Complaint Review: Supercuts - Bellflower California

Most recently a female customer in the city of Covina California went to Supercuts in the city of Covina California. She was honoring the false advertising: That at : Supercuts we pay attention to every detail so you can leave clean and ready to go. As we that had a bad experience are aware some of us has been mistreated. False advertising: California Business and Professions Code: 17200,17500 and 17509. Breach of implied written contract: California Civil Code:3300-3400.  Breach of a verbal promise: California Labor Code:920. I went here honoring the false advertising. However; Was not aware of what incidents would transpire. I sat on the chair. I was provided : At will employee: Samantha. I explained the exact length I wanted the hair cut. Instead of Samantha paying attention to every detail she cut the hair shorter then I wanted. She did not even appologize. Just walked away toward the bathroom shampoo area. Then I was subject to: Hazing, brow beating, badgering ,harassment. Possibly a violation of : Title : V11 of the 1964 Civil Rights Act of 1964. Or a violation of : California Government Code:12900. This at will employee is described as a female Hispanic adult. With a pony tail. She had a smirk on her face. As to give the impression she was holding back hysterical laughter. She made this verbal stray remark: "Now you can wear extentions"!  The onsite manager turned a blind eye. She allowed me to have my hair deliberately vandalized. California Penal Code:594. Defacing of personal properyty . To prove it was intentional as follows: California Penal Code: 26. Under those guilty of a crime not chargeable. (1) Age 14. (2) Some one unconcious. (3) Some one that acted under threat.  (4) By accident. No one observed bumping into to her. (5) Diagnosed as imbacile from birth. With medical documentation.  ( 6) Ingorance.  Note: All beauticians are required to be certified by the barbering and cosmotolgy in Sacramento California. So because she cant be ingorant. This means Samantha wilfully and deliberately vandalized the customers hair. Defacing of personal property. California Penal Code:594.  Plus: All at will employees are required to work honestly and safely. California Labor Code:6300. Plus: All at will employees are required to work with best efforts. California Labor Code:2924.  Also under California Labor Code:2924. For an act to be an act the act must be proven to be wilful deliberate with motive and intent. As we can see clearly : Samantha deliberately vandalized the customer's hair. She was never arrested or charged for her crime. Next: When at will employee with a pony tail made the stray remark: " Now you can wear extentions"! What was her motive and intent. When the customer was already feeling very hurt,betrayed ,sad?   This is a violation of ; California Penal Code:415. Under offensive words.  Plus: Disturbing the peace. The onsite manager : Cecila turned a blind eye. As though she condoned of these actions. Is this aiding and abbeting ?  California Penal Code: 971  ?Section: 30-33. Accesory after the fact? California Penal  Code: 32.  After I was subject to vandalisim , California Penal Code:594, then subject to verbal, badgering , brow beating stray remarks by at will employee ,described as a female : Hispanic adult with a pony tail.  Possible violation of : California Penal Code:415. Then the manager came over to wear I was sitting: She offered no appology nothing. Just came over to finish cutting the hair. When she was done I wanted to use the bathroom just to clean off hair and inquire how I looked. The Cecila the onsite manager of : Supercuts in the city of ; Covina California. Cross streets: Azusa Ave. and San Bernardino Rd. Forcfully aggresively attacked me. She is bigger and much stronger. I feared inhury and harm. California is suppose to have a new : Stand your ground law. Meaning a victim of assuelt has the right to act in self defense. If they fear injury or death. This new rule: Is a result of the rulling in reference to the : George Zimmormen trial in Florida. Cecila was the aggreassor . She forcifully attacked the customer. As we are aware: Cecila's actions are a violation of public policy: California Penal Code:240. Assuelt. Plus: Grabbing the arm is another crime. Possibly: False imprisonment. California Penal Code:236.2 Section: C. When I tried to defend my self and : Act in self defense. Then Cecila said," Now she is pressing charges".  I drove to the police department. I wanted to report the fact I was a victim to a crime. I wanted to file a police report. The officer I met gave the impression he was going to help. By saying: " Want to tell me what happened".  Then another officer arrived : He had the aggressor with him. Cecilia and she was with her accomplice co worker. The at will employee ,with a pony tail. Note: I did not drive to the police station to be asked questions. I went there to file a police report. I was not told I was not under arrest and free to leave This is in reference to the : Six rules in reference to the : Miranda Warning.  This is in reference to : Rule:3.  Then it appears: Rule : 4. was over looked: The police officer that brought : Cecila and pony tail said," I have lots of witnesess"! This appears to be what is called : Prompting. The U.S. Sumpreme Court said," Prompting bad words or actions should not be used. This is in reference to rule :4. I then was arrested. My picture and finger prints were taken. The Covina police competly took the side of: Cecila . Note: Black's Law Dictionary says there are : 29 different types of witnesses. Starting with: Accomplice witness.  Note: What is a witnbess: Every witness is an editor. A witness can not tell you everything they see and hear this would be impossible. So a witeness can only tell you what they found significant in their own preconseptions. Written: By Patrick Delvin. Criminal Prosecution.  Notes: Could the hidden agenda of Suercuts be: That when a customer is mistreared to gang up on the customer. Then turn everything around then make the customer the fall guy. Also is it perhaps possible since money talks that the big : Supercuts corporation pays the local city hall a little extra to turn a blind eye? Money does talk.  Does some city halls have : Whores in suits???? Taking possible pay offs???  All I know is that: There is two sides to the story then the truth. Employees will stick together. The first type of witness is called: A Accomplice witness.  Now to knip things in the bud.  Its time to introduce scientific evidence: (1) http://www.no.lie.m.r.i.com.. This form of scientific evidence when the subject is asked certain questions will determine if the subject is lying or telling the truth.  ( 2) California Evidence Code: 801.70. This is the lie truth serum.  Sodium pentethol  . Used by our government officials. This is admissable in a court of law. Why? Because it past the : Kelly Frye Rule of scientific evidence.  Obviously the dossage should be perhaps based on : Body weight. ( 3) Califiornia Evidence Code: Section: 795. Hypnosis.  This also past the : Kelly Frye Rule of scientific evidence.  Now will the employees of Supercuts volunteer for these three forms of scientific evidence? This is not a violation of the polygragh protection act???? To refuse does show : Reasonable doubt.  Which equals guilt. With these following prerequsites: ( A) Volunteer to have a blood and urine test?  ( B) Volunteer to have a credable toxicology report by a licensed medical doctor?  ( C) Volunter in writing or implied or verbally which is expressed to have thier voice print pattern measured for strees levels with a : F.B.I. calorated voice analizer machine?   (D) No shoes so they can't put thumb tacks?  ( E) Completly volunteer for the entire three forms of ; Scientific evidence along with the suggested prerequsites: A-E ? Plus: ( F) Volunteer to be filmed while being asked questions with the three forms of scientific forms of evidence with the prerequsites while being completly filmed to be posted for : You Tube. Note: To refuse can only mean one thing and show one thing: ( Reasonable doubt).  as we are aware can only mean one thing and equate to one thing: ( Guilt ). Grounds to be arrested and charged. Grounds for termination. Breach of implied contract. California Civil Codes: 3300-3400.