Jim
Anaheim,#2Consumer Comment
Fri, January 04, 2008
It doesn't get any simpler than that. If the debt was incurred by a minor, the contract is not enforcable against the minor, but it will be on the parent of the minor. The collection company is right to pursue you now for the $42.62. Your credit can then be dinged as well as your minor child. That's a bad way to go. $42.62 is not a huge amount, though as you said, it could have been better used. This is something your child should learn first-hand; there is a lesson here to be learned by a 16-year old and the lesson is NOT - gee, I'm a minor so I can walk away from my obligations.
Nicole
Sitka,#3Consumer Comment
Fri, January 04, 2008
Lets take the bank out of it: If you told your son that he was not allowed to go out with his friends on Friday night, but he went out anyway and ended up smashing a car window (even by accident), you would be held responsible. Not criminally, but civilly. It is the same with the bank. Under most (if not all) state laws, the parent is responsible for a minor's actions. That means that, since they cannot make HIM pay it, they will make YOU pay it. I suggest that YOU make HIM pay it. If he doesn't have a job, now is the time to get one. It is also the time to teach him that just because he disputes a charge, does NOT mean he can just walk away from it. As well as teach him a little about banking and responsibility. Yes, the bank neglected to use OD protection, but YOUR SON neglected to spend only the money he had in his account. I know its hard, but now is the time for tough love. Even though they cannot make him pay it, they CAN (and probably already have) reported it to his credit report. It would be a shame to start off with the wrong foot, don't you think. Best of luck. And no, I don't work for a bank.