- Report: #230455
Complaint Review: Jim Buckmaster At CRAIGSLIST - San Francisco California
-
Author Confirmed
Why?
Jim Buckmaster At CRAIGSLIST
P.O. Box 225159 San Francisco, 94122-5159 California, U.S.A.
Web:
N/A
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
Jim Buckmaster AKA CRAIGSLIST Violating The Constitutional Rights Under The First Amendment Rights San Francisco CA San Francisco California
Enclosed you will find a Legal Documented Complaint with the ACLU Against CRAIGSLIST.ORG for the willful and wanton acts of Violating The Constitutional Rights Under The " First Amendment Rights " -
Freedom of Press and Speech. (Link) and hereby submit for your consideration the recent U.S. Superior Court Legal Ruling and the
Case Citations: California & Virginia, 448 U.S. 555 (1980),
The Court held that the First Amendment ...
Craigslist Rants and Raves has recently been flooded with intentional despicable bashing and debasing President Bush and the oppositions to the War in Iraq.. These offensive
posts includes George Bush having Anal Intercourse with
bin Laden, and Saadem Hussein, Pres. Georg Bush chewing on the neck of the Statue of Liberty.
Example of Postings thatviolate Craigslist own Terms and Agreements:
Bush Greets the Troops
(Sexually Explict with Terrorist)
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/lac/rnr/261926244.html
On Bush
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/wst/rnr/262304429.html
Bush Bashing
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/lac/rnr/262224665.html
Bush Response (Derogatory)
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/wst/rnr/261920859.html
Imigration (Derogatory)
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/sgv/rnr/262358307.html
Mexican Response (Derogatory)
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/lac/rnr/262338104.html
Sterilize Mexicans
(Derogatory)
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/lac/rnr/262310916.html
Obscene Photo - Violate Craigslist TOS
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/lac/rnr/262323055.html
Craigslist is allowing deliberate violation of their own Term and discriminating against others
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and this is fine. That is why there is the 1st Amendment.
However, when it is violated and an opposite point of view is denied and censored then deleted. This is when there is a direct violation
of the same 1st Amendment right that are afford to some, however, forbidden to other who disagree with anit radical opinion.
My response to CraigsList " Rant and Raves" was not offensive, did not contain any offensive language nor did it have any obscene gesture or photographs in its posting and did not
whatsoever, violate any Term of Agreement of Craigslist.
This was bona fide legitimate response which contained opposite point of view with credible articles and understandable current events which was supported with excerpts from ABC NEWS
CBS NEWS and other world wide resources the obviously contradicted the narrow opinions belonging to of Craiglist Censors, Employees and its radical supporters, who are taking side.
Craigslist should be a neutral Online Forum.
For your convenience this entire responding post is upon request.
Your posting has been flagged down by craigslist users.
Approximately 98% of postings removed by flagging are in violation of craigslist posting guidelines.
Please make sure you are abiding by all posted site rules, including our terms of use:
Gregg
Pacific Palisades, California
U.S.A.
Freedom of Press and Speech. (Link) and hereby submit for your consideration the recent U.S. Superior Court Legal Ruling and the
Case Citations: California & Virginia, 448 U.S. 555 (1980),
The Court held that the First Amendment ...
Craigslist Rants and Raves has recently been flooded with intentional despicable bashing and debasing President Bush and the oppositions to the War in Iraq.. These offensive
posts includes George Bush having Anal Intercourse with
bin Laden, and Saadem Hussein, Pres. Georg Bush chewing on the neck of the Statue of Liberty.
Example of Postings thatviolate Craigslist own Terms and Agreements:
Bush Greets the Troops
(Sexually Explict with Terrorist)
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/lac/rnr/261926244.html
On Bush
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/wst/rnr/262304429.html
Bush Bashing
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/lac/rnr/262224665.html
Bush Response (Derogatory)
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/wst/rnr/261920859.html
Imigration (Derogatory)
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/sgv/rnr/262358307.html
Mexican Response (Derogatory)
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/lac/rnr/262338104.html
Sterilize Mexicans
(Derogatory)
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/lac/rnr/262310916.html
Obscene Photo - Violate Craigslist TOS
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/lac/rnr/262323055.html
Craigslist is allowing deliberate violation of their own Term and discriminating against others
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and this is fine. That is why there is the 1st Amendment.
However, when it is violated and an opposite point of view is denied and censored then deleted. This is when there is a direct violation
of the same 1st Amendment right that are afford to some, however, forbidden to other who disagree with anit radical opinion.
My response to CraigsList " Rant and Raves" was not offensive, did not contain any offensive language nor did it have any obscene gesture or photographs in its posting and did not
whatsoever, violate any Term of Agreement of Craigslist.
This was bona fide legitimate response which contained opposite point of view with credible articles and understandable current events which was supported with excerpts from ABC NEWS
CBS NEWS and other world wide resources the obviously contradicted the narrow opinions belonging to of Craiglist Censors, Employees and its radical supporters, who are taking side.
Craigslist should be a neutral Online Forum.
For your convenience this entire responding post is upon request.
Your posting has been flagged down by craigslist users.
Approximately 98% of postings removed by flagging are in violation of craigslist posting guidelines.
Please make sure you are abiding by all posted site rules, including our terms of use:
Gregg
Pacific Palisades, California
U.S.A.
1 Updates & Rebuttals
L.c.
Colorado Springs,Colorado,
U.S.A.
First Amendment
#2Consumer Comment
Mon, June 16, 2008
You seem to think that a private company is required, under the First Amendment, to present (or allow to be presented) both sides of an issue. This is absolutely not the case. A company or an individual can say whatever they feel like. They have no obligation whatsoever to present the other side. That is the *point* of the First Amendment. If you don't like what a company is saying, or allows to be said, don't deal with them. Or start your own similar company to get your point of view across.
