Complaint Review: Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority FCAA. Vice-Chairman J. Paul Robinson along with McDougall Gauley's Gordon Hamilton and FCAA Board Pete Carton - regina Saskatchewan

Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority, formerly the Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission Vice-Chairman J. Paul Robinson, along with McDougall Gauley's Gordon Hamilton and FCAA Board Member Peter Carton, formerly the Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission Vice-Chairman J. Paul Robinson, along with McDougall Gauley's Gordon Hamilton and FCAA Board Member Peter Carton will NEVER hand down a fair decision as this FCAA Hearing Panel has been bias, if not nearly corrupt against the Defendants since 2010.

 Lets look at the facts:

a) in 2010 these three set down a hearing knowing zero disclosure and no witness list was turned over to the defendants.

b) the defendants asked and begged for full disclosure over 100 times in a 4 year period and still to this day did not get it. As a matter of fact, it was brought to this three man panel's attention that the FCAA directors (Ed Rodonets or Kenneth Edward Rodonets, Sandy Novak and Sonne Udemgba) committed criminal actions of perjury, destruciton of evidence, intentional withholding of evidence and attempting to obstruct justice. We are sure that this three man panel is debating on how to make this "criminal" action of the FCAA go away or be swept under the rug, before they would ever admit its existence. Even if they deny it, it will come out. This panel HAS to make an answer on the SOLID, undiseputable evidenec before them that proeves with out a doubt that FCAA Novak, FCAA rodonetns and FCAA udemgba all committed very serious criminla offenses, not just once, but over and over again, year after year, agaisnt the Defendants. This is what we believe it taking the time of the panel in their decision for one can try to sweep criminal actitiviyt udner the rug, that that would come back to bitem them hard at appeal.

c) these three panel members also asked the defendants doctor to break the law and illegally release medical information and files. The doctor did not comply.

d) the defendants asked for 33 defense witnesses, they got three for this panel--and only 2 took the stand before this panel shut down the hearing without letting the defense complete their full answer as guaranteed to them by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

e) the panel  allowed Sonne Udemgba's and the FCAA's out-of-town guests to submit their testimony via video-conference, yet they would not allow the defense this same opportunity and told the defense that they would have to fly in and accomodate their out-of-town witnesses.

f) for preliminary motions, the defense had a pre-approved witness list which was approved boht by the government and the panel and when it came time to call a witness from this pre-approved list, the defense was denied this and not provided any reason, yet the opposing side got to call all of theirs

g) the panel made up false and fraudulent medical stories and scenarios about the defendant and then published and then chastised her in public about these made up fraudulent medical stories that they created

h) this panel may have illegally interfered in the defendants proceedings with the false and fraudulent stories they created

i) Gordon Hamilton made up a lie that the defendant attempted to directly contact Sue Barber, a senior law partner at McDougall Gauley, when this just did not happen. When Gordon was asked for proof of this made-up story he scolded the defendant and basically told her to get lost. he never did provide proof, and that is because this did not happen and Hamilton made it up for the Defendant has never in her life, attempted to contact Susan Barber, of McDougall Gauley, directly.

j) They denied the defendant her full answer to her defense. This three man panel pulled the plug midway through the defendant’s defense and denied her to put her financial evidence on record so this panel is SOLELY making their decision on just ONE SIDE's (FCAA) completed testimony and evidence. Everyone should know this for when that "guilty" verdict gets handed down, you, as the public will know that the decision was based on just one's sides financial evidence being allowed on record. The Defendants was denied her full answer.

k) the defendant submitted solid proof that the FCAA directors and staff involved in the investigation and hearing committed serious criminal acts against the defendants, why do you think the rest of the Hearing was "closed off from the public"? When the govt was bashing the defendant, it was all open and public, but when the defendant presented the truth that exposed the corruption and criminal activity of all FCAA staff and directors involved in these proceedings, that is all "hush-hush" and I guess, not an important public matter like how defaming the defendant was.

l) this three man panel chose to conduct this hearing while the respondent was in the hospital, thereby missing her ability to cross examine JUST at that point in time and Hovern not all together. SO when the defendant returned back to the hearing upon medical specialists confirmiation, she immediately wanted the chance to cross examine many FCAA witness of which she was flat out denied and not given any legal grounds or basis for this denial for her to cross examine.

So everyone remember these points when you read the verdict that is being handed down. We speak the truth and this is just the beginning of what is to come.

NOTE: I am not a named party in these proceedings, nor am I an employee of the government. I have spent time with the Defendants, and a lot of it recently and reviewed, in detail, both side’s evidence and exhibits so I speak with knowledge and can assure you that the Defendants were railroaded when it came to this FCAA investigation and Hearing. Novak is already gone and we believe that Rodonets and Udemgba should be soon gone if there is any sembelance of ethics in this FCAA division.