Lori D Warriner Loretta A Warriner CONTRACTORS BEWARE exeter New Hampshire
dont ever do work for Lori D Warriner. While doing roof for her on her Three family home. which she tuned into her insurance company to pay for. Insurance company issued 3 party check for $6,000 of which my company name was on. she signed my name and deposited in her personal acct giving me a $4,000 dollar check of which bounced. She then gave me cash. when job half completed asked her for more money she refused. I then decided to call her insurance compny to find out how much money she had recieved since i have spoken to them before. That is when i was told about the check with my name they issued to get job started. which should have been deposted in my business acct. becuse i was getting a 1099 for full amount of what insurance paid. not for her too pocket any money. to make a long story short she was paying me 9,100 but i was going to have to claim over $13,000 on my tax return, Insurance did her a favor by putting my company name on check so she wouldnt have to have her mortgage company sign off on it. She then kicked me off job left me voice mails on my phone saying she wanted to vomit on me. Tried to sue me saying it was shoddy work. Of which i have letters from building inspector and other roofing co hired by her insurace, her ins wanted too pay me more money for work completed but she told them no. She was finally arrested for forgery in oct 2012 of which is posted on internet under exeter police logs. She was then indited in superior court in march 2013 on felony charges. She pleaded gulity in august 2013.. being greedy got her no where as she puts on one of her DJ sites money h**l ya.....So any one doing work for her beware...
3 Updates & Rebuttals
bob
exeter,New Hampshire,
setting record straight
#4Author of original report
Fri, January 03, 2014
First of all the check that homeowner was convicted of crime is not the bounced check. It is the forged check of which homeowner (lori d) was trying to defraud me out of thousands of dollars. SHE was CONVICTED and pleaded guilty. by a court of law of which has all access to my reputation. Ripoff report states make sure statements are true or be prepared to get sued.
Homeowner should stick to repairing her own reputation. And the facts of the case. She is the one with the criminal record.
Bad mouthing me and bringing my wifes heath into this is not too proffesional.
Roofless in NH
Exeter,New Hampshire,
check out the all the reports on b****!
#4REBUTTAL Individual responds
Fri, October 18, 2013
I think all you'll need to do is check out my professional reputation (all positives) and then check out his reputation - all negatives. He has been sued and in court over 23 times and has declared bankruptcy multiple times. He's been convicted in assault cases and done time in jail. I think that about covers it. yes, my check bounced and then I gave him cash to cover it. I'm pretty sure that doesn't make me a criminal. lol.
Fortunately we found a good roofing contractor that finished the job in 4 days (vs bobo's 4 month long oddessy) and documented all the problems with photographs. All work bobo did was removed because it was done wrong. Perforating the membrane pretty much voids a warrantee, as does improperly affixing the shingles to the roof.
And I wouldn't waste my vomit on that pathetic creature. Its good to know that he and his wife are on social security disability... at least he isn't screwing up other peoples houses!
Fact Checker
Portsmouth,New Hampshire,
Bogus report - many facts are missing
#4Consumer Comment
Thu, October 10, 2013
Please don't read much into this report as for the most part it's bogus and there are many facts which appear to have been deliberately omitted to slant the situation as opposed to what actually occurred. I would suggest that if any party is guilty of anything in this matter, it would be the contractor whom authorized Ms. Warriner to sign off on the check that was issued in both parties names as it was only done so funds could be promptly provided to the contractor for work to be done (which turned out to be of poor craftsmanship thus requiring a competent contractor at a much additional expense to Ms. Warriner). Legally this insurance carrier should have issued their check in the name of the mortgage holder and mortgagee. In any event there is much more to this matter that has not been revealed by the contractor whom posted this report and the only thing that Ms. Warriner was guilty of was signing off on the issued check, with the confirmed authorization of the contactor and then providing a majority of those funds while holding the remainder to be forwarded upon satisfactorily completing the repairs to her building/multiple unit dwelling in Exeter, NH.