Matt Gagnon ripoff Mr. Gagnon and Mazu Publishing Company have made false and defamatory statements and misled the public concerning services and products. Portland Oregon
Matt Gagnon took $300.00 from me and has not
honored his agreement with me. I've filed a lawsuit
against Matt Gagnon. Details below:
Matt Gagnon and Mazu Publishing Company are currently defendants awaiting trial for false advertising, libel per se, interference with contract, false advertising under California Business & Professions Code section 17200 &
17500.
Matt Gagnon, the defendant awaits his time to stand before a federal judge for his actions of malice, fraud, and opression which will be proved at his trial.
The defendants, Matt Gagnon and Mazu Publishing
Company have acted with knowledge of the falsity of their statements and with the express intent of causing competitive injury to the innocent victims involved.
Mr. Gagnon and Mazu Publishing Company have made false and defamatory statements and misled the public concerning services and products.
Mr. Gagnon had his first hearing in March of 2005. His trial will be in 2006.
Court Reference Information:
CASE NO. CV. S-04-2240 EJG CMK
COMPLAINT FOR LANHAM ACT VIOLATIONS, LIBEL PER SE, INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT, UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES (CAL. BUS. & PROF. CODE 17200 ET SEQ.)
Judge: William B. Shubb
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Jason
Redding, California
U.S.A.
1 Updates & Rebuttals
M
Portland,Oregon,
U.S.A.
Office Manager
#2UPDATE Employee
Thu, September 15, 2005
I am assuming by what little information is provided in regards to the complaintant, that the lawsuit being referred to is one instigated by a former Mazu Pub. student, Jason Ryan Isaksen. Isaksen purchased the MDM3 from Mazu in Aug. 2003 and no complaint regarding Isaksen's purchase was ever rec'd, nor was any kind of refund requested. What agreement with "Jason" has not been honored?
The lawsuit currently underway is NOT related to the package Isaksen purchased, the MDM3, (as is implied in the complaint), but to Isaksen's general claims of false advertising and unfair business practices against Mazu/Matt Gagnon, owner, which were preceded by Isaksen developing and marketing his own product, containing much of what was provided to him in the MDM3. No mention of "malice" is in the lawsuit. Mazu/Matt Gagnon firmly believe in all that is currently available to a viewer at www.mazu.com/scams/isaksen.php and do not believe any of it to be false, as the complaint states. Nor has Mazu Pub/Matt Gagnon made any false or defamatory statements or misled the public in regards to any MAZU product. As the review of Mr. Isaksen has not been proven false in any way, I don't believe Mazu Pub/Matt Gagnon has made any false or defamatory statements or misled the public in that regards either.
Many of the statements contained in the complaint is based on the opinion of the writer. If any SOLID facts can be presented, I will be happy to respond to them.