Print the value of index0
  • Report:  #1035229

Complaint Review: Wendall Wendell Sia Dog Widgets For Less Dogwidgetsforless Billion Johnston

Wendall Wendell Sia Dog Widgets For Less Dogwidgetsforless Billion Johnston Aetertek EliteTek L:iar, Lible, Slander, Bad business man, no ethics, NOT AMERICAN Sacramento, California

  • Reported By:
    Consumer — Rio Grande New Jersey
  • Submitted:
    Sat, March 16, 2013
  • Updated:
    Wed, April 06, 2016
  • Wendall Wendell Sia Dog Widgets For Less Dogwidgetsforless Billion Johnston
    2971 Muttonbird Way
    Sacramento, California
    United States of America
  • Phone:
  • Category:

Wendell Sia likes to constantly slander us, Billion and Jodi Johnston, but if you notice- he can substantiate NOTHING he says. WE still own the trademark, a year after Wendall launched all his lies about how we stole it. Why? Because it belongs to US legally, and always will.

In fact, Wendell Sia was never able to do anything without copying our techniques. He stole our pictures, using them for his sales. He stole our marketing techniques, using them to make money. Now that he cannot copy us, he has a low class, failing business because the only way he can make money is to lie and steal from others.

Wendell Sia is a failure as a business man, and he is non American.

Check for yourself! Do we still own the trademark for Elite-Tek? Of course we do. Were we able to shut down EVERY website in the United States who stole our trademark? Of course we were, legally. Because Wendell is a little weenie of a man, all he could do is live in a pretend world, telling lies, trying to explain why his broken products that really weren't Elite Tek, but using a stolen tradename, weren't his problem. Well, Wendell. Our attorney says what you are saying about us is LIBLE and SLANDER. So, we will see you in court soon. We like that house you own, we hope to get a lien on it once we win in court. OUR TURN!

1 Updates & Rebuttals


Billion

Washington,
Utah,
USA

The Truth. The U.S. Trademark Board's Final Decision

#2REBUTTAL Owner of company

Wed, April 06, 2016

It has taken a while, but The United States Patent and Trademark Office has issued a judgment in the case 92055408.  

After years of testimony and many pages of evidence, as of April 2016, the Board states "Petitioner has failed to submit any evidence to support its claims", "the petition to cancel is dismissed with prejudice".  Which means that my company has proven it is the rightful owner of the trademark in question, and their harassing attempt to steal it from me was unsuccessful.  

I submit to this report that all of their other malicious claims are likewise unfounded. 

Respond to this Report!