Gabor
Santa Monica, Ca.,#2UPDATE Employee
Mon, February 18, 2008
As you can see this writer was not able to submit his name to this complaint, therefore it invalidates his claim. The telephone number given for the PUC, will confrm the fact that this company which he writes about is flawless within any governong bodies of the state of California. I have been a driver as well as their bookkeeper for the past twenty years, quite a long time to write this fact that Patricia who is the most ethical person I have ever worked for, has done nothing which is illegle within our tax guidelines. This particular employee, Bela, was fired bacause of his miscalculations with his gratuity with a certain client which he eventually won over to start his own company. The facts are not about taxes but about how he felt gypped since the company was collecting for service fee which was part of their built in hourly rate. This particular driver stated to the client that he never received this revenue which was untrue. He told his client that it was for the state tax which is definitely untrue, this is why HE WAS FIRED!!!
Striderq
Columbia,#3Consumer Comment
Sun, January 13, 2008
As if the taxes you're talking about are correct and should be charged. Ms Stevens would then be liable to pay the taxes to the appropriate agencied since it's her company. Are you saying that she charged these taxes and then didn't pay them? Also most consumers should realize that when they purchase something there's going to be taxes on them. That why when you go to McDonalds and buy three things off the dollar menu you end up paying more than $3 for the food. You go to the store and purchase $30 of merchandise and pay more than $30 at the register. When you rent a vehicle and are quoted $40 per day and you have it two days, you're going to pay more than $80. Some companies will price their services to already include taxes, some will not. As consumers you need to ask all the questions before enterring into a business agreement. Also your math is a little off. The taxes you mention add up to 28% not the 48% you have in your report.
Robert
Irvine,#4Consumer Comment
Sun, January 13, 2008
It sounds as if you are an ex-employee, ex-Independent Contractor, Competitor, or someone with a major issue with this company. By the Way I am not in the Limo Industry, I do not work for or actually have ever heard of this company before. This is just how it is coming out in your report. If you have all of this "proof" and have already talked to the PUC legal department, why have they taken no action on stuff that you say they can confirm? Is it because there is actually nothing there? Why do you need someone on a public web site to have the IRS or a District Attorney contact YOU. With all of this proof you should be able to contact them with no problem. Unless of course your motive is to do more accusations rather than proof.