made up out of the crazy drug fried out rotten brain of criminal Mary Prantil.

Look like Mary Prantil is running out of lies to tell about Jan and James so she is making up MORE LIES, and guess what? NOBODY believes you anymore, Mary !

ALL the information about Mary Prantil's deceased father is CORRECT. He has his name listed all over attorney's websites on the internet, and is not spoken of with any type of respect whatsoever. Type Frank G. Prantil into your browser and you will find out all about it.

The fact of the matter is , Mary Prantil is up here shooting off her mouth telling lie after lie about Jan Windglows and James Morgan- who only tried to help her in times past when she was a client of theirs long ago.

They terminated her case because she broke all the rules and regulations she promised to keep when Jan first took her case, so who's fault is that? It is Mary Prantil's fault.

Actually I heard that Mary Prantil DID get her spell manifested with Jans' services, THEN PRANTIL MESSED EVERYTHING UP between herself and her then boyfriend, then was OUT OF CONTROL so Jan had to drop her case completely.

I know a lot of people that are involved in this Prantil scandal, so Andromeda, do not get up here and come across to the public like you know it all, because you don't. Mary Prantil is a criminal, she is a stalker, she is a computer hacker, a phone hacker, a liar, she has been arrested several times and currently is IN A LOT OF TROUBLE, and SHE IS GOING WHACKO BECAUSE SHE KNOWS SHE WILL BE IN JAIL SOON.

Jan Windglows and James Morgan did NOTHING wrong- they are defending themselves against this MONSTER Mary Prantil.

Have you ever read all the postings here about Mary Prantil and how she steals from businesses? Apparently NOT. Jan and James only deal in FACTS they are not liars or thieves that have to make up stories because they have FACTS AND THEY HAVE PROOF and back their facts and everything they say on this forum up with FACTS and NOT lies like Mary T. Prantil does.

Prantil is going as far as to post lies such as Jan Windglows being arrested for larceny, which is another lie on Prantil's part. All the posts on Mary Prantil and her father are TRUE.

Jan and James have every right to defend themselves against Prantil-----so if Mary Prantil does not want any more information being posted about her or her family that can incriminate her even MORE, IF SHE CAN'T TAKE IT SHE SHOULD NOT DISH IT OUT.

Unfortunately for Mary Prantil, she feels she has to rely on lies to the public to try and discredit the names of Jan and James because she does not have anything else except the lies she dreams up in her attempts to cause trouble for Jan and James.

I do defend the innocent- yes it is true that Mary Prantil's father is deceased, but that is NOT the point- the point IS, that Mary Prantil learned her criminal behavior from her father whether he is deceased or not.

Mary Prantil is a criminal, and so was her father. If Mary Prantil does not like information about her deceased father being posted here, then she should STOP slinging mud constantly at two innocent people and telling lies about them on the internet.

It is OBVIOUS that Mary Prantil is getting what is coming to her. Jan Windglows is not guilty of any crimes neither is James Morgan. But Prantil certainly is.

In fact, Mary Prantil started this scandal. Jan and James did not come up here on this forum out of the blue for no reason or to hurt anyone, but only to defend themselves.

Jan and James were not attempting to pick on Mary Prantil's deceased father, but by showing the FACTS ( not LIES or false information ) about Mary Prantil AND her deceased father, the public now knows where Mary Prantil learned to be a criminal and indeed Prantil IS following in her father's footsteps.

Mary Prantil brought this upon herself. If she would have left these two innocent people alone to begin with, all of this could have been avoided.

Everyone who comes to this forum- you should read these posts again. Mary Prantil is the one at fault here.

You apparently do not know Jan or James but I will tell you that they are forthright, Jan runs an honest and successful business, and they do everything to help their clients. Anyone that reads this should call Jan and James and see what caring and honest people they are.

Mary Prantil lies, and lies, and lies......posting such GARBAGE up here like Jan and James are idolaters and that they drink their own blood.

The only other thing I have to say is that Mary Prantil's deceased father is probably rolling in his grave and looking down on his daughter with disappointment and disgust for all the trouble she is in, and has attempted to get other innocent people into.

MARY T. PRANTIL SHAME SHAME SHAME ON YOU for who and what you are. You are TRASH so go crawl into a trash can somewhere and stop running your liar mouth about Jan and James.

Mary Prantil is in a LOT OF LEGAL TROUBLE RIGHT NOW and if anyone that reads this feels sorry for this vicious woman Prantil, I DARE anyone who reads this forum posting to call Mary Prantil and give her your email address and your phone number.

YOU WILL THEN SEE for yourself what kind of TRASH Mary Prantil REALLY is, and what she is capable of, because Mary Prantil will do all the same things to YOU, so watch out about what you are saying.

If anyone reading this has any doubts about what I am writing here, and think that Mary T. Prantil is NOT a criminal, call Mary Prantil and see what a whacko she is for yourself. Just type in Mary Prantil in your Internet browser, I DARE YOU and get her phone number and write her an email.

Then come back and post on this forum after she has stalked you, harassed you, threatened you, etc. then Prantil will be on this forum making up all kinds of lies about you too, AND posting them all over the Internet !!!!

If you decide to email Mary Prantil, make sure you have a good anti virus program on your computer. She is mean and vindictive and outright EVIL and she is known all over the Internet for sending people viruses to try and destroy their computers.

So......are you going to take my dare and give Mary Prantil a call and give her your phone number?

If you DO, Mary Prantil will harass and stalk you until you are forced to change your phone number and block her from your emails.

Or mabie after Prantil emails you will not even HAVE a computer because she is a phone and computer hacker and loves to send viruses and loves to harass and stalk because she is in so much trouble she cannot even get a JOB.

MATTER OF THE DISBARRMENT OF CRIMINAL ATTORNEY FRANK G. PRANTIL

(Mary T. Prantil KEEPS POSTING LIES ABOUT Innocent business and top spell casters BLOOD LOVE AND LUST SPELLS, JIM MORGAN AND JAN WINDGLOWS OF BLOOD LOVE AND LUST SPELLS...

it is no WONDER that Mary T. Prantil is such a CRIMINAL and SCAM CON...hey public take a look and read below and click the links to verify that Mary T. Prantil and her father are the same birds of a feather- criminals, liars, and drug addicts !!!

After you THE PUBLIC read the information below, you will learn all about Mary T. Prantil's father getting disbarred TWICE as a lawyer, that he caused a MISTRIAL for a famous HIGH PROFILE murder case, that he charged several times for misconduct,mis representing his clients, all about his cocaine addictions, his lies, schemes, causing a mistrial for a famous controversial murder case, stealing money in the amount of $750,000 from a safe from inside a client's house...

Mary T. Prantil apparently learned everything she knows about being a criminal from her criminal father. PRANTIL GET OFF THE INTERNET AND STOP SHOWING YOUR UGLY LIAR FACE BECAUSE EVERYONE KNOWS ALL ABOUT YOU AND YOUR CRIMINAL FATHER. TAKE A HIKE, YOU ROTTEN LIAR SCUM GUTTER TRASH.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. D-787

110 S. Ct. 493, 493 U.S. 972, 107 L. Ed. 2d 497, 58 U.S.L.W. 3351, 1989.SCT.45677 <http://www.versuslaw.com>

November 27, 1989

IN THE MATTER OF DISBARRMENT OF FRANK G. PRANTIL

For earlier order herein, see Rehnquist, Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy

It having been reported to the Court that Frank G. Prantil, of Fair Oaks, California, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of California and this Court by order of May 15, 1989, having suspended the said Frank G. Prantil from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued;

It is ordered that the said Frank G. Prantil be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

Disposition

Disbarrment entered.

19891127

1998 VersusLaw Inc.

http://wi.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.%5CSCT%5CSCT2%5C1989%5C19891127_0045677.SCT.htm/qx

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Powered by VersusLaw, Inc.
Home | Advertise | About | Feedback | Terms | Privacy Policy | FAQ
All contents Copyright 2008 - 2009 VersusLaw, Inc. Bellevue, WA, USA. All rights reserved

On trial before the bar court in San Francisco, FRANK PRANTIL [#35155], 67, of Sacramento is charged with multiple counts of failing to perform legal services competently. Prantil was disbarred in 1989, reinstated in 1994 and charged with misconduct in 2002. The trial on the new charges was ongoing at press time and although the bar had not formally asked for his disbarment, it is a possible penalty.

The 1989 disbarment was the result of convictions for forgery and being an accessory to possess cocaine.

http://www.calbar.ca.gov/state/calbar/calbar_cbj.jsp?sCategoryPath=/Home/Attorney%20Resources/California%20Bar%20Journal/June2005&sCatHtmlPath=cbj/2005-06_TH_03_2nd-disbarments.html&sCatHtmlTitle=Top%20Headlines

In a case two miles across town at the State Bar offices on Howard Street -- and at the other end of the world of privilege -- 67-year-old defense attorney Frank Prantil is facing a task he's already performed numerous times -- defending himself against accusations that he's acted unethically as an attorney. In 1979, Prantil was suspended from practicing law after he was accused of improperly representing a client. While on probation, Prantil was alleged to have participated in a check-fraud scheme. He was convicted of forgery and disbarred, according to the California Supreme Court opinion confirming Prantil's disbarment.

Prantil later took advantage of California rules that allow disbarred attorneys to ask for reinstatement after five years. Prantil successfully argued that he had rehabilitated himself, and resumed practice in 1994.

Prantil is now facing State Bar disciplinary charges, which could potentially get him disbarred again, alleging that he failed to competently defend a client, then improperly charged the client for his services.

Prantil's case, along with three cases decided earlier this year in which California attorneys were disbarred for a second time, has added steam to a nine-year-old bureaucratic proposal to give judges the option of disbarring the worst attorneys for life.

In California, there now exists no legal concept of permanent disbarment. A State Bar committee on Nov. 15 will consider the possibility of changing that, if only slightly. Rather than making all disbarments permanent, it would extend from five to seven years the amount of time disbarred attorneys would have to wait before requesting to be reinstated, and would give judges the option of forever banishing the worst of California's worst attorneys.

The fact that it's taken nine years for such a mild proposal to reach this preliminary step hints at a lack of seriousness the California legal establishment lobby applies to abuses by its own members.

http://www.sfweekly.com/2005-11-09/news/baring-equality/

***********

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank G. PRANTIL, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

June 25, 1985

764 F.2d 548

Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., argued, Peter K. Nunez, U.S. Atty., Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Eugene G. Iredale, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

AMENDED OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of California.

Before FERGUSON and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, * District Judge.

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:

1
The defendant, a criminal defense attorney, appeals his conviction on eight out of eleven counts alleged in an indictment for the offenses of perjury, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1623; false statements, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1001; and being accessory after the fact, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3. All of the defendant's convictions are predicated on actions he took while representing a criminal defendant, Betty Powell, in a separate criminal prosecution. After a seven-day trial the jury found the defendant not guilty on two counts of harboring a fugitive and perjury. The district court had previously dismissed the misprision of a felony count before the trial began. On appeal, the defendant raises a host of issues which, for the most part, we need not address. Three of the defendant's challenges, however, require reversal of the defendant's convictions for the reasons explained herein.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

2
The defendant was retained by Ronald Powell to represent his wife, Betty Lou Powell, and her son in a federal criminal prosecution on various drug-related charges.1 Mr. Powell had been a previous client of the defendant in unrelated criminal proceedings. After Mrs. Powell and her son were arrested at the Powell residence on April 23, 1982 in connection with the narcotics charges, Mr. Powell, who was also named in the felony arrest warrant, remained a fugitive until his apprehension on August 10, 1982. On the day of his wife's arrest, Mr. Powell telephoned the defendant, Frank Prantil, and retained his services for the criminal proceedings against his immediate family. Throughout Mr. Powell's fugitive status, the defendant periodically telephoned Mr. Powell and met him on at least two occasions.

3
During their first meeting after the incarceration of Mrs. Powell, Mr. Powell presented the defendant with a partial payment of the retainer agreement and directed the defendant to the whereabouts of other sources of cash in various bank accounts and at the Powell residence. Mrs. Powell, unable to make a $750, 000 bond, remained incarcerated until the completion of her criminal trial. She gave the defendant the power of attorney to collect the funds from the various bank accounts. The defendant also retrieved a substantial sum of money from a floor safe at the Powell residence that had been overlooked at the time of the Powell family arrest. Although questions over the capacity in which Mr. Prantil retained custody of these monies (as attorney fees or in bailment for Mrs. Powell) occupied a substantial portion of the defendant's trial, we need not parse the evidence on this subject here. Pursuant to the retainer agreement negotiated by Mr. Powell, the defendant represented Mrs. Powell for the duration of her criminal trial. The case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Charles Gorder.

4
Mr. Prantil succeeded in obtaining an acquittal on all but four of the fifteen criminal counts leveled against his client Mrs. Powell. During the course of his representation of Mrs. Powell, the defendant also sent his sister-in-law, Malvina Schmidt, to meet the fugitive Ronald Powell for reasons not relevant here. Within the same time frame, the defendant, on several occasions, acted as the conduit for negotiations between the fugitive Ronald Powell and Assistant U.S. Attorney Gorder for Mr. Powell's surrender. During the period when Mr. Powell was a fugitive, the defendant was summoned before a grand jury and questioned by Mr. Gorder concerning his contacts and relationship with Mr. Powell. Three of the defendant's five perjury convictions rest on responses he made to Mr. Gorder's grand jury examination. The remaining two perjury charges and the two false statement counts stem from the events surrounding the defendant's efforts to obtain Mrs. Powell's release on bond pending the appeal from her criminal conviction. For purposes of this appeal, however, we need only discuss the evidence presented on one perjury count.

5
One of the defendant's perjury convictions rests on grand jury testimony the defendant gave under questioning by Mr. Gorder regarding a trip to Omaha, Nebraska. In his testimony the defendant stated that he was picked up by a blonde woman at his hotel in Omaha, Nebraska who took him to meet Mr. Powell and then transported the defendant to the airport. The defendant further testified that he did not know the identity of this woman. At trial the government contended that the defendant committed perjury when he denied knowing the name of this woman.

6
Under the government's theory, the defendant falsely denied knowing the identity of this blonde woman in order to protect the woman from the grand jury's investigation. The government unsuccessfully sought to prove that the blonde woman who met the defendant at his hotel was Malvina Schmidt, the defendant's sister-in-law. The evidence at trial revealed that although the defendant had been met and transported to a different airport by a blonde woman on a different occasion, no one picked up the defendant at his Omaha hotel. The evidence did demonstrate that the defendant eventually met his sister-in-law at a restaurant in the Omaha area. Accordingly, on appeal the government has shifted its perjury allegation by recasting the defendant's denial of knowledge about the name of the blonde woman who met him at his hotel into a denial of "knowing who was with [Mr.] Powell in the Omaha area." In response, the defendant claims his conviction should be reversed because the identity of the woman whom he incorrectly recalled to have met at his Omaha hotel is immaterial to any matters then before the grand jury and thus not perjurious.

II. ISSUES ON APPEAL

7
The defendant has raised several challenges to his convictions on appeal. We reach only three of his challenges. The defendant's first allegation of error involves the refusal of the trial court to grant a pretrial motion to have the prosecutor, Mr. Gorder, recused from the case so that the defendant could call Mr. Gorder as a witness. The defendant also claims that the prosecutor exceeded the bounds of proper argument during closing argument and the defendant was thereby prejudiced. The final contention of error challenges the materiality of the defendant's allegedly perjurious statements regarding the blonde woman at the Omaha airport.

8
The defendant has also raised a claim of insufficiency of the evidence as to counts seven and eight of the indictment which charged the defendant with violations of the false statement statute, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1001. In essence, the government presented evidence that the defendant attempted to secure the release of his client Betty Powell through the submission of an appeal bond form that the defendant knew was not authorized by the named bond company. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution we find the evidence presented sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). Nonetheless, for the reasons discussed in the balance of the opinion, we reverse the defendant's convictions on these and the other counts of the indictment.

A. The Propriety of a Prosecuting Witness

9
The prosecutor in this case, Assistant United States Attorney Charles Gorder, was also the prosecutor in the previous trial of Betty Powell. Mr. Gorder not only opposed the defendant in that trial but also conducted the examination of the defendant in both the grand jury and bond proceedings that are the subject of defendant's perjury convictions in this case. Mr. Gorder was also involved in the discussions with the bond agency as to the adequacy of Mrs. Powell's bond collateral which gave rise to the defendant's false statement convictions. Finally, on several occasions Mr. Gorder negotiated directly with the defendant for the surrender of Ronald Powell, the fugitive whom the defendant was accused of harboring and giving aid. Thus, although he never took the stand, Mr. Gorder was a witness to, and indeed a participant in, some aspect of all of the events alleged in the indictment.

10
The defendant was charged and convicted of being an accessory after the fact to Mr. Powell's criminal offenses in that the defendant did "receive, relieve, comfort and assist Ronald Lee Powell in order to hinder and prevent his apprehension, trial and punishment, " in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3. During trial the principal defense asserted by the defendant to this count, and the harboring a fugitive charge, revolved around the defendant's efforts to successfully negotiate Mr. Powell's surrender with Mr. Gorder. Rather than harboring or assisting Mr. Powell, the defendant contended he was actively conducting the ongoing negotiations for Mr. Powell's timely surrender through direct communications with both Mr. Gorder and Mr. Powell. Obviously, this defense hinges substantially on the availability of evidence detailing the defendant's role in these surrender negotiations.

11
Both before and during the trial defense counsel unsuccessfully moved the court to recuse the prosecutor to enable the defense to call him as a witness. After final argument the defendant moved for a mistrial because the prosecutor's remarks "reaffirm[ed] Mr. Gorder's role as a witness in the case without cross-examination, because they appeared to be, in the way that they were framed, assertions of personal knowledge based on his dealings with Mr. Prantil." At every juncture, the prosecutor refused either to recuse himself or to testify. The trial court declined to disturb the prosecutor's decision and denied, without comment, all of the defendant's motions on this matter.

12
The prosecutor defended his decision, and the trial court concurred, on the grounds that his testimony was unnecessary and cumulative to the defendant's case. We recognize that a defendant has an obligation to exhaust other available sources of evidence before a court should sustain a defendant's efforts to call a participating prosecutor as a witness. United States v. West, 680 F.2d 652, 654 (9th Cir.1982). Nonetheless, the defendant's obligation to resort to alternative means of adducing factual testimony is not absolute. Both the quality and quantity of the alternate sources of evidence are proper subjects for comparison with that sought directly from the participating prosecutor. For example, in this case the prosecutor contends that his testimony on the defendant's efforts to arrange for the surrender of the fugitive Ron Powell was unnecessary and cumulative because the defendant could have presented some testimony on this point through an FBI agent who listened to some, but not all, of the relevant discussions. The prosecutor also avers that the defendant himself was available to testify as to any conversations for which there are no other witnesses besides the defendant and the prosecutor. The true worth of the prosecutor's generous suggestion that the defendant himself testify in order to "exhaust" all other sources of testimony, however, becomes self-evident when the prosecutor subsequently portrays the defendant's testimony as self-serving and "sleazy" in his summation before the jury.

13
Regardless of the prosecutor's view of the utility of his own testimony, the district judge is charged with the responsibility of making determinations as to the materiality of witness testimony. In so doing, the court must honor the defendant's constitutional rights under the confrontation and compulsory process clauses of the Sixth Amendment. The unequivocal admonition of the Supreme Court on this point bears repetition here:

14
The need to develop all relevant facts in the adversary system is both fundamental and comprehensive. The ends of criminal justice would be defeated if judgments were to be founded on a partial or speculative presentation of the facts. The very integrity of the judicial system and public confidence in the system depend on full disclosure of all the facts, within the framework of the rules of evidence. To ensure that justice is done, it is imperative to the function of courts that compulsory process be available for the production of evidence needed either by the prosecution or by the defense.

MARY PRANTIL HAS BEEN RUNNING AROUND THIS FORUM STATING THIS AND THAT UNDER FALSE NAMES AND PLACES WHILE NOT REALLY PRODUCING ANY SOLID EVIDENCE TO THESE SAME CLAIMS MADE BY HER AGAINST US. NO VALIDITY AND OR SUBSTANCE AT ALL TO HER CLAIMS OTHER THEN HER VENTING ACCUSATIONS COMING AT US OUT OF NOWHERE.

Here's where Mary Ripped Off Another Spell Caster By Charging Back On Them After The Worked Was Performed. More Fraud On Mary's Part. Who's The Real Fraud Here I ask you?. MARY PRANTIL WOULD BE THE ANSWER. SHE SAYS THAT SHE PAYS FOR HER WORK BUT APPARENTLY DOESN'T ACCORDING TO THIS SPELL CASTER BELOW. MAKES YOU WONDER ABOUT THE OTHER STATEMENTS THAT MARY PROFESSES AS TRUTH HUH ?.

Jan: I've forwarded you two e-mails in regard to Mary Prantil. Yes, I did read for her, also she spent over 3 1/2 hours on the phone to me. During said time she cried, cused and begged me to do a spell for her. I said that I don't usually do spells for people that I do not know.Also I told her that usually people charge 1,000.00 for the type of spell that she wanted, as that is High Magic , not something simple.

Also the first card I got for her situation was the Heirophant, follwed by the four of wands. I asked Mary if H _ _ _ _ was married , she said "No, not my H".

Well she begged me so many times, interrupted my other business, called at all hours. she cried so much to me. I finally gave in and said I'd do the spell. Then she bargined with me to do it for 800.00. Later she said that she had soooo many bills and could I do it for 500.00.

I did it .It worked immediately, as her e-mail proves. Then she found out that H---- is a drug addict and that he is married and has several other girlfriends. I told her it was a moral choice, she admitted that in the past she "was no angel" with Jans service when I ask her what happened. She charged me back on her credit card with Paypal and tryed to claim that the "merchandise" was not the quality that she expected.

I said I would reverse the spell if she didn't pay me, I told her that she should get professional therapy and I even arranged free drug counseling for her boy friend; all of which she refused. I sent her a photo of part of the spell and a paper tailsman as proof that I performed the service.

HERE'S WHERE MARY REPORTED JIM MORGAN TO PAY PAL FOR FRAUD. MY QUESTION FOR MARY IS (HOW CAN YOU STEAL SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EXISTS?). THESE INVOICES WERE NEVER PAID BY MARY PRANTIL TO START WITH LOL.

Mary Prantil tried to screw up Jan's Pay Pal account by attempting to pay her own invoices until Jan found out what she was doing and informed pay pal as to Prantil's fraudulent activities. Prantil was going to pay off on her own invoices only to cancel them OUT soon after so she could place a claim of Fraud against Jim Morgan on this account. Again, Jim Morgan doesn't even own the company nor does he have anything to do with the administrative functions of this company such as receiving monies for anything especially spell work.

Of course Pay Pal laughed at this little Prantil Con Game and Denied Prantil's fraudulent claims against us. Mary also was confused in the way that she was trying to report Jim Morgan to pay pal for running and or owning a company to which he has no connections to other then helping out with the counseling part of the operation to which he doesn't get paid for.

See how miss-informed Mary Is. Basically what Mary was trying to do was get her work performed for free by paying Jan with checks and then attempting to get her money back for these cashed checks through pay pal. Notice where this email originated from below and who it was sent to under the original message heading. To those of you that know how to check IP Addresses this should clear up any doubts that this is her actual communication to pay pal. So Much for Mary Prantil's claims of fraud & Tax Evasion on our part.

-----Original Message-----
From: m prantil
To: complaint-response@paypal.com
Cc: wizardmorgan2@aol.com; passionspells@aol.com
Sent: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:12 pm
Subject: Invoice From James Morgan

PayPay,

I wish to report James Morgan for internet Fraud. There is a $1200 invoice currently on my PayPal account form this site Loe lust and Blood spells.

I will forward emails to Payapal saying he is going to refund me. I will also call directly to file my complaint to prevent others form getting conned by him.

Thanks,

Mary Prantil

HERE'S WHERE MARY TRIED TO RIP JAN OFF BUT FAILED. MARY IS A RIP OFF SCAM WHO LIKES TO COMMIT FRAUD. MARY LIKES TO ACCUSE OTHERS OF THIS TO THROW SUSPICION FROM HERSELF. So Much for Mary Prantil's claims of fraud & Tax Evasion on our part.

Forwarded Message:
Subj: STOP BOTHERING US

Date: 6/19/2007 8:36:31 P.M. Pacific Standard Time
From: Passionspells
To: Prant99

Mary,

your pay pal invoices were never processed-- And this is my business- James is retired. How dare you say anything about him in a derrogatory manner after he went out of his way to help you. It is only because of the grace of Divinity and casting your spell that you have been getting along with H____ as well as you have been especially after you messed up your case and sent him nasty e-mails, etc.

We just sent you an e-mail and I strongly suggest you back off. I am getting ready to forward all of your e-mails to the FBI as I write this. You have, for one thing ( just one of many) already violated Federal Internet Law.

In addition, I will report you to our cell phone company immediately for harassing phone calls and telephone stalking.

In closing here are copies of the Pay Pal invoices you NEVER paid. You sent cash, and two personal checks. Here is a copy of your e-mail stating that:

6/14/2007 2:12:54 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time
From: Prant99

Reply To:

To: Passionspells, Wizardmorgan2

I sent you 1. cash, and a 2. Citibank check and a 3. Bank of America check.

-----Original Message-----
From: Passionspells@aol.com
To: Prant99@aol.com
Sent: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 4:08 pm
Subject: Verification Needed

Dear Mary,

This is Jan writing, dear. Could you please verify your method of payment with me when you initially came in for your spell work?

I am going through all of my client records doing verification, etc. for my records.

Thank you dear, I really appreciate it.

Sincerely,
Jan

Here is a copy and paste of the pay pal invoices that you never paid. I will write pay pal and forward them all of your abusive e-mails so that they will be aware of the nonsense you have caused us. You have no credence in that matter.

From:

Janhett T. Windglows
To:

Mary Prantil (prant99@aol.com)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amount:

$1,250.54 USD
Status:

Pending
Date Requested:

May 6, 2007

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject:

Spells Invoice
Invoice
Janhett T. Windglows
passionspells@aol.com
Qty Item ID Description Unit Price Amount
1 050607 30 Day Spells Package For Mary 1,200.00 1,200.00 T

Subtotal: 1,200.00

Shipping: 46.80 T
T = 0.299%tax applied to item Tax: 3.74

Currency is in U.S. Dollars (USD) Total: $1,250.54 USD

Request Sent

From:

Janhett T. Windglows
To:

Mary Prantil (prant99@aol.com)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amount:

$500.00 USD
Status:

Pending
Date Requested:

May 8, 2007

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject:

Revised Invoice

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note:

Here is the first 500 will send the next one right after this one thanks dear

Request Sent

From:

Janhett T. Windglows
To:

Mary Prantil (prant99@aol.com)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amount:

$500.00 USD
Status:

Pending
Date Requested:

May 8, 2007

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject:

2nd one

In closing, I will now forward your e- mails to the F.B.I. for harassment, abuse, and stalking. Also your spell work is now being reversed. You should have listened to us and things would not have turned out this way for you. Perhaps you will learn a lesson from all of this, however if you do not, that is no longer our problem.

-----------------------Jan

HERE'S ONE EXAMPLE OF HOW MARY CONDUCTED HERSELF THROUGHOUT HER ENTIRE SPELL PROCESS LOL. AND SHE WONDERS WHY NO ONE LIKES HER AND OR LAUGHS AT HER LOL.

Subj: Jim - Sex spell on Hani - Disruption Spell on Tony

Date: 7/3/2007 1:37:39 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
From: Prant99
To: Wizardmorgan2
CC: Passionspells

Jim, (and Jan)

H - - - actually said he is NOT sexually attracted to me last night...H- - - - is prob mad at me too bcs I made out and kissed 2 of his friends this is one of the reason I think he is upset and fri I was a raging drunk lunatic...Fri - I was upset about the email and I started drinking around 7pm and saw H - - - - by 11pm totally wasted...then his Egyptian friends are making fun of me or so H - - - - says...it may not be true the gossip but H - - - is acting discusted with me...saying all will be OK if I just accept that...he confessed about T - - - - and the email.

T - - - - is the negative influence...For the last 2-3 weeks H- - - - has been around T - - - again now look...Please talk with Jan about these 2 spells.

Let me know.

Mary

HERE IS WHERE JAN REPORTED MARY FOR EMAIL ABUSE TO THE AOL AND YAHOO WEB MASTERS AND HAD HER BLOCKED AS A RESULT OF THEIR FINDINGS. MORE FRAUD AND HARASSMENT TO US CARRIED OUT BY MARY PRANTIL.

Subj: ABUSE

Date: 8/21/2007 4:13:33 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
From: Passionspells
To: tosreports@aol.com

I wish to report an abusive e-mail sender. I have numerous copies of her e-mails. We have blocked her from our e-mail addresses, however she continues to send us more mail under different e-mail addresses.

Her name is Mary Prantil, and she has sent to us via the following e-mail addresses:

Prant99@aol.com

mary.prantil@email.com

I have all of her contact information, home address and telephone number. I really do need this abuse from her to stop.

My other screen name is wizardmorgan2@aol.com

in which she has also been blocked from.

Sincerely,

Jan Windglows

THIS IS MARY BEGGING JAN TO TAKE HER CASE BACK AFTER SHE TOTALLY MESSED THINGS UP WITH HER GUY. AT THIS POINT WE DIDN'T WANT TO DO ANYTHING FOR MARY AND FURTHER REJECTED ANYMORE FUNDS FROM HER. WE HAD OFFERED TO REFUND HER $1,200.00 AND MOREOVER TO EAT THE COST OF HER SPELL WORK JUST TO GET RID OF HER HOWEVER SHE DECLINED THE REFUND AS YOU CAN SEE IN HER STATEMENT BELOW.

Subj: Sorry I want U on my case...$250 more 2 send T. F last phase...

Date: 6/15/2007 3:56:00 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
From: Prant99
To: Wizardmorgan2
CC: Passionspells

Jim, I am sorry for any character defect in me that has got again "reared it's ugly head". I respect you and Jan and I truly want your help. Yes. I am needy, Yes I need to let go and let Divinity. Please do not give up on me..no time is lost if we just get thru this 24 hr bump of mine. Help me please !!

I believe in you and your expertise and your morals as a caster are so pure and high.

I do not want you to send me back any money.

I want to send you the $250 discussed to complete the disruption spell with T. F. I also want you to please make H. so uncomfortable without me,,,that he can't stop thinking about me and what a great friend I am and lover. To be so sexually frusterated without me...who ever he f**ks or has a one night stand or bi-sexual 3-way with H. will think of me..how lucky he was to have my love...that he f- - - - - - it up between us not me...that he can't rest until he gets me back - even if it means leaving T.F and the office.

Are you still willing to help me?

I truly want your help - I am done today at 1pm I will call you then I can send the $250 today.

Mary
the needy brat...but lovable and willing to let go....

THIS IS WHERE I CONFERRED WITH JAN AND WE BOTH DECIDED AT THE TIME TO FULLY TERMINATE MARY'S CASE AFTER GIVING HER SEVERAL CHANCES TO STRAIGHTEN UP AND FOLLOW THE RULES. THIS IS THE LETTER WE SENT HER AFTER GOING THROUGH TWO MONTHS OF HELL WITH Miss Chaos .

Mary,

Due to you ongoing harassing to Kim, Matilda and myself, I have decided counseling with Matilda is not in anyone's best interest. I have instructed Matilda not to have any further communications with you. After I send this e-mail, I will also instruct Kim not to have any further contact with you either.

Your spell work with James and myself has been finished, and Kim is finishing your spell work that you hired her for. I paid for your counseling with Kim. Since I paid for your counseling, which I did not have to do, for some reason you think that Kim's spell work included your counseling, which it did NOT. I PAID FOR YOUR COUNSELING. The 400 that you paid Kim was FOR SPELL WORK-----NOT FOR COUNSELING. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THIS??????

I am officially ending all contact with you right after I send this e-mail. I do not want you for a client from this point on. You have exhausted all of your resources of obtaining any further help with any of us, because of your RUDE DEMANDING rebellious controlling attitude, and constantly continuing to break the rules of the spell criteria.

HOW DARE YOU SAY ANYTHING TO ME ABOUT MY HONESTY AND INTEGRITY.

JUST SO YOU KNOW AND UNDERSTAND YOUR SPELL WORK HAS BEEN DONE SO WE DID YOUR WORK THAT YOU PAID US FOR. We did even more than that----numerous boosters, and re casts also.

WE DO NOT WANT YOU FOR A CLIENT EVER AGAIN.

CONCERNING ANY FURTHER POSSIBLE COUNSELING, I DO NOT HAVE ONE SINGLE COUNSELOR THAT IS WILLING TO WORK WITH YOU. YOU ARE OBNOXIOUS, DEMANDING, AND RUDE-----THIS IS WHY ALL OF THIS HAS COME TO THIS POINT.

GOOD BYE MARY. YOU ARE BY FAR THE WORST CLIENT I HAVE EVER HAD IN ALL MY YEARS OF SPELL CASTING.

CONArtist-JimMorganNOTaWizardorMagicalPowers

Park City,
Utah,
USA

#45UPDATE EX-employee responds

Sun, October 04, 2009

CONArtist-JimMorganNOTaWizardorMagicalPowers

Park City,
Utah,
USA

SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Owner of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 WARNING: www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com PO Box #712 Idaho, Driggs, 83422 . 805-455-Complete

#45UPDATE EX-employee responds

Sat, October 03, 2009

SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Owner of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 WARNING : www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com PO Box #712 Idaho , Driggs, 83422 . 805-455- Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!

SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Owner of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   Jan Windglows Will Seek REVENGE on unsatisfied customers who ask for a refund by posting blatant lies on Rip-off Report.com: DO NOT USE: JAN WINDGLOWS or her employee James or Jim Morgan !!!! NOT Psychics !!! NOT Spell Casters ! Will BREACH client confidentiality and post blatant lies on the Global Internet about clients that are unhappy and want a refund.

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 Con-artists/Internet Predators James Morgan and Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- BREACH CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY, NOT Spell casters or Psychics, Scam clients for money then disappear Complete Rip-off!!

DO NOT USE www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com . PO Box # 712 Idaho , Driggs, 83422 . 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 James Morgan and Jan Windglows BREACH Client Confidentiality , hack into clients personal computers to take your money out of checking accounts and credit cards; Stalk clients on Internet and post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet; Will NOT cast spells; and worse James Morgan and Jan Windglows are not spell casters or psychics; once they get your money they stop answering the phone!!!! Do not use Western Union or PayPal you will never get your money back from James Morgan and Jan Windglows. False Claims on website: NO MONEY BACK Guarantee!! Infact, Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows will retaliate and seek revenge on clients that ask for refund by posting slander, including changing and editing clients personal emails with false statements then posting on Global Internet. Truly, STAY AWAY FROM Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows WHO are sick socio-paths!!!

WARNING: Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!! SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Owner of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!

JAN WINDGLOWS HAS BEEN RUNNING AROUND THIS RIPOFF REPORT.COM WEBSITE STATING THIS AND THAT ABOUT X-Clients that asked for a refundWHILE NOT REALLY PRODUCING ANY SOLID EVIDENCE TO THESE CLAIMS MADE BY Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan...AGAINST unhappy clients that want a refund. NO VALIDITY AND OR SUBSTANCE AT ALL TO OF THESE Slanderous CLAIMS OTHER THEN THESE CON-ARTISTS VENTING ACCUSATIONS COMING AT X-clients that are simple retaliation for exposing this Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!
Here's where Jan Windglows tried to Rip-off both PayPal and clients by giving saying she gave psychic reading and that customers also wanted a spell but they didnt approve it and or Jan Windglows did not honor website offer of MONEY BACK GUARANTEE and clients never got their money back...Who is the real Fraud here I ask you? JAN WINDGLOWS OWNER OF www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 IS THE ANSWER. Jan Winglows SAYS THAT SHE Will refund the work...BUT APPARENTLY DOESN'T ACCORDING TO THIS UnHappy Customer BELOW. MAKES YOU WONDER ABOUT THE OTHER STATEMENTS THAT JAN WINDGLOWS PROFESSES.

SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Post Blatant Lies about X-client Mary Prantil who was Unsatisfied asked Jan for refund! DO NOT USE 805-455-6548.
COMPLAINT of Unhappy Customer: I've forwarded you two e-mails in regard to Jan Windglows. Yes, Jan did read for me. The worst reading of my life TOTAL rip-off !!! During said time Jan conned me and begged me to let her a spell for me. Also I told her that I usually dont even get psychic readings..Jan wanted $5,000.00 for the type of spell saying that it was High Magic , not something simpleI want a refund to my $150 psychic reading from Jan Windglows as it was the worst of my life.pls refund my PayPal account. I didnt want the spell and Jan Windglows said she would curse me and would reverse the spell if I didn't pay her $5000. I told her that she should get professional therapy. HERE'S WHERE JAN WINDGLOWS REPORTED CLIENTS TO PAY PAL FOR FRAUD. MY QUESTION FOR JAN WINDGLOWSIS (HOW CAN YOU STEAL SOMETHING THAT WASNT APPROVED DOESN'T EXISTS?). THESE INVOICES WERE NEVER APPROVED To be paid. Jan Windglows tried to screw up my Credit with Pay Pal account by attempting to pay her own invoices until as if it were me then saying I asked for charge back....the unhappy customer found out what Jan Windglows was doing and reported it to PayPal fraudulent activities. -----Original Message----- From: unhappycustomer to: complaint-response@paypal.com Cc: wizardmorgan2@aol.com ; passionspells@aol.com Sent: XXXXXXX Subject: Invoice20From James Morgan PayPay, I wish to report Jan Windlgows for Fraud she used my Credit Card without my permisssion and charged my Card $5000 There is a $1200 invoice currently on my PayPal account form this site Love lust and Blood Ppells...which I did not approve.

I didnt want the spell and Jan Windglows said she would curse me and would reverse the spell if I didn't pay her $5000. I told her that she should get professional therapy.
Thanks, Unhappy Customer of
JAN WINDGLOWS
SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Owner of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!    Will Seeks REVENGE on unsatisfied customers who ask for a refund
WARNING: Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!! SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Owner of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!

DO NOT USE www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com . PO Box # 712 Idaho , Driggs, 83422 . 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 James Morgan and Jan Windglows BREACH Client Confidentiality , hack into clients personal computers to take your money out of checking accounts and credit cards; Stalk clients on Internet and post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet; Will NOT cast spells; and worse James Morgan and Jan Windglows are not spell casters or psychics; once they get your money they stop answering the phone!!!! Do not use Western Union or PayPal you will never get your money back from James Morgan and Jan Windglows. False Claims on website: NO MONEY BACK Guarantee!! Infact, Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows will retaliate and seek revenge on clients that ask for refund by posting slander, including changing and editing clients personal emails with false statements then posting on Global Internet. Truly, STAY AWAY FROM Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows WHO are sick socio-paths!!!

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!
Gypsy SCUM James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows of several spell casting sites on the Global Internet including www.bloodloveandlustspells.com breach client confidentiality and are proven Internet Predators with no magical powers or wizardry.   These to Gypsy SCUM will commit DECEPTION FRAUD and IDENTITY THEFT and take clients for thousan ds and thousands of American hard earned dollars. DO NOT USE or be RIPPED OFF by these SCUM idiots who stalk their clients and commit internet fraud by hacking into savings/checking accounts and posting personal information of clients on Global Internet.

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!
Scam Spell Casting Scheme Operation James Morgan and Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com NOT WIZARDS- NOT PSYCHICS-NOT SPELL CASTERS !!! James/JIM Morgan and Jan Windglows have no magical powers and both are complete SCUM Rip-off Artist Scamming thousands of dollars off inn ocent CLIENTS...I know James/Jim Morgan AND Jan Windglows are complete Rip-off and Scam Artists whose only desire is to get as much money off their victims then NEVER answer their phone ever again...do not be taken by these CREEPS!!! WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!

DO NOT USE: FAKE Spell Casters James/Jim Morgan or Jan Windglows do not have magical powers and will only try to scam you for thousands of dollars.

WARNING : Complete Spell Cast ing Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!

BEWARE - Complete Rip-off !! : 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!! STAY AWA Y from these Internet Con-Artist !!!! Complete Scam Spell Casting Rip-off Scheme!!

BEWARE and DO NOT USE: James/Jim Morgan or Jan Windglows unless you want your money stolen from these Gypsy Scum 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224, PO Box #712 Driggs , Idaho 83422 . BREACH CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY: Do not send personal check or use Western Union or PayPal you will NEVER get your money back from James Morgan and Jan Windglows. False Claims on website: NO MONEY BACK Guarantee!! Infact, Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows will retaliate and seek revenge on clients that ask for refund by posting slander, including changing and editing clients personal emails with false statements then posting on Global Internet. Truly, STAY AWAY FROM Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows WHO are sick socio-paths!!!

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!! ;
BEWARE and DO NOT USE: 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com . PO Box # 712 Idaho , Driggs, 83422 . 805-455-
James/Jim Morgan and Jan W indglows: www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

Business phone: 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224
emails:
Jan Windglows: passionspells@aol.com
Jim Morgan: wizardmorgan2@aol.com

"Blood Love And Lust Spells" Here are some of James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows sites to beware and not use:

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/lovespellcastings.html http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/deathspells.html

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/ultimatespells.html s.html http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/magicdisruption.html

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/removeacurse.html

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/spellcastingpreviews.html

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/testamonials.html

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/orderaspell.html

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/spellcastinginfo.html

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: BREACH Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Intern et !!! STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!! Complete Scam Spell Casting Rip-off Scheme!!

WARNING: Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!! SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Owner of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!

Thank you Rip-off Report.com for exposing these Gypsy SCUM !!!

CONArtist-JimMorganNOTaWizardorMagicalPowers

Park City,
Utah,
USA

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists SCARY James Morgan and SCARIER Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- Breach Client Confidentiality,NOT Spellcasters or Psychics,Scam clients for CASH

#45Consumer Suggestion

Wed, September 30, 2009

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists/Internet Predators James Morgan and Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells. com- Breach Client Confidentiality, NOT Spellcasters or Psychics, Scam clients for money then dissappear Complete Rip-off!!
DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com . PO Box # 712 Idaho , Driggs, 83422. 805-455-6548 James Morgan and Jan Windglows Breach Client Confidentiality, hack into clients personal computers to take your money out of checking accounts and credit cards; Stalk clients on Internet and post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet; Will NOT cast spells; and worse James Morgan and Jan Windglows are not spell casters or psychics; once they get your money they stop answering the phone!!!! Do not use Western Union or PayPal you will never get your money back from James Morgan and Jan Windglows. False Claims on website: NO MONEY BACK Guarantee!!
WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!
Gypsy SCUM James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows of several spell casting sites on the Global Internet including www.bloodloveandlustspells.com breach client confidentiality and are proven Internet Predators with no magical powers or wizardry. These to Gypsy SCUM will commit deception fraud and Identity Theft and take clients for thousands and thousands of American hard earned dollars. DO NOT USE or be RIPPED OFF by these SCUM idiots who stalk their clients and commit internet fraud by hacking into savings/checking accounts and posting personal information of clients.

Scam Spell Casting Scheme Operation James Morgan and Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com NOT WIZARDS- NOT PSYCHICS-NOT SPELLSCASTERS !!!James/JIM Morgan and Jan Windglows have no magical powers and both are complete SCUM Rip-off Artist Scamming thousands of dollars off innocent CLIENTS...I know James/Jim Morgan AND Jan Windglows are complete Rip-off and Scam Artists whose only desire is to get as much money off their victims then NEVER answer his phone ever again...do not be taken by these CREEPS!!!
DO NOT USE: FAKE Spell Casters James/Jim Morgan or Jan Widnglows do not have magical powers and will only try to scam you for thousands of dollars.

BEWARE - Complete Rip-off !! : 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!! STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!! Complete Scam Spell Casting Rip-off Scheme!!

BEWARE and DO NOT USE: James/Jim Morgan or Jan Windglows unless you want your money stolen from you by these Gypsy Scum 805-455-6548, PO Box #712 Driggs, Idaho 83422..

BEWARE and DO NOT USE: 805-455-6548 James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com
James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows: www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

Business phone: 805-455-6548

emails:
Jan Windglows: passionspells@aol.com
Jim Morgan: wizardmorgan2@aol.com
"Blood Love And Lust Spells" Here are some of James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows sites to beware and not use:

http://www. bloodloveandlustspells.com/ lovespellcastings.html
http://www. bloodloveandlustspells.com/ deathspells.html

http://www. bloodloveandlustspells.com/ ultimatespells.html s.html
http://www. bloodloveandlustspells.com/ magicdisruption.html

http://www. bloodloveandlustspells.com/ removeacurse.html

http://www. bloodloveandlustspells.com/ spellcastingpreviews.html
http://www. bloodloveandlustspells.com/ testamonials.html
http://www. bloodloveandlustspells.com/ orderaspell.html
http://www. bloodloveandlustspells.com/ spellcastinginfo.html

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!! STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!! Complete Scam Spell Casting Rip-off Scheme!!

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!! STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!! Complete Scam Spell Casting Rip-off Scheme!!

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!! STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!! Complete Scam Spell Casting Rip-off Scheme!!

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!! STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist!!!! Complete Scam Spell Casting Rip-off Scheme!!

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!! STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!! Complete Scam Spell Casting Rip-off Scheme!!

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!! STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!! Complete Scam Spell Casting Rip-off Scheme!!

Thank you Rip-off Report.com for exposing these GYPSY SCUM!!!

CONArtist-JimMorganNOTaWizardorMagicalPowers

Park City,
Utah,
USA

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists/Internet Predators James Morgan and Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com-Breach Client Confidentiality,NOT Spellcasters or Psychics,Scam clients for CASH

#45Consumer Suggestion

Tue, September 29, 2009

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists/Internet Predators James Morgan and Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells. com- Breach Client Confidentiality, NOT Spellcasters or Psychics, Scam clients for money then dissappear Complete Rip-off!!

DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardsmorgan2@aol.com . PO Box # 712 Idaho , Driggs, 83422. 805-455-6548 James Morgan and Jan Windglows Breach Client Confidentiality, hack into clients personal computers to take your money out of checking accounts and credit cards; Stalk clients on Internet and post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet; Will NOT cast spells; and worse James Morgan and Jan Windglows are not spell casters or psychics; once they get your money they stop answering the phone!!!! Do not use Western Union or PayPal you will never get your money back from James Morgan and Jan Windglows.

Gypsy SCUM James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows of several spell casting sites on the Global Internet including www.bloodloveandlustspells.com breach client confidentiality and are proven Internet Predators with no magical powers or wizardry. These to Gypsy SCUM will commit deception fraud and Identity Theft and take clients for thousands and thousands of American hard earned dollars. DO NOT USE or be RIPPED OFF by these SCUM idiots who stalk their clients and commit internet fraud by hacking into savings/checking accounts and posting personal information of clients.

Scam James Morgan and Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com NOT A WIZARDS- NOT PSYCHICS-NOT SPELLSCASTERS James/JIM Morgan and Jan Windglows have no magical powers and both are complete SCUM Rip-off Artist Scamming thousands of dollars off innocent CLIENTS...I know James/Jim Morgan AND Jan Windglows are complete Rip-off and Scam Artists whose only desire is to get as much money off their victims then NEVER answer his phone ever again...do not be taken by these CREEPS!!!

DO NOT USE: FAKE Spell Casters James/Jim Morgan or Jan Widnglows do not have magical powers and will only try to scam you for thousands of dollars.

BEWARE - Complete Rip-off !! : 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!! STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!!

BEWARE and DO NOT USE: James/Jim Morgan or Jan Windglows unless you want your money stolen from you by these Gypsy Scum 805-455-6548, PO Box #712 Driggs, Idaho 83422..
James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows: www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

Business phone:805-455-6548
emails:

Jan Windglows - passionspells@aol.com
James Morgan - wizardmorgan2@aol.com

BEWARE and DO NOT USE: 805-455-6548 James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com "Blood Love And Lust Spells" Here are some of James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows sites to beware and not use:

http://www. bloodloveandlustspells.com/ lovespellcastings.html

http://www. bloodloveandlustspells.com/ deathspells.html

http://www. bloodloveandlustspells.com/ ultimatespells.html s.html

http://www. bloodloveandlustspells.com/ magicdisruption.html

http://www. bloodloveandlustspells.com/ removeacurse.html

http://www. bloodloveandlustspells.com/ spellcastingpreviews.html

http://www. bloodloveandlustspells.com/ testamonials.html

http://www. bloodloveandlustspells.com/ orderaspell.html

http://www. bloodloveandlustspells.com/ spellcastinginfo.html

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!! STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!!

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!! STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!!

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!! STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!!

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!! STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist!!!!

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!! STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!!

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com or wizardmorgan2@aol.com NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!! STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!!

Thank you Rip-off Report.com for exposing these GYPSY SCUM!!!

CONArtist-JimMorganNOTaWizardorMagicalPowers

Park City,
Utah,
USA

#45REBUTTAL Individual responds

Sat, November 17, 2007

Jan And I are extremely happy together and are doing very well in life. Jan's site is Booming thank you very much and she's anything but Fat. In fact she's Sexy as Hel_ for your Information. My reputation is better then it's ever been. This just shows everyone that you don't even know us personally Miss Liar. Reveal Yourself or Shut the Hel_ Up. No One is even taking your statements seriously because your hiding behind a factious name on a Bull Sh_ _ Forum site LOL. Tell me who you are Miss or Mr. Chicken Shi_ and we'll start shooting your Bull Shi_ Accusations right out of the sky.

Your nothing but a PUNK that likes to run their mouth off behind the scenes aren't you ?. A little piece of Shi_ that can't or won't make their charges valid by naming yourself and history up here on the forums. Anyone can come up here and blast another person and site without proof you moron LOL. No Big Thing.

Your a BIG Joke and everyone is laughing at you. See, Watch this. Miss Honest Person is a lire. Miss Honest Person is a fake. Miss Honest Person is from two places at once being new York and PA. Miss Honest Person uses different names to post her slander up on this site. Miss Honest Person is a scam and thief. A Rip Off. Miss or Mr. Honest Person in committing Tax Evasion etc. You see anyone can say anything up on this site like what I just said about to you. I don't know you. I haven't ever met you in person however I can say these things just as easily about you as you can say them about Jan and I . The great thing is in the fact I don't have to prove S_ _ _ LOL. Isn't this great.

Your Nothing but a little spec of nothing on the air ways. Just a little hidden COWARD spouting off about this and that to which you know nothing about in the first place. One thing I do know about you is the fact that your a spineless Low Life without a life come to think of it. No one with a life would engage in what your doing that had a life or any scruples about them. So keep writing and submitting your little postings because this is only increasing Jan's business by unbelievable leaps and bounds Fool. Good press & bad press. It's all the same as people are flooding into Jan's site just to see what the hoopla is about. Once they see that Blood Love and Lust Spells is a top notch site they come on in for spells LOL. Thank you so much Miss or Mr. Stupid, I mean Honest Person LOL.KEEP UP YOUR GOOD WORK. Your The Biggest Idiot I've ever seen.

Respond to this Report!

Complaint Review: Jim Morgan - bloodloveandlustspells.com

Jim Morgan - Jan Windglows - bloodloveandlustspells.com Jim Morgan, SpellCaster Scam Artists, and Jan Windglows ripped me off:DO NOT USE -bloodloveandlustspells.com Driggs Idaho

44 Updates & Rebuttals

Jan Windglows & Jim Morgan SUE Career Criminal Mary Prantil of NYC For Stalking, Harrassment, Slander, Liabel, Extortion Crimes READ THE LAWSUIT On SCAM LIAR CRIMINAL Mary Prantil AKA "AmericasDreamer

April 18, 2012 SCAM Alert: Spellcaster Jan Windglows aka Janhet Windglows operates many FAKE SCAM on-line websites to steal your money like www.bloodloveandlustspells.com STOP Jan Windglows.

Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan NOT Affliated With Michael Jenkins OR Any Other Casters Slap A HUGE Civil Lawsuit On Malicious Poster Mary Prantil For Harrassment, FRAUD, Slander, Liabel, MORE INFO HERE

Criminally INSANE Jan Windglows is a Heroin Addict that supports her drug habit by scamming for Spells. Heroin Addict Jan Windglows Jan Windglows is a Heroin Addict, Witchcraft is EVIL

Jan Windglows EXPOSES Mary Prantil aka PsychicNSeattle AKA Phonix Arizona, CRIMINAL COURT RECORDS POSTED HERE ON MARY PRANTIL

5/26 Criminally INSANE Jan Windglows is a Heroin Addict that supports her drug habit by scamming for Spells. Heroin Addict Jan Windglows Jan Windglows is a Heroin Addict, Witchcraft is EVIL.

STOP CYBER Stalker Jan Windglows, stalks NYC Celebrity and X-employee SPELLS DO NOT WORK!!!

STOP Cyber Criminals Jan Windglows -Jim Morgan NYPD to arrest - On-line Ripoff Site Blood Love and Lust Spells

Mary Prantil Lies Does Not Prove Her Statements

High Court Closes Book on Colorful Legal Career

SAN DIEGO At Largehttp://articles.latimes.com/1989-03-31/local/me-603_1_high-court

Blood Love And Lust Spells Exposes Criminals, REAL Gypsy Scum Prantil CLAN

High Court Closes Book on Colorful Legal Career

SAN DIEGO At Largehttp://articles.latimes.com/1989-03-31/local/me-603_1_high-court

Proof with links that Mary Prantil is a two bit liar criminal, LOL

High Court Closes Book on Colorful Legal Career

SAN DIEGO At Largehttp://articles.latimes.com/1989-03-31/local/me-603_1_high-court

SPELLS DON"T WORK -Scammers Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows - Convicted Criminals

BOYCOTT SCAM Jan Windglows CyberStalker and Public Menace - DO NOT USE www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

OpinionatedAmerican - Tampa (USA)

PUBLIC STAY AWAY FROM MARY T. PRANTIL she is psychotic and very dangerous and will be locked up soon and that will be a good thing the streets of New York will be safe again

SCAM Psychic-Janhett T. Windglows: Owner of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 WARNING: Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!

SCAM -805-455-6548 Jan Windglows Will Seek REVENGE on unsatisfied customers who ask for a refund by posting blatant lies on Rip-off Report.com: DO NOT USE: JAN WINDGLOWS or JIM MORGAN

SCAM Psychic-Janhett T. Windglows: Owner of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 WARNING: Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!! DO NOT USE !!!

Jan Windglows Will Seek REVENGE on unsatisfied customers who ask for a refund by posting blatant lies on Rip-off Report.com: DO NOT USE: JAN WINDGLOWS or her employee James or Jim Morgan !!!!

Jan Windglows Will Seek REVENGE on unsatisfied customers who ask for a refund by posting blatant lies on Rip-off Report.com: DO NOT USE: JAN WINDGLOWS or her employee James or Jim Morgan !!!!

SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Owner of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- 805-455-6548 WARNING: www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or passionspells@aol.com PO Box #712 Idaho, Driggs, 83422 . 805-455-Complete

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists SCARY James Morgan and SCARIER Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- Breach Client Confidentiality,NOT Spellcasters or Psychics,Scam clients for CASH

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists/Internet Predators James Morgan and Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com-Breach Client Confidentiality,NOT Spellcasters or Psychics,Scam clients for CASH

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 Con-artists, Internet Predators James Morgan and Jan Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com- Breach Client Confidentiality, NOT Spellcasters or Psychics, Scam clients for money

BEWARE:805-455-6548Con-artists Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money.

ITS UNFAIR TO ACCUSE ALL SPELL CASTERS AND PSYCHICS TO BE PHONEIES THERE ARE SOME REAL GIFTED PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD

Hey Joe, Don't talk To Strangers, LOL. Your A Good Man Joe, Keep Up The Good Work.

I AM NOT A SPELLCASTER AND I THINK THIS IS VERY SAD ADN IT IS FUNNY TOO

IF IT WASN'T SO PATHETIC IT WOULD BE HILLIARIOUS,

BOO h*o BOO h*o BOO h*o THE JOKE IS ON YOU LOL

I WANT PEOPLE TO LOOK IT ALL UP BECAUSE THEN THEY WILL ALL KNOW THE TRUTH. YOU BUNCH OF SCAMS

MR MORGAN really had enough of your bs here's something to make your eyes water

PHONEY CON MAN BLACK MAGIC BALONEY

EVERYBODY KNOWS WHAT THIS STUFF IS...DON'T BOO h*o ABOUT BEING RIPPED OFF!

Raging Against The Machine, Exposing Scam, Protecting The Innocent

Feel The Power, Confidence & Love Of Master Cahill, The Most Honest Spell Caster On The Net.

PRANTIL IS GOING DOWN, BIG TIME

DO NOT USE: Jim Morgan, bloodloveandlustspells;is HARASSING Clients; posting false reports; And is being investigated by Dept of Justice

MARY T. PRANTIL CRIMINAL RECORD

Your Going To Jail Mary Enforcer Of Justice Very Soon

SCAM ARTIST:Jim Morgan;performs DEATH spells;does not return phone calls;does not supply photo of spell;BREACHES CONFIDENTIALITY

Hey GIRL PRANTIL HERE'S YOUR PROOF

Do not use: Bloodloveandlustspells.com or Dragonspells.com -Jim Morgan stole money from me and is a con-artist.

The Honest Person AKA Enforcer On Nothing Monkey On A String

Honest Person AKA Enforcer Of Justice. Enforcer On Nothing

Honest Person AKA Enforcer Of Justice Is A Fake And Low Life

BOO ho BOO ho BOO h*o THE JOKE IS ON YOU LOL