Davis
Enterprise,#2Consumer Comment
Sat, September 07, 2013
Anyone who knows Lynn Harper knows that this report is absolutely ridiculous. I purchased a beautiful puppy from her in April of 2013. I had the opportunity to visit her home, tour her facilities and see how all of the puppies and their sires and dams are cared for. Ms. Harper goes out of her way to make sure that she puts all of her puppies into good homes, and offers to take them back at any time if they are no longer wanted. She retires her sires and dams at a reasonable age, and works diligently to find them good happy homes to live out the rest of their lives.
She obviously has an emotional attachment to each and every puppy and dog in her care, and I cannot imagine for one second her telling someone that she didn't care about the health of a puppy sold to them. In fact, she encouraged me to inform her if there were ever any issues because it is important for a breeder to know the health history of the blood lines. My pup is now a beautiful and healthy five month old, and I would recommend Mrs. Harper's pups without reservation to any family member or friend in search of a new furry family member.
Gerry
United States of America#3Consumer Comment
Wed, December 08, 2010
I have no idea why anyone would write such a report on Lynn Harper. I know her personally and she is of the utmost good character, loves her animals and would never sell a sick puppy to anyone. I feel this report was written by someone Lynn turned down when she wanted to buy a puppy. In other words, a revenge report.
You may rest assured any puppy bought from Lynn will have had the very best of care.
Be very careful when you read a character assination such as the original report written by someone "you know nothing about".
Devilsadvocate4education*just My Opinions*
Las Vegas,#4Consumer Comment
Thu, February 12, 2009
Why are you the only person complaining about these people? I know you filed at least 2 others. In 382979 this 'friend', comes to their rescue apparently? And in 380734? Except, the friend and the complainer seem to be the same person? Just thought I'd summarize some of this long and winding road for anyone actually reading this. 382979- Was filed on 10/20/08 is pretty short. Most of the 'talking' is on 380734. But, oops, exact same report is posted by the person ADMITTING to be June in the other report. In 380734, the poster is 'Not Satisfied" in Birmingham, filed 10/13/08 (we never see her again in this report). Breeder comes in, says this is June posting, they are having problems with her. Stop Puppy Mills in Birmingham comes in and speaks as a poster 'Bernadette' (and you actually typed it like that). THEN, June comes in and says the report is completely false, and please forgive her friend(this seems like a tactic to avoid suspicion to me, but it obviously didn't work, as apparently June was already causing major headaches for this breeder, and was the ONLY suspect). SPM then goes on to post about what they (breeder) have said about June, and requesting proof that June wrote this report. Breeder responds to June. SPM, responds to their talk to June, as June, proving she IS June, and in one post says she is sorry, and apologizes, and asks for forgiveness. Breeder pretty much says not sure they believe this, because of all the aliases used to try to cause trouble for them. They want it ALL to stop (there has been talk of legal action throughout here). SPM/June, then goes off again, mentions a report about someone else (is there a pattern here? What a surprise, another doxy breeder, and a different name.), 279438 (there are 2). Original post on 10/18/07. 3 more that same day. One on the 21st. And one on 2/4/08. There is only one poster for the 6 postings. Saying pretty much the same over and over. Reminds me of someone else in Alabama/Georgia, LOL. Says they can not PROVE she filed the OP, except she seems to forget she just said (implied) she was sorry and would work on taking down all her false reports on these people. She doesn't seem to realize she responds on ONE name as both 'Bernadette' AND June. She doesn't seem to realize she has posted the SAME report, under the SPM alias that she has admitted is her. As I follow all the information provided by those whom have actually had dealing with this June person, it seems she likes to cause trouble. And she has a difficult time telling the truth. Gee, I can't possibly see why they refused to sell her one of their puppies (VERY sarcastic). And she apparently had/has aspirations to become a breeder?????? I don't see any other reports on them. I did notify the breeder that there has been yet another report filed on them. The SAME one. And no, new ones wouldn't be very credible at this point. Yes, some of us pay attention and don't take these reports at face value, make an attempt to get to the truth of things. The report left several questions in the first place, and didn't really have the ring of truth, but the tune of "I'm angry, and out to harm", was clearly there. Why would your 'friend' not file her own multiple reports anyways (please note, it was already admitted this is a lie, so why post it again)? All your apparent lies and aliases have my head spinning. *just my opinions*
Devilsadvocate4education*just My Opinions*
Las Vegas,#5Consumer Comment
Thu, February 12, 2009
Why are you the only person complaining about these people? I know you filed at least 2 others. In 382979 this 'friend', comes to their rescue apparently? And in 380734? Except, the friend and the complainer seem to be the same person? Just thought I'd summarize some of this long and winding road for anyone actually reading this. 382979- Was filed on 10/20/08 is pretty short. Most of the 'talking' is on 380734. But, oops, exact same report is posted by the person ADMITTING to be June in the other report. In 380734, the poster is 'Not Satisfied" in Birmingham, filed 10/13/08 (we never see her again in this report). Breeder comes in, says this is June posting, they are having problems with her. Stop Puppy Mills in Birmingham comes in and speaks as a poster 'Bernadette' (and you actually typed it like that). THEN, June comes in and says the report is completely false, and please forgive her friend(this seems like a tactic to avoid suspicion to me, but it obviously didn't work, as apparently June was already causing major headaches for this breeder, and was the ONLY suspect). SPM then goes on to post about what they (breeder) have said about June, and requesting proof that June wrote this report. Breeder responds to June. SPM, responds to their talk to June, as June, proving she IS June, and in one post says she is sorry, and apologizes, and asks for forgiveness. Breeder pretty much says not sure they believe this, because of all the aliases used to try to cause trouble for them. They want it ALL to stop (there has been talk of legal action throughout here). SPM/June, then goes off again, mentions a report about someone else (is there a pattern here? What a surprise, another doxy breeder, and a different name.), 279438 (there are 2). Original post on 10/18/07. 3 more that same day. One on the 21st. And one on 2/4/08. There is only one poster for the 6 postings. Saying pretty much the same over and over. Reminds me of someone else in Alabama/Georgia, LOL. Says they can not PROVE she filed the OP, except she seems to forget she just said (implied) she was sorry and would work on taking down all her false reports on these people. She doesn't seem to realize she responds on ONE name as both 'Bernadette' AND June. She doesn't seem to realize she has posted the SAME report, under the SPM alias that she has admitted is her. As I follow all the information provided by those whom have actually had dealing with this June person, it seems she likes to cause trouble. And she has a difficult time telling the truth. Gee, I can't possibly see why they refused to sell her one of their puppies (VERY sarcastic). And she apparently had/has aspirations to become a breeder?????? I don't see any other reports on them. I did notify the breeder that there has been yet another report filed on them. The SAME one. And no, new ones wouldn't be very credible at this point. Yes, some of us pay attention and don't take these reports at face value, make an attempt to get to the truth of things. The report left several questions in the first place, and didn't really have the ring of truth, but the tune of "I'm angry, and out to harm", was clearly there. Why would your 'friend' not file her own multiple reports anyways (please note, it was already admitted this is a lie, so why post it again)? All your apparent lies and aliases have my head spinning. *just my opinions*
Devilsadvocate4education*just My Opinions*
Las Vegas,#6Consumer Comment
Thu, February 12, 2009
Why are you the only person complaining about these people? I know you filed at least 2 others. In 382979 this 'friend', comes to their rescue apparently? And in 380734? Except, the friend and the complainer seem to be the same person? Just thought I'd summarize some of this long and winding road for anyone actually reading this. 382979- Was filed on 10/20/08 is pretty short. Most of the 'talking' is on 380734. But, oops, exact same report is posted by the person ADMITTING to be June in the other report. In 380734, the poster is 'Not Satisfied" in Birmingham, filed 10/13/08 (we never see her again in this report). Breeder comes in, says this is June posting, they are having problems with her. Stop Puppy Mills in Birmingham comes in and speaks as a poster 'Bernadette' (and you actually typed it like that). THEN, June comes in and says the report is completely false, and please forgive her friend(this seems like a tactic to avoid suspicion to me, but it obviously didn't work, as apparently June was already causing major headaches for this breeder, and was the ONLY suspect). SPM then goes on to post about what they (breeder) have said about June, and requesting proof that June wrote this report. Breeder responds to June. SPM, responds to their talk to June, as June, proving she IS June, and in one post says she is sorry, and apologizes, and asks for forgiveness. Breeder pretty much says not sure they believe this, because of all the aliases used to try to cause trouble for them. They want it ALL to stop (there has been talk of legal action throughout here). SPM/June, then goes off again, mentions a report about someone else (is there a pattern here? What a surprise, another doxy breeder, and a different name.), 279438 (there are 2). Original post on 10/18/07. 3 more that same day. One on the 21st. And one on 2/4/08. There is only one poster for the 6 postings. Saying pretty much the same over and over. Reminds me of someone else in Alabama/Georgia, LOL. Says they can not PROVE she filed the OP, except she seems to forget she just said (implied) she was sorry and would work on taking down all her false reports on these people. She doesn't seem to realize she responds on ONE name as both 'Bernadette' AND June. She doesn't seem to realize she has posted the SAME report, under the SPM alias that she has admitted is her. As I follow all the information provided by those whom have actually had dealing with this June person, it seems she likes to cause trouble. And she has a difficult time telling the truth. Gee, I can't possibly see why they refused to sell her one of their puppies (VERY sarcastic). And she apparently had/has aspirations to become a breeder?????? I don't see any other reports on them. I did notify the breeder that there has been yet another report filed on them. The SAME one. And no, new ones wouldn't be very credible at this point. Yes, some of us pay attention and don't take these reports at face value, make an attempt to get to the truth of things. The report left several questions in the first place, and didn't really have the ring of truth, but the tune of "I'm angry, and out to harm", was clearly there. Why would your 'friend' not file her own multiple reports anyways (please note, it was already admitted this is a lie, so why post it again)? All your apparent lies and aliases have my head spinning. *just my opinions*
Not Satisfied
Birmingham,#7Author of original report
Thu, February 12, 2009
http://www.bountifuldachshunds.com