#2Author of original report
Fri, July 24, 2015
I want to make a change in my report and say I didn’t mean any harm because I think people change as I want to say I am truly sorry for making this report, if I could remove it I would. I am sorry and I think we can put this past us, forgive me as I want to be a better person to all people
oxfordu
LA,#3Author of original report
Wed, March 20, 2013
The people at the 2959 Broad street Quiky Car Wash of San Luis Obispo continue to violate the City signage rules, SHAME.
As agreed upon on August 2012, the owner Hamish & Jill Marshall of Westpac Investments that they must turn the street signs off after hours if they were given a sign as they pleaded for one; they have not followed though at all. Not only have they violated it but they have been told so many times by City officials they are in violation of leaving their car wash sign lights on and they ignored the warnings as the place is a liability to people thinking they are open are not left on to backing up on to oncoming traffic because of this absurd signage left on. Hamish Marshall a billionaire who just wants to do nothing on his dying car wash business to leave it open on paying employees who have no work to do to forget to turn off the street lights and etc things that should be done.
There is basically no management or the management is not doing their job.
I guess Harmish can afford to spend and spend money since he has so much of it to do what he wants and this is the result; $9.00 an hour employees can horse around in a car wash.
J
San Francisco,#4Consumer Comment
Mon, October 01, 2012
Quiky Car Wash owner continues to ignore surrounding noise complaints on his car wash on a business that brings in no business. Many folks ask when is it when is the owner going to realize this business is not working, no customers, no revenue. But hey WestPac Investments made over $6.8 billion dollars in 2011 on banking and has over $870 billion in assets, you think Hamish Marshall would think of how much a noisy car wash is worth it to stay open considering all the money his family has in Austrilla. This guy has been handed so much money to buy properties to spend spend spend on crazy ideas with the City of San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara and etc places.
Folks that live and hear this noisy car wash everyday wonder when this Hamish will use common sense to realize he's wasting his families money on a toy car wash. It is obvious the City made a screw up approving this project as everybody wants his money. Who's being paid off from the City Planning Department avoiding notifying people of such crazy projects, considering the wild idea of a helicopter landing pad downtown for Garden street or the s****.>
J
San Francisco,#5Consumer Comment
Thu, May 31, 2012
I live right near this car wash and I hear the end of the cash wash tunnel consistently all throughout the day. I have a night job and it is a real bother for me to sleep in the daytime. I made a complaint to this owner and nothing is going to be done about the problem. I agree with the original complaint that this is a big problem and the City of San Luis Obispo made a terrible decision to approve this business in an area where people live. We have lived in this area for quite a while when the original location was a furniture store but they took half of that location where they decided to build car wash on a residential side of that same building. Doesn't make one darn of sense for the developers to think this was going to be tolerated with the long term people that live here. If I were to call my real estate agent and call my bank that my house is losing value on a car wash - they will tell me to hire a lawyer because the cost the house has lost already will not pay my mortgage off if I sell the home. This is an issue that affects a lot of people now and where in the world were these business owners thinking when they saw the homes on both corners of this lot? I personally think they thought this is section 8 housing and they can do what they want. It is purely nonsense and if I lose value which already seems to be the case I will send the City Architecture Review Commission and the owner a bill for the loss I should be entitled to if I decide to leave.