Complaint Review: WALT HOMMERDING Wachovia Securities

pay the child support Walt!

Walt Hommerding was abusive to every woman he ever dated, myself included.

Though he may have never physically HIT all of HIS VICTIMS, he certainly abused

them on other low levels typical of abusers.

This man is a deceiver and cheater/liar.

He poured through the clubs and dating scene for two decades victimizing many

many women lying about being exclusive and then being the biggest pathalogical

liar.

Walt is notorious for using women for money, including taking $2,500 once from me

while I was severly impoverished with our baby to supposedly pay down credit

cards.

Later, I found out that he used the money for a Valentine's Day extravagganza

for another woman named Erica ( and show up to take me out, after dumping her

a*s off on the same night, while we had a baby!)

WALT IS LIKE A BIG PIMP, so it doesn't surprise me that JENNIFER WOULD HAVE

TO SUPPORT THIS LOSER FOR THE REST OF HIS LIFE!!! HA!

It doesn't matter if you are center fold material like myself, or big fat potatoe

chip eating whales like Jennifer.

For WALT, it is only what's in it for himself!

Heads up he will use her money for his own betterment and when that runs out,

leach on to the next unsuspecting fool.

IT IS A GOOD THING THAT THIS WEBSITE WILL NOT REMOVE THE EXPERIENCES

OF HIS FORMER VICTIMS!!!

I was warned TWICE by former women that WALT victimized and was too

young to understand the dynamics of abusive men at 21 years of age.

The one woman in Dallas, Texas name 'Jane' told me he was a psychopath and to

get away from him as fast as I could.

Walt neggated this saying that 'She wanted him back, and was trying to break us

up!"

Then there was poor Linda waiting with baited breath for Walt in Chicago, a

college girlfriend who was conned into thinking she was engaged to Walt while I

was living with Walt and while he was filling out fiance immigration paperwork for

myself.

There are a long string of complaints for Walt Hommerding, whereas, many women

were RIPPED OFF from spending their own money on him for lavish gifts, trips to

Italy and even cash.

BEWARE BEWARE BEWARE!!!!!!

WHERE THERE IS SMOKE, THERE IS FIRE!

WHERE THERE IS SMOKE, THERE ARE MIRRORS!

GOOD THING for WALT and JENNIFER that the ripoff report offers 'restitution' for wrongdoers.

We all wait to see what steps will be taken to remedy the situation and the ripoff report will be first to show it!

Better late than never!

Walt knows where his son is, how to transfer money to him and to stop the

suffering he inflicts daily by the withholding of money. His son is in third year

University and is still dependant on those funds form the arrears and also

the 'stolen and 'missing' college funds promised.

Walt needs to internalize one thing, HIS SON COMES FIRST, according to the

courts, according to society, and according to the mother of his son.

Jennifer can side with Walt, but over my dead body will STEAL my son's

money and call herself the victim.

IT IS MY CONTENTION THAT BOTH JENNIFER AND WALT ARE MORE PREOCCUPPIED

WITH THEIR OWN 'EMBARRASSMENT' THAN THE SUFFERING OF WALT'S SON.

LET IT GO DOWN IN HISTORY AND LET IT BE ENGRAVED IN STONE, AND WHY

NOT???

THESE PEOPLE ARE WARPED AND HAVE NO SHAME!

IF they were good abiding citizens and parents, we wouldn't be on the RIPOFF

DEAD BEAT DAD FORUM now would we?????

Abused women are often used as scapegoats for the actual flaws of the

abuser/deadbeat dad in a very TRANSPARENT SPINMASTER ATTEMPT to refute

accountibility.

YOUR PREOCCUPATION WITH WALT'S embarrassment is evident here, but moreso

speaks volumes of enabler and abuser mentality that you are MORE concerned with

a website that depicts the truth, that cannot be ERASED of SAID TRUTH,

RATHER than the SCARS of such horrific infliction of suffering on two human

beings lives that bear suffering by the hands of WALT that cannot EVER BE

CHANGED;

THE catastrophic, life-altering abuse that he is responsible for that we bear.

Women who are accused of acting crazy, are in direct correlation to crazy MAKING

behaviours of the abuser.

UNLESS OF COURSE YOU WANT TO OPEN YOUR CHECK BOOK and PAY FOR WALT,

DO NOT SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE DEADBEAT.

NOTHING IS STOPPING WALT FROM PAYING THE SUPPORT THAN HIMSELF.

THE ORDER IS ALREADY IN PLACE.

NOW be a good buddy and escort the spineless coward to the fing bank and

make a deposit, IS ALL!

THE GOOD MAN OF YOUR'S IS THE BAD MAN OF MINE, SO WHO IS RIGHT????

Your explanation regarding your departure from the USA is something unacceptable given what you're asking for. In fact, it sounds really fake. If you REALLY want what it is you're asking for, you need to come back, take up residence in the state, and fight for it. If you can't do that - you're wasting your time. It's not a matter of being inhuman; it's a matter of getting what you think you deserve. If you think typing behind a computer is the only way of getting back at him - please know it's weak and ineffectual. Your complaints come off as very weak and meritless - moreover, California is a state where someone in your position would have a field day picking his bones clean if he is hiding money in anyway. Even more alarming is that your complaints make you appear to be a stalker. This guy could be very nice to the next person he's with, show how he's been hurt by a crazy woman, and then show him the evidence from all your posts, and the site doesn't remove any posts. No woman would doubt his story because you come off as unbalanced.

You do have a problem in going after the new girlfriend or wife and if you do take them to court, they may be able to get sanctions against you for all of the harmful things said, and then use your posts here as evidence - again none of the posts can ever be removed. The truth is, if she wishes to support him, that's her business and you're not entitled to anything from that support. It's his choice whether to ignore his son or any child of his for that matter. You're trying to emotionally draw people in - your emotional plea has no merit in this or any case.

SLANDER AND LIBELS'S BEST DEFENSE IS THE TRUTH, SO BE CAREFUL ABOUT

ACCUSING SOMEONE BEING A LIAR (ABOUT THE TRUTH OF BOTH WALT AND

JENNIFER) AS IN DOING SO, ONCE PROOF IS BROUGHT TO THE FOREFRONT COULD

CAUSE YOUR OWN DEFAMATION LAWSUIT.

WE DO NOT WANT JENNIFER'S MONEY, WE WANT WALT'S MONEY THAT HE

SPENDS ON HER, and NOT HIS SON.

IRONICALLY, ALL OF HER MONEY WILL BE SPENT TO MAINTAIN THEIR USUAL

HOUSEHOLD DEBT, BECAUSE WALT WILL SOON HAVE GUARNISHMENTS AND LIENS

ON HIS INCOME GOING FORWARD AND ASSETS BROUGHT INTO THEIR MARRIAGE

BELONGING TO THE MOTHER OF WALT"S SON.

PLUS, THE INHERITANCE RIGHTS AFTER THE PATERNITY TEST THAT WAS TAKEN

IS ENTERED INTO THE COURTS FOR PURPOSES OF RIGHTFUL INHERENTANCE.

ONCE THE SHERRIFF GETS WIND OF THE ORDER
PULL UP TO WALT'S (LEESA'S EQUITY) and TAKE OUT ALL BELONGINGS AND PUT

THEM UP FOR AUCTION.

THERE WILL BE A PETITION FOR MISAPPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR THE DIAMOND

RING, AS BOTH WALT AND JENNIFER KNEW OF THE OBLIGATION PRIOR TO IT'S

PURCHASE. THIS IS AN ASSET of WALT'S BASED ON STOLEN MONEY.


IRONIC THAT HALF THE WEDDING GIFTS BELONG TO HIM AND ARE NOW ASSETS.

WAKE UP FORM YOUR FAIRYTALE SLEEPING STUNNED BEAUTY!

In regards to the above comments from vampires pretending to be human...

WALT owes the MOTHER of his son the arrrears, as she carried the entire financial

load of the needs for their son.

It is his portion that Walt is indebted to the mother who had sole physical

custody. Walt's portion WAS given to his son, but not from WALT's income, to the

detriment of the mother of Walt's son (because she wouldnt have her son go

without.) He owes her the money she paid for Walt's slack and he owes her

respect for carrying his 50% of parentage.

Whatever Walt chooses to give to his son after 18 is on his own merit, god help

him after all of the rejection for twenty years he will continue to make his son

suffer!

He had also promised the mother of his son, higher education expenses and years

ago said he had an account for an educational savings plan including taking his

son's SSN to open said account.

THIS HAS EVRYTHING TO DO WITH JENNIFER CUMMINGS, and she will be charged

criminally because she has INTERFERRED with the retrieval of said arrears, and

by spending money that belonged to the mother of Walt's son and his son's

university savings during the course of Walt's said 'courting' of her, including

wedding expenses and sheer ACCEPTANCE of a diamond ring with money that

should have been delegated accordingly. Activity reports of spending portray a

woman with materialism habits beyond the scope of Walt's budget and income. He

complained recently that he was broke due to the excessive burdens this

UNVIRTUOUS woman has caused to his finances bleeding every penny in his own

savings for a wedding he could NOT afford. AND THUS USED AS A RECENT EXCUSE

DOCUMENTED TO HIS OWN SON as saying that Jennifer Cummings spent his last bit

of cash...Cash that WOULD HAVE been paid TO HIS SON, if her frivolous wedding

plans weren't forced upon Walt. THIS IS ACCORDING TO WALT based on emails

explaining why he couldnt pay. WALT ALSO SAID THAT JENNIFER'S WEDDING ALSO

INCURRED DEBT TO HER PARENTS AND THAT WALT HAS TO PAY THEM.

THEY DO NOT KNOW OF WALT'S FORMER OBLIGATIONS AND SHOULD NOT RECEIVE

MONIES BEFORE WALT"S SON and will be informed accordingly.

Walt is not allowed to lease vehicles either until all monies of said arrears are paid

in FULL.

The above, including transfering money or lying to withhold monies or any fancy

footwork to transfer, encumber etc. which is being monitored gives her a

partnership in crime of criminal nonsupport. you are a mere stunned c**t and I look

forward to your own stupidity and classless immoral behaviour and land you in jail

alongside my abuser.

But WORSE, knowingly spending the money that does not belong to WALT and

certainly not herself nor her own responsibilities. This has everything to do with

JENNIFER CUMMINGS, as the material gain of their marriage will be reflective of the

liens and guarnishments of all assets. It is close to

a million dollars with a economic crisis, meaning no recovery in sight, for WALT.

AND any money he will earn will be for his son.

DO NOT TRY TO PLAY INNOCENT, as in doing so makes you look ignorant, or

moreso, worse of a snivelling thief -w***e you already are labelled, and engraved

on the ring you wear.

Congratulations, you are the proud new owner of a big pile of steaming s**t of

Walt's that you say doesn't stink.

See you in court, if you have the gutts to show your scoundrel face, w***e-thief!!

I did file federal and state tax returns. What I meant was that there was no requirement to file annual income/wealth statements to any court or government agency as regards child support.

First of all, I think you should be careful when making comments about his wife. She is in NO WAY obligated to provide any funds for any child support; current or in arears. What she does with her money is non of your business and has NO BEARING on your child support issues. Further, you might find yourself on the wrong end of a civil suit; defamation, libel, etc.

Your beef is with the FATHER, and ONLY THE FATHER. Your rants about the wife's spending/shopping habits are irrelevant and of no consequence.

Since your child is 21 years old, your child should SUE for the childsupport that is in arears. Your CHILD is owed any back child support-not you.

If you're really concerned about your "ex whatever" paying the arrearage, then stear your child to an attorney and provide the documents that establish the child support and a full accounting to justify the amount you claim is in arears.

FYI, I obtained a divorce decades ago and paid child support in full and on time. I was NOT required to file annual earning statements with any court or government agency.

Get your child to an attorney.

First of all, I think you should be careful when making comments about his wife. She is in NO WAY obligated to provide any funds for any child support; current or in arears. What she does with her money is non of your business and has NO BEARING on your child support issues. Further, you might find yourself on the wrong end of a civil suit; defamation, libel, etc.

Your beef is with the FATHER, and ONLY THE FATHER. Your rants about the wife's spending/shopping habits are irrelevant and of no consequence.

Since your child is 21 years old, your child should SUE for the childsupport that is in arears. Your CHILD is owed any back child support-not you.

If you're really concerned about your "ex whatever" paying the arrearage, then stear your child to an attorney and provide the documents that establish the child support and a full accounting to justify the amount you claim is in arears.

FYI, I obtained a divorce decades ago and paid child support in full and on time. I was NOT required to file annual earning statements with any court or government agency.

Get your child to an attorney.

First of all, I think you should be careful when making comments about his wife. She is in NO WAY obligated to provide any funds for any child support; current or in arears. What she does with her money is non of your business and has NO BEARING on your child support issues. Further, you might find yourself on the wrong end of a civil suit; defamation, libel, etc.

Your beef is with the FATHER, and ONLY THE FATHER. Your rants about the wife's spending/shopping habits are irrelevant and of no consequence.

Since your child is 21 years old, your child should SUE for the childsupport that is in arears. Your CHILD is owed any back child support-not you.

If you're really concerned about your "ex whatever" paying the arrearage, then stear your child to an attorney and provide the documents that establish the child support and a full accounting to justify the amount you claim is in arears.

FYI, I obtained a divorce decades ago and paid child support in full and on time. I was NOT required to file annual earning statements with any court or government agency.

Get your child to an attorney.

First of all, I think you should be careful when making comments about his wife. She is in NO WAY obligated to provide any funds for any child support; current or in arears. What she does with her money is non of your business and has NO BEARING on your child support issues. Further, you might find yourself on the wrong end of a civil suit; defamation, libel, etc.

Your beef is with the FATHER, and ONLY THE FATHER. Your rants about the wife's spending/shopping habits are irrelevant and of no consequence.

Since your child is 21 years old, your child should SUE for the childsupport that is in arears. Your CHILD is owed any back child support-not you.

If you're really concerned about your "ex whatever" paying the arrearage, then stear your child to an attorney and provide the documents that establish the child support and a full accounting to justify the amount you claim is in arears.

FYI, I obtained a divorce decades ago and paid child support in full and on time. I was NOT required to file annual earning statements with any court or government agency.

Get your child to an attorney.

This couple is OC's biggest farce and biggest tag team of criminal non-support of over a million dollars for twenty years of CHILD SUPPORT.

RATED XXX, for scumbags like Walt Hommerding, his whores and his enabler buddies.

All are stuck in the 80's with misogynistic mentality and strengthening the 'abuser buddy system' so that Walt can continue to get away with not being held accountible for near to a MILLION DOLLARS OF ARREARS of child support and levels of cruelty he should have been convicted of.

Mirror mirror on the wall,
VULGAR is as VULGAR DOES.

Okay, Robert asked some questions of you and I asked some questions of you only to have your rant come back. Robert asked when questions and I asked what questions.

Based on other posts that you have made, you are not an Ex-Wife. You are an Ex-Girlfriend , at best. So I knew my answer but wanted to see if you would continue with this Internet black mail scheme of yours. I have read your allegations here and elswhere until my eyes bleed. They are simply allegations. You expect us to believe you, just because you say it is so. I think that you need to get some help. Legally, if you have any kind of case, there are Lawyers that will take it. Also, spiritually, you need to get that black energy vampire suit cleaned.

Okay, Robert asked some questions of you and I asked some questions of you only to have your rant come back. Robert asked when questions and I asked what questions.

Based on other posts that you have made, you are not an Ex-Wife. You are an Ex-Girlfriend , at best. So I knew my answer but wanted to see if you would continue with this Internet black mail scheme of yours. I have read your allegations here and elswhere until my eyes bleed. They are simply allegations. You expect us to believe you, just because you say it is so. I think that you need to get some help. Legally, if you have any kind of case, there are Lawyers that will take it. Also, spiritually, you need to get that black energy vampire suit cleaned.

Okay, Robert asked some questions of you and I asked some questions of you only to have your rant come back. Robert asked when questions and I asked what questions.

Based on other posts that you have made, you are not an Ex-Wife. You are an Ex-Girlfriend , at best. So I knew my answer but wanted to see if you would continue with this Internet black mail scheme of yours. I have read your allegations here and elswhere until my eyes bleed. They are simply allegations. You expect us to believe you, just because you say it is so. I think that you need to get some help. Legally, if you have any kind of case, there are Lawyers that will take it. Also, spiritually, you need to get that black energy vampire suit cleaned.

Okay, Robert asked some questions of you and I asked some questions of you only to have your rant come back. Robert asked when questions and I asked what questions.

Based on other posts that you have made, you are not an Ex-Wife. You are an Ex-Girlfriend , at best. So I knew my answer but wanted to see if you would continue with this Internet black mail scheme of yours. I have read your allegations here and elswhere until my eyes bleed. They are simply allegations. You expect us to believe you, just because you say it is so. I think that you need to get some help. Legally, if you have any kind of case, there are Lawyers that will take it. Also, spiritually, you need to get that black energy vampire suit cleaned.

Jennifer Cummings planned and carried out a lavish wedding, accepted a diamond ring with University Educational Savings that belonged to a son of her new husband. What that labels her, is an unconsciounable thief!!!

She was VERY WELL AWARE of the many conversations, messages, emails and begging and pleading of both Walt 's x and his son trying to get the money that she is now party to.

Matter of fact, on a MONTHLY basis there were MANY conversations to try to get child support paid OVER AN ENTIRE TWENTY YEAR PERIOD including speaking to PARTNERS and SECRETARIES of WACHOVIA because WALT REFUSED TO PAY.


IGNORANCE OF FACT is no excuse, namely not carrying out due diligence as a full grown woman in this day and age to determine the financial obligations of the very man she now calls her new husband affecting the material gain of their new (snicker) 'marriage.'

Instead of going to Neiman Marcus on a shopping spree or to the many galas donating child support money to other children's charities so you can gloat in the public eye, WHY NOT TAKE A TRIP TO THE OC COURT HOUSE silly bird brain chicklet and get the file OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC.

AND undermining factual inhumane treatment of another woman WHOM you've never met, labels you an ENABLER: adding salt to the wounds that this very violent perpetrator inflicted.
She has every right to discuss and bring that abuse to the forefront, including the abuse and neglect of Walt's own son via the inhumane treatment FOR TWENTY YEARS AND COUNTING.

THE POINT BEING is that the only one who should be going to the courthouse is Walt to update his income based on the court order ALREADY IN PLACE for which he is in BREACH of since 1988 and pay the money he owes.

THE ABUSE IS NOT SEPERATE FROM CHILD SUPPORT, the reasons LEESA fled and the circumstances surrounding, including the fact taht the withholding of child support is deemed abuse within itself in the here and now.

THOSE ARREARS SHOULD BE YOUR CONCERN, NOT HOW BEAUTIFUL SHE IS!
HIS SON SHOULD BE YOUR CONCERN, NOT COVERING THE TRACKS OF A LIAR.

Lastly, you should be more concerned that you married a man who was capable and willfully carried out those inhumane cruel and abusive acts, twenty years ago, fifty years ago, or in his entire lifetime. THe fact that he DID at all is the point you are missing.

YOUR FOCUS LABELS YOU AND THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE DONE NOTHING TO REMEDY THE SITUATION FOR ANYONE INVOLVED HERE, EXCEPT YOURSELF, wearing the diamond ring he paid for with child support money that does not belong to yourself, thus labelling yourself selfish, immoral and classless.

FORGET WHAT OTHERS THINK ABOUT YOU, THINK ABOUT HOW YOU LOOK TO OTHERS!!!!!

STOP CHASTIZING A WOMAN FOR GOING AFTER WHAT SHE IS LEGALLY OWED AND COMPLAINING BECAUSE SHE IS COMPLAINING ABOUT IT!

SORRY TO WAKE YOU FROM YOUR STORYBOOK FANTASY, BUT IF THE SHOE FITS CINDERELLA, WEAR IT.
BIBBITY BOBBITY BOO, the clock now strikes twelve.

So you are an x. X-what? X-Girlfriend? X-Wife? X-Lover? You say in your writing that you have been manipulated but it seems to me that you are trying to push all the buttons. Your statements are as Robert said "one side" of the story. In previous posts you have said that you now reside in Canada and that your son, Jordan is over 21. Don't you think you should have handled this properly years ago ? Perhaps it was handled properly and that would be another side of the story. I do not expect to see truth coming from someone who resorts to this kind of personal attack, when remedies are left available within the Court Sysytem.

I believe that the other side of the story would reveal you,Leesa as the person that you are, obsessive & vulgar. FACT: You have attacked a woman in your piece that you know nothing about and have never met or talked with and you flail and spew outright lies and half truths with no regard for anyone, including yourself.

And now you will hide behind the Abused Woman Cloak, when you have not seen the man in question for 20 years and have never seen his wife. There are abused women out there and they have my heart felt sympathy. You are the abuser here in these posts.

Walt Hommerding threw his x and his newborn son out of the house at 3am on record with the Newport Beach Police in January of 1988. Walt was angry about the new crib purchased on his credit card for his son.

Further to that, he stalked her to the home of a new friend who was helping her and his newborn son.

Walt left a naked photo of her in this man's mailbox of her on her birthday, called that home crying on the telephone screaming obscenities and calling her a s**t for cooking for the man helping her and his baby.

Walt then followed them to the grocery store and in broad daylight, and attacked her at Alberton's in Newport Beach. THere were three unbiased witnesses.

Walt was charged and arrested by the Newport Beach Police in March of 1988.
He then continued to stalk and harrass her including calling her at her new employers after she moved away to Beverly Hills and then broke into her apartment stealing her lingerie.

In Vancouver, police were called to detain him at Vancouver International airport after he had broken down a solid walnut exterior door and then attacked her in the past.
She was subjected to his violence for the four years they were together.

Walt manipulated, bribed and co-erced her to drop the assault charges by offering to buy a case of baby formula and car seat for his son, taking full advantage of her extreme duress (with no monies from him until the DA forced him via the child support order in late 1988.)

This was before domestic laws disallowed the victim to sign such documents releasing the perpetrator.

In lieu of a few hundred dollars, Walt avoided conviction and was never held accountable for any of his violence toward this woman, but still on record with the DA for absolute proof.

There are doctor's reports at Hoag hospital the night he punched her in the stomach at 8 months pregnant.

There are many witnesses with clear recollection with the extreme cruelty and willful exploitation this man subjected her too.

There is a restraining order on record with the courts of OC including the child support order for 30% which was never honored.

With all these acts of violence and abuse that were witnessed by others, I have to ask how often he was ARRESTED and PROSECUTED?

How many times were the police called? How many witnesses stepped forward to make statements to the police?

I'm not being harsh, but in my 50 plus years I've learned that in a situation such as this there are THREE sides to the story: His, hers, and that wavy line down the middle called "the truth."

With all these acts of violence and abuse that were witnessed by others, I have to ask how often he was ARRESTED and PROSECUTED?

How many times were the police called? How many witnesses stepped forward to make statements to the police?

I'm not being harsh, but in my 50 plus years I've learned that in a situation such as this there are THREE sides to the story: His, hers, and that wavy line down the middle called "the truth."

With all these acts of violence and abuse that were witnessed by others, I have to ask how often he was ARRESTED and PROSECUTED?

How many times were the police called? How many witnesses stepped forward to make statements to the police?

I'm not being harsh, but in my 50 plus years I've learned that in a situation such as this there are THREE sides to the story: His, hers, and that wavy line down the middle called "the truth."

With all these acts of violence and abuse that were witnessed by others, I have to ask how often he was ARRESTED and PROSECUTED?

How many times were the police called? How many witnesses stepped forward to make statements to the police?

I'm not being harsh, but in my 50 plus years I've learned that in a situation such as this there are THREE sides to the story: His, hers, and that wavy line down the middle called "the truth."