Complaint Review: Magistrate Daniel Goulette; Resurrection Cemetery Clinton Township Michigan; Robert Schrage

Daniel J. Goulette - P43717
Magistrate
41B District Court
40700 Romeo Plank Rd
Clinton Township, MI 48038

Phone: (586) 286-8010
E-mail: danieljgoulette@aol.com

Resurrection Cemetery
Clinton Township Michigan


If Magistrate Goulette ever wants to run for judge BEWARE! He is biased in favor of business, and has the legal opinion that contracts are a matter of whim.

See http://clr.org/miwanted.html

http://courthouseforum.com/forums/thread.php?id=975694

http://courthouseforum.com/upload/phpSgArBI.100_0485.JPG

Magistrate Goulette believes that a business can take private property without noticing the owner. Magistrate Goulette also believes that a business does not need to post their rules so the affected person can know the rules. Magistrate Goulette believes that rules dont apply to a Marlinga, but apply to everyone else.

As a Macomb County Michigan magistrate in a small claims contract dispute, Daniel Goulette stated he didnt want to read the Plaintiffs statement of facts but would read Resurrection Cemeterys supposed rules, even though these rules are not enforced and are not posted on the internet or at the cemetery. Magistrate Goulette was apparently biased when he determined, that a contract signed in 1979 by another party, with Resurrection cemetery can be selectively enforced in 2007.

When there was a precedent and preponderance of evidence that the cemetery was allowing certain graves to habitually bend the rules by allowing flower containers to adjoin between graves, the cemetery selectively chose to remove the containers between only two specific graves. These containers were high-end, heavy-duty containers which would withstand cold Michigan winters; the cemetery management agreed that most likely one of their employees removed the flower containers and their contents. These high-end containers were not put near the dumpster, but apparently taken by cemetery employees for their personal use.

If Magistrate Goulette believes that contracts can be selectively enforced, then a contract is not really a contract and is really a matter of whim, so why bother with contracts in the first place.

Magistrate Daniel Goulette has a different opinion than Macomb Circuit Judge Maceroni regarding selective enforcement of a contract.

http://www.macombdaily.com/stories/110706/loc_chief001.shtml

"The union contract and law require that the township select the chief from a pool of potential applicants from positions of police captain and lieutenant, and downward in the hierarchy.

Maceroni says the township engaged in "selective enforcement."

"The township failed to follow the procedure in place for filling it; electing, instead, to go outside the applicant pool contemplated by Act 78 and the CBA (collective bargaining agreement) when finding a successor," Maceroni says in a ruling. "The private contract between the township and a third party cannot, then, be found to supersede the previously negotiated contract between the township and the POAM whenever convenience dictates, leaving the adverse party without recourse."

If Magistrate Goulette ever wants to run for judge BEWARE! He is biased in favor of business, and has the legal opinion that contracts are a matter of whim.


Attachment

Truth
Clinton Twp, Michigan
U.S.A.