Print the value of index0
  • Report:  #205550

Complaint Review: True Logic Financial

True Logic Financial, ripoff, bottom of the barrel scrapers that deserve a class action lawsuit. Englewood Colorado

  • Reported By:
    Portage Michigan
  • Submitted:
    Fri, August 11, 2006
  • Updated:
    Fri, August 11, 2006
  • True Logic Financial
    317 Windsor Lane
    Englewood, Colorado
    U.S.A.
  • Phone:
    866-488-4299
  • Category:

My wife started receiving calls from this company on Tuesday July 11, 2006. This company asked for my wife under her maiden name and we tried to be as informative to them as we could we were shocked that this was a collection attempt for a CITIBANK credit card card my wife opened in 1987, believed closed in writing in 1989 and paid off through payments to CITIBANK.

Come to find out from TLF they wanted us to pay $2,100. The next day Wednesday July 12, 2006 it was $2,260. We were then told that the bill was declared delinquent in 1991. We were very skeptical and asked for written proof of such a large debt/bill. We then also contacted a lawyer. We received a bill from TrueLogic Financial dated July 12, 2007 on Monday July 17, 2006 stating the bill being $2,229.16.

Something seemed not quite right. True Logic had many inaccuracies

First of which is that in 1991 we married in October, they had us still living at an apartment that we moved into 2 years after marriage in 1993 and moved from in 1997we have currently lived at our present address since October 24, 1997. Yet they had very little information that a collection agency should have if this were a valid debt. Matter of fact we are disputing this debt and feel this company may be breaking many federal laws. Have sent complaints to Colorado Attorney General/Collection Agnecy board and the Better Business Bureau.

We never received contact from Citibank of such a bill after 1991 the year this bill supposedly was declared Delinquent. I would suspect if this were a true bill, back then, let alone now, Citibank would have wanted payment long ago. Like somewhere in the 15-19 years that this bill supposedly existed. Also keep in mind:

Michigan Statutes of Limitation
Breach of Contract: 6 years, (MCL 600.5807(8).

Breach of Contract for Sale of goods under the UCC: 4 years: including deficiency actions following repossession and sale of goods subject to a security interest, (MCL 440.2725(1).

Judgments: 10 years, but are renewable by action for another 10 years, MCL.600.5809(3).

NOTE: Another state's limitation period may apply check statutes carefully.

Kevin
Portage, Michigan
U.S.A.

1 Updates & Rebuttals


D

-,
Oklahoma,
U.S.A.

Suggestion

#2Consumer Comment

Fri, August 11, 2006

See the thread number 205467 and copy/paste the handly little pleading from a guy named Tom. It's a pleading you can respond with if those bottom feeding dumbasses actually try to sue you. If they do, follow what Tom lines out. It will likely stop em in their tacks. You will likely not hear from them again, as they have a big bag O' nothin'.

sorry, allowing you to give a competitors name would instigate others to just file against their competition, to only come back later to suggest their company your comments on this policy are welcome! CLICK here to see why Rip-off Report, as a matter of policy, deleted either a phone number, link or e-mail address from this Report.

Respond to this Report!