Print the value of index0
  • Report:  #300735

Complaint Review: LivingTrustsOnTheWeb

LivingTrustsOnTheWeb.com Beware! Company owned by disgraced attorney who stole $1.3 million from deceased client! Internet

  • Reported By:
    Bellevue Washington
  • Submitted:
    Thu, January 17, 2008
  • Updated:
    Wed, April 09, 2008
  • LivingTrustsOnTheWeb
    LivingTrustsOnTheWeb.com
    Internet
    U.S.A.
  • Phone:
  • Category:

I was looking to make a living trust online, and I stumbled upon www.livingtrustsontheweb.com. At first, the site seemed legitimate, but I wanted to know about the people behind the company to see if I could trust it. Simple WhoIs search on the domain turned up Dennis W. Fox in Pebble Beach, California. Googled that name and found that he's a disgraced attorney who stole $1.3 million from a dead client's estate! In fact, the money was supposed to go to charity. I wish I was making this up, but it's true, and the entire story is reported in the California Bar's website:
http://members.calbar.ca.gov/search/member_detail.aspx?x=61159

August 13, 2003

A Monterey attorney who pleaded guilty to one count of grand theft for diverting more than $1 million from the estate of a deceased client for his own purposes has forfeited his law license.

The Supreme Court accepted the resignation of DENNIS W. FOX [#61159] Aug. 13.

Fox, who will turn 57 this month, was sentenced Aug. 13 to one year in county jail and 10 years probation after a judge said the circumstances of his case were so unusual that they overcame the presumption of probation ineligibility. Prosecutors had sought six years in state prison.

Deputy District Attorney Joe Buckalew said Fox, an avid golfer, funneled more than $1.3 million of his clients estate into a limited liability company he had formed and used the money to buy a home he had long coveted on a country club golf course.

His crime was the result of greed, opportunity, temptation and very poor judgment, said Buckalew. Fox had known the owner for years and had often mused over acquiring that property, he added.

Fox wrote a living trust for Pebble Beach resident Dorothy Trace, designating the Hospice Foundation for the Central Coast as her beneficiary.

He served as trustee of the estate, which was valued at $1,321,248.91 when Trace died in January 2000.

Six months after her death, Fox liquidated the estates assets, putting the money into Marcheta Lane Investments, the company he had created.

The money ultimately went into an escrow account to buy the house on Marcheta Lane for around $1 million.

But he was tripped up by his paralegal, who usually administered trusts and handled the routine details when a trust was liquidated and its assets distributed. In this case, Buckalew said, Fox said he would handle the file himself.

The paralegal realized Traces estate involved an amount that would require tax statements and notices to beneficiaries and she confronted Fox when he did not do the required work.

She also knew he had bought the Marcheta property and was so concerned that money was being misappropriated that she resigned and consulted an attorney.

The attorney contacted the Hospice Foundation, but when its representatives asked Fox about the Trace estate, he said the trust did not provide for a gift.

Later informed that the actual trust instrument showed the Hospice Foundation as sole beneficiary, Fox said the trust had been amended to delete the gift to Hospice.

It was then that the matter went to law enforcement.

Buckalew said the foundation, which has sued Fox, has not seen a dime of Traces money, although the house has since been sold for $2.2 million.

Fox pleaded guilty to grand theft June 16, with an enhancement for taking more than $1 million.

But at his sentencing last month, Foxs attorney, Larry Biegel, presented witnesses who offered emotional testimony about Foxs good character.

Biegel said his client has lost everything his friends, his reputation and his ability to earn a living.

Judge Gary Meyer also cited several factors, including the fact that Fox relinquished control of the estate and his senior age as reasons to make him eligible for probation. Lawyer years are hard years, Meyer said. The court finds Mr. Fox on the ground, and a prison sentence would be kicking him while hes there.

But Hospice Foundation President Alice Kinsler read a statement, noting that the foundation was able to fund only half the requests for help it received from care providers this year.

Had Fox carried out the wishes of his client, those organizations would not now be in a financial predicament that threatens their ability to continue providing end of life services, she said.

Had he acted properly, Kinsler added, our donors and members of the community would have had no cause to question the fiduciary role of their legal and financial advisors and others in the professional community.

Buckalew praised Foxs paralegal, who he said was forced to move from the community for a time as a result of the case. Heres a paralegal who went above and beyond to do the right thing, he said. Paralegals have great value and worth and are prized employees.

Buckalew strenuously objected to the sentence. I dont think this case was so unusual to justify overcoming the presumption of ineligibility for probation, he said. The factors the judge seized upon were not an appropriate basis.

Gnosis988
Bellevue, Washington
U.S.A.

1 Updates & Rebuttals


Dennis

Pebble Beach,
California,
U.S.A.

Ownership is NOT a "Ripoff"!

#2REBUTTAL Owner of company

Wed, April 09, 2008

The purpose of this site should be to warn consumers about companies who "ripoff" their customers, not to attack the people involved in the company. No customer of LivingTrustsontheWeb has ever received less than a high quality living trust package for the cost that was quoted on our site; we are a proud member of the BBB On-Line Protection Program and we consider our service commitment to our customers to be second to none.

It is true that seven years ago I acted in an inappropriate manner with regards to a trust which I was trustee; however, not a single penny was ever removed from the trust and, in fact, the beneficiary of the trust ultimately received over $500,000 more because of the property which I had purchased in the name of the trust. I do not wish to minimize the seriousness of my actions of which I have accepted full responsibility; however, it is because I resigned from the State Bar that I was able to devote the time and energy to creating LivingTrustsontheWeb. I was a certified specialist in Estate Planning, Probate and Trust Law for over 25 years and I was able to bring this expertise to create trust preparation software that gives our customers the ability to custom create a living trust (as well as all of the supporting documents) which is truly "attorney quality" and completely state specific. There is no other on-line living trust preparation service which is even close to our product; in fact, most are so bad that they have the potential to cause more harm than good.

I am not proud of my prior act, but it in no way affects the users of our site. In fact, it has been a motivation to provide our customers with a product and service that will exceed their expectations. Again, I fail to see why anyone would consider my past to be a "ripoff"; instead, the consumer should look at the quality of our site/product and our many pleased users as the important determining factor in whether or not to utilize our services.

Thank you for taking the time to read this rebuttal.

Dennis W. Fox

Respond to this Report!