Joel
Canoga Park,#2Consumer Comment
Tue, June 07, 2011
The settlement is unfair. It just removes 10% of the inventory for a credit reduction of 2% at a few
over priced resorts. The settlement is far worse than what we had. Say good by to Bonus time.
Please send this letter to Gerhart Gebbs class action attorneys.
To: Jonathan Levine or Elizabeth Pritzker
Girard Gibbs LLP
601 California Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, CA 94108
Re: Wixon v. Wyndham, Case No. C 07-02361 JSW (BZ)
INSERT YOUR NAME HERE (both names if two owners)
INSERT STREET ADDRESS HERE
INSERT TOWN, STATE, ZIP
INSERT PHONE NUMBER HERE
WM owner# INSERT OWNER NUMBER HERE
I am respectfully asking to be excluded from this settlement.
To Whom It May Concern:
I wish to be excluded from the settlement because I do NOT think it is
in the best interest of the owners. I think relative use value is too
important a concept for preserving owner value and this settlement does
nothing to enforce the concept both as I read it in the declaration and
as it was sold to me.
I bought this timeshare for the long term value it offered me, with the
intent to leave it to my children. Anything other than adherence to
relative use value will nullify the long term value of my purchaseand I
wouldnt have bought it.
I am truly sorry that the current economy does not support Wyndhams
ability to make the type of profit that they might want or needbut that
is not my problem. There are many developers who have gone under or
dissolved their businesses because it is simply not supportable for them
to continue. Marriott is getting out of timeshares because its just
not working for them anymore. Wyndham should not be allowed to continue
their venture at the expense of owners and in defiance of our documents
simply because they dont want to admit that this particular boat has
sailed. Its not the fault of the owners that perhaps they shouldnt
have purchased Trendwest without looking at their legal options for
change.
This settlement is not representative of my voice, nor do I feel that it
addresses Wyndhams improprieties with regard to WorldMark development.
As it stands, it would give Wyndham the ability to nullify the long
term value of my purchase, and that is something I simply cant support.
Signed: ____________________________________________
Signed: ____________________________________________