Bjornson Law Offices
Missoula,#2UPDATE Employee
Fri, June 19, 2009
As the attorney for Ironhaus, we assert this report is a hoax and has been filed by a disgruntled fired former employee. He has just been served with a letter to remove this report or he will be sued for defamation. He falsely alleges what would be criminal behavior, yet no police report has ever been filed by him, though he has relatives in law enforcement. The reporter's illiteracy undermines his credibility, along with his false, fantastical statements. Ironhaus invites any reader to contact them, and come to their shop to view for themselves the highest quality items in their field. We hereby demand that Ripoff remove this report, and all others, as they are demonstrably false and damage the professional and personal reputations of Ironhaus and those involved. A failure by Ripoff to investigate and remove these statements will result in a lawsuit against Ripoff. The federal statute protecting webhosts from suit does not protect the behavior here. The statement of adhesion requiring us to submit to the jurisdiction of the state of Arizona before accepting this rebuttal is objected to as inconsistent with fundamental laws of venue and jurisdiction. The damage to Ironhaus by Ripoff's behavior has occurred in Montana and litigation will be filed in Montana regardless of this statement. Ripoff's practice of requiring submission to Arizona jurisdiction before accepting a rebuttal is actionable itself.
Bjornson Law Offices
Missoula,#3UPDATE Employee
Fri, June 19, 2009
As the attorney for Ironhaus, we assert this report is a hoax and has been filed by a disgruntled fired former employee. He has just been served with a letter to remove this report or he will be sued for defamation. He falsely alleges what would be criminal behavior, yet no police report has ever been filed by him, though he has relatives in law enforcement. The reporter's illiteracy undermines his credibility, along with his false, fantastical statements. Ironhaus invites any reader to contact them, and come to their shop to view for themselves the highest quality items in their field. We hereby demand that Ripoff remove this report, and all others, as they are demonstrably false and damage the professional and personal reputations of Ironhaus and those involved. A failure by Ripoff to investigate and remove these statements will result in a lawsuit against Ripoff. The federal statute protecting webhosts from suit does not protect the behavior here. The statement of adhesion requiring us to submit to the jurisdiction of the state of Arizona before accepting this rebuttal is objected to as inconsistent with fundamental laws of venue and jurisdiction. The damage to Ironhaus by Ripoff's behavior has occurred in Montana and litigation will be filed in Montana regardless of this statement. Ripoff's practice of requiring submission to Arizona jurisdiction before accepting a rebuttal is actionable itself.
Bjornson Law Offices
Missoula,#4UPDATE Employee
Fri, June 19, 2009
As the attorney for Ironhaus, we assert this report is a hoax and has been filed by a disgruntled fired former employee. He has just been served with a letter to remove this report or he will be sued for defamation. He falsely alleges what would be criminal behavior, yet no police report has ever been filed by him, though he has relatives in law enforcement. The reporter's illiteracy undermines his credibility, along with his false, fantastical statements. Ironhaus invites any reader to contact them, and come to their shop to view for themselves the highest quality items in their field. We hereby demand that Ripoff remove this report, and all others, as they are demonstrably false and damage the professional and personal reputations of Ironhaus and those involved. A failure by Ripoff to investigate and remove these statements will result in a lawsuit against Ripoff. The federal statute protecting webhosts from suit does not protect the behavior here. The statement of adhesion requiring us to submit to the jurisdiction of the state of Arizona before accepting this rebuttal is objected to as inconsistent with fundamental laws of venue and jurisdiction. The damage to Ironhaus by Ripoff's behavior has occurred in Montana and litigation will be filed in Montana regardless of this statement. Ripoff's practice of requiring submission to Arizona jurisdiction before accepting a rebuttal is actionable itself.
Bjornson Law Offices
Missoula,#5UPDATE Employee
Fri, June 19, 2009
As the attorney for Ironhaus, we assert this report is a hoax and has been filed by a disgruntled fired former employee. He has just been served with a letter to remove this report or he will be sued for defamation. He falsely alleges what would be criminal behavior, yet no police report has ever been filed by him, though he has relatives in law enforcement. The reporter's illiteracy undermines his credibility, along with his false, fantastical statements. Ironhaus invites any reader to contact them, and come to their shop to view for themselves the highest quality items in their field. We hereby demand that Ripoff remove this report, and all others, as they are demonstrably false and damage the professional and personal reputations of Ironhaus and those involved. A failure by Ripoff to investigate and remove these statements will result in a lawsuit against Ripoff. The federal statute protecting webhosts from suit does not protect the behavior here. The statement of adhesion requiring us to submit to the jurisdiction of the state of Arizona before accepting this rebuttal is objected to as inconsistent with fundamental laws of venue and jurisdiction. The damage to Ironhaus by Ripoff's behavior has occurred in Montana and litigation will be filed in Montana regardless of this statement. Ripoff's practice of requiring submission to Arizona jurisdiction before accepting a rebuttal is actionable itself.