LoralLangemeier's Wealth Foundation Arno Karssen threatened me with company lawyers if I cancelled the purchase of Loral Langemeier Wealth Foundation Course. Draper Utah
I tried to cancel the Wealth Foundation course within the three day cancellation period as provided by federal and state laws. I called the customer service department to cancel before the three days had expired.
I was put on hold and Arno Karssen was put on the line. Mr. Karssen started insulting me and was very angry. He stated the company had lawyers to take care of someone like me who tried to cancel.
I stated it was my right by law to cancel. He continued angrily to state he would have his lawyers pursue me if I cancelled the course. I was shaken by his belligerence amd insulting attitude.
At age sixty-five I could not afford a legal battle with co-operate lawyers. I was intimated into continuing the course. The course turned out to be a real estate leveraging course and get rich scheme.
I stated in my first interview with Andrew McClousky I was not interested in real estate and getting rich. I simply wanted to supplement my retirement with modest income working from my home.
I have called customer service explaining and they state Mr. Karssen would not do anything like this. I have also asked to have Mr. Karssen call me but he will not return my calls.
Robert
Farmersville, California
U.S.A.
1 Updates & Rebuttals
Loral Langemeier Wealth Foundation
Draper,Utah,
U.S.A.
Customer confirmed his enrollment and his decision to stay in the program.
#2UPDATE Employee
Tue, July 28, 2009
On November 7, 2007, Robert enrolled in the Loral Langemeier Mentoring Program. On the date of the purchase, Robert confirmed his purchase through our recorded telephone compliance and was informed about our cancellation/refund policy.
On November 9, 2007, Robert called and stated that he wanted to cancel the program. At that time, his account was placed in a cancellation status. Robert spoke with Mr. Karssen and decided to stay in the program. As a formality and to confirm the customer's choice of staying in the program, the call was transferred to a customer service representative (who is a neutral 3rd party) to verify he was committed to staying in the program and went through another recorded telephone compliance confirming his re-enrollment.
If Robert was threatened by Mr. Karssen on 11/9/07 and was forced to stay in the program against his will, why did he reconfirm his enrollment with a neutral 3rd party? In addition, Robert attended 11 coaching sessions from December 2007 through February 2008.
The allegations against Mr. Karssen are completely false and are proven by Robert's recommitment to the program and attending his coaching sessions which were fulfilled by our company.
Robert has not realized his anticipated success in the program because he chose not to pursue it to completion.
- Loral Langemeier Wealth Foundation