Print the value of index0
TVC Pro-Driver, Inc Professional "fake" Drivers Legal Assistance Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
I am absolutely uncomfortable with the TVC way to resolve my driver issues.
Any ticket will cost to me more than just the fine:
It will raise my insurance rate,
It will put points in the my driver license, and also
It will affect my actual and future jobs.
At any situation until now, the attorney got from TVC to help me to resolve the incidents where I were involved, offered a bad representation.
The first time, a NY Police Officer said that he saw (as per the traffic ticket) a RED TRUCK passes a red light, ok fine.
But, MY TRUCK is DARK BLUE colored, NOT RED.
Your attorney accepts a negotiation and I was found guilty on that incident.
I do not know the name of the lawyer who supposedly represents me in court.
At the second case, I was charged to run 81/55 speed zone.
That is IMPOSSIBLE, because MY TRUCK HAS AN ENGINE SPEED LIMITER THAT DOES NOT LET IT RUN HIGHLY THAN 70 mph, precisely to avoid such kind of incidents.
Anyway, incomprehensibly I was found guilty to run at 81 mph (?).
I received the resolution from this last case directly from the lawyer. This communication shows 3 hard issues, to me.
1. Mr. Bettis says:
You owe a fine of $ 323.00 for the speeding charge. This fine is due by July 13, 2012. Please send your check or money order directly to the Court.
Failure to pay the fine could result in suspension of your license.
Mr. Bettis has in his own files a copy of my Money Order sent to the Court on 06/06/2011 in the amount of $ 329.- as per his own instructions, it was a previous condition to my (his) first appear.
Did Mr. Bettis look and read my file before go to the Court? I doubt that Mr. Bettis had seen my documents, statements and paper works; either did not show them to the Judge.
2. If Mr. Bettis were specialist attorney in driving traffic violations of CDL drivers, the first thing he should do, was to clarify the 3 first points of this letter, to The Court and to us. He didnt and now I must pay another lawyer, to do this.
3. But more irregular at all, is who sign the letter sent to me. NOBODY SIGN IT.
Those issues made me to look for Mr. Bettis attorney record.
But, I found that:
I. Mr. Wade P. Bettis IS NOT SPECIALIST IN TRAFFIC TRUCK DRIVER AREA.
II. I found antecedents of serious violation at the Oregon State Bar.
On Dec. 29, 2006, the Oregon Supreme Court filed an opinion finding that LA Grande lawyer Wade P. Bettis, Jr. failed to provide competent representation to a client in violation of DR 6-101(A) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The court suspended Bettis for 30 days. The suspension was effective Feb. 28, 2007.
Bettis was admitted to practice in Oregon in 1972. He had a prior record of formal discipline.
III. Two ratings published in knowing ratting pages are:
The best punctuation is 3.8 in 5 and
The other only 1 in 10 with the recommendation of Extreme Caution.
IV. Most recently posted on November 4, 2011, I got this comments from a client of him.
Did not go over my paperwork thoroughly before we went before the judge. Several errors were discovered by the judge, which delayed the discharge of my case.
All the above creates sufficient evidence to me, to say:
In both cases I was involved did not get a good representation from TVC attorneys, when TVC responsibility is get a good representation, as TVC promise:
The attorneys at TVC Pro-Driver, Inc. specialize in those areas of law most likely to affect individuals just like you. TVC Pro-Driver, Inc. has built a strong reputation for handling traffic violations of their clients ethically and competently through the court of original jurisdiction.
TVC said can help me to find a different attorney to appeal the Court resolution and TVC will pay 25% of the attorney fee and I should pay for the rest.
At any time, I did not get a good representation from the TVC selected attorneys to attend any of my cases.
As consequence of the above I resolve:
1. I WANT TO STOP ANY RELATION BETWEEN ME AND TVC PRO DRIVER, Inc.
2. FROM THIS MOMENT STOP ANY DEBIT AMOUNT TO MY BANK ACCOUNT.
3. FROM TODAY, 6/8/2012 YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED TO DEBIT MY BANK ACCOUNT.
4. I RESERVE TO MYSELF THE RIGHT TO INITIATE ANY FUTURE LEGAL ACTION IT DEEMS APPROPRIATE, TO COMPENSATE THE DAMAGES OCCASIONED BY YOUR MISREPRESENTATION AND ADVICE.