Print the value of index0
  • Report:  #1062329

Complaint Review: Paszko Attorney Service Inc

Paszko Attorney Service, Inc AKA Zac D Paszko False Proof of Service, Perjury, Fraud, Lied straight to the Judge's face! Coronado Newport Apartments, Illegal Proof of Service, UDR Newport, Orange County Superior Court, Blatant lies! Falsified documents, Orange California

  • Reported By:
    Gregory K — Newport Beach California
  • Submitted:
    Wed, June 26, 2013
  • Updated:
    Wed, August 13, 2014

2013-06-26

So today my cousin and I had an appearance at the Superior Court of California, County of Orange.  This was for a case of "unlawful detainer", where neither my cousin or myself were ever served any paperwork whatsoever!

Appearing in front of the Judge, we wanted to legally contradict Zac D Paszko as he stated in Official Court Documents that he personally served both my cousin and myself at 6:50 AM at our residence.

Mr. Paszko blatantly lied right to the Judges face, stating that he banged on our door at 6:50 AM.  He stated that my cousin opened the door and I was right behind him at which time we were both served in person.

This is totally outrageous!!  First of all we are two grown men that have our own businesses and always work late hours.  We are in our mid-forties and VERY familiar with how courts operate and standard procedure.  We typically go to sleep around 2:30 AM and are up at 10-11 AM or so.  We both are forced to wear ear plugs because there is constant noise outside of our apartment located at Coronado North Newport Beach, a " UDR " company that has been involved in many shady practices.  ( Google UDR Complaints and see for yourself )  Being a couple of pretty big guys who of course have separate bedrooms, we would not get up at the same time due to a knock on the door.  IF either of us actually heard a knock, then ONE of us would ask who it is and open the door.  In a "Fantasy World" let's say for sake of argument that I opened the door without asking who it was and was served with papers.  I surely would not wake up my cousin so that he could be served as well.  I would tell the server to come back later and put the burden on him.  We are not idiots!!  At any rate, Mr. Paszko NEVER came to our unit and NEVER served either of us.  

What is truly dis-concerning is that since he is a licensed process server, the ONLY way to prove he did not serve us would have been if we could show we were actually not home.  In other words, his word against ours and he wins because he has a registration number.

I am certain that he has done this many times to people and would love any contact if you have had such issues!

My goal is to get his license taken away from him as well as getting some well deserved Jail time!!!

We were totally railroaded!!!  I guess if one of us would have stated that we spent the night at a girlfriends house, etc which would have been a lie, it would have been to our benefit, however it seems that taking the high ground and being honest really does not help one prevail when you are up against extremely unscrupulous people.

If you had any similar issues against this person, please contact me and we can mutually get some form of justice!!!

 

Thank you for listening!!!

 

 

1 Updates & Rebuttals


David

Santa Barbara,
California,

Consider the Source

#2General Comment

Wed, August 13, 2014

I wasn't there but something comes to mind immediately:

People served with Unlawful Detainers are not always looking for some reason to delay the inevitable, and filing some motion with the court gives them extra time. This is a common practice with U.D. deefendants, and in fact, there is a plethora of people/companies "out there" offering to show U.D. defendants all the legal (though posibly unethical) ways to delay a U.D. case.

 This seems to be a classic case of such a tactic.

 Really, do you think Paszko is going to put their license on the line for the few dollars they get? And remember, there was a judge (or maybe a Pro Tem (attorney playing judge) hearing the matter and he/she has a chance to judge the credibility of the witnesses.

Lastly, I have been dealing with Paszko for a few months, and I have found the people there to be as helpful as anyone could want; they have gone above-and-beyond in helping me and even refused when I wanted to provide a "bonus" for their better than excellent help.

 My view is from more than 40 years as a civil litigation paralegal in California.

 

Just my input.

 

 

 

Respond to this Report!