Print the value of index0
  • Report:  #229648

Complaint Review: Love Beal Nixon - First Resolution Investment Corporation

Love Beal Nixon - First Resolution Investment Corporation Ripoff, Sent discovery letter, didnt get what I asked for, NOW WHAT Oklahoma City Oklahoma

  • Reported By:
    Davis Oklahoma
  • Submitted:
    Wed, January 10, 2007
  • Updated:
    Thu, February 08, 2007
  • Love Beal Nixon - First Resolution Investment Corporation
    Po Box 32738
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
    U.S.A.
  • Phone:
  • Category:

Iam being sued by First Resolution Investment Corp.I asked for motion of Discovery to LBN.I recieved the letter from LBN in the response to the discovery I requested.

I asked for a signed contract or signed agreement, date of last activity, statue of limitations has not expired, account statements from the original creditor, something that first resolution has the right to collect, payment history starting with the original creditor. detailed statement of what they say I owed. Name and contact of a person for First resolution. I didnt get any of this paper work.

They just sent me the name of the original creditor(Providian) and their address,the amount owed,and the account number.

Do I need to send them another letter requesting these documents again or can I do a motion to dismiss based on the fact that they didnt send me what i asked for. Would like some advice. Thanks













Jason
Davis, Oklahoma
U.S.A.

4 Updates & Rebuttals


Roseanne

Lanford,
Illinois,
U.S.A.

Why don't judges just read Rip-off Report?

#5Consumer Comment

Thu, February 08, 2007

A lot of valuable time could be saved in America's courtrooms if judges would just read Rip-off Report!

Judges assume that any scumbucket collector, loan servicer, bank or credit card complaint is a valid one. They are wrong in assuming that in this day and age.

Judges could sort the wheat from the chaff pretty quickly by a quick look at this site. It would save $millions$ for the taxpayers and maybe put some icky lawyers out of a job, too.

We have terrorists and politicians that need space in the courtrooms and this may just be the method to clear docket space.


Tim

Valparaiso,
Indiana,
U.S.A.

Motion to Dismiss was Probably not the Appropriate Course of Action

#5Consumer Comment

Thu, February 08, 2007

Failure to cooperate in discovery is usually not sufficient grounds for a motion to dismiss unless you have a court order demanding discovery. Even in that circumstance, you are not likely to succeed on a motion to dismiss.

First, a motion to dismiss must be based entirely on the "pleadings," which means the complaint, your answer, their response to your answer, etc. The motion to dismiss is usually appropriate only when the complaint itself fails to set forth a valid cause of action (i.e. you are being sued for something that isn't against the law in the first place).

The proper course of action would have been to serve them, along with your discovery request, with "interrogatories," which is a series of questions, the answers to which should be "admit" "deny" or "lacks sufficient information to respond." The questions posed would be those relevant to the evidence they will need to prove their case. Such questions would include things like the date the debt arose.

They would be given 20 days (in most states) to answer the interrogatories. If they failed to answer within the given time, the court will deem that the unanswered questions would have been answered in your favor.

You would then take the result of the interrogatories and, if appropriate, file a motion for summary judgment. For example, if the interrrogatories bore out that the debt is barred by the statute of limitations, you would argue that summary judgment should be entered in your favor due to the lapse of the SOL. Summary judgment achieves the same effect as a motion to dismiss, but is based on evidence outside of the pleadings.

I don't have enough information to tell you whether or not you still have time to serve interrogatories, or to fill you in on your state's procedure for doing so. But, nonetheless, a motion to dismiss was probably not the appropriate course of action.

Steve is correct that LBN complaints are usually defeatable one way or another, but if you go about it the wrong way, you could end up prejudicing yourself.

Get yourself a lawyer, and good luck!


Jason

ardmore,
Oklahoma,
U.S.A.

Motion to dismiss denied,Now what !!!!!!

#5Author of original report

Sat, January 27, 2007

I filed a motion to dismiss, but it got denied.Do i need to keep asking for discovery or what?


Steve [Not A Lawyer]

Bradenton,
Florida,
U.S.A.

Jason, this is the standard LBN runaround

#5Consumer Suggestion

Wed, January 10, 2007

Jason,

LBN NEVER provides validation. And if you hold your ground, they always dismiss on debt issues.

Yes, you need to file the motion to dismiss immediately. Ask for dismissal WITH predjudice.

Be sure to detail that they have no documentation to support their claim as demonstrated in the response to your discovery motion.

In closing once again clearly deny the entire claim as being frivolous.

You SHOULD countersue them for your damages. You might as well get paid for your time and expense in dealing with their nonsense, and the frivolous lawsuit.

Also file a Bar Association complaint against them for the ethics issues. It will get filed next to mine and at least 100 others. They have a VERY bad reputation. They need to get disbarred.

Respond to this Report!