Complaint Review: Kathy Roberts - Kathy's Classy K-9's

Mr. Cox is a disgrace to the human race. We have a Sgt in the Marine Corps who has responded to this report, and now Mr. Cox feels the need to verbally bash this Marine. This Sgt has served our country and has fought not once but TWICE in Iraq, while protecting "our" freedom. This brave Marine is serving his country, protecting and risking his life for all of us, so we can enjoy our freedom, this includes Mr. Cox, and this is the thanks he gets?!

I find Mr. Cox's personal attack on this U.S. Marine disgraceful and disgusting. Mr. Cox is a vulgar, disgusting being PERIOD!

To our service men and women there is not enough thanks for what you all are doing for us. God Bless you all, and keep you safe.

Bob Cox just doesn't know when to stop with his lies. He sold me Calla with a contract stating no defects and he sold her to me as a breeding female. Calla doesn't have a umbilical hernia and never did. We don't know what Marco Abea Z Mirkova Chovu has or had. But we do know that per Mr. Cox he's a "$30,000" dog that failed his BH, is that to a lie Bob?

Anyone who is reading this please stop, and copy and paste Marco's full name in an internet search and you will see the truth. My customers did just that, and asked me why he failed. Mr.Cox doesn't have a reason why Marco failed or why he was absent at the other trials. Perhaps that is why on Mr. Cox's website he just identifies "Marco Abea Z Mirkova Chovu" as "Marco" if anyone started researching they would find this info out about Marco.

Whatever comes out of Bob Cox's mouth I wouldn't believe period. I have emails from a lady who bought a pup out of Marco that was bred to one of his other females that he still has and is still breeding and the pup had red mange, which is a hereditary defect. The poor lady had to wait over a year and a half to get another pup from him as a replacement. She described her experience with Mr. Cox as horrible and she refers to him as a "snake".

Mr Cox called the AKC on 9/27/06 and stated he was not signing off as sire's owner on the litter application as he lied to the AKC and used for an excuse to not sign by saying that the dam's ears were bad. AKC contacted me, I provided AKC with proof that Calla's ears were perfect and provided them a picture. AKC wouldn't accept that as reason to not sign off. AKC informed me that all they wanted was his signature. Mr. Cox fought AKC for over a month by refusing to sign those papers.

Here is an email below FROM AKC I received on September 29, 2006 10:14 A.M. (my complaint was sent to AKC on 9/02/06)

Ms. R.,

This email is to follow up with the two emails I received and also the information you faxed to our office on Thursday, September 28, 2006.

The litter registration application remains on hold as we have not received a reply from Mr. Cox at this time. Should we require any additional information, we will contact you. Otherwise, you will be notified of our findings at the conclusion of our inquiry.

We appreciate your understanding and patience during this time.

Case Management Department

If Mr. Cox signed those papers at his own free will as he wants YOU to believe WHY on earth would AKC send me such an email?

Bob Cox is it or is it not true that my attorney sent you a letter requesting your signature on that AKC litter application? Mr. Cox called my attorney on 7/27/06 and told him he was NOT signing the litter application.

Mr. Cox wants to portray that he voluntarly signed the litter application. As he portrayed to the Judge that is the only reason why he won in court was to LIE that is what he's all about deception and lies, lies, lies. I have SEVERAL emails from AKC and will present in court as proof that it took AKC's enforcement for him to sign.

I wasn't allowed to market these puppies while they were in Calla's belly because of his bull s*** he put me through. He was begging to buy her while she was pregnant by posting on the pedigreedatabase, which I will present in court or is that all lies to Bob?

He is such a pathetic disturbed loser of a person that once the deputy sheriff made contact with Mr. Cox at his home, to have him to cease his harassing phone calls, that's when Mr. Cox filed his bogus small claims suit against me the very next day.

AFTER Mr. Cox was enforced to sign the AKC litter application, and AFTER he signed the litter application, Bob Cox tried to stop the AKC process (see below).

October 17, 2006 8:10 A.M.
Hi K.;
The case is still under review. We received new information on the case and all the information is reviewed in the order it arrives. All you can do is wait.

Finally I submitted a 12 page fax to the AKC case management dept., and submitted a copy of the suit he filed against me. Immediately upon receipt of my fax, the case management called me on 10/18/06 and stated that they reviewed the case, and said they would process the litter application. On October 25, 2006 when the pups were 8 wks old I received the AKC papers.

Mr. Cox didn't do anything on his free will and certainly nothing for me. It was me that had to file a complaint against him with AKC in order for ME to obtain those papers.
He will find out very soon.

I have all 47 pages printed out from the pedigreedatabase back in August when he begged to buy Calla back from me. He made statements over and over that Kathy has everything to gain, she has Calla. On the database he refused to sign the AKC litter application, and its also on tape. So we all know who is lying here, and it is indeed Bob Cox.

As far as the Blitz dog yes he indeed sold me the dog. He will find out all about that too very soon.

As far as Hexe is concerned when I sold Calla's litter I had my money to pay the balance of $200 that was owed, I submitted a letter to his son on 10/25/06 stating that I would pay the balance off of $200 once the AKC papers were signed over and sent to me via certified mail for his protection. After the bad dealings I had with COX I was not going to send my $200 and have COX come up with ANOTHER bull s*** story that the papers were lost etc., etc., So the day he receives the letter which was sent on 10/25/06 and received on 10/27/06 he had his son file a small claims suit against me for $200. on the day he rec'd the letter. How sad Mr. Cox is. This was Mr. Cox's doings not his son's. He already had $500 paid towards the dog, so what would he be out by sending me the papers first? The answer absolutely nothing. Certainly he could have filed suit if I didn't send the certified check for $200 as I stated in the letter. All I wanted was my AKC papers. I knew if I sent them first I would not have rec'd them. His son has been paid in full.

This is just a warning to everyone thinking about using Mr. Cox's stud dog or buying a puppy from him, ask for a health report from his breeding stock, if you buy a pup request a health certificate from his vet, that's a state law requirement. He sold me three dogs without one health certificate, NO vaccinations NOTHING! Please be sure to get everything in writing. He is nothing but a con artist and peddles these dogs.

Calla doesn't have any defects which is documented by a vet. As I said I don't know about "Marco" Mr. Cox lied to me about everything so I have no reason to believe anything he has to say.

Furthermore, in regards to Calla she didn't have the opportunity to be bred to a QUALITY German Shepherd, she will get that opportunity next year. We will breed her next breeding with our male who has NO health problems and has produced gorgeous puppies with absolutely no defects whatsoever. Calla has a clean bill of health does Marco?

I believe the defects came from his stud dog Marco, not Calla. Mr. Cox is running down the pups that were sired by his $30,000 stud dog. Calla doesn't have the defects, and Mr. Cox never provided me once any health info on Marco. In fact he will breed any female to his $30,000 stud without requesting a smear before breeding, to rule out brucellosis. How ethical is that?? That's really ethical isn't it? A dog that can't pass his BH is valued at $30,000? He says he sells these pups for $2500 each out of this stud. He says Marco isn't for sale who would want that dog? Surely not me. I personally would never, ever, ever breed any of my dogs to his Marco! When Mr. Cox said he paid over $30,000 for his "Marco" the Judge rolled his eyes and people were laughing!

Now I know why Mr. Cox said on tape on 7/27/06 "you thought those puppies were going to be registerable?" "You bred to Marco for pets, for pets". Yes indeed in Mr. Cox's own admission that is what Marco produces PET puppies!

BUYER BEWARE OF COX!

I will just make a short response to each of her LIES!!!!

1. I have never told what I paid for Marco!
I said in court that he was valued at $30,000.
He is not for sale at any price so it doesn't matter!!!!!!!!!!

2. Kathy said her customers ask her for proof of MARCO'S credentials,and she never ask me or had them call. What a shame!!

3.Her proof is to tell you to go back and look at the last lies she wrote,and she thinks that is proof. I prove in court and she thinks people will believe her just because.

4.As far as BLITZ I will post that after I prove it in court.

5.As for AKC having to force me to sign,another kathy roberts LIE. I have a thankyou letter from AKC for my prompt attention in regestering of her litter. I also showed this to the JUDGE in court.

6.She had 5 pups that SHE said had to have surgery for umbilical hernias,and the only male having just one t******e, 'unilaterally cryptorchid', and she can't wait until CALLA can be bred again, Is she just a Unethical breeder or is she really this ignorant, what a ignorant pathetic woman.

MARCO has sired 47 litters in EUROPE and several in the U.S.A.and no reports of any birth defects
with any of his pups until CALLA!

I sold her CALLA not as a proven producer ,but she is now proven and should be spayed. She stated that the VET gave CALLA a clean bill of health. NOW you tell me "WOULD A ETHICAL BREEDER BREED A PROVEN DAM LIKE CALLA?" I WOULDN"T !!!

7. She said I wanted to buy CALLA back,wrong.
She had cut me down before and I said I would give her her money back for CALLA IF SHE THOUGHT
I CHEATED HER.

8.I didn't try to buy her back at the court house.
She said that she had no money, no job, and didn't own anything,and had no way to pay the judgments that the judge entered against her.
I told her that I would take Calla back to satisfy the judgment against her. hoping I could have her spayed so she doesn't do this to anymore puppies!!!!!!!!!!!!

9.She complains because she says she could have gotten more for these sick pups if she had got her papers quicker. SAD

10.This will be my last response on here because of her ,he said, she said ways,except I will make one more notice when the court rules on BLITZ!!!!

11.She did pay the judgment against her to my son.
A shame he had to have her forced to pay $200
by the court!!!

Bob

I am so happy you got a gsd from Kathy Roberts.
It is great that you are happy with it.
The problem is that your inside information is
just B.S. that you were told by this woman with serious mental problems.

By the way a COWARD is someone who does not have enough BALLS to say it in person and has to say it from many many miles away. You must be one bad a*s soldier. HA HA. You think you know a lot about her and her business,and you only bought a dog from her ,yea right!

I have never sold a dog with a hernia,unlike Kathy Roberts!!!

Everthing I said has been proven in court. And Kathys B.S.???????

She just sold 5 pups with hernias!!!!!

Bob

I am so happy you got a gsd from Kathy Roberts.
It is great that you are happy with it.
The problem is that your inside information is
just B.S. that you were told by this woman with serious mental problems.

By the way a COWARD is someone who does not have enough BALLS to say it in person and has to say it from many many miles away. You must be one bad a*s soldier. HA HA. You think you know a lot about her and her business,and you only bought a dog from her ,yea right!

I have never sold a dog with a hernia,unlike Kathy Roberts!!!

Everthing I said has been proven in court. And Kathys B.S.???????

She just sold 5 pups with hernias!!!!!

Bob

I am so happy you got a gsd from Kathy Roberts.
It is great that you are happy with it.
The problem is that your inside information is
just B.S. that you were told by this woman with serious mental problems.

By the way a COWARD is someone who does not have enough BALLS to say it in person and has to say it from many many miles away. You must be one bad a*s soldier. HA HA. You think you know a lot about her and her business,and you only bought a dog from her ,yea right!

I have never sold a dog with a hernia,unlike Kathy Roberts!!!

Everthing I said has been proven in court. And Kathys B.S.???????

She just sold 5 pups with hernias!!!!!

Bob

I am so happy you got a gsd from Kathy Roberts.
It is great that you are happy with it.
The problem is that your inside information is
just B.S. that you were told by this woman with serious mental problems.

By the way a COWARD is someone who does not have enough BALLS to say it in person and has to say it from many many miles away. You must be one bad a*s soldier. HA HA. You think you know a lot about her and her business,and you only bought a dog from her ,yea right!

I have never sold a dog with a hernia,unlike Kathy Roberts!!!

Everthing I said has been proven in court. And Kathys B.S.???????

She just sold 5 pups with hernias!!!!!

Bob

Ladies and gentlemen my name is Sgt Axxxx Pxxxx, I am a 7 years veteran of the United States Marine Corps. I happen to have inside information concerning this problem. I purchased a male german shepard from Ms. Roberts about a year and a half ago. And I can tell you without a shadow of a doubt, that he is by far the greatest quality of animal it has ever been my privilage to own. Ms. Roberts has always bred the dogs she has owned and she has been highly regarded by everyone that has purchased a dog from her.

Mr. Cox on the other hand has had several complaints proir to this. The problem with Mr. Cox is that he has inferior dogs with hernias and finds unsuppecting people who want to breed with his dogs. Ms. Roberts lost approximatly $5000 dollars due to the low quality of his dogs. And it took Mr. Cox 4 months to finally sign the AKC papers, only to cover his trail and not anger the AKC. Mr. Cox is a coward and a thief. I have had two tours in Iraq and never have I seen such an evil man. For your own safety please stay away from Mr. Cox and allow the proper authorities to deal with him. Ms. Roberts will be in my prayers and the good lord will take care of the rest. Thank you for your time and Semper Fi.

This is Kathy Roberts, I bought Calla from Bob Cox doing business as Cox German Shepherds, Cox K9's, Vom Shepherdhaus Kennels or whatever he decides to call himself this week. After I bought Calla from Bob Cox in April of 2006 he wanted a pup so bad from her that he wanted to breed her to his stud dog, Marco Abea Z Mirkova Chovu the mating took place on June 30, 2006. He would get pick of the litter male vs his $750 stud fee. At that time he stated that he paid over $20,000 for Marco. (HA) Then yesterday in court he tells the Judge he paid over $30,000 for Marco, another BIG lie! (prove it) Do a google search and put in Marco Abea Z Mirkova Chovu, and the results that you will find is that Marco failed his BH test. You will also see that the handler was his buddy, Aaron. That's a pity that a "$30,000" dog can't pass his BH title. (HA) (HA)

My customers tried to search on line where Marco acquired his VA but they couldn't find his name listed. The biggest mistake I ever made was breeding Calla to his stud. My customers asked me for proof of Marco's credentials. They asked if I seen those trophies and no I haven't. Nor was I provided with any proof that Marco has a VA or anything else for that matter. That was never provided to me by Mr. Cox. Mr. Cox would have to provide me proof that his dog is worth "$30,000" for me to believe that. After Calla was bred to his "$30,000" stud dog, before we left his place, after she was mated to his "$30,000" stud I asked for a contract and he said we don't need that, just go on the AKC website, and fill out the application and send it to me, & I will sign it and send it on. (see rip off reports that were filed months ago in regards to this matter under Bob Cox)

Apprx a week later after Calla was bred to Marco, Bob sold to me Blitz on 7/11/06 a "top notch" stud dog for $3000 with $1000 dwn, and pmts of $200 per month. The dog could not perform, and the dog had a defect (see rip off reports filed under Bob Cox on this site in regards to the dud stud) Mr. Cox guaranteed me the dog to be a breedable stud dog, he was not. He asked me to get a vet report so he would refund my $1000 but he wanted proof as to why this dog was not breedable, I provided him with the vet's documentation as to why the dog could not be used for breeding purposes. Bob Cox is being sued for the money he owes me on Blitz, plus boarding fees, loss of litter, compensation from Calla's litter etc.

I will be consulting with my attorney this week, to file another suit against Mr. Cox for the slander and defamation of character, that Bob Cox is posting about me.

Getting back to Calla and Marco. Because of the dud stud he sold me (Blitz) in a taped conversation on July 27, 2006 when I asked Bob Cox for the signed AKC litter application he replied by stating on tape "you thought those pups were registerable?" "you bred to Marco for pets, for pets." I had to file a complaint against him with AKC on 9/02/06 and AKC enforced his signature on 10/06/06 BUT it was too late I had already discounted the price of the pups as "pets" because after his many months of refusing to sign off on the AKC papers.

I have documentation from my attorney when Mr. Cox called him after Cox rec'd a letter from my attorney dated 7/26/06 and requested that he refund the $1000 on Blitz and sign the litter application that was enclosed. Mr. Cox called my attorney and stated to him that he would not sign off on the AKC litter application. So therefore the pups were discounted and were priced at "pet prices" with NO papers and sold as pet prices. He was to get the male pup from Calla providing that he signed off on the AKC litter application. He forfeited that right when he refused to sign off on the litter application. If it wasn't for my complaint to AKC against him, he would not have signed off. AKC enforced this. He did NOT sign the application for ME, he signed for AKC and himself so he wouldn't lose his AKC privleges.

Calla and Marco's puppies were born 9/01/06. 4 females, 1 male. At 4 wks old I discovered all puppies were born with umbilical hernias, I took them to the vet, and all pups had to have surgery. I also took Calla in since this dog came from Bob Cox and I wanted to be sure she had no prior scars from any prior surgery while Bob Cox owned her. Calla checked out with a clean bill of health. My vet stated that this was a hereditary defect and asked me what I knew about the sire, other than that he was a "$30,000" dog, I knew nothing about his health or if he did or did not have any defects, none were disclosed to me.

When it was time for the pup's 8 wk old health check on 10/25/06 the vet discovered that the male only had one t******e known as 'unilaterally cryptorchid'. The vet documented that the male puppy would not be suitable for breeding purposes. Therefore he was sold as a "pet." Unlike Mr. Cox I am a very honest and ethical breeder, I told all my customers up front of the problems that I had in acquiring the AKC papers because the sire's owner refused to sign the application for ME. I explained that was why they were being sold as pets, I told them all about the hernia's, and of course the male's one t******e.

The male did not have any heart problems, nor did I state that in court. He has the audacity to set behind his 6 pack and computer and type lies about me when he got a $400 dog as a pet and ripped me off by selling the dog for $3000 as a top notch stud. Who's stealing from whom?

Because Mr. Cox pouted and cried like a baby for his puppy that he thought he was entitled to. I talked to the Attorney Generals office and he stated that Mr. Cox was NOT entitled to a pup because of his refusal to sign the AKC litter application. I talked to 2 other attorneys and they stated the same, he was NOT entitled to a pup. I decide to give him the male pup regardless, to make peace and finally be done with this ignorant, ignorant pathetic man. I wanted this being out of my life. I sent him a certified letter on 10/31/06 that allowed him to pick up the pup before 11/06/06 BUT he refused. His emails indicated that he was going to send "someone" to pick up the puppy.

I said HE needed to pick up the pup personally. He wanted his wife to pick up the pup, but she didn't file a suit against me, he did, so he needed to pick up the pup himself. He wanted his cake and eat it too. Because he had the balls to say to my attorney and in a email to me, that if the pup was not "healthy" and if it had any problems that he was going to keep the pup and sue me for it too. Someone please explain his logic to me because I don't understand. As I said in court yesterday how can he refuse a pup that came from HIS own breeding stock? Why on earth would Mr. Cox question the health of this puppy when it came from his "$30,000" stud dog!!!!!

I find it very amusing that Mr. Cox refers to my dog as one cent dogs! HA! The one cent dogs that he is referring to ALL came from him, BOB COX! Is this what $30,000 produces?? Prior to any dealings with this man he is not a man, a man does not call someone a b***h and degrade someone in public, I am appalled at his behavior after all I have tried to do for him and gone out of my way, and this is the thanks I get.

All of my other breeding stock that wasn't owned previously by Bob Cox, is in perfect health, hips OFA good, I have had no problems with pups EVER with hernias or one t******e. The only health problems that ever occured here is when I bought dogs from Bob Cox, and when I bred Calla to Marco. Perhaps I have healthy dogs that produce wonderful offspring because they are not "$30,000" dogs. I can't wait to breed Calla with Dakota and you talk about top notch dogs, this litter will be the best ever!
Dakota puts his $30,000 dog to shame.

Mr. Cox called my home, on 9/30/06 and left a voice message on my machine stating that there were health issues with the litter and that was the reason to why he refused to sign the AKC litter application. He was now calling me AFTER the litter was born to discuss the health issues, this was when the pups were almost 4 wks old, and prior to me discovering the hernia's. So in his own admission he knew there was "something" wrong with this litter. What was he concealing? Calla never had a prior litter, so I have to wonder what was wrong with his stud dog for him to call me and leave such a message??

Prior to that on 9/27/06 he called the AKC and it has been documented that he said the reason why he would not sign off on the litter application was because of the dam's ears. I was shocked by these allegations. This was just another stall tactic to not sign off on the litter application. I gladly provided AKC with a picture of Calla's ears showing no defects. I also provided AKC with his postings from the pedigreedatabase where he asked to buy Calla back and the AKC rep asked if this dog had defects why would he want her back? Good question. I also provided the AKC with a copy of the contract I got on Calla when I bought her from him.

Please keep in mind this dog once belonged to Mr. Cox and he sold this dog to me with a contract stating there were no defects known. So why now bring this to AKC's attention? The fact of the whole entire matter is that Bob Cox is a jealous person who wants Calla back, he has seen what big beautiful pups she has produced with awesome red color. I have a waiting list for her next litter and that just kills Mr. Cox. He is so obsessed with Calla and my website that he had photos taken from my website and printed of all the puppies and brought them to court.

On 12/05/06 after court was over we proceeded to the circuit clerk's office I wanted a copy of the continuance date. Mr. Cox was standing next to me, his son was in a corner by the door, and Bob Cox said did you hear the s**t she said about the defective pups she sold? I said yeah out of your junk dogs, (not meaning Calla) and he said you're a b***h, and I am going to post on my website that you are a b***h with PMS. I said to the circuit clerk, he just called me a b***h and 2 deputies heard him as well, and told him to get out of the office, and said we aren't having this here. As he passed me he said that's what you get for treating me like s**t.

After that we went back into the circuit clerks office as the papers were not ready yet, and he had the audacity to ask me if I would sell him Calla!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can you believe this??????

What is wrong with this sick individual??

I talked to the Illinois Attorney General's office yesterday and it appears that quite sometime ago, they sent a letter to Mr. Cox demanding that he refund my $1000 on Blitz. Mr. Cox stated yesterday under oath, that no such thing occured so I guess the IL Attorney General's office are liars too according to Mr. Cox. When I told the court that the IL Attorney General's office recommended that he pay the money he denied that statement. I am to receive a copy of the letter that was sent to him demanding the $1000 refund. Once received I will present it in court.

Mr. Cox has made numerous harassing telephone calls to my home that resulted in law enforcement going to his home, that occured on 10/08/06 when the Sheriff's office paid him a visit to have him cease in contacting me, after the Sheriff's dept made contact with Mr. Cox the very next day he filed his suit against me for $2500 for his male pup that he thought he was entitled to. He caused me much aggravation and monetary loss by not signing off on that litter application that resulted in a huge loss. He did not sign that application willingly it was enforced because he was afraid he would lose his AKC privleges by not signing. After he signed off he immediately claimed that he was entitled to the pup.

In court once again under oath he lied by stating that AKC has no such policies for signing off on litter applications, if that were true he would have never signed off. B.S. to that. I have documentation from AKC that states otherwise.

I paid his son in full in court yesterday for Hexe.

Its a pity to discover what kind of person that Bob Cox really is. I would be so ashamed of myself if I were Bob to lie so bad, and cause so much trouble and hardship for one person. He should have been an ethical breeder and signed the AKC litter application as he promised to do so instead of refusing, it should have not come to this and I should not have had to filed a complaint against him with AKC in order to obtain my litter application. By refusing to sign the application he put me in a position to discount the prices of the pups as pet prices. All breeders know you have to market your pups after mating, you cannot advertise pups at 8 wks old. He knows this but now wants to be righteous. Remember Bob Cox I will have my day in court with you soon. So don't go bragging about your victory. I would be ashamed of myself for all the evil you have done.

He should have made the $1000 good on Blitz as well he pocketed that money. A simple "sorry" would have sufficed back then when the dog was proved to be defective. If he showed some concern things would not be where they are today, he is just a very money hungry person and he has proved to me he cares nothing about the breed nor his customers.

Mr. Cox stated in court that he was going to have his friend Aaron from Michigan (really Indiana) appear in court with him that is why he asked for the continuance. I am to notify law enforcement if Aaron appears in court. I find it amusing that Mr. Cox referred to Aaron as a one time acquaintance. But prior to the bad dealings we had, he bragged about Aaron with his boat house, and that he's with the law enforcement, and he gives seminars. Ruth stated they go up there all the time and have dinner with Aaron and his girlfriend. In fact Ruth said she teases Bob when the phone rings and she sees that its from Aaron, she says to Bob that your girlfriend is calling. So that to me sounds like more than a one time acquaintance. Only a good friend will testify for his friend, and I sure hope to see Aaron there side by side with his friend Bob in court.

I am forwarding Mr. Cox's ripoff report that he has posted about me, to my attorney for a slander suit. This crap with him must be stopped now. This man has no business breeding dogs or any other animal for that matter. He needs to be stopped and he needs to get a real life. He swore to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth and did everything but.
Get a real life Bob Cox.