Complaint Review: Jimmy Wakimoto

This seems like a simple concept, person moves into a new apartment for them. 

Finds problems with the unit, landlord is negligent.  He fails to resolve the concerns.

Others including those who claim NOT to be the landlord attack new resident.  Why? 


It has nothing to do with the tenant and the concerns seem typical.  Why defend the slumlord and call the new resident names and then pretend to know what other anonymous reports are made and how and why?

Then ask them to move and wonder why they report? 

They report to make sure the landlord either comes around and offers a product and to protect other consumers, recall what this site is, or that they fail in business.

Are you mentally ill such that you need to ask why this would be done?  Why offer that of others who rented a slum?  They do exist you know?


And enter into this War and Peace drama that spans how many pages over a simple concept?


Slumlords?

You people are a fraud.  You look it for sure.  

To the guy who claimed to be my neighbor who shared the kitchen wall:


I saw you all of three times, the first time I saw you was when I was out near the laundry room with Octavio and you came walking towards the back gate to leave with this nasty mad at the world look on your face, wearing this hoodie and I went to say hi to you but you just shoved past us.  Octavio commented you don't speak to anyone there and are always hostile.  It seems he is right.


I saw you once another day as you walked past my window with the same mad at the world expression and now were glaring into my apartment since the blinds were open and I was talking again to Octavio.


I saw you another time when you came home via the front gate and I was getting my mail at the box and again you said nothing.


Beyond that I was told by more than one person that people had to complain since you music was too loud and beyond those times, that is the only time you laid eyes on me.  Beyond that you can't speak to who was in my apartment when and as you said, they were working in there off and on more often than I even cared to put up with let alone you.  


Your music was less of a concern for me than was the slamming, and I mean slamming of the kitchen cabinets.  And this would go on even at 4am and I know the difference.  Combine that with tossing metal cans into the open cabinet for it to ricochet around in there was all done to make more noise than need be.  Agreed, of late, someone must have spoken to you about it since I mentioned it more than once, and it got better.  I have no problem with that.  I had to say something more than once before that happened.  I said something and I was SICK of it.  You can surmise that.


Your want to ignore all the rest of this since you got told something because you are too loud makes no sense.  The rest of the problems with the property are there beyond YOU!  If you thought the lady was too loud upstairs don't blame that on me.  I knew she was leaving and I was sick of YOU and Jimmy and I ended up getting my things ready since I was not going to wait for Jimmy Wakimoto any more.  It was too little too late and I already said SHE was UPSET for obvious reasons. I went into all of that, I had to eventually stop having her at my place for that reason also, but again I did not use that to claim she did not have termites, asbestos, not working toilets, those had to be fixed by cutting the sidewalk apart for God's sake and you deny you tripped on all of that and complain I MADE NOISE?  You could not hear an abrasive gas powered saw and pavement being broken?  You missed it all.  Again, being mad at her or me for telling you off for being a moron with your music and door bashing is your problem not mine.  You had to have been told since you got quiet eventually and I was ok with that and thankful for it.  


Your complaints of me never were expressed and your claim I was evicted is also false, my obligation with Wakimoto is over and he is paying for this and so are you by that.  I know how to do that and I am doing it now.  You made no effort to resolve anything with me and nor did he since you are both wrong, you had no basis to complain about me since you are at fault.  Face it, at 4am I am in bed sleeping and so is everyone else.  Your are playing music and slamming your "Fish" onto the counter and doing a Babe Ruth on the kitchen cabinets which now act as speakers on my side of the wall. It was not appropriate and your kind offer to me and the people at large that this is an apartment and you get some noise is really generous of you. Since you knew that and how to use that to make noise, I agree with you.  I had to let them know right away what you are up to.  The thing about me moving and making noise?  Nonsense, I walked in with a duffel bag, had to clean a dirty apartment, moved in basically nothing other than that, and the rest was a few things shipped by FedEx and UPS.  I did not invest real heavy in Wakimoto up front for a reason and I am glad I did not.  I made sure to hedge my bets in case this happened.  Again, you can't speak to what you did not witness and you did not witness anything and if you can't locate the termites and roaches and other broken crap including the crap broken in my place, or the asbestos addendum you were given, then you sir are blind.  Put that hoodie back on and go take your nasty attitude and be the big player in the neighborhood since clearly this is what you want to be.  I don't care, I was sick of hearing you, and you remain part of the problem and not part of the solution.  


You are again a day late and a dollar short.  Don't kiss and make up now, you are leaving, so what do you care?  Wakimoto's word is not worth a d**n and he is apt to tell anyone you rent to from here anything and it will not matter. Kissing his behind so he can screw someone else for all that in his place he will never fix makes you look worse than blind, you might as well work for him pretending you know how to wire a place properly and you don't.  You never fixed her kitchen outlets if so and never fixed my place either.  I could add something about the service feeds and location of the meter panels but I'll save that for another day.  Maybe next year I will come back and revisit some other things to let you know how they turn out.  As Wakimoto said of me "You aren't in a hurry are you", no Jimmy I am not in a rush here at all. I have all the time and money in the world.  


But again "Hoodie Guy", your fish story is just that, another fishy story and combine it with your blatant ignore of basic and obvious repair concerns that ALL residents of that place experienced and still do experience makes you look like the one who is full of crap.  So keep your offers of "@HIT" to yourself since I am not having or putting up with yours any more.  You lie like a rug son and you need a serious attitude check.  I am sure walk around that place like you do and some day somebody will wipe that smile right onto your face, count on that.  Go tell your stories to someone else, I am sick of you and nobody here will believe you.


At first I thought it was the person on the other side and I had no problem with him and we talked, most of that is since Hoodie Guy's story made no sense and was not consistent with anything including the layout of the apartments.  Beyond that he must have never lived there since he can't see the termite tracks all over or see the sewer work going on and if you can't see or hear that then you can't hear me either and if you can't see the broken wiring then you have no idea who is in my place when.  Unless you put a hole in the wall to see if it was me making that noise when YOU slammed your cabinet doors.  Think about all that.


To the other folks who lived there, I hope things work out for you and that you find another place.  It is a shame we never got to be friends or get very far but I can't be exposed to all the things going on there including the insecticides and construction mess and maybe that works for you but it does not for me.  I have no hard feelings towards any of you, this is about your Slumlord and Wakimoto knows that.  So do you likely.  So burn that bridge when you are off it, I plan to.  And eventually you will realize you are paying for all the people like me who are putting it to Jimmy for what they did to them.  This is going to be why you won't get anywhere with him since he is getting his pants sued off for obvious reasons.  I'd invest in a ship that has not sunk. 


The rest of this I will leave as is for now, all you need is written up top and Steve would send Kim to start all over again with "Really?  Where did you live and what was the problem" but we never seemed to be talking about that did we?  You were too busy being clever attempting to blame me for something and this is not inconsistent with what I offered was going on anyway.  Not much more I can say other than calling a slum a slum and a slumlord a slumlord.  I guess you'd need to accept that when you see it.  And to "Hoodie Guy" or others who'd invent new ways to call me a liar without actually coming out and saying it?  I'd say you look to be the fakes and the liars to me and all other will see that now.  You lied to me, you lie to others here and they see that, I made the effort and you did not, and they know the truth here.  I'd put my character against yours or anyone's since I pay to give you the truth, even if it costs me something and it usually does, you get the straight story from me.   And your attempts to turn apartment defects into mine and announce they are not there puts you in the liar liar pants on fire category along with Wakimoto who has a vested interest to lie to you.  I do not.  I have no reason to do this or to lie about it.  And you agree "Hoodie Guy" you saw me and I was there so you claim to know me so I did witness this.  Those who really would know me will tell you there is not one thing in that property that I could not repair, replace, design, build, test, install, remove, specify, or otherwise know is working or not and why and possibly for how long etc.  Going down that road or scratching that surface with me will likely have you getting deeper and deeper lost in the feeling and sinking sentiment I know a thing or two and likely more than you, Octavio, Jimmy, and the meter man combined.  Consider that also before you call me a name, or pretend to know what goes on in my place, in my head, or what I did and did not witness. 

But to make that story shorter "Hoodie Guy", nobody cares what you think now, you can't speak to what went on between Jimmy and I anyway and it would not matter. And he'd lie to anyone else about all of it as he did to me.  I can add nothing further and should not need to.  Like all of this I've been expected to put up with far too much and NONE of this was necessary either, what I said here is true, none of you came here to date to offer anything other than nonsense to what I wrote.  That is obvious by now.  You'll do that once with me.  That is it.  The rest I will leave to your government and the law.  Good luck.

Next stop - Lord of the Flies, when we hit 60,000 words.

Ok, so on to more important things. How we see the world is not the world itself; the map is not the territory. There will always be differences between our map (i.e. our mind/model/view) and the territory (i.e. "reality"). Our work will have the ultimate goal of getting our maps more in sync with the territory. 

Before we start, please make sure you are familiarized with Occam's razor and Bayesian probability. Trust me, brother, your life is about to be changed. 

But the problem of course is this is NOT a game, putting people in this kind of risk and taking advantage of them is not funny.  I have a lot of money, and can easily afford this, others might not and end up homeless.  Really it is no game and there are some serious health concerns at that place.  This is the point and the problem.  I see maybe you'd like to find fault with me, but I am not the problem.  Your want to do that just to get back at me, puts others at risk since then they'd act on YOUR information (Disinformation) and they should not.  There is little hazard to passing Jimmy Wakimoto and 616 Orange Avenue Long Beach, CA 90802 over for the next better place, since you do have other choices.  You won't end up dead because you took less risk and decided to go with plan B.  There is no down side to it and you can shop someplace else.  This is the idea and the other failed premise with your arguments. I won't speak to why you'd attempt to protect him, even at or not at my expense, the end result is the same.  I suffer some harm by you and yours, I am done with Jimmy, you may end up helping him hurt other people.  Consider that.  Oh and so you know, I'd bet you can find tens of thousands of other slumlord posts here and other places on the net. I bet I can open the phone book and name ten of them in a small city you don't know much about.  It is that simple.  I prefer to avoid them and when I do find them, let others know about it as I move on to better places.  You may cause others harm here by your actions is the problem and to be fair, I don't need the drama, but I can accept it as such.  And you need to help ME to help you. I am taking care of business, you need to let me do that.  If this was about something less important, say a book purchase or a tool purchase or something not of critical value then this is one thing, I think you offer a callous and lacking in respect of it all approach to the situation.  To be fair again.  This is not internet fiction we are talking about here or Seinfeld.

Steve says now -- "You get as much a kick out of all this as I do, friend. All in the game, as they say."

So you have changed your tune again, I thought since my comment about bigger fish to fry has you running back to word count to support the fact my life depended upon making you take more or less LSD to make sense of this?  All so you can complain about how much I type?  What way do you want it now?  But again, I said that, I enjoy this and making slumlords like this guy pay for it.  I don't disagree with you on that.  I love this actually, I just wished that it worked out since I wanted to live there.  Part of the problem obviously.

Steve says now -- "One little nugget I wanted to discuss; you said:"

Really?  I had a lot of them but since they served in pointing out how YOU were wrong and not me, you won't address them? I'd say fair enough but not really.  But you quote me now in saying the following --  "Most people will write you off for attempting to be contrary to me"

First off, my actual statement is and was -- "Most people will write you off for attempting to be contrary to me by the portions you claim and pretend to know about and by what you claim, it is not possible for you to make your claims as such. "

So there is what I ACTUALLY wrote up there, you changed it and made it something it is not.  Then:

Steve says now -- "Throughout this thread, you have said stuff to the effective of, "everybody can now see that you are wrong and I am right!". If that is the case, why have the only people that have posted on here NOT seen it that way? You would think, if your logic is so obviously right, that people would be posting in droves to point that out. "

My point in all of that is that we don't know all of who posted here and why.  When I read all kinds of things I agree with and don't need to debate, I don't feel a need to argue about them and it is possible only the people who don't understand or who'd have some other reason show up to find fault with me, hard to know.  I won't offer conjecture and this is why I asked up front and did so MANY TIMES why you wanted to know what you claimed you knew and then asked of me later since it had no merit.  And you could not know it.  My points are that you did do just that, and you could not have, and then your other approaches were dishonest and evasive and when all is said and done you look just like the landlord who did basically the same thing.  Show up, pretend he was going to fix something, fix part of it, mess it up, and then when all is said and done, we got nowhere.   You just wrecked the different train on his behalf in the same way and it is about as dishonest as his evasive constructs and video on the website.  You come to find fault with me in ways you could not and then offered clever ways to boat around all of that.  Plus you diagnosed me which was way wrong.  It seemed to work for a while for you but then I had to keep pointing out the obvious flaws in it.  You failed to concede ANY point at all and I stand by the claim that makes you look bad.  I see it that way and others will also.  I make the effort and you do not, or the effort you make is misguided and an effort to mislead.  Mine is here to offer truth and enlightenment, at the risk of seeming overly preachy, I am not going for that.  Point is I am attempting to make people aware of things beyond just the facts of this is a slum.  It is free, accept it or don't, maybe just be amused or entertained, I don't care.  This gives me something to do as well as get it off my chest.  Wakimoto should be made to pay AND clean up his act or get out of the business he is in.  Simple enough.  And you seem to want to offer more smoke and chaff to the debate, I seeing it as being over at the top and you just want to belabor it, make it more upsetting, make it something it is not, etc.  You seem to go away from the truth and I attempt to get us back there, that is all.

Steve says now -- "You mention you are writing other reports; I am looking forward to it. Please let me know where these are, so we can continue our discussions there. Come on, brother: help me to help you."

Are you just going to end up back at comment one all over again and make the same flawed arguments without ever meeting me?  I could call you a odd as such and likely be right.  Did you want to go there also?  After all I'd not want you to get lost in the truth anyplace around here, would you?  Well you will know where to find them and how when I do write them, just use your "Cosmic Artificially Intelligent Lexical Analyzer And Medical Miracle Schizophrenia Producer" software that scans the entire internet for my postings by reading it all, understanding none of it, not knowing me or meeting me once, and then coming up with completely bogus claims about anything you'd like possibly by using the Zodiac.  Beyond that I don't know what to tell you.  But on the contrary, I am going plenty of places, I won't be chained to this misery at all nor will I be chained by you and yours.  See you.

Here is what Kimberly said initially - "I have to agree with Steve here. Your report does border on the irrational."


She goes on to say - "Your post started out well, it listed the complaints you had and it made it sound like you were a RATIONAL person with RATIONAL complaints. Then you start rambling with a bunch of incoherent crap."


I'd not agree with irrational, incoherent, and the points I make you seem to miss, all of you, that being you have no knowledge and can't know to make the claims you do or refute mine.  But then again you offer terms like crap and I think all of what you say here is pure cat puke, how does that work for you "Sweety"?  Later you will feign some amount of harm and me being "Hostile" and here is your chance to see you as being "An Aggresive FemiNazi", does that seem good and well and a shoe that fits?  Try it on.  :)  It is also possible I don't proofread as sloppily as you do and miss spelling and grammar errors too hard to know for sure since this is not spoken word, you forgot that too didn't you?  Oh and where is the border, do you draw that line or do we need the US Customs and INS here?


Kim goes back to the same flawed premise Steve tripped on initially with his diagnosis and now hers, all of which are wrong, and point out you don't know when I lived there, when I moved in, who I am, and if I moved out yet or did already - "Steve, is also right in that IF you are so unhappy with your current living situation, why not move out? You could still post your complaints AND not be living there. However, they will still be valid because you HAD lived there."


And then she says her point there is moot anyway, so why bother with it?  Again you offer indirect support using vagaries to support his claims in total but want some amount of deny-ability in doing so.  In other words you want the mud fight but don't want to get dirty is the problem.  And this is how you are doing it.  Like your other points that being incoherent and irrational and Schizophrenic, to which Kim agreed with and then offers this as additional bolster of that failed premise, or did you care to offer something else with incoherent and ramblings was it?  Again, you cite nothing specific and this is likely your intent that way I could actually discuss it, again your constructs and approaches to dialog are designed to lead me into a dead end.  If you had specific concerns you'd cite them and you do pretend that you do by offering quotes of things that really you can't dispute and then make vague claims about the other items I talk about specifically but you make no rebut of them.  It leads me to cite you as being intentionally dishonest by design and not of interest in coming to a consensus.  In other words you are just like a bad landlord.  You can prove me wrong with that claim but I bet you won't do that.  You can do that by finding fault with specific items you'd wish to claim don't work for you, I see none of that other than again, vague offers of color and choice of adjectives such as "Incoherent", which really would be opinion if you actually spoke face to face with me. Again not likely you'd ever get there.  But you can't know either.


She (Kim) goes on to say - "First of all in no way did I state anywhere that you were schizophrenic, you are confusing me with another poster."


But you are offering support for that flawed premise, this is why you offer your flawed opinion of incoherent and rambling and flavor my dialog here with that, or was there another point you are making about me personally who you have never met?  You never pointed out Steve's flawed approach and spoke against it and you offer support of him in general.  You'd then hide behind the non specificity of your claims and blame me for coming to the wrong conclusion you wanted me and everyone else to come do.  That being?  See again, you don't actually say much of anything.


She (Kim) goes on to say - "Second of all, you accuse others of assuming things about you, YET you turn around and do the same things to us but that is ok right?"


I don't assume anything about you and never did, I make no claims about you other than you can't know me and much about me at all. I can also specifically speak to you not being able to see the fact you can't be doing as you do since you keep doing it despite me explaining how you can't know.  I could be Bill Gates sitting here typing this and you'd not know it.  I could also be Colin Powell and you'd not know that either.  Keep in mind actual medical diagnosis was being offered as fact, you are still going down that road.  That is a problem. Steve claimed that of me, being Schizophrenic,  and you offer support of it but seemed to be too clever about not coming out and claiming it, just making vague suggestions it was true.  I don't assume anything about you, but I can guess a few things, I can make the claims about you that you are 100% wrong about me, this is fairly simple and others can do that also.  Since you don't know me, again, and can not make those claims as you'd suggest here.  Others will know that also and agree.


I accuse you of making inaccurate claims about me here that you could not properly make and that is valid, you want to just invert the process I apply to this property and offer that you could just rate me accordingly and you can't.  You'd offer that you can review me like I am some kind of apartment you just rented and then you can find all the ills with me since we use the same website to do it.  It don't work that way.  At the risk of being repetitive which it seems you need to get the idea.....You don't know me and can not refute any claim I make anywhere just by reading what I write here.  You can cite me for spelling errors, grammar, swear words, and flawed logic, but you won't find much of that maybe swear words, but the rest is concrete and you won't touch it.  You also can not remove or deny collusion or speak to the fact or claim that there is and was none here at all.  You may in fact collude with Wakimoto, I can't know that, and you may collude with others and/or Steve, Robert, and Stacey. I like the Police will consider the list of possible suspects to be all people.  I don't close my mind to things like you do since many things are possible, there is no evidence to rule ANY of that out.  In fact you might be supporting those notions even more by your actions here that seem off color and smell wrong.  See my points above about painting targets on victims, yes I am one, I will say that again, you need to get used to it since I will keep doing that all along.  If you have trouble with that you need to find out why and let us know since there should be none.


You can't know what you claim to know based on written text posted here, it has NO medical value at all.  I accuse you of making those false claims and then add complaint about it being too much to read while doing all that they do and did to ask for more, as in keep twisting my toe and then b***h cuz I b***h about it.  That I can do without ANY problem at all since I read what you write about me and it is wrong.  You can't support it in any way.  End of story.  That and it was done, Steve just wants to move forward from it without owning up to it and now used other approaches to put it in his past.  I keep putting it in front of us again where it needs to be since you keep shining your rose colored light on it.



She (Kim) goes on to say - "I could not care one whit whether if you still live there or not! Your post would be a valid one whether if you lived there or not. HOWEVER, when you get into oh this person is colluding with other persons against me it does pull down the credibility of what you are posting."


Ok agreed on that point, glad you made sense of that one, again we started out right away with what I said all along, why don't you just move.  Again, it is defeatist to make such obvious suggestions along with the "Diagnosis" that was made, it was designed to offer stigma and blame, face it. I called him on it and call you on it also now.  So now you go back and fix part of it, ok. What next?   You've never seen others collude in anything?  Then you are naive in how the world works since people share information and act on it, even if they are wrong. So what?  Did you care to discuss the termites or any real issue there?  No?  Why not?  You still are not there are you?  Have any of you ONCE even mentioned ANY of the real concerns?  NOPE..... Why?  People who have things to hide invent ways to get away with breaking the law, open your mind to ways that might be done and see if you can fit my suggestions here into how those like Wakimoto put folks down to get them to go along.  Try just a little bit to see how this would work and how con men set up their marks.  You need to be receptive to thinking a little here.  As you said, I make the effort, you need to also.


She (Kim) goes on to say - "I come to this site to read credible reports of people who have been defrauded so that I may be warned of who or who not to deal with. It is my responsibility to decide if I want to believe in the posts and rebuttals or not."


Ok and you do that by tossing mud on everyone and see what sticks?  Why would I bother going through all this?  Just for no reason and as someone else suggested I just pick these out of a hat and snipe at landlords?  That is nuts Kim, who is that bored?  Not me.


She (Kim) goes on to say - "I do not appreciate your using your disability as an excuse for anything! You make the rest of us who are disabled look bad. Hmm, but you wouldn't have known that I was disable by ANY of my posts if I had not just told you. Wonder why that would be? Could it be because I do not use my disability as an excuse?"


Who said I used it as an excuse, you just played the victim and you are not, and did so by blaming the victim.  This is what is being done here and by you.  I don't need to know that so you in effect accused me of what you are doing now you hide behind your handicap because you sniped at me and took advantage of me and apply stigma to me by using mine against me.  This makes you look bad and not me.  Where in all of this did I use my handicap as ANY excuse?  Not once.  You want to invent something in it and then use it to toss this and me out with it.  Shame on you and not me.  You can't see that?  That is not fair at all.   How does my handicap disrespect yours that I don't know or NEED to know is there.  This is the point.  You also missed all of that.  You never asked what it was either, you just went ahead and did what you wanted, not my fault.


She (Kim) goes on to say - "I too, have had bad landlords over the years and have lived in some pretty crappy places. Does my experience equal yours? I doubt it, because no two experiences are ever the same. However, you did not see me coming here and posting that people were out to get me because of my disability or found fault with me somehow."


I never said anyone was out to get me, you said that.  Where did that come from?  So with your first statement there you'd admit this is all plausible, so why bother making more out of it than it is not?  Someone does not want to fix their place and force you to live in their crap, simple enough.  You are too busy judging me for my reaction to it and how I need to act somehow different based on all you don't see.  Too bad, that makes your witness beyond impossible, that being useless.


She (Kim) goes on to say - "Your posting would have been much more credible, coherent, and easier to believe if you had simply stated your facts. Stated that you have filed reports and the like with the local authorities and left it at that. Bringing your disability into it, AND bringing some collusion and everyone is out to get me into it, simply wipes out any credibility in your posting."


My posting is more credible since I offered more about what is going on AND I am willing to defend it despite people like you making something out of it that it is not.  Your suggestions and the structure of them are by their own merits and design, dishonest.  The things you suggest and the manner in which you do it are designed to be deceptive and misleading about me, and the claims you make you can not know.  You return to lack of coherence and there is none, you just are not able to understand all of it or how it would work and instead of asking for clarification you run for the pill bottle and hope to sedate me for making too much sense, typing too much, and having more knowledge than you do. I was there, I have more info than you ever will, you need to accept that of course.  And you are not me.  So next?


She (Kim) goes on to say - "I am not here slandering you or saying that you are mentally ill or whatever. So stop assuming as you are telling everyone else to do. I am simply pointing out in a very nice way the reasons people are having a bit of a problem swallowing your story."


You offered support for the same flawed premise and never got on board for the reasons, obvious ones, why it could not be done the way it was offered, in other words you were sinking the boat in the same way using a different drill below the waterline but hoped nobody heard you making more holes, get the idea?  So you'd need to open your mouth, or type actually that you agree Steve was wrong and explain why.  You got part of the way there by pointing out the snipe about "Why don't you move" made no sense in the overall context.  Recall I went through all of that.  Just now are you realizing that simple aspect of something we fixed about three days ago.  Now you are caught up or no?


She (Kim) goes on to say - "If you have had legitimate problems with this landlord, post it out for others to know so that they may avoid him, file complaints with the local authorities, if you don't want to move, then file a lawsuit against him to force him into compliance, also file to have your rent withheld until compliance is met."


This is what I am doing isn't it?  Did we agree this is what is happening here?  Again, you are too busy finding fault with me to listen to what I had to say and my offer of why it is being done since on the surface it goes against sound business practice.  I went into all of that.  It seems to be about more than just the money, you could not see that or did not want to since you wanted to get lost in "Nemesis", "World View", "Ramblings", "Incoherent", and other things that would offer you don't know how to read.


She (Kim) goes on to say - "You tell me to go watch TV like I am some child. My posts are just as valid IF not MORE valid than yours. People post on here for advice and answers. You may not always like the answers you get. If you want people to respect you, then respect them as well."


No they are not just as valid since you have no witness and make claims and support claims about things with no knowledge of them.  You and Robert and Steve and Stacey disrespect me and then expect something else back.  You complain about ramblings and it seems at least one of you has a favorite target or more in Rita, Smoothie guy etc so you must take this on as a hobby and when you get people to talk to you, then if they talk too much, or have a lot to say, then you have pill bottle for them. This IS where all that went.  You got on board for that also and I said if you can't read all this, then change the channel.  I don't need you to make this work and I can do it with or without you.  Either way works this is all good for me, I don't have a problem with making you look bad too.


She (Kim) goes on to say - "I have done nothing to you other than to offer valid advice. Yet YOU tell me to go watch TV?"


No you said I offer "Incoherent Crap" and that I don't agree with.  And you supported Steve in his "Diagnosis".  Do you help him with his LSD and Meth habits also?  I don't owe you an apology either, you all owe me one. I don't need your advice at all is the truth and you offered none I could use anyway other than "Why don't you move?", did you think I did not think of that?  Again, next time you purchase a new car that is a lemon, why don't you just drive it anyway and not complain about it?  Does that sound like good advice too?  


She (Kim) goes on to say - "You become very hostile when people question your story. If you cant handle questions or advice then I would suggest not putting your problems on the internet. Not every poster is going to handle you with kid gloves and say, "oh this poor man, we should feel sorry for him because he is handicapped." Sorry, no dice here. I too have a disability and the last thing I want is pity and the last thing I will do is pity another person because of a handicap. Just because you are disabled does not mean the world owes you anything."


You offer "Hostile" subsequent to "Incoherent Crap" and "Ramblings" and "Schizophrenia" and you can't know that either.  Eventually one gets tired of the lame too many words defense of those who like to toss medical problems on folks they can't listen to and need not since they were foolish enough not to mind their own business to begin with.  Why stifle my witness with your ignorance?  Do ripped off people have to be pleased about it when you act like a fool about it? I suggest if you can't take the heat my dear get out of the kitchen.  Since this is a hot one, you better bring the shades and sunscreen, you'll need it around here with me and that is fine by me and too d**n bad for you and Wakimoto.  I don't owe you a d**n THING!


She (Kim) goes on to say - "Does my disability equal yours? Can I say we suffer the same consequences due to our disabilities? No, yet a disability is just that a disability. It does not make us any less of a person."


There is no relevance to that statement or line of thought since you never mentioned it and I never implied it of you. You did of me and actually made other claims you never could support.  Again, YOU make no sense and this is really off in left field.  I have no knowledge of you and your handicap and made no offer I did and do not now.  It is of no merit to my claims here.  Nor is my handicap of use to you.  If in fact I do have one, again, this is my business to know and to worry about.  See you don't know me and now it seems you don't even know what I said and short of making claims I never made, this is how you got to these failed premises I quote you on above.  I think you wanted to find a way I made a slam against you by using info I don't have, it ain't so dear.


She (Kim) goes on to say - " It does not mean that the world owes us. It just means there is something that we cannot do. It SOUNDS like you are a very bitter person. I can understand that as I felt the same when my disability first reared its ugly head. You will only help yourself when you start accepting it. I should know, been there done that, moved on. You will only help yourself when you realize that your disability is just a PART of who you are and not ALL of what you are. You will also only help yourself when you stop using your disability as an excuse and when you stop allowing your disability to be everything."


Again, I think you now go back and attempt to undo what you did and this seems to now point out you can accept I'd be upset. So what is it? Come out and take a stand on something.  I really don't need you to tell me it is ok to be upset since as you can see here, I am not backtracking at ALL on anything and if nothing else I am making an EFFORT.  This is also called good faith.  You and yours offered BAD faith right up front.  Your want to play the victim at my hand ain't so either and I see that as an obvious ploy to make me look bad.  It won't work that way.


She (Kim) goes on to say - "You say that we do not know you. However, do you not realize that much of what we are seeing and talking about is from YOUR posts. Much can be learned about a person by what he/she posts or how they post. Much can be learned through simple observation. Obviously, you have learned NOTHING about me and only choose to take offense and get mad because I don't fully agree with you. If you truly read my post you would see that I was a kind person who offered you a bit of advise."


No Kim actually I don't think you can learn anything from what I say here let alone ANYTHING about me since it seems you can't read.  If you could, you'd read what I wrote and make sense of it and see how this works.  You would also see the hazard in offering medical advice that can't be made, as I said, and offering such other diagnostics that can't be done as you and yours did to me here.  You can't even understand that termites are present and then you invent that I've insulted the handicap you have but I never claimed to know it.  How could I?  So with that, I don't think you can tell ONE d**n THING ABOUT ME.  And no doctor would act on ANY of this to offer me ANY kind of diagnosis but you and Stacey and Steve and Robert claim to be able to.  With that I offer you as today's Ripoff Report Four Stooges!  Good Luck to you since you are going to need it.  

You get as much a kick out of all this as I do, friend. All in the game, as they say.

One little nugget I wanted to discuss; you said:

 "Most people will write you off for attempting to be contrary to me"

Throughout this thread, you have said stuff to the effective of, "everybody can now see that you are wrong and I am right!". If that is the case, why have the only people that have posted on here NOT seen it that way? You would think, if your logic is so obviously right, that people would be posting in droves to point that out. 

You mention you are writing other reports; I am looking forward to it. Please let me know where these are, so we can continue our discussions there. 

Come on, brother: help me to help you.

And you support selling drugs to others, then why not you just tell us what happened and we can rename this website something like "Steve's view on what is wrong in your current business relationships and why all the crooked things in the world are really YOUR fault".

Does that sound good? This is why I asked you how many hairs are on my head since you know it all and you can speak to soooooooo much about me personally! 

See that was only a few words and all the rest and I mean ALL of it, was covered already in detail and at length.  Including your offers of Schizophrenia, addressed all that, my injuries, discussed all that, etc.  So you missed it along the way. 

I'll leave you to fester in your own ignorance and argue about me behind my back.  Have fun.

I could have been the worst tenant in the world, I was not, I was too busy getting him to fix my place and we never had the chance, but it would not matter.  None of that changes any of the reality there and makes asbestos, termites, roaches, broken plumbing, and all that go away.   Just those alone are enough to look to live someplace else. Unless you prefer to live outback in the dumpster, but I won't speak to what you will put up with.  In other words as a "Concerned Neighbor" take your complaints and toss them since you made no effort to resolve them, I did and that and nothing else was fixed.  Burden again was not on me to perform and I never heard anything about anyone else with a problem with me.  Don't come to me now and say YOU had a problem with ME.  It never happened. I never heard about it anyway.  Did you write me a letter or serve me court papers?  Or claim anyone else did? Or that I was evicted?  It never happened.  And it won't there for certain.  Now you offer that Wakimoto has legal recourse against me based on your say so and not being party to our agreement?  You keep writing checks you can't cash son.  You might as well offer that Octavio cut my left arm off with his abrasive saw he was not using to dig the hole in the walk to repair the perfectly working sewer drain from the unit upstairs.  Since you obviously are a medical expert too why not offer more cures for the common cold that I caught from you?

 Again you offer vague suggestions about things you could never prove and use the "No Names" defense of that and the suggestion of a problem resident, maybe that was you?  And he was being polite?  But we don't know that either.  You are partly right though, Wakimoto has trouble with me and he made it.  He started it, I am going to finish it.  You got that notion by reading the concerns here correct?  You must have sensed that somehow?  Or did you miss the obvious again?  I won't need to add that this is sarcasm, you are familiar with that?


And then you offer that I can only be the victim of ONE crime in my life and being so would preclude that Wakimot rented me a slum, that he is not a slumlord by that, and that none of the obvious problems with his property are ANYTHING but me?  Right, so that makes no sense either.  


All of your lies are just that, crap and lies. They stink just like Jimmy Wakimoto lies.  And that is going to be the problem with people who create victims, they won't like them.  You seem to fit that category all too well for some reason, why is that?  Oh and by the way, how do you prepare your fish?  The same way you prepare your victims?  By beating them up?  Is your "Fish" tender now?  Good enough to eat?  Or do you want some Adolph's Fish Tenderizer and some of my pity party sauce to wash it down with?  You and poor Jimmy Wakimoto can enjoy that one on me and have some Asbestos, Termite, and Cockroach Mousse for dessert.  It is all free, you are buying. Jimmy need not send boys to do a man's job, you don't serve him well in all you do here.  Better men have tried than you, and you won't stop me from making Wakimoto's life miserable over this.  Count on that.

And again, you are too quick to point out and find fault with me and I have warned you already in advance I am NOT telling you everything for a reason.  And that seems not to matter since you already made a ton of claims you could never prove let alone experts who'd be able to.  For instance I could have a theft claim against him, possibly Jimmy stole from me, or Octavio did, or I was threatened, you can not show up here and pretend to know all the concerns and you don't need to.  I have told YOU what YOU need to know for now NOT TO RENT HERE.  Those as I outlined are enough to send you elsewhere and this and the lack of ethic is enough.  You are too busy attempting to be contrary to ALL that I say here and you in fact can not be contrary to ANY of it, you just don't know that yet.  Most people will write you off for attempting to be contrary to me by the portions you claim and pretend to know about and by what you claim, it is not possible for you to make your claims as such.  They are preposterous in other words and could NOT be known to you.  Again, my bet there is that you attempt this to be a simple inversion of my vanity that you attempt to make, it is misguided and foolish to attempt to do so.  You should have thought about it first and why it might backfire on you.  Too late now.  Too  late for Jimmy.

But I had that also, much of what you do is bigoted, prejudicial and you resort to naive and base accusations and colored remarks designed to be as slurs.   Common gutter tripe is the concept and base stereotypical slams about people and their histories you know nothing about with your dose of self-envisioned medical expertise based on your lifelong list of felonies as a pharmacist and dope pusher.  And you offer it as fact and you have no offer of proof other than written words here that explain why your are wrong and point out defects in your slum, excuse me, apartment.  It is a slum.  Did you take offense to that?  Why? Move out, you have better choices, it is ok for me, so it must be ok for you to have to move, no skin off my back after all.  You love to carry furniture around and waste money right?  Who don't?  What now, complain about all the moving in and moving out and packages that need to get delivered so they can get moved out 2 months later and the rest tossed in the trash?  Guess what?  That won't change any time sooon with this guy so get used to it.  How many people moved in the last three months?  You get the idea and know why your argument is lost, face the facts.

And for Steve who cited other reports, next time you read the newspaper or watch the news or read CNN on the web be sure to discount all of it since the authors complain so much.  You don't even know those reports are mine, how could you?  You don't know a thing about me and you offer you did this how?  By writing style?  Not possible, and by you? Who by your own admission is a drug user and dope pusher, you admitted that here.  You expect us to take your analysis as anything but being deranged and/or dishonest?  The LSD and Meth won't help you any now you claim to know who writes what anonymous posts here and then claim they are mine and someone else's?  It is not possible. You don't make sense, your logic does not, you keep running into the same wall, I was patient with you and now you just keep tossing dirt around that you turn into dirt and you seem obsessed with this and why?  Do you not have a life?  Do you just find you need to show up and find fault with people who have concerns?  Are you in the Chamber of Commerce or so so so so pro-business?  What is in it for you makes me wonder and why can't you just let it go?  You can't claim or pretend to know more than 90% of what you cite as fact, but you still do and keep going back there once you admit you are wrong.  You end up going back again with the same flawed reasoning.  Are you sure you only found now many reports you thought were mine?  How many?  Are you sure, is that the right ones, are there more maybe?  Can you find them?  What makes them wrong, since you were not there either I assume, you never claimed to even KNOW those businesses either.  Do you know Wakimoto?  Of those other reports, do you know about any of them?  Can you be sure they are mine and as such would they not be true?  And why?  You won't know.  I could be a Federal Housing inspector and you'd not know that either.  I may visit 100s of properties a year and you'd not know that either.  Would you?  

Who wrote the other reports?  You claim that is me?  You can't know that and it would not matter, who knows even how you'd arrive at this list of reports you now cite.  You don't even know who typed the other comments in this report on this thread let alone any others beyond your own, again you offer proof where there is none.  You announce defect and diagnosis when there is no need and no proof but then you claim to be able to offer some kind of medical ethic that allows you get right things that many physicians will get wrong, how is that Steve?  More Meth gone to your head?  You live in a drug induced fantasy land that has you harvesting other reports online and tossing them in with mine and using the notion that more than one report by someone means they are all bad.  Again, no logic to that at all.  You offer another dead horse to be beaten to death again, and then want to complain about the dead horse you showed up with and the fact YOU are hitting on it with that broken baseball bat.  You got lost in your first comment and came here to harass me since this is what it now is.  Verbal harassment of someone who made a report and you just can't stand to hear it.   So you showed up to make a mess and to call me names.  That is the end of it.  You do offer just that as that.  Anyone other than you can see it.

You convened the same lynch mob right here for others to see what you are all about, thanks.

Another point of fact you don't know is that here, or any other place I have been that you did, did not, or would claim to read about or find a report about you though I wrote, I could have been stabbed, shot, run into, run over, and otherwise attacked since I can name about 50 high crime areas on the west coast alone, I can name more, and that would make most of what you say nonsense as well. I could have been injured in Long Beach for what went on, did you ask that?  No and why not?  Were the police involved in this report or any of the others?  Do you know that?  Were arrests made other than of you and for your drug use and sales?  It might mean something you never know, but for you it seems not much does matter since you can't read and understand English.

But again as I said, you just wanted to find fault with me and this is what this is turning out to be you can't deny that even though you seem to always avoid any real question as to what you need to know that for and how it relates.  Your dwelling on the insignificant and tangential makes it what it is.  You had ample opportunity to make sense and to see you made a number of false claims about people named anonymous who you don't know.  You don't even know when I lived in Long Beach, what year, or anyplace else for that matter.  You know that and so do I.  Care to keep guessing about things you have no knowledge of?  Getting it wrong that many times makes you go back the bench hoping this pitcher gets tired.  My arm tossed fast balls all day long and you are going to miss them all.  After all I pitch left handed and you can't decide if you want to hit them or run. 

I have a dozen more reports to write and you won't know them either and you wont stop me and none of them makes this one less than what it is or makes you any more than a loser.  One has nothing to do with the other and they all have to do with me and people like you.  Again sir, you are a liar and a felon and I don't need to know you and I don't want to.  Good luck.

I won't comment here more since you keep ranting in this monotonous loop that goes nowhere and adds nothing new.  Other witness from residents adds nothing since nobody talked to me at all and they can't speak to what Wakimoto did in my place and don't know when I was there at all or when Octavio or anyone else worked there, so they are out of luck also.  Basic facts are up top and the rest I filled in as to why, you people offered support by adding harassment here, I'd now characterize it as just that.  Baseless offers of fact and proof about things you have no witness of and are likely impossible anyway, so beyond that thanks, you made the mess bigger and added you to the list of idiots making it.  And repeated dialog that denigrates the character of others with things you can not prove with pretense of knowledge of business with others you have no witness of is just that, online bullying and harassment. I suppose you could add that to your rap sheet and exchange LSD recipes in prison again for doing it, nothing new for you I'd guess.  Much luck on that also.

Words in Fahrenheit 451: 46,118

Words so far in this thread: over 48,000

Our next milestone will be Slaughterhouse-Five, which is about 50,000 words. :)

I could have been the worst tenant in the world, I was not, I was too busy getting him to fix my place and we never had the chance, but it would not matter.  None of that changes any of the reality there and makes asbestos, termites, roaches, broken plumbing, and all that go away.   Just those alone are enough to look to live someplace else. Unless you prefer to live outback in the dumpster, but I won't speak to what you will put up with.  In other words as a "Concerned Neighbor" take your complaints and toss them since you made no effort to resolve them, I did and that and nothing else was fixed.  Burden again was not on me to perform and I never heard anything about anyone else with a problem with me.  Don't come to me now and say YOU had a problem with ME.  It never happened. I never heard about it anyway.  Did you write me a letter or serve me court papers?  Or claim anyone else did? Or that I was evicted?  It never happened.  And it won't there for certain.  Now you offer that Wakimoto has legal recourse against me based on your say so and not being party to our agreement?  You keep writing checks you can't cash son.  You might as well offer that Octavio cut my left arm off with his abrasive saw he was not using to dig the hole in the walk to repair the perfectly working sewer drain from the unit upstairs.  Since you obviously are a medical expert too why not offer more cures for the common cold that I caught from you?


 Again you offer vague suggestions about things you could never prove and use the "No Names" defense of that and the suggestion of a problem resident, maybe that was you?  And he was being polite?  But we don't know that either.  You are partly right though, Wakimoto has trouble with me and he made it.  He started it, I am going to finish it.  You got that notion by reading the concerns here correct?  You must have sensed that somehow?  Or did you miss the obvious again?  I won't need to add that this is sarcasm, you are familiar with that?


And then you offer that I can only be the victim of ONE crime in my life and being so would preclude that Wakimot rented me a slum, that he is not a slumlord by that, and that none of the obvious problems with his property are ANYTHING but me?  Right, so that makes no sense either.  


All of your lies are just that, crap and lies. They stink just like Jimmy Wakimoto lies.  And that is going to be the problem with people who create victims, they won't like them.  You seem to fit that category all too well for some reason, why is that?  Oh and by the way, how do you prepare your fish?  The same way you prepare your victims?  By beating them up?  Is your "Fish" tender now?  Good enough to eat?  Or do you want some Adolph's Fish Tenderizer and some of my pity party sauce to wash it down with?  You and poor Jimmy Wakimoto can enjoy that one on me and have some Asbestos, Termite, and Cockroach Mousse for dessert.  It is all free, you are buying. Jimmy need not send boys to do a man's job, you don't serve him well in all you do here.  Better men have tried than you, and you won't stop me from making Wakimoto's life miserable over this.  Count on that.


And again, you are too quick to point out and find fault with me and I have warned you already in advance I am NOT telling you everything for a reason.  And that seems not to matter since you already made a ton of claims you could never prove let alone experts who'd be able to.  For instance I could have a theft claim against him, possibly Jimmy stole from me, or Octavio did, or I was threatened, you can not show up here and pretend to know all the concerns and you don't need to.  I have told YOU what YOU need to know for now NOT TO RENT HERE.  Those as I outlined are enough to send you elsewhere and this and the lack of ethic is enough.  You are too busy attempting to be contrary to ALL that I say here and you in fact can not be contrary to ANY of it, you just don't know that yet.  Most people will write you off for attempting to be contrary to me by the portions you claim and pretend to know about and by what you claim, it is not possible for you to make your claims as such.  They are preposterous in other words and could NOT be known to you.  Again, my bet there is that you attempt this to be a simple inversion of my vanity that you attempt to make, it is misguided and foolish to attempt to do so.  You should have thought about it first and why it might backfire on you.  Too late now.  Too  late for Jimmy.


But I had that also, much of what you do is bigoted, prejudicial and you resort to naive and base accusations and colored remarks designed to be as slurs.   Common gutter tripe is the concept and base stereotypical slams about people and their histories you know nothing about with your dose of self-envisioned medical expertise based on your lifelong list of felonies as a pharmacist and dope pusher.  And you offer it as fact and you have no offer of proof other than written words here that explain why your are wrong and point out defects in your slum, excuse me, apartment.  It is a slum.  Did you take offense to that?  Why? Move out, you have better choices, it is ok for me, so it must be ok for you to have to move, no skin off my back after all.  You love to carry furniture around and waste money right?  Who don't?  What now, complain about all the moving in and moving out and packages that need to get delivered so they can get moved out 2 months later and the rest tossed in the trash?  Guess what?  That won't change any time sooon with this guy so get used to it.  How many people moved in the last three months?  You get the idea and know why your argument is lost, face the facts.


And for Steve who cited other reports, next time you read the newspaper or watch the news or read CNN on the web be sure to discount all of it since the authors complain so much.  You don't even know those reports are mine, how could you?  You don't know a thing about me and you offer you did this how?  By writing style?  Not possible, who by your own admission is a drug user and dope pusher, you admitted that here.  You expect us to take your analysis as anything but being deranged and/or dishonest?  The LSD and Meth won't help you any now you claim to know who writes what anonymous posts here and then claim they are mine and someone else's?  It is not possible. 

Who wrote the other reports?  You claim that is me?  You can't know that and it would not matter, who knows even how you'd arrive at this list of reports you now cite.  You don't even know who typed the other comments in this report on this thread let alone any others beyond your own, again you offer proof where there is none.  You announce defect and diagnosis when there is no need and no proof but then you claim to be able to offer some kind of medical ethic that allows you get right things that many physicians will get wrong, how is that Steve?  More Meth gone to your head?  You live in a drug induced fantasy land that has you harvesting other reports online and tossing them in with mine and using the notion that more than one report by someone means they are all bad.  Again, no logic to that at all.  You offer another dead horse to be beaten to death again, and then want to complain about the dead horse you showed up with and the fact YOU are hitting on it with that broken baseball bat.  You got lost in your first comment and came here to harass me since this is what it now is.  Verbal harassment of someone who made a report and you just can't stand to hear it.   So you showed up to make a mess and to call me names.  That is the end of it.  You do offer just that as that.  Anyone other than you can see it. 

You convened the same lynch mob right here for others to see what you are all about, thanks.

None of you can speak to me at all.  You could only speak to the state of your apartments inside, the outside of the unit in general and your direct experience with Wakimoto.  None of which would or could be used to negate my experience with him.  He could be a perfect landlord and decide to burn one resident or make a mistake there.  It is not impossible that this would or could happen.  Even perfect people make mistakes.  I doubt any of you is perfect and neither is Wakimoto and I never claimed to be. I don't need to be, I am the injured party here and your want to complain about victims this and that, I am one.  You can't deny that either.  It seems you want to put Wakimoto's onus to perform on me, I have none.  And no claim was made of me nor any concern expressed to me.  Wakimoto agreed Octavio was wrong and in his words he said he'd not be back, it was that serious AND Octavio raised his fist to me, a big no no in my book or that of any reasonable person.  You wont bash on my wall and glare at me and raise your fist to me either.  Personally, I think you are the flake and problem here, likely you are a bigot and this is the problem.  You mentioned age, that is part of that, and I think you trip on color and race also.  You also trip on something else.  


Who are you?  Someone who knifed me in the back and wants to be proud of it?  It won't win this argument or any other one for that matter.  They do exist, there is crime in this country, this is part of that complaint, and as such these crimes create victims, again did you move to Iowa and take that place with?  You have a flawed view of the world yourselves it seems.  This would probably indicate you are criminals and can't hear your victims complain.  Just my guess.  By his actions Wakimoto is a criminal, I don't need to know why or offer reasons for him doing so or for him being one.  You can't deny that either, since you can't speak to me and my experiences with him or anyone else, if you had trouble with me, you needed to do something about it, you did not.  You were the problem there, I never needed to pound on fish at 10am, 10pm, or 4am as you slammed your doors and did all you did including playing the same tune over and over again.  Others complained about you to me, so I know.  That and you are too busy getting lost in your rumor mill that you and your fellow church goers like to think you can get it all over on people you never met based on something you heard.  Lets put it this way, your family is doing you a disservice by allowing them to tell you lies about me before I get there perhaps that would make you invent dramas that you do now and did then to prove me right all along.  Next time you piss on my head at 4am I won't do you the favor and I will come to your door personally and make you stop that noise you are making to wake me up.  If you don't I will have someone else come with me and do it.  Good luck in the next place you rent, I already had mine picked out and knew how I was going to fix Mr. Jimmy after about the first week of my being there.  I'll fix you too.  You are next.  Welcome to America!


Most honest people don't beat others up for getting ripped off.  It makes you seem part of that process and sympathetic towards it since all you do is put down and run down those who get harmed by it and do so by your refusal to see any of it.


Oh and "Complainant's Neighbor"?  What a big word that is, sounds like some official Legalese to me, who told you to use that word?  I doubt some hood rat like you came up with that all by himself? Anyway have fun and you are right, I am d**n rude when people are rude to me, I am rude right back.  You get about three strikes then you are out, that is how I work.  It seems you like to start out slapping me in the face and then want to be friends by not apologizing or having me do it for you.  I don't work that way.  We won't be friends now, your loss not mine.  I don't need you and I don't like you and never will.

I'd also point out that you live in a fairly gritty portion of one of the larger cities in the US and you now suggest or offer that you live in "Little House On The Prairie" with John Boy Walton next door, you also need a bit of perspective about what really is there.  See point I made about what is around that place, and what type of people you'd expect to be there.  Your want that we are all supposed to put up with abuse from your host and my former landlord and not be upset about it or offer him a verbal pat on the shoulder makes you seem, let's see, like a fake, flake, fool, and possibly a twit.  Last I checked lots of people told me they don't trust men who don't swear.  I'd be one of them, certainly when they'd claim to be mad.  And I am mad, make no bones about that either, and I am not sorry for being so. That and I never claimed not to be upset, did you?  You need to accept that and understand why and stop making it something it is no.  Or barring that?  Who cares what you think about me and if you don't like me, then good, I am glad for it, what are you going to do about it and how does that save his bacon?  It does not.  And it wont.  You are not that important nor is your text here, it is just a tangent that people will discount if they bother at all.  Nice try with that.  

And with that this is what it is and this is as I said, it was harassment and the landlord partook in it and you are party to it now and then also.  In that you deny or seem not specifically, but you imply that you deny, any of the faults I point out.  Again, items not repaired, defective plumbing and wiring, that is also documented by others, asbestos, termites, roaches, painting that needs to be done, etc.  That much would be obvious but you can not admit that here for some reason, and then your offers of same are retaliation as well. I heard pounding from kitchen side unit at 10pm and later, bashing on walls, pounding on cabinet sides, and for a time it seemed like you were getting a new kitchen over there.  So if I had to live with that noise then you can also.  I don't need to be happy about it since you seem to comment you like to hear it so much and do so right here.  Again, nobody said a thing not ONE thing to me while I was there about any of it and I asked repeatedly to have things fixed.  But again, you deny now that the place is in need of repair and now claim it is "Perfect" or nearly so?  Again, not honest of you.  Much work needs to be done there and you had to hear the sawing in the night, and all the sewer work ongoing.  I won't apologize for having to have work done in my kitchen that you felt you needed to swear at me for nor will I be sorry for your rude behavior I had to listen to at 4am and otherwise.  Mucho Luck With That Amigo!


This is great, I love doing this.  Who is next in the "Lets Help Poor SlumLord Jimmy Wakimoto Show"?  Going to send more gang bangers, drug dealers, MethHeads, and hookers to help you and him out?

I am getting sick of just calling him "OP".

Anyway this all sounds in line with his previous history. When he stays in a hotel, he also goes off about people slamming doors at all hours of the night, people tapping on his walls, etc. 

He has pretty much the same thing to say about every place he has stayed at:

• Coronado Villas, Tucson, AZ ("I had neighbors harassing me by pounding on the walls, throwing boxes at my door, and an older man across the way exposing himself in his window")



• Wildwood Acres Apartments, Niagara Falls, NY ("Their maintenance people hit my car, intentionally, five times in the parking lot with their mower.")



• Silver Lake Apartments, Niagara Falls, NY ("The absolute worst slumlords!")



• Studio 6, Tucson, AZ ("I had a mattress soaked and I mean SOAKED with dried blood, someone must have been murdered on it.")



• Studi 6, Kissimmee, FL ("I was told that my reservations would not be honored because I had complained about a housekeeper who had seen fit to bash upon my wall as I was sitting at the table in my room, also attached to the wall.")



• Apartments Niagara, Niagara Falls, NY ("I had spit in my closets where someone had hacked onto the walls of them and left it to run down the wall onto the shelving, a nice touch that.")

Person who claims to be my mystery neighbor says - "I am the neighbor who lives next door to this guy who submitted this report and this is my side of the story."


Where did you live, kitchen side or living room side?  Kitchen side guy had complaints from day one from others about loud music, being hostile, did not speak to anyone, and was bashing on my kitchen walls even at 4am slamming cabinets, etc.  We never spoke other than him swearing at me one morning at 4am when I told him to be quiet and stop slamming his d**n doors.  If you heard pounding in my kitchen you heard Octavio working over there and he was there a lot, working on the cabinets.  This is part of my complaint, again, here you go, offering more smoke and chaff to that which I already talked about.  You keep asking me to type more by doing this then complain that I respond.  Your report here is either written by someone who has no idea who lives there and where and how these apartments are laid out, or it is completely false.  As of now I have no lease and nobody evicted me since it'd not be possible as I am leaving, again, you have and offer bad information.  Wakimoto won't go to court, not with this slum, he'd lose them all.


Person who claims to be my mystery neighbor says - "A few months ago this guy moves in and for weeks I was constantly hearing pounding on the wall throughout the day. I didn't think anything of it at first because he just moved in so I thought that he was just getting settled in and was probably just hammering something or hanging paintings on the wall or something. Our kitchens are connected by a wall. Well one night I was preparing dinner and I was banging some frozen fish against the counter to get them apart then I hear this double-fisted pounding on the wall for about 10-15 seconds. After it stopped, I started pounding on the wall back and thats when we started going at it shouting at each other through the wall. We exchanged some words and then he starts going off like a maniac. That's when I realized that this guy probably wasn't in the right state of mind and probably wasn't mentally stable so I decided to just let it go, ignore him and go about my business. But thats when I realized that the whole time that I thought this guy was hammering stuff, that he was really pounding on the wall to complain about me making noise. I never made the connection before because I was just doing normal everyday things that you do in a kitchen like opening and closing the cabinets/drawers, washing dishes, using my blender, putting dishes away in the cabinets, etc. We're not talking about loud music here, just normal everyday things that everybody does. So after that incident I was even consciously trying to not make that much moise by gently placing things down or gently closing the cabinets but he was still pounding on the wall. I would wash my dishes and he pounds on the wall. I open and close my fridge and he pounds on the wall. I use my blender and he pounds on the wall. Not only does he pound on the wall but he will purposely open and slam all his kitchen cabinets and drawers like a child having a tantrum(and this guy is probably in his late 50s or 60s).  Anybody who has ever lived where the apartments are connected to each other knows that you are going to experience some noise from the neighbors next door. But this guy expects you to tip-toe around in your own home and not make a peep. The funny thing is that he doesn't think I hear everything that he does in his kitchen. There's also this woman that comes over to his place once in a while and I swear every third word that comes out of that womans mouth is f-ck this, f-ck that, f**kin...f**kin...f**kin. And they both have such big mouths that you can here everything they are talking about through the walls until the late hours at night. But it's ok for him to make noise, it's just not ok for anyone else to make noise. After a while I realized that there was no way of satisfying this guy so I would just ignore the pounding on the wall and not even aknowledge him. And I work from home so I'm home the majority of the time so this goes on all day. I swear there were times when I was just sitting at my desk typing on the computer or just laying on the couch doing nothing and I hear him pounding on the wall. Maybe I was typing too hard, or maybe I accidently dropped a paper clip, or maybe he was pounding on the neighbor's wall on the other side of him because he was breathing too hard or something...I don't know. Steve, I think you may be on to something, maybe he is a delusional schizophrenic and is just hearing things in his head that aren't really happening."


Again after all that the kitchen side unit had others complain about loud music, I don't expect anyone to tiptoe but you had complaints about that unit and noise, I had doors being slammed over there and it was being done at 4am I was told by the person there one evening at 4am "F You" since he did not care that he was slamming his doors shut and it was excessive.  Upstairs neighbor agreed was loud, she was profane, she stayed longer than I liked most of the time, she and Octavio witnessed kitchen side doors slamming, they could hear you over there and I pointed it out to them, so you got caught there also, I felt bad for her and she needed a place to get water and use the bathroom, recall all that?  She was upset with Wakimoto, I agree to all of that, and eventually I stopped letting her over.  But my point to you is that you want to type this now but we never spoke, you just wanted to bash on my kitchen walls and slam your doors and play your music and assuming it really is the person who lived there, you have a problem and that is you made no effort to be quiet as you said AND you spent far too much time tossing things into your cabinets and slamming doors, you were making noise and if you make your "Fish" at 4am, then you have a problem too.  I at this point don't know who you are or care, your concerns never got iterated to me either by your nor via Jimmy so you don't have recourse now nor does he.  Jimmy Wakimoto never fixed my place, he never talked to me about you, you never talked to me, and you still have the same thing, broken crap not getting fixed.  Take your diagnosis and your attitude and your lies and sell them someplace else.  And I suppose my age must make it something it is not?  If I was in my 20's then this would be ok?  Or if I was 90 it would not, or if I was 33 it would be ok?  Do you really know how old I am and how does that matter?  You don't even know my real age and DOB and you can make these claims?  Something as IMPORTANT as my exact AGE and you claim to be able to make such calls?  That IS INSANE my dear man!  You must be nuts!


Person who claims to be my mystery neighbor says - "Anyways, a few days ago, I call Jimmy the landlord to give him notice that I was planning on moving out in a couple months. Then he starts telling me that there have been several complaints from the other tenants about one of the tenants."


It is probably you and I think you can discount anything our "Good Friend" Jimmy will tell you or anyone else, since he will lie to me, he will lie to you about me, and you don't know me at all.


Person who claims to be my mystery neighbor says - "he doesn't give me a name, he just asked me if I had any complaints about any of the tenants and that's when I told him about this guy. "


Did you tell him you play your music loud, don't say hello to anyone, and slam your doors in the kitchen and toss things into them, even at 4am?  I bet you left that out of the "Report" also.


Person who claims to be my mystery neighbor says - "I basically tell him the same story that I wrote above. He then confirms that he has been having a lot of problems with this guy also. He tells me about this report and some of the things this guy wrote. I had to see it for myself so I had Jimmy email me the link to this report. When I checked it out, I couldn't believe what I was reading. Almost everything was a complete exaggeration or just a complete lie."


So tell us in your own words that:  There are no termites there, that there is no asbestos, and no roaches and that my window was not in need of painting and out of service since January 7, 2012, and that he had nothing to repair in my unit?  You can dispute any of the repair items?  I guess then since you and Jimmy are friends this is why you'd harass someone by doing as you did?  I'd also add that you can claim there was no mess made in my apartment from the sanding and dust bomb that went on?  You can't say any of that.


Person who claims to be my mystery neighbor says - "I have lived in this complex almost 6 years(in April). I first moved in in April 2006 into a studio then transfered to a one bedroom 2 years ago. And in those 6 years I have never experienced anything close to what this guy is complaining about."



Then you must be blind as well as deaf and if that you can't hear anyone complain about anything.  If you can't see a broken window and by your own words now, can't see anything in my place, you don't know what or who is in there.  But none of what you say of me is inconsistent with a tenant who is upset at you and your friend the landlord.


Person who claims to be my mystery neighbor says - "I wouldn't have lived here for as long as I did if I experienced those things. And I only read about 2/3 of it because it was so long just going on and on and on and on with lie after lie after lie. Now I can't say that his apartment didn't have those issues because I have never been inside that exact apartment but I can tell you that the 2 apartments that I did live in did not, and the complex only has maybe 16 units. And I've never heard any of the other tenants complain about anything like that. Every apartment complex is going to have its normal wear and tear like this one does but it is nothing close to what this guy is babbling on about. "


I see now I am "Babbling" and we can add that to "Nemesis", "World View", "Ascribe", and "Schizophrenic" as well as "Rambling".  Your want to color my typed text and then make it something you could not know makes us see the pattern of your want to diagnose and find fault with me which, I will point out, is what you have been doing all along.  In that, you were going to use this defense in advance and built that into your responses here as part of that, you had that prejudice and plan to begin with.  The pattern of responders here is THAT obvious.  Of course I've seen it before, and NOW you rely on the "Expert Witness" of who?  Drug dealers and career felons?  Good luck with that.  Maybe you need more LSD and Meth in your systems to make this report? I don't disagree in part but the problem is you, Steve, Robert, Stacey, Kim all of which seem to be on the same bandwagon. I do agree I am sick of typing this and of going over the same ground and that being, you are the problem if you lived over there and that was discussed when I moved in. Others were sick of your music and I was sick of your bashing on the walls if you are who you say you are.  I went through that with Jimmy and Octavio and they witnessed it as did your other neighbors, I think you have a problem there.  No, I know you do.


 But again about you and your "Associate's" comments and "Questions":  Were are all of those honest questions without an effort to retaliate and call me something you could not?  Again your approach is suspect, actually worse, but I will leave it at that.  It lacks candor and credibility and you rant and rave and act like lunatics about someone you don't know who'd rightly be upset about you getting lung cancer and having bugs in your hair.  You missed that though?


Person who claims to be my mystery neighbor says - "Just by reading his complaint you can tell that most of his requests were unreasonable. The few maintenence requests that I had in those 6 years were always taken care of promptly. I don't know what this guy is talking about. Jimmy Wakimoto is actually a very nice guy and I could never picture him doing anything that this guy claims. This guy has probably made dozens of bogus caims about many other businesses. But then again, those things are probably real inside the mind of a delusional schizophrenic."


Right on!  You now say "delusional schizophrenic", where did that come from?  You can prove that?  Keep in mind how RARE that condition is and Steve went for that in comment #1 and got it wrong, you just want to see failure and announce victory.  You won't know that and can not and I could make the same claim of you since you can't see broken windows and termite damage nor read the term asbestos in the lease.  And you can't claim that ANY of my requests to repair were not reasonable since you saw NONE of them and you saw NONE of my apartment.  I guess you can't see my broken unpainted window as you walk past and glare into it in my apartment.  Again, you speak with prejudice and you speak lies.  Did you consult with Dr. Steve "LSD" Wakimoto when you got together to make that "New Diagnosis"? 


Person who claims to be my mystery neighbor says - "I mean the length of his report alone shows some obssesive traits. I was planning on moving anyways before he even moved in here but I was actually tempted to move out last month already because of him. Well it has been brought to my attention that an eviction notice has already been given to him and should be out by march 1. It doesn't matter to me since I'm moving regardless but I'm sure the other tennants will be happy."


How so?  You must be obsessed to bother making a report about a place you are leaving, why bother at all?  You force me to make the same points and dialog over and over and then ask for more by adding more questions to it then claim to find defect in that and then complain about the fact I answered what you asked and addressed what you pointed out and how you are in error.  Are you a doctor?  Surely you can afford better if so?  The fact you play doctor makes you look the fool and flake.  Of course you love termites and roaches and know when my stove is broken, right?  I doubt it. Did you consult with Dr. Steve "LSD" Wakimoto when you got together to make that "New Diagnosis"? 


Person who claims to be my mystery neighbor says - "This guy is one of those people that always plays the victim. The type that is always constantly getting into conflicts with people but is never at fault. The other person is always at fault and he is always the victim. Some people are just so egotistical that they will never aknowledge that they are the problem. If so many people are complaining about you saying the same things then maybe you need to realize that the problem isn't them...it's you!"


Who is complaining about me?  You?  I never heard one complaint about anyone and it would not matter now since it is too late.  This has nothing to do with a landlord who won't fix anything or was your claim now that since I am wanting to play a victim and must be nuts Jimmy was right to rent you and I and anyone else in the future a place with no medicine cabinet, a toilet with a broken flush handle that he refused to fix, lamps missing parts and broken, asbestos, termites, and roaches?  So then since he and you don't like me this is why you did what you did?  I see, that makes perfect sense so it is JUST as I said it was.  You must actually hate me by the way you all but shoved Octavio and I out of the way first day I saw you, and by the way you glared at me and the hostile way you presented yourself around that place, it all fits.   I'd call you the one with the chip on his shoulder but stay, don't leave since you and Waki deserve each other.


Person who claims to be my mystery neighbor says - "Person who claims to be my mystery neighbor says - "So don't listen to anything this guy has to say because he is full of sh-t!"


Oh Oh!  A swear word!  Now now, this is it Mr.!  I think we can just toss you in the looney bin now.  Of course nobody will agree with you who witnessed Wakimoto's place and had to try to live in it, with it, or fix it.  It is you who speaks with fishy forked tongue oh sage "Hoodie One"!  You seem far too prone to offer your diagnosis to someone you don't know and can't see the obvious problems I point out with the roof that is falling on your head.  Good luck. 

Just a comment about what you do, see you are all acting on some speculation you had up front or based on something you heard in the interim and would like to use that to get away with something else.  Most anyone could agree and would honestly point out, even if they were happy there, that some obvious problems exist, such as termites and asbestos and windows needing painting, you were too stingy to begrudge ANYTHING I said to be accurate.  This is going to be the demise of that tactic also, you use a shotgun approach and hope to get it all in one shot, it don't work that way.  By why should I allow you to hone your dishonest practices?  It won't help you anyway so partly that is why I'd do it here also.  Care to keep digging, I have time.  You will never change my mind or make me look any better than you are doing already.........consider it.  Also note that while I was there I was intentionally provocative at some point for a reason, do you know when, where, and why that happened?  Think about that also.

You are back stuck in the same ditch, I'd not pretend to offer medical advice if I was you, you are not qualified or capable of doing so.  Doing it makes you look bad.  You would have been better off making another counter to my claims and used another approach, that one would be my last choice for obvious reasons. It won't matter anyway since the facts and the truth are right there and all up top here, most people won't read this far.  And they will trust me before they trust you and Wakimoto.  I have no profit motive.

I just picked up a couple of things from your report finding fault with me and I note you also arrive at a medical opinion and cite obsessive traits and then offer delusional and cite Schizophrenia, you must be another medical genius but beyond being wholly inaccurate on that, our kitchens don't adjoin.  I will point out again, no medical providers agree with you.  Do you smoke a lot of dope and do LSD just like Dr. Steve?  But you are leaving for the same reasons as me and then want to blame me in reality for getting out of the slum? No matter, your whole report is a lie.

The Hispanic guy who does not speak English shares my kitchen wall, I don't care about your fish story since it is fishy, and I'd say you have it all wrong and are obviously attempting to mislead everyone here and murder my character in the process.  I never said one word to the person who shared my kitchen wall, and this would prove you never saw my place and if you can't locate your kitchen as being on the opposite end of your place relative to mine, then I wonder how you find your home or your own door?

Your whole story is a fraud and a lie.  Patently false.

Oh, another point, you complain about too much dialog here or something?  Use that to claim I am obsessive?  You add insult to injury.  Who's fault is that?  It seems I need to repeat myself because of people just like you and Wakimoto.  This should be clear.

I had to "Obsess" with Jimmy for 6 weeks to replace a medicine cabinet and he did it wrong, I had to obsess with your neighbor for three months to get her plumbing fixed, she had to "Obsess" with Wakimoto for SIX MONTHS and now I HAVE TO OBSESS WITH YOU in about 20 or 30 letters telling you the same d**n thing mostly of which says the same thing, you don't know what you are talking about.  You have  NO IDEA what my state of health is and you all look like armchair quacks who base their medical opinions on what?  The fact you are insane asylum escapees and professional users of illegal narcotics?  Take your conman ethic and diagnosis someplace else, you damage your own credibility here and don't help him much either.  How could you?  Just adding your lies to his make more lies.  And we don't know who you are in reality either, you could just be anyone making that up and not knowing where I lived relative to your kitchen.  You got that wrong and would have to know that, since your kitchen is not where you said it is and I'd know that.  So would the real resident who lived on either side of me.  Sorry, we don't believe you.  You guessed wrong.

And you must live someplace else, since you really are off base.

You may have heard your upstairs neighbor who moved out, she had the plumbing problems and the same other problems with Wakimoto that I had also.  She was loud, she has some health concerns ongoing, and I'd agree she was hard to take and profane and stayed too late more than once, but she was upset and I was trying to be nice to her and see how she was being treated by Jimmy, and this does not make Wakimoto right.  He took advantage of her also, I'd not go to far to protect someone who rips off elderly and disabled people.  By that I fail to see how you'd protect him, you live in a slum and Wakimoto is a crud, he refused to fix anything in my place.  You can't speak to me, or the fact I'd be off base for being upset, or know who is in my place when, don't try to do so or claim you know me at all since you don't.  The ten seconds we spent face to face won't get you there.

You can't deny termites, they are all over outside, you can see their tracks in the wood even there, they are present inside, and roaches AND the asbestos is documented in writing, in CA he must have to do that, I have copies.  That and he never fixed anything and you probably heard me yelling at Octavio, he deserved it, he made a huge mess in my place, come here and claim since I was upset I must be nuts?  You have a serious problem my man, get a grip.  I sure hope when people walk all over you, that you just let them slap you in the face and say thank you so I can show up and call you nuts.  Consider that.  But you are right, I let him have it that day and I am not the least bit sorry for that. You heard it too and THAT WAS THE POINT.  Too bad you don't like it, that also was the idea, you are not supposed to like it and I am not going to sit there and be mistreated and have YOU shove happiness down my throat.  Got that?

Beyond that, I think discussing things you never witnessed and falsely characterize about people who are likely upset anyway is misguided.  She was upset and I was also, I agree she visited me a number of times and she is very loud, but again, she is right, she had trouble with Wakimoto not fixing anything either, I agree she was profane, etc etc etc and not that this matters, we are still both upset with Jimmy for obvious reasons, if you want to put up with all that, fine.  I'd not waste any time attempting to claim Jimmy is an honest landlord and that he fixed anything in my place since he did not.  I had to put up with the guy in the unit in front of me, twice removed from you, BASHING on his kitchen walls, SLAMMING his cabinet doors, playing his music loud, and he did not talk to anyone, and was the most nasty snot I've ever met, you likely heard HIM and not me and I was sick of him also.  Between him, Wakimoto, Octavio's nonsense, and the bugs I had had it, nothing against you but you prefer to find fault with me so you are fair game now.  

It is not my problem (It seems you and he would like to make it mine.) nor is it my job to do Jimmy's and I don't need to study at your charm school when I tell someone who ruined my apartment how pleased I am with them.  That and I never asked you to walk on eggshells either, not that any of this matters since I was leaving anyway and Wakimoto had this problem for me from day one, my want to continue to compel him to fix his mess ran out of steam after the first month.  You were not around enough to know much of anything either.  I had to sit there all day and guard my place, is that window fixed yet?  Be fair.  Did he paint it yet and repair it?  I bet not, how long has that been like that?  Since the first week of January right after we got the shutoff notices since he did not pay his utilities.  Covering for this guy makes you look bad neighbor, you need to keep better company since that is a dead end relation.


But if you care to be that way, then here you go. You never made an effort to talk to me, you'd know I'd be upset by all this, and you showing up now to claim you know me and that Wakimoto is honest? You are full of crap son.  Take it elsewhere since we exchanged about ten words, and that was it.  You can't speak to who is in my place when and what went on between Wakimoto and my unit and if you can't admit that guy next to me was the problem also, then you've missed the entire show.  Again, you are a day late and a dollar short.

I will also say, you never saw my unit and it may not have been as yours, hard to know, and the woman who moved out upstairs, her place was in better shape than mine and mine was not as presented on the internet.  Despite that, she still had concerns such as a complete string of GFIs in the kitchen that did not work.  No working outlets in the kitchen and she was there for 6 months or more!  She had no water and was at MY place using my bathroom, getting water, etc while they tinkered around for a week, blamed HER for the sewer and toilets that did not work, and you want to complain because I had to entertain profanity or you did?  Too bad, again, be fair. You offer BullS**T here son, and this is crap you shuck on us.  That and on Christmas Eve she had to call a plumber to fix it again before Jimmy had to act to repair it and cut the sidewalk apart.  All the time she lived there, 6 months, she had to fight with him on that.  I had the same experience and was not going to let it go on for 6 months.  

Photos there were not representative on the internet either and your unit may have been in better repair than mine, hers was.  I had broken fixtures and damaged cabinets, etc.  Again, you can't speak to my relation with Jimmy and you can't complain about what, the fact someone was in my apartment talking and you've got it all figured out and Wakimoto is thereby not a slumlord?  You must love this guy and he pays you to shill for him?  Since you live there still do you constantly look around for reviews so you can repair his reputation?  For me, when I move into a place, I don't bother sitting around attempting to repair their image by looking to re-rent the apartment I am in.  Why bother?  What is your excuse for defending a slumlord?  If I was you I would pass on the Mesothelioma and get the hell out.  You aren't missing anything and can do better someplace else, why protect this guy and entice others to be ripped off?  I'd say nothing against you but your portrayal of me here is off base and unfair, you don't know how I was treated and you can't speak to what went on in my apartment, who, what, where, or when.  Or do you claim to have bugged the place with hidden cameras and microphones?  Don't bother answering that and don't pretend to be able to speak to ANYTHING about me, or how I was treated there or ANYPLACE else.  Even if you claimed to know any of that or recorded any of it as I suggested I'd just call you a liar and so would anyone else who put up with his crap.  So there.  You don't know me, and it seems you don't know crap from Shinola either.  This would be my guess.  And don't show up here and profess you can claim that upset people have something wrong with them for being upset about being ripped off.  Recall the title of the website we are posting on.  Get a clue boy.  

After all, you live on Long Beach, real men work the docks over there too, better be careful what you call them to their faces too.  If you had a problem with me, I was just next door and you could have learned what was going on, but I think you'd rather be left in the dark so you can pretend to not know and then arrive here to fix things up.  Again, why bother looking to review the apartment you are in?  And you can't speak to my lease, what was in it, what was in my unit, what Jimmy and I agree upon, what people were in my place and when, what was said by who, and none of that you can dispute and NOT ONE thing in your relation with Wakimoto or anyone else can be used to deny ANYTHING that went on between him and I.  One does not preclude the other and yours has nothing and I mean NOTHING to do with mine.  AND coming and claiming you heard something while I've got this lunatic next to me pounding on things and playing the same tune over and over and over again, would be odd.  Again, you never addressed nor denied the existence of ANY of the problems I mentioned conveniently, why is that?  You then claim no termites, my window was never broken, I never had to clean up Octavio's mess, and no Asbestos, etc?  You can't but did you want to claim that and address any of the real concerns other than finding fault with me? Nobody made one claim they had a problem with me and who cares if they would have?  It does not fix any of what I wrote about.  You think just announcing I am the problem is accurate like the other poster did?  How do I cause Asbestos by what, using the Fword?  Or the woman upstairs or her son for that matter?  Does that deny or obviate or remove termites?  Does that remove or explain or provide motive for someone making a mess in my place as they paint YOUR window and is that ok then?  It and what you do now makes me wonder more, so what is your relation with him and why do you show up to protect him of things you can't deny?  He has a ton of maintenance problems there and you have to put up with them.  And you will have to put up with irate neighbors as such.  I had to put up with her, I had to put up with hoodie guy and he was too much, you heard HIM slamming his doors, it would wake me up and I slept over next to your door, it was that loud from the kitchen and mine adjoined his.  Call me a looney?  Thanks for that, what do you call him????  And you then would use that to deny the obvious?  Personally, I smell a rat here since you seem far to want to and far too quick to pronounce defect with me and part of that is your apparently preconceived want to use a mental health defense.  You would have been better off just doing that informally and left it at the "What are you nuts Dude?" line of attack but it seems you really want to exchange injury and illness and arrive at a diagnosis here.  I again will point out you are too late to deny that since it went on up front, and it seems your denial of the real world as it is there and your want to pattern that unto me, makes you look dishonest.  I'd also add that people who are living in places currently who show up to defend them with the claim they wanted to rent them again or otherwise makes you look bad.  I don't care if Jimmy knocked ten a month off your rent for saying nice but dishonest things about his slum, since one kid getting lung cancer because of you is too many.  I think you sold your soul for far too little coin dear neigbbor since I don't believe a word you say nor does anyone else who lives there.  Oh and you can't prove who you are or that you live there either.  Maybe you have the wrong apartment and the wrong report, consider that.  Or?  You live in fantasy land my friend, return there and stay and keep your useless opinions about people and places and things you can't see to yourself since your word and your witness are useless.   Oh and the basis for your claim and "Diagnosis" is?  Bad words?  Please?   Oh you poor boy you!  Poo poo.....did someone use a bad word?  Oh golly and shucks...Yuk yuk yuk..

During the three months I was there he turned three apartments out of what, 14 or less and he is turning mine now again after three months?  Does anyone live in that one with plywood windows? You would be better off in a hotel at that rate since next he will be renting by the night or the hour.  Oh and the repair concerns speak for themselves, at the risk of repeating myself.  Did I say there are repair concerns?  And you saw them maybe yourself "Neighbor" or are you blind?

I am the neighbor who lives next door to this guy who submitted this report and this is my side of the story.

A few months ago this guy moves in and for weeks I was constantly hearing pounding on the wall throughout the day. I didn't think anything of it at first because he just moved in so I thought that he was just getting settled in and was probably just hammering something or hanging paintings on the wall or something. Our kitchens are connected by a wall. Well one night I was preparing dinner and I was banging some frozen fish against the counter to get them apart then I hear this double-fisted pounding on the wall for about 10-15 seconds. After it stopped, I started pounding on the wall back and thats when we started going at it shouting at each other through the wall. We exchanged some words and then he starts going off like a maniac. That's when I realized that this guy probably wasn't in the right state of mind and probably wasn't mentally stable so I decided to just let it go, ignore him and go about my business. But thats when I realized that the whole time that I thought this guy was hammering stuff, that he was really pounding on the wall to complain about me making noise. I never made the connection before because I was just doing normal everyday things that you do in a kitchen like opening and closing the cabinets/drawers, washing dishes, using my blender, putting dishes away in the cabinets, etc. We're not talking about loud music here, just normal everyday things that everybody does. So after that incident I was even consciously trying to not make that much moise by gently placing things down or gently closing the cabinets but he was still pounding on the wall. I would wash my dishes and he pounds on the wall. I open and close my fridge and he pounds on the wall. I use my blender and he pounds on the wall. Not only does he pound on the wall but he will purposely open and slam all his kitchen cabinets and drawers like a child having a tantrum(and this guy is probably in his late 50s or 60s).  Anybody who has ever lived where the apartments are connected to each other knows that you are going to experience some noise from the neighbors next door. But this guy expects you to tip-toe around in your own home and not make a peep. The funny thing is that he doesn't think I hear everything that he does in his kitchen. There's also this woman that comes over to his place once in a while and I swear every third word that comes out of that womans mouth is f-ck this, f-ck that, f**kin...f**kin...f**kin. And they both have such big mouths that you can here everything they are talking about through the walls until the late hours at night. But it's ok for him to make noise, it's just not ok for anyone else to make noise. After a while I realized that there was no way of satisfying this guy so I would just ignore the pounding on the wall and not even aknowledge him. And I work from home so I'm home the majority of the time so this goes on all day. I swear there were times when I was just sitting at my desk typing on the computer or just laying on the couch doing nothing and I hear him pounding on the wall. Maybe I was typing too hard, or maybe I accidently dropped a paper clip, or maybe he was pounding on the neighbor's wall on the other side of him because he was breathing too hard or something...I don't know. Steve, I think you may be on to something, maybe he is a delusional schizophrenic and is just hearing things in his head that aren't really happening.

Anyways, a few days ago, I call Jimmy the landlord to give him notice that I was planning on moving out in a couple months. Then he starts telling me that there have been several complaints from the other tenants about one of the tenants. he doesn't give me a name, he just asked me if I had any complaints about any of the tenants and that's when I told him about this guy. I basically tell him the same story that I wrote above. He then confirms that he has been having a lot of problems with this guy also. He tells me about this report and some of the things this guy wrote. I had to see it for myself so I had Jimmy email me the link to this report. When I checked it out, I couldn't believe what I was reading. Almost everything was a complete exaggeration or just a complete lie. I have lived in this complex almost 6 years(in April). I first moved in in April 2006 into a studio then transfered to a one bedroom 2 years ago. And in those 6 years I have never experienced anything close to what this guy is complaining about. I wouldn't have lived here for as long as I did if I experienced those things. And I only read about 2/3 of it because it was so long just going on and on and on and on with lie after lie after lie. Now I can't say that his apartment didn't have those issues because I have never been inside that exact apartment but I can tell you that the 2 apartments that I did live in did not, and the complex only has maybe 16 units. And I've never heard any of the other tenants complain about anything like that. Every apartment complex is going to have its normal wear and tear like this one does but it is nothing close to what this guy is babbling on about. Just by reading his complaint you can tell that most of his requests were unreasonable. The few maintenence requests that I had in those 6 years were always taken care of promptly. I don't know what this guy is talking about. Jimmy Wakimoto is actually a very nice guy and I could never picture him doing anything that this guy claims. This guy has probably made dozens of bogus caims about many other businesses. But then again, those things are probably real inside the mind of a delusional schizophrenic. I mean the length of his report alone shows some obssesive traits. I was planning on moving anyways before he even moved in here but I was actually tempted to move out last month already because of him. Well it has been brought to my attention that an eviction notice has already been given to him and should be out by march 1. It doesn't matter to me since I'm moving regardless but I'm sure the other tennants will be happy.

This guy is one of those people that always plays the victim. The type that is always constantly getting into conflicts with people but is never at fault. The other person is always at fault and he is always the victim. Some people are just so egotistical that they will never aknowledge that they are the problem. If so many people are complaining about you saying the same things then maybe you need to realize that the problem isn't them...it's you!

So don't listen to anything this guy has to say because he is full of sh-t!

What kind of work did you do, and with what tech? Why not do that now, as you can do it from home if you so choose?

Anyway.....

"It even took about ten pages of written text from me with descriptions, questions, offers to discuss with you etc before you did any more then just snipe 2 or three statements and then finally you had something of more than one dimension to say."

Dude, your posts are so unnecessarily verbose that to respond to each individual sentence would be a huge waste of time. Plus a good portion of what you write does not make any sense. Try to communicate without all the verbiage; your signal to noise ratio is minuscule. 


"Steve, how many felony convictions do you have for your admitted illegal drug use or violent crime?"

For the drug dealing, I am undefeated with 3 indictments and zero convictions. I have never committed a violent crime.


"It is likely you... don't stand against [illegal drugs]  now either"

Of course I don't. I believe people should have the right to do whatever they want to their own bodies.

"Do you know the count of the number of hairs on my head Steve?"

There is no correlation between the number of hairs on your head and what you write. There is, however, a correlation between what you write and your mental state. I mean, how do you think people get diagnosed with mental illness? Do you think it is via a blood test, sort of like testing for high cholesterol? People get diagnosed with it by talking, which is basically what we are doing (albeit via writing). 

"I am disabled as a result of some violent crime."

So you have said repeatedly. But you never mention the nature of your disability. Of course you are under no obligation to, but it is telling that you go on and on about having a disability but do not want to discuss the nature of it.  

"...pretending to speak as to if I was in Tucson and New York and I was asked to leave where, California?  Have you ever been in Texarkana Steve?"

Lol, actually I have - it has got to be the smelliest town I have ever been in. And bizarrely enough, I was there because I was doing a run from... Tucson to upstate New York! I sh1t you not. That is a funny coincidence. 

"[Stacey] said the problem is me and not the business."

Trust me, the two are not mutually exclusive.

"Repeated efforts to ask you to explain your position meet with stonewalled and parroted replies of the same thing over and over and over and over and over like a broken record."

Good thing you're nothing like that.

"Defect will be harder to find in those you never met and claims of defect based on logical and well thought out letters that demonstrate advanced logical constructs and knowledge many or most people won't have does not prove your point. "

I don't think I have ever seen a post by you that is logical and well thought out. Certainly they contain no advanced logical constructs.

Waiting for the next missive...

First of all in no way did I state anywhere that you were schizophrenic, you are confusing me with another poster.



Second of all, you accuse others of assuming things about you, YET you turn around and do the same things to us but that is ok right?



I could not care one whit whether if you still live there or not! Your post would be a valid one whether if you lived there or not. HOWEVER, when you get into oh this person is colluding with other persons against me it does pull down the credibility of what you are posting.



I come to this site to read credible reports of people who have been defrauded so that I may be warned of who or who not to deal with. It is my responsibilty to decide if I want to believe in the posts and rebuttals or not.





I do not appreciate your using your disability as an excuse for anything! You make the rest of us who are disabled look bad. Hmm, but you wouldn't have known that I was disable by ANY of my posts if I had not just told you. Wonder why that would be? Could it be because I do not use my disability as an excuse?



I too, have had bad landlords over the years and have lived in some pretty crappy places. Does my experience equal yours? I doubt it, because no two experiences are ever the same. However, you did not see me coming here and posting that people were out to get me because of my disability or found fault with me somehow.



Your posting would have been much more credible, coherent, and easier to believe if you had simply stated your facts. Stated that you have filed reports and the like with the local authorities and left it at that. Bringing your disability into it, AND bringing some collusion and everyone is out to get me into it, simply wipes out any credibilty in your posting.



I am not here slandering you or saying that you are mentally ill or whatever. So stop assuming as you are telling everyone else to do. I am simply pointing out in a very nice way the reasons people are having a bit of a problem swallowing your story.



If you have had legitimate problems with this landlord, post it out for others to know so that they may avoid him, file complaints with the local authorities, if you don't want to move, then file a lawsuit against him to force him into compliance, also file to have your rent withheld until compliance is met.



You tell me to go watch TV like I am some child. My posts are just as valid IF not MORE valid than yours. People post on here for advice and answers. You may not always like the answers you get. If you want people to respect you, then respect them as well.



I have done nothing to you other than to offer valid advice. Yet YOU tell me to go watch TV?



You become very hostile when people question your story. If you cant handle questions or advice then I would suggest not putting your problems on the internet. Not every poster is going to handle you with kid gloves and say, "oh this poor man, we should feel sorry for him because he is handicapped." Sorry, no dice here. I too have a disability and the last thing I want is pity and the last thing I will do is pity another person because of a handicap. Just because you are disabled does not mean the world owes you anything.



Does my disability equal yours? Can I say we suffer the same consequences due to our disabilities? No, yet a disability is just that a disability. It does not make us any less of a person. It does not mean that

 the world owes us. It just means there is something that we cannot do. It SOUNDS like you are a very bitter person. I can understand that as I felt the same when my disability first reared its ugly head. You will only help yourself when you start accepting it. I should know, been there done that, moved on. You will only help yourself when you realize that your disability is just a PART of who you are and not ALL of what you are. You will also only help yourself when you stop using your disability as an excuse and when you stop allowing your disability to be everything.



You say that we do not know you. However, do you not realize that much of what we are seeing and talking about is from YOUR posts. Much can be learned about a person by what he/she posts or how they post. Much can be learned through simple observation. Obviously, you have learned NOTHING about me and only choose to take offense and get mad because I don't fully agree with you. If you truly read my post you would see that I was a kind person who offered you a bit of advise.



Good luck to you!

Kimberly Says -- "I have to agree with Steve here. Your report does border on the irrational."

Not really, you just don't understand what happened beyond the obvious, the obvious is enough and the conditions at the apartment speak for themselves, you want to get lost in the muck, so be it.  It is all up there to read, accept it or don't.  You even are not sure, and use the term "Border".  You'd not know that since you don't know me.

Kimberly Says -- "I base my opinion on this part of your post:"
Kimberly Says -- "Why bring other slumlords into it? When you post things like this, you are in fact making people think you are just another crazy that complains about everything. Posting things like this gives another person the impression that you think EVERYONE is out to get you. Why would your landloard collude with other landlords is beyond me. Who is this someone else who broke the law and what does it have to do with you or this landlord?"

So what?  You can't see the logic in one small aspect of the whole problem so you find fault with me, who cares what you think?  Too much information to read, then watch TV.

Kimberly Says -- "Your post started out well, it listed the complaints you had and it made it sound like you were a RATIONAL person with RATIONAL complaints. Then you start rambling with a bunch of incoherent crap."


Sorry, I don't agree.  Already discussed that too.  You are back with "Rambling", "Nemesis", "World View", and "Schizophrenia".  We went over all that, wrong again.  You won't turn concise text into drivel.  Your crap is just that, inaccurate crap along with Steve crap which you can add to Wakimoto crap.  Also recall errors made in offering diagnosis as was done, as you said it is there so it was done.  You just compound the error now.

Kimberly Says -- "Steve, is also right in that IF you are so unhappy with your current living situation, why not move out? You could still post your complaints AND not be living there. However, they will still be valid because you HAD lived there."

Right again, and false claims were made here, just like I lived there and it happened and Wakimoto was wrong and Steve was wrong.  It never got fixed.  You would claim since I moved out that the bad things never happened?  That made no sense either, this is why I took exception and noted that up front.  Simple offer just move, implied I should not have posted here and just moved, as in are you nuts?  Actually Schizophrenic was the suggestion, just move and don't write this was what was implied. 

Kimberly Says -- "What I have NOT seen in your post is that you filed a complaint with others. If the living conditions are SOOOO deplorable, why have you not filed with the health department in your area? Why have you not filed a lawsuit to force this landlord to do his job? Why have you not filed to have your rent withheld from the landlord until he fixes the place up to decent standards? "

Again, you keep finding fault with me for that which is not here, you read all you can into all the information you don't have.  I never said I was not filing reports elsewhere, you all were too busy complaining about the number of reports here to begin with.  Now you want me to file more? What do you want?  Why are you ranting at me Kimberly?  I think you need to calm down, don't worry about it, I will do what I need to do and take care of me.  Obviously you are too busy looking like another quack who wants to invent problems that don't exist.  

Again it is simple, Wakimoto and his repair guy made a mess of my place and put on all kinds of drama not to apologize about it, he did it intentionally to rub my nose in something.  I did not appreciate that and it caused me a health concern.  Do you want to breathe paint dust?  I doubt it, this was not the way to do this.  And with all the other concerns, wiring that does not work, fixtures broken, items taking 6 weeks to fix, a window I could not lock for over a month and missing part of the wood to hold it in place, asbestos, I have that in writing from the landlord he is forced to note that, termites, I have witnesses to that, cockroaches, and so on. Plumbing that does not work, what is the problem?  There is nothing to talk about here. You don't know that Wakimoto did not cause me a medical concern and I won't discuss that here, this is another matter, you seem to want to belittle that also, probably not a good idea either.  Beyond the basic facts and flaws about the apartment I am under no obligation to tell you anything about me let alone my medical history, employment history. I can ask the same of anyone who'd do that of me.  As in who are you?  It is not of merit.

Steve, not much more I can do for you.  Thanks for the offer of medical opinion, I'll pass thanks.  Good luck with the flashbacks and the brain damage.  Maybe get a good lawyer and get rid of all those felonies on your rap sheet somehow?  Take care.

I have to agree with Steve here. Your report does border on the irrational.

I base my opinion on this part of your post:

Other activities are designed to be retaliatory and punitive as was done by dirt bombing my unit and then exposing me to theft loss by leaving the window open and not assembled.  This would seem to be done on behalf and possibly at the bequest of other slumlords who attempted to take advantage of me and use the same defense for doing so and the same approaches towards that end.  They may also do this ostensibly on behalf of creditors that they may think I owe money to or simply because I get my money for free now being disabled, and then imply I don't deserve that either.  This all in all is not their place to decide.  And it is not up to them to punish me on behalf of someone else who broke the law and harmed me in just the same way making me want to say, two, or N+1 wrongs don't make a right.

Why bring other slumlords into it? When you post things like this, you are in fact making people think you are just another crazy that complains about everything. Posting things like this gives another person the impression that you think EVERYONE is out to get you. Why would your landloard collude with other landlords is beyond me. Who is this someone else who broke the law and what does it have to do with you or this landlord?

Your post started out well, it listed the complaints you had and it made it sound like you were a RATIONAL person with RATIONAL complaints. Then you start rambling with a bunch of incoherent crap.

Steve, is also right in that IF you are so unhappy with your current living situation, why not move out? You could still post your complaints AND not be living there. However, they will still be valid because you HAD lived there.

What I have NOT seen in your post is that you filed a complaint with others. If the living conditions are SOOOO deplorable, why have you not filed with the health department in your area? Why have you not filed a lawsuit to force this landlord to do his job? Why have you not filed to have your rent withheld from the landlord until he fixes the place up to decent standards?

And I don't think Steve's offer that I was asked to leave anywhere is any more than what it is, which is a grossly inaccurate claim about someone he does not know let alone events he would not have witnessed to begin with. Or now does Steve claim to have been there, and seen that, and he can represent that as fact along with his diagnosis of Schizophrenia which he will no sooner make than his next offer that I have cancer and he's determined that by counting the words in this paragraph that someone has typed.  It could be me, it could be someone else, but whoever it is has cancer now, maybe, but "Just a touch of it" possibly.  Steve, how many felony convictions do you have for your admitted illegal drug use or violent crime?  Meth and LSD, and I am sure you tripped over more than those, are incredibly harmful drugs it likely explains your maniacal rantings here about people and things you have no witness of.  It also explains why you'd just find fault with others you don't know simply because they don't like crooks like you.  You are a criminal and admitted that to us here, those are felonies and to use those drugs you had to own them and it is likely you have or had those going on and you don't stand against it now either, so you are still a felon.  That is kind of like saying, I miss using all those illegal drugs and murdering people but since I am 81 years old now, I had to give it up since I might get caught or killed by one of my victims.  Not this has anything to do with who you are and what gives you the right or the ability to find fault with me.  You lack both of those.  You may have a vested interest in doing what you do, you seem to avoid that question fairly diligently as your want to pretend you never claimed to offer a diagnosis.  This is likely a method of coping you developed that allows you to live in and employ the denial you would need to live life as a career felon and then arrive to offer your expert rebuttal of reviews about apartments you have no direct experience with and have never met the reviewer to the point of being able by that to assess and speak to his state of mental and physical and financial health.  It would be impossible but I will accept you love your LSD, many people like you seem to embrace the notion they are now mental hygeine experts and love to study and experiment with all the latest and greatest "Meds" so they can feel better about raping, murdering, robbing, and living life on the edge.  Even if that means their local pusher has a prescription pad, right on DUDE!  Party On!  And by all that this makes you a character witness for Wakimoto, an expert in who I am personally and what I am about, and you can use your skills shooting Opiates into your own vein to see what is in my head from 3,000 miles away.  You've got a hard sell on that one, even with me, I suggest you start selling me on it since I am not buying it, I bet nobody else with 1/2 brain will either.

Too bad for you Steve, if it were not for the fact you made all those inaccurate and patently false claims about me, and even doing so would make them look like cheap shots, that is what they are, maybe you could have made a difference here.  Towards what end I don't know, but then again you have no knowledge of any of what you speak of related to me or 616 Orange Ave 90802.  It is odd you'd even claim to try and do as you did. How could you pretend to know anything about me? Since I doubt you have ANY friends named Anonymous.  Oops.  You could not have possibly attempted to accuse me of using my real name?  So I've even gone so far as to offer I'd prefer to protect my identity, why would that be?  Possibly to stave off attempts to retaliate?  Hmmm...could be possible, right?  You tell me Steve and please provide an "Accurate World View" when you do, since your perception is far keener than mine and likely any of the mere mortals who read this.  Again, are you God?  Do you know the count of the number of hairs on my head Steve?  You seem to know everything else.  But I make no dishonest claim there and made it up front I prefer to remain as such for maybe some obvious reasons.  It seems the crooks are smarter than the victims in actuality and you likely could see that, so how many folks have you tried to murder Steve?  Any? I am disabled as a result of some violent crime, I prefer to let others know about it and people like Wakimoto, your want to paint a target on my back for those of like mind who did it makes you what?  I think you and Robert and Stacey have a problem at the moment, care to comment on what that might be? Keep in mind, you can't refute any of that here either since you don't know me, keep that in mind.

But again, back to your point, no Steve your diagnosis of Schizophrenia that you ascribed to me is wildly inaccurate and false.  And as I pointed out since you never met me that you could not have made that determination at all, and the fact that you did, and that you acted upon it, allows me to witness you as being a fraud.  Your methods as indicated here point that out.  You still are acting under that belief even though it could not be proven of you and by you, and to you about me even by others, AND you have no witness of the other claims you make, pretending to speak as to if I was in Tucson and New York and I was asked to leave where, California?  Have you ever been in Texarkana Steve?  Was I ever there and asked to leave as you put it also?  Refresh my memory on that one.

You are too quick, too prone, and spend too much effort in an attempt to trap me in being dishonest or claim that in my discussion with you, where I've been candid and forthcoming, and you do that in order to suggest I'd not be honest and you build this pattern to reflect upon me to claim I'd not be honest with the landlord possibly.  Now instead of calling me a liar, I have no problem calling you one Steve since you've proven that to us here, so has Wakimoto by his actions demonstrable to me outside of here and to others, but for some reason you need to invent another strategy to do that, you seem to be of like mind of others who'd want to use that approach and when all is said and done, why not just try and call me a liar?  Why all the obtuse, indirect, end around, and through the back door sniping at getting to the bone of the matter?  You will trap me in no lies here, and I will of you and have already, and you won't trap me in any outside of here either nor will anyone else.  Honest people don't need to worry about that nor do they need long memories, I have all that anyway.  That and you invest in all of this effort to make these complex and inaccurate not to mention impossible for you to know statements about me personally.  This is not about me.  This is about a business and a manager who offers apartments to rent that you don't want to rent from for the reasons I've outlined.  You even go so far now as to claim what you implied and all but stated by proxy all along.  Really, what you now ask, since you want to dodge another bullet, is what you claimed to know to begin with and offer as fact, and it is not, and it is none of your business.  It is more likely you are insane since you seem to claim to be able to do the impossible, ok maybe you are Superman.  Care to comment? It could also be the brain toxins you liked to choke down for fun that cause you to be nuts.  After all they call them dope for a reason.

The hazard in what you do is that you are attempting to cram your opinion that there is something wrong with me down my throat and that of other people's as well.  That is a hazard since I may act on it and that would be inappropriate for certain.  I think for you, doing this type of thing as I mentioned already, would be about like suggesting folks jump off bridges since they are of no use in this world since they are not able to see it, live in it, and witness it, or do anything about it and they don't belong there.  Care to comment on that?  But no you don't you have another purpose here and that is not about the truth.  That much is obvious now since I've given you the chance to explain yourself. Your approach is too rigid, and it lacks breadth, and it is overly concentrated along one single premise at the dismiss of all else.  Beyond the fact that you just did the impossible and you claim it all worked out.   It even took about ten pages of written text from me with descriptions, questions, offers to discuss with you etc before you did any more then just snipe 2 or three statements and then finally you had something of more than one dimension to say.  And at that, all you did is copy and paste some of my questions, cite them and then provide one line responses to them as though you were Friday from Dragnet.  Just the facts, yep, nope, no sir, maybe, probably not, uh huh, doubt it, never.  LSD, Meth, Crank, Nope.  You must be Schizophrenic, here are some other reports I think you wrote, there is the proof.  End of story.

So the next time you rent a slum I can show up and tell you no actually everything is great just as Wakimoto will do, and when I want your opinion about anything I will give it to you.  Your next meal at McDonalds will taste great despite the fact you were served spoiled milk, but I will know better how it went than you.  I am sure you and the rest of the world can see the problem in your offers of proof to us and your "Candid" discussions which really were you beating your opinion into my head as to what is wrong with me and not Wakimoto.  Stacey even said that, this place must be great to rent and she has two problems, she never claimed to have lived there and she never claimed to even know my real name.  She can't know that either, so sure, it is more likely I just went there and spent a lot of money for no reason and all so I can complain about some guy I don't know here.  Ludicrous you are.  She also offered that directly and with no wiggle room as you like to leave for youself and your offers of fact.  She said the problem is me and not the business.  Hmmm. I'd doubt that and her ability to even claim that.  Obviously misleading and inaccurate.  It would be akin to me calling her a car thief and axe murderer since she complained about me with no witness or even knowing me. I'd not do that, but I will call her as being wrong and her intentions as are yours, as being suspect.  You look dishonest for making them and doing what you do.  Again, your offers of proof along with hers and Robert's, no idea how you arrived at finding your other reports, is that I wrote those, and since you now have what, 3 complete reports filed on this site you think are ALL mine, I must be the problem.  Anyone who complains three times in their lifetime must be the source of the world's ills and their game of baseball, or bowling, is over for them.  Hmmm...seems myopic at least, and ignorant.  

Landlord can not speak to ANYTHING about me personally, I can speak DIRECTLY to him and how he does business and to the state of disrepair in his property, he caused me harm with it and he has done so to others also, including elderly women, and he should pay for that and let that be known.  Those facts alone speak to his lack of candor, his lack of credibility, and his lack of ethic and not mine.  Your actions here belie your lack of candor, your malicious intent, keep in mind you are offering a diagnosis and defect that would conveniently be used to call me a liar without you having to do it and that as such I really don't matter, that is where it ends up for you and you do want to go there it seems.  You just don't want to admit that or let it be known.  Repeated efforts to ask you to explain your position meet with stonewalled and parroted replies of the same thing over and over and over and over and over like a broken record.  Maybe chat is not your forte, but at least you could offer more depth to what you are thinking when you make such obviously flawed determinations, maybe that is the problem, you realize you are wrong and this is your last bastion of hope, attempt to keep doing the same wrong thing and hope it works out for you and I look bad for it.  I think the approach and the tactic is overly simplistic, even grossly mentally ill people can tell you when their drinking glass is broken, and likely they could not type this.  They could also locate a bug the size of your thumb crawling on their head, and tell you it don't belong there or in the apartment and they could agree that asbestos is bad for you even when the landlord admits in writing that it is there, and they'd not be able to communicate as I do here.  So I think while the flavor of your attempt to disseminate ignorance is well honed, it lacks utility and credibility on that basis as well, I saved that one for later, you might guess.  Had you hoped I'd employ that sooner or wait until now?  After all as you pointed out, I am arrogant, I can afford to be, you can not.  I've been through a lot and this is just some of it, with that I have the right and you don't and I happen to be right about Wakimoto also, and it has nothing to do with me.  If he did this BECAUSE I am arrogant, then he still has the same and now bigger problem since I've given him and you motive.  Oops.  See my previous comment about painting targets on the backs of victims who prefer to remain Anonymous.  

It would be obvious at this point that the attempt to remove witnesses does go on, this is one approach as you attempt here.  Fairly standard template I'd add.  Landlord can not even prove ANYTHING about me in general or know that anyone who looks like me actually rented from him or would meet him tomorrow, nor could you.  That is too d**n bad for you both.  And yes you can sneak up behind me and steal my wallet and I can run away and hide and make you pay for it, want to doubt that also?  I won't feel badly for it either and I will win.  It will work. So will this.

You offer that I must make arbitrary snipes at properties and apartments who have a web presence and unless I actually rented from them and paid them rent I'd otherwise not know who their real names are, for instance you will not find out Jimmy Wakimoto's name, bank name, and account number without actually renting from him.  They sure are not on his web site.  So do you now suggest I'd just make all this up and he does offer clean and well maintained apartments to rent and I do all this just to make him look bad?  There really is nothing in it for me since this is not a charity, it cost me money and I wanted to live there, now I will not.  Simple enough.  I'd say you offer paranoid delusions as fact and invent that behavior and short of just announcing that you'd need to prove it since I don't think my world view has room in it for the fact that most all people run around putting themselves through this and the business of life and are making all of it up.  This is what you suggest. Or that you offer this certainly for me and that would be a hugely debilitating set of dysfunction that I surely would not display here.  I can use my words here to disprove your claims, you will be hard pressed to reverse that process, recall that A does not always imply B just because B implies A.   Defect will be harder to find in those you never met and claims of defect based on logical and well thought out letters that demonstrate advanced logical constructs and knowledge many or most people won't have does not prove your point.  This is why I have no problem doing what I do, it serves me and not you and it does not serve Wakimoto and for that I am glad.  That and you are sifting, fishing, insinuating, proclaiming, and otherwise inventing anything, something, or one small mistake or attempt to snare me in some clever trap that would allow you to say "AHA!  We've got him now Stacey and Robert!  LOOK!", guess what?  It will be harder than that, and take more than that.

Your hope or want that most all the folks on the street and shopping mall have no idea they are in the shopping mall at all and are in fact someplace else and need to start filing complaints about the bad taco they never had at the Taco Bell they don't know is even at the mall they never went to is a level of boredom and/or dysfunction I sure hope I never reach.

Save your money and don't put you at risk and avoid the hassle and rent from another person, this is my suggestion to you and others.  If you want to talk to me about your mental illness, since you know me so well, give me a call and stop over and we can chat.  But you seem to have made up your mind already and don't need to see me at all to make your diagnosis as you've done.  I don't think it helps your want to protect a slumlord by tossing vague non-accusations and see lurking paranoid defect in those who can't stand his cruddy and crappy places.  You keep running away from your lies and inaccurate statements to attempt to find fault with me.  Doing so is enough to make you look bad along with Wakimoto, your two wrongs do not make me wrong and you both right.  You seem to use the lynch mob approach to win your battles for you, in that the truth is a matter of consensus for you, the truth is the truth and the truth is Wakimoto rents a slum property and won't fix it.  You won't fix it either by tossing mud on my head.  You just proved that again yourself.

Steve's question in the subject line of his broken record rantings asks -- "So how *do* you respond when medical professionals tell you that you need help with your issues?"

What are my issues and who said I needed help?  You are the only one that wants to turn a slumlord into my mental defect.  You won't do it.  You claimed Schizophrenia and offered proof where there is none, and I said nope, you are wrong and can't do as you claimed you could, it is not possible.  It has no bearing on my witness and now yours has been discredited as well.  This is the problem with shooting at people, some of us shoot back and don't miss as you do.  Do you, like Wakimoto, take pleasure in attacking disabled people since you can invent mental defect in their physical disabilities? And by that call them liars in the process for their want to deride needlessly all those innocent and honest and hard working slumlords like Jimmy Wakimoto? 

Steve, you keep changing the subject to make it seem to be about me and that I'd be the problem here and it can't be known and demonstrated by this.  You keep ignoring your faults and false claims and now you want to know what?  What I discuss with my doctors? There was no relevance to this thread before with what you claimed and asked and this sure does not help this discussion either AND it is completely off base and off topic and anyone moderating this site would remove it possibly for that.  What I discuss with my health care providers is my business and mine alone, and is none of yours.  I have no obligation to share that here and it won't help you not to be a quack nor will it help Wakimoto not to be a slumlord.  You have no right to ask that of me or to suggest any of what you have.

"Again, my doctors don't support your diagnosis, you are full of it and not them."

That was the first time you answered my question, assuming you think "my diagnosis" is that you have some sort of mental illness. But alas, then you had to go ruin it with this:

"And now your world view offers that there are no quacks in the world either?"

Oh man, so are you saying that you have been diagnosed with a mental illness by a doctor, but he was a "quack"? Oh well, I'll take what I can get. 

And when I used to drop acid, I was the one selling it. Of course I bought it as well, but by the sheet. Why would someone who is selling to me turn me in to the police? That makes no sense at all.

"You've already ascribed and claimed defect of me citing references to writing style, ramblings, content being too thorough, too much to read, too many reports other than this one"

Not that it really matters I guess, but I never complained about the bit about being thorough or having too many postings; I like reading your stuff. In fact, I've asked you to point me to any of your other complaints. I could do without so much nastiness though.

"I don't need to justify ANYTHING to receive the money I do for anything and if nothing else it should be more than it is."

OK, I'll bite: why do you think you deserve more than you are currently getting?

Anyway, you're in the software biz? I can't imagine many disabilities that would prevent you from making cash programming. I mean, you can obviously type. When was the last time you had a gig? What tech/languages do you like to use? (Surely you can't find those questions offensive/invasive). 

Steve - (USA) says -- "Again, not talking about me here - I am talking about the doctors you actually see, the ones that certify that you qualify for SSI. Do you tell them they are full of it? If so, how do you justify living on the government's dime?"

I AM talking about you, you made your diagnosis already and could not have.  I now say you must be a medical professional and could NEVER disprove that here, and you already acted upon your belief and diagnosis AND you shared your obviously flawed tactic, approach, and assay that COULD NOT have been made at all and by your methods.  That is all that matters now.  You refuse to indicate to me why and of what use your continued questions (What you asked and answered as did I the same question without supporting why about 6 times now?) that I have answered and that you have answered about my personal life are of use here?  Why does it matter to you, you refuse to answer that ONE question even and that alone makes you seem less than candid, your obviously exaggerated and biased and prejudicial as well as derogatory claims of defect are just what they are.  If YOU can not accept a dirty carpet as being possible, your world view that you offer is misguided, likely that is intentional.  Again, my doctors don't support your diagnosis, you are full of it and not them.  You are the problem here at the moment.

You don't know the basis of my disability, it is not as you claimed and I have told you that, and you don't even know what form of benefits or how many or from where I get them.  I am telling you that YOU are full of it Steve since you are.  And now your world view offers that there are no quacks in the world either?  You are a quack Steve and could never disprove that here or to me.  I don't tell my doctors anything and they don't support your claims ether.  I don't need to justify ANYTHING to receive the money I do for anything and if nothing else it should be more than it is. I am owed much more than I did get and that I do get.  That is not up to you, thankfully, and I don't need to apologize to you for that.  As I said, you don't know if I am wheelchair bound, if I am blind, if I am missing a limb, or if I am deaf.  You never asked those questions.

Steve - (USA) says -- "Does it not make you the least bit suspicious that you think people have been trying to torment you in motels and apartments from upstate New York, to Tucson, to California? Do you ever question why you have been asked to leave so many of these places? You would be much happier if you made more of an effort to get along with people."

None of those claims you can support, you don't know who wrote what, where I have been, and that I was asked to leave anywhere.  You have no clue as to who I am let alone who wrote anything here.  I never said anything about NY or Tucson or motels, this is about Jimmy Wakimoto, and your obsession with offering medical opinion to others you can not support, let alone speak to where I have been, who I am, or what reports I write where and when.  You refuse to answer even one simple question as to why you keep chanting and ranting the same one of me that you have already answered and that I have answered.  Now you suggest I was asked to leave someplace?  Who said anything about that?  How did you come by that claim and how could you prove that?  I was not asked to leave anywhere, but you found a need to invent that AND offer it here in support of what?  Schizophrenia?  Wow, you are lost son.  Next you are going to claim to know my shoe size, color of my shirt currently, and even who the last person you sold LSD to was and why they never turned you in to the police.  That is amazing, you know me so well, you've got this all figured out and you even indicated you don't know what disability benefits I get or by what means.  Next I suggest you offer that I have Multiple Sclerosis since it would make me a lunatic just like you who can't tell if the sun is shining or if he is on the moon.

You've already ascribed and claimed defect of me citing references to writing style, ramblings, content being too thorough, too much to read, too many reports other than this one, who's authors you can't associate with being me, nor could you prove that even if you thought it to be so.  Now you can speak to who I do and do not "Get along with", and now you claim to know where I have and have not been, and when and for how long? This is getting better.  Where was I yesterday Steve?  I think your powers of perception are about to surpass your Godlike wisdom, but then again wisdom and knowledge are 2 different things.  I am starting to think you know it all, what about it Steve?  But anyway, your offers of me now "Not getting along" don't fit either, I even got along with all my neighbors in the recent slum, I got along with all kinds of other people there, and I get along with all kinds of other people here, and I've gotten along with all kinds of other people in my 20 plus career as a computer scientist.  So all those folks don't agree with you, but again, you, a person I never met, who can do all this by his "Vision" via home computer, can speak to one d**n thing about me?  Nope, sorry, don't buy it.  That Steve just is not for you to say and that goes along with your diagnosis, right into the trash bin.

Steve - (USA) says -- "And what do you have against LSD? LSD is awesome, though I am way too old to use it now. "

It causes permanent harm and creates morons just like you Dr. Steve who grow up to be medical experts through their hobbyist experiments into the unknown world of mystery pharmacy.  Your credentials speak for themselves.

Again, not talking about me here - I am talking about the doctors you actually see, the ones that certify that you qualify for SSI. Do you tell them they are full of it? If so, how do you justify living on the government's dime? 

Does it not make you the least bit suspicious that you think people have been trying to torment you in motels and apartments from upstate New York, to Tucson, to California? Do you ever question why you have been asked to leave so many of these places? You would be much happier if you made more of an effort to get along with people. 

And what do you have against LSD? LSD is awesome, though I am way too old to use it now. 

I guess this is the problem with Steve/Wakimoto, they would assume that they rent to disabled nutcases who won't know the difference between living in a slum and not living in a slum.  They make the arrogant assumption that Steve and Wakimoto make that I am a fool and a moron.  By all means, attempt to do that and see where it gets you.  The best mistake you will make is underestimating someone you care to take advantage of.  I welcome you to go down that road all you want and see where YOU end up.  Care to offer any more "Honest" discussion and offers of proof of dysfunction and mental health diagnosis?

Steve says -- "Though your refusal to do so basically answers it for us. Nice try with the whole "you have diagnosed me," as I have not. If a medical professional has never diagnosed you with such, then just come out and say so. If one has (and I think we are all pretty sure that is the case), then you can continue to refuse to answer. "

Are you a medical provider Steve, or as you put it a "Medical Professional"?  You clearly offered your expertise along with Robert and Stacey to offer that you have made this "Diagnosis" here and you want to have it both ways.  You want to make the claim and then claim you never did so and rely on the fact you are not able to, that you might not be a doctor, or any other defense mechanism you would employ to form the opinion and act on it then admit you are not able to do that but go ahead and do it anyway.  You already made those points and told others just that.  You now want to UnSay the things you wrote here, they are still there.  You said them.  And the net result is the same despite ANYTHING I would say, since you won't listen and can't hear.  Now you are wiggling out of it and asking the same question so you think and avoiding all of mine and you ask something else in a different way and do so despite doing what you already did.  YOU already made the claim and went so far as to attempt to prove it using other written statements you claim were mine and SUPPORTED your diagnosis.  When it fell apart on the lack of merit, then you ran for another straw to hold onto.  Again, how are you diagnosing that and making your claim, since I'd not assume right off the bat that anyone who has a bad landlord must be nuts and that anytime someone attempts to insult you with a T-Shirt that says "LSD Users Get Shot In The Head - Hold Still For Me" that this would make you Schizophrenic as such.  It seems like a non sequitur that is odd of you to make and your steadfast refusal to explain yourself makes no sense either.  Why hide how you feel and what motivates you to even ask?   That and you went for that, you did not ask if I had slipped and fell while there on the broken glass and concrete did you? You never asked if I had any problems with allergies to the insecticide or asbestos did you?  You never asked if I had dementia or anything else nor would I be under any and I mean ANY obligation to share that with you or anyone else.  But I replied to you and asked why you'd ask or assume that by giving me your diagnostic claim as you did.  Are you a Medical Professional Steve, may I call you Bob Jimmy?


You also offer a fairly simple and scripted approach that allows you in advance to retaliate in advance for situations and constructs that would have been involved between me and other parties you have no witness of. Again, your remote diagnostic is worthless and would be obvious on the facts.  You are there, I am here, and this won't be invertible in order to be applied to you being me.  I was there at the apartment and witnessed the problems, I documented them and discussed them with others, I investigated them more, attempted to assist the landlord in making things right, he had no interest in doing so and then decided they had to stay broke and I was going to pay for them and I had to live with the defect and dysfunction of the place, his doing, not my dysfunction recall?  

He was wrong in all of that.  And he went out of his way to engage in other behaviors and discussions that were misleading, dishonest, and otherwise and as you now point out, I have not shared ALL of that here.  There is no need.  It could also be seen as he'd use that to claim I did not share ALL of my medical history with him and his want to ask about it, he need not know that, it is not his business nor is it yours, that much you can see.  Beyond that he and you will get what I give you, that is up to me and not you.  You already have done yourself enough harm to make you look like you do.  You make a similar pattern of mistakes that all people like you make and most of what your problem is with what you did here, is that you can not prove the claims you made and that is that.  That and they are wrong.  I don't need to prove you said them, hiding behind Steve(1,2,3....N) won't work either as you all cleverly attempted to push backwards onto my vanity, since you stood by the fact you asked me those questions and answered them yourself with the methods you outlined as such already.  You did all of that.  The question still stands Steve, are you God?  Steven Oh Steven Where Art Thou LSD???  Steven Oh Steven Heal Thyself!

This would seem like an effort to punish me for an assumed effort to hide behind a mental health defense to get away with something. But again, you offer that I'd hide behind a mental health defense in the past and now you'd use that as defense for Wakimoto to get away with this today and then you'd support it by doing as you do making claims you could not using approaches that will never work to arrive at them and barring that, you just take them and run anyway.  That would be retaliation and vigilantism, crimes at that.

You also assume up front that you know me and make guesses about me since later on I will allow you to trap yourself in the extended dialog that allows me then to make the claims I make.  In other words you try to invert the whole process and apply it backwards in some effort to be clever and seem wise and to somehow retaliate against me for something you'd never prove of me here or in any other relationship.  It is done in just that way it seems.  Your claims can be dis-proven easily by their lack of merit and your lack of expertise not to mention you not knowing me at all.  Mine can not be dis-proven since I witnessed them with others and you can still witness them today and others have done so in the past, they are consistent.  They are what they are.  Your offers to remove that by your methods are akin to Wakimoto's dishonest efforts to run the place to begin with.  Your 2+N frauds don't make this right.  Adding ten more won't either.

You see, people who cause others harm, and break the law, need to be careful as to what harm they are looking for and how close they look and how they go about asking those questions.  Even really clever people since not all victims of crime are fools.

Steve I'll accept your continued bad faith and unwillingness to answer my questions to mean that you just wanted to see if you could retaliate on behalf of Jimmy Wakimoto and to discredit me using your mental health defense diagnosed from your home computer which of course is impossible.  You did arrive at that conclusion already and expressed that opinion here.  Once I called you on it and pointed out I am not as you diagnosed and could not be and that you'd not know that, now you seem to offer that you never did.  Odd and dishonest but I've given you the chance to respond and to hear what I had to say.  I'll leave it at that, thanks again.

The original complaint stands as is, Wakimoto is a dishonest slumlord who allows deplorable conditions to persist in his housing unit at 616 Orange Avenue Long Beach CA 90802 and that is complete with roaches, termites, defective infrastructure and asbestos that he is unwilling to fix.  Even watching his video presentation of the walk up for the upper unit is deceptive since it attempts to hide the fact the units are not painted, the exterior is in bad condition and security gates have been removed and discarded leaving spindly bits of wood supporting the roof above. All in all I'd say dishonesty is the norm for Wakimoto and how he allows his property to decay and with that he expects you to put up with it.

You never answered my questions and you already made your diagnosis inaccurately AND you acted upon it.  I answered your question more than once, you just don't like the answer you received and now you are tweaking your position, attempting to modify history, and avoid the subject that you were wrong.  Admit you were wrong and concede I've already answered your question.  Then concede that you even asking it, it is not your place to do so, is enough.  You made all those mistakes and then kept going down the same broken path and still won't concede you were wrong.  Why is that?  And of what relevance is my answer?  What if I was, as I already asked, diagnosed with any illness, how would that help, hurt, or otherwise defend Wakimoto's position in being a slumlord?  Did and does Wakimoto attempt to use a "Mental Health" defense to discredit his victims?  Why do you arrive to assist him in that?  Why can't you answer a simple question as to what is your interest in knowing my medical state?  You seem to have no interest if I am blind for instance?  You never asked that? You seem only to want to know that your belief that I am schizophrenic as you have claimed, yes you did say that, now you claim you did not, is right?  And now you attempt to claim something different by modifying the question to be more vague which indicates you must have dropped your initial claim of the up front diagnosis.  You can see that also? See this is a discussion, and part of that is an exchange of ideas where I can know you and you can know me.  So I need you to concede you were wrong in your accusation, excuse me, "Diagnosis" and ask you now as to how you arrived at it and of what merit is it.  If you want to ask me questions then I get to ask them of you, if you don't answer them then this makes you look less than candid.  Which is where we are at.  So I addressed your initial question and you never responded to mine as to how it relates. I had others that I asked as well, go back and read them.  

Steve says -- "Though your refusal to do so basically answers it for us. Nice try with the whole "you have diagnosed me," as I have not. If a medical professional has never diagnosed you with such, then just come out and say so. If one has (and I think we are all pretty sure that is the case), then you can continue to refuse to answer. "

No it does not, I am attempting to find out things about you and how you went about your claims and what you believe in.  You have and continue to make a number of false statements, made some erroneous decisions, and arrived at some incorrect conclusions based on a number of failed concepts and offers of diagnostic proof via ethereal assessment of someone you have never seen or met.  You did this.  You and Robert said just that.  You even cited OTHER REPORTS I wrote as proof of MY defect.  And then Stacey arrived to toss out a complete paragraph and announced that since she is the boss, she is right, you are right, and Robert is right.  She could also arrive and announce that I owe each of you $81.00, but I do not. Would you support that claim also just because she said it? Please answer ALL of these questions since it makes an excellent conversation and the next one is, do you feel that since I have nothing better to do or that I am schizophrenic, I just travel around renting apartments, purchasing lemon trucks at $40,000.00 a pop, buying furniture, computers, setting up utilities, running and getting pots and pans, sitting in hotels all over the country, ordering things from Ebay, all so I can not do any of those and just PRETEND they are all crooks AND invent completely false stories about people I never met, don't know, and never did business with just as you attempt to do here with me?  In other words you think I just like to look these places up in the phone book or Google maps, and then just slander and libel them online out of what?  My want to just do, I don't know what?  Why?  That makes no sense, and neither do you.  This is the problem.  When you read an apartment review here do you think the other posters are all mentally ill since they rent from  crooks?  When you read a map, do you question if the cartographer had the flu?  But then again you wanted to turn stigma into shame, was that the idea, I am supposed to feel shame for something?  This is what you said, not me, you went back to shame, I did not.  You wanted to seem generous in offering it is ok to be schizophrenic and it is ok.  Well if you want to be go ahead, does that help you?  I am not and I told you why already and why you could not know anyway and neither could anyone else.  You won't know and never will.  Problem is and I am holding you to it longer and harder than you want to hold me to your error, is that you were wrong.  You want to attempt to discredit me with it, deny that if you can and tell my why you made that claim and how it helps anyone, me, you, or Wakimoto, or how it is of use to know?  I will keep rubbing your nose in it for as long as it takes, count on that.  You were wrong, admit it. The words are cited again up there.  

Again you invent more proof of something based on my response as typed and you can no sooner diagnose me as you already have claimed, make no bones about it Steve, I am here to find fault with you, this IS what this about, since you in my estimation are no better than an armchair quack.  I have the history now with you to back that up and it is the same mistake that Wakimoto made and you pointed that out up front.  You can not learn from his history even though you admitted you knew of it up front.  You made the same mistake here and now and still are stuck in the ditch and you want me to tow you out of it and pay you for it. I won't, you will sit and spin your wheels even if that means coating the interstate overpass above you with two long and strong rooster-tails of mud.  Let the mud fly Steve, you wear it well.  Getting the picture now?

Read what I wrote, I answered your question directly it is there, YOU HAVE TO READ IT!  If you can't bother then I will waste YOUR TIME and allow you to trip on it FOREVER!  I mean why not, you have already proclaimed you know this and you can not, that is enough for me.  You can not assume anything about me based on my input to you since I made no claim to divine YOUR medical history other than you admitting you are a drug user of some very harmful drugs.  It would be obvious.  I will keep allowing you to stick your neck out so someone else can chop it off.  The important points are, why make the claim as you did, you could not AND you did, and why does it matter to you at all?  You never admitted you were wrong and I pointed out the hazard in what you did and do.  You are not capable of using any health information I provide you since you can not seem to read, you are prone to jump to completely inaccurate and baseless conclusions based on assumptions that you like to treat as medical fact, certainty, or proven by my manner of speaking in written form here.  It is ludicrous.  I even cite your text that is up there for ALL to see, but you can't agree now that you wrote it?  You never said that? This was another Steve?  Are you Steve(3) now asking me a different question not reading the answer I already provided for the grossly, and I mean GROSSLY wrong and derelict diagnosis offered by Steve(1)? When does your shell game, man in the middle, and all other manners of evasive, avoidant, inaccurate, and otherwise deceptive dialog and practices end?  Now what will you claim now that you have been caught in a lie, and the dissemination of more falsehood you parade as fact and send more shills to validate for you?  You even admit you must harangue other people here who I don't know like Smoothie Guy, Rita, and who else?  Ronald McDonald?

This is all about you, people like you, people like Wakimoto, and others who allow you and him to take advantage of others and then look for clever ways to get away with it.  Burn enough people, and word gets out, I think you offer much dishonesty and inappropriate offers of truth that is not, to what is and should be a fairly vanilla report about a mundane and COMPLETELY routine set of crappy apartment facts.  You said as much already and then started finding fault with me since I was there at all.  But then again you would want to imply that I was not living there at all?  So which way do you want it now? I was there, so I have to leave, or I was not there so maybe I made all that up and need to go visit now?  You must get tired confusing yourself in this way, it must be exhausting. And then you tossed in the medical miracle you offered with that Hail Mary diagnosis and offers of proof of same.  It's a done deal Steve, you said it, you did it, you can't take it back, you were wrong, own it.  Let me ask you this Steve, can you tell what colors my eyes are and if I have cavity that needs filling from there?  Maybe you can use more tin foil hats and build a pyramid to improve your cosmic abilities to read minds as well as perform your MRI from where you sit?

Though your refusal to do so basically answers it for us. Nice try with the whole "you have diagnosed me," as I have not. If a medical professional has never diagnosed you with such, then just come out and say so. If one has (and I think we are all pretty sure that is the case), then you can continue to refuse to answer.  

Ouch, we've got a live one on the hook here folks!  Steve looks stuck in the rut he has driven himself into....

He goes on to say - "Here are the questions you just referred to:"

Most of which I wrote sarcastically, you've heard of that construct? But anyway, here we go....

You mentioned to us about your LSD use and that must somehow reflect poorly on MY judgment in the here and now SOMEHOW since it seemed you meant to imply by it just that.  But you go on Steve as this:

Q: Do you still use LSD?

A: No. Last time was about 20 years ago.

My response to that, who cares what you think about anything as well as your want to denigrate my character using mental health claims that you have contrived in ANYTHING here and your want to offer that in protection of some slumlord? What would be your vested interest in doing that, or otherwise?  I think at this point I'd be MORE concerned about YOUR mental state, ability to reason, and YOUR judgment given this and the rest of it since from where I sit, you can't do what you are attempting to do.  Reread the part where I said, and I will quote ME again, you seem to forget about quoting YOU where I point out YOU have been wrong in this.  I said "I do hope nobody listens to you and decides to take their lives or start acting on your claims in any way up to and including popping pills to fix it.", so there you go.  You by your own admission have used some very serious and harmful drugs that are guaranteed to cause permanent harm to you and YOU have come to me and offered your medical diagnosis with your claim that this impairs my ability to know if I am renting a slum or not.  By that you offer that I can not tell that a carpet is dirty or not, doing so makes you feel I have made a GROSS exaggeration, you offer I have no way to know, rewire, inspect, test, or replace a faulty GFI, panel breaker, use a DMM to do that, inspect, replace, or wire a generator transfer switch, solar array panel, inverter, toilet float valve, hot water tank, anode assembly of a hot water tank, dishwasher, or know the difference between two phase household power, three phase power for industrial applications, the voltages present in those services, how to rate amperage of service feeds and the specification of home and high horsepower circuit breakers and interrupters, compute the loads and capacities of things such as AC units, know the difference between an inductive and resistive load and why that matters, know if a stove is working or not, how to fix it if it does not, know enough to check pilot lights on gas appliances, know if a termite is present in a home by seeing it fall off the wall or leave droppings by the 100's in outlets, on window sills, or walls, and leave evidence of damage by the same.  You imply I have no way to know a cockroach when I see one, a broken sidewalk and defective sewer pipe when I trip over it, to know that a place has asbestos in it AND despite your want to damage your brain using God knows what, to not want a diet of asbestos in my daily routine.  Do I need to go on to tell you that all this and more I can plainly and more easily figure out than you can?  I've left out all kinds of things including my ability to rebuild the engine in your car, ANY car, and have done so countless times, reprogram the embedded systems in your car, diagnose problems with it, repair, replace, design, build, and test things like your home computer, my home computer which is likely faster, more powerful, and architected specifically to be all that and more and certainly nothing you'd be doing any time soon, and that would include architecting systems, hardware and software that would require advanced concepts, education, and YEARS of experience YOU don't have to make all that work, and with all of that, you now claim some kind of expertise in something, likely none of what I mentioned here about me, and you still fell into a simple trap.

Q: Did you do any meth or crack or shoot any heroin?

Did meth a bit in college (also 20 years ago). Did not do crack, but freebased a couple of times, which is very similar. Never did heroin.

Now Steve tells us that he has caused himself brain damage.  Meth is a virulent toxin and is not brain friendly and it is a death sentence for your grey matter.  Keep in mind I am not insensitive to YOUR personal plight I just think you have a problem that causes you to stonewall and keep returning to the same useless point, your want to accuse me by diagnosis of something and your hope that you keep asking the same question over and over and over again in the way you do despite all that I have done to answer it, you keep coming back to the same thing being what you want to hear being what you went ahead and assumed and implied and did on your own.  Why try so hard to discredit me with that and you can no sooner do it to me than anyone else who writes anything here, you, Robert, and Stacey included.  Both of which, you included, are too careful not to say too much, lest you look like fools and dope heads.  You complain that I take this too seriously and you mention that below, I offer you do, since you would SEEM to have no interest in it.  Why would you again?  Why do you bother?  People who I don't know who spend too much time making personal attacks against me that they can't know or prove if nothing else, stick out as the sore thumb you have offered in the past.  Your behavior really is odd.  You spend too much time doing this and are too possessed or maybe obsessed is a better term with doing it. Why?  It does not matter and you can't know what I have been diagnosed with.  It will not mean anything, it serves no purpose to know, you can't know it nor can anyone else here, this is going to be part of life.  You will encounter all kinds of people in your life and they may cheat you, lie to you, have a mental problem, and you will not know it.  For instance you may marry someone, she may actually be a prostitute, you might not know that, she also might be a black widow, they do exist, or you may find out that your friend cheated you, none of this ever happened to you?  With that, I think you have to accept that you made some inaccurate statements about me already that your delusions of grandeur and overly inflated view of self and your abilities to know other people and their health conditions without seeing them has allowed you to make.  Again, why?  Why bother taking that risk as you do and did, to attempt to use that defense and do so at the dispense of all else here, I make responses to your questions, pages of them, and you complain about word count, and miss most of the point and then run screaming back, see I can use your approaches by adding extra exaggerated color to YOUR actions in print, like, wade, nemesis, rambling, so now you are SCREAMING and RUNNING back to this MENTAL HEALTH CLAIM!!  The man MUST be nuts!!!!  Right Dr. Steve?

Q: How about Drano?

A: No.

I was being sarcastic, you knew that, but this is good to know I am glad Steve you've not done that, but are you sure?  Maybe you switched from Crystal Meth one night, to Crystal Math, and then decided to try Drano and never knew it?  Anyway, I hope you've been on or off the LSD wagon now for a while, since flashbacks happen now and then, that is a life sentence also, using it gives you the gift that keeps on giving.  With all of that, I do hope you've found a way to live without using illegal or needless prescription or OTC medications, and your offer of quackery for me and possibly the notion I need Methadone, Anabuse, Cocaine, LSD, Heroin, Thorazine, Depakote, Seroquil, Zoloft, Lithium, Prozac, Wellbutrin, Penicillin, Insulin, Aspirin, Quaaludes, Valium, Benadryl, or Vicks 44D.

Q: Ever take a needle and shoot that into your eyeball or under your toenail?

A: No.

I was also being sarcastic and that is good to hear, are you sure?  Maybe on one of your LSD trips, are you having one now as you write this?  You might have done this to see what is actually in your eyeball?

Steve goes on to say -- "Did you see how easy that was? Notice how I did not respond with, "You don't know me! Please, tell me how you think you know I use Drano!" I just answered the questions. "

Yes, but then again all you have done so far is to complain about all the things I type as being "Rambling" about my "Nemesis" and your want to have to "Wade" through them all. See all this colorful and descriptive embellishing you add to what I write to characterize it as being dysfunctional helps use all to arrive at your apriori want to find fault with my mental state and/or offer something you could never prove of me in a court of law, with any medical testimony or diagnostic, and you sure can't do any of it from where you sit as you claim you can do.  And even IF you could, it would not have any bearing on anything I've written here or anyplace else.  But yes, you are right, this is easy, likely more easy for me than for you, I type for a living recall that?  I am a computer engineer and write more lines of software in a day than you type in letter form to loved ones or anyone else likely in a year.  I can type and think and talk like this all day long and this does not cost me one single penny.  This is one of the languages I speak, and I speak many of them.  As you want to complain about it seems, I can provide you plenty of information in a short period of time and I can provide reasons for why things are the way they are and how they should be fixed.  Among other things.  Your point was what again?  I talk too much, I type too much, this is a waste of time for me?  For you?

Steve goes on to say -- "Now, let's see if you can do it, shall we?"

We already did all this, recall that I helped get you going on actually reading what I wrote and answering questions, I'll point that part of the thread out to you up top if you like?  You then ask again what you have already answered and what I have answered already.

Q: Have you ever been diagnosed with a mental illness?

A: [you fill this part in] - Yes, you did Steve, you decided I am mentally ill and you have already acted upon your diagnosis.  It does not matter now, this is akin to slapping someone in the face, or hitting him in the head, harm is already done.  Who got hurt now is the question?

You go on to say and I like the additional color you add - "BTW, I love this little gem: "Wakimoto is a small fish in my world and not worth worry or bother." Yeah, that is pretty obvious from your posts. "

Why would it not?  I mean what is wrong with you wasting my time with your foolish notions and claims to divine ANYTHING at all about me, my character, or my state of health, you can't possibly do it.  As I said, Wakimoto is not worth my time, now I am working on YOU.  I've got him taken care of already and this is just one forum I will use to put him out of business.  And I will do that.  So go on, how does this make it anything it is not?  I fry fish like him all day long.   This one is easy and I can chat with you or anyone else all day long every day for a long long long time, this is no sweat off my brow at all.  You can tell that right?  Simply by the dialog, how quickly you get it, and of course the thorough word count you aptly point out.  I suppose you prefer the short and sweet approach that Stacey would use and here, let's try that, I will pretend to be Stacey talking about you now:

-------------Begin Stacey Post

Robert is right Bob, may I call you Steve?

AUTHOR: Stacey - Dallas (U.S.A.) SUBMITTED: Tuesday, February 33, 1981

You have filed mutiple reports about the same thing under the anonymous post from Steve, Texas.  Your short inaccurate reports are hard to miss.  Sounds like you are the problem and need to take some form of pill.

-------------End Stacey Post

So what do you think?  Who wrote that and what does that have to do with you?  Note there is a red herring in there for you, can you find it and a clue as to the "Real Author" is???

Here is what you said when you diagnosed me with a serious, chronic, and debilitating mental disorder and next you will offer that I brought it upon myself, I am shocked you never went there with that yet?  Why?  You needed to get phase one in place before you took it to the next level to blame me for it?  Anyway, here you go Steve:

Steve says -- "And no need to get pissy because I asked if you have been diagnosed with schizophrenia. Either you have or you haven't. The reason why I suspect you do have at least a touch of it is the paranoia in some of your statements, where you imply that the landlord is out to intentionally do you harm. But I never claimed you had it, I just asked if any medical professional had made that diagnosis. Yes or no answer."

You specifically cite instances of paranoid behavior that you did NOT witness AND that led you to the wholly inaccurate "Diagnosis" of schizophrenia.  One does not imply the other, they may or may not be related, and you can't even pretend to know the part about paranoid.  That implies an unreasonable fear or set of expectations and you will never, and I mean NEVER arrive at that any time in my lifetime.  Sure as hell you won't do it from over there.  Or, does your LSD make you think I am in the room with you now and then as I typed this and the other messages you don't know who typed?

Steve goes on to say -- "And while I have a hard time believing the place is as bad as you describe (your descriptions are a bit over the top), let's say it is. I am not "blaming the victim," as you put it. I am suggesting that you stop being a victim, and get out. I've lived in some crappy places in my day, but I saved up a few bucks, and got out. "

So, again, once a set of circumstances passes your threshold of being hard to believe, you and those doing it can rely on your defense of audacity and normalcy bias to get away with it?  Recall I pointed those out already? That being since there are four and not three broken things, those doing the report and complaint must be nuts?  That would imply that if I was Jimmy Wakimoto and you were the building inspector, if I was Jimmy I would not fix anything that was not on fire since only having termites, asbestos, sewage leaking and broken windows would get me closed down, but adding defective GFIs, adding dirty carpets, and not working toilets would then cause YOU to think you are insane and walk off wondering about more LSD?  By your logic and approach, this does cut both ways recall, I warned you about what you believe in being used against you?  If this is how your reasoning goes, then this is what you offer in defense of Jimmy and at my expense it would seem.  Since it is too much to fix, would it not seem part of the reason he does not fix it is that he can't fix it himself?  And this is why it takes forever?  And he wants to complain about it and not pay for it?  Likely. Instead of blaming him for the 10 broken things, you blame me for: 1) Putting up with them, recall that was your opening shot at me along with your medical miracle. 2) Complaining about them and offering it is being done intentionally.  Refusing to allow others to fix them basically gratis means you want your crap broken, this is the obvious outrage and mind numbing stupidity of WHAT WAKIMOTO does.  People have all kinds of funny ideas in this world, you and he are just two of them.

My turn again, to Steve:

Q: I would ask you to characterize and explain what "Over the top" means and why you feel that way, specifically WHAT in all that I wrote is the problem.  Keep in mind landlord is doing this intentionally, there was no reason to do what he did and he won't even allow me to repair the items without enacting punitive measures.  So tell me what was "Over the top"?

A: [Steve fills this in]


Q: What diagnostic did you use to determine that I have schizophrenia?  Do you realize that your offer of being "Partially" schizophrenic is inaccurate, you say "Touch of it" see up top a few lines and this would not be possible either.  How did you arrive at this determination?  I could just as easily assume Jimmy Wakimoto has ADHD, Delusional Disorder, Megalomania, and possibly he is a Sociopath.  He could also be part of a Samurai cult and possibly have an ethnic bias that allows him to disrespect white men who are not Jewish?  It is possible, I've not mentioned that, but by your approach this could be possible, right?

A: [Steve provides discussions about his credentials and ability to diagnose health concerns by Ebay]


See that was easy! No blood, no scars, no knife in my back, it is all good.  Please go on Steve and answer more of my questions, you missed quite a few along the way.  Time to catch up.  I have time.

Here are the questions you just referred to:

Q: Do you still use LSD?
A: No. Last time was about 20 years ago.

Q: Did you do any meth or crack or shoot any heroin? 
Did meth a bit in college (also 20 years ago). Did not do crack, but freebased a couple of times, which is very similar. Never did heroin.

Q: How about Drano?
A: No.

Q: Ever take a needle and shoot that into your eyeball or under your toenail?
A: No.

Did you see how easy that was? Notice how I did not respond with, "You don't know me! Please, tell me how you think you know I use Drano!" I just answered the questions. 

Now, let's see if you can do it, shall we?

Q: Have you ever been diagnosed with a mental illness?
A: [you fill this part in]

BTW, I love this little gem: "Wakimoto is a small fish in my world and not worth worry or bother." Yeah, that is pretty obvious from your posts. 

Again you lay out in advance your hope to accuse me of your warts and all three of you do basically the same thing.  You offer exaggerated claims that hope to speak to the fact that I would be blustering or that something I offer in something you've already said is a mundane concept, slumlord and crappy apartments, would be impossible to accept.  Your up front defense of that and hope to trap me in a dead end dialog that would require me to be dishonest with you first and then base your retaliation upon that following the initial claims of mental health, strange, and other loaded implications in the first comment in the thread.  It is suggested that a soiled carpet makes me exaggerating, really?  Be honest with us, you are making every effort to claim I just made all this up for some reason and then offer your medical expertise to do that.  This is what you are attempting to do, not very well, but you are going there.  Stacey is there, Robert is helping, and Steve set it all up at Number One.

So nothing really is out of the norm in what I say here, but now you want to paint my words with colorful dialog and subjective flavoring of the nature and your additions to what I say of the like with claims of "Rambling", "As I WADE through all your posts", my "Nemesis" not to mention my "World View" and don't forget the "Malice" that I "Ascribe" to ALL people now.  Going on we have other things such as "Ulterior motives when there are none", how the hell can you know that?  What do you know about me or anyone who's ripped me off, and they said up front they are going to steal from me and lie to me?  What in that makes doing what they did, whatever that is according to you, not having an "Ulterior Motive"?  Maybe now you can assign more stigma and blame to me and hope that 2 people stole from me and use the..... Oooooooohhhh.... scary kids............ CONSPIRACY CARD!!!!!!!   Ouch, the dreaded "Silver Bullet" of insanity claims and the Holy Grail of dumb-a** felony defenses for stupid jerks who want to rip someone off and are not man enough to go it alone.  So there you are, you can also add more flavor to my words and convict ALL OF US, me included with YOUR ignorance and foolish belief system that the world is full of and I mean CHOCK full of honest hard working folks who will never and I MEAN NEVER rip you off.  It surely is ME who is the problem here since nobody else in this world is dishonest and I was the one who invented Jimmy Wakimoto and this whole story about a slumlord.  

You go on to say I said you'd want to live there, I did not, your defense is you offered a question that I did not answer and your sandbox game of Risk has been won!  I thought you were being funny or sarcastic and it was meant as a "What are you nuts?" kind of thing and you went down that road anyway, and then went so far as to offer diagnosis when I preferred to brush it off and get to the meat of the matter.  You however wanted really to forget all of this complainin' crap and see if maybe you can push some dope on me? Eventually other than finding fault with what name I called Steve and/or Robert, not that it matters since I don't know you and you don't know me, it seems you read some of what I write but you prefer simple yes or no answers to describe concepts that are actually complex, you might learn something if you stopped popping pills into my face to shut me up.  It would go something like this:  You - "What happened at 616 Orange?" Me - "No"  You - "Where there any concerns that we should know about" Me - "Yes" You - "Can you describe them for us?" Me - "Termites" and so on.  But again, you are too busy offering a computer program to claim to know who is writing what posts, use the fact there is more than one, and the fact you find something wrong with what? The use of terms?  The amount of words?  The fact you need a dictionary to read them?  I can't help this, this is my vernacular and I use words to express emotion and I use words to express concepts as concisely and accurately as I can.  You want to show up and then accuse me of seeing danger in every corner, offer that I just talk total lunacy, offer that I elevate, promote, distort, or otherwise warp as you said all the concepts here.  How?  You are FAR too diligent and tasked with making something out of nothing and by that you want to offer a dimension to the written words I type here that you can not prove, that you can not know, and that are not expressed here.  Your constant return to finding fault with me, making inaccurate claims about me based on syntax, grammar, spelling maybe, or choice of words is a lost endeavor, you'll never prove any of what you present beyond the fact it is dead wrong since it is not possible.  Things that are not possible to do, are just that, are you all Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman???  The data is factually correct as is the analysis of what was implied by the other dialogs and events that went on to cover during the drama.  To be honest?  I think they felt they had a problem since I'd blow the whistle on them and they are right and they tried to threaten me, you see that as being something you feel would NEVER happen in this country?  I bet it does and I bet it went on here also.  As you said I write compelling letters, I also make compelling phone calls, and I get things right most ALL the time.  You think you are the first people on planet earth I've talked to?  You've got another thing coming.    Another point not in your favor, I have seen your approach and his before, I know what to look for in many situations, not just this one, I have expertise in areas you are NOT aware of since you don't know me, and I'd bet since I use them ALL and do so ALL the time, it works for me.  In other words I see through most crap right away but you won't know when that happens, too bad for Jimmy since this is far from over.  I have a special place for people who are this arrogant, and who take advantage of disabled people. What went on there is pure garbage and you don't treat people this way and NOT expect to hear about it.  You want to keep showing up to shove a sock in my mouth?  Guess what?

It comes back to why bother for you?  It takes a lot of effort.  How does it support Wakimoto, and why would you anyway?  I've lived places where people talked about 1/10th the rate I do and they like you must think I am from another planet.  I've been through a lot, I don't need this, I bet you don't either, and when all is said and done, I don't think Stacey and her offer of a "Woman's Opinion" helps either since the other approach you all use is to make two or three vague slams about me in as few words as possible, support none of it other than complain about the number of words, and then add your own color to my words, and then claim you know who I am AND then run to other posts as if to say "Look!!! Here!!!! Read this, he must have wrote this too!  All these complaints he must be making ALL OF THIS UP AND.... HE MUST BE SCHIZOPHRENIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GOOD LORD RUN AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"  Did you also want to show up at the movie theater and shout fire there also?  

Of course you are wrong with that and you know it and could not pretend to even begin to offer your medical opinions.  Doing so here or anywhere makes you very dangerous people indeed. I do hope nobody listens to you and decides to take their lives or start acting on your claims in any way up to and including popping pills to fix it.  Got that?  I'd suggest you put a cork in your opinion about others and their states of health until you get out of med school and actually see the patient in the flesh.  And if the world is full of people who all need to take pills since you can't read any complaints about anything, then I think this entire dialog is of no use to you and this whole website might as well be taken down since you see no merit in it.  You offer that all the other posters are flakes, Rita, Smoothie guy, whoever they are and whoever you are and whoever you THINK you are, and the list went on from there and you were even kind enough to imply I put effort into this and that I must be a smart guy, probably accurate on both counts.  But and I mean BUT, this STILL means there must be something wrong here since I am too smart now, I have too much to say, I see things going on that you might not pick up on as to what people are doing when they do something, or I see what is not spoken directly, etc.  

It all comes down to you are not able to agree that people do things for reasons that may not be obvious to you, or that they do them seemingly in a way that would make it seem that someone noticing it and calling them on it, would allow them a defense that would say it is not possible or it flies in the face of reality, common sense, or the like.  It would be called the defense of audacity, as in do something so evil to someone, nobody will believe you.  Consider the Jews in n**i Germany.  Or consider wasting a few dollars as part of a hobby where you get to purchase a run down apartment, dork around with some crap there, and then walk all over the people who have to live there.  This would be called an "Ego Trip" I'd guess.  People with money waste it in all kinds of interesting and not so nice ways, can you see that as being one?  I know some people who torture and fight animals since they are so bored, care to deny that also?  Wakimoto would not be the first person in the world, according to your "World View" that has decided he needs to have control over people and do so in his way and as he sees fit, did you notice any of that in your history lessons too?  You know, crooked people who like to take advantage of a group of people and do so just to be a rat b**tard?  Did you hear of that ever going on and I mean EVER going on in your "World View"?  Hmmm...something to think about.  What I said is true, this is not about the money since it was only a few bucks, somebody wanted to be a pain in my neck and to send me a message, think you've seen or heard of that being done also before?  Give it some thought.  Truth is that Wakimoto will not profit from what he did and I will be sure to see to it his reputation online suffers.  This IS what this is about.  Thanks for taking part.  You have served me well.

But since you pointed that out already and I seem to have you at a disadvantage, and I likely type faster than you talk, to be fair, do you THINK before you speak and/or type?  It would help since not all of us are fools.  Did you care to prove by example or otherwise ANY of your claims against me or of medical "Defect"?  I pointed out how and why you can not, did you plan all of that up front also?  Or did that surprise you?  Now what, you can claim it was too much to read as you had me heading off into the ozone looking at other reports, seeing if Lex Luthor was in my closet, and that I had visions of Satan hovering over Wakimoto's head.  Did you want to otherwise put more words into my mouth and possibly carve apart my cortex to support your theories?  Maybe you can offer a way to be right by using an ice pick in my eye, add some poison in my soup, and then shout look!  He is blind and drooling!  These reports must ALL be wrong now!  Have fun!  I sure am.  

You keep asking the same useless question that you already answered, yes Steve, you diagnosed me yourself as being "Mentally Ill" otherwise you would not have started out with that from the get go.  You ADMITTED JUST THAT ALREADY!!! And you even filled in the blanks for me and the people at home who never knew you were so clever AND that you could see if someone was sick in the head by using a computer and reading their complaints about asbestos and world wide termites.  Sorry, got to go now, this has really been fun but unless you have more proof of conspiracy theories and can speak better and more clearly as to what I think and believe in, both impossible, maybe you need a new approach?  Have you tried cutting out the tongues of people you don't want to listen to and who complain about your crooked friends?  Maybe they can add this to the Bill of Rights for you as something like the 81st Amendment to the US Constitution?  Talk it over amongst yourselves and see what your "Think Tank" can come up with next, I'll be here, I am not going anywhere.  

I never got an answer on the LSD use either, did that qualify you as a medical genius also? Your illegal drug use?  Did you do any meth or crack or shoot any heroin?  How about Drano?  Ever take a needle and shoot that into your eyeball or under your toenail?  I personally can't comment since I did not spend any time running poison into my flesh, so maybe that makes me lack your "Vision", what do you think?  But you are right, you are lazy, so is Robert, and so is Stacey.  You don't even seem to know how to argue either, shame since this really was a difficult call, I mean what a challenge, finding the flaws in that place really took some looking and a real clever wit to figure out.  And the sums of money involved here? Whew, I was sweating bullets over that $100 let me tell you.  Sorry, it has been fun, got to go now.  Ring me up once you figure any of this out, ok?

Steve - (USA) says -- "Ok, given that I am lazier than you, I am only go to respond to a smattering of what you wrote:"

Steve quotes me --"I don't think you can announce either that my "World View" is strange either, you don't know what I believe about the world at all."

Steve says - "I have a pretty good idea of what your general worldview is; a big part of it is ascribing malice and ulterior motives to people where there are none. "

This would be conjecture on your part and you never met me let alone know the first thing about my life experiences and my view of the world.  As you put it this is an idea, it is not fact.  I offer no claim of ulterior motives or malice not that they are lacking in the world, you'd offer people are not motivated by either malice or that they'd be dishonest?  At least you said something other than offering your medical opinion.  And you can not speak to any concept I'd apply to ALL people as you'd seem to want to do, again you claim to speak for me, and then vector right into dysfunction and now I must assign that ALL people are bad and they are ALL out to get you Steve. Run hurry!

Steve quotes me -- "You don't want to rent from Wakimoto at all. "

Steve says - "Quite a few times you have suggested that I claimed I would have no problem with the place you are staying, when I have said nothing of the sort. "

I never said that at all Steve, where did I in any of this offer that you'd want to live in this place, this is why we are here is it not?  I am telling you that you'd not want to rent here.  Next you offer what?  I am asking you to shop at White Castle?  I guess you did miss the point, too busy conjuring defect again and tossing it at me?

Steve quotes me -- "You just seem like someone who wants to run us all into the ditch."

Steve says - "A lot of your comments are like this; what makes you think I want to run anyone into a ditch, or have them suffer, or whatever? This is part of your worldview I was talking about. "

This is a statement ABOUT YOU STEVE, not the world, but YOU!  You just missed the whole thread up one comment from here, claim now that I said you should move there, and then you offer this.  I maintain that you are offering chaff to the wheat and noise to the signal.  You keep running into the same brick wall, offer your medical opinion and it is as though I come to you to fix my truck and you ask "Are you a l*****n?".  You keep getting off topic, we are talking about a slumlord, not me or my world view.  I am not the subject matter here, and your comments and statements are off mark.

Steve quotes me -- "You claim Wakimoto is right since I must be ill...."

Steve says - "Again, I never claimed Wakimoto was "right"; that has nothing to do with your illness. However, I do suspect that your perception of him is warped to where he seems like evil incarnate, when in reality he may just be a crappy landlord. "

You said I was ill by offering your diagnosis, I never said that, you want to read too much into all that is not written here and by what I did not say and that which you can not prove.  You think you suspect what I think now?  Ouch, that is going to be even harder to prove, maybe you think I am the AntiChrist?  I offer he is a crappy landlord who likes to put on little dramas for the sake of his renters to play on their vanity all so you can arrive later to call them nuts when their toilets don't flush and they die from Mesothelioma. You never asked if I was injured in any way either, you had plenty of room to do that and never did, as in have you lost your vision, or the use of a limb?  Why not?  First thing you fired off was your diagnosis of Schizophrenia.

Steve quotes me -- "Your claims of knowing me personally, or that you can attest to my world view, favorite pizza, or what I do and don't taste when someone shoves cyanide in my coffee or what reports are mine here and what are not, are STILL falling on deaf ears."

Steve says - "I do indeed have a good idea of your worldview based on your writings, as I have already stated. The tasting bit I got directly from you; I am just taking your word for it. As for what reports are yours, they are very easy to pick out, partially because of your syntax, and partially because of your worldview which is expressed in them."

Again, your worldview concept is not working for me, you know why?  You don't know all that has gone on here, you are right, you DO NOT have all the reports, and you do NOT know who I am, who I know, who knows me, my relation to ANY of these people, I may have had prior relations with ALL of them, NONE or them, or SOME OF THEM.  They may in fact ALL KNOW EACH OTHER and as such do the same thing to me.  I already outlined I am a victim of violence, do you accept such people do exist in the "Worldview" that you have?  Start with that.

Steve quotes me --"Also you want Wakimoto to defend himself?  How?"

Steve says - "I just think it would give us a better take on the situation if we at least heard his side of things on this thread. Yeah, he could lie, as could you, but it would be more interesting."

He already lied to me and his other residents, why bother?  I am the injured party and not him!  I had to live there he did not.  I had to put up with the crap, the piss, the not working this, the paint dust, the broken windows and it goes on as that.  His claim is that it takes him 2 months to make a window so you can close and lock it?  And to what of the asbestos?  There is NO answer he can give you other than lie about it, since it is what it is.  You can not live in asbestos, with termites and roaches, or windows that are not present and can not be locked or in the dark.  He has to fix them and did not.  End of story.  Others witness this and it is still there now to this day.  You won't fix it either.  I would lie about this why?   It won't do ME any good and all I get is grief from people like YOU!

Steve quotes me --"I can't help you Steve, others will see through you, and Wakimoto..."

Steve says - "Again, you seem to lump me in with your nemesis. What is there for people to "see through"? This seems to imply I have a hidden agenda, which again you seem to ascribe to people for no reason."

Again Steve you create a "Nemesis' where there is none.  Wakimoto is a small fish in my world and not worth worry or bother.  He needs not to take advantage of you or others, I have already made back the money I lost and it was worth every cent I spent to learn what I know.  You seem to invent for me all kinds of hidden dramas that do not exist and are too quick to point out faults that are not there, and that are conjecture and exaggeration on your part.  You seem to imply that I feel that Wakimoto is your version of my Lex Luthor or some such.  He is not.  You keep running back to the medicine cabinet for answers in the hope that you can discredit me.  Why ask at all and offer your diagnosis?  You admit now you were wrong as I pointed out to you?  You claim to divine mental defect based on written witness of deplorable living conditions and dishonest landlords.  Why is that my dysfunction?  This is what I have trouble with when it comes to you, you hold on too fast to your initial medical miracle and then fail to see why that matters to me, your want to know my medical history, but only one narrow aspect of it, seems, well dishonest of you.  What does it matter if I was color blind for instance?  You did not choose that either, but instead went for something else that conveniently would imply I think the earth is flat, aliens are living in the woodwork, and that the termites are my friends they speak to me just like you do.  I never said any of that either, did you hope to suggest it?  And that would somehow make Wakimoto ok to rip off the next person, see the problem with that conflict of interest and the otherwise dubious manner in which you did it all?

Steve quotes me --"You spend too much time on this, what is your interest in it?"

Steve says - "You are absolutely right that I spend WAY too much time on this site in general. I have no idea what the addiction is; I discovered it a month or so and can't get away. As far as your posts go, they are interesting. I certainly do not "sift through" posts looking for similarities, but your style sticks out like a sore thumb that it is impossible to now be able to see instantly when it is you posting. "

Someone must have since I doubt all those posts just fell onto your sore thumb?  But if it is not possible to see instantly you must have had to troll for them all, why all the effort?  Why the steadfast want to offer me a mental health illness now?  What is in it for me?  What is in it for you?  What is in it for Jimmy?  My writing style means nothing and proves nothing and you think you must recognize who I am but you don't know me, we have not met, and now you claim to offer not only medical diagnostics for me and NOW you can speak to what I believe in. Are you God Steve?   I have to ask you that since now you imply that you are Omniscient, Omnipresent, and possibly with that Omnipotent.  We can leave the last one open but all knowing and all seeing all the time everywhere gets you close to that, so how is it for you?  What am I thinking now and is the world out to get you, in my opinion, please tell me what it is?

Steve quotes me --"After all I could just take your claim [that I am ill] at face value"

Steve says - "Oh for heavens' sake, how many times do I have to tell you that I make no medical claims about you? All I have asked you, repeatedly, is if anyone HAS made such a claim about you. You refuse to answer this. "

Yes you did Steve, you already pointed out that I am Schizophrenic, I can go back and read that back for you if you like it is up there ^^^^^^^. I pointed out to you that this could not be determined and that you were wrong since it is all or nothing, read what I wrote about your notion of having a "Smattering" of this "Illness" you pointed out I have.  You even provided evidence of that and this is part of why you defer to these other posts that you claim support your offer of this "Disease" where now my "World View" is distorted is that not right? Maybe I now have amnesia, does that work for you also?  How does that relate, what do YOU do with that knowledge and what does ANYONE ELSE do with that?  What does THAT REALLY MEAN?????  What does that mean to Jimmy Wakimoto and for you or Octavio or his brother?

Steve quotes me --"You never asked me any question directly you just went ahead and ASSUMED you knew what you are talking about AND you made your own diagnosis."

Steve says - "THAT IS ABSOLUTELY, 100% FALSE. Look at my very first post on this thread - it was an absolutely straight forward, direct question: "Have you ever been diagnosed with schizophrenia?". You then flew off the handle, without answering the question. You still have not."

Oops, hold on folks lets get the lawyers out here, maybe Steve has a case here, it seems that he was clever enough to pose his question without offering any information at all AND he used clever wording to get it out there first!  This might mean that Steve was not baiting me into a response and making some kind of non sequitur based accusation that anyone would logically offer ANYONE who comes here and files a report.  Steve must first show up to fire the first volley and ask "Are you mentally ill?"  I could offer God yes Steve!  All that termite poison has caused me to go BLIND!!!!  But nope, wait, you went right for it Steve sorry, your words are up there, go back and read them, you said and I quote you here for your benefit:

#1 Consumer Comment  So.... why don't you move?
AUTHOR: Steve - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Monday, February 13, 2012  -- Seems strange that you are staying there. BTW, have you ever been diagnosed with schizophrenia?

SO there you are, number one, you start right off making a number of bogus remarks in those few words.  That being, just move and shut up.  It defeats the purpose of this venue to make the first post to a complaint of the ilk "Don't worry about it".  You can see that.  Again you are not much help agreed?  Then now it is "Strange" I am staying there.  Why is that?  How long was I there, when did this happen, how long did it go on, when did I know what, at what point did I find this all out?  You knew all of that of course?  AND your next important point, since I must be the problem here and NOT the landlord, you said "BTW, have you ever been diagnosed with schizophrenia?"  And my thought is who the hell cares?  You now cleverly wait for someone else to do the dirty work for you, enter Stacey to claim just that, I am the problem here and not ALL those other FINE FOLKS WHO RUN THOSE GOLLY NICE BUSINESSES!!!  Yessirree, right on da money.  Again, you keep running into the same ditch.  What does that have to do with anything?  I might have been diagnosed with a brain tumor and they found it was actually you hitting me in the back of the head.  But we don't know that either do we?  Why not ask if I have been diagnosed with lung cancer and lupus?  I mean my sore thumb that sticks out is not half as bad as the termites in my lungs when I sleep or the toilet that does not flush.  These must be my insanity? And at that of the others who live there and have to call the plumber too since the Mexicans can't read the directions since they are in English and not German?

You already offered strange, and an odd suggestion I just move and not complain about it, and again this seems odd of YOU and not me.  I ask again, do you just lurk here and do this to all posters?  Do you meet with similar results?  And when I string you along a little to point out the problem with your approach, you imply I "Fly off the handle", how is that, then you do go on to say you read your diagnosis into that by all you read here and cleverly enough others show up later to suggest you did not just read it all and diagnose it based on the one report but now you made your foolish discovery by not reading all the other nonsense I wrote about unrelated things..... Sound about right?  And the offer that these other reports support your claim of what was it?  Schizophrenia?  What are the symptoms of that illness and how does one diagnose it?  Tell me the clinical assessments that are needed and what would one expect to encounter by doing so?  Lay out your expertise in these matters for us.  I do hope you are consistent and tell us this can be diagnosed along with ALL mental illness from thousands of miles away, by NOT meeting the patient ONCE EVER, and just by reading things he has typed on the computer.  That is your offer of proof and your offer of diagnostic for your "Illness" you claim I have.  Did your hole get deeper?

Steve quotes me --"You don't offer it for any reason than to apply stigma."

Steve says - "Again, 100% false. I have made it clear that having mental issues is nothing to be ashamed of, and is not one's own fault."

I offered no shame at all, who said that? I said stigma, you prefer to use it as a silver bullet to discredit someone who has a concern with someone else who has broken the law to harm him.  It is an obvious dodge, the problem with it is a mile wide, a mile high, and a mile deep.  You can't see that? It comes back to a few things, you already went for it, and failed, you are attempting to back peddle now and recover, and you are not getting out of it that easy, and you can not prove it at all.  The fact you went there is enough.  And I keep pointing all that out and how it does not matter at all and that you look cheap for making the cheap shots you did.  That is all.  Even Stacey offers that I must be insane since I "Ramble" and as such all of this is my fault, that was said, you see that too right?  And Robert's point is different how? You are all wrong.

Steve quotes me --[To Robert]: "You can't prove to me that you are not Steve..."

Steve says - "True, there is no way to prove that I am not Robert, but I wouldn't see the point in having multiple accounts on here. We are all anonymous anyway. I use the name "Steve" so that people can know who I am in relation to other discussions. You may want to do the same. In any event, you seem to lump all those you disagree with into one person anyway."

So you concede then that you don't know who Robert is? And you don't know who I am either, that helps your offer of what you present certainly and is WHAT I SAID ALL ALONG.  You have no clue who I am or who is writing what when.  Keep in mind I am serious about this and I'd not type all of this otherwise.  I make an effort here, I think you are not being square with me and keep heading for the pill bottle.  Leave it out of the mess, it won't help you now, later, or in the past.


Steve says - "And as far as the three links you posted, they are obviously not posts by you. But again, why not sign up for an account and put a fake name on it, so at least we have a name to call you by, and refer to each others' posts?"


Are you sure? Want to test that theory out? I can post a few more and have you read them, see if I can not fool you again by not typing something differently the next time?  I bet I can fool you 100% of the time.


Steve says - "And as always, the question (not the diagnosis) stands: have you ever been diagnosed with a mental illness? In fact, I'll throw another one in - is it because of said diagnosis that you get money from the government?

You can never know or prove anything, you could determine that just by looking at my injuries but since you never have laid eyes on me, you can't do even that.  You already claimed to diagnose me, why bother asking me since your opinion is the only one that matters here or to anyone else, is that not right? Why do you keep going back to that?  You already claimed a number of fallacious and inaccurate not to mention defamatory things about me, stand by them, don't ask me, prove it to us as you claim you can!  You never bothered to ask if I have a fake hand either, why? Maybe I am blind and have no hands and as such could not have typed ANY of this?  Maybe my wife witnessed all of this with my family and they wrote it all for me?  You knew that also?

I might also have MS, this affects the brain, is that a mental "Illness" and how does that fit with your want to know about a slumlord.  How do YOU use that information here?  How does it matter, you never answer the questions I ask of you especially that one.  Why is that? Oh I forgot, you are too lazy!  I've asked you how many times to say something and you wait till now to actually address at least a few of the points I raise????  Did you just wake up?  Or again what of amnesia, how would that be of interest relative to Wakimoto and a crappy apartment he is too cheap to fix?

Again, we are talking about Jimmy Wakimoto, the SlumLord at 616 Orange Ave Long Beach, CA 90802.    Termites, Roaches, Asbestos, Broken Windows, Not Working Toilets, etc, care to comment or maybe Jimmy is mentally ill along with his building?  Why not ask that?

Stacey  - Dallas (U.S.A.) says -- "You have filed mutiple reports about the same thing under the anonymous post from Houston, Texas.  Your long rambling reports are hard to miss.  Sounds like you are the problem and not the businesses."

You can't prove that Stacey.  None of what you claim there you can know at all. And it is just as unlikely I am the problem at all.  I am not in the landlord business.  Seems like we have a power troika going on here since you all likely know each other?  I don't think your safety in numbers approach is any more than the transparent dodge you create it as.  You are too clever splitting up your information and what is posted where and by who all to see if you can dissociate yourselves from each other or the fact you arrive just to snipe.  My guess, in any event, unrelated posts are just that.  Unrelated and have no bearing on this one, again you don't know anything about me or the posts or who wrote them.  Maybe you know Steve and Robert, but you don't know me and don't know where I've been, or anything about me.  And you are not able to casually cast off reports at the wave of your hand as you want to do.  I welcome you to do as you do, since it makes you look less credible and me more so, I make the effort and I make sense, you don't.  Do you deny knowing each other and work together to offer what is likely the same template of attack on behalf of people you care to protect and allow to harm others for profit?  I hope when you end up in a wheelchair someone like Wakimoto is there to rip you off.  Sounds fair now doesn't it? Keep in mind a number of inaccurate claims have already been made about me personally including medical diagnosis that would not be possible based on ANY of my typed dialog here.  Not possible at ALL even by Dr. Freud himself, let alone mere mortals like you!  You like to think you can diagnose the mental state and capacity and find defect with a man from a keyboard and written letters?  You might as well attempt to save Private Ryan from certain death at the hands of the Taliban for God's sake.

You arrive to make grossly exaggerated and inaccurate statements about posters you know nothing about.  How are other posts about the same thing? They look to be all different to me. The businesses are all different, I only see one entry for this property, what would others have to do with this?  You are the one rambling, as are Robert and Steve who along with you have missed the whole point of the discussion.  That being a slumlord, termites, broken windows, windows that do not lock, paint that is chipping off and falling into your food, roaches, lamps that have no globes, missing parts, are broken, and asbestos.  The asbestos is documented, the termites are as well, the other concerns are visible for the most part, and the list goes on.  How are those my fault?  Is it my fault there are termites at this location?  No.  Is it my fault there are roaches there?  No.  Is it my fault the windows are broken and not painted?  No.  You must be kidding Stacey?  Are you from another planet?  How would this as proven by other complaints about unrelated topics make all that my fault?  It makes no sense.  You might as well come to comment that since your car broke down the other day and the dealer won't fix it, that since you never complained about me and all this wasted type that this is my fault. It is equally plausible you could claim such a thing and it would not make any sense either.  

You claim to offer that well written responses to other's questions that are off topic now for some reason would be my fault they are off topic.  Now you even allow others to cite that they are off topic and prove that to you by citing other posts with the claim I have written them but they have nothing to do with this complaint and the merits of it.  So in effect you just want to pretend you know what you are talking about and make a number of inaccurate statements of non-fact.  On what do you base the fact that a slumlord's problems are my fault?  The fact you can't read more than one line of text without it being considered as rambling?  I bet I write better than you do and make more sense doing it.  You won't prove any of what you just said either and I can prove all that I have said here and otherwise.  I don't think anyone else will put any stock in what you say.  I will defer to my opinion, the fact this is not the only place I'd file complaints about it, and none of the other residents there disagree with me.  And that includes people who lived in that area, delivery people, utility workers, and public health folks.  Care to dispute that also?  You won't.

Stacey, eventually you will learn there is hazard in offering opinions that you can never support and that would likely be dishonest on their face.  Such as what you did here just now.  People see them for what they are,  dishonest and inaccurate and likely just born of malice and spite for someone you don't want to hear complain.  At least I am not talking your ear off about this, you can read something else or watch Beavis and Butthead, not that Steve and Robert make you not look like the Third Stooge.  Ha ha ha ha ha.

Anyway, you make no sense at all.  I guess you just wasted your one chance to make fools of yourselves on this site, since I will use your logic against you then.  All the other crap you've said here just now and the other crap you've said in the past is consistent.  If more than one report is sufficient in your mind to discredit someone for some reason, then your efforts to read through them all for some reason, complain they are too long, too rambling, etc and respond with some wild a*s guesses about complete unrelated nonsense make you the bigger fraud here.  Wakimoto is still the problem and supporting him makes you look like, well, I said it before, felons.  You will love the company and birds of a feather as they say!  I won't waste much more time with you since you don't make credible supporters of criminals who don't need your help and should clean up their properties.  But if you love the guy so much, go live with the termites and cat piss.  I could care less what you do.  Touche!

Ok, given that I am lazier than you, I am only go to respond to a smattering of what you wrote:

"I don't think you can announce either that my "World View" is strange either, you don't know what I believe about the world at all."
I have a pretty good idea of what your general worldview is; a big part of it is ascribing malice and ulterior motives to people where there are none. 

"You don't want to rent from Wakimoto at all. "
Quite a few times you have suggested that I claimed I would have no problem with the place you are staying, when I have said nothing of the sort. 

"You just seem like someone who wants to run us all into the ditch."
A lot of your comments are like this; what makes you think I want to run anyone into a ditch, or have them suffer, or whatever? This is part of your worldview I was talking about. 

"You claim Wakimoto is right since I must be ill...."
Again, I never claimed Wakimoto was "right"; that has nothing to do with your illness. However, I do suspect that your perception of him is warped to where he seems like evil incarnate, when in reality he may just be a crappy landlord. 

"Your claims of knowing me personally, or that you can attest to my world view, favorite pizza, or what I do and don't taste when someone shoves cyanide in my coffee or what reports are mine here and what are not, are STILL falling on deaf ears."
I do indeed have a good idea of your worldview based on your writings, as I have already stated. The tasting bit I got directly from you; I am just taking your word for it. As for what reports are yours, they are very easy to pick out, partially because of your syntax, and partially because of your worldview which is expressed in them.

"Also you want Wakimoto to defend himself?  How?"
I just think it would give us a better take on the situation if we at least heard his side of things on this thread. Yeah, he could lie, as could you, but it would be more interesting.

"I can't help you Steve, others will see through you, and Wakimoto..."
Again, you seem to lump me in with your nemesis. What is there for people to "see through"? This seems to imply I have a hidden agenda, which again you seem to ascribe to people for no reason.

"You spend too much time on this, what is your interest in it?"
You are absolutely right that I spend WAY too much time on this site in general. I have no idea what the addiction is; I discovered it a month or so and can't get away. As far as your posts go, they are interesting. I certainly do not "sift through" posts looking for similarities, but your style sticks out like a sore thumb that it is impossible to now be able to see instantly when it is you posting. 

"After all I could just take your claim [that I am ill] at face value"
Oh for heavens' sake, how many times do I have to tell you that I make no medical claims about you? All I have asked you, repeatedly, is if anyone HAS made such a claim about you. You refuse to answer this. 

"You never asked me any question directly you just went ahead and ASSUMED you knew what you are talking about AND you made your own diagnosis."
THAT IS ABSOLUTELY, 100% FALSE. Look at my very first post on this thread - it was an absolutely straight forward, direct question: "Have you ever been diagnosed with schizophrenia?". You then flew off the handle, without answering the question. You still have not.

"You don't offer it for any reason than to apply stigma."
Again, 100% false. I have made it clear that having mental issues is nothing to be ashamed of, and is not one's own fault.

[To Robert]: "You can't prove to me that you are not Steve..."
True, there is no way to prove that I am not Robert, but I wouldn't see the point in having multiple accounts on here. We are all anonymous anyway. I use the name "Steve" so that people can know who I am in relation to other discussions. You may want to do the same. In any event, you seem to lump all those you disagree with into one person anyway.


And as far as the three links you posted, they are obviously not posts by you. But again, why not sign up for an account and put a fake name on it, so at least we have a name to call you by, and refer to each others' posts? 

And as always, the question (not the diagnosis) stands: have you ever been diagnosed with a mental illness? In fact, I'll throw another one in - is it because of said diagnosis that you get money from the government? 

Robert says -- "Sorry but I am not Steve."

Are you sure, you seem to be able to tell the difference between Steve, Steve, Steve, Steve, and Steve. How is that different than Anonymous, Anonymous, Anonymous, and Anonymous,  and Anonymous?  You can't prove to me that you are not Steve any sooner than you could prove to anyone else who's posts ANY of these are.  You can't do it.

Robert says -- "I will say that your style is quite unique, and still think you are giving Rita and a few others a run for their money.  But since you seem to wonder what other reports I think you wrote..well here they are.  I think I'll let others decide for themselves if they agreee."

What does that have to do with Jimmy Wakimoto, and slumlords in general? How does that offer ANYTHING to the discussion?   Are you sure those are my reports?  You can prove that?  Why does that matter to you?

Robert says -- "Here are the one's on the Motels"

.....and goes on to include links to other reports here in the website.  I'll omit them for now.

Robert says -- "Now will I say that you got me in one area.  I don't know how many reports you have written.  I would not be surprised if I missed some.  So perhaps you can enlighten us on any other reports you have posted."

Why would I do that?  What is the point of that, why don't you include ALL YOUR posts here and do so for Steve also and lets see if you are consistent in just showing up and making bogus medical claims that imply we are all nuts for being here.  Express to us how much time you waste in looking for all those connections, and any manner of detail you can find fault with but could never prove since you don't even know who I am, or if anyone else named Steve here is this Steve, that Steve or any other.  What is the point of doing so? But if you don't know how many I have written then how can you know if I have written ANY other than this one here?  You aren't that good.  And even if you were, you'd have no way to be sure.  I could be sitting next to you at any time in the future and you'd not know it.  Or who wrote those other reports, that is the problem you are having.  Suggesting all the things you did, note that you never conceded you were wrong about anything and neither did Steve so it seems you can't really discuss anything I've pointed out.  You just toss out a few ill formed suggestions in ten words or less and expect you've demonstrated some kind of intellect and with that must know what you are talking about relative to folks you don't know, never met, would not know if they stepped on your toe in 5 minutes, and could no sooner attribute to any other post in reality including this one here.  This could in fact be written by 10 different folks over the course of a week and still you could not know that.  You have a closed mind, can't see the obvious, are not willing to admit you are wrong, prefer to miss the entire point, and seem to like to support slumlords. I wonder why that is?  It makes me happy to see such nonsense aired in the daylight.  Keep working on it, you are getting in deeper, keep digging.

But wait, here is another post maybe this is mine, why not find fault with it for all those "Over the top" claims laid out here.  Did you miss this one, how did you perform your search for all of my reports?

http://www.ripoffreport.com/liars/chris-nunely/chris-nunely-slumlord-will-h*o-88a8b.htm

http://www.ripoffreport.com/auto-dealers/courtesy-ford-of-con/courtesy-ford-of-conyers-cour-0aca9.htm

http://www.ripoffreport.com/internet-services/best-choice-products/best-choice-products-sky-billi-6fc5e.htm

There how about those three?  Do you know those people and why have you not bothered discussing anything with them or about them?  Do you know them also?  Do they live in Irvine also?  Are you sure I don't live there either?

You have filed mutiple reports about the same thing under the anonymous post from Houston, Texas.  Your long rambling reports are hard to miss.  Sounds like you are the problem and not the businesses.

I'd also point out that Steve and Robert make too much effort, far too much effort, to sift through all the other posts on this site looking for connections that are not there or that do not relate.  You make the mistake of getting FAR too involved, SPENDING FAR TOO MUCH TIME, and effort, to read all of that, inspect the style of prose and grammatical constructs, and when all is said and done you already shot yourselves in the a*s since you've already complained it is too much to read!  So why then bother looking for 5, 10, or 50 more posts similar to mine that you can now "Blame The Victim" for again?  See you make fools of yourselves here and the logical mind says you spend too much effort attempting to discredit perfect strangers you know nothing about and may as well take at face value.  After all, when I read other reviews, if they make sense and are reasonably well written to the point someone took the time to bother, they are probably worth checking out or in this case, rent one of the 1,000 other apartments in that area.  I mean if you are at the supermarket and the melons look rotten, do you want to take them home and eat them just because the produce guys said they were no good?  They must be crazy also?  
I think you guys are nuts for wasting all this time making responses that are designed to mime and invert mine, and just send them back my way and THEN waste all the time complaining about things you can not dispute or claim to begin with since you have no witness of them, and THEN you resort to complaints about too much to read!  I'd suggest don't read it and don't respond since it seems to upset you, or you can't make sense of it, or you feel a need to remedy it with a pill, somehow, or whatever escape mechanism you'd like to offer to make it palatable for you.  If you can not accept a dirty carpet and the other items in disrepair, I think you will trouble with the more advanced concepts such as offering medical opinion.  After all I could just take your claim at face value since I have now been diagnosed with a mental illness as per you, and run off and start popping all kinds of pills to fix that.  How is that going to work now?  You offer I need to ingest more of what this time to repair Jimmy Wakimoto's reputation since he can not spend $100 to fix some lights, clean a carpet, and to fix a toilet flush handle?  What is my time worth?  Yours?  One hundred dollars?  And the man complains about spending $3.00 for supplies OF THAT $100, get this, so he could replace the carpet instead of CLEAN IT!  And you support his logic over mine?  You both make NO d**n sense at all.   NONE!  

You never asked me any question directly you just went ahead and ASSUMED you knew what you are talking about AND you made your own diagnosis.  Support your claims somehow, you keep avoiding mine, it really is not your place to ask is it? And it is too late since you already went ahead and shot first and asked questions later.  You don't offer it for any reason than to apply stigma.  Are your days of popping LSD over?  What dementia can you apply to the situation now based on your admitted trips down hallucinogenic heaven's stairway you want to purchase for us?

I don't think you can announce either that my "World View" is strange either, you don't know what I believe about the world at all.   In fact I bet I have a good idea how the world works and I don't think I am wrong in saying it is a jungle out there, you need to take care you don't get ripped off, and again what I think of the world does not make unpainted windows, termites, asbestos, carpets that need to be cleaned, wiring that does not work, holes in the wall, plumbing that does not work, no want to fix that, and the other nonsense that goes on acceptable to you or me. As in repairs being done ALL the time at ALL hours and every day someone will be in your place, it all is the same thing.  These are the points I suggest you stay with those.  You don't want to rent from Wakimoto at all.  Leave it at that.  My world view is not part of this problem, I don't want to live with that crap, forget all the other distractions you offer, I bet you don't want to put up with that either.  Leave it at that since the rest you just seem like someone who wants to run us all into the ditch.  I'd rather we stayed on target.

It is all the same thing, I make an effort here with you, good faith effort, you return to a reasonable stance about the things of merit and concern, I end up back with you, you vector off into la la land and claim Wakimoto is right since I must be ill and you open the door again to looking like something else and then support the notion that Wakimoto is a vigilante and you offer motive for his actions.  You must smell a trap in that as I am sure he does now, since you need to be careful how you mistreat people and why for that reason certainly.  Your claims of knowing me personally, or that you can attest to my world view, favorite pizza, or what I do and don't taste when someone shoves cyanide in my coffee or what reports are mine here and what are not, are STILL falling on deaf ears.  You are getting nowhere but lost with them and it seems we keep getting lost for some reason and I keep showing you the way.  When does it end for you?  As I said I can do this forever and I have NO problem explaining me and what went on here, there, or anywhere else for that matter.  I am upset about this, rightly so, accept THAT fact also and move on.

Also to you want Wakimoto to defend himself?  How?  He had how long to resolve all of this and refused to, there is no defense to it, he had a chance to make it work and he chose not to, what do I care what he says now?  He will lie to you as he lied to me and lie to others about you and lie to others about me.  What does he care if you die in the cold?  If he does not get your money then he does not care.  What do you expect him to say?  I love cat piss?  Don't you?  I eat termites for dinner, don't you love living with them?  I love holes in the wall and can't be bothered to fix them?  I don't think you need working lamps or fixtures in your apartment?  Not much wiggle room in all of that I'd say.  What do you think Steve?   As you said, if he wanted to defend himself, why not just make it right and I don't need to leave as you pointed out I have to do or would be insane not doing?  Ugh, you know what?  This is over, take it or leave it, I can't help you Steve, others will see through you, and Wakimoto and see that I am right.  Take care dude and good luck.

Sorry but I am not Steve. 

I will say that your style is quite unique, and still think you are giving Rita and a few others a run for their money.  But since you seem to wonder what other reports I think you wrote..well here they are.  I think I'll let others decide for themselves if they agreee.

Here are the one's on the Motels
http://www.ripoffreport.com/hotel/studio-6-6050-kissim/studio-6-6050-kissimmee-flori-14e17.htm
http://www.ripoffreport.com/hotel/studio-6-tucson-6002/studio-6-tucson-6002-abusiv-b7915.htm

Here is the one from Austin
http://www.ripoffreport.com/sales-people/austin-apartments-no/austin-apartments-now-robert-g-d16cb.htm

Now will I say that you got me in one area.  I don't know how many reports you have written.  I would not be surprised if I missed some.  So perhaps you can enlighten us on any other reports you have posted.

Have you ever been diagnosed with a mental illness?

Steve thanks for that, at least that is candid of you AND I admire you making an effort to understand.  I think your point is well formed, I know what you mean, but again you defend the position I am somehow wrong for the injuries I've sustained and you are dancing back and forth between they are real and imagined and I am still not working with you offering what was it?  Mental disease of some sort?  You never mentioned injury, I did, so violent harm is violent harm, not mental illness.  They are two different things AND have to remain that way. 

You also pointed out that my responses are well formed, of course, I know what I am talking about, and I can explain this all to you as I've done, but now you are still attempting to find fault with me to wish it all away?  As in now the nature of my response is somehow of the wrong "Flavor" or some such, what is that?  I am d**n upset, not just at Wakimoto, but at others of course who allow him to do as he does, that is not my fault that is his still, it does not make him right or me wrong.  He is in the wrong, accept that fact and MOVE ON.  I am taking care of me, and I am taking care of Wakimoto, thanks.  I don't need you to offer medical advice, thanks anyway.  It does not help.

And the other reports and how I file them, where, when, about who, is my business and will remain that way for obvious reasons, part of that is to protect me, my identity, and ensure I am not party to retaliation, you can see that also of course.  It matters not what they are since it does not make Wakimoto, or them right.  You agree with this now?  Beyond that I don't know what to tell you and I don't agree with your diagnosis as I have already iterated AT GREAT LENGTH.  You won't convince me of it nor the merit of the claim.   It is finished.  Again, I made a huge effort here, Wakimoto screwed it up as he seemed to want to do, let him pay for it, and take your money someplace else.  If he wants to keep a slum, let him wallow in his quagmire, I won't contribute to it or enrich him for it.   Make him pay for it.

You guys are both wrong as is Wakimoto, why defend him at all?  Go see the place for yourself, talk to other residents, want their names?  Talk to past residents, how where they treated, what was done to them?  I'd also point out you are out of your league and your feeble claims of support for him and attempts to discredit me did you more harm than good and it won't help Wakimoto either.  Wakimoto is wrong and that is demonstrable, why you'd attack me to support him is another matter, and the bloody mess of my flesh I have to live with is my concern, it has nothing to do with what is wrong on Orange Avenue in Long Beach.  Two different concerns altogether and me not being able to walk does not make Wakimoto an honest man nor does it support your want to call it something else for him.

It is an important point since Steve offers what others seem to also offer which is a fairly well thought out and intentionally misleading defense of doing bad things to people using a stigma and character assassination approach to it get away with it.  The bad acts alone are sufficient to support what was done, and attacking the people who got harmed is not sufficient to make the initial crimes you ripped them off by doing go away.  Finding fault with me next year for the crime you d**n near killed me with today, does not make you right, it does not mean it never happened, and it does not make me wrong now and you right.  Once you pierce my flesh, you did the deed and the damage is done, you won't run the knife backwards across the wound to fix it, nor reverse the bullet you fired into my back and heal me by good deeds and kind words designed to insult me.  Doing both those things to blood let me and by those who came as a friend, and by chaining me to a tree, does not make you a hero and me less of a man either.  You can think about all of that before you come here and call me any name at all or accuse me of anything.

Barring all of that, rent from Wakimoto since I don't know what I am talking about and enjoy the drama.  I bet you will love it.

You also fall into another trap and that is the offer and attempt to use the "I don't need you to tell me what was done to me" defense in this situation and attempt to apply it to other situations on my vanity.  In this situation I don't need your advice as to what is wrong, how it does not work, or how Wakimoto is not being honest or what I need to do about it.  All you need to do is see for yourself, give it a look, rent from him or not, accept what I write or not, you won't change my mind nor add anything to the truth by what you've offered here so far.  Nor will you change my mind about any of it in the future, what happened is what happened, you won't modify that by calling me names or offering medical "Opinion".  You look worse for it, and if it is determined you worked with Wakimoto it won't help him either, you can both be made to look worse by association.  But why should I save your bacon?

What happened here may or may not relate to other violent things done to me or others, say someone being beaten until they pass out and wake not knowing what happened.  Attempting to confuse one with the other, or claim that what applies in one situation must apply in all, and as such would even be invertable at some level is an obvious trap for you or anyone who'd even go there.  Consider that also.  If you are coming here to support Wakimoto or be a diplomat for law enforcement who should have fixed this right, you are doing them and you more harm than good.  As I said, keep talking, I will ruin you or anyone else with all of this, I told you, you have it wrong.  You won't win this one either.

Steve feels a need to belabor the obvious and argue a point he can't win or prove but he says -- "The only other one I know of is where you had to pay a year's worth of rent in Austin (and yes, I can spot your writing style a mile away)."

To which I say so what?  That does not prove anything and I doubt you can say who wrote what here at all. If you can notice my style of writing you can also copy it, so that point just got removed, it still does not support the fact that you can know who writes what here.  I can even edit your posts without you knowing it and write them as you, or you of I, and then you don't even know what you wrote any more.  I come back to the same thing, so what?  You keep arguing a point that still is not worth discussing.  That being, more than one report, I discussed that already and you and Robert are of like mind, that being you are too busy intentionally getting lost in that which is not here and that which you can not possibly know or prove.  It is that easy. Why dwell in fantasy land as you do?  I can change my writing style at will and why waste your time in attempting to find the forest for the trees?

Steve says -- "Anyway, on to your points. You did not seem to imply that you were getting out of your current apartment in your current post. Since you are, cool. And I never said you have no right to complain (though you should forward your complaint to your landlord so he can defend himself). I think this is the biggest misunderstanding you have of what I was trying to say."

To be fair, you just offered a medical defense that you could not establish and I pointed that out.  It was not of benefit to all we have here.  What I am doing currently is my business, where do you live Steve, what is your SSN and DOB, and what are you doing this evening so maybe I can know more about you?  Get the idea now?  I think my overall plans are going to be up to me and what I do is now up to me, landlord is in the wrong, how long I put up with it IS up to ME.  And when I decide what that is, then I will do it.  Again, recall I mentioned all of that and your "Solution" is overly simplistic and seems to deny the harm and then runs back to a medical miracle to make me look the fool.  This is where I am at.  Again, why did you go there at all is the question?  It makes you look not on the up and up, that much we can be sure of.  I think you just keep digging the hole deeper now I've given you a larger shovel.  Again, tossing that comment out from the get go is what it is.  And the next bit of tripe is of the same ilk, tripe:

Steve says -- "As far as your description of the place, it definitely seems like an exaggeration (come on, dude, feces/urine in the closet)?"

Why is that?  Studio had hardwood floors in living area, ceramic tile in the bathroom and kitchen, there was pet damage to the wood floor outside the closet, closet had carpeting, and the hallway and damage to hardwood floor had been "Repaired" with duct tape.  My guess, someone kept a pet in the closet and allowed it to soil the carpet in there for some time.  The pad was soaked with urine and crap and it took a lot of effort to clean it.  You can't conceive of this why?  How would that be an exaggeration?  I've seen homes that had to be TORN DOWN since the people living there allowed the DOZENS of cats they owned to urinate all over the floors, walls, carpets, porches, etc.  More than once, and I'd say whoever lived there was not the cleanest pet owner there was.  I was not happy to have to clean it up.  Landlord's response?  To complain that he had to spend $3.00 for the peroxide and shampoo I used since he would have replaced it, at additional cost beyond my gift to him.  Right, sounds like more drama and hogwash to me that someone would not accept someone's offer to clean that up and only expect him to pay for the supplies, how cheap can you get?  I think you are not being honest if you can't imagine that a carpet would be soaked with animal output or dirt, any more than you could not imagine or understand that you got ripped off when you ordered something from Ebay.  Be honest with yourself at least, this does not seem exaggerated.  And with that landlord was not willing to pay for ANYTHING, a few dollars for the cleanup, a toilet handle that was broken, etc. Not one cent.  This is beyond cheap as I said and it meant to me he was not willing to fix it, money is not the object, he does it to prove a point and put us at risk or to be treated like 2nd class citizens. He could afford to fix it and it would be good business sense to do so but he prefers not to.  I saw that a mile away and I smelled you coming before you got here Steve.  I think your mile wide blindness makes trouble for you.

Steve says -- "And I have made no "medical diagnosis" of you; I am simply making a well-educated guess based on your writings. Could be right, could be wrong, but I'm playing the right odds here."

You did offer one already, as you still claim, so yes you did and yes you are.  And now you are doing just that and then you are not, what way is it now?  You still claim your guess, and it is a guess now as you claim, not a diagnosis, is educated, well educated at that, but then again you now claim you never mentioned either?  Oh and now you are making a well educated guess?  You already read what I wrote? It is not possible to be a little bit of what you diagnosed, as I outlined already, again cite the important parts of the dialog and the portions I responded to already.  Again, it would not matter and you offer that your guess is educated, I'd say it is misleading, and foolish and is actually naive not to mention completely beyond your ability to determine or prove let along offer how it would help Wakimoto?  The odds are against you, you are as bad as statistics as you are at making sense, offering diagnosis, or being able to determine what is and is not possible.  Are you playing poker now or tossing dice?  Or just taking another stab in the dark?  Guess what?  The customer is always right and I'll say you lost that game of Russian Roulette.  It is not your concern and since you don't seem to care about any of the actual health concerns, why worry about those you can not see or prove otherwise? I could be missing an arm, does that matter at all based on what I've written here?  Nope I guess not.

Steve says -- "BTW, care to share what other reports you have filed on here? I have found this and the Austin one pretty interesting. "

Why, would you read them?  Since you already offered that you'd have to toss them out since I am what was it?  Mentally Ill, right I forgot that. But this is your "Well Educated Guess" and according to you not something you could be sure about, but something that possibly a toss of the dice would lead you to think you were right about.  Kind of like winning the Lottery, eh?  Why not use a Ouja Board or some cosmic tin foil hat to come to your "Diagnosis" or "Guess" oh excuse me "Well Educated Guess", yes that is it?

Actually Steve you bet on a loser, and that loser is you.  You can't offer anything here and just waste time and space that others might benefit from and you keep tripping over the fact you did and did not claim I was suffering from some form of obscure, impossible to prove, and otherwise invisible to you and all others "Defect" that would not be proven by my "Writing Style", your expertise on nothing, and the fact I make more sense than you ever did or will, and the fact I will talk circles around you, Wakimoto, and Robert any day of the week.  You can't even decide that it is possible for a cat to piss on a carpet and why you'd not want to live with it or not expect those who made the mess to clean it up before you had to.  But then again you say one thing, don't say it another way, claim you never suggested that, but then go back and do the same thing a different way and then claim you did not do it but now it is ok since it was a guess, really it seems like you just want to chase your tail all over.  It is not enough to chase Wakimoto's tail you need to trap yourself in his lies and yours?  Again, why bother.  You keep defending points you were wrong about, or had no need to know, and then you go back and repeat them and claim they mean something or contribute to this, they don't.  What I do is up to me, of course I won't want to do business with Wakimoto, this is the point, recall that.  And I'd say you don't either.  Come on dude, surely you've seen a carpet before that had to be cleaned?  Why trip on that, you seem a flake for not making a huge stink out of the drip pans on the stove, forget the asbestos, lamps not working, and other nonsense, those are of no merit?  Your want to miss the point makes you look like you just want to miss the point.  Good luck with the crap shoot, I think you have a paranoid God complex that allows you to retaliate from afar on behalf of people you don't know against people you don't know and never met.  Maybe see a doctor and get some help with it, soon.  Before someone gets hurt.

The only other one I know of is where you had to pay a year's worth of rent in Austin (and yes, I can spot your writing style a mile away). 

Anyway, on to your points. You did not seem to imply that you were getting out of your current apartment in your current post. Since you are, cool. And I never said you have no right to complain (though you should forward your complaint to your landlord so he can defend himself). I think this is the biggest misunderstanding you have of what I was trying to say.

As far as your description of the place, it definitely seems like an exaggeration (come on, dude, feces/urine in the closet)? 

 And I have made no "medical diagnosis" of you; I am simply making a well-educated guess based on your writings. Could be right, could be wrong, but I'm playing the right odds here.

BTW, care to share what other reports you have filed on here? I have found this and the Austin one pretty interesting.  

I missed that one attempt Steve made at diagnosis of Schizophrenia that points out he does not know what he is talking about.  He offers I might have a "Touch of it" as he puts it based on his assumption of paranoid responses.  Paranoid responses or the determination thereof can not be made by Steve, and nobody can conclude that any person has no basis for being afraid or concerned about anything.  Steve sure as heck can't make that claim from where he sits but it gets better.  The fact he'd attempt to do this is enough to make him the crook he is, but get this, people are either Schizophrenic or they are not, there is NO middle ground and this is one of the few and I mean very few psychiatric disorders that have a known physical basis and can be PROVEN by concrete diagnostics.  There is a structural feature and with that physical assessment is possible, and having that diagnosis is meaningless towards being used to claim none of what happened here is not possible.  Bad things can be done to mentally ill people, one does NOT preclude the other, there is no possible causal relation that allows one to deny the other, both are possible and likely supportive if nothing else.  Using that claim at all would be the first torpedo below Steve and Wakimoto's waterline, in that, is this why you did this to him or others? You thought they were nuts?  It might be good as motive for the crimes.

With that, Steve is full of crap with his offer of me even being pissy.  Also a poor choice of terms I will point out since part of my concern and attempt to resolve them as an adult, despite people like Steve and Wakimoto, is just that. I had to clean up someone else's piss since Wakimoto was too derelict to clean the unit before I came there to live.  So I think Steve's want to be coy makes him look like a dirtbag at this point and I hope he enjoys living in someone else's piss and crap, since this is part of what this is about.  Doing one's job, offering a clean and usable abode, and not expecting me to make it all work by fixing it for you AND then me being blamed for doing so as Wakimoto did and does.  All that was outlined already, you now claim it was too much to read?  Too bad.  

I think pissing on my head as Steve and Wakimoto do gives me the right to be upset and less than pleasant in response.  When someone mistreats you and then makes a bunch of bogus claims and uses medical nonsense towards that end while ruining your health among other things, do you expect your response would be to be pleased about it?  Makes no sense to me, you are a fool kind sir.  And your nonsense has a similar flavor to it, I'd call it a patina of crap you hope to sugar coat this all with.  You are a crook just as I've stated before, you protect felons with hogwash, and that makes you just as bad as them.  Wakimoto is a felon and so are you for protecting him, your claims make you look as dirty as he and your offer of medical expertise is a big winner for your credibility AND ethic to boot.  Care to try another approach?  What now?  You are an expert in pest control and materials science and claim that termites, poison used to kill them and asbestos are in fact good for us?  Right on!

You took the bait Steve and ran with it, you had enough rope to hang yourself, now it is time to reel you in.  Attempting to harm people and then having folks arrive right away to cite paranoid responses and offer obviously flawed medical diagnosis, use broad based attempts to discredit those people, and then rely on vague medical symptoms and other dishonest efforts to confuse symptom and problem and cause and effect make you look like a fraud, you are a fraud as well as Wakimoto.  Make no doubt about that.  And the claims you made are obviously not possible for you to even suspect let alone prove and the fact you'd grasp at that straw at all and at this point and in that manner make it seem as though you played right into the predicted and anticipated defense any criminal would use to smear his victim and hope to garner support for making him a victim to begin with.  I'd say shame on you but I won't, someday when someone shoves you down the stairs, I will just show up and say you imagined it while I watch you bleed to death on the landing.  Get the idea now?  If I don't do it, someone else will.  If nothing else, the fact you were rented a slum and nothing was fixed would be enough, the dishonesty and the other nonsense are crimes, as to why and how, the details may or may not matter, I just add more color to them so you can better fill in the blanks.  You just prefer to run away from it all and apply your own doppler spin to the whole mess making it something it is not.  As in you might have a touch of nonsense in your head as well as a flavor of wanting to let someone like Wakimoto get away with what he does.  How much does he pay you?

There is nothing insulting about thinking someone is schizophrenic, any more than thinking they have diabetes. I have had a few schizophrenic friends, and the ones that were happiest were the ones that knew it, because they would temper their suspicions with, "hey, this might be my schizophrenia acting up."

Let me make my pitch as to why I think you may have some kind of condition: of all the posters on here that have what I would consider strange reasoning, you are by FAR the most intelligent and articulate. This is not flattery; take a look at some of the posts on this board and you will see what I mean. The people on here that are even close to your intelligence do not have your extremely accusatory nature. In other words, your strange worldview is NOT due to stupidity. 

The thing is, you KNOW this - your wife poisoning you (multiple times) has had an obvious neurological effect, e.g. you smell strange things sometimes, correct? If she ran over you with a car, would you not get a cast to heal your broken bones, or a wheelchair if necessary? You would certainly not be insulted if someone mentioned that you were paralyzed, or whatever. Well in this case you were the victim of a mental attack, and it only makes sense to make the best use of western medicine to undo at least some of that. The bi1tch of mental injuries, however, is that they can prevent one from getting that treatment. It is sort of like Catch-22: if you are crazy, you don't have to go to war, but not wanting to go to war shows that you aren't crazy!

The closest I ever got to this state is when I used to have bad LSD trips. I couldn't trust anyone; it sucked. All I can say is, think of how you were before your wife tried to murder you, and give different drugs a try until you feel closer to that. 

Other reports who's source you can not identify or that you could not attribute to me directly have no merit in making this one anything other than what it is.  Another report someone has filed, or that I have filed may or may not relate to this one, you'd not know that and could not, and it is more useful to use what you say here to toss you into the looney bin since you seem to show up here just to make wild, wacky, and weird not to mention foolish claims about people and things you could not know about.  You offer the same, tired, lame, and naive approach that you always use and if nothing else, it lacks teeth, and is just that, lame and useless.  Over the course of 80 years of your life do you expect to have no more than ONE problem you'd need to complain about?  That seems unlikely.  Could it not be possible that people who had something drastic done to them would have other things done to them in response to that or in support of those who did it to begin with?  You mention a few other postings, again cite nothing specific or of merit towards your concerns, and you really made no offer of having any real concern did you Steve?  What is your point?  I think you are even good at showing up and wasting tons of virtual ink and not saying anything.  Making a claim and support it somehow would be a good first step.

I bet I could knock your socks off with about a dozen more complaints all related to just one violent thing done to me and the medical mess that went on later.  Could you not believe that?  Again, you are lost living in some other world since this reality is too harsh for you.  You don't get out much do you?  And I'd guess that the farthest you've traveled from the safety of your home is the local gas station.  I think your life experiences and lack thereof make you a poor choice of people who'd want to attempt to dissect anyone else's mess and add anything of value to it.  In other words, your parochial and naive view of what does and does not happen in the real world would imply that you live in a shell and have not been around the world as many times as I have.  If all of this bothers you, maybe you need to do something else, since it seems you find it an outrage that I'd come here to share my experiences with others.  Like I tell all such people, if the real world is too much, change the channel and go back to cartoons.

At this point Steve, why choose just those reports you mentioned, why not assume ALL of the reports here were written by me and that as such you need to make fun of all of them AND me in the process? Can you prove that I wrote those, or did not, or can you prove that I did not write all of these reports?  Can you prove that you did not write them yourself and as such are just here complaining about you?  Do you personally know me, know what reports I wrote when, and where and how and how I signed them?  Do you know all the other people here, what reports they wrote, and how they signed them?  My guess?  Is no, you don't, care to comment on that also?

Steve, fair enough, your point is well taken and of course you realize just showing up and right off the bat making mental health claims makes it seem you suggest the claim "What, are you nuts?"  and to be fair, is a detractor from getting the truth out there.  I don't mind discussing what was done since it is important.

Steve quoted me --

"The deal was offer a place to live, landlord pays the utilities and makes repairs, I have flush toilets, running water, heat, windows, and a roof over my head, with me so far?  So the simple answer you arrive at is why don't I move since the landlord is too lazy and cheap to fix anything?  I'd offer to Steve, why don't you come over and make all the repairs for free?  Moving there just to move out makes about as much sense as your next stupid statement."

Then Steve said -- "Yeah, the simple answer IS to move. Do you have an alternative thing that you can do? You have stated over and over again that they won't do anything no matter how much you complain. What, you think that posting on this site will help somehow? And if you stay just because you think "moving there just to move out" is stupid, well then, enjoy your squalor. If I were in your position I would cut my losses, get out of this allegedly filthy place, and have a better life. You, on the other hand, will live in this place because you refuse to help yourself and get the heck out. "


Right but we need to get to that point, I already said that, I had to go there, experience it, work with the landlord and find out he does not comply and does not perform and then we get to where I am at now.  I can't just make these claims without actually living there, so you say just leave and don't report him to others so he can do it to you?  Really, you don't make sense to me, you understand why we are here at the RipOff report?  As in you buy a new car, it is a lemon, and I say, just don't purchase that car, or walk away from it and cut your losses, why bother me with it?  Is that what you suggest?  Are you paranoid and delusional Steve?  I just have to ask now since your dialog lacks logic and your judgment seems flawed.  I have a concern, I am expressing it here, I've encountered a dishonest person, and inform others now about it.  The question is how long do I allow it to go on and when do I move and what is the cost, of course it seems when your apartment gets condemned, you are going to move, this is obvious.  That much I know.  What you offer is akin to you are hungry, someone stole your food, why not just eat to fix it is your advice?

Then Steve said -- "And no need to get pissy because I asked if you have been diagnosed with schizophrenia. Either you have or you haven't. The reason why I suspect you do have at least a touch of it is the paranoia in some of your statements, where you imply that the landlord is out to intentionally do you harm. But I never claimed you had it, I just asked if any medical professional had made that diagnosis. Yes or no answer."

I am upset, you made an inaccurate claim that would imply I must be nuts, since there is not medical efficacy to your want to diagnose anything, it is not possible, it is just a shot from the hip that you made.  It is also wrong.  The landlord is doing just that, lording over people, using influence to harm them, basically to keep them trapped in a bad situation and pressing them to think they deserve it so he can profit from it. He is a bully, a thief, a prison guard, and a con man, and con men invent reasons to make their marks feel good about getting ripped off.  You knew that didn't you?  You can not assume I am paranoid about anything based on any of this and I simply said that the actions of the landlord and his employees were designed to play upon my vanities in some not so appropriate ways and short of wearing a Tshirt that says "I am going to murder Bobby" when I visit bobby as he sits in his dangerous, falling apart, not getting fixed apartment full of termites, cockroaches, asbestos, broken glass, rusty fixtures, and the like waving knives in his face and all of that, you get to believe that you might be harmed and likely just need to go elsewhere as you said.  The fact it is being done is of value to know.  In other words the landlord is playing a game on people, putting them down, and ripping them off.  He COULD fix the place and make it nice for about $300/unit, but he won't even spend $100 to go part way there.  That tells me along with the fact he won't let me make it better for me and him, that he just wants to make sure I have to live with the crud he shoves on me.  It is not right.  Nothing paranoid in calling people on their efforts to rub your nose in something, that is what is being done.  He uses all manner of clever dialog, and other ploys to do all that,  basically threaten someone in his coy way without saying anything.  That is part of being a "Wiseguy" as he'd think.  You know that game I am sure.  

Then Steve said --"And while I have a hard time believing the place is as bad as you describe (your descriptions are a bit over the top), let's say it is. I am not "blaming the victim," as you put it. I am suggesting that you stop being a victim, and get out. I've lived in some crappy places in my day, but I saved up a few bucks, and got out. Oh well. Some people just love being miserable I guess. "

Steve, what is over the top in what I describe?  To be fair, if you want to make a claim or refute a point, mention it. You just want to toss vague and inaccurate analysis that disputes claims you are not willing to mention specifically so I may support them or your opinion and then you hide behind a mental health defense that you'd hope to use to discredit anything I said, does that sound right?  And by "Over the top", does that imply all my claims here are just too impossible to fathom, given as you said "I've lived in some crappy places in my day" but for some reason this "Crappy place" can't possibly exist because I said it was crappy?  You need to do better than that Steve.  I'll gladly talk to you, you just need to say something that someone can respond to.  Other than that, you just tripped on your own Sperry Topsider on that one, making more vague shots in the dark and hoping when I do fall down those broken stairs, they don't come looking for you to claim I must have been nuts for allowing you to trip me.  

And who said I was not moving, that is an obvious approach to ending a relationship with an abusive person?  I can offer you obvious advice also, if you don't understand something, why not go see a psychiatrist and have them explain it to you? It is all about causing people intentional harm in order to profit. Slumlords do that and use lots of methods towards that fraud, you can't see that?  Certainly someone with your expertise in the medical and mental health fields combined with your expertise in law enforcement will make all of that apparent to you, in that causing harm to people you are stealing from makes it easier to get away with and have others blame the victim.

You really do offer an insane defense, since moving costs money, it is in general an additional expense that adds to the financial harm caused to people who get mistreated like this, in that how would I save any money by getting ripped off.  Keep in mind, this is a quizz, what is the name of this website again?  That is a hint, a clue, and possibly a trap for you....can you solve the riddle Steve?

I don't love being miserable at all, and I don't need to play a victim, I am one.  You need to allow people to be victims so you can have something to talk about on the RipOff Report since some of us did get ripped off.  That way you can know about it and learn from other's pain and not do business with those causing the harm AND you can learn how they are doing it so you can catch others who MIGHT use the SAME APPROACH!??!??!  Golly, any other questions "Steve"?

But here is an offer for Steve, why not make your suggestions to the sponsors and people who run this site, include Ralph Nader in that and CC law enforcement with your suggestions.  When someone gets harmed by crime, have them not say anything about it, don't do anything for them, just claim they are nuts, and tell them to shut up about it, and then instruct them to move. This is your approach is it not?  Do you see a problem with that solution?  I do.  I think Ralph Nader does also......any more guesses Steve?


Steve, you don't know any of the other reports I filed since they are all done without using my real name.  None of what you offer could be used to refute anything that did or did not happen to me or anyone else, since you have no knowledge of who I am or anything else about me for that matter.  I have many reports filed all over the place and you don't know which are mine or how many or about who or where they are. Consider that.  You again do you a disservice by making claims and personal attacks against people you don't know, it makes you look like a fool, and a shill.  In keeping with your mental health claims, you are right, you are paranoid and delusional, likely having delusions of grandeur along with the notion you can read people's minds, know the life story and identity of anonymous authors who post content thousands of miles distant from you, and you lack good judgment when people iterate life experiences that you can validate from your own personal experience, for some reason when it happens to them it seems odd, foreign, impossible, and unlikely and then for some reason must mean they are insane.  Next you will use the fact that someone is upset about upsetting things as proof of insanity.  

Best of luck with all of that.  When something bad happens to you, don't come to me for help, I won't care to hear it.  And if you are so sure of yourself, then read ALL the reports I filed since you know me and all of them, and invest HEAVILY in those people and those businesses, put your money where my mouth is in other words.  What do you say to that?  Since I am clearly wrong, I must be insane, and I have nothing better to do than invent all of this, I must be wrong in all of it, you must be right, and ALL those people must be honest people to do business with.  I might have made some inaccurate assumptions along the way, I bet I am right about most all of what I said, some would be conjecture certainly as to why it was being done, but that would not be enough to claim I am wrong about ALL of it.  Your want to do that, is obviously dishonest and your approach makes you look just as dishonest for doing so.  Next you can cite flawed statistics that indicate that all violent and financial crime has been eradicated in this country and we are mopping up the last two slumlords in the USA and this person is not one of them, care to suggest that also?  I bet you are going to find doing business here in the US is like a treasure hunt, the lead, rocks, dirt, and dross are a dime a dozen, and the silver, gold, platinum, and rhodium are going to be scarce as hen's teeth.  When you find that one person worth doing business with, you have made a discovery, all the rest are just that, all the rest, and not worth your time.  You disagree with that also?  Dishonesty, just like yours, seems to be the norm in this country, why make it normal?  You love getting ripped off don't you? And you love living with termites and the poison used to kill them of course.  And the asbestos fixes all of that for you?  How so?

Oh and having more than one bad experience does NOT preclude this one being possible or my outline of it here as being accurate. It would in fact make it MORE likely it would be done in order to take advantage of other harm and then have people like you show up to defend it as being impossible and then use the conspiracy word to toss more diagnosis on the problem with the claim that bad things don't happen to people intentionally.  I think your world is far distant from the real world by what you suggest here Steve.  People who attack other people allow others to cover for them, people profit from such things as does this landlord who'd want to think he can take advantage of people and use you ignorance to do so.  At some point people smarter than you will use what you believe in and display here against you, count on that.  What goes around does come around.     But then again you know you are being dishonest, just like this landlord, now you just likely think you are being funny, or that you are clever.  By Steve, I don't need you and nobody here cares what you think.  Anyone with any sense will discount all you say.  So will I, but I will use you to prove my point further.  Thanks.

Enjoy your smoothie, I don't know Rita, and now you are babbling again Steve, time to take your pill and rest, I think this has been too much for you.  Maybe visit mommy and she will make it all better for you, ok?  Yuk Yuk Yuk Yuk Yuk!

I guess you missed this guy's other reports.  He has reports written on Motels in Florida and Arizona.  He also has one on an apartment in Texas, blaming them for requesting money in advance because of his bad credit after his wife tried to murder him.

Honestly, this guy may end up being good competition for Rita, or the Smoothie Guy in Florida.

"The deal was offer a place to live, landlord pays the utilities and makes repairs, I have flush toilets, running water, heat, windows, and a roof over my head, with me so far?  So the simple answer you arrive at is why don't I move since the landlord is too lazy and cheap to fix anything?  I'd offer to Steve, why don't you come over and make all the repairs for free?  Moving there just to move out makes about as much sense as your next stupid statement."

Yeah, the simple answer IS to move. Do you have an alternative thing that you can do? You have stated over and over again that they won't do anything no matter how much you complain. What, you think that posting on this site will help somehow? And if you stay just because you think "moving there just to move out" is stupid, well then, enjoy your squalor. If I were in your position I would cut my losses, get out of this allegedly filthy place, and have a better life. You, on the other hand, will live in this place because you refuse to help yourself and get the heck out. 

And no need to get pissy because I asked if you have been diagnosed with schizophrenia. Either you have or you haven't. The reason why I suspect you do have at least a touch of it is the paranoia in some of your statements, where you imply that the landlord is out to intentionally do you harm. But I never claimed you had it, I just asked if any medical professional had made that diagnosis. Yes or no answer.

And while I have a hard time believing the place is as bad as you describe (your descriptions are a bit over the top), let's say it is. I am not "blaming the victim," as you put it. I am suggesting that you stop being a victim, and get out. I've lived in some crappy places in my day, but I saved up a few bucks, and got out. 

Oh well. Some people just love being miserable I guess. 

Why would it seem strange I'd be living there?  Your comments make little sense, are you a friend of the landlord or something?  He rents or claims to rent apartments, what in actually renting one from Wakimoto would make the resident strange for living there just because the landlord does not repair anything?  Do you blame all the victims or just those you prefer to let get taken advantage of using your mental health defense? 

The units are not accurately portrayed on the internet, they are not maintained, there are many concerns that are not getting fixed, and for the most part you need to go there to live to find all of that out.  So I'd say it makes perfect sense that someone who actually lived there would locate and discuss those concerns without having people toss mud on them in the form of mental health slams against their character as you would offer here.  I am a little shocked that the website allows you to just show up and start offering personal attacks against people who publish concerns here, it would seem to be contrary to their policy of NOT making personal attacks against posters.  Any reason you'd care to offer in defense of your position of inappropriate suggestions about people you don't know and have no direct experience with?  That being you don't know me and I could just as easily call you AND Jimmy Wakimoto liars and shills and skip offering you a mental health defense, after all you'd just be criminals and not sickos as you'd hope. Get the idea now?

Why don't I move?  Who is going to pay for that and would that not defeat the purpose of renting me an apartment to begin with?  The deal was offer a place to live, landlord pays the utilities and makes repairs, I have flush toilets, running water, heat, windows, and a roof over my head, with me so far?  So the simple answer you arrive at is why don't I move since the landlord is too lazy and cheap to fix anything?  I'd offer to Steve, why don't you come over and make all the repairs for free?  Moving there just to move out makes about as much sense as your next stupid statement.  That being:

Have I ever been diagnosed with Schizophrenia?  So for that, why would you even ask that simply because someone encounters a slumlord?  Do all people who encounter concerns and get ripped off meet with your initial litmus test of Schizophrenia by default?  You must have some reason to arrive at your "Diagnostic Claim" right off since all that I wrote must point that out to you?  To that "Schizophrenia is a complex mental disorder that makes it difficult to: Tell the difference between real and unreal experiences; Think logically; Have normal emotional responses, Behave normally in social situations. "

So based on I think some fairly logical explain of the concepts here, that being I was misled, landlord failed to perform, you must not have a clue as to what you are talking about, and what difference or relevance does your question have to any of this?  You could not prove any of such claims of Schizophrenia anyway, I can prove all of mine, you don't know who I am, and your offer of discussion is to be fair, useless and lame.  Any other questions "Steve" or are you just another weirdo with an opinion that would suggest any of that was done to me intentionally since you thought I deserved it, being Schizophrenic and likely worth your disdain?  Don't feel a need to respond, you don't add much other than make you look like a fool.

Perhaps if you had diagnosed me by proxy and over the internet as having brain damage following a stroke you could then use that to rent me a virtual apartment for lots of money and provide no actual product at all and then come here to the RipOff website to complain how I am complaining about it?  Might make you the genius and not me.  Or it might make you something else.

Or why don't you move there and then hope to call everyone else insane?  Sounds like a better idea and then you can attempt to call me a name to my face, see how far that gets you, want to try that?

Seems strange that you are staying there. BTW, have you ever been diagnosed with schizophrenia?