Complaint Review: Mari Adams Aka Betty Choo - Apache Junction Arizona

To reply to the rebuttal from Mari Adams, oops, I mean "Nancy".... I know that AuthenticLVbags aren't authentic at all, because there are other people on various websites telling of how they took their bag into the Louis Vuitton store and it was deemed FAKE. Other reports from people who have stated that they DID return their FAKE bags to you and their refund was never sent to them. There is another report on AuthenticLVbags right here on Rip-Off report, and if you Google AuthenticLVbags, you will see the various things people are saying about this rip off artist. As I stated in other reports I'm filing warning people about this company, if you see ANYTHING positive written about this company, it is simply the owner, Mari Adams, incognito, posing as a satisfied customer. In fact, I e-mailed Mari one of the reports that I filed yesterday to the contact e-mail address she always sends out [email protected] and low and behold, I got an e-mail back from a 1lollypop123@gmail(dotcom) and she blasted me about how people never read stupid blogs, and she knew all about my order, stated all sorts of facts about it. Proof that she goes by other names. Sounds to me, "Nancy," like "thou doest protest too much." I like the way you go over my report with a fine tooth comb and then at the end couldn't resist mentioning that you 'care' about this cause you bought a bag from there and (of course) IT was authentic. Just a concerned citizen?? I think not, just a concerned THIEF that her company practices are FINALLY being brought to light? I think so.

I believe "Peasy" as had a money disagreement or mishap with AuthenticLVBags.com or the postal service, but that she's taken this as an excuse to slander this company unfairly. She admits she cancelled her order BEFORE any merchandise was sent to her yet she makes these inconsistent comments: "NOT AUTHENTIC AT ALL!! TAKES YOUR RETURNED BAG, BUT, YOU'LL NEVER SEE YOUR MONEY AGAIN." - how can Peasy truthfully talk about authenticity or a returned bag when she says in the same report:"Getting cold feet, I decided to contact Ms Adams again and ask for my money back as I knew she hadn't shipped the bags out yet." and "So, then she finally sent me an e-mail stating that she did indeed mail me my refund money order and sent me a "rma #" as well." Its obvious that Peasy never even had a bag in hand to make the "not authentic" statement above nor the "unless you want a fake Louis Vuitton bag" comment she makes later in her report - her argument was over money for a cancelled order before any merchandise was examined by her and hence she has by logical deduction of her own report slandered the company unfairly. She further makes her complaint look irrational with her comment "I waited and waited for that money order, called my Post Office and according to them, the item was delivered, however I NEVER received it. Somehow, she used a tracking number that was registered to another item that WAS received to me that day, making it look like I received her refund (that one still baffles me)." It sounds to me that Peasy or the post office made a mistake, not the merchant. I have taken the time to point out the obvious wrongs in Peasy's report because I have purchased from this merchant this last Christmas and had no problems at all. I am planning on purchasing again, and I do check blogs/etc before buying anything online, and I was gassed to see this commentary - I almost took it at face value and wasn't going to purchase again until I read down into it, its just not valid and should be removed.