Bartly
Shakopee,#2Consumer Comment
Thu, February 02, 2012
I ran into these guys on the net www.answer-summons.com . The forms worked and made the most sense out of all my research. Not to expensive either.
Stanley
Weslaco,#3Consumer Comment
Thu, February 19, 2009
I am sorry to hear of so much tragedy that has taken control of your emotions, not to mention taken control of your telephone. The person whom you called at the law firm was not, repeat NOT a lawyer. It was a collection agency instead, who represents the law firm. Lawyers don't sit around all day in their plush cozy offices and call clients who are behind on payments, that's a bill collectors's job. If he said he was a lawyer, he was misrepresenting himself as a means to put the fear of God into you. And I can see it worked, because now you're taking out your frustration and anger on Rip Off Report.com. Before practicing law in Minnesota, This Como law firm used to operate in Hidalgo County, Texas, where a representative from the firm, Jesse Benjamin Stoner (AKA J.B. Stoner) was appealing an upheld civil rights case through the Texas Courts of Appeal because a coworker of mine, Rudy Montiel at the pizza delivery where company I worked at, was accused of violating a customers civil rights by sending pizza's with banana toppings only, to an African-American family and charging them double, not just for gas mileage into the housing projects on the outskirts of town, but for the added fruit toppings as well. The problem was, when the pizzas were finally delivered, they were not only the wrong order (banana toppings only) but they were cold. When delivering the pizzas on his round, an updated menu was included with the pizza delivery which included photographs of the new and remodeled dine-in restaurant, where Rudy Montiel was alleged to have told the colored customers that they were only allowed to have pizzas delivered to their front door, as the management "didn't want to see any black folks in the pizza restaurant." J.B. Stoner eventually had the case overturned citing that there was inconclusive evidence to show that his client Rudy Montiel was discouraging business by black customers. I am so glad the Como Law Firm left Texas and have now settled don in Minnesota. Stanley, Weslaco, Texas.
Jim Webb Bail Bonds
Compton,#4UPDATE Employee
Wed, February 18, 2009
I know surprisingly little about Atty. Steve Rosso. I know nothing about his background or lineage. I do not know where Atty. Rosso was educated or what he has done besides exercise both subtlety and thoroughness in managing both the news and the entertainment that gets presented to us. Nevertheless, I can tell you all that you need to know about him. To start, I challenge him to point out any text in this letter that proposes that he is as innocent as a newborn lamb. It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing. Would he like it if I were virulent and cranky, too? I don't think so. It troubles and amazes me to think that Atty. Rosso's claim of fairness is demonstrably false. As long as I live, I will be shouting this truth from rooftops and doing everything I can to provide an atmosphere of mutual respect, free from Fabianism, cannibalism, and all other forms of prejudice and intolerance. Atty. Rosso wants us to emulate the White Queen from Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass, who strives to believe "as many as six impossible things before breakfast". Then again, even the White Queen would have trouble believing that the ancient Egyptians used psychic powers to build the pyramids. I myself prefer to believe things that my experience tells me are true, such as that Atty. Rosso should try being a little more open-minded. The mere mention of that fact guarantees that this letter will never get published in any mass-circulation periodical that Atty. Rosso has any control over. But that's inconsequential because the justification Atty. Rosso gave for turning popinjays loose against us good citizens was one of the most condescending justifications I've ever heard. It was so condescending, in fact, that I will not repeat it here. Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite clearly: Atty. Rosso labels anyone he doesn't like as "headstrong". That might well be a better description of him. Is it just me, or do other people also think that Atty. Rosso always says the most egocentric things? I ask because I'm sick of Atty. Rosso sticking his proboscis into everyone else's business. I'll probably devote a separate letter to that topic alone, but for now, I'll simply summarize by stating that Atty. Rosso holds onto power like the eunuch mandarins of the Forbidden Citysterile obstacles to progress who rob, steal, cheat, and murder. His fantasy is to etiolate his enemies. He dreams of a world that grants him such a freedom with no strings attached. Welcome to the world of exclusionism! In that nightmare world it has long since been forgotten that prudence is no vice. Cowardiceespecially Atty. Rosso's backwards form of itis. My goal for this letter was to strike at the heart of Atty. Steve Rosso's efforts to engulf the world in a dense miasma of animalism. Know that I have done my best while trying always to take the mechanisms, language, ideology, and phraseology for determining what is right and what is wrong out of the hands of Atty. Rosso and his protgs and put them back in the hands of ordinary people. Let an honest history judge.
Arthur
Wylie,#5Consumer Comment
Wed, February 18, 2009
What do a sperm and a laywer have in common? Each has a one-in-a-million chance of becoming a human being. I could feel for you more if you hadn't given the hospital and doctor anonymous status. If you don't mention names you don't help others very much. Then too, why did you give out credit card information to people who are obvious sociopaths who feed off others' misfortune? At least send a cashier's check or money order and do not trust "people" like this with your banking information. I suggest you take the doctor and hospital to small claims court and get the facts on record. Even if you lose, the fact that some action was taken against them will be of some value. If your small claims court is in a different jurisdiction from that of the hospital and doctor, the judge is likely to give you the benefit of the doubt. It might cost you a few bucks, but at least you won't be taking it lying down or should I say bent over?