Print the value of index0
  • Report:  #1163921

Complaint Review: Randolph County Court Illnoise

Randolph County Court Illnoise Sherry Johnson, Judge Gross Deceptive, Nepotism, Chester Illinois

  • Reported By:
    Wfoggman — Arnold Missouri
  • Submitted:
    Tue, July 22, 2014
  • Updated:
    Thu, July 24, 2014
  • Randolph County Court Illnoise
    One Taylor Street
    Chester, Illinois
    USA
  • Phone:
    6188265000
  • Category:

I was soon to learn the Court Clerk will not read one sheet of paper supplied to the court unless there is a money order attached to the submission. I attempted to provide the court with information on my case which contained documentation of Criminal Intent but was refused and returned to me with a note making clear there had to be funds attached to this paperwork. The last I knew it did not cost any individual anythng to expose criminal intent to any legal authority that could do something about the intent. I stand wrong ! ! ! I filed Indigent paperwork with the case when I returned it this time and have heard nothing back nor received said paperwork back. What I do know is Judge Gross did rule in favor of the criminal intent by the other party making clear in his court it is OK to use criminal acts to screw another person where he will rule in favor of the criminal act.

2 Updates & Rebuttals


Wfoggman

Arnold,
Missouri,

Correct Venue

#3Author of original report

Thu, July 24, 2014

It is better to remain silent and thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.


Robert

Irvine,
California,

Wrong Venue

#3Consumer Comment

Tue, July 22, 2014

I actually really have no idea what you mean by "criminal intent".  But if there is a legitimate crime you are correct you need to report it, but you need to report it to Law Enforcement.  The Clerk of the Court is NOT the person you submit this intent to.  You should have been down to the District Attornies Office or the Detective Division of your Police/Sheriff Department.

Next, if this is against a party with an active suit(which since you mention a judge I imagine is the case), you need to go to that hearing and present your proof at that time. If you were the plantiff or defendent you have that right.  If you were neither the plantiff or defendent one has to wonder why all of this mattered to you? 

Respond to this Report!