- Report: #471044
Complaint Review: Doctor Eric Donnenfeld - Rockville Center New York
-
Author Confirmed
Why?
Doctor Eric Donnenfeld
2000 North Village Avenue Rockville Center, 11570 New York, U.S.A.
Phone:
516-766-2519
Web:
N/A
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
Doctor Eric Donnenfeld Be careful your eyes are precious. Rockville Center New York
Eric Donnenfeld Loses $2.5 Million in Malpractice Lawsuit
MARCH 29, 2002
TLC Medial Director of Garden City, Eric Donnenfeld, along with several other surgeons suggests marketing lasik to non-candidates:
"Tell every patient that you perform LASIK. Tell patients who would never be candidates themselves, including cataract patients and patients with chronic or intractable eye disease. Every single patient you see can be a referral source, and may be your best referral source." http://www.revophth.com/1999/july_articles/799%20lasik.htm
One nurse who had cataract surgery with Dr. Donnenfeld, is not likely to provide a positive referral for Dr. Donnenfeld's lasik services:
Article from the New York Law Journal:
VERDICT: $2.5 million
Frances Kavanagh v. Eric Donnenfield, MD., 30138/96
Nassau Supreme
JUSTICE: Thomas P. Phelan
ATTORNEYS: David M. SHearer of Shearer & Essner, L.L. P., Manhattan, for plaintiff;
Angela Fabiano of the Law Offices of Mitchell J. Angel PLLC, Mineola, for Dr. Eric Donnenfeld.
FACTS: On April 12, 1995, Frances Kavanagh, a 68-year-old retired nurse, underwent a cataract extraction by Dr. Eric Donnenfeld at the Mercy Medical Center in Rockville Centre. Ms. Kavanagh claimed that during the administration of anesthesia the doctor injured her left eye. She also claimed that the doctor failed to timely diagnose the injury despite the presence of a vitreous hemorrhage post-operatively.
Ms. Kavanagh further claimed that Dr. Donnenfeld failed to properly treat the post-operative bleeding, resulting in the formation of a macular hole.
Dr. Donnenfeld contended that the post-operative bleeding and the formation of the macular hole were caused by vitreous traction, which was caused by a vitreous wick that resulted from the disruption to the zonules during the cataract extraction. The doctor further claimed that the vitreous traction caused a retinal tear, causing bleeding and the macular hole.
Ms. Kavanagh claimed that she now suffers permanent "finder count" vision in her left eye, and that she is virtually blind in that eye.
DISBURSEMENT: $2.5 million. Breakdown: $1.5 million for past pain and suffering; $1 million for future pain and suffering.
>>
http://www.mylasikstory.com/
Stanley
Freeport, New York
U.S.A.
MARCH 29, 2002
TLC Medial Director of Garden City, Eric Donnenfeld, along with several other surgeons suggests marketing lasik to non-candidates:
"Tell every patient that you perform LASIK. Tell patients who would never be candidates themselves, including cataract patients and patients with chronic or intractable eye disease. Every single patient you see can be a referral source, and may be your best referral source." http://www.revophth.com/1999/july_articles/799%20lasik.htm
One nurse who had cataract surgery with Dr. Donnenfeld, is not likely to provide a positive referral for Dr. Donnenfeld's lasik services:
Article from the New York Law Journal:
VERDICT: $2.5 million
Frances Kavanagh v. Eric Donnenfield, MD., 30138/96
Nassau Supreme
JUSTICE: Thomas P. Phelan
ATTORNEYS: David M. SHearer of Shearer & Essner, L.L. P., Manhattan, for plaintiff;
Angela Fabiano of the Law Offices of Mitchell J. Angel PLLC, Mineola, for Dr. Eric Donnenfeld.
FACTS: On April 12, 1995, Frances Kavanagh, a 68-year-old retired nurse, underwent a cataract extraction by Dr. Eric Donnenfeld at the Mercy Medical Center in Rockville Centre. Ms. Kavanagh claimed that during the administration of anesthesia the doctor injured her left eye. She also claimed that the doctor failed to timely diagnose the injury despite the presence of a vitreous hemorrhage post-operatively.
Ms. Kavanagh further claimed that Dr. Donnenfeld failed to properly treat the post-operative bleeding, resulting in the formation of a macular hole.
Dr. Donnenfeld contended that the post-operative bleeding and the formation of the macular hole were caused by vitreous traction, which was caused by a vitreous wick that resulted from the disruption to the zonules during the cataract extraction. The doctor further claimed that the vitreous traction caused a retinal tear, causing bleeding and the macular hole.
Ms. Kavanagh claimed that she now suffers permanent "finder count" vision in her left eye, and that she is virtually blind in that eye.
DISBURSEMENT: $2.5 million. Breakdown: $1.5 million for past pain and suffering; $1 million for future pain and suffering.
>>
http://www.mylasikstory.com/
Stanley
Freeport, New York
U.S.A.
