Lead Masters Insurance Marketing And Financial Network, Inc., dba Life & Annuity Masters Insurance Marketing (“LAAM”); David Ellis (“David”); and Nancy Ellis (“Nancy”) – Simi Valley, California | Notice: Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Decision: A neutral and independent Arbitrator has determined that the following Report contained one or more false statements of facts. The false statements have been redacted as ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). | ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)).
RIPOFF REPORT VIP ARBITRATION - SUMMARY OF ARBITRATOR’S DECISION
Lead Masters Insurance Marketing And Financial Network, Inc.,
dba Life & Annuity Masters Insurance Marketing;
David Ellis and Nancy Ellis, collectively Complainant
v.
An Honest and Concerned Customer aka: author, Author of Report #1467392
Lead Masters Insurance Marketing And Financial Network, Inc., dba Life & Annuity Masters Insurance Marketing; David Ellis and Nancy Ellis, (the “Complainant”) through Ripoff Report’s VIP Arbitration Program has challenged the truthfulness of certain specific statements (each, a “Statement”) posted by An Honest and Concerned Customer aka: author (the “Author”) on the Ripoff Report website at www.ripoffreport.com at Ripoff Report #1467392 (the “Report”). The Complainant denies the allegations. Author did not provide a response to this matter upon invitation. Therefore, in accordance with the Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Rules (the “Rules) the Author waived their right to participate in this Arbitration. By submitting a Report on the Ripoff Report websites, the Author agreed that a dispute over this matter may be submit by the Complainant to the Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Program.
In accordance with the existing Rules at the time of this Arbitration, the Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged Statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the Statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the Arbitrator was asked to further decide if, by a preponderance of the evidence, to determine if the Statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular Statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.
In this case, because the Author did not appear and participate in the process, the Arbitrator had only the evidence submitted by the Complainant to consider. The evidence submitted included Ripoff Report #1467392, Complainant’s Arbitration Statement, prepared by counsel and also sworn to by David Ellis and Nancy Ellis, along with 11 supporting Exhibits (collectively, “Supporting Evidence”).
Each Statement appropriately challenged by the Complainant has been considered, together with the Supporting Evidence. The Arbitrator determined that certain statements challenged in the Report were false. Therefore, according to the VIP Arbitration Rules, those statements have been redacted.
Arbitrator rendered the ruling on January 3, 2020.
NOTE: A copy of the full Arbitrator’s Decision is available upon request. Please e-mail arbitration@ripoffreport.com with the name of the Complainant and Report number.
------------------------------------------
((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)).
((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)).
2 Updates & Rebuttals
author
AccountKiller,California,
United States
**NEW INFORMATION PRESENTED**
#3Author of original report
Thu, May 09, 2019
In correspondence with the company I have been enlightened to the fact the previously posted opinions may be inaccurate. Specifically, the statements made about policies being written as fraudulent, the company operating in any kind fraudulent capacities and the lack of involvement of Nancy Ellis is incorrect.
A formal apology has been issued to the company as well as several requests supplied to ROR to have the statement removed from their site, however thus far they have failed to comply. This report was filed out of concerns that has previously existed about the conduct of this company which have since been clarified and no further concerns exist.
Kelly
scottsdale,United States
Notice of Subpoena
#3General Comment
Tue, February 05, 2019
Please take notice that an action in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona in and for the County of Maricopa, Case No. CV2019-004272.
In the Action, the Plaintiff seeks to subpoena Xcentric Ventures LLC for your contact information, IP address, any other information which would identify you, and any other messages that you have posted on the website known as Rip Off Report, located at www.ripoffreport.com, under the pseudonym “An Honest and Concerned Customer – Los Angeles United States” or any other pseudonym about the Plaintiff.
If you do not respond within five (5) business days with your true and correct contact information to our law firm via email (kwpostcompliance@gmail.com) or by telephone (480-588-0449), we will subpoena the records as outlined above.
You may have a right to file and serve a response to the subpoena anonymously. If you intend to file and serve a response, please do so, or notify us of your intent to do so, on or before February 12, 2019.