Complaint Review: Hoffman Weber Construction - Minneapolis Minnesota

Editor’s Comment: February 4, 2021 -.  Ripoff Report believes in transparency and the more information the better.  In this instance, there has been court action regarding this subject Report.  We believe it important to note that not all Court Orders are alike.  Many court orders are absolutely legitimate and we make no representations about this court order situation.  However, we want our users to be aware that sometimes courts enter orders based upon default which typically means that the defendant didn’t show up.  Sometimes a defendant won’t show up because they didn’t even get notice of the case proceedings in the first place and other times defendants may not show up because they don’t necessarily have the knowledge and/or the financial resources to fight.  Still, in other instances, a defendant may simply appear only to stipulate (settle) the case by agreeing to stipulate to a court order because they are being bullied by the plaintiff and whether what they said was true or not, they just want the matter to go away so they can move on with life and make the plaintiff go away.  Again, we make no representations about this particular court order situation.  We are simply providing you with additional information so that you may be more informed in general and, coupled with any additional research you feel is necessary, may make your own informed decision regarding the validity of this Report (or anything that may be left of it after redaction).  As always, we encourage our readers to do their homework and not just rely on one single source for information.

The Court Order dated January 6, 2021 relating to Hoffman Weber Construction, Inc. v. Joe Lamere, from the District Court of Anoka County, Minnesota, Case No. 02-cv-18-7036 that caused the redaction can be seen here: (https://www.scribd.com/document/493348353/Hoffman-Weber-Construction-Inc-v-Joe-Lamere-Court-Order).

If you are interested in how a post on Ripoff Report was involved in this matter, you can review the case docket indicating where the Initial Compliant was filed on December 28, 2018 here: (https://pa.courts.state.mn.us/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=1626515188)

As of January 6, 2021, it appears that the underlying case is concluded per the court docket, wherein thirty documents have been filed, that may be accessed at Anoka County Online (https://pa.courts.state.mn.us/Search.aspx?ID=200).  Please consider reviewing the entire legal file to gain better understandings of the positions of the parties and how matters are resolved.  We may not update this posting further with any new information and you should seek additional and updated information out on your own if you want to learn more and have a more complete picture.

-----------------------------------------------

(((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER))).  Mike Sample their manager has avoid email contact with me for the most part and (((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER))).(((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER))). (((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER))).

(((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER))). They pay the lowest commission in the industry at 8%. They claim to be this innovative company, (((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER))). (((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER))). (((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER))).  (((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER))). (((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER))).