mugshots.com. florida mugshots who's arrested and Chase Johnson mugshots pennsylvania, Louisiana etc Mugshots.com and its progeny with its anonymous owners (Michael Robertson) lashes out against class action with vicious attack internet, Florida
Now that the filing of the class action with expanding numbers of named plaintiffs is about to be initiated in Florida after the holidays, the Mugshot owners have expanded their personal attacks on me to include one of my lawyers, Joel Stempler. This time" Martin from Alaska" becomes m**o from the U.S.A with his personal attacks on me and one of my Florida lawyers. m**o has a lot to say about me calling me a "loser"," piece of s**t' (as Martin from Alaska) and other F bombs and obscenities. Then he posts in great detail my history of taking on bar associations who are really very ineffectual in regulating lawyers. However, they can be extremely effective in conducting political vendettas against "public interest lawyer" such as Mr. Mark. None of this is relevant, I can prove that I never cheated a single client. The dissent pointed out that I was never allowed to defend myself in Connecticut and that the judge Freed,a political enemy. disciplined me in a "kangaroo proceedings" in Ct. when I was home on my Jewish holiday babysitting for my infants sons while my wife was hospitalized in Wellington Florida. These matters occurred years ago. I forgot more about Rule 11 sanctions than you might know. Come out from anonymity and face a defamation suit you coward. "Call me" as the song says. 1/2 of America has been arrested at some time or other and of course they are all "losers." Let's see who the ultimate winners are. You crooks are without a drop of "redeeming social value." How can you greedos call yourself advocates of free speech when you are extorting good citizens out of their hard earned money by trying to humiliate them. Sure I am a "wife beater" and one of the five most viewed mugshots. Give me a break. Next I will be Jesse James incarnate. My so called "criminal history" includes a harmless telephone made in 2002 to a woman (who testified that it wasn't threatening merely telling her about a court appearence).
The collective stories of the myriad named plaintiffs will bury google and the mugshot team. They have no defense; it is not public right to know;, it is extortion. Call or email me at 337-893-4388 for details or get in touch with Joel Stempler, who is a total winner and hero for taking on these "bad boys" We will not be intimidated by phantoms lying and coming up with distortions to defend the indefensible. Let's see how the judiciary reacts to their bogus claims of free speech. Mark Daniel Friedland
1 Updates & Rebuttals
Blogging
New York,INTERPOL
#2Consumer Comment
Tue, July 09, 2013
INTERPOL
http://www.interpol.int/Forms/Contact_INTERPOL
US Code
18 USC 1030 - Fraud and related activity in connection with computers
(2) intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or exceeds authorized access, and thereby obtains
(C) information from any protected computer;
Criminal Resource Manual 1663 Protection Of Public Records and Documents. The taking of a public record or document is prohibited by 18 U.S.C. 641. DOJ. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm01663.htm
18 USC § 641 - Public money, property or records
1. Whoever steals or purloins public records.
2. Whoever knowingly converts public records to their use.
3. Without authority sells public records.
3. Without authority conveys public records.
18 USC 2319 - Criminal infringement of a copyright
17 USC 506 - Criminal offenses
(a) Criminal Infringement.
(1) In general.Any person who willfully infringes a copyright shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18, if the infringement was committed
(A) for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain;
Governmental Prima Facie Evidence of name and likeness copyright:
State Certified Birth Certificate, State Drivers License, Passport and other government documents and records created to identify and validate name and likeness.
18 USC 1028A - Aggravated identity theft
Whoever, knowingly transfers (steals), possesses, or uses (website), without lawful authority, a means of identification (mugshots) of another person shall, in addition to the punishment provided for such felony, be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 2 years.
Internet Spyware (I-SPY) Prevention Act of 2007
Intentionally obtains (steals/screen scraps), or transmits (internet) to another person information with the intent to defraud (unpublish/repair reputation).
18 USC 875 - Interstate communications
Transmits (internet) communication interstate (world wide web) with the intent to injure reputation to extort (unpublish/repair reputation).
18 USC 2261A - Stalking
(2) with the intent
(A) to kill, injure, harass, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person in another State or tribal jurisdiction or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States; or
(i) that person;
(ii) a member of the immediate family (as defined in section 115 1 of that person; or
(iii) a spouse or intimate partner of that person;
18 USC 873 - Blackmail
Whoever, under a threat of informing, or as a consideration for not informing, against any violation of any law of the United States, demands or receives any money or other valuable thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
18 USC 880 - Receiving the proceeds of extortion
A person who receives, possesses, conceals, or disposes of any money or other property which was obtained from the commission of any offense under this chapter that is punishable by imprisonment for more than 1 year, knowing the same to have been unlawfully obtained, shall be imprisoned not more than 3 years, fined under this title, or both.
Bizarre Logic and Reasoning
If kidnappers called the ransom amount the returning person fee would it bedazzle the system again? If the kidnappers rationalized their acts with the same logic would the system be mystified by them? Reasoning, they had to go through the hassle of kidnapping someone hence they are entitled to the returning person fee (Ransom Money).
If blackmailers called the extortion amount the unpublish/reputation repair fee would it bedazzle the system? Further, if the blackmailers rationalized their acts with the same logic would the system by mystified be them? Reasoning, they had to go through the hassle of stealing government property, identity theft, stalking people, holding people to involuntary servitude, injuring their reputation and collecting an unlawful debt hence they are entitled to the fee (extortion).