Harold
BUFFALO,#2Consumer Comment
Sun, July 13, 2008
SOMETHING does not add up, aside from the date of the incident. On one hand you state your room mate forged your name on the checks, on the other hand you state that the bank had no signature cards of your room mate on file. If your room mate forged your name on the checks, no addl. signature cards were needed. Do you mean that the bank did not compare signatures? Check vs. signature cards? Give me a break! The bank does not check signatures unless there is a cause to be suspicious. Furthermore, the bank usually refunds any monies lost due to fraud if the account holder (victim) is willing to prosecute. The bank would have issued you a lette, indicating why they refused to refund you your losses. What did this letter say??? If everything is the way you say it is, why did you not ask the DA to assist you with the bank? Something does not add up here. HWH - Buffalo
Jim
Anaheim,#3Consumer Comment
Tue, July 08, 2008
Michelle, your action should not be against the bank. They are not responsible for the theft of money from your bank. Your roomate is the one who stole the money from your account. The fact it was done fraudulently has nothing to do with the bank. Unless you can prove the bank was negligent, the bank is not entitled to give you anything. As you said, "The defendant stole my life...." , not the bank.
D
Naples,#4Consumer Comment
Tue, July 08, 2008
Please get you facts straight and proof read your post before you post. You say this started in October 2008? I'm sorry but October 2008 is THREE MONTHS FROM NOW. Please respond....