Print the value of index0
  • Report:  #442126

Complaint Review: Robert L Miller

Robert L Miller - Miller & Associates - Robert Louis Miller Robert Miller will not deliver what he promises Santa Ana California

  • Reported By:
    Santa Ana California
  • Submitted:
    Thu, April 09, 2009
  • Updated:
    Sat, June 20, 2009
  • Robert L Miller
    1801 Parkcourt
    Santa Ana, California
    U.S.A.
  • Phone:
  • Category:

Robert L Miller will meet with you and smile and promise you that your loved one's future is secure and that everything will handled in the proper "legal manner. When you write out your check, it will be HIS LEGAL services that deliver empty promises. As warning it will cost your sanity and loved one's future. Today, our family is dealing with the aftermath of this person's lack of legal expertise.
I have read other reports and agree.
When you require an attorney to defend you, Robert Miller will not deliver..

Caroline
Santa Ana, California
U.S.A.

3 Updates & Rebuttals


Caroline

Santa Ana,
California,
U.S.A.

Robert L Miller will not deliver on his promises update from original poster

#4Author of original report

Sat, June 20, 2009

Robert L Millers defensive backlashing on a former client is extremely immature but does not surpirse any of us.

I filed the original complaint in this thread. I never said I was his client. He has ruined our family financially. Have you no shame Mr. Miller?

I am glad to see others making complaints here.


Runamuck

Anytown,
California,
U.S.A.

Robert Louis Miller's libelous comments prove he is factually challenged once again

#4Consumer Comment

Sun, June 14, 2009

Proof attorney Robert Louis Miller is seriously misguided. I am not the person who posted the original comment here using the name Caroline. It's just proof he has more people upset with him than he will admit... so let me repeat...

Robert Louis Miller's libelous comments prove he is factually challenged. His comments here are absolutely absurd, false and further proof that he did not know the facts of my case and didn't read a word of it.

His MIS-representation of me in 2006 was disingenuous at best and criminal at worst. He lied to me by telling me the Prosecutor and judge were going to put me in jail if I did not cop a plea to the FALSE and FRAUDULENT charges against me. By his own internal notes page that he handed to me during arbitration, he states: the prosecutor is not looking at any jail time, but get her to cop a plea by holding jail time over her head - this is FRAUD. Since there was NEVER any real threat of my going to jail for these FRAUDULENT CHARGES AGAINST ME - Miller's incorrect comment here about keeping me out of jail is complete and utter nonsense.

Again and I repeat, Mr. Miller had proof and declarations of my innocence. I was proven to be with friends and family members while my ex-boyfriend and his convicted felon business partner were sending email and making phone calls to my ex-boyfriend. I was not doing any of it. Yet he chose to do whatever the prosecutor told him to do. I was proven to be other places including with my family at the hospital at my father's bedside before he passed away while my ex-boyfriend was emailing and calling himself in order to set me up.

Of 25 faked phone calls that my ex-boyfriend was actually making to himself through a computer, all but 4 were dropped. So if 21 counts were dismissed because I was not the one making them via this web site that the ex-boyfriend set up himself, how is it that I was making the other 4? I wasn't. The ridiculous allegation that had me in two different cities at the same time went unnoticed by Robert L Miller, the prosecutor, and the judge. Because no one ever bothered to read the absurdity of it. I called him out on it in court but he ignored me and told me to be quiet and plead No contest. I guess looking back I should have asked the dishonest prosecutor to specify which city I was supposed to have been in, in order to clarify the fraudulent charge.

Prosecutor Sharon Panian has to win her cases, false or not. And the people posting comments about her stalking a married police officer are people who know her. I knew nothing of her disturbing stalking behavior until reading the posts about her. But I find it fascinating.

Further Prosecutor Sharon Panian had an eye-witness give her facts of my whereabouts during another false accusation that I was sending email to the ex-boyfriend. Panian lied to the judge, she withheld the information that she was just given by a friend and neighbor who is also himself and attorney. The email in question was apparently sent to my ex-boyfriend by one of his co-workers who later denied sending it. I do not know this person to have made up his name, it was another false allegation. And the Detective in charge lied to the judge about it's origin. Claiming that it came from me yet in the same sentence he stated he couldn't trace it.

The Detective in the case made several false and fraudulent statements about what actually transpired and I have already mentioned them here. Miller knew the police reports written by the Detective were false and told me AND the arbitrator that his intention was to filed a motion to dismiss due to the false statement in the search warrant application. But claimed he didn't have time.

Further proof that he has the facts of my case completely disjointed: He stated that David L Hadjes is my ex boyfriend! David L Hadjes was NEVER my ex-Boyfriend! This is undeniable Proof he is incoherent and has the facts completely wrong. David L Hadjes is the CONVICTED FELON Business partner of my ex-boyfriend. Since he did not read nor familiarize himself with the facts of my case he was incapable of defending me. THIS is called ineffective assistance of counsel. David L Hadjes apparently has also fled Arkansas leaving behind 2 ex-wives and a number of creditors and law suites.

Miller is sidestepping the fact that he was sued by another woman for malpractice, fraud, and negligence and that there are several complaints about his services as an attorney on the Better Business Bureau.

It's pathetic how clueless he is and incapable of recognizing his own shortcomings. But I guess when you have payments due to a Trustee for a Million dollar bankruptcy you'll do and say anything to potential clients in order to get them to give you money!

His FALSE accusations that I am posting comments all over the internet are absolutely not true. It is Mr. Miller posting lies about me and my case. He is a fraud, he is a liar and his comments here prove it.

Further proof of his lies and misinformation: Mr. Miller did not represent me in a case in 2000. The case he did represent me in was in 2003 and was DISMISSED by the judge. It was proven to be false and he knows this. His statements here are not only completely false but libelous. He uses the words priors which is a bad choice of words. If you want to talk about priors lets talk about the Law Suite against you for Fraud, Malpractice and Negligence.

The only thing inconceivable about this matter is the fact the Mr. Miller is allowed to practice law in the first place. He should have his license revoked and should be disbarred for his continued unethical behavior.


Robert Miller

Santa Ana,
California,
U.S.A.

This client's report is entirely false - no "Caroline" has even been a client!

#4REBUTTAL Owner of company

Thu, June 04, 2009

This complaint, among others with the exact same wording, is all the work of a former client, Judy Sheehan, who I represented in 2006. Ms. Sheehan is a criminal convicted of stalking and harassing her ex boyfriend. She is angry that I was able to avoid all jail time in her case, and that the court required her to go to counseling.

She has been creating false accounts to try to defame not only my character, but the character of everyone involved in her case (the police officer, the judge, the prosecutor, the arbitrator, and me). Everyone associated with her wrongful conduct have been subject to false statements, and an all out campaign on the internet to slander and defame the name of everyone involved.

The proof is in the links, which ripoff report will not allow me to post directly, but which can be accessed through a simple search for the following:

Judge Deborah Andrews: topix+long beach+ deborah+ andrews

Detective Donald Wood: courthouseforum + donald wood

Arbitrator Sherry Honer: ripoffreport + sherry honer

City Attorney Prosecutor Sharon Panian: topix + courthouse forum + latimesblogs + sharon panian

Alleged Victim of client Dave Hadjes (client's ex boyfriend): ripoffreport + dave hadjes; or topix + benton + dave hadjes

Me, her defense attorney Robert Miller: topix+long-beach+robert miller; or ripoffreport + robert miller + santa ana

Each person commenting on this story is a separate identity and personality that Judy Sheehan has created, just to make it appear that more than one person have commented. In truth, this is all the work of one woman. Unfortunately, this client is mentally unstable, and her priors show her true past history. It is inconceivable that the client could have so many people, who had never met, and who were all in different agencies, create a huge conspiracy against her.

I do have any clients in our records over the past 15 years named Caroline. This report is false.

Respond to this Report!