Wayne
Saint Petersburg,#2UPDATE Employee
Thu, June 05, 2008
This merchant had a valid Merchant Agreement, and used the associated equipemnt for over three years. The national company of her company, required their merchants to convert to a national credit card program. The agreement clearly states, that should the merchant terminate the agreement, they are responsible for the return of the equipment. After repeated attempts to have the merchant return the equipment, per the agreeement, she was charged $500.00. Had the mechant not deceided to keep equipment not belonging to her, this charge would not have occurred. Finally, this charge is made on behalf of the individual investor who owns the equipment the merchant was provided. The 500.00 allows the investor to purchase replacement equipment.