Jonathan Josey America's Most Crooked Cop Philadelphia Pennsylvania
Philadelphia police officer Jonathan Josey was CAUGHT ON VIDEO feloniously assaulting and falsely arresting an innocent, petite female, Aida Guzman. Google the viral video to watch this shocking violence. Josey is the recipient of dozens of prior, covered up, formal and informal citizen complaints for robbery, false arrest, aggravated assault, and even murder (he fatally shot an unarmed man in the back.) Josey faced a sham prosecution for the Guzman assault.
An extremely weak case, replete with gross undercharging, was presented to a corrupt judge, Patrick Dugan. As expected, Dugan acquitted Josey despite the video evidence definitively proving his guilt! Dugan's wife, Nancy Farrell Dugan, is a Philadelphia police officer, a blatant conflict of interest. After Josey's not guilty verdict was announced, hundreds of cops in the courtroom cheered, a reaction that screams volumes about the EXTREME contempt that Philadelphia police officers have for their taxpayer victims who ironically pay them for PROTECTION!
Taxpayers paid victim Guzman $75,000 to settle her lawsuit against Josey. Criminal charges against her were dropped. By default of the police labor agreement, Josey will probably be rehired with full back pay. In other words, his "punishment" for brutally assaulting an innocent woman will ultimately be a paid, months-long vacation. Josey has many other victims, including James Lewis and his two teenage sons. Josey and four other Philadelphia cops robbed and violently assaulted them, then falsely arrested them to cover it up.
Even Philadelphia's sleazy, inept, crooked prosecutors decided to refrain from pursuing this bogus case, thusly dropping all charges. The Lewises are now suing the officers involved. Amnesty International recently suggested that Philadelphia is home to the world's most crooked police force. With cops like Jonathan Josey having carte blanche to rob, frame, assault, and kill, is that characterization really a surprise?
2 Updates & Rebuttals
realclient
Pennsylvania,#1 General Comment is LAUGHABLE!
#3Author of original report
Mon, June 24, 2013
I suggest that "Tyg" refrain from posting comments when he does not know what he is talking about, such as his post on this page. "Tyg" is a brainwashed, sub-literate nutcase who illogically rationalizes all police crimes. In his deluded, low intelligence mind, criminal cops can do no wrong, yet their obviously law-abiding victims can do no right - even when cops are caught on video perpetrating violent felonies! Jonathan Josey was fired from the Philadelphia Police Department because his felonious assault of Aida Guzman was caught on a video that has since gone viral (it has over three million views on all uploads.)
Commissioner Charles Ramsey has vowed that Josey will never be rehired. Taxpayers paid Guzman $75,000 to settle her lawsuit against Josey. "Tyg" is an uninformed kook who has not a clue about Philadelphia's en mass police-crime problem. Josey himself is the recipient of dozens of prior citizen complaints for robbery, false arrest, aggravated perjury, assault, and even murder (he fatally shot an unarmed man in the back!)
Nonetheless, his fellow corrupt officers covered up all of his crimes until indisputable video proof of his latest felony proved too difficult to conceal. Over 400 Philadelphia police officers have been convicted of crimes just since 1980, which extrapolates to a staggering five-percent career conviction rate. Even worse, (in effect) over 90% of all criminal Philadelphia police officers are immune from being fired, much less arrested, according to a 2004 independent prosecutor's study. Extrapolating, the majority of Philadelphia police officers are criminals. Jonathan Josey's offenses are merely the tip of the police-crime iceberg.
Tyg
Pahrump,Nevada,
You are mistaken.
#3General Comment
Thu, June 20, 2013
I wont say much about your rant except that if this officer WAS that bad he wouldnt be on the force. There are PLENTY of willing police officers who would love to have their job. If he is still working then he was found innocent. You cannot judge a persons motives nor actions from a small video clip. ANYONE who watches it without having been there to witness it from start to finish is simply making a opinion from partial evidence.
Where you are incorrect is that is it NOT a conflict of interest for a couple to both work for the police. As long as they are not partnered up in a patrol car and dont have the same immediate supervisor, then they can both work for the police dept. As they have to work sometimes as much as 12 hr days, their only REAL ops are the other officers as they see them more then they get to see their own families. Please, before you post again tighten the aluminum foil hat and then get your facts straight.
As this is a public forum, what you have done is defamation of character and that is something you can be sued for in civil court. So be careful.