Complaint Review: TINY DETAILS

First of all, Tiny Details should have offered to refund 50% of her money now, Tiny Details is only getting Technical to hide the facts., As one saying goes: Thousands of people can't be wrong over 1 person"Company" who claims that they are right.

There deposit is $50, but They shouldn't ask for one to have people work for them, Tiny Details says: well, that's to cover our costs, garbage, host etc, I Say BS, because a Real Legit company would ask you to fill out a application, usually over the phone and in return they'll ask for no deposit, I've been scammed before, Luckly my Bank backed me up and gave me a break.

oh yeah, by the way....And here is the Truth right here, Tiny Details says, the $50 is to cover costs etc, so they were planning to keep the $50 it seems!.

I Did Homebased Business research, I Say to anyone who wants to work from home, simple Open a Internet store, research on product sales and needs, Invest as little as $500 and Work with Wholesalers, none of this Hanky Panky Crap, Scammers Suck and we'll still win!.

One of our workers pointed out that this report was on Ripoffreport.com. So I dug back into our files to report the real story.

Omid came to us with a $50 deposit for the materials to make our miniature Canadian Money on July 3, 2003. (Though this product is no longer made, you can see a similar product on our web site at http://www.tinydetails.com/current.asp -- look for the Euro Money toward the middle of the page.) This product, like all of our products, is used by people who collect and display realistic doll houses. Realism is very important to them.

The work involves cutting the money out from the four (not two) letter-size sheets that they are printed on and putting them in plastic bags. There are 24 small bills per bag. You make 100 bags. We pay $50 for that. We estimate that the average person will take 4 to 5 hours to complete this task. Beginners take a little more time, so, Omid's 6 hours is about right.

However, that's where Omid's story and our story begins to differ. Omid says that we told him he "didn't cut the moneies[sic] ritht[sic]". On August 10, when we inspected his work, we wrote exactly this to Omid: "There was white paper showing around the edges of the colored area on the fronts of the miniature. The product that you have cut out is not cut out squarely. Please re-inspect your product and remake any crooked pieces". The inspector attached a few bags that showed this problem to the letter she wrote. This would allow Omid to see precisely what she meant.

The last part of the instructions for making the Canadian Money miniature is a checklist of things to look for to be sure you are making the product correctly. It says: "Your finished product should look like the sample package enclosed. Check these things: 1) It should not have any visible white paper on the front face of each bill. 2) The bills should have straight sides and be rectangles." This is truly a case of black and white. If you see white paper, it's wrong! There was white paper on Omid's Canadian Money. His product did not have straight sides.

So, we sent them back to Omid with the precise comments shown above. Omid was offered any additional materials he needed to complete the work correctly AT NO COST TO HIM.

Omid's reaction was to demand ALL of his money back. At that point, we'd advertized to find him, spoke with him on the phone several times, sent him all the materials, returned them to him to be corrected, and offered to send him more materials, as needed.

When Omid says "i told them give my money back they said no you have to read the policy", the real story is that he demanded all of his money back, period. Our agreement with him was that he would get back all of his money, plus his pay and his postage if he did the work right. Or, he could get half of his money back, at any time for any reason, if he simply returned any unused materials. He chose to do neither. We do not think we will ever find out why.

If you look at it from our point of view, Omid wanted us to take all of the burden for him not being able to do a good job. The fact is that we are a business and we would go out of business if everyone who came along to work for us acted the same way Omid wanted to. We'd have all our expenses and not a thing to show for it.

One of our workers pointed out that this report was on Ripoffreport.com. So I dug back into our files to report the real story.

Omid came to us with a $50 deposit for the materials to make our miniature Canadian Money on July 3, 2003. (Though this product is no longer made, you can see a similar product on our web site at http://www.tinydetails.com/current.asp -- look for the Euro Money toward the middle of the page.) This product, like all of our products, is used by people who collect and display realistic doll houses. Realism is very important to them.

The work involves cutting the money out from the four (not two) letter-size sheets that they are printed on and putting them in plastic bags. There are 24 small bills per bag. You make 100 bags. We pay $50 for that. We estimate that the average person will take 4 to 5 hours to complete this task. Beginners take a little more time, so, Omid's 6 hours is about right.

However, that's where Omid's story and our story begins to differ. Omid says that we told him he "didn't cut the moneies[sic] ritht[sic]". On August 10, when we inspected his work, we wrote exactly this to Omid: "There was white paper showing around the edges of the colored area on the fronts of the miniature. The product that you have cut out is not cut out squarely. Please re-inspect your product and remake any crooked pieces". The inspector attached a few bags that showed this problem to the letter she wrote. This would allow Omid to see precisely what she meant.

The last part of the instructions for making the Canadian Money miniature is a checklist of things to look for to be sure you are making the product correctly. It says: "Your finished product should look like the sample package enclosed. Check these things: 1) It should not have any visible white paper on the front face of each bill. 2) The bills should have straight sides and be rectangles." This is truly a case of black and white. If you see white paper, it's wrong! There was white paper on Omid's Canadian Money. His product did not have straight sides.

So, we sent them back to Omid with the precise comments shown above. Omid was offered any additional materials he needed to complete the work correctly AT NO COST TO HIM.

Omid's reaction was to demand ALL of his money back. At that point, we'd advertized to find him, spoke with him on the phone several times, sent him all the materials, returned them to him to be corrected, and offered to send him more materials, as needed.

When Omid says "i told them give my money back they said no you have to read the policy", the real story is that he demanded all of his money back, period. Our agreement with him was that he would get back all of his money, plus his pay and his postage if he did the work right. Or, he could get half of his money back, at any time for any reason, if he simply returned any unused materials. He chose to do neither. We do not think we will ever find out why.

If you look at it from our point of view, Omid wanted us to take all of the burden for him not being able to do a good job. The fact is that we are a business and we would go out of business if everyone who came along to work for us acted the same way Omid wanted to. We'd have all our expenses and not a thing to show for it.

One of our workers pointed out that this report was on Ripoffreport.com. So I dug back into our files to report the real story.

Omid came to us with a $50 deposit for the materials to make our miniature Canadian Money on July 3, 2003. (Though this product is no longer made, you can see a similar product on our web site at http://www.tinydetails.com/current.asp -- look for the Euro Money toward the middle of the page.) This product, like all of our products, is used by people who collect and display realistic doll houses. Realism is very important to them.

The work involves cutting the money out from the four (not two) letter-size sheets that they are printed on and putting them in plastic bags. There are 24 small bills per bag. You make 100 bags. We pay $50 for that. We estimate that the average person will take 4 to 5 hours to complete this task. Beginners take a little more time, so, Omid's 6 hours is about right.

However, that's where Omid's story and our story begins to differ. Omid says that we told him he "didn't cut the moneies[sic] ritht[sic]". On August 10, when we inspected his work, we wrote exactly this to Omid: "There was white paper showing around the edges of the colored area on the fronts of the miniature. The product that you have cut out is not cut out squarely. Please re-inspect your product and remake any crooked pieces". The inspector attached a few bags that showed this problem to the letter she wrote. This would allow Omid to see precisely what she meant.

The last part of the instructions for making the Canadian Money miniature is a checklist of things to look for to be sure you are making the product correctly. It says: "Your finished product should look like the sample package enclosed. Check these things: 1) It should not have any visible white paper on the front face of each bill. 2) The bills should have straight sides and be rectangles." This is truly a case of black and white. If you see white paper, it's wrong! There was white paper on Omid's Canadian Money. His product did not have straight sides.

So, we sent them back to Omid with the precise comments shown above. Omid was offered any additional materials he needed to complete the work correctly AT NO COST TO HIM.

Omid's reaction was to demand ALL of his money back. At that point, we'd advertized to find him, spoke with him on the phone several times, sent him all the materials, returned them to him to be corrected, and offered to send him more materials, as needed.

When Omid says "i told them give my money back they said no you have to read the policy", the real story is that he demanded all of his money back, period. Our agreement with him was that he would get back all of his money, plus his pay and his postage if he did the work right. Or, he could get half of his money back, at any time for any reason, if he simply returned any unused materials. He chose to do neither. We do not think we will ever find out why.

If you look at it from our point of view, Omid wanted us to take all of the burden for him not being able to do a good job. The fact is that we are a business and we would go out of business if everyone who came along to work for us acted the same way Omid wanted to. We'd have all our expenses and not a thing to show for it.

One of our workers pointed out that this report was on Ripoffreport.com. So I dug back into our files to report the real story.

Omid came to us with a $50 deposit for the materials to make our miniature Canadian Money on July 3, 2003. (Though this product is no longer made, you can see a similar product on our web site at http://www.tinydetails.com/current.asp -- look for the Euro Money toward the middle of the page.) This product, like all of our products, is used by people who collect and display realistic doll houses. Realism is very important to them.

The work involves cutting the money out from the four (not two) letter-size sheets that they are printed on and putting them in plastic bags. There are 24 small bills per bag. You make 100 bags. We pay $50 for that. We estimate that the average person will take 4 to 5 hours to complete this task. Beginners take a little more time, so, Omid's 6 hours is about right.

However, that's where Omid's story and our story begins to differ. Omid says that we told him he "didn't cut the moneies[sic] ritht[sic]". On August 10, when we inspected his work, we wrote exactly this to Omid: "There was white paper showing around the edges of the colored area on the fronts of the miniature. The product that you have cut out is not cut out squarely. Please re-inspect your product and remake any crooked pieces". The inspector attached a few bags that showed this problem to the letter she wrote. This would allow Omid to see precisely what she meant.

The last part of the instructions for making the Canadian Money miniature is a checklist of things to look for to be sure you are making the product correctly. It says: "Your finished product should look like the sample package enclosed. Check these things: 1) It should not have any visible white paper on the front face of each bill. 2) The bills should have straight sides and be rectangles." This is truly a case of black and white. If you see white paper, it's wrong! There was white paper on Omid's Canadian Money. His product did not have straight sides.

So, we sent them back to Omid with the precise comments shown above. Omid was offered any additional materials he needed to complete the work correctly AT NO COST TO HIM.

Omid's reaction was to demand ALL of his money back. At that point, we'd advertized to find him, spoke with him on the phone several times, sent him all the materials, returned them to him to be corrected, and offered to send him more materials, as needed.

When Omid says "i told them give my money back they said no you have to read the policy", the real story is that he demanded all of his money back, period. Our agreement with him was that he would get back all of his money, plus his pay and his postage if he did the work right. Or, he could get half of his money back, at any time for any reason, if he simply returned any unused materials. He chose to do neither. We do not think we will ever find out why.

If you look at it from our point of view, Omid wanted us to take all of the burden for him not being able to do a good job. The fact is that we are a business and we would go out of business if everyone who came along to work for us acted the same way Omid wanted to. We'd have all our expenses and not a thing to show for it.