Rob
San Antonio,#2Consumer Suggestion
Tue, November 02, 2004
first off: all comprehensive claims are not things that raise your rates! This is due to them being acts of nature or acts of god: ie.,flying objects,animal,theft,hail claims. All of these do not raise your rates. If there is numerous amounts of them , such as thefts, hail, you may receive a letter that we need to reevaluate them as you are not protecting your own property and might not be doing such a great job. It may be as simple as underwriting requesting you to raise your deductibles if you live in a ghetto area. (although your rates are figured by your county& zip code). For your particular claim with the shuttle bus their the file needed to be bumped upto a senior claim rep as there is possible of subrogation to recoup your deductible and what usaa paid out to include any rental car bill.--- i would hope you took their plate number and we would run a ck on the owner of the vehicle....understand their is a fine line with if the shuttle kicked up normal road debris/ which is road hazard and then we would not have any subro rights (like a pebble kicked up by another vehicle is simple road hazard and usaa could not subrogate for that). now for your 2 other mishaps-- they are both collision losses that you were simply at fault for and will be held responsible for and those created a rate increase... what happened is this--- even though there was no payout on the one claim that was just reported--- (which you did the right thing by reporting)... rates never went up because there was never any payout (texas has a $500 amount before rates go up)... there is wording in your contract that allows to go back and count the axx where you hit the car in frt of you. You can word as litely as you want, but you still rearended a vehicle in front of you and now you and usaa have a liability exposure that they are obligated to responsible for. As for your raise in your rates, the wording your policy allows to go back and count both accidents if you have another accident within a 3yr time frame of the one axx that they paid out for (the backing into the pole). the clue rpt is a good thing! would you like your company to insure some guy who has a list of claims. Your problem was that you needed to do the math on the payout of pole accident: for example what your part of the claim would be against what the claim was paying out: ex: pole accident damage of $1200.00 your ded $500.00 usaa paid out $700.00 texas threshold states if paying out more than $500 and at fault your rates can be raised at the next renewal. but the true reflection not only adds the cost of the pole claim, but also the rearend w/no payout. your increase of $400 for six months will be for 3years... and will follow you for the next 3yrs. thats were clue comes in and gives a clue to the other companies so they now what kind of risk you are to insure. again they are adding the rearend claim as you had an at fault axx increasing probability statistically to have more accidents! sorry--for your bad luck hope this helps--