SPECIFIC INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT WAS FOUND TO BE FALSE/DEFAMATORY BY A COURT. OUT OF RESPECT FOR THE JUDICIAL PROCESS, THE SPECIFIC INFORMATION THAT WAS FOUND FALSE/DEFAMATORY BY THE COURT HAS BEEN ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)) | ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER))
Editor’s Note: The law protects and encourages Ripoff Report to make appropriate edits to Reports posted by third parties. Ripoff Report may use that editorial power to post findings from a court of law about the subject matter of Reports. In some cases, a Court may find that specific statements made by the author of a Ripoff Report are false and defamatory. When both sides of a dispute appear and contest the facts of a situation in court it is believed that the findings of the court are generally reliable and fair. Out of respect for the courts and the judicial process, Ripoff Report, upon request, may post that kind of finding with special prominence, and in some cases, may even redact the information specifically identified by the court as false from the original Report. In this instance, the Court Order combined with additional formal court documents received by Ripoff Report was specific enough regarding the statements made, and as such, the offending language has been (((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER))) by Ripoff Report.NOTE:Statements that have not been redacted may not have been specifically outlined in the Court Order and/or may have been considered statements of opinion. It is highly encouraged that consumers conduct their own additional research, from credible sources such as regulating authorities, prior to making any decisions on whether or not to do business with any individual or entity named as the information contained herein, and any negative inference derived from such information, may very well be false and misleading.
NOW TO THE EDITORIALLY REDACTED REPORT:
Don’t let the fact that he beat a 12-year SEC investigation for insider trading fool you. There’s more than meets the eye -- or the SEC scrutiny -- when it comes to Nelson Obus of Wynnefield Capital.
((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER))? ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER))? ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER))?
((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). And by the way, this wasn’t his first ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)), either. There have been a number of others. You think that’s something investors shouldn’t take notice of? You think it’s personal and not something to pay attention to? You think that kind of character, or lack thereof, doesn’t spill over into everyday work activities? Think again. Before you invest any money with ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)) or his company, think long and hard about that and check him out thoroughly.