Print the value of index0
  • Report:  #877784

Complaint Review: Sue Parracino

Sue Parracino Susan D. Parracino, Parracino's Labs, PreciousDoxies Poor Business Practices Mountain View, Arkansas

  • Reported By:
    Anonymous — Arkansas United States of America
  • Submitted:
    Thu, May 03, 2012
  • Updated:
    Thu, September 19, 2013

I was unfortunate enough to trust this breeder and assume we were friends. I gave a female dachshund puppy to this woman at no charge in exchange for a smooth cream female puppy back when the dog was old enough to breed. The dog I gave her had her first litter in January 2012 and there were three puppies, one smooth cream female, two black/cream males (one smooth & one longhair).

This breeder claimed she was not going to give me the only female puppy in the litter and that I could "take 2nd pick" or wait for a future litter. That was not our agreement, it stated specifically that I am to get a smooth cream female puppy out of this dog. There is no guarantee that this dog will ever produce another cream female, smooth female, or even any other female puppies.

In May, this puppy is listed on her website as available to a pet home because she is so tiny, well at 12 weeks of age you can't say that a puppy is too small to breed. She was in a good weigh range for a dachshund puppy. She still says I am not entitled to first pick of this litter, well how does that matter when she has the puppy listed for sale? She has no right to sell any of those puppies from that litter until this is resolved in court, and yes I did file a lawsuit against her.

This woman has very poor business practices, she can't even uphold a contract that she signed. She wanted this dog badly and I thought I was doing her a favor by letting her take her at no charge for a puppy back later. I truly regret that I didn't just keep the puppy myself or place her in a pet home. I should not have made this woman a great deal.

I even offered this woman to just pay for the puppy she got from me since she wanted to keep the smooth cream female so badly, she accepted that and then sent another email shortly after and had changed her mind. We went back and forth many times over this ordeal, I tried to work with her to get this worked out but there is no way to do it without going to court. If it's not her idea or what she wants, it just isn't going to happen in her mind.

I would caution everyone not to do business with this woman in any way, as she is very opportunistic and will get her hand in anything that she sees will give her the best end of the deal. If it doesn't lean more toward her favor, she wont even take a second look.

I truly believe she meant to screw me over ever since she picked up the puppy from my house. She needs to understand that you can't just steal a dog from someone and have litter after litter from that dog without any consequence.

4 Updates & Rebuttals


Anonymous

Conway,
Arkansas,

Charges were dismissed, forgot to post long time ago

#5Author of original report

Thu, September 19, 2013

These charges were falsely accused, the dogs in question were only at my house for less than a week, proof was given from my vet along with paperwork showing when I got the dogs, they were at the vet before coming to my home on the day I got them. Here's the proof that all charges were dismissed.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or contact the district court in faulkner county for further information! Thank you!

I do not spread false accusations, nor do I spread incomplete information without all the details and proof.


Anonymous

Conway,
Arkansas,
United States of America

UPDATE: RESOLVED

#5Author of original report

Thu, May 10, 2012

I am happy to announce that this issue has been resolved. Ms. Parracino and I have worked this out between us, to the satisfaction of both parties. I have been to Ms. Parracino's home and can personally attest the exceptional care that she provides for her dogs. I sincerely regret having prematurely written the original post. I admit that some things were said that shouldn't have been and for that I do apologize. 


Anonymous

Conway,
Arkansas,
United States of America

Slander, above statement is FALSE

#5Author of original report

Fri, May 04, 2012

Mrs. McCarther has never been convicted of Animal Cruelty in any county or state. The above allegations made by Ms Parracino are false and will be handled in court as slander.


Sue / Susan

Mountain View,
Arkansas,
United States of America

Mrs. Elizabeth McCarther, Cranberry Dachshunds...Animal Cruelty!!!

#5REBUTTAL Individual responds

Fri, May 04, 2012

I do not usually dignify such a comment, with a response,
however I will make an exception in this case!

First and most importantly, there are two sides to every story!  Talk is
cheap and is not always accurate, and usually does not give the FULL
TRUTH!  Inquire for yourself versus listening to others!

There are many reasons as to why Mrs. McCarther will NOT receive this pup,
reasons that I would be most willing to discuss with you, if you would like to
give me a call: 870-269-5947.  I will however share this with you, as this
is a matter of PUBLIC RECORD!  I WILL NOT place any pup/dog,
regardless of size, gender, color, or conformation, into Mrs. McCarthers 
care, knowing that in January of 2012, she was found GUILTY on
three counts of ANIMAL CRUELTY, in the Faulkner County District
Court of Arkansas!!  

My reputation as an Honest, Ethical & Responsible Breeder & Show
Exhibitor, speaks for itself!!

If you have any questions, or concerns about me, or my breeding practices, I
encourage & welcome you to contact meI would welcome the opportunity to
set the facts straight!!  Thank You, ~Sue

Respond to this Report!