Print the value of index0
Paul Randle-Jolliffe Fraudster, Thief, Lazy Bast*rd, Bum, Tramp, Tw*t, Pervert, Freak, Drug User. South Coast Of United Kingdom Internet
This Tramp is the lowest of low.
He never works and never wants to. He uses the old "it's not my fault" for what goes wrong, it's always someone else.
He is a serial liar and con Man. I caught him driving with no license, extracting funds for his wild a*s schemes of business to which all have a similar note. They are basically "Invest in my idea" and for your return I will claim from the State for my Rent, food and living cost. For your Investment, I will stay in bed until at least 2.00pm each day, always be late for any proposed meetings and generally F*ck Up Everything I am left to deal with.
I can confirm that I saw Mr Paul Randle-Jolliffe's report by someone from South Africa and can confirm that he left many people out of pocket with his Telecom Scheme to which he blames BT for the mistakes which is pure "BULL SH*T". Mr Jolliffe, take it on the chin, it's like everything you do, it's your lazy attitude and failure to put in more than 20 minuets in one day that is the problem.
You are a liar, you left your family in debt with phone bill's, credit cards etc. You are Con Man, a Fraudster and General all round "Lazy Bast*rd".
You should be reported on www.freewebs.com/name-shame which I have sen and con confirm you fit all the requirements to be on.
James
Portsmouth
United Kingdom
4 Updates & Rebuttals
Myconcept
Shanklin,United Kingdom
defamation removal by google
#5REBUTTAL Individual responds
Wed, April 20, 2016
this report has now been removed by google.co.uk search for defamation
Myconcept
Shanklin,Peter Hulbert the Fraudster
#5REBUTTAL Individual responds
Sun, November 24, 2013
walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/fraudster-jailed-over-600000-welsh-5907959
Fraudster jailed over £600,000 Welsh Government hovercraft racing scam
11 Sep 2013 15:17
Peter Hulbert, 54, from Sheffield, sentenced to four years in prison after trying to convince the Welsh Government to back a racing hovercraft scheme
Accessories and Abettors Act 1861
AUTHOR: Fraud by poster - ()
SUBMITTED: Saturday, November 23, 2013
Accessories and Abettors Act 1861
8Abettors in misdemeanors.
Whosoever shall aid, abet, counsel, or procure the commission of [F1any indictable offence] , whether the same be [F1an offence] at common law or by virtue of any Act passed or to be passed, shall be liable to be tried, indicted, and punished as a principal offender.
This serves as notice that they should be removed by Google and Ripoffreport.
1Offence of sending letters etc. with intent to cause distress or anxiety.
(1)Any person who sends to another person—
(a)a [F1letter, electronic communication or article of any description] which conveys—
(i)a message which is indecent or grossly offensive;
(ii)a threat; or
(iii)information which is false and known or believed to be false by the sender; or
s1 Prohibition of harassment
(1) A person must not pursue a course of conduct-
(a) which amounts to harassment of another, and
(b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.
(1A) A person must not pursue a course of conduct -
(a) which involves harassment of two or more persons, and
(b) which he knows or ought to know involves harassment of those persons, and
(c) by which he intends to persuade any person (whether or not one of those mentioned above)-
(i) not to do something that he is entitled or required to do, or
(ii) to do something that he is not under any obligation to do
I.E. TO STOP ME PERUSING MY LAWFUL RIGHTS IN COURT which also constitutes and attempt by him to pervert the course of justice.
2A Offence of stalking
(1)A person is guilty of an offence if—
(a)the person pursues a course of conduct in breach of section 1(1), and
(b)the course of conduct amounts to stalking.
(2)For the purposes of subsection (1)(b) (and section 4A(1)(a)) a person’s course of conduct amounts to stalking of another person if—
(a)it amounts to harassment of that person,
(b)the acts or omissions involved are ones associated with stalking, and
(c)the person whose course of conduct it is knows or ought to know that the course of conduct amounts to harassment of the other person.
(3)The following are examples of acts or omissions which, in particular circumstances, are ones associated with stalking—
(a)following a person,
(b)contacting, or attempting to contact, a person by any means,
(c)publishing any statement or other material—
(i)relating or purporting to relate to a person, or
(ii)purporting to originate from a person,
(d)monitoring the use by a person of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication,
Rebutal
London,Accessories and Abettors Act 1861
#5REBUTTAL Individual responds
Sat, November 23, 2013
Accessories and Abettors Act 1861
8Abettors in misdemeanors.
Whosoever shall aid, abet, counsel, or procure the commission of [F1any indictable offence] , whether the same be [F1an offence] at common law or by virtue of any Act passed or to be passed, shall be liable to be tried, indicted, and punished as a principal offender.
This serves as notice that they should be removed by Google and Ripoffreport.
1Offence of sending letters etc. with intent to cause distress or anxiety.
(1)Any person who sends to another person—
(a)a [F1letter, electronic communication or article of any description] which conveys—
(i)a message which is indecent or grossly offensive;
(ii)a threat; or
(iii)information which is false and known or believed to be false by the sender; or
s1 Prohibition of harassment
(1) A person must not pursue a course of conduct-
(a) which amounts to harassment of another, and
(b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.
(1A) A person must not pursue a course of conduct -
(a) which involves harassment of two or more persons, and
(b) which he knows or ought to know involves harassment of those persons, and
(c) by which he intends to persuade any person (whether or not one of those mentioned above)-
(i) not to do something that he is entitled or required to do, or
(ii) to do something that he is not under any obligation to do
I.E. TO STOP ME PERUSING MY LAWFUL RIGHTS IN COURT which also constitutes and attempt by him to pervert the course of justice.
2A Offence of stalking
(1)A person is guilty of an offence if—
(a)the person pursues a course of conduct in breach of section 1(1), and
(b)the course of conduct amounts to stalking.
(2)For the purposes of subsection (1)(b) (and section 4A(1)(a)) a person’s course of conduct amounts to stalking of another person if—
(a)it amounts to harassment of that person,
(b)the acts or omissions involved are ones associated with stalking, and
(c)the person whose course of conduct it is knows or ought to know that the course of conduct amounts to harassment of the other person.
(3)The following are examples of acts or omissions which, in particular circumstances, are ones associated with stalking—
(a)following a person,
(b)contacting, or attempting to contact, a person by any means,
(c)publishing any statement or other material—
(i)relating or purporting to relate to a person, or
(ii)purporting to originate from a person,
(d)monitoring the use by a person of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication,
Myconcept
Shanklin,Europe,
United Kingdom
AnotherPeter Hulbert Hoax
#5REBUTTAL Individual responds
Fri, June 20, 2008
Just like the others another Peter Hulbert Hoax.
Yawn!!!!